| Revision as of 20:00, 12 June 2008 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →Reply: comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:08, 14 September 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed stale messages from inactive IP talkpage. (Task 13)Tags: AWB Replaced | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| I performed some mainly copyedits on the contentious ] page which carries two major tags requiring work. I responded to other editors reasonable questions. | |||
| Very shortly after, I received a number of increasingly hysteria warning threats and revisions from a Pro-Korean editors ] . | |||
| I recognised that I was being set up in an attempted ] or IP admin that would support his POV and post a note of this on his page ... preempting exactly what I suspected 1 minute later . | |||
| Then followed a complaint by the user to http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. | |||
| What I am doing is plainly not vandalism. I have added quotations on both sides of the argument, whittle down the written English and am attempting to address the main tags at the top of the page. I am perfectly happy to discuss my edits but not be subjected to intimidation in this manner. --] (]) 18:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2008 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Comfort women|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | |||
| == Reply == | |||
| Caspian blue has reverted you on ] exactly one time. That is not edit warring. Two other editors have also reverted your changes to that article (well, three now if you count me). You have undone the changes of each of those editors. That is considered edit warring ''regardless of the merits of your claim''. I see you have switched to discussing the matter on the ], that is good. I trust you will not revert the article again without establishing consensus. Thank you. --] (]) 18:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) 19:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> 3RR on ]. ] (]) 19:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock|'''Let us be honest and clear ... this is a knowingly contrived situation designed to maintain control of an article''' ... Indeed, one I predicted the account Caspian blue would attempt on his talk page and above at top. | |||
| --- '''*'''All three editor performed the identical and total deletion of all of the work I am doing on the article. | |||
| --- '''*''' All three removed entirely neutral copyedits. | |||
| --- '''*''' None engaged in any discussion | |||
| --- '''*''' None had previous sought to address the tags at the top of the article. | |||
| --- '''*''' I do not challenge any of the claims on the article nor have I ever suggested that Korean women were signing up in droves so, please, get real. | |||
| --- '''*''' I have attempted discuss with all parties and on the topic page. | |||
| --- '''*''' And it is entirely accurate to represent, as I have done, that there was an existing sex industry in Korea prior to, during, and after the Japanese invasion (indeed, it expanded considerable during the American invasion). If war is anything, it is crime by men against women regardless of race or nationality. I am not Asian, putting this topic into shape is going to require an impartial hand. | |||
| ---'''*''' The intention behind Caspian's assault is far too transparent (he even presents the attempt to continue a discussion on his talk page as a 3RR!) and the protagonists have immediately reverted all edits. | |||
| ---'''*''' Lastly, if you look at the diffs, I was actually continuing to develop topic and being the one '''subject''' to identical revisions. --] (]) 19:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
| *'''Comment''': You can still edit your talk page, so I kindly suggest you to remove personal attacks against me such as ''Very shortly after, I received a number of <u>increasingly hysteria warning threats and revisions from a Pro-Korean editors</u> Caspian_blue . I recognised that <u>I was being set up in an attempted WP:3RR</u> or IP admin that would support his POV and post a note of this on his page ... preempting exactly what I suspected 1 minute later . | |||
| Who reported your own case to ] and ]? The former was done by you and the other was by Jay. You're the one having a problem with your own attitude, so left the improper comments against me on my talk page and here and there. If your claims are all right, why many editors restored from your massive blanked materials at {{la|Japanese war crimes}}, {{la|Comfort women}}? At this point, I only see your personal attacks here. That is not good for your unblock request. --] (]) 20:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:08, 14 September 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.