| Revision as of 23:15, 13 July 2008 editShot info (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,052 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:07, 30 December 2024 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors373,261 editsm Fix Linter errors. | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div style="{{{style|text-align: center; width: 60%; margin: auto; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px gold; background-color: royalblue; color: white; font-weight: bold;}}}"><span style="letter-spacing: 5px;">{{{title|This user is taking a kit kat-break.}}}</span>{{#if:{{{1|}}}|<br /><br />{{{1}}}}}</div> | |||
| {{semi-retired|date=April 2008}} | |||
| ]{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | |||
| {{bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}} | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |||
| |counter = 6 | |||
| |algo = old(5d) | |||
| |archive = User talk:QuackGuru/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| == |
== Check sources == | ||
| www.scoop.it/t/the-future-of-e-cigarette | |||
| {{#if:|<div style="background:white; border:2px Blue solid; padding:12px;">|}} | |||
| {{#ifeq:|true|==|'''}}Greetings...{{#ifeq:|true|==|'''}} | |||
| <p>Hello, QuackGuru, and ''''']''''' | |||
| : To get started, click on the green welcome. | |||
| :: I hope you like it here and decide to stay!<!-- | |||
| -->{{#if:Xp54321|::: Xp54321|}}<!-- | |||
| -->{{#if:Xp54321|::::|:::}} Happy editing! ] (]) 21:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)</p> | |||
| {{#if:|</div>|}} | |||
| http://www.economist.com/topics/electronic-cigarettes | |||
| ==Quackwatch== | |||
| QuackGuru, enough, you are now arguing with two different administrators about the definition of "revert". I recommend that you take a break, and avoid posting at ] for a day. If you disagree, I can upgrade this to a formal ban, but I'm hoping that simply asking you to take a break will suffice. Please go work on something else for awhile? --]]] 19:21, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/electronic-cigarettes/ | |||
| I think there was a misunderstanding. The text is sourced. | |||
| http://www.tobacco.org/ | |||
| I was in the middle of writing this comment. Can I finish posting this comment. | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ::::::::This information was deleted. ''but criticizes its rhetorical style as "perhaps not the best way to win an argument, especially with serious-minded people."'' | |||
| ] | |||
| ::::::::Ludwigs2 restored the deleted information. | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| ::::::::This was a revert by Ludwigs2. ] 19:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The page ] has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done under ], because the page appeared to be an unambiguous ]. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://medium.com/@seozenius/ayurveda-the-ancient-indian-system-of-medicine-is-based-on-the-principle-of-maintaining-a-balance-d37f47436f0d. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be ]'''. | |||
| : I would rather that you didn't, because you are again mis-defining the term "revert". I am keeping close tabs on Ludwigs2's edits, and have been engaging him in discussion at his talkpage. If he makes a real revert, I assure you I'll be dealing with him very rapidly. --]]] 19:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at ]. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see ] for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at ] for more details, or ask a question ]. | |||
| ::Ludwigs2 restored the identical part of the sentence that was previously deleted. It was a real revert. ] 19:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Still not a revert, because he substantially changed the paragraph. Yes the wording in that specific quote is the same, but it's a quote, so of course it is going to be the same. To call it a "revert", I'd want to see something that was more specific, where the edit obviously removed or re-added ''just'' the text in a previous edit, without changing anything else towards trying to find a compromise. --]]] 19:54, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Draft%3AAyurveda|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at ]. <!-- Template:Db-copyvio-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> ] (]) 11:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It was still a revert based on what is a revert. ] 20:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| ==What is a revert?== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
| The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| A ], in this context, means undoing, ''in whole or in part'', the actions of another editor or of other editors. This can include undoing edits to a page, deleting content or restoring deleted content, undoing ] (sometimes called "move warring"), undoing ] (sometimes called "]"), or recreating a page. | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| An editor does not have to perform ''the same'' revert on a page more than three times to breach this rule; all reverts made by an editor on a particular page within a 24 hour period are counted. | |||
| == <s>Copyvio on Health effects of electronic cigarettes</s> == | |||
| Please read ]. Ludwigs2 edit was a revert because Ludwigs2 . ] 20:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : I am very familiar with 3RR. The definition of "restoring deleted content", would more apply to something like what Jossi did, which was just copy/pasting information in from a previous version of the article, but without making any attempt to change the text. Let me try and explain it another way: The goal of the editing conditions, is to help the editors on the page try to find a compromise wording. This will probably involve having some text by some editors, and some text by others. That's okay, and that's not a revert. Or to put it another way: If one editor adds "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ" to the article, and another editor deletes half, leaving "ABCDEFGHIJKLM", and then the first editor changes it to "ABCDEFGHIKJKLMSTUVXY", and then the other editor changes it to ABCDEFGHIJKLMNSUV", and the other editor says, "Okay, I can live with that." Neither one of them is reverting. They are both ''changing'' the text, in a back and forth method, trying to find a compromise. Does that make more sense? --]]] 20:41, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <s>] Your edit to ] has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added ] material to Misplaced Pages without evidence of ] from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read ] for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''content'', such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be ]'''. See ] for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright -->⸺] 03:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)</s> | |||
| ::There was no change to the specific text and that's a real revert. | |||
| Withdrawn.⸺] 07:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Elonka wrote in part: Yes the wording in that specific quote is the same, but it's a quote, so of course it is going to be the same. | |||
| ::Based on what is a revert Ludwigs2 made a real revert. Is that clear enough for you? ] 20:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: To prove it was a revert, I would like to see a diff that shows an exact one-to-one correspondence between an original edit, and a new edit. If the wording is changed, or new sources are added, it is not a revert. It is clear that you are not understanding the definition of revert, in the context of the editing conditions. But that's why we have uninvolved administrators here. In the future, when you see something that you think is a revert, you can bring it up, but if an uninvolved admin says, "No, that's not a revert," then you should accept that and move on. Continuing to bring up the same thing over and over, is not helpful. Also, in terms of Ludwigs2's edits, he is obviously embarked on a major series of changes to the article. Rather than scrutinizing every edit, better would be to wait a few hours, until he's done, and then look at the entire set of changes. If he's just bit by bit reverting to an earlier version (which I don't think he is), it'll show up when he's done. There's no need to critique each small change. Please, try working on something else for awhile? There are many other areas of Misplaced Pages which could benefit from your attention. Check something at ], or add a stub to fill in a redlink, such as at ]. Or, just click on ] a few times. I usually find that within a dozen clicks, I have either found something that I want to fix, or at least tag as needing cleanup. :) --]]] 21:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==<s>CCI Notice</s>== | |||
| ::::Elonka wrote in part: Yes the wording in that specific quote is the same, but it's a quote, so of course it is going to be the same. | |||
| ::::Elonka acknowledged the text is the same. Readding the same text is clearly a revert per ]. | |||
| <s>Hello, QuackGuru. This message is being sent to inform you that a '''request for a contributor copyright investigation''' has been filed at ] concerning your contributions to Misplaced Pages in relation to ]. The listing can be found ]. Thank you. <!--Template:CCI-notice--> ⸺] 04:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)</s> | |||
| ::::but criticizes its rhetorical style as "perhaps not the best way to win an argument, especially with serious-minded people." | |||
| :{{ping|Randomstaplers}} QuackGuru always followed sources very closely to minimize misinterpretation of what the source said but, as I remember, the wording was substantially rearranged and not a copyvio problem. I know copyright checking is painful and I don't want to add to the stress but would it be possible to give, say, two examples of text added to Misplaced Pages and the corresponding originals? I had a quick look at ] but found it hard to identify a problem. Perhaps you could add an example at ]. Thanks. ] (]) 05:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::but criticizes its rhetorical style as "perhaps not the best way to win an argument, especially with serious-minded people." | |||
| <s>::* @]: Go to https://copyvios.toolforge.org/ and paste in the URLs from the CCI. This is pretty bad.⸺] 05:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)</s> | |||
| ::::Ludwigs2 .] 21:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Withdrawn. So far only one copyvio. Sorry for the trouble. I'll leave this up in case anyone else is confused. ⸺] 07:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: Yes, the wording of that specific phrase is identical to a previous version of the article. If that was the ''only'' thing that he was restoring, then it would be a revert. But it's not the only thing he's restoring. He also is making many other changes, which seem to be a good faith effort to be sensitive to previous concerns, in an attempt to try and find a compromise version. That's not a revert, that's more of a "negotiative edit". Now please, stop calling it a revert, otherwise you may run afoul of ]. I recommend waiting a day, letting Ludwigs2 finish with his edits, and then you (or anyone else) can go in and continue to edit the article, in an attempt to change wording to something that you like better. Then Ludwigs2 (or anyone) can make their own edits, and back and forth. If certain phrases get restored and deleted in this back and forth process, that's okay, as it's part of consensus-building, as long as each side makes a good faith effort to try and find a compromise from previous versions. --]]] 21:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Elonka acknowledged: Yes, the wording of that specific phrase is identical to a previous version of the article. | |||
| :@] Withdrawn the CCI, only one actual copyvio so far: this , with this . ⸺] 07:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Restoring deleted content is the definition of a revert. That's a revert, and not a "negotiative edit". | |||
| ::@] I've gone ahead and addressed it. Hoping that's all of them.⸺] 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Making other changes does not change the fact that it was revert. The same text was restored which counts as a revert according to ]. | |||
| :::Thanks for your work! ] (]) 09:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::It is a revert (readding the same exact text) based on what is a revert per ]. ] 21:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ::::::::LOL, Elonka, I think you just gave the Wikilawyers an "out". Be prepared for lots of "reverts + other edits". I did warn you that you had to come down heavy on your side of the fence rather than just SA + Ronz. ] (]) 23:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 05:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:07, 30 December 2024
This user is taking a kit kat-break.
Check sources
www.scoop.it/t/the-future-of-e-cigarette
http://www.economist.com/topics/electronic-cigarettes
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/electronic-cigarettes/
Speedy deletion of Draft:Ayurveda
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Draft:Ayurveda has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://medium.com/@seozenius/ayurveda-the-ancient-indian-system-of-medicine-is-based-on-the-principle-of-maintaining-a-balance-d37f47436f0d. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Vaping for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vaping, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vaping until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio on Health effects of electronic cigarettes
Your edit to Health effects of electronic cigarettes has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Misplaced Pages:Copying text from other sources for more information. ⸺RandomStaplers 03:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
CCI Notice
Hello, QuackGuru. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Misplaced Pages in relation to Misplaced Pages's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. ⸺RandomStaplers 04:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Randomstaplers: QuackGuru always followed sources very closely to minimize misinterpretation of what the source said but, as I remember, the wording was substantially rearranged and not a copyvio problem. I know copyright checking is painful and I don't want to add to the stress but would it be possible to give, say, two examples of text added to Misplaced Pages and the corresponding originals? I had a quick look at Health effects of electronic cigarettes but found it hard to identify a problem. Perhaps you could add an example at Talk:Health effects of electronic cigarettes. Thanks. Johnuniq (talk) 05:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
::* @Johnuniq: Go to https://copyvios.toolforge.org/ and paste in the URLs from the CCI. This one is pretty bad.⸺RandomStaplers 05:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn. So far only one copyvio. Sorry for the trouble. I'll leave this up in case anyone else is confused. ⸺RandomStaplers 07:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq Withdrawn the CCI, only one actual copyvio so far: this Diff, with this document. ⸺RandomStaplers 07:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq I've gone ahead and addressed it. Hoping that's all of them.⸺RandomStaplers 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work! Johnuniq (talk) 09:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq I've gone ahead and addressed it. Hoping that's all of them.⸺RandomStaplers 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Weasel word some span
Template:Weasel word some span has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)