Misplaced Pages

User talk:Shalom Yechiel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:01, 19 June 2008 editFone4My (talk | contribs)696 edits Thank you← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:30, 25 December 2023 edit undoAirshipJungleman29 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors44,020 edits Endgame tablebase listed for good article reassessment (GAR-helper
(137 intermediate revisions by 66 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{archivebox|]}} {{archivebox|]}}
== Sock puppet of Pete K ==


== Shalom also means "goodbye" ==
An IP address in the same IP range, {{User|75.35.23.210}}, is again editing the ] article now that the two-week ban of ] is over. ] (]) 21:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


I am leaving English Misplaced Pages and all Wikimedia projects. After I relocate in August, I will create a new username.
:And now and also ] . --] (]) 03:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


Misplaced Pages is causing me more stress than it's worth. After discussing my options by email correspondence with three administrators this week, I have decided to leave.
::Thanks, sorry to bother you with this. --] (]) 03:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


I created a rant about 60 kilobytes long on my computer to complain about how unfairly the community treated me. I will not post it. That's not how I wish to be remembered.
== Nyannrunning Sockpuppets ==


I'd like you to read one article I've written or improved during the last two and a half years. Pick any article from ] or the . That's how I wish to be remembered.
I just wanted to thank you for doing all that work regarding the Nyannrunning sockpuppet case. Wildhartlivie and I have been dealing with that whole situation for ages and it's nice to see someone finally take the time to make all the connections. Again, thank you so much! ] 01:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
:You're welcome. I worked hard on that case, so it feels good to hear you thank me. I hope to continue helping the community. ] (] • ]) 01:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


I too want to thank you. It has been, as you can probably tell, a long battle to prove something that we ''knew'' was the case. I appreciate your hard work and support on this case. ] (]) 04:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC) Shalom also means "goodbye." I offer best wishes to everyone who made editing here such a pleasant and fulfilling experience. ] (]) 15:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;"
== ] ==
|-
I suggest we block the sock to discourage this behavior. The sock has not been used since the case was raised, which strongly implies that there's not a real person who has been unjustly accused. David Justin should continue to edit under his own name. (I think it's unlikely that David Justin has forgotten how to sign in. You'll see that he stopped editing under his own name on 27 April 2006 and resumed again on 6 March 2007 without a problem. A checkuser on the sock could be compared with the earlier ] might yield some interesting results. ] (]) 15:57, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
! style="background-color: #f2dfce;" | This series of discussions has been archived.
:I'll send this to ]. He's the administrator I consult when I can't handle a situation on my own. ] (] • ]) 16:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
|-
| style="text-align:center; font-style:italic;" | The following is an archived debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>
|-
| style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |


== Richard Stern == == Your ER ==


If you happen to see this, i have left more comments and added some questions. Cheers, ]] 01:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I sincerely appreciate your strong delete recommendation on my page. It seems you're the only one around here who understands what's happening and the unreal sense that I have no control over it. So, thank you. ] (]) 17:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


==Everyking==
== ] and his socks ==
EK has a penchant for re-writing history in his favor. See . Take what he says with a grain of salt. ] (]) 05:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


==Second Annual WikiNYC Picnic==
Since you closed the sock case, does that mean that all the ranges we found he operates on have been blocked aswell?— '''<font color="Green">]</font>]'''<sup>]</sup> <big>'''/'''</big><small> ]</small><big>'''\'''</big> <sup>]</sup> 04:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual ] on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please ] and be sure to ]! Please be sure to come!<br /><small>You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the ]. ] (]) 20:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)</small>
:Please reopen the case, seems more IPs are surfacing.— '''<font color="Green">]</font>]'''<sup>]</sup> <big>'''/'''</big><small> ]</small><big>'''\'''</big> <sup>]</sup> 19:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


== Wikis Take Manhattan ==
== User:Shalom/Drafts and archives/Yisrael Rozen ==
{| class="infobox" style="width:250px"
|-
| ]
|''']'''
<br/>Next: ''']'''
<br/><span class="noprint plainlinksneverexpand" style="white-space:nowrap; font-size:xx-small">This box: ]&nbsp;<span style="font-size:80%;">•</span>&nbsp;]&nbsp;<span style="font-size:80%;">•</span>&nbsp;</span>
|}
'''WHAT'''
] is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Misplaced Pages and
articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Misplaced Pages Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well.


'''LAST YEAR'S EVENT'''
Done, it's at ]. --] (]) 05:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


*] (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
==Re: SSP==
*] (our cool gallery)
Peace friend, and thank you for the analysis on the situation. I initially reacted pretty badly as Elonka pointed out, though in my defense if you check the guy's comments on her talk page he was pretty open about hurling all sorts of personal insults at me and I reacted as most people would. It's good to have a third party perspective from someone not directly involved. I hope we can get this whole thing sorted out soon, it seems rather obvious to me that this is the same guy back with a vengeance. ] (]) 06:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


'''WINNINGS?'''
== Rename on en.wikibooks ==
Prizes include a dinner for three with Misplaced Pages creator ] at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more!


'''WHEN'''
I have renamed your account on en.wikibooks to ], as per your request. If you have any questions or comments about this, let me know. --] (]) 21:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.


'''WHO'''
==Huh?==
All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!
Re "Keep PJHaseldine gives a valid rationale for having this page in his userspace. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 15:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)". How is this valid? It violates several wiki policies. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 23:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
:OK, it such a case, go ahead and edit the archive, noting it was an ec. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 23:32, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


'''REGISTER'''
== rfa thank ye ==
The proper place to register your team is . It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.


'''WHERE'''
Just wanted to thank you for your participation in my recent RFA. You may find my in-depth analysis at ] interesting, I'm seeking community input on a number of issues. there's also some standard thank-spam below for you. ] (]) 23:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:


*
<div class="NavFrame" style="width:100%"><div class="NavHead"
style="background:87 CE EB;">templated rfa thank-spam</div><div class="NavContent"
style="display:none; text-align:left; background:240 248 255;">
{{User:Xenocidic/RFA}}
</div></div>


:349 W. 12th St. #3
== rename on simple@wiki ==
:Between Greenwich & Washington Streets
:By the 14th St./8th Ave. ACE/L stop


'''FOR UPDATES'''
I renamed you as request on simple.wiki, thanks. --] ] 08:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


Check out:
== Barnstar ==


* main website
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"

|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.
|rowspan="2" |

|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
Thanks,
:]

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at ].<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 00:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)</small>
<!-- ] -->|}

==Epilogue==
I am writing to say goodbye to those of you who still watchlist my talk page, and to offer a chance for you to wish me well. One of the hardest things about moving on from a relationship is forgetting the painful memories and the lost hopes associated with that relationship. I accomplished many achievements here, but I never helped the project as an administrator (though I performed administrative tasks without the tool-set); I never submitted a featured article (though I did submit a good article at ]); and I never completed coverage of towns and villages in Israel (though I did create more than 100 articles about these places). I am proud of what I did, broadly speaking, and for my mistakes and failures, I am trying to retain whatever lessons I can apply to life outside the four walls of Misplaced Pages.

Last year I spent an extraordinary amount of time on Misplaced Pages. Without revealing too much personal information, I'll explain that I was working freelance part-time but I had most of my waking hours to spend at my discretion, and I donated that time to the project. Two months ago I relocated and began graduate school in the chemistry department of a major research university on the east coast of the United States. (You can read my admission essay at ].) My teaching and learning responsibilities do not permit anything more than a cursory interest in Misplaced Pages, and sometimes not even that. Last month I created an anonymous user account for editing and creating articles related to chemistry. ] (]) 19:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;"
|- |-
! style="background-color: #f2dfce;" | My thoughts on various issues
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | for your work on creating the article and deeply covering the topic ]. ] (]) 23:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
|} |-
| style="text-align:center; font-style:italic;" | The following is an archived debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>
|-
| style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |

I wish to leave my thoughts on various issues that I expect will engage the community's attention during the next months and years.

===Honesty is the best policy===

] is marked as an essay, not even a guideline. There is currently a discussion at ] where someone had the gumption to suggest Wikipedians should abide by such a basic ethical principle. "Honesty is the best policy," according to a popular saying, and honesty should be required of all users on Misplaced Pages. Making baseless accusations against another user is unacceptable. Misrepresenting your real-world credentials is unacceptable. Misrepresenting the content or intent of sources is unacceptable. ] should be at least a behavioral guideline on par with ].

===RFA reform===

I support the efforts of ] and others in the ]. I have spent many hours thinking about what might discourage users from engaging in the false statements, assumptions of bad faith, and borderline personal attacks that pushed my temper over the edge in July. I prefer not to discuss my particular case anymore, but I recognize it as a wider problem. I perceive that RFA has become a toxic environment, one where false statements, assumptions of bad faith, and borderline personal attacks are tolerated as the price of vetting candidates for the stressful situations that some administrators may face. Standards of conduct from RFA commenters need to improve: users who can maintain neutrality in a particular RFA discussion should watch for comments that cross the line and not be shy about challenging them, and if necessary, asking a bureaucrat to remove or disregard them.

===Administrator accountability===
I support the ]. I don't understand all the details, but the delays in recent arbitrations cases have shown clearly that the community needs a functioning process for removing administrators by a vote of no confidence. In the C68-FM-SV arbitration case, 16 users (including me) supported a proposal to desysop one of the parties, while only four opposed and one was ambivalent: by RFA standards this counts as consensus, yet not a single arbitrator submitted the desysop proposal for consideration. (It's possible that the commenters at the ArbCom workshop were biased, but I don't think so: most of them were not significantly involved in the case except as observers.) The community logically holds the power to remove admins as it does to promote them; it should be able to exercise that power if needed. The benefits would be a streamlined process, lasting one to two weeks instead of four months, and a confidence that adminship will again be not such a big deal because anyone can be demoted almost as easily as they were promoted.

===Jimbo's role===
I would like ] to resign or limit his special powers to ban or unban, promote or desysop, appoint or remove from ArbCom, etc. I never granted him these powers, and I do not think he has used them wisely enough to justify retaining them. I support ]'s effort to clarify the ]. Just recently that he would retain the power to appoint any candidate who receives 50% or more of the vote, even to promote a candidate at 51% and reject another candidate at 80%. There is no justification for one man to veto the wishes of hundreds of voters. ], but when it pretends to be one, the pretense should be legitimately founded. I won't resign in protest if Jimbo appoints the wrong candidates to ArbCom, but I can voice my displeasure in advance, and I am doing that now.

I should note in passing that Hebrew Misplaced Pages, where I participated in community affairs for a short time, functions just fine without an absentee figurehead deciding critical issues once or a few times every year. Other large Wikipedias and sister projects also function as well or better without Jimbo or even an Arbitration Committee. English Misplaced Pages really does need the Arbitration Committee, but it does not need Jimbo's role.


===Candidates for the 2008 ArbCom elections===
== ] archive ==
I have learned that ], ] and ] are considering to run for ArbCom in the ], and I would support all of them. I am looking for candidates who will ''resolve'' disputes, not simply to say that everyone needs to act kindly and give "hugs all around." I initially wrote a more detailed explanation, but this will suffice.


===Correcting mistakes by administrators===
The most recent archive you created seems to span 2007-8, but there is still a lot of material on the ] from 2007, and the stuff from 2008 all seems to be at the ''top'' of the page. Something seems to have gone wrong here, though I stopped watching this page in one of my increasingly regular cut-backs in the number of pages I watch. It seems to have become a bit of a shambles - there are many unanswered questions, stuff is out of order, the page needs archiving again... you can sort of understand why I promote page maintainers, no? ] (]) 06:10, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
If I were an administrator for a day, I would undertake the following actions to correct mistakes other administrators have made.
*{{Userlinks|Arthana}} should be unblocked. I have reviewed the allegation that he is a sockpuppet of ], who was indef-blocked for the same reason last year before Jimbo himself unblocked, and I find it unconvincing. Arthana was an innocent new user caught up in a false allegation of sockpuppetry - sadly, neither the first nor the last.
*{{Userlinks|AdultSwim}} (formerly Mitrebox and a few other names) should be unblocked if he agrees to limit himself to one user account and only bot accounts as approved at ]. Initially Mitrebox was indef-blocked in February for setting a bot to revert any edits to a certain page. The underlying issue of that edit-war has long since lost its real-world relevance, but Mitrebox never succeeded in getting unblocked, and when he tried to evade the block from his IP address and a series of new accounts, all those accounts got blocked for evasion even though his bot-assisted edits were largely beneficial. This case is an embarrassing example of administrator authority being taken too far. An administrator blocked Mitrebox and an adversary's account when the adversary engaged in an edit war spanning about 100 reversions (!) in three hours. Every time the adversary edited, Mitrebox's unauthorized bot automatically reverted with no explanation. Normally in a revert war both parties get blocked for the same amount of time. Upon discovering that Mitrebox used a malicious bot, admins ''indef-blocked'' Mitrebox "until assurances are given" that he won't use malicious bots anymore, and ''immediately unblocked'' the other guy who stubbornly edit-warred for three hours! Mitrebox, not understanding what "assurances" were asked of him, made up some silly unblock request accusing the administrator of "unclean hands," and was told that any further appeals of his block must go to ArbCom. Instead of pursuing that route, he started editing under his IP address, then under a series of new names. Aside from two short-term blocks for civility problems, these accounts were largely unobtrusive, and a normal user engaging in such behavior would face no danger of being banned. The initial decision to indef-block Mitrebox "until assurances are given" was a mistake - surely the admin did not expect Mitrebox to call his bluff, but once it happened, you would think that six months later, people might be willing to give the guy a fair chance instead of saying he should be banned forever, or requiring him to prove that he's ''not'' socking.
*Move ] back to ]. A pagemove messed up the page history, so that it appears people were carrying out discussions on Runcorn's userpage.
*Block a bunch of sockpuppet accounts that aren't active anyway, but I have a list in mind. In particular, Jimbo's unblock of ] was inappropriate and should be undone.


===Banning===
==]==
Users should not be banned trivially. Keep in mind that many of these people are young and may grow up someday. They should not be banned for the rest of their lives without first trying a one-year ban.
Done. Cheers, ] (]) 03:17, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


===Vandalism===
== ] ==
Vandalism is a continuing problem. I support any and all efforts that might be undertaken to curtail its insidious effects. Under my new account I stumbled across " from miami fl is a g!" at the top line of a major article. It had been there for 20 minutes. I can cite numerous examples where I removed vandalism that had lasted much longer. Misplaced Pages's openness to vandals is unprofessional. Any variant of stable versions that can curtail this scourge should be encouraged. I would even recommend requiring all users to login in order to edit. This would deter some vandals, and the overall cost-benefit analysis for anonymous editing is overwhelmingly negative. Even if login is required, Misplaced Pages is still the encyclopedia anyone can edit. Especially with single-user login enabled, I see no reason why Misplaced Pages can't take this very reasonable step. Imagine if a named user would vandalize Misplaced Pages one edit out of every ten or twenty or whatever the rate is - how long would he last? So why do we tolerate that vandalism rate from anonymous users as a whole? The amount of time wasted of good-faith contributors is unconscionable. If people simply stopped fighting vandalism and let it slide, maybe the foundation would recognize the problem. I am not optimistic.


===Closing===
This page is not deleted therefore a deletion review is moot. ] (]) 10:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
A user requested by email that I apologize to another user for saying bad things about her. I apologized privately but will not do so publicly. Apologies on Misplaced Pages are meaningless except as evidence to use against the fellow who apologized in later proceedings. However, I have removed from public view statements I made about that user that she found objectionable, so that will have to suffice.


I rambled much more than I had intended - this was intended for me to let go, not to keep posting loads of useless crap. Anyway, I'll stuff this in an archive box, and that will be the end.
== False Sockpuppet Accusation ==
<!-- ] -->|}
:Best of luck on your new account. –<span style="font-family:Verdana;">] (])</span> 19:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


:Hate to see you go, but I'm glad we can still count on your contributions, albeit under a new name. Good luck out there. ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 19:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Shalom, I have posted the following on the talk page of ] as well as the talk page of ]. I simply ask that you do what is fair. FYI, my home IP address was blocked shortly after my first post, so I was unable to write again for a few days after that post.
:"Rossami, I am writing to request help in mediating a matter involving a false accusation and the tarnishing of my reputation. I am a new user and my first post was here: ] regarding a Zulupad page. At the end of the deletion review log ] had the following to say about me:
::"Housekeeping note: Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Omeomi - There is legitimate suspicion, but no solid proof, that User:Cyber Shepherd may be a sockpuppet of User:Omeomi. Regardless, Cyber Shepherd has no edits outside this DRV and his userpage. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)"
:::Unless ] would like to prove or disprove this suggestion that I am a sockpuppet of ] by conducting a checkname or performing some other verification test, then I feel that
:::] should rescind his accusation. User ] also cast his doubts about my existence as a real person. Can these users either prove their case or redact their statements?
If this is not the correct place to request this kind of help, I apologize--I am new to WikiPedia. However, I am a real person, I do work at Teachers College, Columbia University, and I do intend to (attempt) to create and add positively to WikiPedia. Please help with this matter or least instruct me where a more appropriate forum for this kind of grievance might be. Many thanks." --] (]) 20:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


== Your recent edits ==
== ] ==


If you returned merely to move junk from your userspace into the mainspace and personally attack other editors... ]] 05:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello Shalom. Fraberj is already blocked indef. Isn't that appropriate? ] (]) 19:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
:Yes, I did. I have been waiting for the opportunity to finally be done with this place, and it came at the right time. On that note... ] (]) 20:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


==Right to vanish request==
== Reply ==


{{tl|helpme}}
{{talkback|Steve Crossin}}
{{talkback|Steve Crossin}}


Would an administrator please do the following:
==RFAR in re CSCWEM==
Hi. Per CSCWEM's contribs, I your statement at the Request for Arbitration to correct the date of CSCWEM's last edit from 2007 to 2008. FYI; I figured it was a simple enough change that you would not mind, but didn't want to do so without leaving a note - especially since it's Arbcom. Best, ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 23:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


{will post in a moment}
==My RFB==
Thank you for your comments in ]. Since it was only at 64%, it was a shoo-in to be unsuccessful, so I withdrew. I didn't want it to run until its scheduled close time because my intent in standing for RFB was to help the bureaucrats with their workload, not give them one more RfX to close. Through the course of my RFB, I received some very valuable feedback, some of it was contradictary, but other points were well agreed upon. I have ceased my admin coaching for now to give me time to revamp my method. I don't want to give up coaching completely, but I'm going to find a different angle from which to approach it. As for my ], I am going to do some deep intraspection. I wrote those standards six months ago and I will slowly retool them. This will take some time for me to really dig down and express what I want in an admin candidate. If, after some serious time of deep thought, I don't find anything to change in them, I'll leave them the way they are. I'm not going to change them just because of some community disagreement as to what they should be. Will I stand for RFB again in the future? I don't know. Perhaps some time down the road, when my tenure as an administrator is greater than one year, if there is a pressing need for more active bureaucrats, maybe. If there no pressing need, then maybe not. ] (]) 03:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


:Hovering nearby for when your list is ready. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 20:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
== Thanks ==


::Thanks, Hersfold.
Thanks for fixing up that sockpuppetry case. I've added an IP to it. I haven't used Twinkle to file a case before, but it appears to be broken (sockpuppets didn't get listed, notifications didn't get posted). I guess I go back to doing it manually... ] (]) 22:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)


*'''Delete''' redirect pages from my old user subpages and and the user talk subpages and .
:I just filed a about that same issue. Glad to know it's not just me. <sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 17:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' my user talk archive subpages and all other user talk subpages . Note that my talk page is structured so that archives are copy/paste. Therefore if you left me a comment last year you will still have it in your contribution log (something which I think is generally important to maintain as long as the user who left the comment is active, barring truly exceptional reasons to delete user talk history).
*'''Delete''' my user subpages, listed . Be careful that if the subpage is a redirect to a different namespace page, such as a Signpost article, you delete the redirect but keep the actual page it points to.
*'''Blank''' my userpage and delete the page history, which is several hundred revisions. I'm not sure how you want to do this, but when you're done there should be a single revision with an edit summary of "blanked the page" or similar, and nothing from beforehand. Leave the full protection in place.
*'''Blank and full-protect''' this talk page. Leave the revision history alone because, as above, I believe it benefits other people for it to stay, even though it does me no good.
*On a non-technical note, thank you for doing this. It is unfortunate - and despite what others might think, not entirely my own doing though certainly that was part of it - that my extensive contributions to the encyclopedia have been overshadowed by other issues which should have been forgotten long ago. I hope that as a result of my action, those issues actually will be forgotten.
*Unblock ]. I'm trolling now, but seriously, he is innocent, and I like to point it out whenever I can get people's attention. He is not the only innocent user who has been blocked, but to my knowledge he is one of the few who didn't manage to get unblocked. If my attempt to become an administrator had succeeded, I would have unblocked him.
*In the interest of disclosure, I will also ask for deletions of userpages belonging to other accounts I've operated. I will do this confidentailly through the proper channels, but I note here that it is being done.
*Goodbye, and I hope the work I did here will benefit people in the world out there. ] (]) 20:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


==Unreferenced BLPs==
== SIRCAMS ==
] Hello Shalom Yechiel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''1''' of the articles that you created is an ]. Please note that all biographies of living persons '''must be sourced'''. If you were to add ], ] ] to this article, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:


# ] - <small>{{findsources|Anneliese Seubert}}</small>
Hi, thanks for changing the name of SIRCAMS to it's extended acronym, but if you could change it back that'd be great. People only know it as SIRCAMS. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:No problem. ] (]) 17:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks!--] (]) 19:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


==Revision to ] and ] articles==
== Rabbinically prohibited activities of Shabbat ==


I noticed that you have revised either ] or ].
Just thought you may be interested in working on or somehow contributing to a new article I am in the process of constructing, ]. ] (]) 17:13, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


I intend to revise those articles following the ]. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.
== ] et al. sock puppet accusations ==


Thank you.
] has unilaterally deleted ]'s apology to me and your removal of my name from the list of "suspects" from the ] page. It is my personal opinion that she did this out of anger that I previously mentioned her name in the discussion. Can she arbitrarily make me a suspect again and erase an apology from the person who originally made the accusation? I responded to her charges, but I have dealt with her in the past over a controversy regarding the capitalization of certain forms of French royal styles at and fear that she has been prejudiced against me ever since. ] (]) 23:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
:I never thought you were anyone's sockpuppet to begin with, and I have not changed my mind. I can't answer the other problems right now. ] (]) 23:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
:::Yechiel: I have gone thru all the comments of the above dispute & noticed that after my (first) comment on 9 June following yours of 7 June, FactStraight's apology was deleted & BoBo's name was back on the list. I have no idea how this happened and was surprised when after reading the whole thing I saw BoBo's name back. At the time, I believed it had been done by an Administrator. I certainly do not remember erasing anyone's comment but, if I did, it was accidental. Please remove BoBo's name from list of suspected sock puppets. ] (]) 02:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


] (]) 19:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
== Moving forwards on SS7 article ==


==] nomination of ]==
Thanks for looking into the false sock puppet claim that was made against me. I wonder if you could be so kind as to offer advice on the ongoing dispute from which the sock puppet claim arose here ]? ] (]) 15:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
]<!-- use ] for YELLOW flag -->
{{Quote box
| quote = You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the ].'''''
| source = Thank you.
| width = 20%
| align = right
}}
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be ] from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please ]. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the ].


If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to the top of the article ('''just below''' the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on ''']''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines.
== TfD nomination of ] ==
] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 07:38, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria ], ], ], or ]. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.<!-- Template:Nn-warn --> <span style="font-family:Cambria;">] (])</span> 23:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
== Re: Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Jjonjonjon ==


== Re: Misplaced Pages Review post ==
Thanks for the note. I'm not really familiar with what needs to be done here. I'd suggest you contact the other admin who was working the case because I'm a bit new at this and not really certain what next steps ought to be. <sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 17:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


"...Fys/Dbiv/Sam Blacketer is sneaky and evasive but would not lie directly..."
:Whoops, sorry I wasn't clear. What I meant was I'm not too familiar with blocking socks that aren't actively disruptive if there hasn't been a check-user done. <sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 17:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


Not true. In response to a personal request, Mr. Boothroyd directly lied to me about his sockpuppetry, followed by a story which may or may not be true, but certainly did not explain the fact that the e-mail address attributed to him had no trace elsewhere that could be found. -JR ] (]) 00:53, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
::Understand, thanks for the tutorial. SSPs are new to me. Finishing now. <sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 17:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] - ] 21:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
== Re: ] ==
:'''This article is about a formerly unincorporated community; it's notability is nonexistant and anything notable that happens from this point forward should be placed within the Fayetteville article. There is no chance that this article can grow beyond this. ] (]) 13:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)'''


While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].
now? ] <small>]</small> 17:27, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
:You know what it was? Someone had added {{tl|archive}} to one of their reviews, but left it transcluded to the page. That template has the noeditsection thing to repress the edit sections. So that's why when I archived that one, it fixed it. Just saying so you know to look for that next time it comes up. Peace, ] <small>]</small> 17:38, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
==Totophi sockpuppets==
I was wondering if you were going to go ahead and close out the sockpuppet case/block Totophi. No one seems to have done anything in a while.] (]) 01:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 13:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
:Never mind. Matter resolved. Thank you for your help.] (]) 10:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


== RfA for davidwr redux == == coming back ==


Coming back <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Thanks for confirming the offer. As much as it would be handy to have tool access for some projects I'm working on, I'm going to hold off a bit before accepting your nomination. Thanks for ]. ]/<small><small>(])/(])/(])</small></small> 02:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ].


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">]]]</span> 11:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
== Amacmunn SSP ==
==] nomination of ]==
]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under two or more of the ], by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
* It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See ].) Please read ] and ] for more information.
*It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, ''etc.''), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See ].) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please ].


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. ] (]) 16:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks . I'm learning my way in that arena and feedback is good. And I just realised this was a new account name and i knew you under ] so nice to "see" you again. <sub>]</sub><sup>]</sup> 13:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
== Terror attack listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Terror attack'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> - ''']''' <sup>(]) (]) (]) </sup> 08:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== RReagan007 ==
I do not deny that I sometimes edit from that IP address instead of logging in, but I do not do that for bad purposes. Usually I either just forget to log in, or I have several different browsers open and I'm logged in on 1 browser and just don't remember to log into the other 1. I have looked at the talk page for the IP address and I do see the negitive stuff you are referring to. But none of the vandalism from this IP address was done by me. I did not even start editing wikipedia articles at all until January of this year, and the vandalism I saw was all from before that. I'm also not familiar with how IP addresses work, but it might be possible that more than 1 person shares this IP address. Again, I have never intentionally vandalised any wikipedia page, and none of the edits from this IP address could have been done by me before January 2008. If you have any questions about this for me please feel free to ask. ] (]) 14:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 17:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
== ] ==
==] nomination of ]==
]


A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
Hi there, I think the user is back again despite his community ban. The new user ] was created at 14:55 today, just two hours after his latest sockpuppet ] had his unblock refused. The new user has so far:
* Referred to ] on their talk page, who was the first person to bring a sockpuppetry case against ].
* Admitted that they are a sockpuppet account, albeit with claims that they will behave themselves this time.
* Continued a thread at ], which ] started
* Used very similar spelling/grammatical errors to previous incarnations.


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 02:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Despite the user's insistence that they are making a clean start, this is clearly a block evasion. Do you think it's worth taking this to checkuser? I don't think we'll have much luck with the ban if it's already been broken after 2 hours! ] (]) 16:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
==Orphaned non-free image File:Hillel Yaffe Medical Center logo.png==
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
== Hdayejr Confirmed! ==
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
To save you of going to the page, I'll just transclude it for you below. Also, seems Landofpartinggifts was also a sock of mine. Had me fooled.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 11:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
=== ] ===
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
{{rfcu box|case=Hdayejr|filed=21:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)}}
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].
* {{checkuser|Hdayejr}}<!--Please do not edit this line-->
* {{checkip|65.31.32.222}}
* {{checkip|68.29.177.155}}
* {{checkip|68.29.192.218}}
* {{checkip|68.29.201.137}}
* {{checkip|68.31.102.232‎}}
* {{checkip|70.14.87.157}}
* {{checkip|70.9.23.81}}
* {{checkip|70.9.237.26}}
* {{checkip|70.9.243.200‎}}
* {{checkip|71.62.241.139}}
* {{checkip|72.59.120.112}}
* {{checkip|72.60.209.103}}
* {{checkip|74.249.0.73}}
* {{checkip|98.192.44.39}}
* {{checkip|99.201.216.124}}
* {{checkip|99.205.195.159}}
* {{checkip|99.205.236.49}}


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
* ''']:''' F


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> – ] (]) 05:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
* '''Supporting evidence:'''
==Your draft article, ]==
]


Hello, Shalom Yechiel. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]".
This list was taken from ]. The evidence for each IPs inclusion in the list is as per their contributions which show a style of editing similar to that of the banned sock master.


In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia ], the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at ]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
The most recent IP to surface is ]. Please note this where the IP in question makes a remark about another editor which the sock master has been known to constantly harrass, to the page of one of his previous IP socks.— '''<font color="Green">]</font>]'''<sup>]</sup> <big>'''/'''</big><small>'''<sub> ]</sub></small><span style="position: relative; left:-33px; margin-right:-33px;"><small><sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small></span>''' 21:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 17:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
*{{confirmed}}. also {{userlinks|Landofpartinggifts}}. ] 14:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<!-- BEGIN ARCHIVE TEMPLATE -->
<blockquote>'''WP:TNT - not much more than a list of unsourced red links (also created by a sockpuppet).'''</blockquote>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
That's a load off my mind... at least for the moment. Happy blocking!— '''<font color="Green">]</font>]'''<sup>]</sup> <big>'''/'''</big><small>'''<sub> ]</sub></small><span style="position: relative; left:-33px; margin-right:-33px;"><small><sup><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small></span>''' 21:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
== Thank you ==


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
For dealing with my case so patiently and understandingly :) ]]] 21:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
:You may also be interested to know that Jack Forbes (the person who nominated me for sockpuppetery), has accused you of being an ]. This is a personal attack, and I suggest a temporary block or warning for that behaviour alone, but this, coupled with the fact that the user seems to have an inibility to accept any oppinions other than his own, and has been continuing this abuse for a while now would suggest to me a potentially longer block. Cheers. --]]] 22:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:30, 25 December 2023

Archiving icon
Archives

Index of archives


Shalom also means "goodbye"

I am leaving English Misplaced Pages and all Wikimedia projects. After I relocate in August, I will create a new username.

Misplaced Pages is causing me more stress than it's worth. After discussing my options by email correspondence with three administrators this week, I have decided to leave.

I created a rant about 60 kilobytes long on my computer to complain about how unfairly the community treated me. I will not post it. That's not how I wish to be remembered.

I'd like you to read one article I've written or improved during the last two and a half years. Pick any article from my list or the toolserver's list. That's how I wish to be remembered.

Shalom also means "goodbye." I offer best wishes to everyone who made editing here such a pleasant and fulfilling experience. Yechiel (Shalom) 15:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

This series of discussions has been archived.
The following is an archived debate. Please do not modify it.

Your ER

If you happen to see this, i have left more comments and added some questions. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 01:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Everyking

EK has a penchant for re-writing history in his favor. See this. Take what he says with a grain of salt. Raul654 (talk) 05:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Second Annual WikiNYC Picnic

Greetings! You are invited to attend the second annual New York picnic on August 24! This year, it will be taking place in the Long Meadow of Prospect Park in Brooklyn. If you plan on coming, please sign up and be sure to bring something! Please be sure to come!
You have received this automated delivery because your name was on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 20:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikis Take Manhattan

Wikis Take Manhattan


Next: Saturday September 27
This box: view • talk • edit

WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Misplaced Pages and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City. The event is based on last year's Misplaced Pages Takes Manhattan, and has evolved to include StreetsWiki this year as well.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT

WINNINGS? Prizes include a dinner for three with Misplaced Pages creator Jimmy Wales at Pure Food & Wine, gift certificates to Bicycle Habitiat and the LimeWire Store, and more!

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, September 27th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's West Village office. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:

349 W. 12th St. #3
Between Greenwich & Washington Streets
By the 14th St./8th Ave. ACE/L stop

FOR UPDATES

Check out:

This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,

Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Misplaced Pages:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Epilogue

I am writing to say goodbye to those of you who still watchlist my talk page, and to offer a chance for you to wish me well. One of the hardest things about moving on from a relationship is forgetting the painful memories and the lost hopes associated with that relationship. I accomplished many achievements here, but I never helped the project as an administrator (though I performed administrative tasks without the tool-set); I never submitted a featured article (though I did submit a good article at Talk:Endgame tablebase); and I never completed coverage of towns and villages in Israel (though I did create more than 100 articles about these places). I am proud of what I did, broadly speaking, and for my mistakes and failures, I am trying to retain whatever lessons I can apply to life outside the four walls of Misplaced Pages.

Last year I spent an extraordinary amount of time on Misplaced Pages. Without revealing too much personal information, I'll explain that I was working freelance part-time but I had most of my waking hours to spend at my discretion, and I donated that time to the project. Two months ago I relocated and began graduate school in the chemistry department of a major research university on the east coast of the United States. (You can read my admission essay at User:Shalom Yechiel/Drafts and archives/Wikipedia got me into graduate school.) My teaching and learning responsibilities do not permit anything more than a cursory interest in Misplaced Pages, and sometimes not even that. Last month I created an anonymous user account for editing and creating articles related to chemistry. Yechiel (Shalom) 19:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

My thoughts on various issues
The following is an archived debate. Please do not modify it.

I wish to leave my thoughts on various issues that I expect will engage the community's attention during the next months and years.

Honesty is the best policy

Misplaced Pages:Honesty is marked as an essay, not even a guideline. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Honesty where someone had the gumption to suggest Wikipedians should abide by such a basic ethical principle. "Honesty is the best policy," according to a popular saying, and honesty should be required of all users on Misplaced Pages. Making baseless accusations against another user is unacceptable. Misrepresenting your real-world credentials is unacceptable. Misrepresenting the content or intent of sources is unacceptable. Misplaced Pages:Honesty should be at least a behavioral guideline on par with Misplaced Pages:Civility.

