Misplaced Pages

User:Banno: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:32, 29 August 2005 edit172.198.187.141 (talk) Stop deleting the comments of others. Are you one of Banno's meatpuppets?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:52, 23 September 2024 edit undoBanno (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,532 edits Delete old linkTag: Visual edit 
(97 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Sockpuppet|1=CesarB|evidence=EVIDENCE}}
Evidence:

{| width=300 align=right bgcolor="#fffff6" style="border: 1px solid gray; padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; margin:1em 1em 1em 1em" {| width=300 align=right bgcolor="#fffff6" style="border: 1px solid gray; padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; margin:1em 1em 1em 1em"
| |
Line 10: Line 7:
Donald Davidson, ''On the very idea of a conceptual schema'', in ''Inquiries into truth an interpretation'', Ch. 13 Donald Davidson, ''On the very idea of a conceptual schema'', in ''Inquiries into truth an interpretation'', Ch. 13


]|
----

|
] | ] |
] | ] |
Line 18: Line 13:
for {{PAGENAME}} for {{PAGENAME}}


==Links== ==Tools==
{{PhilosophyOfLanguageTasksBox}}
{| border="1" align="center" style="background:#ffdead;"
The current date and time is: {{mono|{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)}}
|-
===Admin:===
|'''Playing with:'''
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


===Style===
|
*]
'''Keep an eye on:'''
*]
*]
*]


===Policies===
*]
*]
*]


===Editing:===
|
*]
'''Old stuff'''
* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]

|-
|
* ''']'''
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ] (now mostly at ])
:* ]
:* ]

|
* ''']'''
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
::*]
:* ] and ]
:* ]

|
* '''General Philosophy'''
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
:* ]
|}

==Tools==

*]
*] *]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*] *]
*] *]
*]
*]

{{LogicTasksBox}}
===Help===
*] *]
*] *]
Line 88: Line 56:
*] *]
*] *]

*]
===Other tools:===
*]
*
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*] *]
*] *]
*

===Things to do, some time...===
Write an article on Stove's ]

== A much deserved award ==

<div style="float:left; margin-right:1em">]</div>

Banno - For your persistence and effort in the recent affair, I award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Your hard work does not go unnoticed or unappreciated. --best, kevin <span style="color:#BBBBBB;">·</span><span style="color:#666666;">·</span>·<small>] | ]</small>·<span style="color:#666666;">·</span><span style="color:#BBBBBB;">·</span> 02:52, September 13, 2005 (UTC)
<br clear="left"/>

] to ] for taking on the impossible task of trying to '''administer''' a Web encyclopedia which is defined by almost-complete-anarchy, constant quarreling, edit wars, and other irresponsible madness <BR> ] 00:43, 13 March 2006]]

] ] - beware the power! ]]
===Who's a naughty boy...===
An ] against me...


==An aid to criticism== ==An aid to criticism==
You are welcome to add your own to this list...


''Some people think…''; ''Some people think…'';
Line 109: Line 95:
means ''I couldn’t be bothered doing a decent job on this bit'' means ''I couldn’t be bothered doing a decent job on this bit''


''In fact, (followed by some statement)'' ''In fact...'', or ''The fact that...(followed by some statement)''
means that the statement is certainly wrong. means that the statement is certainly wrong.


Line 115: Line 101:
Means ''I havn’t read it, so I’ll just make this next bit up…''. Means ''I havn’t read it, so I’ll just make this next bit up…''.


''Controversial'' means ''I don't like it, but cannot figure out quite why''.


''Arguably'' means ''I'm afraid you'll argue this point, so I'll say arguably in hopes I can slip it by.''
==NPOV==


''Surely...'' means ''I think that...''
A discussion of the merits of NPOV - and an interesting little bit of analytic philosophy: ]

''we all know that...'' means ''I know this is wrong, but I want to see if I can slip it past you...''

===Key conceptual tools===
''']:''' Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

===People of note===
''']''', who first systematised psycoceramics.

===The wisdom of the editors===
*''Certainly there is such a thing as false knowledge.''
*'']'' is a "Non-notable essay, no assertion of notability" and although Russell "is apparently notable himself" - ].
* Wittgenstein couldn't spell<!-- Of course, this is really down to Anscombe... -->
* Nor could Hume


==Things to remember== ==Things to remember==


Things I only use once in a blue moon, but need to look for when I do... Things I only use once in a blue moon, but need to look for when I do...
* <nowiki>{{userlinks|name}}</nowiki>

* <nowiki>{{Discussion top|1=reason}}</nowiki> <br>
:<nowiki>{{Discussion bottom}}</nowiki>
* <nowiki>{{banned}}</nowiki>
* <nowiki>{{subst:prod|reason}} and {{subst:PRODWarning|Article}}</nowiki>
* <nowiki> <!-- comment here --> </nowiki> * <nowiki> <!-- comment here --> </nowiki>
* <nowiki> <nowiki> </nowiki> * <nowiki> <nowiki> </nowiki>
* <nowiki> {{philo-stub}} </nowiki> * <nowiki> {{philo-stub}} </nowiki>
* <nowiki> {{philosophy}} </nowiki> * <nowiki> {{philosophy}} </nowiki>
* <nowiki> {{main2|Article 1|Article 2}} </nowiki> - the number indictes number of articles... * <nowiki> {{main2|Article 1|Article 2}} </nowiki> - the number indicates number of articles...
* <nowiki>:I also suggest, even if you only want to edit occasionally, that you ], so you can access some more editing tools. See ]</nowiki>
----
* <nowiki> {{clarify}} </nowiki>
The trouble with the Wiki is that people with half a mind to make an edit often do.
----
] ]

Never work with children or animals. The Wiki contains plenty of both. Increasingly, one is obliged to clean up after the animals and write for the children. Is it worth it?
{{Userpage}}
----
Misplaced Pages is testimony to the power of ]. Everyone making a contribution ought really to be doing something else - So stop reading this and get back to work.

Latest revision as of 09:52, 23 September 2024

WikiProject Philosophy task list

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

  • Optimism should have a separate page that focuses on the philosophical idea of optimism and distinguishes the philosophical view from "positive thinking" and other everyday uses of the word.
  • Philosophy of social science, has some okay points but requires elaboration on Wittgenstein and Winch, perhaps other linguistic critiques, whether logical positivist or postmodernist.
  • Exchange value needs to be redone, it shouldn't be under 'Marxist theory'- although it's an important component of Marxist theory it's also vital for all economics. That said the article's weight on Marx is also absurd.
  • German Idealism and the articles related to it may need to be rewritten or expanded to avoid undue weight on Arthur Schopenhauer.
  • Protected values first section confuses right action and values and needs a copy edit, moving and wikifying
  • Quality (philosophy) needs a more clear explanation.
  • Socratic dialogues could do with some tidying and clarification. See the talk page for one suggested change.
  • Problem of universals: The introductory definition is (perhaps) fixed. But, the article is poor. Check out the German version.
  • Teleology: the article is shallow and inconsistent.
  • Existentialism: the quality of this article varies wildly and is in desperate need of expert attention.
  • Analytic philosophy This is a very major topic, but still has several sections which are stubs, and several topics which are not covered.
  • Lifeworld A philosophical concept that seems to have fallen exclusively into the hands of the sociologists. Could use some attention; it's a major and complex issue in phenomenology.
  • Perception Needs the attention of philosophically minded Wikipedians. This is only the start of an overhaul of perception and related articles.
Edit this list | To do | stubs | Article alerts | Cleanup listing | Category | Portal | RFC | Deletion | Requested articles | Discussion

We make maximum sense of the words and thoughts of others when we interpret in a way that optimises agreement

Donald Davidson, On the very idea of a conceptual schema, in Inquiries into truth an interpretation, Ch. 13

wikibooks:User:Banno| Wiktionary:User:Banno | Wikimedia:user:Banno | PhiloWiki all logs for Banno

Tools

WikiProject Philosophy of Language task list
Vote | Larry's Text | stubs | edit this list | discuss these tasks | Category:Philosophy | Portal:Philosophy | RFC

The current date and time is: 11:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Admin:

Style

Policies

Editing:

WikiProject Logic task list
  • This list should be actively updated: Discuss


Help

Other tools:

Things to do, some time...

Write an article on Stove's worst argument in the world

A much deserved award

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

Banno - For your persistence and effort in the recent affair, I award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Your hard work does not go unnoticed or unappreciated. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 02:52, September 13, 2005 (UTC)

I award the Star of Sophia Barnstar to Banno for taking on the impossible task of trying to administer a Web encyclopedia which is defined by almost-complete-anarchy, constant quarreling, edit wars, and other irresponsible madness
Lacatosias 00:43, 13 March 2006
Admin star, from an Aztec Stone of the Sun - beware the power!

Who's a naughty boy...

An RfC against me...

An aid to criticism

You are welcome to add your own to this list...

Some people think…; Some say that…; means I think this next bit is wrong.

Most people think…; Experts agree that…; means I think this next bit is right.

Essentially, (followed by a trite explanation) means I couldn’t be bothered doing a decent job on this bit

In fact..., or The fact that...(followed by some statement) means that the statement is certainly wrong.

Anyone who has read the topic (or book or author) will know that… Means I havn’t read it, so I’ll just make this next bit up….

Controversial means I don't like it, but cannot figure out quite why.

Arguably means I'm afraid you'll argue this point, so I'll say arguably in hopes I can slip it by.

Surely... means I think that...

we all know that... means I know this is wrong, but I want to see if I can slip it past you...

Key conceptual tools

Hanlon's razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.

People of note

Josiah S. Carberry, who first systematised psycoceramics.

The wisdom of the editors

  • Certainly there is such a thing as false knowledge.
  • Why I Am Not a Christian is a "Non-notable essay, no assertion of notability" and although Russell "is apparently notable himself" - it should be deleted.
  • Wittgenstein couldn't spell
  • Nor could Hume

Things to remember

Things I only use once in a blue moon, but need to look for when I do...

  • {{userlinks|name}}
  • {{Discussion top|1=reason}}
{{Discussion bottom}}
  • {{banned}}
  • {{subst:prod|reason}} and {{subst:PRODWarning|Article}}
  • <!-- comment here -->
  • <nowiki>
  • {{philo-stub}}
  • {{philosophy}}
  • {{main2|Article 1|Article 2}} - the number indicates number of articles...
  • :I also suggest, even if you only want to edit occasionally, that you ], so you can access some more editing tools. See ]
  • {{clarify}}

archive

Banno
Misplaced Pages editor
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Banno.