Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Steve Titmus: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:09, 25 July 2008 editLester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,805 edits →Steve Titmus: delete← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:48, 27 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(13 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''Keep''', consensus is that with the sources found the article establishes notability. ] (]) 20:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Steve Titmus}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Steve Titmus}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Line 9: Line 15:


*'''Delete''' Doesn't look like he did anything other than be a good news anchor for a few years. ] (] | ]) 05:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Doesn't look like he did anything other than be a good news anchor for a few years. ] (] | ]) 05:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' The article as it stands is unreferenced, so it doesn't deserve to stay.--''']''' 08:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC) <s>*'''Delete''' The article as it stands is unreferenced, so it doesn't deserve to stay.--''']''' 08:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)</s>
**'''Keep''', looking at the references that have recently been added, I change my vote from delete to keep. However, the article content needs to be reworked to reflect both positive and negative elements of Titmus' career. As it stands, it's a glowing CV, but that can be fixed.--''']''' 20:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' This article fails to establish sufficient notability for an article in WP. All but one of the claims is unsupported by any citation of a suitable source. This looks like original research. ] (]) 08:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''- Passes Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines for ]:
** There's already two sources independent of the subject, and doubtless more can be found.
** ''The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.''- presenting the weekday news on a state-wide TV stqation for five years obviously qualifies him for that.
** Per ], which covers TV personalities, ''Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions.'', he was on TV five times a week for half a decade. Passes easily. ] ] 08:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per refs added which meet ] and is ]. State awards would look better referenced.--] ''<small>]</small>'' 11:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''', secondary coverage exists, was a statewide television personality for a number of years. ] <sup>(])</sup> 12:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC).
*Keep per Lankiveil and Sting. —''']''' 12:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as passing ] (if it didn't then, it does now). ''']'''] 14:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' per Reyk the revised article meets biographical guidelines for notability now. ] (]) 20:32, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 22:48, 27 March 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, consensus is that with the sources found the article establishes notability. Davewild (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Steve Titmus

Steve Titmus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable former regional television presenter turned real-estate agent. Mattinbgn\ 05:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


*Delete The article as it stands is unreferenced, so it doesn't deserve to stay.--Lester 08:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

    • Keep, looking at the references that have recently been added, I change my vote from delete to keep. However, the article content needs to be reworked to reflect both positive and negative elements of Titmus' career. As it stands, it's a glowing CV, but that can be fixed.--Lester 20:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete This article fails to establish sufficient notability for an article in WP. All but one of the claims is unsupported by any citation of a suitable source. This looks like original research. Dolphin51 (talk) 08:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep- Passes Misplaced Pages's notability guidelines for people:
    • There's already two sources independent of the subject, and doubtless more can be found.
    • The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.- presenting the weekday news on a state-wide TV stqation for five years obviously qualifies him for that.
    • Per WP:ENTERTAINER, which covers TV personalities, Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television, stage performances, and other productions., he was on TV five times a week for half a decade. Passes easily. Reyk YO! 08:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per refs added which meet WP:N and is WP:V. State awards would look better referenced.--Sting Buzz Me... 11:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, secondary coverage exists, was a statewide television personality for a number of years. Lankiveil 12:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC).
  • Keep per Lankiveil and Sting. —Giggy 12:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep as passing general notability (if it didn't then, it does now). Synergy 14:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per Reyk the revised article meets biographical guidelines for notability now. JBsupreme (talk) 20:32, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.