Misplaced Pages

:Suspected sock puppets/TheYieldCurve: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:40, 12 July 2008 editCumulus Clouds (talk | contribs)6,434 edits User:TheYieldCurve← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:41, 27 July 2008 edit undoSQL (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators28,464 edits User:TheYieldCurve: close as block the lot. 
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
{{SSPa}}
;Suspected sockpuppeteer ;Suspected sockpuppeteer
{{user5|1=TheYieldCurve}}<br> {{user5|1=TheYieldCurve}}<br>
Line 12: Line 13:
various other IPs various other IPs


<!--If there are additional suspected sockpuppets to be included, add them above this comment using the form {{user5|1=SOCKPUPPET}}<br>, replacing SOCKPUPPET in each case with the user name that you suspect is a sockpuppet of the puppetmaster. (Leave out the "User:" prefix.) Leave the <br> tag after each one and add or remove lines as necessary. Remove this comment once completed. --> <!--If there are additional suspected sockpuppets to be included, add them above this comment using the form {{user5|1=SOCKPUPPET}}<br>, replacing SOCKPUPPET in each case with the user name that you suspect is a sockpuppet of the puppetmaster. (Leave out the "User:" prefix.) Leave the <br> tag after each one and add or remove lines as necessary. Remove this comment once completed. -->


;Report submission by ;Report submission by
Line 25: Line 26:


;Comments ;Comments
Yes, this is an open-and-shut case. All user accounts are clearly the same person, and all should be indef-blocked. It might be worthwhile to do a checkuser to find if there are sleepers or if this is an established user in disguise. ] (]) 19:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)



;Conclusions ;Conclusions
Seems pretty clear to me as well. Going to block the lot. ]] 08:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)



---- ----

Latest revision as of 08:41, 27 July 2008

User:TheYieldCurve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
Suspected sockpuppeteer

TheYieldCurve (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

LogIn2CreateAccount (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
CumvIvs CIouds (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
MaxweIISmarter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
206.53.144.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
216.9.250.114 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
various other IPs


Report submission by

Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

This is pretty open and shut, this account registered after questions were made about the edits of the IP to IndyMac Bank, which removed sources from that article. TheYieldCurve then registered and removed the same sources as the IP had done earlier. A comment on the page of that user was subsequently removed, and the IP left a comment on my talk page followed by a comment as their user account. The IP would later remark in an edit summary about the sockpuppetry notice left on the talk page of TheYieldCurve and their comments on mine, which I removed. User:LogIn2CreateAccount then registered and began restoring the refactored comments. Once these were removed again, the IP followed suit.

Ditto on User:CumvIvs CIouds and User:MaxweIISmarter

Comments

Yes, this is an open-and-shut case. All user accounts are clearly the same person, and all should be indef-blocked. It might be worthwhile to do a checkuser to find if there are sleepers or if this is an established user in disguise. Yechiel (Shalom) 19:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Conclusions

Seems pretty clear to me as well. Going to block the lot. SQL 08:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC)