Revision as of 18:38, 30 June 2008 editGiano II (talk | contribs)22,233 edits →Right reasons← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:59, 26 June 2023 edit undoFastily (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled100,543 edits cleaned up bot spamTag: Replaced | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
__TOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right;margin-right:0.9em"> | |||
] | |||
</div> | |||
Old messages are at | |||
*] (2004) | |||
*] (2005) | |||
*] (2005) | |||
*] (2006) | |||
*] (2006) | |||
*] (2007) | |||
*] (2007) | |||
*] (2008) | |||
*] (2008) | |||
*Essay: | |||
== Please leave new messages below == | |||
== Right reasons == | |||
Yes, I think that Rockpocket blocked <He is talking about me ] (]) 18:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)> for the right reasons. At the time, he ''believed'' that | |||
*the comments he removed represented harrassment of another editor; | |||
*he was acting within policy to remove those comments and warn against their replacement; | |||
*he didn't think that the harrassment would cease without a block; | |||
*a block in that situation was appropriate and well within accepted practice; and | |||
*he was acting in the best interests of the project. | |||
Was he correct in all of those beliefs? Nope. The result? Bad block, good reasons. | |||
I assume the irony of yelling at me to "shut my ill-informed mouth" and in the same breath warning ''me'' against creating further drama isn't lost on you. If you have something further to say to me, feel free to visit my talk page. There's no need for additional bickering in Rockpocket's userspace. ](]) 15:46, 30 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Do you know? I really could not care less WTF you think. You are ill-informed and rather ignorant. It's a pity, but there is not a lot I can do about that. If you are hoping I am going to enter into debate with you, and thus create more drama you are mistaken. Now run along and find something productive to do outside in the nice fresh air. ] (]) 18:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:59, 26 June 2023
Redirect to: