| Revision as of 23:33, 5 September 2005 editFlcelloguy (talk | contribs)15,378 edits →Block: Comments← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:31, 2 October 2023 edit undoQwerfjkl (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Rollbackers212,880 edits Notifying user about Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members (via script) | ||
| (409 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| Archives: ] - ] - ] - ] - ] | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| Welcome to the chat room! Please feel free to place your comments here. | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ---- | |||
| <blockquote>'''non notable song'''</blockquote> | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Protected. ] 00:37, 21 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, good. Thanks. -- ] 00:38, 21 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Nice job getting that one guy--] 15:53, 21 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==Allroy== | |||
| Just saw your request for Jimbo to ban Allroy, and then his talk page, which seems like you two made up (please correct me if my glance was wrong). In the future, it's better if you ask a sysops like Danny from above, or myself to do blockings, as Jimbo is generally only involved in overall policy and only the absolute critical cases involving users. Between running Bomis, Wikicities, and Wikimedia, and speaking at lectures in all corners of the globe, he's got little time to do individual tasks. Thanks! -- ] | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == Re:The Offspring's EP Baghdad == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Thanks Mike. Yeah, AMG has nothing on it. I'll see what I can come up with. ] 22:27, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 23:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, I know AMG doesn't have it and the original art cover of their self-titled album before the recent one. -- ] 22:29, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == CfD nomination at {{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members}} == | |||
| ::Okay, if you can provide the personnel, that'd be great. I don't know anything about it myself. ] 22:34, 22 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''{{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members}}''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notify--> Thank you. ]] 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Producer == | |||
| Hey again Mike. I was just wondering what do you use in order to find producers of albums so fast as well as other facts so quickly? ] 02:36, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi. I was just wondering where you got your information on the recording date of ''Every Good Boy Deserves Fudge''. All Music says it was recorded in 1991, so i was just wondering if it says so differently on another site or if u have the actual album. Thanks. ] 17:03, July 27, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == civility policy - explained by a sysop == | |||
| Please be nice to newbies and anon's. If someone needs a "harsh warning", you can ask a sysop (like me). | |||
| Paradoxically, using harsh words to try to make someone toe the line can backfire. (You could run afoul of our civility policy yourself, and you wouldn't want '''that''', would you? ;-) | |||
| I unlocked the ] page, but if anyone starts bad-mouthing anyone - either via ] or ], I'll have to ask him to take some time off from this project. ] 16:53, August 1, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Adminship == | |||
| Hello Mike. Can I nominate you for an adminship? - ] 13:46, 4 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Done. Just go ] and answer a few questions. - ] 14:16, 4 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == A beating == | |||
| Man, you have taken quite a beating and still standing, you have to really love Misplaced Pages. Now even monitoring articles for vandalism. --] 17:29, 5 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Aerosmith's ''Box of Fire'' == | |||
| Thanks for fixing up that article, Mike. I had a feeling that each disc was a different Aerosmith album, but I didn't know which one was which. ] | ] 19:38, 7 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == System of a Down == | |||
| Mike, I'm baffled by your reverts to ]. Aren't you aware that Billboard is the company that originally publishes the chart positions for all the singles? AMG's data comes directly from Billboard, and is currently out of date. Can you please explain why you are adding misinformation to articles? I have shown you evidence that BYOB peaked at #4 on the Mainstream and Modern Rock charts. ] 21:42, August 8, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes, Rhobite, of course I know that Billboard is the company that originally publishes the chart positions for all the singles. But, I don't care which source to cite for charting singles. I wasn't trying to say that the allmusic.com or billboard.com version is correct. That's why I kept reverting you and anon users on '']''. -- ] | ] 21:49, August 8, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::That's as total a non-sequitir as I've ever seen... you "don't care", but you keep reverting anyway. ] 22:55, August 8, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::That answer is incomprehensible. You keep reverting the changes because you don't care which source is cited? It is obvious that the Billboard data is more recent than the AMG data, since they report a higher peak chart position. Therefore we should use the Billboard data. Unfortunately Danny appears to be away, so I'm not sure what to do; if you continue to add incorrect information to the article, I may block you from editing temporarily. ] 00:16, August 9, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Band names requiring pluralized verbs == | |||
| Hi, you recently changed the first line in ] from "Refused were a hardcore band" to "Refused was a hardcore band". I am changing it back from "was" to "were": most band names, though they don't look like it, are plural, and in the same way one would say, for instance, "the '''men''' were '''a band''' of brothers" or "the '''flowers''' were fashioned into '''a single bouquet'''", so it is that "Refused were a band". This is the standard in English generally and in the music press: please see the first sentences of ], ], ], or ] for examples of this usage. | |||
| Many other music articles employ the usage that you are advocating, though this is an Americanism not for use in writing: if you read further on in, for example, ], ], ], or ] and others (all American bands), the name of the band accompanied by a singular verb in the first sentence is immediately followed by sentences with the plural pronoun "they", directly referring to the band. For instance, the following needs to be fixed: "The Mars Volta '''is''' an American musical group founded by Cedric Bixler Zavala and Omar Rodriguez-Lopez. '''They are''' generally considered rock, with heavy punk, prog and Latin influences. '''They are''' known for their wild live shows..." | |||
| If "they" replaces "The Mars Volta" in the second and third sentence, it must also be able to do this in the first, but as it stands this cannot be done: "They (Mars Volta) is an American musical group..." is clearly incorrect. This incongruity isn't acceptable even given the modern English usage of "]" to refer to an unknown or unfamiliar person, since that usage is based on gender neutrality, which is not at issue with these band names. | |||
| Are you making changes based on some grammatical rule I don't know about? —] 03:11, 10 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :There are differences in American vs. British usage in this regard. The British usage seems to be to use plural verbs when discussing any sort of group or organization, such as company names. American usage tends more to the singular except in cases where the group name actually sounds plural; "The Beatles are..." and "The New York Yankees are..." sounds OK, but "Pink Floyd are..." and "IBM are..." sound funny because those names don't have "s" at the end. "The Boston Red Sox are..." is OK, since it sounds plural even if it's got an "x" instead of "s", but for non-plural-sounding team names like "The Miami Heat", "is" sounds better. I suppose, however, that the British have no problem saying "Manchester United are..." in their own sports reports. ] 03:45, August 10, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Are you sure this is an American/British thing? I'm American, not British, and the grammar I explained above is common American English as far as I can tell. The American music press also follows my "pluralized" usage: search for ] or ] at , for instance, or read randomly selected news dispatch from MTV.com (note: "System of a Down are...", "Built to Spill have..."). You are talking about American sports press (which I also follow a lot <tt>:)</tt>... ha!), which is not famous for its good grammar but perhaps more for its colloquialisms, such as the one being discussed. As I said, the "singular" construction is common, but not fit for writing, unlike other AE/BE conflicts which involve sound conventions on both sides. —] 04:29, 10 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Help== | |||
| Two of the Motorhead singles are in VfD as the editor who redirected Ace of Spades and Motorhead live versions put them there after I undid his redirects. ] and ] - please help by voting to keep, the timelines will make no sense, the discography will be shot, they are too young to die. thanks, ] 12:05, 13 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Mike Starr == | |||
| I know that name from somewhere...I just can't remember where... ] 04:13, 22 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :He was the original bassist for the famous ] group ] until ]. -- ] 14:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Geez Louise! I wrote that article, you would think I'd have remembered... sorry for being a little slow on the draw there, perdner... ] 05:33, 23 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Content disputes == | |||
| Please do not add content disputes to ]. --]] 23:10, August 24, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :And do not remove complaints about yourself from WP:3RR, it could easily be seen as trying to hide something and disruption. --]] 00:00, August 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Please stop removing the 3RR charge. Let admins sort it out. If you continue to remove it, you will be blocked. Thanks! ] |<small> ]</font color>| ] 00:01, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I have blocked you for six hours for disruption for removing other peoples comments from talk pages. Please try mediation or if necessary an RfC after you return, but do not continue this edit war and do not remove other people's talk. --]] 00:05, August 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Mike, if you can't provide a legitimate source (an interview or a music publication) for the Hypnotize naming thing, please don't add it to articles. Thanks. ] 00:32, August 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Hephaestos == | |||
| Mike, please stop Hephaestos's user page. He isn't here any more, it's your fault, and even now you '''continue''' to vandalise his page, adding insult to injury. The evidence that you have been doing this via anonomous IP addresses for months (years) is overwhelming. I don't understand what your obsession with him and images of penises is, but you have to stop. The very next time a penis shows up on Hephaestos's page, I'm filing a ]. ]( ], ], ],) 16:20, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm sorry, but I didn't do it. -- ] 16:27, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :It's a vandal. See ] with a period at the end. ] 16:35, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| sorry, nevermind, I thought it was the same kind of user vandalism I had to deal with yesterday. Must be different somehow. ] 16:38, 25 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Paul Lennon== | |||
| Please don't add nonsense to this article. No-one supposes he is related to John Lennon. If you do this again I will report you for vandalism, for which you already obviously have a bad reputation. ] 04:16, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :This goes for the other articles about people named Lennon (first or last name) -- ] 11:31, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Forging?== | |||
| Did you forge ]'s sig ? ]] 04:33, August 26, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Lennon articles == | |||
| Why would anyone be confused? Are you going to go through every single biographical article and list all the other people with a similar name and say that they are not related? The opposite is the case - if there was some link between the names, it would be noted. The changes you are making are cluttering up the articles, and I'll continue to revert them. -- ] 14:27, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Mike, you were unbanned after a long period of being banned '''on the condition''' that you behave sensibly and not vandalise or make stupid edits to articles. And here you are doing it again. Do you want to get banned again? ] 14:41, 26 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I seem to remember at one point the article on ] specifically noted that he's unrelated to ], but that's not there any more. I guess it's not really a good idea to fill up articles with notes about who or what the subject of the article is ''not'' related to, though in some cases where there's a popular misconception about a relationship that doesn't exist there might be cause for such a note. ] 15:51, August 26, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Jeff Garcia == | |||
