Revision as of 14:19, 11 June 2008 editGosgood (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,456 edits Question if the New York Times quote -- an old, brief reference -- really supports a rather broad endorsement in the lead.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:31, 29 March 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,815,464 editsm Remove unknown param from WP New York (state): Cornell-importanceTag: AWB |
(24 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Article history |
|
{{GA nominee|16:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)|status=|}} |
|
|
|
|action1=AFD |
|
{{Project Cornell}} |
|
|
|
|action1date=15:07, 20 May 2006 |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Secret Societies|class=B|importance=low}} |
|
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sphinx Head Society |
|
{{oldafdfull|date=15 May 2006|result='''delete'''}} |
|
|
|
|action1result=delete |
|
{{oldafdfull|date=9 December 2007|votepage=Sphinx Head|result='''keep'''}} |
|
|
|
|action1oldid=53275965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action2=AFD |
|
|
|action2date=14:41, 17 December 2007 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sphinx Head |
|
|
|action2result=keep |
|
|
|action2oldid=178320191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action3=GAN |
|
I dont understand why this article would be considered for deletion. If you have any suggestions for how to make it better please post them here. ] (]) 16:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action3date=22:25, 15 June 2008 |
|
|
|action3link=Talk:Sphinx Head/GA1 |
|
|
|action3result=not listed |
|
|
|action3oldid=219491978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|
:The biggest issue I would see for this article is the list of notable alumni. If you look at some of the pages regarding freemasonry, and its appendant/concordant bodies, we have tried to limit those lists to only a very few, specifically looking at those who are notable because of their membership, or their activities which relate to their membership in the group.--] (]) 18:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|topic=socsci |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
== New York Times reference == |
|
|
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
Can a single remark in a 541 word article appearing over 79 years ago in the <i>New York Times</i> be construed as a basis for that paper's endorsement: 'recognized by The New York Times as "the highest non-scholastic honor within reach of undergraduates.'? I do not think this citation in a very old article can be construed as any sort of endorsement that the current day paper would undertake about the current day society. And while I pray that this article's wait in the Good Article nomination queue will be considerably shorter than 79 years, I do hope that editors will make use of intervening time to consider how well such references work. In addition, I find that the very comprehensive, and apparently very carefully referenced, list of notable alumni detracts from the article. In my opinion, the list as a whole plunges into considerably greater detail about just one facet of the society — notable alumni — than what other facets explored by the article do. The list is about an invigorating a read as a telephone directory. In light of this, please consider the ] guideline; a paragraph of clear prose far outweighs an exhaustive, even exhaustively referenced, list, which is a mechanical communication effort at best – my humble opinion, of course. ] (]) 14:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject New York (state)|importance=Low|Cornell=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Higher education}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Secret Societies|importance=Low}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{to do}} |