Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Miami Vice DVD releases: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:07, 17 June 2008 editAnmaFinotera (talk | contribs)107,494 edits →Miami Vice DVD releases: expand← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:27, 7 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(16 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Delete''' and redirect to ]. <strong><span style="font-family:Monotype;">]]</span></strong> 01:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}


:{{la|Miami Vice DVD releases}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Miami Vice DVD releases}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
] DVD releases of the series. No significant coverage and excessive detail. Misplaced Pages is not a sales catalog. All pertinent information is already provided in ] and ] -- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 15:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC) ] DVD releases of the series. No significant coverage and excessive detail. Misplaced Pages is not a sales catalog. All pertinent information is already provided in ] and ] -- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 15:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—-- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 15:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)</small> *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small><small>—-- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 15:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)</small>


*'''Keep''' I expect you to nominate every other tv show that has a DVD releases article. <sub>]</sub><sup>(])</sup> 18:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC) *'''Keep''' I expect you to nominate every other tv show that has a DVD releases article. <sub>]</sub><sup>(])</sup> 18:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
::When I find them, I do, and most are deleted or merged. Misplaced Pages is not a sales catalog, and this page does nothing but list the contents of each DVD set, which is excessive detail and completely unnecessary. Its already covered in TWO other articles, as is appropriate by the guidelines set by the Television project. -- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 18:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC) ::When I find them, I do, and most are deleted or merged. Misplaced Pages is not a sales catalog, and this page does nothing but list the contents of each DVD set, which is excessive detail and completely unnecessary. Its already covered in TWO other articles, as is appropriate by the guidelines set by the Television project. -- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 18:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
:::Well here's two more then: ] and ]. <sub>]</sub><sup>(])</sup> 19:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC) :::Well here's two more then: ] and ]. <sub>]</sub><sup>(])</sup> 19:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


::::~sigh~ why not just stick to this AfD instead of being provoking? I'd suggest re-reading the ] guidelines, especially the "How to discuss an AfD" section. ] is not a valid keep reason at all. ::::~sigh~ why not just stick to this AfD instead of being provoking? I'd suggest re-reading the ] guidelines, especially the "How to discuss an AfD" section. ] is not a valid keep reason at all.


::::The Lost DVD is already in discussions (and consensus) for a merge back to the episode lists. This article is redundant and gives extremely ] to a very common element of a television series. There is nothing striking, notable, or unusual about the Miami Vice DVD releases that warrant such excessive and extensive coverage. Its already covered in the episode list and the main Miami Vice article.-- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 20:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC) ::::The Lost DVD is already in discussions (and consensus) for a merge back to the episode lists. This article is redundant and gives extremely ] to a very common element of a television series. There is nothing striking, notable, or unusual about the Miami Vice DVD releases that warrant such excessive and extensive coverage. Its already covered in the episode list and the main Miami Vice article.-- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 20:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' Covered in ], no need to have a separate article. --] 01:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per sufficient coverage at ]. –''']''' <small>''] • ]''</small> 20:14, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - per thedemonhog --]-] 00:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - So ] is immune or something? Miami Vice DVD releases is referenced just like the Simpson's article, yet what makes this article necessary for deletion, but The Simpsons can stay? At any rate the Simpsons will be the only DVD article on Misplaced Pages, for what reason? <sub>]</sub><sup>(])</sup> 00:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
:*] (or its cousin, ]) is not a justification to for keeping an article under discussion. Until there is enough information in ] to force the separation of subpages into standalone articles, '''merge into ]'''.] (]) 03:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
:*I feel that ] should be deleted as well as these --]-] 14:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
:*'''Comment''' This is an AfD debate for ]. No one is stopping anyone from nominating ] for deletion to set up its own debate. --] (]) 06:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
::*It was already nominated, at the same time as this, and kept due the Simpsons having numerous non-season sets, unlike ''Miami Vice'' which just has the standard box sets. -- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 06:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' as indiscriminate info. List of episodes article is enough. Was willing to be convinced, but only keep arguemnt are "the Simpson's dvds have an article!"] (]) 15:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' Is asking for the article to be redirected to the '']'' article a possibility? <sub>]</sub><sup>(])</sup> 21:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' reviews easily establish notability, and DVD specific information is the main focus, making it different than the episodes list. ] (]) 01:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 22:27, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to Miami Vice#DVD releases. Cenarium 01:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Miami Vice DVD releases

Miami Vice DVD releases (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unnotable DVD releases of the series. No significant coverage and excessive detail. Misplaced Pages is not a sales catalog. All pertinent information is already provided in the main article and the episode list -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

When I find them, I do, and most are deleted or merged. Misplaced Pages is not a sales catalog, and this page does nothing but list the contents of each DVD set, which is excessive detail and completely unnecessary. Its already covered in TWO other articles, as is appropriate by the guidelines set by the Television project. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Well here's two more then: Lost DVD releases and The Simpsons DVDs. El Greco 19:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
~sigh~ why not just stick to this AfD instead of being provoking? I'd suggest re-reading the AfD Wikietiquette guidelines, especially the "How to discuss an AfD" section. The claim of other similar articles is not a valid keep reason at all.
The Lost DVD is already in discussions (and consensus) for a merge back to the episode lists. This article is redundant and gives extremely undue weight to a very common element of a television series. There is nothing striking, notable, or unusual about the Miami Vice DVD releases that warrant such excessive and extensive coverage. Its already covered in the episode list and the main Miami Vice article.-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 20:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.