Revision as of 16:33, 13 July 2008 editJLogan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers17,959 edits →Historical enlargements: wikilinked inner six← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:44, 20 December 2024 edit undoSouieba (talk | contribs)24 edits →Potential enlargements | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Accession of new countries to the EU}} | |||
{| align="right" style="margin-left:8px; background-color:#f9f9f9; padding:3px; border: 1px solid #cccccc; font-size:90%" | |||
{{pp-move}} | |||
|<div style="line-height:90%">1957:<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]</div> | |||
{{EngvarB|date=November 2022}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2022}} | |||
] | |||
---- | |||
The ] (EU) has expanded a number of times throughout its history by way of the accession of new ] to the Union. To join the EU, a state needs to fulfil economic and political conditions called the ] (named after the ] summit in June 1993), which require a stable democratic government that respects the rule of law, and its corresponding freedoms and institutions. According to the ], each current member state and the ] must agree to any enlargement. The process of enlargement is sometimes referred to as ]. This term is also used to refer to the intensification of co-operation between EU member states as national governments allow for the gradual harmonisation of national laws. | |||
<div style="line-height:95%">1973:<br />]<br />]<br />]</div> | |||
The EU's predecessor, the ],<ref>Current Article 1 of the ] reads:"The Union shall be founded on the present Treaty and on the ]. Those ] shall have the same legal value. The Union shall replace and succeed the ]".</ref> was founded with the ] member states in 1958, when the ] came into force. Since then, the EU's membership has grown to twenty-seven, with the latest member state being ], which joined in July 2013. The most recent ] was the incorporation of ] in 2014. ] joined the EU Customs Union in 2020. The most notable ], and its predecessors, have been the exit of ] upon independence in 1962, the ] in 1985, and the ] in 2020. | |||
---- | |||
] are currently ongoing with ] (since 2012), ] (since 2014), ] (since 2020), ] (since 2020), ] (since 2024), and ] (since 2024). ] were opened in October 2005,<ref name="TUR2006">{{cite web|url=https://ab.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_2006.pdf|title=Turkey 2006 Progress Report|publisher=European Commission|date=8 November 2006|access-date=15 July 2024}}</ref> but have been effectively frozen by the EU since December 2016,<ref name="Yahoo">{{cite news |url= https://www.yahoo.com/news/eu-says-wont-open-turkey-membership-chapters-165121377.html |title=EU says won't expand Turkey membership talks |website=yahoo.com |date=13 December 2016 |first=Danny |last=Kempf |agency=Agence France-Presse |access-date=21 November 2019 |archive-date=30 December 2019 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20191230224317/https://www.yahoo.com/news/eu-says-wont-open-turkey-membership-chapters-165121377.html|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="CouncilDecisions2018">{{Cite web|url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/35863/st10555-en18.pdf|title=Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association process - Council conclusions (10555/18)|website=Consilium|publisher=General Secretariat of the Council|date=26 June 2018|access-date=16 July 2024}}</ref><ref name="CouncilDecisions2023">{{Cite web|url=https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16707-2023-INIT/en/pdf|title=Council conclusions on Enlargement (16707/23)|website=Consilium|publisher=General Secretariat of the Council|date=12 December 2023|access-date=13 July 2024}}</ref> due to backsliding in the areas of democracy, rule of law, and fundamental rights.<ref name="Yahoo"/><ref name="AljazeeraSep2023">{{cite news |last1=Uras |first1=Umut |title=Is Turkey's bid for EU membership over? |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/20/analysis-is-turkeys-bid-for-eu-membership-over |access-date=21 October 2023 |publisher=Al Jazeera |date=20 Sep 2023}}</ref><ref name="TurkeyStatus">{{Cite web|url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/turkey/|title=Enlargement: Türkiye|website=Consilium|publisher=General Secretariat of the Council|date=11 January 2024|access-date=27 June 2024}}</ref> | |||
<div style="line-height:95%">1981:<br />]</div> | |||
] and ] were granted official candidate status respectively in December 2022<ref name="BIHcandidate">{{cite web |title='Huge, historic move': EU grants Bosnia and Herzegovina Candidate Status |url=https://sarajevotimes.com/huge-historic-move-eu-grants-bosnia-and-herzegovina-candidate-status/ |access-date=24 December 2022 |date=15 December 2022 |work=Sarajevo Times}}</ref><ref name="BIHstatus">{{Cite web|url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/bosnia-herzegovina/|title=Enlargement: Bosnia and Herzegovina|website=Consilium|publisher=General Secretariat of the Council|date=4 May 2024|access-date=27 June 2024}}</ref> and December 2023,<ref name="GEOstatus">{{Cite web|url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/georgia/|title=Enlargement: Georgia|website=Consilium|publisher=General Secretariat of the Council|date=7 February 2024|access-date=27 June 2024}}</ref> but were asked to complete additional reforms before qualifying for the formal start of membership negotiations. ] submitted an application for membership in December 2022.<ref name="KosovoApli">{{cite news|url= https://apnews.com/article/europe-kosovo-european-union-308669f8d15bc217ec047e5d9805b278 |work=Associated Press |title=Kosovo leaders sign application request to join EU |first1=Erion |last1=Xhabafti |first2=Llazar |last2=Semini |date=14 December 2022|access-date=14 December 2022}}</ref> For Kosovo to be granted official candidate status, the ] will need to unanimously agree to start Kosovo's accession process by requesting an opinion from the ] on its application. The EU however remains divided on its policy towards Kosovo, with five ] not ]. | |||
---- | |||
== Criteria == | |||
<div style="line-height:95%">1986:<br />]<br />]</div> | |||
{{further|Copenhagen criteria}} | |||
{{Politics of the European Union}} | |||
According to the ], membership of the European Union is open to "any European State which respects the values referred to in Article 2 and is committed to promoting them" (]). Those ] values are "respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities." This is based on the 1993 "]" agreed as it became clear many former ] countries would apply to join: | |||
---- | |||
{{cquote|Membership requires that candidate country has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the ], human rights, respect for and protection of ], the existence of a functioning ] as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union. Membership presupposes the candidate's ability to take on the obligations of membership including adherence to the aims of political, economic and ] union.|||Excerpt from the Copenhagen Presidency conclusions<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement/ec/pdf/cop_en.pdf |title=PRESIDENCY CONCLUSIONS : Copenhagen European Council – 21–22 June 1993 |publisher=European Parliament |access-date=2016-04-21}}</ref>}} | |||
<div style="line-height:95%">1995:<br />]<br />]<br />]</div> | |||
In December 1995, the Madrid European Council revised the membership criteria to include conditions for member country integration through the appropriate adjustment of its administrative structures: since it is important that European Community legislation be reflected in national legislation, it is critical that the revised national legislation be implemented effectively through appropriate administrative and judicial structures. | |||
---- | |||
Finally, and technically outside the Copenhagen criteria, comes the further requirement that all prospective members must enact legislation to bring their laws into line with the body of European law built up over the history of the Union, known as the '']''. | |||
<div style="line-height:95%">2004:<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]</div> | |||
== Process == | |||
---- | |||
], which plays a central role in the enlargement process.]] | |||
Today the accession process follows a series of formal steps, from a pre-accession agreement to the ratification of the final accession treaty. These steps are primarily presided over by the European Commission (] and ]), but the actual negotiations are technically conducted between the Union's Member States and the candidate country. | |||
Before a country applies for membership it typically signs an ] to help prepare the country for candidacy and eventual membership. Most countries do not meet the criteria to even begin negotiations before they apply, so they need many years to prepare for the process. An association agreement helps prepare for this first step. | |||
<div style="line-height:95%">2007:<br />]<br />]</div> | |||
In the case of the ], a special process, the ] exists to deal with the special circumstances there. | |||
When a country formally applies for membership, the Council asks the commission to prepare an opinion on the country's readiness to begin negotiations. The council can then either accept or reject the commission's opinion (The council has only once rejected the commission's opinion when the latter advised against opening negotiations with Greece).<ref> on CVCE.eu</ref> | |||
If the Council agrees to open negotiations the screening process then begins. The commission and candidate country examine its laws and those of the EU and determine what differences exist. The Council then recommends opening negotiations on "chapters" of law that it feels there is sufficient common ground to have constructive negotiations. Negotiations are typically a matter of the candidate country convincing the EU that its laws and administrative capacity are sufficient to execute European law, which can be implemented as seen fit by the member states. Often this will involve time-lines before the Acquis Communautaire (European regulations, ] and standards) has to be fully implemented. | |||
] | |||
A chapter is said to be closed when both sides have agreed it has been implemented sufficiently, however it can still be re-opened if the Commission feels that the candidate has fallen out of compliance. | |||
To assess progress achieved by countries in preparing for accession to the European Union, the ] submits regular reports (yearly) to the ]. These serve as a basis for the council to make decisions on negotiations or their extension to other candidates. | |||
Once the negotiations are complete, a ] will be signed, which must then be ratified by all of the member states of the Union, as well as the institutions of the Union, and the candidate country. Once this has been completed it will join the Union on the date specified in the treaty. | |||
The entire process, from application for membership to membership has typically taken about a decade, although some countries, notably Sweden, Finland, and Austria have been faster, taking only a few years. The process from application for association agreement through accession has taken far longer, as much as several decades (Turkey, for example, first applied for association in the 1950s and has yet to conclude accession negotiations). | |||
On 18 October 2019, France vetoed starting of negotiations with Albania and North Macedonia, citing problems with the current enlargement process.<ref>{{cite news |title=EU anger as France blocks move into Balkans |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50100201 |access-date=30 November 2019 |date=18 October 2019}}</ref> In November 2019, France proposed a seven-stage accession plan for membership.<ref>{{cite web |last1=MOMTAZ |first1=RYM |last2=BARIGAZZI |first2=JACOPO |last3=BAYER |first3=LILI |date=19 November 2019 |title=6 countries write to Juncker to support EU enlargement reform |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/6-countries-write-to-juncker-to-support-eu-enlargement-reform/ |access-date=8 March 2022 |website=Politico}}</ref> The reformed accession strategy proposes participation in different programs, such as Erasmus, Banking Union, Capital Markets Union, Customs Union, etc.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nov 2019 NP Enlargement EN |url=https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Enlargement-nonpaper.pdf |access-date=30 November 2019}}</ref> | |||
=== Example === | |||
The following is an example of the accession process—Estonia's path to membership from its ] from the ] in November 1991 with recognition from the EU the same month to ] in May 2004. Ease of accession depends on the state: how integrated it is with the EU beforehand, the state of its economy and public institutions, any outstanding political issues with the EU and (historically) how much law to date the EU has built up that the acceding state must adopt. This outline also includes integration steps taken by the accession country after it attains membership. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|+ Estonia EU membership timeline | |||
|- | |||
! Year | |||
! style="width:120px;"| Date | |||
! Event | |||
! Notes | |||
|- | |||
| 1991 | |||
| 20 August | |||
| Restoration of independence from ] | |||
| Recognition from EU in same month.<ref name="EE Over">{{cite web |url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/enlargement_process/past_enlargements/eu10/estonia_en.htm |title=European Commission – Enlargement: Archives Country Profiles |publisher=European Commission |access-date=2016-04-21 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110103111601/http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/enlargement_process/past_enlargements/eu10/estonia_en.htm |archive-date=3 January 2011}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
| 1994 | |||
| 18 July | |||
| ] concluded<ref name="EE Over" /> | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=3| 1995 | |||
| 1 January | |||
| Free trade agreement in force<ref name="EE Over" /> | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 12 June | |||
| ] concluded<ref name="EE Over" /> | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 24 November | |||
| '''Applied for Membership'''<ref name="EE Over" /> | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=2| 1998 | |||
| 1 January | |||
| Europe Agreement comes into force<ref name="EE Over" /> | |||
| Aiding pre-integration | |||
|- | |||
| March | |||
| Membership negotiations open<ref name="EE Over" /> | |||
| 6 chapters opened<ref name="Chapters 2004"> CVCE.eu</ref> | |||
|- | |||
| 1999 | |||
| | |||
| 17 chapters opened<ref name="Chapters 2004" /> | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 2000 | |||
| | |||
| 6 chapters opened<ref name="Chapters 2004" /> | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 2002 | |||
| December | |||
| All chapters closed<ref name="Chapters 2004" /> and negotiations concluded | |||
| Final chapter (No. 30) was opened and closed at the same time. | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=3| 2003 | |||
| 8 April | |||
| Draft accession treaty approved by Estonian government | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 16 April | |||
| ] signed | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 14 September | |||
| ] on membership approved | |||
| 66.84% in favour, turnout : 64.02% | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=2| 2004 | |||
| 1 May | |||
| '''Acceded to EU''' | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 28 June | |||
| Joined ] | |||
| Requires 2 years in ERM before ] adoption | |||
|- | |||
| 2007 | |||
| 21 December | |||
| Entered the ] | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=2| 2011 | |||
| 1 January | |||
| ] | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| 1 May | |||
| Right to limit migration from 2004 countries expired | |||
| Only Austria and Germany applied this, the rest of EU countries abolished restrictions before 2011 | |||
|} | |} | ||
<div style="float:right">]</div> | |||
{{Politics of the European Union mini}} | |||
'''Enlargement of the European Union''' has occurred six times since the Union's '']'' predecessor, the ], was established by six founding states in ]. Thus the number of ] has grown to twenty-seven. The largest enlargement occurred on ], ], when 10 new countries acceded the ] (EU). Most recently, ] and ] joined the bloc on ], ]. | |||
== Success and fatigue == | |||
Currently, accession negotiations are underway with several states. The process of enlargement is sometimes referred to as ]. However, this term is also used to refer to the intensification of cooperation between EU member states as national governments allow for the gradual centralising of power within European institutions. | |||
Enlargement has been one of the EU's successful foreign policies,<ref name="ISS">Piket, Vincent {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090903031927/http://www.iiss.org/programmes/russia-and-eurasia/copyof-russian-regional-perspectives-journal/rrp-volume-1-issue-3/eu-enlargement-and-and-neighbourhood-policy/ |date=3 September 2009 }}, Institute for Strategic Studies</ref> yet has equally suffered from considerable opposition from the start. French President ] opposed British membership.<ref name="Bache 1" /> A later French President, ], opposed Greek, Spanish and Portuguese membership, fearing that the former dictatorships were not ready and that the countries' inclusion would reduce the union to a free-trade area.<ref name="ESI">, European Security Initiative 2006</ref> | |||
The reasons for the first member states to apply, and for them to be accepted, were primarily economic while the second enlargement was more political. The southern Mediterranean countries had just emerged from dictatorships and wanted to secure their democratic systems through the EEC, while the EEC wanted to ensure the same thing and that their southern neighbours were stable and aligned to NATO.<ref name="Bache 1">{{cite book |last1=Bache |first1=Ian |first2=Stephen |last2=George |date=2006 |title=Politics in the European Union |publisher=Oxford University Press |edition=2nd |isbn=9780199276585 |pages=540–542}}</ref> These two principal forces, economic gain and political security, have been behind enlargements since. After the large enlargements in 2004, public opinion in Europe turned against further expansion.<ref name="ESI" /> | |||
In order to join the European Union, a state needs to fulfill the economic and political conditions generally known as the ] (after the ] summit in June 1993), which require a secular, democratic government, the rule of law, and its corresponding freedoms and institutions. According to the ], each current member state and also the ] have to agree to any enlargement. | |||
It has also been acknowledged that enlargement has its limits; the EU cannot expand endlessly.<ref name="ISS" /> Former Commission President ] favoured granting "everything but institutions" to the EU's neighbour states, allowing them to co-operate deeply while not adding strain on the EU's institutional framework.<ref name="ISS" /> This has in particular been pushed by France and Germany as a ] for Turkey, membership for which has faced considerable opposition on cultural and logistical grounds.<ref>Kardas, Saban (13 May 2009) , Jamestown Foundation</ref><ref>Schauble, Wolfgang (2004) , ]</ref> | |||
The present EU Treaty - the ] - does not provide for the voting arrangements to be adopted for more than the present 27 members. Although the proposed ] did provide such a mechanism, it was abandoned after referenda in two countries prevented its ratification. The newly signed ] provides this mechanism, but has yet to be ratified. | |||
== Historical enlargements == | |||
Enlargement may lead to negative commercial consequences for other ] Member States. The EU and the US have agreed in March 2006 to provide compensation for negative consequences associated with the 2004 enlargement.<ref></ref> | |||
{{See also|History of the European Union|Statistics relating to enlargement of the European Union}} | |||
{{sticky header}}{{table alignment}} | |||
==Historical enlargements== | |||
{| class="sortable wikitable sticky-header col1left" {{right}} | |||
{{main|History of the European Union}} | |||
|+ Applications for accession to the EU, ] or ] | |||
===Founding members=== | |||
! Applicant | |||
The ] (ECSC) was proposed by ] in ] on ] ] and involved the pooling the ] and ] industries of ] and ]. Joining this project were the ] countries of ], ] and the ] who already achieved a degree of integration between themselves. These countries were joined by ] and they all signed the ] on ] ]. These six countries, dubbed the ']' (as opposed to the 'outer seven' who formed the ] who suspicious of such plans for integration) went on to sign the ] establishing two further communities, together known as the ] when they merged their executives in 1967. | |||
! Submitted | |||
! Accession /<br/>failure rationale | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Albania}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2009-04-28}} | |||
| style="background:#33D438" | <span style="display:none">A</span><ref name="July2022AlMk">{{cite web |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-launch-accession-talks-north-macedonia-albania/ |title=EU launches accession talks with North Macedonia, Albania |date=19 July 2022 |accessdate=2022-07-19 |website=Politico Europe}}</ref>''Negotiating'' | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Austria}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1989-07-17}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1995-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Belgium}} ] | |||
| <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}}</span>Founder | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Bosnia and Herzegovina}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2016-02-15}} | |||
| style="background:#D6FF4E" | <span style="display:none">B</span><ref name="md-uk-candidacy">{{Cite news |title=MEPs: Open accession talks with Ukraine, Moldova and Bosnia and Herzegovina |url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231208IPR15784/meps-open-accession-talks-with-ukraine-moldova-and-bosnia-and-herzegovina |date=13 December 2023 |work=Politico}}</ref> ''Candidate'' | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Bulgaria}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1995-12-14}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2007-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Croatia}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2003-02-21}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2013-07-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Cyprus}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1990-07-03}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Czech Republic}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1996-01-17}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2 | {{flagicon|Denmark}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1961-08-10}} | |||
| style="background:#B39FFF" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1963}}</span>{{efn-ua|text=Due to veto of UK application.}}Withdrawn | |||
|- | |||
| {{right}} {{dts|format=dmy|1967-05-11}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1973-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Estonia}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1995-11-24}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Finland}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1992-03-18}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1995-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|France}} ] | |||
| <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}}</span>Founder | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Georgia (country)}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2022-03-03}} | |||
| style="background:#D6FF4E" | <span style="display:none">B</span><ref name="ge-candidacy">{{cite news|url=https://civil.ge/archives/477258|title=Georgia's PM Signs Application to Join the EU|author=Civil.ge| publisher=Civil.ge| date=3 March 2022| access-date=3 March 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://agenda.ge/en/news/2023/4908#gsc.tab=0|title=European Council grants EU candidate status to Georgia - Council President|publisher=Agenda.ge| date=14 December 2023| access-date=3 March 2024}}</ref>''Candidate'' | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|West Germany}} ]{{efn-ua|text=On 3 October 1990, ] joined ] through the process of ]; since then, the reunited Germany has been a single member state.}} | |||
| <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}}</span>Founder | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Greece}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1975-06-12}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1981-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Hungary}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1994-03-31}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Iceland}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2009-07-17}} | |||
| style="background:#B39FFF" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|2013-09-13}}</span>{{efn-ua|text=Due to the ].}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dw.de/iceland-withdraws-eu-accession-bid/a-18313183|title=Iceland withdraws EU accession bid|date=12 March 2015|access-date=2015-03-12|publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | author=Iceland's Ministry of Foreign Affairs | title=Minister Sveinsson meets with Stefan Füle | date=13 June 2013 | url=http://eu.mfa.is/other/news/nr/7711 | access-date=2013-06-19 | archive-date=3 April 2015 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150403155321/http://eu.mfa.is/other/news/nr/7711 | url-status=dead }}</ref> Withdrawn | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2 | {{flagicon|Ireland}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1961-07-31}} | |||
| style="background:#B39FFF" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1963}}</span>{{efn-ua|text=Due to veto of UK application.}}Withdrawn | |||
|- | |||
| {{right}} {{dts|format=dmy|1967-05-11}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1973-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Italy}} ] | |||
| <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}}</span>Founder | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Kosovo}} ]<ref name="European Commission">{{cite news |url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/instruments/funding-by-country/kosovo/index_en.htm |work=European Commission |title=European Commission- Enlargement- Kosovo* |date=28 June 2013 |access-date=28 June 2013}}</ref> | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2022-12-14}} | |||
| style="background:#ffd617" | <span style="display:none">C</span><ref name="Enlargement">{{cite web|url=https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/countries/check-current-status_en|title=Check current status|last=Anonymous|date=6 December 2016|website=European Neighbourhood Policy And Enlargement Negotiations – European Commission|access-date=7 May 2019}}</ref>''Applicant'' | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Latvia}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1995-09-13}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Lithuania}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1995-12-08}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Luxembourg}} ] | |||
| <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}}</span>Founder | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}} | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2 | {{flagicon|Malta}} ] | |||
| rowspan=2 | {{dts|format=dmy|1990-07-16}} | |||
| style="background:#FF9459" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1996-10}}</span>{{efn-ua|text=Due to ] in October 1996. Resumed following another ] in September 1998.}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ec.europa.eu/malta/abc/malta_eu/chronology/index_en.htm |title=Chronology |publisher=] |access-date=2014-03-09}}</ref> Frozen | |||
|- | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white; text-align:right" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Moldova}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2022-03-03}} | |||
| style="background:#33D438" | <span style="display:none">A</span><ref name="June2024UkrMol">{{cite web |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_24_3461/ |title=Statement by President von der Leyen on opening accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova |date=25 July 2024 |accessdate=2024-06-25 |website=European Commission}}</ref>''Negotiating'' | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Montenegro}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2008-12-15}} | |||
| style="background:#33D438" | <span style="display:none">A</span><ref name="Enlargement" />''Negotiating'' | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Morocco}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1987-07-20}} | |||
| style="background:#FF8FF2" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1987-07-20}}</span>{{efn-ua|name=NEC|text=By the European Council.}}<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=1636915&C=europe |title=EU Mulls Deeper Policy Cooperation with Morocco |publisher=Defense News |date=22 March 2006 |access-date=2006-07-04}}{{dead link|date=January 2022 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> Rejected | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Netherlands}} ] | |||
| <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}}</span>Founder | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1952-07-23}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|North Macedonia}} ]{{efn-ua|text=Referred to as "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" by the EU before 2019.}} | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2004-03-22}} | |||
| style="background:#33D438" | <span style="display:none">A</span><ref name="July2022AlMk" />''Negotiating'' | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=3 | {{flagicon|Norway}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1962-04-30}} | |||
| style="background:#B39FFF" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1963}}</span>{{efn-ua|text=Due to veto of UK application.}}Withdrawn | |||
|- | |||
| {{right}} {{dts|format=dmy|1967-07-21}} | |||
| style="background:#B39FFF" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1972}}</span>{{efn-ua|text=By Norway after a ].}}<ref>{{cite web |author=European Commission |title=1972 |date=10 November 2005 |work=The History of the European Union |url=http://europa.eu/abc/history/1972/index_en.htm |access-date=2006-01-18 |archive-date=14 June 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060614174855/http://europa.eu/abc/history/1972/index_en.htm}}</ref> Withdrawn | |||
|- | |||
| {{right}} {{dts|format=dmy|1992-11-25}} | |||
| style="background:#B39FFF" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1994}}</span>{{efn-ua|text=By Norway after a ].}}<ref>{{cite web |author=European Commission |title=1994 |date=10 November 2005 |work=The History of the European Union |url=http://europa.eu/abc/history/1994/index_en.htm |access-date=2006-01-18 |archive-date=14 June 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060614175424/http://europa.eu/abc/history/1994/index_en.htm}}</ref> Withdrawn | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Poland}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1994-04-05}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Portugal}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1977-03-28}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1986-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Romania}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1995-06-22}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2007-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Serbia}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2009-12-22}} | |||
| style="background:#33D438" | <span style="display:none">A</span><ref name="Enlargement" />''Negotiating'' | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Slovakia}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1995-06-27}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Slovenia}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1996-06-10}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|2004-05-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2 | {{flagicon|Spain}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1962-02-09}} | |||
| style="background:#FF8FF2" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1964}}</span>{{efn-ua|name=NEC}}<ref name=ARTEHISTORIA>{{cite web |url=http://www.artehistoria.jcyl.es/v2/contextos/7439.htm |title=La ofensiva europea |trans-title=The European Offensive |language=es |work=ARTEHISTORIA |publisher=Junta de Castilla y León |access-date=2 August 2013 |archive-date=11 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140111020543/http://www.artehistoria.jcyl.es/v2/contextos/7439.htm}}</ref> Rejected | |||
|- | |||
| {{right}} {{dts|format=dmy|1977-06-28}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1986-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Sweden}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1991-07-01}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1995-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Switzerland}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1992-05-25}} | |||
| style="background:#B39FFF" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|2016}}</span>{{efn-ua|text=Due to public opinion.}}<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/eu-membership-application-not-to-be-withdrawn/4811170 |title=EU membership application not to be withdrawn |date=26 October 2005 |access-date=2015-03-12 |publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |website=British Embassy, Bern |title=EU and Switzerland |date=4 July 2006 |url=http://www.britishembassy.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket%2FXcelerate%2FShowPage&c=Page&cid=1085326325096 |access-date=2006-07-04 |archive-date=28 April 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060428003205/http://www.britishembassy.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket%2FXcelerate%2FShowPage&c=Page&cid=1085326325096}}</ref><ref name=Reimann>{{cite web |author=Reimann Lukas |date=2014-03-21 |trans-title=Withdraw the EU membership application and tell it like it is |language=fr |work=] |url=https://www.parlament.ch/en/ratsbetrieb/suche-curia-vista/geschaeft?AffairId=20143219 |access-date=15 June 2016 |title=Retirer la demande d'adhésion à l'UE et dire les choses telles qu'elles sont}}</ref><ref name="Swiss Federal Council">{{cite web |trans-title=Withdrawal of Switzerland's application for membership of the EU |date=27 July 2016 |url=https://www.eda.admin.ch/content/dam/dea/fr/documents/bundesrat/160727-Lettre-retrait-adhesion-CH_fr.pdf |access-date=2016-09-13 |publisher=] |title=Retrait de la demande d'adhesion de la Suisse a l'UE |language=fr |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161022054616/https://www.eda.admin.ch/content/dam/dea/fr/documents/bundesrat/160727-Lettre-retrait-adhesion-CH_fr.pdf |archive-date=2016-10-22}}</ref> Withdrawn | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Turkey}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1987-04-14}} | |||
| style="background:#FF6C09" | <span style="display:none">E</span><ref>{{cite news |date=21 February 2019 |title=Turkey condemns European parliament committee call to suspend... |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-turkey-eu-idUSKCN1QA0MJ |access-date=21 February 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Turkey Faces Crucial Vote on EU Accession Before Local Ballot |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2019-02-21/turkey-faces-crucial-vote-on-eu-accession-before-local-ballot |access-date=21 February 2019 |website=bloomberg.com}}</ref><ref name="Enlargement" />''Frozen negotiations'' | |||
|- | |||
| {{flagicon|Ukraine}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|2022-02-28}} | |||
| style="background:#33D438" | <span style="display:none">A</span><ref name="June2024UkrMol" />''Negotiating'' | |||
|- | |||
| rowspan=2 | {{flagicon|United Kingdom}} ] | |||
| {{dts|format=dmy|1961-08-10}} | |||
| style="background:#e8d911" | <span style="display:none">{{dts|format=dmy|1963}}</span>{{efn-ua|text=By France.}}Vetoed | |||
|- | |||
| {{right}} {{dts|format=dmy|1967-05-10}} | |||
| style="background:#003399; color:white" | {{dts|format=dmy|1973-01-01}} | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
'''Notes:''' | |||
{{notelist-ua}} | |||
{{clear|left}} | |||
=== Membership of EU predecessors === | |||
] | |||
The ] (ECSC) was proposed by ] in ] on ] and involved the pooling of the coal and steel industries of France and ].<ref>{{cite web|author=European Commission |title=The Schuman Declaration – 9 May 1950 |date=12 January 2015 |url=http://europa.eu/about-eu/basic-information/symbols/europe-day/schuman-declaration/index_en.htm |access-date=2016-03-11}}</ref> Half of the project states, ], ], and the ], had already achieved a great degree of integration amongst themselves with the organs of ] and earlier bilateral agreements. These five countries were joined by Italy and they all signed the ] on 23 July 1952. These six members, dubbed the ']' (as opposed to the ']' who formed the ] who were suspicious of such plans for integration) went on to sign the ] establishing two further communities, together known as the ] when they merged their executives in 1967.<ref name="janse18">{{cite journal |doi=10.1111/eulj.12253 |title=The evolution of the political criteria for accession to the European Community, 1957–1973 |last1=Janse |first1=Ronald |year=2018 |journal=European Law Journal|volume=24 |pages=57–76 |doi-access=free|hdl=11245.1/6fc097fd-ebbf-4d72-9b2a-70c8a6df1116|hdl-access=free}}</ref> | |||
The Community did see some loss of territory due to the ] occurring in their era; ], which was an integral part of France and hence the Community, gained independence on ] ] and hence left the Community. There was no enlargement until the 1970s. The ], which previously refused to join, changed its policy following the ] and applied to be a member of the Communities. However, ] ] vetoed Britain's membership fearing its ] influence. Due to this, other members of EFTA suspended their applications which had been put forward with Britain's. | |||
In 1962, Spain, ruled by the ] ], issued its first attempt to join the ]. Spanish Foreign Affairs minister ] sent the request form to French Prime Minister ].<ref name=ARTEHISTORIA/> This request was rejected by all the member countries in 1964; ] at the time, and thus unable to enter the EEC.<ref>{{cite thesis |author=Heidy Cristina Senante Berendes |date=2002 |title=España ante la integración europea (1962-1967): el largo proceso para la apertura de negociaciones |trans-title=Spain before European integration (1962-1967): the long process for opening negotiations |page=456 |publisher=University of Alicante |url=http://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/10114/1/Senante%20Berendes,%20Heidy%20Cristina.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150403124501/http://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/10114/1/Senante%20Berendes,%20Heidy%20Cristina.pdf |archive-date=3 April 2015 |language=es}}</ref> | |||
===First enlargements=== | |||
Once de Gaulle had left office, the door to enlargement was once again opened. Together with the ], ], ] and ] applied and were accepted; however the Norwegian government lost a national referendum on membership and hence did not accede with the others on ] ]. ], a ], joined the Community with the United Kingdom. | |||
The Community did see some loss of territory due to the ] occurring in their era. ], which was an integral part of France, had a special relationship with the Community.<ref>]</ref> Algeria gained independence on 5 July 1962 and hence left the Community. There would be no further efforts at enlargement until the early 1970s. | |||
The 1970s also saw the restoration of democracy in ], ] and ]. Greece joined in 1981 and the two ] countries in 1986. 1985 however saw the only time a country had voted to leave the Community, when ] was granted ] by Denmark and the territory used its new powers and voted to withdraw from the Community (See ]). | |||
=== Enlargement of the European Communities === | |||
===Post-Cold War=== | |||
In 1989/1990 the ] came to an end, on ] ] ] and West Germany ], hence East Germany became part of the Community in the new reunified ] (not increasing the number of states). The Community later became the European Union in 1993 by virtue of the ]. In part due to the end of Cold War tensions, the EFTA states bordering the old ] applied to join the Community. On ] ] ], ] and ] acceded to the EU marking its fourth enlargement. The Norwegian government lost a second national referendum on membership. | |||
{{Main|1973 enlargement of the European Communities}} | |||
]'s fall enabled eastward enlargement. (])]] | |||
<imagemap> | |||
File:Evolution of the European Union SMIL.svg|thumb|Interactive map of the enlargement and evolution of the European Union, excluding Greenland and Algeria | |||
default | |||
</imagemap> | |||
The United Kingdom, which had refused to join as a founding member, changed its policy following the ] and applied to be a member of the Communities. Other EEC members were also inclined to British membership on those grounds. ] ] vetoed British membership.<ref name="Bache 1" /> | |||
Once de Gaulle had left office, the door to enlargement was once again opened. The EEC economy had also slowed down and British membership was seen as a way to revitalise the community.<ref name="Bache 1" /> Only after a 12-hour talk between British Prime Minister ] and French President ] took place did Britain's third application succeed.<ref name="upi.com"> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090212064553/http://www.upi.com/Audio/Year_in_Review/Events-of-1971/12295509436546-1/#title |date=12 February 2009 }}, UPI.com"</ref> After Britain was accepted Prime Minister Edward Heath said: | |||
The end of the Cold War and westernisation of Eastern Europe led to the EU wanting to establish standards for new entrants so their suitability could be judged. These ] stated that a country must be a ], operate a ] and be willing to adopt the entire body of ] already agreed upon. | |||
{{blockquote|For my part, I have no doubt at all that the discussions which we have had will prove of real and lasting benefit, not only to Britain and France, but to Europe as a whole.<ref name="upi.com" />}} | |||
===Eastern bloc enlargements=== | |||
8 of these countries (], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]), plus the ] islands of ] and ], joined on ] ]. This was the largest single enlargement in terms of people and landmass, though the smallest in terms of GDP. The less developed nature of these countries were of concern to some of the older member states, who placed temporary restrictions on the travel and rights of work of eastern citizens to their countries. The migration that occurred in any case spawned clichés in some western countries (such as the "]"), despite acknowledging their benefit to the economies concerned. | |||
As part of the deal for British entry, France agreed to allow the EEC its own monetary resources. However France made that concession only as Britain's small agriculture sector would ensure that Britain would be a net contributor to the ] dominated ].<ref name="Bache 1" /> Applying together with the UK, as on the previous occasions, were ], Ireland, and ].<ref>For more on Ireland's attempts at membership see Michael J. Geary, ''An Inconvenient Wait: Ireland's Quest for Membership of the EEC, 1957–73'' (Institute of Public Administration, 2009) ({{ISBN|9781904541837}})</ref> These countries were so economically linked to the UK that they considered it necessary to join the EEC if the UK did.<ref name="Bache 1" /> However the Norwegian government ] and hence did not accede with the others on 1 January 1973. ] joined the Community with the United Kingdom at this point, as can be seen in the long title of the ]. | |||
The sixth enlargement<ref name="fifthwave">According to the , the signature of the Accession Treaty of Romania and Bulgaria ''"marks the completion of the fifth enlargement of the EU"''. Consequently, the enlargement in 2004 was only the first part of the ''Fifth Enlargement''. Also, recently Elmar Brok, a German member of the European Parliament and the chairman of the EP Committee on Foreign Affairs, added "We do not think that Croatia is a part of the future wave of the (European Union) enlargement. Croatia is the last part of the ongoing process of the enlargement according to the formula 10 plus two plus one." </ref> to ] (see ]) and ] (see ]), who were not ready to join in 2004, took place on ] ]. They, like the 2004 countries, faced some restrictions. The lack of progress in some areas such as the judiciary led to further restrictions, such as EU funds they would normally receive, until they fully complied. | |||
== |
=== Mediterranean enlargements === | ||
] | |||
In 1989, the European Community's ] program was created. It aimed to provide financial support for potential ] so that they could expand and reform their economies. To join the EU an applicant country must meet the following ] established by the European Council in 1993: | |||
*Stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities. | |||
*The existence of a functioning market economy as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union. | |||
*The ability to take on the obligations of membership including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union. | |||
{{Further|1981 enlargement of the European Communities|1986 enlargement of the European Communities|Accession Treaty of Spain to the European Economic Community}} | |||
In December ], the Madrid European Council revised the membership criteria to include conditions for member country integration through the appropriate adjustment of its administrative structures: since it is important that European Community legislation be reflected in national legislation, it is critical that the revised national legislation be implemented effectively through appropriate administrative and judicial structures. | |||
The next enlargement would occur for different reasons. The 1970s also saw ], ], and ] emerge from dictatorship. These countries desired to consolidate their new democratic systems by binding themselves into the EEC. Equally, the EEC was unsure about which way these countries were heading and wanted to ensure stability along its southern borders.<ref name="Bache 1" /> However ] initially opposed their membership fearing they were not ready and it would water the community down to a free trade area.<ref name="ESI" /> | |||
In order to assess progress achieved by countries in preparing for accession to the European Union, the ] submits 'Regular Reports' to the ]. These serve as the basis upon which the Council takes decisions on negotiations or their extension to other candidates. Since 1993, the Commission has presented a complete set of Regular Reports on a yearly basis, covering the 10 now member countries in Central and Eastern Europe (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia) as well as Cyprus, Malta and Turkey. | |||
Greece joined the EEC in 1981 followed by Spain and Portugal in 1986. None of these nations had a ]. | |||
==Future enlargement== | |||
{{main|Future enlargement of the European Union}} | |||
[[Image:European Union member states with applications.svg|thumb|right|300px|<!--{{legend|#2c5f2c|current members}}--> | |||
{{legend|#A0E200|current members}} | |||
<!--{{legend|#005382|acceding countries}}--> | |||
{{legend|#006BA8|candidate countries}} | |||
{{legend|#00AAE2|potential candidate countries}} | |||
{{legend|#E2DF00|application frozen as negotiations rejected in a referendum}} | |||
{{legend|#C22929|application rejected by the ]}} | |||
{{legend|#FFBDBD|accession rejected in two referenda <small>(] and ])</small>}} | |||
]] | |||
In the ] (Article 49), it is stated that any European country that respects the principles of the European Union may apply to join. The Copenhagen European Council set out the conditions for EU membership in June 1993 in the so-called ]. Whether a country is European or not is a subject to ] by the EU institutions, but countries in the ] that fall onto the border between ] and ] all have a significant claim for EU membership, as shown with the accession of ], but culturally European, ]. | |||
The year 1985, however, saw the first time a territory voted to ], when ] was granted ] by Denmark and the territory used its new powers and voted to withdraw from the Community (see ]). | |||
At present, a country must first sign a ] (SSA) with the EU before applying for membership, which, if successful, will result in the state being awarded the status of an official candidate. Negotiations then take place where it adopts EU norms which, once fully taken on board, will result in accession. The Western Balkan states are currently adopting SSA agreements with Croatia and Macedonia joining Turkey in achieving candidate status. | |||
] and ] applied for membership in 1987. Morocco's application was turned down as it was not considered European;{{citation needed|date=August 2023}} Turkey's application was considered eligible on the basis of the 1963 ] but the opinion of the Commission on the possible candidate status was by then negative.{{citation needed|date=August 2023}} Turkey received candidate status in 1999 and ] in 2005, which were still in progress as of 2021.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.abgs.gov.tr/index.php?p=65&l=2 |title=Turkey Secretariat General for EU affairs – Current situation in accession negotiations|website=Abgs.gov.tr|access-date=2016-04-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110616021143/http://www.abgs.gov.tr/index.php?p=65&l=2|archive-date=16 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
However, under the current ], the EU cannot have more than 27 members. Unless this is changed (which the ] was to do but is currently in abeyance), the European Union is unable to offer membership to any new candidates. | |||
=== |
=== Post–Cold War === | ||
====Croatia==== | |||
{{Main|Accession of Croatia to the European Union}} | |||
] | |||
] applied for EU membership in 2003, and the ] recommended making it an official candidate in early 2004. Candidate country status was granted to Croatia by the ] (the EU's heads of government) in mid-2004 and a date for the beginning of entry negotiations, while originally set for early 2005, was postponed to October of the same year. Following the opening of accession negotiations on ] ], the process of screening 33 acquis chapters with Croatia was completed on ] ]. | |||
{{Main|1995 enlargement of the European Union}} | |||
After ], Croatia has recovered best from the break-up of the former Yugoslavia and so hopes to become the second former Yugoslav state to become a member. It has a stable market economy, and has had better statistical indicators than Bulgaria and Romania which joined in 2007. | |||
]'s fall enabled eastward enlargement. (])]] | |||
After the 1970s, Europe experienced an economic downturn which led to leaders launching of the ] which set to create a single market by 1992. The effect of this was that ] states found it harder to export to the EEC and businesses (including large EFTA corporations such as ]) wished to relocate within the new single market making the downturn worse for EFTA. EFTA states began to discuss closer links with the EEC despite its domestic unpopularity.<ref name="Bache 2">{{cite book |last1=Bache |first1=Ian |first2=Stephen |last2=George |date=2006 |title=Politics in the European Union |publisher=Oxford University Press |edition=2nd |isbn=9780199276585 |pages=543–547}}</ref> | |||
In late 2005, the EU officials projected that the accession of Croatia would likely happen between 2010 and 2012. In October 2006, Enlargement Commissioner ] stated: ''"If Croatia will be able to reform its judiciary and economy with rigour and resolution, then it is likely to be ready around the end of this decade."''<ref>, ''EUROPA - Rapid - Press Releases'', 31 October 2006</ref> | |||
], ], and Sweden were neutral in the ] so membership of an organisation developing a ] would be incompatible with that. With the end of the Cold War in 1989, that obstacle was removed, and the desire to pursue membership grew stronger.<ref name="Bache 2" /> On 3 October 1990, the ] brought East Germany into the Community without increasing the number of member states. | |||
The finalisation of all chapters of the '']'' is expected in September 2009, while signing the accession treaty would happen in the year after. Before starting negotiations with Croatia, the ''acquis'' was divided into 35 chapters, 4 more than the usual 31; the new chapters, previously part of the agricultural policy, are areas expected to be troublesome, as they were with the other applicants. Croatia was expected to be a full EU member by 2010<ref></ref>, though this presupposed ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon. | |||
The Community later became the European Union in 1993 by virtue of the ], and established standards for new entrants so their suitability could be judged. The ] stated in 1993 that a country must be a democracy, operate a ], and be willing to adopt the entire body of ] already agreed upon. Also in 1993 the ] was established with the EFTA states except ]. Most of the new EEA states pursued full EU membership as the EEA did not sufficiently satisfy the needs of their export based corporations. The EU has also preferred these states to integrate via the EEA rather than full membership as the EEC wished to pursue ] and did not wish for another round of enlargement to occupy their attention. However, with the EEA's credibility dented following rejection by businesses and Switzerland, the EU agreed with full membership. This was more readily accepted with the prospect of poorer countries wishing to join; contributions from richer countries would help balance the EU budget.<ref name="Bache 2" /> On 1 January 1995 ], ], and Sweden acceded to the EU marking its fourth enlargement. The Norwegian government lost a second national referendum on membership. | |||
====Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia==== | |||
{{Main|Accession of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to the European Union}} | |||
] | |||
The ] applied to become an official candidate on ], ]. On ], ] the European Commission recommended that it become a candidate state. EU leaders agreed to this recommendation on ], formally naming the country as an official candidate, but no date for starting negotiations has been announced yet. | |||
=== Eastern enlargement === | |||
The country has a dispute with its southern neighbour and current EU member, ], over the name ''Macedonia'' (see: ]). Because of this, the EU recognises the country as '''the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia''' and this is the only denotation by which the country may hold negotiations with the EU. Resolution of this issue is technically not a precondition for membership,<ref>{{PDFlink|}}</ref> but Greece and Cyprus have stated that they will veto the country's accession unless an agreement on the naming issue is reached.{{Fact|date=March 2008}} | |||
{{Further|2004 enlargement of the European Union|2007 enlargement of the European Union}} | |||
Peace is maintained with underlying ethnic tensions over Albanians in the west that achieved greater autonomy through the implementation of the ]. Unlike Serbia, it has maintained sovereignty over all its territory. Prime Minister ] has suggested that the country could join in 2012 or ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://derstandard.at/?id=2650785|title=Mazedoniens Premier Gruevski im Interview: "Beitrittsverhandlungen ab 2008"|publisher=]|date=2006-11-07|accessdate=2006-11-07}}</ref> However, the EU has not come out with any official recognition of this suggested time period. | |||
[[File:EU2004-2013.svg|thumb|upright=1.35|EU enlargements, 2004–2013:{{legend|#009900|EU prior to 2004}} | |||
{{legend|#33CC33|Joined the EU on 1 May 2004}} | |||
{{legend|#66FF66|Joined the EU on 1 January 2007}} | |||
{{legend|#B9FF83|Joined the EU on 1 July 2013}}]] | |||
In the late 1980s (shortly prior to the ]) ] announced the Soviet Union would no longer intervene in other countries' internal affairs (]), practically freeing ] from Soviet occupation (Czechoslovakia and Hungary) / Soviet backed authoritarian regimes. These countries wanted to consolidate their democracies through joining Western world international organisations (including participation in ]) which would ensure the newly emerged democracies would not fall back under Russian control. The EU and NATO offered a guarantee of this, and the EU was also seen as vital to ensuring the economic success of those countries. However, the EU's desire to accept these countries' membership applications was less than rapid. The collapse of communism came quickly and was not anticipated. The EU struggled to deal with the sudden reunification of Germany with the addition of its poorer 17 million people and, while keeping its monetary union project on track, it was still at that early stage pointing the EFTA countries in the direction of the EEA rather than full membership.<ref name="Bache 3">{{cite book |last1=Bache |first1=Ian |first2=Stephen |last2=George |date=2006 |title=Politics in the European Union |publisher=Oxford University Press |edition=2nd |isbn=9780199276585 |pages=549–550}}</ref> | |||
On ], ] the ] welcomed and congratulated the country's achievements in implementing multiple reforms and agreements (], ], ]). It supports the continuation of this process. | |||
Further concrete steps in the country's EU membership (i.e. commencing of negotiations) will be possible after the debate on the general Enlargement policy of the EU. The Council notes also that the absorption capacity of the EU will be taken into account.<ref>Presidency Conclusions – Brussels, 15/16 December 2005, 15914/05 7, EN: </ref> | |||
States in Central and Eastern Europe persisted and eventually the above-mentioned issues were cleared. The US also pressured the EU to offer membership as a temporary guarantee; it feared expanding NATO too rapidly for fear of frightening Russia. Although eventually trying to limit the number of members, and after encouragement from the US, the EU pursued talks with ten countries and a change of mind{{clarify|date=March 2014}} by ] and ] helped to offset slightly the influx of large poorer member states from Central and Eastern Europe.<ref name="Bache 3" /> | |||
In 2008, Athens said it will block Macedonia's NATO and European Union accession until the two agree on a name for Greece's northern neighbour, which broke away from Yugoslavia in 1991. Greece rejects the name Macedonia because it says it implies territorial ambitions towards Greece's own northern province of Macedonia, birthplace of Alexander the Great. ], the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Greece, accused Macedonia of "an intransigent stance and its action of an irredentist and nationalistic logic". "I underlined that the intransigence that has persisted to date ... has left us with no other choice," she said. "We are not happy about that. Nobody likes vetoes."<ref></ref> Following irregularities in the country's parliamentary elections in June 2008, there are fears among the international community and Greece that the Macedonian side will unilaterally withdraw from negotiations unless Greece concedes group to FYR Macedonia on the issue.{{Fact|date=June 2008}} | |||
{{table alignment}} | |||
====Turkey==== | |||
{| class="sortable wikitable col1left" {{right}} | |||
{{Main|Accession of Turkey to the European Union}} | |||
|- | |||
] | |||
|+The 10 post-Communist European Union candidate countries in 1998 | |||
|- | |||
! Country | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
Europe Association Agreement<br>signing date<br/><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=J8CGNnVESFQC&pg=PA12|title=Progress Toward the Unification of Europe|first=Helena|last=Tang|date=1 January 2000|publisher=World Bank Publications|page=12|isbn=9780821348031 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
Start of accession negotiations<br/><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gQobDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA54 |title=A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed|first1=M. Steven|last1=Fish|first2=Graeme|last2=Gill|first3=Milenko |last3=Petrovic|date=9 February 2017 |publisher=Springer|page=54 |isbn=9783319434377 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
Population in 1998<br/><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NbRKlzfeUE8C&pg=PA157 |title=Europe Unites: The EU's Eastern Enlargement|first=Peter A.|last=Poole|date=7 March 2003|publisher=Greenwood |page=157 |isbn=9780275977047 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
1998 GDP ($ billions)<br/>{{efn-ua|1998 GDP per capita multiplied by 1998 population<ref name="auto2">{{Cite web |url=https://www.ebrd.com/publications/transition-report-archive|title=transition report archive|publisher=European Bank for Reconstruction and Development|pages=113, 121, 125, 137, 149, 153, 161, 165, 177, 181}}</ref>}} | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
1998 GDP (PPP) per capita<br/><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qcd6q9OGjywC&pg=PA68 |title=World Economic Outlook, October 1999: Safeguarding Macroeconomci Stability at Low Inflation|date=1 October 1999 |publisher=International Monetary Fund|page=68 |isbn=9781557758392 |via=Google Books}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3MCxbsFFqn8C&pg=PA30 |title=Labor, Employment, and Social Policies in the EU Enlargement Process: Changing Perspectives and Policy Options |first1=Lodovico |last1=Pizzati |first2=Bernard |last2=Funck |date=7 March 2002 |publisher=World Bank Publications |page=30 |isbn=9780821350089 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
Real GDP in 1998<br>(1989=100)<br/>{{efn-ua|the average between the ] estimate (used by the ])<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=U57WAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA34|title=OECD Review of Agricultural Policies: Romania 2000|date=29 September 2000|publisher=OECD Publishing|page=34|isbn=9789264187825 |via=Google Books}}</ref> and the ] estimate (used by the ])<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UovuEJUzeIIC&pg=PA29|title=Demographic Consequences of Economic Transition in Countries of Central and Eastern Europe|first1=Dimitŭr|last1=Filipov|first2=Jürgen|last2=Dorbritz|date=1 January 2003 |publisher=Council of Europe|page=29|isbn=9789287151728 |via=Google Books}}</ref>}} | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
Real wage in 1998<br>(1989=100)<br/><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FO0GDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA138 |title=Global Trends in Eastern Europe |first=Nikolai |last=Genov |date=22 April 2016 |publisher=Routledge |page=138 |isbn=9781317127246 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
Real gross industrial output<br>in 1998 (1989=100)<br/><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/ctied9/trd_05_11e.pdf |author1=United Nations Economic and Social Council |author2=Economic Commission for Europe |author3=Committee for Trade, Industry and Enterprise Development |date=3 May 2005 |title=Evolution of the Industrial Sector in Transition Economies: A Statistical Overview |page=11}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
Private sector share of GDP in 1998<br/><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IwZREAAAQBAJ&pg=PA50 |title=Enlarging the Euro Area: External Empowerment and Domestic Transformation in East Central Europe |first=Kenneth |last=Dyson |date=2 November 2006 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=50 |isbn=978-0-19-151542-2 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
Asset share of state-owned banks in 1998<br/><ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tIhdDxTBwHMC&pg=PA13 |title=From Transition to Accession: Developing Stable and Competitive Financial Markets in Bulgaria |first1=Esen |last1=Ulgenerk |first2=Leila |last2=Zlaoui |date=1 January 2000 |publisher=World Bank Publications |page=13 |isbn=9780821347812 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
External debt in 1998<br>(% of GDP)<br/><ref name="auto2"/> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
General government debt in 1998<br>(% of GDP)<br/><ref name="auto2"/> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
Net inflows of ] in 1998 (% of GDP)<br/><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IwZREAAAQBAJ&pg=PA51|title=Enlarging the Euro Area: External Empowerment and Domestic Transformation in East Central Europe |first=Kenneth|last=Dyson|date=2 November 2006|publisher=Oxford University Press|page=51|isbn=978-0-19-151542-2 |via=Google Books}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
General government balance in 1998<br>(% of GDP)<br/><ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IwZREAAAQBAJ |title=Enlarging the Euro Area|page=47|isbn=978-0-19-151542-2 |via=Google Books|last1=Dyson |first1=Kenneth |date=2 November 2006}}</ref> | |||
! style="width:2em;"| | |||
]'s ''Nations in Transit'' score in 1998<br/>{{efn-ua|The ''Nations in Transit'' score comprises 8 categories: political process, civil society, independent media, governance and public administration, rule of law, privatization, macroeconomics and microeconomics. Each category is assigned a score from 1 (highest) to 7 (lowest). Thus, the greater the final score (8 to 56), the more authoritarian the country. In 1998, the most authoritarian of the 10 EU candidates was Romania: with a score of 33, Romania was even more authoritarian than Russia (32).<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2E9idsL5CHIC&pg=PA53 |title=Restructuring Post-Communist Russia |first1=Yitzhak |last1=Brudny |first2=Jonathan |last2=Frankel |first3=Stefani |last3=Hoffman |date=21 June 2004 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |pages=53–54 |isbn=9781139454797 |via=Google Books}}</ref>}} | |||
|- | |||
The status of ] with regard to the EU has become a matter of major significance and considerable controversy in recent years. Turkey is one of the founding members of the ] since 1949 and has been an associate member of the European Union and its predecessors since 1964 following the signing of the ] (''Ankara Agreement'') in 1963. The country formally applied for full membership on ], ], but 12 years passed before it was recognised as a candidate country at the Helsinki Summit in 1999. After a summit in Brussels on ], ], the European Council announced that membership negotiations with Turkey were officially opened on ], ]. The screening process which began on ], ] was completed on ] ]. | |||
| {{flag|Bulgaria}} || 1993-03-03 || 2000-02-15 || 8.34 || 12.7 || $4,776<br/>€4,583 || 67.3 || 47.0 || 44.3 || 65% || 59.5% || 80.6 || 95.6 || 4 || 2 || 30 | |||
|- | |||
| {{nowrap|{{flag|Czech Republic}}}} || 1993-10-04 || 1998-03-31 || 10.28 || 60.8 || $12,479<br/>€12,045 || 95.45 || 101.0 || 79.4 || 75% || 18.8% || 40.0 || 13.2 || 6 || −4 || 14 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flag|Estonia}} || 1995-06-13 || 1998-03-31 || 1.43 || 5.65 || $7,607<br/>€7,491 || 79.95 || 74.3 || 59.0 || 70% || 7.8% || 52.5 || 6.0 || 11 || 0 || 16 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flag|Hungary}} || 1991-12-16 || 1998-03-31 || 10.12 || 46.9 || $10,202<br/>€9,735 || 95.3 || 79.6 || 103.0 || 80% || 11.8% || 58.0 || 61.9 || 4 || −8 || 13 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flag|Latvia}} || 1995-06-13 || 2000-02-15 || 2.42 || 6.6 || $5,557<br/>€5,465 || 59.4 || 63.0 || 47.9 || 65% || 8.5% || 46.8 || 10.6 || 6 || −1 || 18 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flag|Lithuania}} || 1995-06-13 || 2000-02-15 || 3.69 || 11 || $6,437<br/>€6,124 || 65.6 || 44.6 || 40.6 || 70% || 45.3% || 34.2 || 16.5 || 8 || −3 || 18 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flag|Poland}} || 1991-12-16 || 1998-03-31 || 38.72 || 158.5 || $7,658<br/>€7,756 || 117.2 || 85.2 || 117.3 || 65% || 48% || 37.3 || 39.9 || 4 || −4 || 13 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flag|Romania}} || 1993-02-01 || 2000-02-15 || 22.47 || 42.1 || $5,646<br/>€5,576 || 78.1 || 61.1 || 42.5 || 60% || 74.6% || 23.6 || 27.6 || 5 || −4 || 33 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flag|Slovakia}} || 1993-10-04 || 2000-02-15 || 5.38 || 22.2 || $9,817<br/>€9,615 || 99.8 || 88.8 || 80.9 || 75% || 50% || 53.7 || 28.6 || 3 || −5 || 29 | |||
|- | |||
| {{flag|Slovenia}} || 1996-06-10 || 1998-03-31 || 1.99 || 21.1 || $14,305<br/>€13,589 || 102.25 || 86.7 || 75.9 || 60% || 41.3% || 34.7 || 22.2 || 1 || −2 || 16 | |||
|} | |||
'''Notes:''' | |||
{{notelist-ua}} | |||
In the end, eight Central and Eastern European countries (the ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]), plus two ] countries (] and ]), joined on 1 May 2004. This was the largest single enlargement in terms of people, and number of countries, though not in terms of GDP.<ref>{{Cite book |last=D'Amato |first=Giuseppe |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/58727631 |title=Viaggio nell'hansa baltica : l'Unione europea e l'allargamento ad Est |date=2004 |publisher=Greco & Greco |isbn=88-7980-355-7 |location=Milan |language=it |oclc=58727631}}</ref> The less developed nature of these countries was of concern to some of the older member states. Some countries, such as the UK, immediately opened their job market to the accession states, whereas most others placed temporary restrictions on the rights of work of the citizens of these states to their countries. The movement westward of some of the labour force of the newly acceded countries that occurred in the aftermath of the enlargement initially spawned clichés among the public opinion and media of some western countries (such as the "]"), despite the generally conceded benefit to the economies concerned.<ref>Giuseppe D'Amato, . Greco&Greco, Milan, 2008 {{ISBN|978-88-7980-456-1}}</ref> The official EU media (the speeches of the European Commission) frequently referred to the enlargement to the CEE region as "an historical opportunity" and "morally imperative", which reflected the desire of the EU to admit these countries as members, even though they were less developed than the Western European countries.<ref>"The Next Enlargement: Challenges and Opportunities: Speech by Sir Leon Brittan QC to Europapolitischer Kongress Organised By the CDU/CSU Group in the European Parliament" – Berlin 11 September 1995 and Günter Verheugen Member of the Commission responsible for Enlargement "Enlargement is irreversible": Debate on Enlargement in the European Parliament Strasbourg, 3 October 2000</ref> | |||
Turkey, classified as a ] by the ],<ref></ref> with the ] in the ]<!--behind Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Russia, and Spain--> and the fifteenth largest economy in the world,<!--behind United States, China, Japan, India, Germany, United Kingdom, Russia, France, Brazil, Italy, Spain, Mexico, Canada, and South Korea--> is part of the common EU ] since the entering into force of the ] in ]. Turkey is a founding member of the ] since 1961, a founding member of the ] since 1973 and an associate member of the ] since 1992. Turkey is also a founding member of the ] (1999) which has close ties with the European Union. | |||
Following this, ] and ], deemed as not fully ready by the commission to join in 2004, acceded instead on 1 January 2007. These, like the countries joining in 2004, faced a series of restrictions as to their citizens not fully enjoying working rights on the territory of some of the older EU members until 2014.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dąborowski |first=Tomasz |url=https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2014-01-08/citizens-bulgaria-and-romania-receive-full-rights-eu-labour-market |title=Citizens of Bulgaria and Romania receive full rights on the EU labour market |date=8 January 2014 |website=osw.waw.pl}}</ref> ] and ] did not have a ]. | |||
Proponents of Turkey's membership argue that it is a key ]<ref></ref> with ] and ]<ref></ref><ref name="economist2"></ref> that will enhance the EU's position as a global geostrategic player; given Turkey's geographic location and economic, political, cultural and historic ties in regions with large natural resources that are at the immediate vicinity of the EU's geopolitical sphere of influence; such as the ] and ] coasts, the ], the ] basin and ].<ref name= "Atatürk">{{cite book|title=Ataturk|first=Andrew|last=Mango|publisher=Overlook|year=2000|isbn=1-5856-7011-1}}</ref><ref name= "Ottoman_Turkey">{{cite book|title=History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey|first=Stanford Jay|last=Shaw|coauthors=Kural Shaw, Ezel|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1977|isbn=0-5212-9163-1}}</ref> | |||
The socio-economic research on the attitudes towards the integration from both hosting and visiting countries has revealed divergent views. The analysis shows, there are a number of possible factors of the rationalisation and understanding of the practices on what the enlargement has been and should be like. Attitudes of even sceptical citizens, do not discard the possibility on future sustainable enlargements. The years subsequent to the EU accession will lead to extensive dialogues between policy-makers, governments, and European citizens about the path for a constructive development.<ref>{{Cite book |date=24 October 2017 |editor-last=Börzel |editor-first=Tanja A. |editor2-last=Dimitrova |editor2-first=Antoaneta |editor3-last=Schimmelfennig |editor3-first=Frank |title=European Union Enlargement and Integration Capacity |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315147109 |doi=10.4324/9781315147109|isbn=978-1-315-14710-9 }}</ref> | |||
According to ], ], " would give the EU a decisive role for stability in the eastern part of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea, which is clearly in the strategic interest of Europe."<ref name="ihtbildt">{{cite news|last = Ekman|first = Ivar|title=Top Swedish official backs Turkey for EU|publisher=]|date=]|url = http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/11/news/sweden.php|accessdate=2007-07-03}}</ref> One of Turkey's key supporters for its bid to join the EU is the ]. In ], ] said during a visit to Turkey, that "Turkey is uniquely positioned as a bridge between the East and West at a crucial time for the European Union and the world in general."<ref></ref> | |||
=== Western Balkans enlargements === | |||
Proponents also argue that Turkey abides by most conditions for accession. Some maintain that the EU can no longer refuse Turkey, as it has had an open candidacy for over 40 years, and has made major ] in order to try to satisfy the entry conditions. | |||
{{further|2013 enlargement of the European Union}} | |||
There are, however, numerous arguments against Turkey's accession. Opponents include ] ].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/UKNews1/idUKL197967820080620 |title=France warns no treaty, no EU enlargement |date=2008-06-20 |accessdate=2008-06-26 |work=Reuters UK}}</ref> Others argue that Turkey does not respect the key principles that are expected in a ], such as the ], with potentially repressive laws like Article 301 (which was reformed on April 30, 2008);<ref></ref> and because of the significant role of the army on the Turkish administrative foreground through the ]; whose military-dominated structure was reformed on July 23, 2003, in line with the requests from the EU.<ref>Financial Times: ''A quiet revolution: Less power for Turkey's army is a triumph for the EU.'' July 31, 2003.</ref> Turkey's large population would also alter the balance of power in the representative European institutions. Upon joining the EU, Turkey's 70 million inhabitants would bestow it the second largest number of ]s in the ].<ref name="economist2"/> Demographic projections indicate that Turkey would surpass Germany in the number of seats by 2020.<ref name="economist2"/> Some oppose the accession of a large Muslim country. Turkey's membership would also affect future enlargement plans, especially the number of nations seeking EU membership,<ref name="economist2"/> grounds by which ] has opposed Turkey's admission. d'Estaing has suggested that it would lead to demands for accession by ]. Morocco's application is already rejected on geographic grounds, and Turkey, unlike Morocco, has ]. ] ] (then a candidate) has stated in January 2007 that "enlarging Europe with no limit risks destroying European political union, and that I do not accept...I want to say that Europe must give itself borders, that not all countries have a vocation to become members of Europe, beginning with Turkey which has no place inside the European Union."<ref name="sarkozyquote">{{cite web|url=http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=159133|title=Turkey has no place in EU: Sarkozy|accessdate=2007-04-13}}</ref> Only a small fraction of Turkish territory lies in the common geographical definition of Europe, but this is where the country's largest city and its economic and cultural capital, ], is located. EU member ] is actually located to the south of ] and is geographically a part of Anatolia's continental shelf. | |||
The 2003 European Council summit in ] set integration of the Western ] as a priority of EU expansion. The EU's relations with the ] states were moved from the "]" to the "]" policy segment in 2005. Those states which have not been recognised as candidate countries are considered "potential candidate countries".<ref>{{cite web |title=European Commission – Enlargement – Potential candidates – Enlargement |url=http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/potential-candidates/index_en.htm |access-date=28 October 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111028143123/http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/potential-candidates/index_en.htm |archive-date=28 October 2011 }}</ref> The move to ] was a consequence of the advancement of the ]. | |||
] joined on 1 July 2013, following ratification of the ] by all other EU countries. ] and the several successor states of the ] have all adopted EU integration as an aim of foreign policy. | |||
Another concern is that Turkey continues to occupy the northern third of the island of Cyprus, which became an EU member in 2004, with 40,000 Turkish troops stationed there since 1974. Turkey's original intention, which was declared by the Prime Minister of that period, ], was to avoid ] and to bring an end to the ] which took place between 1963 and 1974.<ref></ref> Since 1974, Turkey refuses to recognise the ] as the sole authority on the island, until a solution for the ] is found under the auspices of the United Nations. Historically though, the UN Security Council, in its Resolution 541 of 18 November 1983, has declared the occupation of northern Cyprus legally invalid and called for the withdrawal of Turkish forces.<ref></ref> The UN-backed ] was actively supported by the EU and Turkey. However, the Annan Plan was accepted by the ], but was rejected by the Greek Cypriots at south, in separate referenda which took place in April 2004. | |||
=== Detail === | |||
EU member states must unanimously agree on Turkey's membership for the Turkish accession to be successful. A number of nations can oppose it, notably ], which historically served as a ] for Christian Europe against the ]; and ], which is fearful of the prospect of another wave of Muslim immigrants, especially given the poor integration of its existing Muslim minority. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;" | |||
===Potential candidate countries=== | |||
! # !! Official name | |||
The EU's relations with the Western Balkans states (], ], ], and ]) were moved from the "External Relations" to the "Enlargement" policy segment. These states currently are not recognised as candidate countries, but only as "potential candidate countries".<ref>, European Union's official site</ref> This is a consequence of the advancement of the ]. | |||
! style="width:90px;"| Date | |||
! Community countries and ] | |||
! ] | |||
! ] | |||
|- | |||
| 1 || ] Foundation || {{dts|format=dmy|1952|07|23}} || ], ], ], France, Saarland, Italy, ], West Berlin{{Efn-ua|name=BER|Until the ] in 1990 the ''de jure'' status of ] was that of French, UK and US occupied zones with ] civilian administration. The treaties applied fully during 1952–1990 over the West German and French responsibilities, and during 1973–1990 over the UK responsibilities. From 3 October 1990 ] was fully integrated in the ] along with ].<ref>{{CELEX|11951K|format=PDF|text=Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and related instruments (ECSC treaty)(Paris, 18 April 1951)}}</ref><ref>{{CELEX|11972B/AFI/DCL/06|text=Documents Concerning the Accession to the European Communities of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of Norway and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Final Act, Declaration by the Government of the Federal Republic Of Germany on the Application to Berlin of the Decision Concerning Accession to the European Coal and Steel Community and of the Treaty of Accession to the European Economic Community and to the European Atomic Energy Community}}</ref>}} || || Belgian Congo, Ruanda-Urundi, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, French Tunisia, French Morocco, Adélie Land, Comoro Islands, Chad, Gabon, Middle Congo, Ubangi-Shari, French India, French Oceania,{{Efn-ua|name=FP|Renamed French Polynesia on 1957-07-22}} Clipperton Island, French Somaliland, Dahomey, French Guinea, French Sudan, Ivory Coast, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, Upper Volta, French Cameroons, French Togoland, Madagascar, Crozet Islands, Kerguelen Islands, Saint-Paul-and-Amsterdam Islands, New Caledonia, Wallis-et-Futuna, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Réunion, French Algeria, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Scattered Islands in the Indian Ocean, French-administration of the New Hebrides,{{Efn-ua|name=VU|The New Hebrides was a ] between the United Kingdom and France until its independence in 1980, and was generally considered to be an overseas territory of both countries}} Italian Somaliland, Netherlands New Guinea, Surinam, Netherlands Antilles | |||
|- | |||
| || || 1953–1957 || the above, Saarland joined West Germany || || the above without the newly independent: Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, French Tunisia, French Morocco, French India;{{Efn-ua|name=IND|Became part of India on 1954-07-21}} and without Adélie Land, Crozet Islands, Kerguelen Islands, Saint-Paul-and-Amsterdam Islands{{Efn-ua|name=TAF|Adélie Land, Crozet Islands, Kerguelen Islands and Saint-Paul-and-Amsterdam Islands merged to become the French Southern and Antarctic Lands on 1955-08-06. All territories were already outside the ECSC and the merged territory retained the same status}} | |||
|- | |||
| 2 || ] and ] Foundation || {{dts|format=dmy|1958|01|01}} || the above, ], Réunion, ], Martinique, ]|| French Guinea, French Cameroons, French Togoland,{{Efn-ua|name=TOG|Renamed Togo on 1958-02-22}} French Sudan,{{Efn-ua|name=MAL|Renamed Sudanese Republic on 1958-11-24}}{{Efn-ua|name=SRS|Senegal and the Sudanese Republic merged on 1959-04-04 to create the Mali Federation}} Senegal,{{Efn-ua|name=SRS}} Madagascar,{{Efn-ua|name=MR|Renamed Malagasy Republic on 1958-10-14}} Belgian Congo, Italian Somaliland, Dahomey, Niger, Upper Volta, Ivory Coast, Chad, Ubangi-Shari, Middle Congo,{{Efn-ua|name=MC|Renamed Congo on 1958-11-28}} Gabon, Mauritania, Ruanda-Urundi, Netherlands New Guinea, Comoro Islands, French Somaliland,{{Efn-ua|name=SAI|Renamed French Territory of the Afars and the Issas in 1967}} French-administration of the New Hebrides,{{Efn-ua|name=VU}} St. Pierre and Miquelon, Wallis and Futuna, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, French Southern and Antarctic Lands, Scattered islands in the Indian Ocean || the above, West Berlin, without Scattered islands in the Indian Ocean | |||
|- | |||
| || || 1958–1962 || the above || the above, without the newly independent: French Guinea, French Cameroons, Togo, Mali Federation, Malagasy Republic, Belgian Congo, Italian Somaliland, Dahomey, Niger, Upper Volta, Ivory Coast, Chad, Central African Republic, Congo, Gabon, Mauritania, Ruanda-Urundi,{{Efn-ua|name=RB|Became independent as the Kingdom of Ruanda and the Kingdom of Burundi}} Netherlands New Guinea{{Efn-ua|name=NNG|Annexed by Indonesia in 1962}} || the above | |||
|- | |||
| || || {{dts|format=dmy|1962|07|03}} || the above, without the newly independent: ]|| the above || the above | |||
|- | |||
| || || {{dts|format=dmy|1962|09|01}} || the above || the above, with Surinam<ref>"The provisions of Part Four of the Treaty were applied to Surinam, by virtue of a Supplementary Act of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to complete its instrument of ratification, from 1 September 1962 to 16 July 1976.", in: eur-lex.europa.eu – {{CELEX|12006E/TXT|text=Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version)}}</ref>|| the above, without Surinam | |||
|- | |||
| || ]<ref>{{CELEX|11962E/CNV/NL|text=CONVENTION portant révision du traité instituant la Communauté économique européenne en vue de rendre applicable aux Antilles néerlandaises le régime spécial d' association défini dans la quatrième partie de se traité}}</ref>|| {{dts|format=dmy|1964|10|01}} || the above || the above, with the Netherlands Antilles || the above, without the Netherlands Antilles | |||
|- | |||
| 3 || First Enlargement || {{dts|format=dmy|1973|01|01}} || the above, ], United Kingdom, ], ]{{Efn-ua|name=DG|Including the County of Greenland, which later gained home rule and left the EC}} || the above, Antigua, Redonda, Dominica, Grenada, St. Christopher-Nevis-Anguilla, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Brunei, Canton and Enderbury Islands,{{Efn-ua|name=CEK|The UK co-administered the condominium of the Canton and Enderbury Islands with the US, until the UK merged it with its Gilbert and Ellice Islands colony on 1975-01-01 to create its Gilbert Islands colony. As such it ceased to be a condominium, but the US continued to claim it until 1979}} Bahama Islands, Bermuda, British Antarctic Territory, British Honduras,{{Efn-ua|name=BBH|Renamed Belize on 1973-06-01}} British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, British Western Pacific Territories,{{Efn-ua|name=BSI|Renamed the British Solomon Islands on 1976-01-02}} Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Falkland Islands Dependencies,{{Efn-ua|name=SGI|Renamed South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands in 1985}} Gilbert and Ellice Islands,{{Efn-ua|name=GEI|Split into the Gilbert Islands (which was merged with the Canton and Enderbury Islands) and Ellice Island on 1975-01-01}} Montserrat, Pitcairn Islands, St. Helena, Ascension Island, Tristan da Cunha, Seychelles, New Hebrides,{{Efn-ua|name=VU}} Turks and Caicos Islands|| the above, the Faroe Islands, Akrotiri and Dhekelia,{{Efn-ua|name=AD|British Sovereign Base Areas on the island of Cyprus}} the Isle of Man, Jersey, Guernsey, Alderney, Sark, Rhodesia,{{Efn-ua|name=RZ|Legally a British colony until independence in 1980}} Hong Kong | |||
|- | |||
| || || 1973–1980 || the above || the above, Barbuda,{{Efn-ua|name=AAB|The island of Barbuda became a separate territory from Antigua on 1976-12-23}} Mayotte,{{Efn-ua|name=COM|The island of Mayotte became a separate territory in 1974, and chose to remain with France, rather than become independent}} without the newly independent Bahama Islands, Grenada, St. Vincent, Seychelles, British Solomon Islands, Surinam, Ellice Island, Dominica, St. Lucia, Gilbert Islands, New Hebrides, Comoro Islands{{Efn-ua|name=COM}} and French Territory of the Afars and the Issas || the above without the newly independent Rhodesia | |||
|- | |||
| 4 || Second Enlargement || {{dts|format=dmy|1981|01|01}} || the above, ]|| the above || the above | |||
|- | |||
| || || 1981–1984 || the above || the above, Anguilla,{{Efn-ua|name=CNA|Anguilla stayed a British colony, while Saint Christopher and Nevis became independent as St. Kitts and Nevis}} without the newly independent Belize, Antigua, Barbuda, Redonda,{{Efn-ua|name=ABR|Antigua, Barbuda and Redonda merged to become independent as Antigua and Barbuda}} St. Christopher and Nevis{{Efn-ua|name=CNA}} and Brunei || the above | |||
|- | |||
| || || {{dts|format=dmy|1985|01|01}} || the above without ]|| the above, Greenland || the above | |||
|- | |||
| 5 || Third Enlargement || {{dts|format=dmy|1986|01|01}} || the above, Spain, ], ], ], ], Canary Islands|| the above, with Aruba, formerly part of the Netherlands Antilles{{Efn-ua|name=ARB|Although Aruba was only added to the OCT list with the entry into force of the ] in 1999, it was considered an OCT by the European Communities since leaving the Netherlands Antilles: "De eilandgebieden zullen dus de rechten en plichten van de LGO-status van het Land de Nederlandse Antillen overnemen, wanneer dat opgeheven wordt. Hetzelfde gebeurde in 1986 toen Aruba van eilandgebied van de Nederlandse Antillen een apart Land binnen het Koninkrijk werd. Hoewel de LGO-bijlage pas in 1999 aan deze situatie werd aangepast, heeft de Europese Gemeenschap Aruba van het begin af aan als LGO behandeld." in: Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.minbuza.nl/ecer/Verdrag_van_Lissabon/Repertorium_Verdrag_van_Lissabon/Grondwettelijke_aspecten/Territoriale_werking_Antillen|title=Grondwettelijke aspecten: Territoriale werking / Antillen}}</ref>}}{{Efn-ua|name=NEA|The Netherlands Antilles dissolved on 10 October 2010 and contained the islands of Aruba (which left the Netherlands Antilles in 1986), Bonaire, Curacao, Sint Maarten, Saba and Sint Eustatius. Aruba, Curacao and Sint Maarten are autonomous countries in the Kingdom of Netherlands, and remain overseas territories of the European Union. Bonaire, St Eustatius and Saba, also known as the ], are special municipalities of the Netherlands, and remained legally overseas territories}} || the above, Macau, East Timor{{Efn-ua|name=ETL|''De jure'' a Portuguese colony under Indonesian occupation until 1999}} | |||
|- | |||
| || German reunification || {{dts|format=dmy|1990|10|03}} || the above, ] and ] join to form Germany|| the above || the above without West Berlin | |||
|- | |||
| 6 || Fourth Enlargement || {{dts|format=dmy|1995|01|01}} || the above, ], Sweden, ]|| the above || the above | |||
|- | |||
| || || {{dts|format=dmy|1997|07|01}} || the above || the above || the above, without Hong Kong{{Efn-ua|name=CH|Transferred to China}} | |||
|- | |||
| || || {{dts|format=dmy|1999|12|20}} || the above || the above || the above, without Macau{{Efn-ua|name=CH}} | |||
|- | |||
| || || {{dts|format=dmy|2002|05|20}} || the above || the above || the above, without the newly independent East Timor | |||
|- | |||
| 7 || Fifth Enlargement<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication_summary14301_en.htm|title=361 – An evaluation of the EU's Fifth Enlargement With special focus on Bulgaria & Romania |department=Fritz Breuss, Research Institute for European Affairs (Europainstitut) and Vienna University of Economics & Business Administration – European Commission|date=3 June 2009 |publisher=European Commission|access-date=2016-04-21}}</ref> || {{dts|format=dmy|2004|05|01}} || the above, ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]|| the above, Akrotiri and Dhekelia<ref name="SBA">{{cite web|url=http://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement_new/treaty/doc_en/aa00042en03.doc |format=DOC |title=PROTOCOL No 1 : ON AMENDMENTS TO THE STATUTE OF THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK |publisher=European Parliament |access-date=2016-04-21}}</ref> || the above, without Akrotiri and Dhekelia<ref name="SBA" /> | |||
|- | |||
| 8 || Sixth Enlargement || {{dts|format=dmy|2007|01|01}} || the above, ], ]|| the above || the above | |||
|- | |||
| || || {{dts|format=dmy|2007|02|22}} || the above, ], ]{{Efn-ua|name=GBM|Saint Martin and Saint Barthélemy were part of Guadeloupe and thus already part of the EU. On 2007-02-22, they became separate territories but France retained application of EU law there, and their EU OMR status was confirmed in the Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 2009-01-01.}} || the above, without Scattered islands in the Indian Ocean{{Efn-ua|name=TAA|The Scattered islands in the Indian Ocean became part of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands on 2007-02-22. Both territories were already EU OCTs and the merged territory retained the same status.}} || the above | |||
|- | |||
| || || {{dts|format=dmy|2010|10|10}} || the above || the above, without the now-dissolved Netherlands Antilles, with Curaçao, Sint Maarten, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, Saba{{Efn-ua|name=NEA}} || the above | |||
|- | |||
| || || {{dts|format=dmy|2012-01-01}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:325:0004:0005:EN:PDF|title=EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION of 29 October 2010 amending the status with regard to the European Union of the island of Saint-Barthélemy|website=Eur-lex.europa.eu|access-date=2016-04-21}}</ref> || the above, without ]|| the above, Saint Barthélemy || the above | |||
|- | |||
| 9 || Seventh Enlargement <br /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://oami.europa.eu/ows/rw/pages/OHIM/institutional/enlargement/enlargement13.en.do |title=Home|publisher=Europa (web portal)|access-date=2016-04-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.vlada.hr/en/naslovnica/novosti_i_najave/2013/lipanj/ek_ulazak_hrvatske_u_eu_dokaz_da_je_europska_perspektiva_realnost |title=European Council President welcomes Croatia |website=News and Announcements |publisher=Government of the Republic Croatia |access-date=23 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130916073616/http://vlada.hr/en/naslovnica/novosti_i_najave/2013/lipanj/ek_ulazak_hrvatske_u_eu_dokaz_da_je_europska_perspektiva_realnost |archive-date=16 September 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/art2_mb201211en_pp87-104en.pdf |title=RECENT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN EU CANDIDATE COUNTRIES |publisher=Europa (web portal) |access-date=2016-04-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/summit-enlargement.pik |title=EU welcomes Croatia's 'historic moment' on eve of entry |website=Eubusiness.com|access-date=2016-04-21}}</ref> || {{dts|format=dmy|2013|07|01}} || the above, ]|| the above || the above | |||
|- | |||
| 10 || || {{dts|format=dmy|2014-01-01}}<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:204:0131:0131:EN:PDF|title=EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION of 11 July 2012 amending the status of Mayotte with regard to the European Union|website=Eur-lex.europa.eu|access-date=2016-04-21}}</ref> || the above, ]|| the above, without Mayotte || the above | |||
|- | |||
| 11 || Withdrawal of the United Kingdom || Transition period: {{dts|format=dmy|2020-02-01}} to {{dts|format=dmy|2020-12-31}}<ref>Article 126 of the {{CELEX|02020W/TXT-20240517|text=Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community}}</ref> || the above, without United Kingdom, ]|| the above without Akrotiri and Dhekelia, Anguilla, Bermuda, British Antarctic Territory, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Montserrat, Pitcairn, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, and Turks and Caicos Islands || the above without the Isle of Man, Jersey, Guernsey | |||
|} | |||
'''Notes:''' | |||
{{notelist-ua}} | |||
=== Timeline === | |||
The successor states of the ] (], ], ], ], ], and ]), as well as ],<ref name="EU Council on Kosovo">{{cite web |title=EU/Kosovo Factsheet |publisher= European Union - Delegation of the European Commission to the United States|url=http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/gena/98770.pdf |accessdate=2007-03-27}}</ref> have all adopted EU integration as an aim of foreign policy. Slovenia joined the EU on ] ]. Croatia is currently negotiating its entry. The Republic of Macedonia is recognised as an EU candidate country. | |||
{{left| | |||
The Western Balkan nation of Albania, which was isolated from the rest of Europe for decades until the early 1990s, has adopted EU integration as the strategic orientation of the country. | |||
{{#tag:timeline| | |||
DateFormat = dd/mm/yyyy | |||
ImageSize = width:1000 height:auto barincrement:20 | |||
PlotArea = left:20 right:20 bottom:30 top:15 | |||
Colors = | |||
The EU signed an agreement with Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and the ] on 13 April 2007, and Serbia on 15 May 2007, which included visa facilitations for the citizens of these countries. The signing EU ] ] was quoted saying that this is the first step toward a full abolishment of the visa requirements and the free movement of the Western Balkans citizens in EU. Negotiations for a visa-free travel regime with the aforementioned countries are expected to start in January 2008. <ref>, BIRN, 26 June 2007</ref> | |||
id:1952 value:blue legend:European_Coal_and_Steel_Community_established | |||
id:1958 value:green legend:European_Economic_Community_(&_Euratom)_established | |||
id:1967 value:yellow legend:European_Communities_established | |||
id:1993 value:red legend:European_Union_established | |||
id:applicant value:blue legend:Period_of_being_an_applicant_/_candidate | |||
The 2003 European Council summit in ] set integration of the Western ] as a priority of EU expansion. A further meeting in ], Romania, concluded that "Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, FYR Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro are considered likely to join the EU between 2010 and 2015" depending on their fulfillment of the adhesion criteria.{{Fact|date=November 2007}} This summit was attended by two EU members, seven countries now in the EU, and the eight EU hopefuls (Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, ], Montenegro, Serbia, and ]). However, this summit was not linked to any EU institution, whatsoever, and the target dates and agreements presented there mainly aimed at encouraging the candidate and potential candidate countries on their way to eventual full membership into the EU. | |||
id:frozen value:skyblue legend:Period_of_frozen_or_withdrawn_application_for_membership | |||
id:member value:darkblue legend:Period_of_being_a_member_state | |||
id:eurozone value:yelloworange legend:Period_of_being_a_eurozone_state | |||
id:gray value:gray(0.7) | |||
On ] ], the ] suggested in a new strategy paper that the current enlargement agenda (Croatia, ] and the Western Balkans) could potentially block the possibility of a future accession of ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>, European Union's official site</ref> ] has said on occasion that the EU should "avoid overstretching our capacity, and instead consolidate our enlargement agenda," adding, "this is already a challenging agenda for our accession process."<ref>, International Herald Tribune, 1 February 2006</ref> | |||
id:lightgray value:gray(0.92) | |||
Define $end = {{#time: d/m/Y}} | |||
===Netherlands Antilles=== | |||
Period = from:01/01/1945 till:$end | |||
{{main|Netherlands Antilles and the European Union}} | |||
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal format:yyyy | |||
On 15 December 2008, The Caribbean islands of ], ] and ] will become part of the Netherlands as ]. The government of the Netherlands is currently investigating the consequences of a change of status within the European Union for these islands. They are currently listed as ] in Annex II of the ] and as such are not considered part of the EU. The islands are opting to become an ] of the EU, the same status the ], ], the ] and the ] have. ] ] has said before the ] that she doesn't expect many problems to occur with such a status change, as the islands' population only consists of some 30,000 people. As the islands are currently listed in an Annex of the Treaty of Rome, the treaty needs to be changed before the new status can take effect.<ref name="RNW">{{nl}} Radio Netherlands - </ref> | |||
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:5 start:1950 gridcolor:gray | |||
ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:1 start:1951 gridcolor:lightgray | |||
AlignBars = justify | |||
Legend = left:40 top:180 | |||
BarData = | |||
==See also== | |||
bar:FR | |||
{{EU history}} | |||
bar:DE | |||
* ] | |||
bar:IT | |||
* ] | |||
bar:BE | |||
* ] | |||
bar:NL | |||
bar:LU | |||
bar:IE | |||
bar:GB | |||
bar:DK | |||
bar:ES | |||
bar:NO | |||
bar:GR | |||
bar:PT | |||
bar:TR | |||
bar:MA | |||
bar:AT | |||
bar:CY | |||
bar:MT | |||
bar:SE | |||
bar:FI | |||
bar:CH | |||
bar:HU | |||
bar:PL | |||
bar:RO | |||
bar:SK | |||
bar:LV | |||
bar:EE | |||
bar:LT | |||
bar:BG | |||
bar:CZ | |||
bar:SI | |||
bar:HR | |||
bar:MK | |||
bar:ME | |||
bar:AL | |||
bar:IS | |||
bar:RS | |||
bar:BA | |||
bar:UA | |||
bar:GE | |||
bar:MD | |||
bar:XK | |||
PlotData = | |||
width:14 fontsize:S textcolor:black anchor:from align:left | |||
bar:FR color:member from:23/07/1952 till:01/01/2002 shift:(-37,-5) text:France | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:DE color:member from:23/07/1952 till:01/01/2002 shift:(-80,-5) text:(West) Germany | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:IT color:member from:23/07/1952 till:01/01/2002 shift:(-24,-5) text:Italy | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:BE color:member from:23/07/1952 till:01/01/2002 shift:(-42,-5) text:Belgium | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:NL color:member from:23/07/1952 till:01/01/2002 shift:(-61,-5) text:Netherlands | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:LU color:member from:23/07/1952 till:01/01/2002 shift:(-62,-5) text:Luxembourg | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:IE color:applicant from:31/07/1961 till:14/01/1963 shift:(-36,-5) text:Ireland | |||
textcolor:black at:14/01/1963 shift:(02,-5) text:withdrawn | |||
color:frozen from:14/01/1963 till:11/05/1967 | |||
color:applicant from:11/05/1967 till:31/12/1972 | |||
color:member from:01/01/1973 till:01/01/2002 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:GB color:applicant from:10/08/1961 till:14/01/1963 shift:(-80,-5) text:United Kingdom | |||
textcolor:red at:14/01/1963 shift:(05,-5) text:vetoed | |||
color:applicant from:10/05/1967 till:31/12/1972 | |||
color:member from:01/01/1973 till:31/01/2020 | |||
color:frozen from:31/01/2020 till:01/01/2021 shift:(-105,-5) text:"withdrawal agreement" textcolor:white | |||
bar:DK color:applicant from:10/08/1961 till:14/01/1963 shift:(-47,-5) text:Denmark | |||
textcolor:black at:14/01/1963 shift:(02,-5) text:withdrawn | |||
color:frozen from:14/01/1963 till:11/05/1967 | |||
color:applicant from:11/05/1967 till:31/12/1972 | |||
color:member from:01/01/1973 till:end | |||
bar:ES color:applicant from:09/02/1962 till:06/03/1962 shift:(-38,-5) text:Spain | |||
textcolor:red at:06/03/1962 shift:(05,-5) text:rejected | |||
color:applicant from:28/07/1977 till:31/12/1985 | |||
color:member from:01/01/1986 till:01/01/2002 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:NO color:applicant from:30/04/1962 till:14/01/1963 shift:(-39,-5) text:Norway | |||
color:frozen from:14/01/1963 till:21/07/1967 | |||
textcolor:black at:14/01/1963 shift:(02,-5) text:withdrawn | |||
color:applicant from:21/07/1967 till:25/09/1972 | |||
color:frozen from:25/09/1972 till:25/11/1992 | |||
textcolor:black at:25/09/1972 shift:(05,-5) text:withdrawn | |||
color:applicant from:25/11/1992 till:28/11/1994 | |||
color:frozen from:28/11/1994 till:end | |||
textcolor:black at:28/11/1994 shift:(05,-5) text:withdrawn | |||
bar:GR color:applicant from:12/06/1975 till:31/12/1980 shift:(-38,-5) text:Greece | |||
color:member from:01/01/1981 till:01/01/2002 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:PT color:applicant from:28/03/1977 till:31/12/1985 shift:(-44,-5) text:Portugal | |||
color:member from:01/01/1986 till:01/01/2002 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:TR color:applicant from:14/04/1987 till:20/02/2019 shift:(-38,-5) text:Turkey | |||
color:frozen from:20/02/2019 till:end | |||
textcolor:yelloworange at:03/10/2005 shift:(-05,-5) text:negotiating | |||
textcolor:red at:20/02/2019 shift:(05, -5) text: frozen | |||
bar:MA color:applicant from:20/07/1987 till:01/10/1987 shift:(-43,-5) text:Morocco | |||
textcolor:red at:01/10/1987 shift:(05,-5) text:rejected | |||
bar:AT color:applicant from:17/07/1989 till:31/12/1994 shift:(-38,-5) text:Austria | |||
color:member from:01/01/1995 till:01/01/2002 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:CY color:applicant from:03/07/1990 till:30/04/2004 shift:(-40,-5) text:Cyprus | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:01/01/2008 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2008 till:end | |||
bar:MT color:applicant from:03/07/1990 till:01/11/1996 shift:(-31,-5) text:Malta | |||
color:frozen from:01/11/1996 till:31/10/1998 | |||
color:applicant from:31/10/1998 till:30/04/2004 | |||
textcolor:black at:01/11/1996 shift:(02,-5) text:frozen | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:01/01/2008 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2008 till:end | |||
bar:SE color:applicant from:01/07/1991 till:31/12/1994 shift:(-43,-5) text:Sweden | |||
color:member from:01/01/1995 till:end | |||
bar:FI color:applicant from:18/03/1992 till:31/12/1994 shift:(-41,-5) text:Finland | |||
color:member from:01/01/1995 till:01/01/2002 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2002 till:end | |||
bar:CH color:applicant from:25/05/1992 till:06/12/1992 shift:(-59,-5) text:Switzerland | |||
color:frozen from:06/12/1992 till:end | |||
textcolor:black at:06/12/1992 shift:(05,-5) text:frozen | |||
textcolor:black at:27/07/2016 shift:(-31,-5) text:withdrawn | |||
bar:HU color:applicant from:31/03/1994 till:30/04/2004 shift:(-46,-5) text:Hungary | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:end | |||
bar:PL color:applicant from:05/04/1994 till:30/04/2004 shift:(-39,-5) text:Poland | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:end | |||
bar:RO color:applicant from:22/06/1995 till:31/12/2006 shift:(-46,-5) text:Romania | |||
color:member from:01/01/2007 till:end | |||
bar:SK color:applicant from:27/06/1995 till:30/04/2004 shift:(-44,-5) text:Slovakia | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:01/01/2009 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2009 till:end | |||
bar:LV color:applicant from:13/10/1995 till:30/04/2004 shift:(-33,-5) text:Latvia | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:01/01/2014 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2014 till:end | |||
bar:EE color:applicant from:24/11/1995 till:30/04/2004 shift:(-40,-5) text:Estonia | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:01/01/2011 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2011 till:end | |||
bar:LT color:applicant from:08/12/1995 till:30/04/2004 shift:(-49,-5) text:Lithuania | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:01/01/2015 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2015 till:end | |||
bar:BG color:applicant from:14/12/1995 till:31/12/2006 shift:(-44,-5) text:Bulgaria | |||
color:member from:01/01/2007 till:end | |||
bar:CZ color:applicant from:17/01/1996 till:30/04/2004 shift:(-77,-5) text:Czech Republic | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:end | |||
bar:SI color:applicant from:10/06/1996 till:30/04/2004 shift:(-44,-5) text:Slovenia | |||
color:member from:01/05/2004 till:01/01/2007 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2007 till:end | |||
bar:HR color:applicant from:21/02/2003 till:30/06/2013 shift:(-38,-5) text:Croatia | |||
color:member from:01/07/2013 till:01/01/2023 | |||
color:eurozone from:01/01/2023 till:end | |||
bar:MK color:applicant from:22/03/2004 till:end shift:(-82,-5) text:North Macedonia | |||
textcolor:yelloworange at:29/03/2020 shift:(-110,-5) text:negotiating | |||
bar:ME color:applicant from:15/12/2008 till:end shift:(-59,-5) text:Montenegro | |||
textcolor:yelloworange at:29/06/2012 shift:(-24,-5) text:negotiating | |||
bar:AL color:applicant from:28/04/2009 till:end shift:(-38,-5) text:Albania | |||
textcolor:yelloworange at:29/03/2020 shift:(-99,-5) text:negotiating | |||
bar:IS color:applicant from:17/07/2009 till:13/06/2013 shift:(-38,-5) text:Iceland | |||
color:frozen from:13/06/2013 till:end | |||
textcolor:black at:17/07/2009 shift:(50,-5) text:withdrawn | |||
bar:RS color:applicant from:22/12/2009 till:end shift:(-38,-5) text:Serbia | |||
textcolor:yelloworange at:21/01/2014 shift:(-32,-5) text:negotiating | |||
bar:BA color:applicant from:15/02/2016 till:end shift:(-120,-5) text:Bosnia and Herzegovina | |||
bar:UA color:applicant from:28/02/2022 till:end shift:(-40,-5) text:Ukraine | |||
bar:GE color:applicant from:03/03/2022 till:end shift:(-40,-5) text:Georgia | |||
bar:MD color:applicant from:03/03/2022 till:end shift:(-40,-5) text:Moldova | |||
bar:XK color:applicant from:14/12/2022 till:end shift:(-40,-5) text:Kosovo | |||
LineData = | |||
layer:front at:23/07/1952 width:1 frompos:190 color:blue | |||
layer:front at:01/01/1958 width:1 frompos:190 color:green | |||
layer:front at:01/07/1967 width:1 frompos:190 color:yellow | |||
layer:front at:01/11/1993 width:1 color:red | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||
{{clear}} | |||
== Potential enlargements == | |||
{{Main|Potential enlargement of the European Union}} | |||
=== Current enlargement agenda === | |||
[[File:European Union member states and candidates v2.svg|thumb|upright=1.35| | |||
{{Legend|#003399|Current members (27)}} | |||
{{Legend|#46a43b|Candidates negotiating (6)}} | |||
{{Legend|#71f268|Candidates (2)}} | |||
{{Legend|#ffd617|Applicant / Potential candidate (1)}} | |||
{{Legend|#da2131|Candidate with frozen negotiations (1)}}]] | |||
Article 49 of the ] (as amended) says that any European state that respects the "principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law", may apply to join the Union. The ] set out the conditions for EU membership in June 1993 in the so-called ] (see ] above for details). The Western ] states had to sign ]s (SAAs) before applying for membership, but have been prioritised with an open path to apply for membership and roadmap for an accession perspective, since emerging from the ] in the early 1990s and subsequent ]. | |||
] are currently ongoing with ] (since 2012), ] (since 2014), ] (since 2020), ] (since 2020), ] (since 2024) and ] (since 2024). ] were opened in October 2005,<ref name="TUR2006"/> but have been effectively frozen by the EU since December 2016,<ref name="Yahoo"/><ref name="CouncilDecisions2018"/><ref name="CouncilDecisions2023"/> due to backsliding in the areas of democracy, rule of law, and fundamental rights.<ref name="Yahoo"/><ref name="AljazeeraSep2023"/><ref name="TurkeyStatus"/> | |||
The most advanced stage of the negotiations, defined as meeting the interim benchmarks for negotiation chapter 23 and 24 which allow the closing process of all negotiation chapters to start, has so far only been reached by Montenegro.<ref name="Montenegro in Closing Phase">{{Cite web|url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/06/26/sixteenth-meeting-of-the-accession-conference-with-montenegro-at-ministerial-level/|title=Sixteenth meeting of the Accession Conference with Montenegro at Ministerial level (press release by the Council of the EU)|website=Consilium|author=Council of the European Union|date=26 June 2024|access-date=1 August 2024}}</ref> Montenegro's declared political goal is to achieve membership of the EU by 2028.<ref name="Montenegro2028">{{Cite web|url=https://www.bta.bg/en/news/balkans/691717-president-radev-bulgaria-supports-montenegro-s-european-integration|title=President Radev: Bulgaria Supports Montenegro's European Integration|website=BTA|author1=Tatiana Marinova|author2=Simona-Alex Mihaleva|date=17 June 2024|access-date=1 August 2024}}</ref><ref name="Montenegro2028PM">{{Cite web |format=video|author=Milojko Spajić|date=16 December 2024 |title=Press conference - Part 2 - Preliminary remarks by Milojko Spajić, Prime Minister of Montenegro, during the press conference following the EU-Montenegro Intergovernmental Conference on 16 December 2024 in Brussels|url=https://newsroom.consilium.europa.eu/permalink/258708|access-date=16 December 2024 |website=Consilium}}</ref> | |||
] and ] were granted official candidate status respectively in December 2022<ref name="BIHcandidate"/><ref name="BIHstatus"/> and December 2023,<ref name="GEOstatus"/> but were asked to complete additional reforms before qualifying for the formal start of membership negotiations. ] submitted an application for membership in December 2022.<ref name="KosovoApli"/> For Kosovo to be granted official candidate status, the ] will need to unanimously agree to start Kosovo's accession process by requesting an opinion from the ] on its application. The EU however remains divided on its policy towards Kosovo, with five ] not ]. | |||
====EU enlargement policy==== | |||
On 6 February 2018, the European Commission published its expansion plan,<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/news/strategy-western-balkans-2018-feb-06_en |title=Strategy for the Western Balkans |date=6 February 2018 |website=Europa: European Commission |access-date=18 May 2018 }}</ref> which covers the six Western Balkan countries. The plan envisages that all six applicants could achieve accession as members of the European Union after 2025. In May 2018, Bulgaria—holding the rotating ]—hosted a summit on the Western Balkans, which aimed to facilitate accession by the six, including enhanced regional security cooperation and regional connectivity.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-summit/2018/05/17/ |title=EU-Western Balkans summit in Sofia |date=17 May 2018 |website=Council of Europe |access-date=18 May 2018}}</ref> | |||
It was noteworthy that the Summit referred to "partners" rather than states: this reflects that Kosovo is only ] as a state.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://balkaninsight.com/2018/04/23/sofia-summit-declaration-calls-western-balkan-participants-partners-04-23-2018/ |title=Balkans Labeled 'Partners' Instead of 'States' for Sofia Summit |last=Martin |first=Dimitrov |date=23 April 2018 |work=Balkan Insight |access-date=18 May 2013}}</ref> {{As of|2018}}, Kosovo was not recognised by fellow Western Balkan applicant Serbia and existing EU members ], ], ], ], and ]. The European Commission is sensitive to the issue, which was addressed in a speech by the EU's High Representative/Vice-President ] at the European Parliament Plenary Session on the Western Balkan Strategy: "shared, unequivocal, concrete perspective for European Union integration for each and every one of the six partners. Each at its own pace, with its own specificities and under different conditions, but the direction is clear and is one."<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.eeas.europa.eu/node/39451_en |title=Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the European Parliament Plenary Session on the Western Balkan Strategy |date=6 February 2018 |work=European Union External Action Service |access-date=18 May 2018}}</ref> | |||
Amid the ], the three ] ] of ], ] and ] submitted applications for EU membership.<ref>{{cite news |last=Treisman |first=Rachel |title=Ukraine wants to join the EU. Here's how that would work |url=https://www.npr.org/2022/02/28/1083528087/ukraine-european-union |access-date=28 February 2022 |work=NPR |date=28 February 2022}}</ref><ref name="bbc.com">{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-europe-60582327 |title='New reality' prompts Georgia's urgent application to join EU |access-date=2 March 2022 |website=BBC News |language=en-gb |archive-date=4 March 2022 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220304033454/https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-europe-60582327 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="digi24.ro">{{cite web |title=Maia Sandu a semnat cererea de aderare a Republicii Moldova la Uniunea Europeană |url=https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/externe/maia-sandu-a-semnat-cererea-de-aderare-a-republicii-moldova-la-uniunea-europeana-1859015 |access-date=3 March 2022 |website=Digi24 |language=ro-ro}}</ref> | |||
The ] subsequently voted to accept an emergency petition from the government of Ukraine for EU member state candidacy.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-699042 |work=The Jerusalem Post |title=European Parliament recommends giving Ukraine EU candidate status |date=1 March 2022 |access-date=1 March 2022}}</ref> On 17 June 2022, the European Commission recommended that Ukraine and Moldova become candidates for EU membership and that Georgia be recognised as a potential candidate but that it would need to "meet certain conditions" to be granted candidate status. These conditions included investing more in education and infrastructure and completing several reforms in elections, judicial independence, crime, corruption, and oligarchs. These recommendations were approved by the ] during a summit on 23 June.<ref>{{cite news |date=17 June 2022 |title=European Commission backs Ukraine for EU candidate status |publisher=Al Jazeera |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/6/17/eu-to-give-fast-tracked-opinion-on-ukraine-membership-bid |access-date=17 June 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_22_3800 |title=Opinion on the EU membership application by Georgia |date=17 June 2022 |publisher=] |access-date=11 January 2023}}</ref> | |||
On 14 December 2023, the European Council granted candidate status to Georgia, agreed to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, and announced that the opening of accession negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina would be reconsidered once certain conditions were met with an update expected in March 2024.<ref>{{cite web |title=EU to begin Ukraine accession negotiations, says Michel |url=https://www.rte.ie/news/ukraine/2023/1214/1421901-ukraine-russia-latest// |access-date=24 December 2022 |date=14 December 2023 |work=RTE}}</ref> On 9 July 2024 the European Union halted Georgia's accession into the European union after their authorities adopted a new "foreign influence" law which some fear might curb democratic freedom.<ref>{{cite web |title=EU halts Georgia's accession to the bloc, freezes aid over much-criticized law |url=https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/eu-halts-georgias-accession-bloc-freezes-financial-aid-111770715 |access-date=11 July 2024 |date=9 July 2024}}</ref> | |||
{{further|Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union|Accession of Ukraine to the European Union|Accession of Moldova to the European Union|Accession of Georgia to the European Union|Accession of Kosovo to the European Union}} | |||
=== Potential enlargement agenda === | |||
[[File:European Union future possible members 2.0.svg|thumb|Countries that could join the European Union | |||
{{legend|#003399|Current members}} | |||
{{legend|#46a43b|Candidate countries}} | |||
{{legend|#ffd617|Applicant / potential candidate countries}} | |||
{{legend|#F29527|Membership possible}} | |||
{{legend|#da2131|Membership not possible}} | |||
{{legend|#c39467|Located at least partially in Europe}}]] | |||
On 5 March 2024, Armenian Prime Minister ] stated that ] would apply for EU candidacy by Autumn 2024 at the latest.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://hraparak.am/post/c1bb9ccbee31e8bfe4661e7849e99a75|title=NIKOL PASHINYAN SAID THAT YOU SHOULD APPLY TO BECOME A CANDIDATE FOR EU MEMBERSHIP BEFORE AUTUMN AT THE LATEST|website=hraparak.am}}</ref> On 12 March 2024, the European Parliament passed a resolution confirming Armenia meets Maastricht Treaty ] requirements and that the country may apply for EU membership.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-9-2024-0163_EN.html|title=Joint Motion for a Resolution on closer ties between the EU and Armenia and the need for a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia | RC-B9-0163/2024 | European Parliament|website=www.europarl.europa.eu}}</ref> | |||
{{further|Armenia–European Union relations}} | |||
=== Abandoned enlargement negotiations === | |||
Several sovereign states have previously submitted applications for membership to the EU but are ]: | |||
* ] has completed membership negotiations twice, in 1972 and 1994, but both times membership was rejected in a referendum.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-07-12 |title=Historical overview |url=https://www.norway.no/en/missions/eu/areas-of-cooperation/historical-overview/ |access-date=2023-05-24 |website=www.norway.no |language=en}}</ref> The application remains frozen.{{citation needed|date=September 2023}} | |||
* ] applied for membership in 1992 but subsequently froze its application.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/eu-membership-application-not-to-be-withdrawn/4811170|title=EU membership application not to be withdrawn|date=26 October 2005|publisher=]|access-date=2016-04-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=British ], ] |title=EU and Switzerland |date=4 July 2006 |work=The UK & Switzerland |url=http://www.britishembassy.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/ShowPage&c=Page&cid=1085326325096 |access-date=2006-07-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060428003205/http://www.britishembassy.gov.uk/servlet/Front?pagename=OpenMarket%2FXcelerate%2FShowPage&c=Page&cid=1085326325096 |archive-date=28 April 2006}}</ref> It formally withdrew it in 2016.<ref name=Reimann/><ref name="Swiss Federal Council"/> | |||
* ] applied in 2009 following an ], but formally withdrew in 2013 after the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Iceland |url=https://consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/enlargement/iceland/ |access-date=2023-05-24 |website=www.consilium.europa.eu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |agency=AFP |date=2015-03-12 |title=Iceland drops EU membership bid: 'interests better served outside' union |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |issn=0261-3077 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/12/iceland-drops-european-union-membership-bid |access-date=2023-05-24}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | |||
{{portal|European Union| Europe}} | |||
{{div col|colwidth=15em}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
== Notes== | |||
{{notelist}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist| |
{{reflist|30em}} | ||
==External links== | == External links == | ||
{{Commons}} | |||
{{commonscat|Enlargement of the European Union}} | |||
* – ] | * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160715173032/http://europa.eu/pol/enlarg/index_en.htm |date=15 July 2016 }} – ] | ||
* | |||
* – ] | |||
* – ] | |||
* Archival material concerning the enlargement of the European Union can be consulted at the in Florence | |||
{{ |
{{European Union candidates}} | ||
{{European Union topics|state=collapsed}} | {{European Union topics|state=collapsed}} | ||
{{Territorial evolution of the world}} | |||
{{Reach of the European Union|state=collapsed}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 11:44, 20 December 2024
Accession of new countries to the EU
The European Union (EU) has expanded a number of times throughout its history by way of the accession of new member states to the Union. To join the EU, a state needs to fulfil economic and political conditions called the Copenhagen criteria (named after the Copenhagen summit in June 1993), which require a stable democratic government that respects the rule of law, and its corresponding freedoms and institutions. According to the Maastricht Treaty, each current member state and the European Parliament must agree to any enlargement. The process of enlargement is sometimes referred to as European integration. This term is also used to refer to the intensification of co-operation between EU member states as national governments allow for the gradual harmonisation of national laws.
The EU's predecessor, the European Economic Community, was founded with the Inner Six member states in 1958, when the Treaty of Rome came into force. Since then, the EU's membership has grown to twenty-seven, with the latest member state being Croatia, which joined in July 2013. The most recent territorial enlargement of the EU was the incorporation of Mayotte in 2014. Campione d'Italia joined the EU Customs Union in 2020. The most notable territorial reductions of the EU, and its predecessors, have been the exit of Algeria upon independence in 1962, the exit of Greenland in 1985, and the withdrawal of the United Kingdom in 2020.
Accession negotiations are currently ongoing with Montenegro (since 2012), Serbia (since 2014), Albania (since 2020), North Macedonia (since 2020), Moldova (since 2024), and Ukraine (since 2024). Negotiations with Turkey were opened in October 2005, but have been effectively frozen by the EU since December 2016, due to backsliding in the areas of democracy, rule of law, and fundamental rights.
Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia were granted official candidate status respectively in December 2022 and December 2023, but were asked to complete additional reforms before qualifying for the formal start of membership negotiations. Kosovo submitted an application for membership in December 2022. For Kosovo to be granted official candidate status, the Council will need to unanimously agree to start Kosovo's accession process by requesting an opinion from the European Commission on its application. The EU however remains divided on its policy towards Kosovo, with five EU member states not recognising its independence.
Criteria
Further information: Copenhagen criteriaAccording to the EU treaties, membership of the European Union is open to "any European State which respects the values referred to in Article 2 and is committed to promoting them" (TEU Article 49). Those Article 2 values are "respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities." This is based on the 1993 "Copenhagen criteria" agreed as it became clear many former Eastern Bloc countries would apply to join:
Membership requires that candidate country has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights, respect for and protection of minorities, the existence of a functioning market economy as well as the capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union. Membership presupposes the candidate's ability to take on the obligations of membership including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary union.
— Excerpt from the Copenhagen Presidency conclusions
In December 1995, the Madrid European Council revised the membership criteria to include conditions for member country integration through the appropriate adjustment of its administrative structures: since it is important that European Community legislation be reflected in national legislation, it is critical that the revised national legislation be implemented effectively through appropriate administrative and judicial structures.
Finally, and technically outside the Copenhagen criteria, comes the further requirement that all prospective members must enact legislation to bring their laws into line with the body of European law built up over the history of the Union, known as the acquis communautaire.
Process
Today the accession process follows a series of formal steps, from a pre-accession agreement to the ratification of the final accession treaty. These steps are primarily presided over by the European Commission (Enlargement Commissioner and DG Enlargement), but the actual negotiations are technically conducted between the Union's Member States and the candidate country.
Before a country applies for membership it typically signs an association agreement to help prepare the country for candidacy and eventual membership. Most countries do not meet the criteria to even begin negotiations before they apply, so they need many years to prepare for the process. An association agreement helps prepare for this first step.
In the case of the Western Balkans, a special process, the Stabilisation and Association Process exists to deal with the special circumstances there.
When a country formally applies for membership, the Council asks the commission to prepare an opinion on the country's readiness to begin negotiations. The council can then either accept or reject the commission's opinion (The council has only once rejected the commission's opinion when the latter advised against opening negotiations with Greece).
If the Council agrees to open negotiations the screening process then begins. The commission and candidate country examine its laws and those of the EU and determine what differences exist. The Council then recommends opening negotiations on "chapters" of law that it feels there is sufficient common ground to have constructive negotiations. Negotiations are typically a matter of the candidate country convincing the EU that its laws and administrative capacity are sufficient to execute European law, which can be implemented as seen fit by the member states. Often this will involve time-lines before the Acquis Communautaire (European regulations, directives and standards) has to be fully implemented.
A chapter is said to be closed when both sides have agreed it has been implemented sufficiently, however it can still be re-opened if the Commission feels that the candidate has fallen out of compliance.
To assess progress achieved by countries in preparing for accession to the European Union, the European Commission submits regular reports (yearly) to the European Council. These serve as a basis for the council to make decisions on negotiations or their extension to other candidates.
Once the negotiations are complete, a Treaty of Accession will be signed, which must then be ratified by all of the member states of the Union, as well as the institutions of the Union, and the candidate country. Once this has been completed it will join the Union on the date specified in the treaty.
The entire process, from application for membership to membership has typically taken about a decade, although some countries, notably Sweden, Finland, and Austria have been faster, taking only a few years. The process from application for association agreement through accession has taken far longer, as much as several decades (Turkey, for example, first applied for association in the 1950s and has yet to conclude accession negotiations).
On 18 October 2019, France vetoed starting of negotiations with Albania and North Macedonia, citing problems with the current enlargement process. In November 2019, France proposed a seven-stage accession plan for membership. The reformed accession strategy proposes participation in different programs, such as Erasmus, Banking Union, Capital Markets Union, Customs Union, etc.
Example
The following is an example of the accession process—Estonia's path to membership from its restoration of independence from the Soviet Union in November 1991 with recognition from the EU the same month to membership in May 2004. Ease of accession depends on the state: how integrated it is with the EU beforehand, the state of its economy and public institutions, any outstanding political issues with the EU and (historically) how much law to date the EU has built up that the acceding state must adopt. This outline also includes integration steps taken by the accession country after it attains membership.
Year | Date | Event | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1991 | 20 August | Restoration of independence from USSR | Recognition from EU in same month. |
1994 | 18 July | Free trade agreement concluded | |
1995 | 1 January | Free trade agreement in force | |
12 June | Europe Agreement concluded | ||
24 November | Applied for Membership | ||
1998 | 1 January | Europe Agreement comes into force | Aiding pre-integration |
March | Membership negotiations open | 6 chapters opened | |
1999 | 17 chapters opened | ||
2000 | 6 chapters opened | ||
2002 | December | All chapters closed and negotiations concluded | Final chapter (No. 30) was opened and closed at the same time. |
2003 | 8 April | Draft accession treaty approved by Estonian government | |
16 April | Treaty of Accession signed | ||
14 September | Referendum on membership approved | 66.84% in favour, turnout : 64.02% | |
2004 | 1 May | Acceded to EU | |
28 June | Joined ERM | Requires 2 years in ERM before euro adoption | |
2007 | 21 December | Entered the Schengen area | |
2011 | 1 January | Adoption of the euro | |
1 May | Right to limit migration from 2004 countries expired | Only Austria and Germany applied this, the rest of EU countries abolished restrictions before 2011 |
Success and fatigue
Enlargement has been one of the EU's successful foreign policies, yet has equally suffered from considerable opposition from the start. French President Charles de Gaulle opposed British membership. A later French President, François Mitterrand, opposed Greek, Spanish and Portuguese membership, fearing that the former dictatorships were not ready and that the countries' inclusion would reduce the union to a free-trade area.
The reasons for the first member states to apply, and for them to be accepted, were primarily economic while the second enlargement was more political. The southern Mediterranean countries had just emerged from dictatorships and wanted to secure their democratic systems through the EEC, while the EEC wanted to ensure the same thing and that their southern neighbours were stable and aligned to NATO. These two principal forces, economic gain and political security, have been behind enlargements since. After the large enlargements in 2004, public opinion in Europe turned against further expansion.
It has also been acknowledged that enlargement has its limits; the EU cannot expand endlessly. Former Commission President Romano Prodi favoured granting "everything but institutions" to the EU's neighbour states, allowing them to co-operate deeply while not adding strain on the EU's institutional framework. This has in particular been pushed by France and Germany as a privileged partnership for Turkey, membership for which has faced considerable opposition on cultural and logistical grounds.
Historical enlargements
See also: History of the European Union and Statistics relating to enlargement of the European UnionApplicant | Submitted | Accession / failure rationale |
---|---|---|
Albania | 28 April 2009 | ANegotiating |
Austria | 17 July 1989 | 1 January 1995 |
Belgium | 23 July 1952Founder | 23 July 1952 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 15 February 2016 | B Candidate |
Bulgaria | 14 December 1995 | 1 January 2007 |
Croatia | 21 February 2003 | 1 July 2013 |
Cyprus | 3 July 1990 | 1 May 2004 |
Czech Republic | 17 January 1996 | 1 May 2004 |
Denmark | 10 August 1961 | 1963Withdrawn |
11 May 1967 | 1 January 1973 | |
Estonia | 24 November 1995 | 1 May 2004 |
Finland | 18 March 1992 | 1 January 1995 |
France | 23 July 1952Founder | 23 July 1952 |
Georgia | 3 March 2022 | BCandidate |
West Germany | 23 July 1952Founder | 23 July 1952 |
Greece | 12 June 1975 | 1 January 1981 |
Hungary | 31 March 1994 | 1 May 2004 |
Iceland | 17 July 2009 | 13 September 2013 Withdrawn |
Ireland | 31 July 1961 | 1963Withdrawn |
11 May 1967 | 1 January 1973 | |
Italy | 23 July 1952Founder | 23 July 1952 |
Kosovo | 14 December 2022 | CApplicant |
Latvia | 13 September 1995 | 1 May 2004 |
Lithuania | 8 December 1995 | 1 May 2004 |
Luxembourg | 23 July 1952Founder | 23 July 1952 |
Malta | 16 July 1990 | October 1996 Frozen |
1 May 2004 | ||
Moldova | 3 March 2022 | ANegotiating |
Montenegro | 15 December 2008 | ANegotiating |
Morocco | 20 July 1987 | 20 July 1987 Rejected |
Netherlands | 23 July 1952Founder | 23 July 1952 |
North Macedonia | 22 March 2004 | ANegotiating |
Norway | 30 April 1962 | 1963Withdrawn |
21 July 1967 | 1972 Withdrawn | |
25 November 1992 | 1994 Withdrawn | |
Poland | 5 April 1994 | 1 May 2004 |
Portugal | 28 March 1977 | 1 January 1986 |
Romania | 22 June 1995 | 1 January 2007 |
Serbia | 22 December 2009 | ANegotiating |
Slovakia | 27 June 1995 | 1 May 2004 |
Slovenia | 10 June 1996 | 1 May 2004 |
Spain | 9 February 1962 | 1964 Rejected |
28 June 1977 | 1 January 1986 | |
Sweden | 1 July 1991 | 1 January 1995 |
Switzerland | 25 May 1992 | 2016 Withdrawn |
Turkey | 14 April 1987 | EFrozen negotiations |
Ukraine | 28 February 2022 | ANegotiating |
United Kingdom | 10 August 1961 | 1963Vetoed |
10 May 1967 | 1 January 1973 |
Notes:
- Due to veto of UK application.
- On 3 October 1990, East Germany joined West Germany through the process of German reunification; since then, the reunited Germany has been a single member state.
- Due to the election of new government.
- Due to veto of UK application.
- Due to election of new government in October 1996. Resumed following another election of a new government in September 1998.
- ^ By the European Council.
- Referred to as "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia" by the EU before 2019.
- Due to veto of UK application.
- By Norway after a 1972 referendum.
- By Norway after a 1994 referendum.
- Due to public opinion.
- By France.
Membership of EU predecessors
The European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) was proposed by Robert Schuman in his declaration on 9 May 1950 and involved the pooling of the coal and steel industries of France and West Germany. Half of the project states, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands, had already achieved a great degree of integration amongst themselves with the organs of Benelux and earlier bilateral agreements. These five countries were joined by Italy and they all signed the Treaty of Paris on 23 July 1952. These six members, dubbed the 'Inner Six' (as opposed to the 'outer seven' who formed the European Free Trade Association who were suspicious of such plans for integration) went on to sign the Treaties of Rome establishing two further communities, together known as the European Communities when they merged their executives in 1967.
In 1962, Spain, ruled by the military dictator Francisco Franco, issued its first attempt to join the European Communities. Spanish Foreign Affairs minister Fernando María Castiella sent the request form to French Prime Minister Maurice Couve de Murville. This request was rejected by all the member countries in 1964; Spain was not a democracy at the time, and thus unable to enter the EEC.
The Community did see some loss of territory due to the decolonialisation occurring in their era. Algeria, which was an integral part of France, had a special relationship with the Community. Algeria gained independence on 5 July 1962 and hence left the Community. There would be no further efforts at enlargement until the early 1970s.
Enlargement of the European Communities
Main article: 1973 enlargement of the European CommunitiesThe United Kingdom, which had refused to join as a founding member, changed its policy following the Suez crisis and applied to be a member of the Communities. Other EEC members were also inclined to British membership on those grounds. French President Charles de Gaulle vetoed British membership.
Once de Gaulle had left office, the door to enlargement was once again opened. The EEC economy had also slowed down and British membership was seen as a way to revitalise the community. Only after a 12-hour talk between British Prime Minister Edward Heath and French President Georges Pompidou took place did Britain's third application succeed. After Britain was accepted Prime Minister Edward Heath said:
For my part, I have no doubt at all that the discussions which we have had will prove of real and lasting benefit, not only to Britain and France, but to Europe as a whole.
As part of the deal for British entry, France agreed to allow the EEC its own monetary resources. However France made that concession only as Britain's small agriculture sector would ensure that Britain would be a net contributor to the Common Agricultural Policy dominated EEC budget. Applying together with the UK, as on the previous occasions, were Denmark, Ireland, and Norway. These countries were so economically linked to the UK that they considered it necessary to join the EEC if the UK did. However the Norwegian government lost a national referendum on membership and hence did not accede with the others on 1 January 1973. Gibraltar joined the Community with the United Kingdom at this point, as can be seen in the long title of the UK European Communities Act 1972.
Mediterranean enlargements
Further information: 1981 enlargement of the European Communities, 1986 enlargement of the European Communities, and Accession Treaty of Spain to the European Economic CommunityThe next enlargement would occur for different reasons. The 1970s also saw Greece, Spain, and Portugal emerge from dictatorship. These countries desired to consolidate their new democratic systems by binding themselves into the EEC. Equally, the EEC was unsure about which way these countries were heading and wanted to ensure stability along its southern borders. However François Mitterrand initially opposed their membership fearing they were not ready and it would water the community down to a free trade area.
Greece joined the EEC in 1981 followed by Spain and Portugal in 1986. None of these nations had a referendum related to accession.
The year 1985, however, saw the first time a territory voted to leave the Community, when Greenland was granted home rule by Denmark and the territory used its new powers and voted to withdraw from the Community (see member state territories).
Morocco and Turkey applied for membership in 1987. Morocco's application was turned down as it was not considered European; Turkey's application was considered eligible on the basis of the 1963 Ankara Association Agreement but the opinion of the Commission on the possible candidate status was by then negative. Turkey received candidate status in 1999 and began full membership negotiations in 2005, which were still in progress as of 2021.
Post–Cold War
Main article: 1995 enlargement of the European UnionAfter the 1970s, Europe experienced an economic downturn which led to leaders launching of the Single European Act which set to create a single market by 1992. The effect of this was that EFTA states found it harder to export to the EEC and businesses (including large EFTA corporations such as Volvo) wished to relocate within the new single market making the downturn worse for EFTA. EFTA states began to discuss closer links with the EEC despite its domestic unpopularity.
Austria, Finland, and Sweden were neutral in the Cold War so membership of an organisation developing a common foreign and security policy would be incompatible with that. With the end of the Cold War in 1989, that obstacle was removed, and the desire to pursue membership grew stronger. On 3 October 1990, the reunification of East and West Germany brought East Germany into the Community without increasing the number of member states.
The Community later became the European Union in 1993 by virtue of the Maastricht Treaty, and established standards for new entrants so their suitability could be judged. The Copenhagen criteria stated in 1993 that a country must be a democracy, operate a free market, and be willing to adopt the entire body of EU law already agreed upon. Also in 1993 the European Economic Area was established with the EFTA states except Switzerland. Most of the new EEA states pursued full EU membership as the EEA did not sufficiently satisfy the needs of their export based corporations. The EU has also preferred these states to integrate via the EEA rather than full membership as the EEC wished to pursue monetary integration and did not wish for another round of enlargement to occupy their attention. However, with the EEA's credibility dented following rejection by businesses and Switzerland, the EU agreed with full membership. This was more readily accepted with the prospect of poorer countries wishing to join; contributions from richer countries would help balance the EU budget. On 1 January 1995 Austria, Finland, and Sweden acceded to the EU marking its fourth enlargement. The Norwegian government lost a second national referendum on membership.
Eastern enlargement
Further information: 2004 enlargement of the European Union and 2007 enlargement of the European UnionIn the late 1980s (shortly prior to the dissolution of the Soviet Union) Mikhail Gorbachev announced the Soviet Union would no longer intervene in other countries' internal affairs (Sinatra Doctrine), practically freeing Central and Eastern Europe from Soviet occupation (Czechoslovakia and Hungary) / Soviet backed authoritarian regimes. These countries wanted to consolidate their democracies through joining Western world international organisations (including participation in European integration) which would ensure the newly emerged democracies would not fall back under Russian control. The EU and NATO offered a guarantee of this, and the EU was also seen as vital to ensuring the economic success of those countries. However, the EU's desire to accept these countries' membership applications was less than rapid. The collapse of communism came quickly and was not anticipated. The EU struggled to deal with the sudden reunification of Germany with the addition of its poorer 17 million people and, while keeping its monetary union project on track, it was still at that early stage pointing the EFTA countries in the direction of the EEA rather than full membership.
States in Central and Eastern Europe persisted and eventually the above-mentioned issues were cleared. The US also pressured the EU to offer membership as a temporary guarantee; it feared expanding NATO too rapidly for fear of frightening Russia. Although eventually trying to limit the number of members, and after encouragement from the US, the EU pursued talks with ten countries and a change of mind by Cyprus and Malta helped to offset slightly the influx of large poorer member states from Central and Eastern Europe.
Country |
Europe Association Agreement |
Start of accession negotiations |
Population in 1998 |
1998 GDP ($ billions) |
1998 GDP (PPP) per capita |
Real GDP in 1998 |
Real wage in 1998 |
Real gross industrial output |
Private sector share of GDP in 1998 |
Asset share of state-owned banks in 1998 |
External debt in 1998 |
General government debt in 1998 |
Net inflows of FDI in 1998 (% of GDP) |
General government balance in 1998 |
Freedom House's Nations in Transit score in 1998 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bulgaria | 1993-03-03 | 2000-02-15 | 8.34 | 12.7 | $4,776 €4,583 |
67.3 | 47.0 | 44.3 | 65% | 59.5% | 80.6 | 95.6 | 4 | 2 | 30 |
Czech Republic | 1993-10-04 | 1998-03-31 | 10.28 | 60.8 | $12,479 €12,045 |
95.45 | 101.0 | 79.4 | 75% | 18.8% | 40.0 | 13.2 | 6 | −4 | 14 |
Estonia | 1995-06-13 | 1998-03-31 | 1.43 | 5.65 | $7,607 €7,491 |
79.95 | 74.3 | 59.0 | 70% | 7.8% | 52.5 | 6.0 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
Hungary | 1991-12-16 | 1998-03-31 | 10.12 | 46.9 | $10,202 €9,735 |
95.3 | 79.6 | 103.0 | 80% | 11.8% | 58.0 | 61.9 | 4 | −8 | 13 |
Latvia | 1995-06-13 | 2000-02-15 | 2.42 | 6.6 | $5,557 €5,465 |
59.4 | 63.0 | 47.9 | 65% | 8.5% | 46.8 | 10.6 | 6 | −1 | 18 |
Lithuania | 1995-06-13 | 2000-02-15 | 3.69 | 11 | $6,437 €6,124 |
65.6 | 44.6 | 40.6 | 70% | 45.3% | 34.2 | 16.5 | 8 | −3 | 18 |
Poland | 1991-12-16 | 1998-03-31 | 38.72 | 158.5 | $7,658 €7,756 |
117.2 | 85.2 | 117.3 | 65% | 48% | 37.3 | 39.9 | 4 | −4 | 13 |
Romania | 1993-02-01 | 2000-02-15 | 22.47 | 42.1 | $5,646 €5,576 |
78.1 | 61.1 | 42.5 | 60% | 74.6% | 23.6 | 27.6 | 5 | −4 | 33 |
Slovakia | 1993-10-04 | 2000-02-15 | 5.38 | 22.2 | $9,817 €9,615 |
99.8 | 88.8 | 80.9 | 75% | 50% | 53.7 | 28.6 | 3 | −5 | 29 |
Slovenia | 1996-06-10 | 1998-03-31 | 1.99 | 21.1 | $14,305 €13,589 |
102.25 | 86.7 | 75.9 | 60% | 41.3% | 34.7 | 22.2 | 1 | −2 | 16 |
Notes:
- 1998 GDP per capita multiplied by 1998 population
- the average between the EIU estimate (used by the OECD) and the UNECE estimate (used by the Council of Europe)
- The Nations in Transit score comprises 8 categories: political process, civil society, independent media, governance and public administration, rule of law, privatization, macroeconomics and microeconomics. Each category is assigned a score from 1 (highest) to 7 (lowest). Thus, the greater the final score (8 to 56), the more authoritarian the country. In 1998, the most authoritarian of the 10 EU candidates was Romania: with a score of 33, Romania was even more authoritarian than Russia (32).
In the end, eight Central and Eastern European countries (the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia), plus two Mediterranean countries (Malta and Cyprus), joined on 1 May 2004. This was the largest single enlargement in terms of people, and number of countries, though not in terms of GDP. The less developed nature of these countries was of concern to some of the older member states. Some countries, such as the UK, immediately opened their job market to the accession states, whereas most others placed temporary restrictions on the rights of work of the citizens of these states to their countries. The movement westward of some of the labour force of the newly acceded countries that occurred in the aftermath of the enlargement initially spawned clichés among the public opinion and media of some western countries (such as the "Polish plumber"), despite the generally conceded benefit to the economies concerned. The official EU media (the speeches of the European Commission) frequently referred to the enlargement to the CEE region as "an historical opportunity" and "morally imperative", which reflected the desire of the EU to admit these countries as members, even though they were less developed than the Western European countries.
Following this, Romania and Bulgaria, deemed as not fully ready by the commission to join in 2004, acceded instead on 1 January 2007. These, like the countries joining in 2004, faced a series of restrictions as to their citizens not fully enjoying working rights on the territory of some of the older EU members until 2014. Romania and Bulgaria did not have a referendum related to accession.
The socio-economic research on the attitudes towards the integration from both hosting and visiting countries has revealed divergent views. The analysis shows, there are a number of possible factors of the rationalisation and understanding of the practices on what the enlargement has been and should be like. Attitudes of even sceptical citizens, do not discard the possibility on future sustainable enlargements. The years subsequent to the EU accession will lead to extensive dialogues between policy-makers, governments, and European citizens about the path for a constructive development.
Western Balkans enlargements
Further information: 2013 enlargement of the European UnionThe 2003 European Council summit in Thessaloniki set integration of the Western Balkans as a priority of EU expansion. The EU's relations with the Western Balkans states were moved from the "External Relations" to the "Enlargement" policy segment in 2005. Those states which have not been recognised as candidate countries are considered "potential candidate countries". The move to Enlargement directorate was a consequence of the advancement of the Stabilisation and Association process.
Croatia joined on 1 July 2013, following ratification of the 2011 Accession Treaty by all other EU countries. Albania and the several successor states of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia have all adopted EU integration as an aim of foreign policy.
Detail
# | Official name | Date | Community countries and OMR | Associated territories | Excluded territories |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ECSC Foundation | 23 July 1952 | Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, France, Saarland, Italy, West Germany, West Berlin | Belgian Congo, Ruanda-Urundi, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, French Tunisia, French Morocco, Adélie Land, Comoro Islands, Chad, Gabon, Middle Congo, Ubangi-Shari, French India, French Oceania, Clipperton Island, French Somaliland, Dahomey, French Guinea, French Sudan, Ivory Coast, Mauritania, Niger, Senegal, Upper Volta, French Cameroons, French Togoland, Madagascar, Crozet Islands, Kerguelen Islands, Saint-Paul-and-Amsterdam Islands, New Caledonia, Wallis-et-Futuna, French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Réunion, French Algeria, Saint Pierre and Miquelon, Scattered Islands in the Indian Ocean, French-administration of the New Hebrides, Italian Somaliland, Netherlands New Guinea, Surinam, Netherlands Antilles | |
1953–1957 | the above, Saarland joined West Germany | the above without the newly independent: Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, French Tunisia, French Morocco, French India; and without Adélie Land, Crozet Islands, Kerguelen Islands, Saint-Paul-and-Amsterdam Islands | |||
2 | EEC and EURATOM Foundation | 1 January 1958 | the above, French Algeria, Réunion, French Guiana, Martinique, Guadeloupe | French Guinea, French Cameroons, French Togoland, French Sudan, Senegal, Madagascar, Belgian Congo, Italian Somaliland, Dahomey, Niger, Upper Volta, Ivory Coast, Chad, Ubangi-Shari, Middle Congo, Gabon, Mauritania, Ruanda-Urundi, Netherlands New Guinea, Comoro Islands, French Somaliland, French-administration of the New Hebrides, St. Pierre and Miquelon, Wallis and Futuna, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, French Southern and Antarctic Lands, Scattered islands in the Indian Ocean | the above, West Berlin, without Scattered islands in the Indian Ocean |
1958–1962 | the above | the above, without the newly independent: French Guinea, French Cameroons, Togo, Mali Federation, Malagasy Republic, Belgian Congo, Italian Somaliland, Dahomey, Niger, Upper Volta, Ivory Coast, Chad, Central African Republic, Congo, Gabon, Mauritania, Ruanda-Urundi, Netherlands New Guinea | the above | ||
3 July 1962 | the above, without the newly independent: Algeria | the above | the above | ||
1 September 1962 | the above | the above, with Surinam | the above, without Surinam | ||
Netherlands Antilles Association Convention | 1 October 1964 | the above | the above, with the Netherlands Antilles | the above, without the Netherlands Antilles | |
3 | First Enlargement | 1 January 1973 | the above, Republic of Ireland, United Kingdom, Gibraltar, Denmark | the above, Antigua, Redonda, Dominica, Grenada, St. Christopher-Nevis-Anguilla, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Brunei, Canton and Enderbury Islands, Bahama Islands, Bermuda, British Antarctic Territory, British Honduras, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, British Western Pacific Territories, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Falkland Islands Dependencies, Gilbert and Ellice Islands, Montserrat, Pitcairn Islands, St. Helena, Ascension Island, Tristan da Cunha, Seychelles, New Hebrides, Turks and Caicos Islands | the above, the Faroe Islands, Akrotiri and Dhekelia, the Isle of Man, Jersey, Guernsey, Alderney, Sark, Rhodesia, Hong Kong |
1973–1980 | the above | the above, Barbuda, Mayotte, without the newly independent Bahama Islands, Grenada, St. Vincent, Seychelles, British Solomon Islands, Surinam, Ellice Island, Dominica, St. Lucia, Gilbert Islands, New Hebrides, Comoro Islands and French Territory of the Afars and the Issas | the above without the newly independent Rhodesia | ||
4 | Second Enlargement | 1 January 1981 | the above, Greece | the above | the above |
1981–1984 | the above | the above, Anguilla, without the newly independent Belize, Antigua, Barbuda, Redonda, St. Christopher and Nevis and Brunei | the above | ||
1 January 1985 | the above without Greenland | the above, Greenland | the above | ||
5 | Third Enlargement | 1 January 1986 | the above, Spain, Portugal, Azores, Madeira, Plazas de soberanía, Canary Islands | the above, with Aruba, formerly part of the Netherlands Antilles | the above, Macau, East Timor |
German reunification | 3 October 1990 | the above, East Germany and West Berlin join to form Germany | the above | the above without West Berlin | |
6 | Fourth Enlargement | 1 January 1995 | the above, Austria, Sweden, Finland | the above | the above |
1 July 1997 | the above | the above | the above, without Hong Kong | ||
20 December 1999 | the above | the above | the above, without Macau | ||
20 May 2002 | the above | the above | the above, without the newly independent East Timor | ||
7 | Fifth Enlargement | 1 May 2004 | the above, Malta, Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Slovenia, Hungary | the above, Akrotiri and Dhekelia | the above, without Akrotiri and Dhekelia |
8 | Sixth Enlargement | 1 January 2007 | the above, Bulgaria, Romania | the above | the above |
22 February 2007 | the above, Collectivity of Saint Martin, Saint Barthélemy | the above, without Scattered islands in the Indian Ocean | the above | ||
10 October 2010 | the above | the above, without the now-dissolved Netherlands Antilles, with Curaçao, Sint Maarten, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, Saba | the above | ||
1 January 2012 | the above, without Saint Barthélemy | the above, Saint Barthélemy | the above | ||
9 | Seventh Enlargement |
1 July 2013 | the above, Croatia | the above | the above |
10 | 1 January 2014 | the above, Mayotte | the above, without Mayotte | the above | |
11 | Withdrawal of the United Kingdom | Transition period: 1 February 2020 to 31 December 2020 | the above, without United Kingdom, Gibraltar | the above without Akrotiri and Dhekelia, Anguilla, Bermuda, British Antarctic Territory, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Montserrat, Pitcairn, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, and Turks and Caicos Islands | the above without the Isle of Man, Jersey, Guernsey |
Notes:
- Until the reunification of Germany in 1990 the de jure status of West Berlin was that of French, UK and US occupied zones with West German civilian administration. The treaties applied fully during 1952–1990 over the West German and French responsibilities, and during 1973–1990 over the UK responsibilities. From 3 October 1990 West Berlin was fully integrated in the Federal Republic of Germany along with East Germany.
- Renamed French Polynesia on 1957-07-22
- ^ The New Hebrides was a condominium between the United Kingdom and France until its independence in 1980, and was generally considered to be an overseas territory of both countries
- Became part of India on 1954-07-21
- Adélie Land, Crozet Islands, Kerguelen Islands and Saint-Paul-and-Amsterdam Islands merged to become the French Southern and Antarctic Lands on 1955-08-06. All territories were already outside the ECSC and the merged territory retained the same status
- Renamed Togo on 1958-02-22
- Renamed Sudanese Republic on 1958-11-24
- ^ Senegal and the Sudanese Republic merged on 1959-04-04 to create the Mali Federation
- Renamed Malagasy Republic on 1958-10-14
- Renamed Congo on 1958-11-28
- Renamed French Territory of the Afars and the Issas in 1967
- Became independent as the Kingdom of Ruanda and the Kingdom of Burundi
- Annexed by Indonesia in 1962
- Including the County of Greenland, which later gained home rule and left the EC
- The UK co-administered the condominium of the Canton and Enderbury Islands with the US, until the UK merged it with its Gilbert and Ellice Islands colony on 1975-01-01 to create its Gilbert Islands colony. As such it ceased to be a condominium, but the US continued to claim it until 1979
- Renamed Belize on 1973-06-01
- Renamed the British Solomon Islands on 1976-01-02
- Renamed South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands in 1985
- Split into the Gilbert Islands (which was merged with the Canton and Enderbury Islands) and Ellice Island on 1975-01-01
- British Sovereign Base Areas on the island of Cyprus
- Legally a British colony until independence in 1980
- The island of Barbuda became a separate territory from Antigua on 1976-12-23
- ^ The island of Mayotte became a separate territory in 1974, and chose to remain with France, rather than become independent
- ^ Anguilla stayed a British colony, while Saint Christopher and Nevis became independent as St. Kitts and Nevis
- Antigua, Barbuda and Redonda merged to become independent as Antigua and Barbuda
- Although Aruba was only added to the OCT list with the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam in 1999, it was considered an OCT by the European Communities since leaving the Netherlands Antilles: "De eilandgebieden zullen dus de rechten en plichten van de LGO-status van het Land de Nederlandse Antillen overnemen, wanneer dat opgeheven wordt. Hetzelfde gebeurde in 1986 toen Aruba van eilandgebied van de Nederlandse Antillen een apart Land binnen het Koninkrijk werd. Hoewel de LGO-bijlage pas in 1999 aan deze situatie werd aangepast, heeft de Europese Gemeenschap Aruba van het begin af aan als LGO behandeld." in: Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- ^ The Netherlands Antilles dissolved on 10 October 2010 and contained the islands of Aruba (which left the Netherlands Antilles in 1986), Bonaire, Curacao, Sint Maarten, Saba and Sint Eustatius. Aruba, Curacao and Sint Maarten are autonomous countries in the Kingdom of Netherlands, and remain overseas territories of the European Union. Bonaire, St Eustatius and Saba, also known as the BES islands, are special municipalities of the Netherlands, and remained legally overseas territories
- De jure a Portuguese colony under Indonesian occupation until 1999
- ^ Transferred to China
- Saint Martin and Saint Barthélemy were part of Guadeloupe and thus already part of the EU. On 2007-02-22, they became separate territories but France retained application of EU law there, and their EU OMR status was confirmed in the Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 2009-01-01.
- The Scattered islands in the Indian Ocean became part of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands on 2007-02-22. Both territories were already EU OCTs and the merged territory retained the same status.
Timeline
Potential enlargements
Main article: Potential enlargement of the European UnionCurrent enlargement agenda
Article 49 of the Maastricht Treaty (as amended) says that any European state that respects the "principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law", may apply to join the Union. The European Council set out the conditions for EU membership in June 1993 in the so-called Copenhagen criteria (see Criteria above for details). The Western Balkan states had to sign Stabilisation and Association Agreements (SAAs) before applying for membership, but have been prioritised with an open path to apply for membership and roadmap for an accession perspective, since emerging from the break-up of Yugoslavia in the early 1990s and subsequent Yugoslav Wars.
Accession negotiations are currently ongoing with Montenegro (since 2012), Serbia (since 2014), Albania (since 2020), North Macedonia (since 2020), Moldova (since 2024) and Ukraine (since 2024). Negotiations with Turkey were opened in October 2005, but have been effectively frozen by the EU since December 2016, due to backsliding in the areas of democracy, rule of law, and fundamental rights.
The most advanced stage of the negotiations, defined as meeting the interim benchmarks for negotiation chapter 23 and 24 which allow the closing process of all negotiation chapters to start, has so far only been reached by Montenegro. Montenegro's declared political goal is to achieve membership of the EU by 2028.
