| Revision as of 05:45, 15 June 2008 view sourceNed Scott (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users39,898 edits →One week page ban from Muhammad al-Durrah← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:55, 30 April 2015 view source Maintenance script (talk | contribs)Bots398 editsm Maintenance script moved page User talk:ChrisO to User talk:ChrisO~enwiki without leaving a redirect: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "ChrisO" to "ChrisO~enwiki" | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| ''Old discussions now at ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ] / ]'' | |||
| '''Please add new comments below.''' | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==Edit summaries== | |||
| Please try to keep your edit summaries civil. Saying "loony conspiracy theories" was not. Also, what was this one about? He's not even editing the talkpage. --]]] 05:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Oops, sorry - that should have been addressed to Canadian Monkey, not Tundrabuggy. It's hard to tell all these SPAs apart... -- ] (]) 07:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: Who do we need to talk to in order to have your edit privileges revoked? You banned me for 24 hours for "personal attacks" and completely ignored all the personal attacks against me, and now you're attacking others. You are ill suited for the role of impartial referee. ] (]) 13:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Dkendr, it's not at all clear what you're talking about. Could you please provide links or ]? Thanks, ]]] 14:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Not clear?? Look up 8 lines - he's calling me a SPA. You've lost all credibility with me, Elonka. ] (]) 17:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: ChrisO, Canadian Monkey has a point, though he could express it better. But it is true that he has over a thousand edits on a variety of articles, of which ] isn't even in the top ten. He has definitely participated quite a bit at ], but why do you feel that justifies referring to him as a SPA? I see little resemblance between his editing, and someone like Tundrabuggy. --]]] 00:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==] == | |||
| As a result of the above-named Arbitration case, the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if logged ]. | |||
| --]]] 01:21, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==One week page ban from ]== | |||
| ChrisO, I am sorry to have had to take this step, but you were clearly not honoring the restrictions which were placed at ] on June 10. One of the restrictions that I placed, as an uninvolved administrator, was "No reverts". I have also been giving you steadily increasing cautions that your behavior was causing concerns. On June 12, you reverted the article twice, I then told you clearly, "one more revert and you were going under ArbCom sanctions". Since then, I have also cautioned you about incivility in edit summaries, such as when you referred to things as "Loony conspiracy theorising". Then today, I saw that you did another revert. The edit is not ''labeled'' as a revert, but it clearly is one, as you cleanly wiped out all intermediate edits, back to your own last version. As such, I am formally placing you under ArbCom restrictions. Specifically, I would like you to avoid the ] article and its talkpage for the next week. At 01:00 UTC on 22 June 2008, you can resume talkpage participation. The article-editing restriction remains for at least 30 days, though it may be lifted sooner depending on your ability to discuss things calmly at talk. --]]] 01:54, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :You placed a restriction of .... no reverts? How the hell does that work on a Wiki? Arbcom said you could make restrictions as an uninvolved admin, but that's assuming the restrictions made sense. -- ] 05:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:55, 30 April 2015
Redirect to: