| Revision as of 16:41, 8 June 2008 edit86.2.32.31 (talk) Request for comment on inclusion of reference 22← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 11:47, 7 November 2024 edit undoJauerback (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators72,512 editsm rvTag: Rollback |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{film|class=Future}} |
|
|
|
{{Not a forum|speculating over the cast, human or robot}} |
|
==Just a reminder...== |
|
|
|
{{Article history |
|
The production team of TF2 is throwing out so much false information (in hopes of engulfing any true leaks that may get out to the public) that it may be difficult to know what is fact and what is fiction. Keep your ears open! ] (]) 18:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action1 = WAR |
|
:I am aware, but rest assured I adhere highly to ], so it's not an issue. ] (]) 18:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action1date = 05:00, 10 November 2009 |
|
|
|action1link = Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Film/Assessment/Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen |
|
|
|action1result = failed |
|
|
|action1oldid = 325037634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action2=GAN |
|
== Well done! == |
|
|
|
|action2date=00:50, 30 August 2011 |
|
|
|action2link=Talk:Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen/GA1 |
|
|
|action2result=not listed |
|
|
|action2oldid=447069045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action3= GAN |
|
I applaud Alientraveller for a job well done. You've lifted this article from a redirection into a great article, and it hasn't even been on for a week yet. Bravo. ] (]) 16:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action3date= 17:35, 20 May 2019 |
|
:Thank you. ] (]) 21:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action3link= /GA2 |
|
::And just a note: considering someone took this as an opportunity to bash me, just note: compliments or criticism goes to user talkpages. This applies to all talk pages. But it is nice. ] (]) 10:46, 7 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action3result= not listed |
|
|
|action3oldid= |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|
== Jazz is dead == |
|
|
|
|topic=film |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B| |
|
|
{{WikiProject Film|American=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Toys|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Transformers|importance=high}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Science Fiction|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Egypt|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Jordan|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low |AZ=yes |AZ-importance=low|DC=yes|DC-importance=Low|USFilm=yes|USFilm-importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Animation|importance=Bottom|film=yes|film-importance=mid}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Press|date=August 17, 2009 |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/6043534/The-50-most-viewed-Misplaced Pages-articles-in-2009-and-2008.html |title=The 50 most-viewed Misplaced Pages articles in 2009 and 2008 |org=]}} |
|
|
{{banner holder|collapsed=yes| |
|
|
{{Annual report|]|10,067,690}} |
|
|
{{Broken anchors|links= |
|
|
* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#Cultural influence) has been ] before. <!-- {"title":"Cultural influence","appear":{"revid":174579689,"parentid":174579635,"timestamp":"2007-11-29T12:03:00Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":729651375,"parentid":729625261,"timestamp":"2016-07-13T17:28:43Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":}} --> |
|
|
}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 200K |
|
|
|counter = 3 |
|
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{archives |bot=MiszaBot I |age=30 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ] for ] == |
|
Michael Bay said so himself. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:Could have been lying, but we will not know until an ''official'' announcement or when the film is out. Thus, I removed these rumours from the article. ] (]) 10:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:''This review is transcluded from ]. The edit link for the section below can be used to add comments to the review. |
|
== 3-D == |
|
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Films/Assessment/Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen}} |
|
So it's gonna b 3-D like Bewoulf?] (]) 16:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:So who's seen ''Beowulf'' in 3D? We don't know, because it's never been discussed beyond being listed by the distributors. When info arrives, it'll be in the article. ] (]) 21:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Rumoured title == |
|
== Budget == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
] says not to cherry pick budget figures. The budget is listed as $200 million based on information BoxOfficeMojo.com but The-Numbers.com says the budget was $210 million. -- ] (]) 22:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC) |
|
Head's up: this reports this film will be subtitled ''Revenge of the Fallen''. A blog also reports it, although whether their source is this blog or if it's the other way round, remains to be seen. Secondly, will it be called ''Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen'' or contain the number? I will keep waiting for a press release or a Bay forum post. ] (]) 15:39, 5 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
: I checked the ] and it pointed to an interview where Michael Bay saying the film cost $194 million -- ] (]) 22:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:: I have added the slightly higher $210 million budget figure to the article since no one has provided any reason why it wasn't included before. -- ] (]) 18:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC) |
|
It is ''confirmed.'' |
|
|
*http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=45714 |
|
|
*http://www.superherohype.com/news/transformersnews.php?id=7298 |
|
|
*http://seibertron.com/news/view.php?id=13247 |
|
|
] (]) 17:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:Simply because many sites report a rumour doesn't mean it is confirmed. ] (]) 17:48, 5 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
::And now it ''is'' confirmed by ]. Jeez, what a bizarre way to announce a title: putting it on a blog, then announcing it. ] (]) 17:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Call sheet== |
|
|
I've removed all statements apparently sourced only from a purported call sheet that was posted to a forum. This is an encyclopedia, it isn't a place for gossip, speculation and dodgy references. --] 11:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
:A call sheet is not a dodgy reference. ] (]) 15:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
::What evidence is there that the call sheet is authentic? I think it looks real but is there coclusive proof? If not, the first editors removal of all refs seems apprpriate. Thoughts? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
::: That's it. It's just something posted by somebody to some board or other. Even if it comes from the production company, it could be a sample sheet or the cast could have been changed after it was produced. We have no way of authenticating it at all. --] 13:26, 8 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==RfC: Is reference 22 permissable?== |
|
|
|
|
|
{{RFCmedia| section=References !! reason=Reference 22 is a posting of an apparent casting sheet to a forum. It does not seem that it can be proved as 100% authentic and accurate (it may have changed). Is its inclusion permitted under Misplaced Pages rules? Thank you !! time= 16:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC) }} |
|
|
|
|
|
22 is a posting of an apparent casting sheet to a forum. It does not seem that it can be proved as 100% authentic and accurate (it may have changed). Is its inclusion permitted under Misplaced Pages rules? Thank you |
|