Bosnia and Herzegovina and Georgia were granted official candidate status respectively in December 2022 and December 2023, but were asked to complete additional reforms before qualifying for the formal start of membership negotiations. Kosovo submitted an application for membership in December 2022. For Kosovo to be granted official candidate status, the Council will need to unanimously agree to start Kosovo's accession process by requesting an opinion from the European Commission on its application. The EU however remains divided on its policy towards Kosovo, with five EU member states not recognising its independence.
EU enlargement policy
On 6 February 2018, the European Commission published its expansion plan, which covers the six Western Balkan countries. The plan envisages that all six applicants could achieve accession as members of the European Union after 2025. In May 2018, Bulgaria—holding the rotating presidency of the Council of the European Union—hosted a summit on the Western Balkans, which aimed to facilitate accession by the six, including enhanced regional security cooperation and regional connectivity.
It was noteworthy that the Summit referred to "partners" rather than states: this reflects that Kosovo is only partially recognised as a state. As of 2018, Kosovo was not recognised by fellow Western Balkan applicant Serbia and existing EU members Spain, Slovakia, Cyprus, Romania, and Greece. The European Commission is sensitive to the issue, which was addressed in a speech by the EU's High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the European Parliament Plenary Session on the Western Balkan Strategy: "shared, unequivocal, concrete perspective for European Union integration for each and every one of the six partners. Each at its own pace, with its own specificities and under different conditions, but the direction is clear and is one."
Amid the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the three former Soviet republics of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia submitted applications for EU membership. The European Parliament subsequently voted to accept an emergency petition from the government of Ukraine for EU member state candidacy. On 17 June 2022, the European Commission recommended that Ukraine and Moldova become candidates for EU membership and that Georgia be recognised as a potential candidate but that it would need to "meet certain conditions" to be granted candidate status. These conditions included investing more in education and infrastructure and completing several reforms in elections, judicial independence, crime, corruption, and oligarchs. These recommendations were approved by the European Council during a summit on 23 June.
On 14 December 2023, the European Council granted candidate status to Georgia, agreed to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova, and announced that the opening of accession negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina would be reconsidered once certain conditions were met with an update expected in March 2024. On 9 July 2024 the European Union halted Georgia's accession into the European union after their authorities adopted a new "foreign influence" law which some fear might curb democratic freedom.
Further information: Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the European Union, Accession of Ukraine to the European Union, Accession of Moldova to the European Union, Accession of Georgia to the European Union, and Accession of Kosovo to the European UnionPotential enlargement agenda
On 5 March 2024, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that Armenia would apply for EU candidacy by Autumn 2024 at the latest. On 12 March 2024, the European Parliament passed a resolution confirming Armenia meets Maastricht Treaty Article 49 requirements and that the country may apply for EU membership.
Further information: Armenia–European Union relationsAbandoned enlargement negotiations
Several sovereign states have previously submitted applications for membership to the EU but are no longer on the agenda:
- Norway has completed membership negotiations twice, in 1972 and 1994, but both times membership was rejected in a referendum. The application remains frozen.
- Switzerland applied for membership in 1992 but subsequently froze its application. It formally withdrew it in 2016.
- Iceland applied in 2009 following an economic collapse, but formally withdrew in 2013 after the election of a new government.
See also
- Accession Treaty of Spain to the European Economic Community
- Eastern Partnership
- Enlargement of the African Union
- Enlargement of the eurozone
- Enlargement of the United Nations
- Enlargement of NATO
- Euronest Parliamentary Assembly
- European Economic Area
- European Free Trade Association
- European integration
- Foreign relations of the European Union
- Potential enlargement of the European Union
- Schengen Area
- Treaty of Accession 1994
- Treaty of Accession 2003
- Treaty of Accession 2005
- Treaty of Accession 2011
- Union for the Mediterranean
- Withdrawal from the European Union
Notes
References
- Current Article 1 of the Treaty on European Union reads:"The Union shall be founded on the present Treaty and on the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Those two Treaties shall have the same legal value. The Union shall replace and succeed the European Community".
- ^ "Turkey 2006 Progress Report" (PDF). European Commission. 8 November 2006. Retrieved 15 July 2024.
- ^ Kempf, Danny (13 December 2016). "EU says won't expand Turkey membership talks". yahoo.com. Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019.
- ^ "Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association process - Council conclusions (10555/18)" (PDF). Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 26 June 2018. Retrieved 16 July 2024.
- ^ "Council conclusions on Enlargement (16707/23)". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 12 December 2023. Retrieved 13 July 2024.
- ^ Uras, Umut (20 September 2023). "Is Turkey's bid for EU membership over?". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
- ^ "Enlargement: Türkiye". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 11 January 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ "'Huge, historic move': EU grants Bosnia and Herzegovina Candidate Status". Sarajevo Times. 15 December 2022. Retrieved 24 December 2022.
- ^ "Enlargement: Bosnia and Herzegovina". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 4 May 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ "Enlargement: Georgia". Consilium. General Secretariat of the Council. 7 February 2024. Retrieved 27 June 2024.
- ^ Xhabafti, Erion; Semini, Llazar (14 December 2022). "Kosovo leaders sign application request to join EU". Associated Press. Retrieved 14 December 2022.
- "PRESIDENCY CONCLUSIONS : Copenhagen European Council – 21–22 June 1993" (PDF). European Parliament. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- Article : A success for Konstantinos Karamanli on CVCE.eu
- "EU anger as France blocks move into Balkans". BBC News. 18 October 2019. Retrieved 30 November 2019.
- MOMTAZ, RYM; BARIGAZZI, JACOPO; BAYER, LILI (19 November 2019). "6 countries write to Juncker to support EU enlargement reform". Politico. Retrieved 8 March 2022.
- "Nov 2019 NP Enlargement EN" (PDF). Retrieved 30 November 2019.
- ^ "European Commission – Enlargement: Archives Country Profiles". European Commission. Archived from the original on 3 January 2011. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- ^ Timetable for accession negotiations by chapter and by country (1998–2004) CVCE.eu
- ^ Piket, Vincent EU Enlargement and Neighbourhood Policy Archived 3 September 2009 at the Wayback Machine, Institute for Strategic Studies
- ^ Bache, Ian; George, Stephen (2006). Politics in the European Union (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 540–542. ISBN 9780199276585.
- ^ Beyond Enlargement Fatigue? The Dutch debate on Turkish accession, European Security Initiative 2006
- Kardas, Saban (13 May 2009) Merkel and Sarkozy Call for Privileged Partnership Angers Turkey, Jamestown Foundation
- Schauble, Wolfgang (2004) Talking Turkey, Foreign Affairs
- ^ "EU launches accession talks with North Macedonia, Albania". Politico Europe. 19 July 2022. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
- "MEPs: Open accession talks with Ukraine, Moldova and Bosnia and Herzegovina". Politico. 13 December 2023.
- Civil.ge (3 March 2022). "Georgia's PM Signs Application to Join the EU". Civil.ge. Retrieved 3 March 2022.
- "European Council grants EU candidate status to Georgia - Council President". Agenda.ge. 14 December 2023. Retrieved 3 March 2024.
- "Iceland withdraws EU accession bid". Deutsche Welle. 12 March 2015. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
- Iceland's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (13 June 2013). "Minister Sveinsson meets with Stefan Füle". Archived from the original on 3 April 2015. Retrieved 19 June 2013.
- "European Commission- Enlargement- Kosovo*". European Commission. 28 June 2013. Retrieved 28 June 2013.
- ^ Anonymous (6 December 2016). "Check current status". European Neighbourhood Policy And Enlargement Negotiations – European Commission. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
- "Chronology". European Commission. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ^ "Statement by President von der Leyen on opening accession negotiations with Ukraine and Moldova". European Commission. 25 July 2024. Retrieved 25 June 2024.
- "EU Mulls Deeper Policy Cooperation with Morocco". Defense News. 22 March 2006. Retrieved 4 July 2006.
- European Commission (10 November 2005). "1972". The History of the European Union. Archived from the original on 14 June 2006. Retrieved 18 January 2006.
- European Commission (10 November 2005). "1994". The History of the European Union. Archived from the original on 14 June 2006. Retrieved 18 January 2006.
- ^ "La ofensiva europea" [The European Offensive]. ARTEHISTORIA (in Spanish). Junta de Castilla y León . Archived from the original on 11 January 2014. Retrieved 2 August 2013.
- "EU membership application not to be withdrawn". swissinfo. 26 October 2005. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
- "EU and Switzerland". British Embassy, Bern. 4 July 2006. Archived from the original on 28 April 2006. Retrieved 4 July 2006.
- ^ Reimann Lukas (21 March 2014). "Retirer la demande d'adhésion à l'UE et dire les choses telles qu'elles sont" [Withdraw the EU membership application and tell it like it is]. Federal Assembly (in French). Retrieved 15 June 2016.
- ^ "Retrait de la demande d'adhesion de la Suisse a l'UE" [Withdrawal of Switzerland's application for membership of the EU] (PDF) (in French). Swiss Federal Council. 27 July 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 October 2016. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
- "Turkey condemns European parliament committee call to suspend..." Reuters. 21 February 2019. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
- "Turkey Faces Crucial Vote on EU Accession Before Local Ballot". bloomberg.com. Retrieved 21 February 2019.
- European Commission (12 January 2015). "The Schuman Declaration – 9 May 1950". Retrieved 11 March 2016.
- Janse, Ronald (2018). "The evolution of the political criteria for accession to the European Community, 1957–1973". European Law Journal. 24: 57–76. doi:10.1111/eulj.12253. hdl:11245.1/6fc097fd-ebbf-4d72-9b2a-70c8a6df1116.
- Heidy Cristina Senante Berendes (2002). España ante la integración europea (1962-1967): el largo proceso para la apertura de negociaciones [Spain before European integration (1962-1967): the long process for opening negotiations] (PDF) (Thesis) (in Spanish). University of Alicante. p. 456. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 April 2015.
- European Economic Community Treaty, Article 7
- ^ "1971 Year in Review Archived 12 February 2009 at the Wayback Machine, UPI.com"
- For more on Ireland's attempts at membership see Michael J. Geary, An Inconvenient Wait: Ireland's Quest for Membership of the EEC, 1957–73 (Institute of Public Administration, 2009) (ISBN 9781904541837)
- "Turkey Secretariat General for EU affairs – Current situation in accession negotiations". Abgs.gov.tr. Archived from the original on 16 June 2011. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- ^ Bache, Ian; George, Stephen (2006). Politics in the European Union (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 543–547. ISBN 9780199276585.
- ^ Bache, Ian; George, Stephen (2006). Politics in the European Union (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 549–550. ISBN 9780199276585.
- Tang, Helena (1 January 2000). Progress Toward the Unification of Europe. World Bank Publications. p. 12. ISBN 9780821348031 – via Google Books.
- Fish, M. Steven; Gill, Graeme; Petrovic, Milenko (9 February 2017). A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed. Springer. p. 54. ISBN 9783319434377 – via Google Books.
- Poole, Peter A. (7 March 2003). Europe Unites: The EU's Eastern Enlargement. Greenwood. p. 157. ISBN 9780275977047 – via Google Books.
- ^ "transition report archive". European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. pp. 113, 121, 125, 137, 149, 153, 161, 165, 177, 181.
- World Economic Outlook, October 1999: Safeguarding Macroeconomci Stability at Low Inflation. International Monetary Fund. 1 October 1999. p. 68. ISBN 9781557758392 – via Google Books.
- Pizzati, Lodovico; Funck, Bernard (7 March 2002). Labor, Employment, and Social Policies in the EU Enlargement Process: Changing Perspectives and Policy Options. World Bank Publications. p. 30. ISBN 9780821350089 – via Google Books.
- OECD Review of Agricultural Policies: Romania 2000. OECD Publishing. 29 September 2000. p. 34. ISBN 9789264187825 – via Google Books.
- Filipov, Dimitŭr; Dorbritz, Jürgen (1 January 2003). Demographic Consequences of Economic Transition in Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Council of Europe. p. 29. ISBN 9789287151728 – via Google Books.
- Genov, Nikolai (22 April 2016). Global Trends in Eastern Europe. Routledge. p. 138. ISBN 9781317127246 – via Google Books.
- United Nations Economic and Social Council; Economic Commission for Europe; Committee for Trade, Industry and Enterprise Development (3 May 2005). "Evolution of the Industrial Sector in Transition Economies: A Statistical Overview" (PDF). p. 11.
- Dyson, Kenneth (2 November 2006). Enlarging the Euro Area: External Empowerment and Domestic Transformation in East Central Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 50. ISBN 978-0-19-151542-2 – via Google Books.
- Ulgenerk, Esen; Zlaoui, Leila (1 January 2000). From Transition to Accession: Developing Stable and Competitive Financial Markets in Bulgaria. World Bank Publications. p. 13. ISBN 9780821347812 – via Google Books.
- Dyson, Kenneth (2 November 2006). Enlarging the Euro Area: External Empowerment and Domestic Transformation in East Central Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 51. ISBN 978-0-19-151542-2 – via Google Books.
- Dyson, Kenneth (2 November 2006). Enlarging the Euro Area. p. 47. ISBN 978-0-19-151542-2 – via Google Books.
- Brudny, Yitzhak; Frankel, Jonathan; Hoffman, Stefani (21 June 2004). Restructuring Post-Communist Russia. Cambridge University Press. pp. 53–54. ISBN 9781139454797 – via Google Books.
- D'Amato, Giuseppe (2004). Viaggio nell'hansa baltica : l'Unione europea e l'allargamento ad Est (in Italian). Milan: Greco & Greco. ISBN 88-7980-355-7. OCLC 58727631.
- Giuseppe D'Amato, "L'EuroSogno ed i nuovi Muri ad Est. L'Unione europea e la dimensione orientale" . Greco&Greco, Milan, 2008 ISBN 978-88-7980-456-1
- "The Next Enlargement: Challenges and Opportunities: Speech by Sir Leon Brittan QC to Europapolitischer Kongress Organised By the CDU/CSU Group in the European Parliament" – Berlin 11 September 1995 and Günter Verheugen Member of the Commission responsible for Enlargement "Enlargement is irreversible": Debate on Enlargement in the European Parliament Strasbourg, 3 October 2000
- Dąborowski, Tomasz (8 January 2014). "Citizens of Bulgaria and Romania receive full rights on the EU labour market". osw.waw.pl.
- Börzel, Tanja A.; Dimitrova, Antoaneta; Schimmelfennig, Frank, eds. (24 October 2017). European Union Enlargement and Integration Capacity. doi:10.4324/9781315147109. ISBN 978-1-315-14710-9.
- "European Commission – Enlargement – Potential candidates – Enlargement". Archived from the original on 28 October 2011. Retrieved 28 October 2011.
- Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community and related instruments (ECSC treaty)(Paris, 18 April 1951)
- Documents Concerning the Accession to the European Communities of the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Kingdom of Norway and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Final Act, Declaration by the Government of the Federal Republic Of Germany on the Application to Berlin of the Decision Concerning Accession to the European Coal and Steel Community and of the Treaty of Accession to the European Economic Community and to the European Atomic Energy Community
- "The provisions of Part Four of the Treaty were applied to Surinam, by virtue of a Supplementary Act of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to complete its instrument of ratification, from 1 September 1962 to 16 July 1976.", in: eur-lex.europa.eu – Treaty establishing the European Community (consolidated version)
- CONVENTION portant révision du traité instituant la Communauté économique européenne en vue de rendre applicable aux Antilles néerlandaises le régime spécial d' association défini dans la quatrième partie de se traité
- "Grondwettelijke aspecten: Territoriale werking / Antillen".
- "361 – An evaluation of the EU's Fifth Enlargement With special focus on Bulgaria & Romania". Fritz Breuss, Research Institute for European Affairs (Europainstitut) and Vienna University of Economics & Business Administration – European Commission. European Commission. 3 June 2009. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- ^ "PROTOCOL No 1 : ON AMENDMENTS TO THE STATUTE OF THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK" (DOC). European Parliament. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- "EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION of 29 October 2010 amending the status with regard to the European Union of the island of Saint-Barthélemy". Eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- "Home". Europa (web portal). Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- "European Council President welcomes Croatia". News and Announcements. Government of the Republic Croatia. Archived from the original on 16 September 2013. Retrieved 23 August 2013.
- "RECENT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN EU CANDIDATE COUNTRIES" (PDF). Europa (web portal). Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- "EU welcomes Croatia's 'historic moment' on eve of entry". Eubusiness.com. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- "EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION of 11 July 2012 amending the status of Mayotte with regard to the European Union". Eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- Article 126 of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community
- Council of the European Union (26 June 2024). "Sixteenth meeting of the Accession Conference with Montenegro at Ministerial level (press release by the Council of the EU)". Consilium. Retrieved 1 August 2024.
- Tatiana Marinova; Simona-Alex Mihaleva (17 June 2024). "President Radev: Bulgaria Supports Montenegro's European Integration". BTA. Retrieved 1 August 2024.
- Milojko Spajić (16 December 2024). "Press conference - Part 2 - Preliminary remarks by Milojko Spajić, Prime Minister of Montenegro, during the press conference following the EU-Montenegro Intergovernmental Conference on 16 December 2024 in Brussels" (video). Consilium. Retrieved 16 December 2024.
- "Strategy for the Western Balkans". Europa: European Commission. 6 February 2018. Retrieved 18 May 2018.
- "EU-Western Balkans summit in Sofia". Council of Europe. 17 May 2018. Retrieved 18 May 2018.
- Martin, Dimitrov (23 April 2018). "Balkans Labeled 'Partners' Instead of 'States' for Sofia Summit". Balkan Insight. Retrieved 18 May 2013.
- "Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the European Parliament Plenary Session on the Western Balkan Strategy". European Union External Action Service. 6 February 2018. Retrieved 18 May 2018.
- Treisman, Rachel (28 February 2022). "Ukraine wants to join the EU. Here's how that would work". NPR. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- "'New reality' prompts Georgia's urgent application to join EU". BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 March 2022. Retrieved 2 March 2022.
- "Maia Sandu a semnat cererea de aderare a Republicii Moldova la Uniunea Europeană". Digi24 (in Romanian). Retrieved 3 March 2022.
- "European Parliament recommends giving Ukraine EU candidate status". The Jerusalem Post. 1 March 2022. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
- "European Commission backs Ukraine for EU candidate status". Al Jazeera. 17 June 2022. Retrieved 17 June 2022.
- "Opinion on the EU membership application by Georgia". European Commission. 17 June 2022. Retrieved 11 January 2023.
- "EU to begin Ukraine accession negotiations, says Michel". RTE. 14 December 2023. Retrieved 24 December 2022.
- "EU halts Georgia's accession to the bloc, freezes aid over much-criticized law". 9 July 2024. Retrieved 11 July 2024.
- "NIKOL PASHINYAN SAID THAT YOU SHOULD APPLY TO BECOME A CANDIDATE FOR EU MEMBERSHIP BEFORE AUTUMN AT THE LATEST". hraparak.am.
- "Joint Motion for a Resolution on closer ties between the EU and Armenia and the need for a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia | RC-B9-0163/2024 | European Parliament". www.europarl.europa.eu.
- "Historical overview". www.norway.no. 12 July 2022. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
- "EU membership application not to be withdrawn". swissinfo. 26 October 2005. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
- British Embassy, Bern (4 July 2006). "EU and Switzerland". The UK & Switzerland. Archived from the original on 28 April 2006. Retrieved 4 July 2006.
- "Iceland". www.consilium.europa.eu. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
- "Iceland drops EU membership bid: 'interests better served outside' union". The Guardian. AFP. 12 March 2015. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 24 May 2023.
External links
- Enlargement Archived 15 July 2016 at the Wayback Machine – Europa
- EU enlargement documentation on EUR-Lex
- European Union Member States and applicant countries – CVCE
- Archival material concerning the enlargement of the European Union can be consulted at the Historical Archives of the European Union in Florence
Enlargement and partners of the European Union | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Previous enlargements | |||||||||
Candidates |
| ||||||||
Potential candidates | |||||||||
Partnerships |
| ||||||||
Other geographically European countries | |||||||||
Territorial evolution of the world | |
---|---|
By country | |
By former country | |
By subdivision |
|
By region |
|
By country, people, region or period | |
By international organisation | |