RFA reform

I support the efforts of Gazimoff and others in the RFA review. I have spent many hours thinking about what might discourage users from engaging in the false statements, assumptions of bad faith, and borderline personal attacks that pushed my temper over the edge in July. I prefer not to discuss my particular case anymore, but I recognize it as a wider problem. I perceive that RFA has become a toxic environment, one where false statements, assumptions of bad faith, and borderline personal attacks are tolerated as the price of vetting candidates for the stressful situations that some administrators may face. Standards of conduct from RFA commenters need to improve: users who can maintain neutrality in a particular RFA discussion should watch for comments that cross the line and not be shy about challenging them, and if necessary, asking a bureaucrat to remove or disregard them.

Administrator accountability

I support the proposal for bureaucrats to remove adminship after suitable discussion. I don't understand all the details, but the delays in recent arbitrations cases have shown clearly that the community needs a functioning process for removing administrators by a vote of no confidence. In the C68-FM-SV arbitration case, 16 users (including me) supported a proposal to desysop one of the parties, while only four opposed and one was ambivalent: by RFA standards this counts as consensus, yet not a single arbitrator submitted the desysop proposal for consideration. (It's possible that the commenters at the ArbCom workshop were biased, but I don't think so: most of them were not significantly involved in the case except as observers.) The community logically holds the power to remove admins as it does to promote them; it should be able to exercise that power if needed. The benefits would be a streamlined process, lasting one to two weeks instead of four months, and a confidence that adminship will again be not such a big deal because anyone can be demoted almost as easily as they were promoted.

Jimbo's role

I would like User:Jimbo Wales to resign or limit his special powers to ban or unban, promote or desysop, appoint or remove from ArbCom, etc. I never granted him these powers, and I do not think he has used them wisely enough to justify retaining them. I support Sarcasticidealist's effort to clarify the role of Jimmy Wales on Misplaced Pages. Just recently Jimbo wrote on the page for preparing the 2008 ArbCom elections that he would retain the power to appoint any candidate who receives 50% or more of the vote, even to promote a candidate at 51% and reject another candidate at 80%. There is no justification for one man to veto the wishes of hundreds of voters. Misplaced Pages is not a democracy, but when it pretends to be one, the pretense should be legitimately founded. I won't resign in protest if Jimbo appoints the wrong candidates to ArbCom, but I can voice my displeasure in advance, and I am doing that now.

I should note in passing that Hebrew Misplaced Pages, where I participated in community affairs for a short time, functions just fine without an absentee figurehead deciding critical issues once or a few times every year. Other large Wikipedias and sister projects also function as well or better without Jimbo or even an Arbitration Committee. English Misplaced Pages really does need the Arbitration Committee, but it does not need Jimbo's role.

Candidates for the 2008 ArbCom elections

I have learned that Rlevse, WJBscribe and Sam Korn are considering to run for ArbCom in the 2008 elections, and I would support all of them. I am looking for candidates who will resolve disputes, not simply to say that everyone needs to act kindly and give "hugs all around." I initially wrote a more detailed explanation, but this will suffice.

Correcting mistakes by administrators

If I were an administrator for a day, I would undertake the following actions to correct mistakes other administrators have made.

  • Arthana (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) should be unblocked. I have reviewed the allegation that he is a sockpuppet of User:Coldmachine, who was indef-blocked for the same reason last year before Jimbo himself unblocked, and I find it unconvincing. Arthana was an innocent new user caught up in a false allegation of sockpuppetry - sadly, neither the first nor the last.
  • AdultSwim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (formerly Mitrebox and a few other names) should be unblocked if he agrees to limit himself to one user account and only bot accounts as approved at WP:BRFA. Initially Mitrebox was indef-blocked in February for setting a bot to revert any edits to a certain page. The underlying issue of that edit-war has long since lost its real-world relevance, but Mitrebox never succeeded in getting unblocked, and when he tried to evade the block from his IP address and a series of new accounts, all those accounts got blocked for evasion even though his bot-assisted edits were largely beneficial. This case is an embarrassing example of administrator authority being taken too far. An administrator blocked Mitrebox and an adversary's account when the adversary engaged in an edit war spanning about 100 reversions (!) in three hours. Every time the adversary edited, Mitrebox's unauthorized bot automatically reverted with no explanation. Normally in a revert war both parties get blocked for the same amount of time. Upon discovering that Mitrebox used a malicious bot, admins indef-blocked Mitrebox "until assurances are given" that he won't use malicious bots anymore, and immediately unblocked the other guy who stubbornly edit-warred for three hours! Mitrebox, not understanding what "assurances" were asked of him, made up some silly unblock request accusing the administrator of "unclean hands," and was told that any further appeals of his block must go to ArbCom. Instead of pursuing that route, he started editing under his IP address, then under a series of new names. Aside from two short-term blocks for civility problems, these accounts were largely unobtrusive, and a normal user engaging in such behavior would face no danger of being banned. The initial decision to indef-block Mitrebox "until assurances are given" was a mistake - surely the admin did not expect Mitrebox to call his bluff, but once it happened, you would think that six months later, people might be willing to give the guy a fair chance instead of saying he should be banned forever, or requiring him to prove that he's not socking.
  • Move User:Runcorn back to User talk:Runcorn. A pagemove messed up the page history, so that it appears people were carrying out discussions on Runcorn's userpage.
  • Block a bunch of sockpuppet accounts that aren't active anyway, but I have a list in mind. In particular, Jimbo's unblock of User:Sweet Blue Water was inappropriate and should be undone.

Banning

Users should not be banned trivially. Keep in mind that many of these people are young and may grow up someday. They should not be banned for the rest of their lives without first trying a one-year ban.

