Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/InteLib (software library): Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 12:39, 25 July 2008 editSean Whitton (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users7,815 edits Relisting debate← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 03:44, 7 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
			:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
			<!--Template:Afd top

			Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

			The result was '''delete'''. ] \| ] 19:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

	===]===		===]===
			{{ns:0\|T}}
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|T}}

	:{{la\|InteLib (software library)}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>		:{{la\|InteLib (software library)}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
	Non-notable programming library. Article probably created by the inventor, and all references are to his own works. Prod contested by author. '']'' 16:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)		Non-notable programming library. Article probably created by the inventor, and all references are to his own works. Prod contested by author. '']'' 16:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
	*'''Weak Delete''' A quick search of and the turn up no evidence of this library being used as the basis for further work. Googling on "Intelib" itself fails to turn up reliable source reviews, although it does seem to be a reasonably widely distributed library. <small>~~—Preceding~~ ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		* '''Weak Delete''' A quick search of and the turn up no evidence of this library being used as the basis for further work. Googling on "Intelib" itself fails to turn up reliable source reviews, although it does seem to be a reasonably widely distributed library. <small> — Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
	*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] \| ] 20:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)</small>		* <small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] \| ] 20:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)</small>
	<hr style="width:50%;"/>		<hr style="width:50%;"/>
	:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <~~font~~ ~~color~~="navy">]</~~font~~>] 03:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->		:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]] 03:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
	<hr style="width:50%;"/>		<hr style="width:50%;"/>
	:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 05:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->		:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 05:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
	*'''Weak Delete''' per lack of notability. ] (]) 09:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)		* '''Weak Delete''' per lack of notability. ] (]) 09:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

	<hr style="width:50%;"/>		<hr style="width:50%;"/>
	:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 00:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->		:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 00:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->

	<hr style="width:50%;"/>		<hr style="width:50%;"/>
	:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —] / 12:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->		:<span style="color:Chocolate;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ] / 12:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
			* '''Delete''' this already. It seriously lacks secondary sourcing independent of the subjects origin and fails ](all five bullet points). Do we really need to see this relisted a fifth time? ''']'''] 14:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
			* '''Delete''' per Synergy. There is no assertation of notability, nor are there any reliable sources. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]• ] • ])</sup> 18:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


			:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 03:44, 7 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

InteLib (software library)

Non-notable programming library. Article probably created by the inventor, and all references are to his own works. Prod contested by author. BradV 16:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Weak Delete A quick search of Google Scholar and the ArXiv turn up no evidence of this library being used as the basis for further work. Googling on "Intelib" itself fails to turn up reliable source reviews, although it does seem to be a reasonably widely distributed library. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RayAYang (talk • contribs) 17:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 03:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Protonk (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Weak Delete per lack of notability. Artene50 (talk) 09:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sean Whitton / 12:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Delete this already. It seriously lacks secondary sourcing independent of the subjects origin and fails general notability(all five bullet points). Do we really need to see this relisted a fifth time? Synergy 14:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Delete per Synergy. There is no assertation of notability, nor are there any reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 18:19, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.