| Are you related to ]? ]] 21:21, August 27, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :No. I'm not related to any famous Garcias. -- ] 21:23, August 27, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Okee dokee. ]] 21:25, August 27, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Then maybe you should put notes on your user page about all the famous Garcias you're not related to, just like you're doing for the famous Lennons not related to John? ] 22:10, August 27, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandalism vs Content disputes == | |||
| Please stop referring to content disputes as vandalism. This merely polarises the discussion and does nothing to help solve the issues at hand. --]] 01:29, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Making nonsense edits to multiple articles, in the knowledge that other people will have to spend their time cleaning up after you, is vandalism. ] 01:36, 30 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Nonsense is in the eye of the beholder, I get plenty of google hits for both system of a down being nu metal as well as alternative metal. ]. --]] 02:05, August 30, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::I see where you're coming from fvw, but I agree with Adam - these edits are pointless and are just going to be reverted whenever they are made. -- ] 21:57, 30 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Hephaestos == | |||
| Mike, I have blocked your main account for 24 hours for your tireless obsessive vandalism of ] page. This has to stop. I am collecting IP evidence to show that the vandalism to that page, despite coming from multiple AOL IPs, is beyond a reasonable doubt coming from you. Please respect the block. If you wish to protest it, I'm sure enough other admins watch your talk page that they will hear you plead your case. ]( ], ], ],) 01:26, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :For the last time, I am ''NOT'' the one who vandalized Hephaestos' user page, so stop accusing me and unblock me now! -- ] 01:48, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| How could IP evidence prove anything about specific AOL users? AOL IP addresses are assigned by page, not by user. If Mike in ] accesses ], he may very well have the same IP address on that page as Bob the AOLVandal in ]. ]] 02:39, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Guanaco, first, I won't object if you unblock Mike. That would be your call as an admin very senior to me. Second, no, because Mike knows that we are friggin powerless to do '''anything''' about AOL users, he ensures that we can never '''conclusively''' prove that his vandalisms are his with rigourous verifiability, because of course could just happen to use the same AOL IP addresses within '''minutes''' of Hephaestos-stakers placing images of penises, etc. | |||
| :Look, I know Mike's history, I know that we're all being nice to him in the hopes that he won't become ''public Misplaced Pages enemy number one'' again, but he '''must stop vandalising Heph's page!'''. He personally chased Heph away, and he is '''still chasing him'''. It adds insult to injury, and I can't stomach it any more. | |||
| :The diff-evidence, combined with IP address evidence will be overwhelming, as I'm sure the ArbCom will find. ]( ], ], ],) 03:11, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Actually, I am not an admin anymore, so I cannot unblock Mike Garcia. Even if I could, I would recuse myself from using admin powers in this case. I will wait for the IP evidence to be shown before I make up my mind on this. ]] 00:24, 1 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::Eh, moot point anyway. Appearently, I didn't block ] but ], whom was subsequently unblocked by ]. In any case, I'm currently embroiled in an open proxy thingy. I was angry, and I've calmed down, but the next time a vandalism occurs on Heph's user or talk page with all the classic trademarks of ], or the next time I see someone impersonating Heph , I'm putting in a request for arbitration. ]( ], ], ],) 02:06, 1 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == User categories == | |||
| Hi Mike. Unfortunately it's not right for you to put your user page in ] and ], these are for articles only so I have removed them. However you can use {{]}}, {{]}}, {{]}} or {{]}} on your user page depending on your level of skill, which will also put you in a category. ] ] 10:46, 1 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Hypnotize == | |||
| Mike, I've no idea what this fuss is all about but you seem to be not quite right there. A {dubious} is a compromise between the deletion and the addition of your unverified claim. I've nothing against you but I read the article a month or so ago and believed it, so I feel a bit fooled now. You cannot call my edit "vandalism", I know what vandalism is in wikipedia and therefore feel libelled. Please stop reverting now because you're already above your 3reverts. Just let go for today. I advised that the anon too.] 15:44, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Block == | |||
| Mike Garcia, I have blocked you for 24 hours for a ] violation on ], per ]. This appears to be a clear cut ] violation; I will reiterate that in 3RR it does '''not''' matter who is "right" or "wrong"- it is only to prevent edit warring. Mike Garcia, looking at the talk page, I think they're trying to get you to cite your sources, so in the future, don't revert when there appears to be a consensus against adding that statement. Regardless, unless it is clear-cut vandalism (which this does not appear to be), '''do not''' revert more than 3 times in a 24 hour period. Thanks for your understanding, and feel free to contribute to Misplaced Pages after your block expires. ] |<small> ]</font color>| ] 16:36, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Mike, I will ] and presume that some AOL IP addresses are not you, as ] charges. In either case, I stumbled upon your previous messages telling Pasboudin to "prepare to leave", and also placing a "vandal" tag on his page. I urge you to remain civil and not do any of those things (see ] and ]). If you have a dispute with Pasboudin, please see ], where you can file a ], undergo ], or file an ]. Thanks for your understanding! ] |<small> ]</font color>| ] 23:33, 5 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:31, 2 October 2023
Redirect to:
Proposed deletion of Stand Up (Trapt song)
The article Stand Up (Trapt song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
non notable song
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)