Vandalism

Vandalism is a continuing problem. I support any and all efforts that might be undertaken to curtail its insidious effects. Under my new account I stumbled across " from miami fl is a g!" at the top line of a major article. It had been there for 20 minutes. I can cite numerous examples where I removed vandalism that had lasted much longer. Misplaced Pages's openness to vandals is unprofessional. Any variant of stable versions that can curtail this scourge should be encouraged. I would even recommend requiring all users to login in order to edit. This would deter some vandals, and the overall cost-benefit analysis for anonymous editing is overwhelmingly negative. Even if login is required, Misplaced Pages is still the encyclopedia anyone can edit. Especially with single-user login enabled, I see no reason why Misplaced Pages can't take this very reasonable step. Imagine if a named user would vandalize Misplaced Pages one edit out of every ten or twenty or whatever the rate is - how long would he last? So why do we tolerate that vandalism rate from anonymous users as a whole? The amount of time wasted of good-faith contributors is unconscionable. If people simply stopped fighting vandalism and let it slide, maybe the foundation would recognize the problem. I am not optimistic.

Closing

A user requested by email that I apologize to another user for saying bad things about her. I apologized privately but will not do so publicly. Apologies on Misplaced Pages are meaningless except as evidence to use against the fellow who apologized in later proceedings. However, I have removed from public view statements I made about that user that she found objectionable, so that will have to suffice.

I rambled much more than I had intended - this was intended for me to let go, not to keep posting loads of useless crap. Anyway, I'll stuff this in an archive box, and that will be the end.

Best of luck on your new account. –xeno (talk) 19:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Hate to see you go, but I'm glad we can still count on your contributions, albeit under a new name. Good luck out there. EVula // talk // // 19:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

If you returned merely to move junk from your userspace into the mainspace and personally attack other editors... Enigma 05:32, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I did. I have been waiting for the opportunity to finally be done with this place, and it came at the right time. On that note... Yechiel (Shalom) 20:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Right to vanish request

{{helpme}}

Would an administrator please do the following:

{will post in a moment}

Hovering nearby for when your list is ready. Hersfold 20:34, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Hersfold.
  • Delete redirect pages from my old user subpages and and the user talk subpages and .
  • Delete my user talk archive subpages and all other user talk subpages . Note that my talk page is structured so that archives are copy/paste. Therefore if you left me a comment last year you will still have it in your contribution log (something which I think is generally important to maintain as long as the user who left the comment is active, barring truly exceptional reasons to delete user talk history).
  • Delete my user subpages, listed here. Be careful that if the subpage is a redirect to a different namespace page, such as a Signpost article, you delete the redirect but keep the actual page it points to.
  • Blank my userpage and delete the page history, which is several hundred revisions. I'm not sure how you want to do this, but when you're done there should be a single revision with an edit summary of "blanked the page" or similar, and nothing from beforehand. Leave the full protection in place.
  • Blank and full-protect this talk page. Leave the revision history alone because, as above, I believe it benefits other people for it to stay, even though it does me no good.
  • On a non-technical note, thank you for doing this. It is unfortunate - and despite what others might think, not entirely my own doing though certainly that was part of it - that my extensive contributions to the encyclopedia have been overshadowed by other issues which should have been forgotten long ago. I hope that as a result of my action, those issues actually will be forgotten.
  • Unblock User:Arthana. I'm trolling now, but seriously, he is innocent, and I like to point it out whenever I can get people's attention. He is not the only innocent user who has been blocked, but to my knowledge he is one of the few who didn't manage to get unblocked. If my attempt to become an administrator had succeeded, I would have unblocked him.
  • In the interest of disclosure, I will also ask for deletions of userpages belonging to other accounts I've operated. I will do this confidentailly through the proper channels, but I note here that it is being done.
  • Goodbye, and I hope the work I did here will benefit people in the world out there. Yechiel (Shalom) 20:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Shalom Yechiel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 13 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Anneliese Seubert - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 19:56, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Camp Moshava (Bnei Akiva)

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Camp Moshava (Bnei Akiva) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Misplaced Pages guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Abductive (reasoning) 23:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Misplaced Pages Review post

"...Fys/Dbiv/Sam Blacketer is sneaky and evasive but would not lie directly..."

Not true. In response to a personal request, Mr. Boothroyd directly lied to me about his sockpuppetry, followed by a story which may or may not be true, but certainly did not explain the fact that the e-mail address attributed to him had no trace elsewhere that could be found. -JR 64.250.228.220 (talk) 00:53, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chess notation

Template:Chess notation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 21:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fenix, North Carolina

The article Fenix, North Carolina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is about a formerly unincorporated community; it's notability is nonexistant and anything notable that happens from this point forward should be placed within the Fayetteville article. There is no chance that this article can grow beyond this. Ncboy2010 (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ncboy2010 (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

coming back

Coming back — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faraone Lk (talkcontribs) 16:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chinese-American Chemical Society

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chinese-American Chemical Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Launchballer 11:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of CEDARLANE

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CEDARLANE, requesting that it be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Compassionate727 (talk) 16:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Terror attack listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Terror attack. Since you had some involvement with the Terror attack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION 08:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Camp Moshava for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Moshava is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Camp Moshava until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chief rabbis of Ireland

A tag has been placed on Category:Chief rabbis of Ireland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hillel Yaffe Medical Center logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hillel Yaffe Medical Center logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of ChessCafe.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ChessCafe.com is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/ChessCafe.com (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lynndonald (talk) 11:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of ICGA Journal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ICGA Journal is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/ICGA Journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 05:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hyper Poland

Hello, Shalom Yechiel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hyper Poland".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 17:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of HaAyin HaShevi'it

Notice

The article HaAyin HaShevi'it has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT - not much more than a list of unsourced red links (also created by a sockpuppet).

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Endgame tablebase

Endgame tablebase has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)