Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Animation Mentor: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:14, 25 July 2008 editDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,847 editsm cat← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:18, 23 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep''' based on and located sources. Content issues can be solved outside of AfD. &mdash; ]'']'' 15:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

===]=== ===]===
{{ns:0|O}}
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}


:{{la|Animation Mentor}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Animation Mentor}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
A private animation school. This is almost identical to a previous version deleted as spam and created by ] who has been identified as a for-profit spammer. &mdash; ] (] | ]) 00:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC) A private animation school. This is almost identical to a previous version deleted as spam and created by ] who has been identified as a for-profit spammer. &mdash; ] (] | ]) 00:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Weak keep''' because of , and , all of which turned up in a Google News search Not entirely convinced but I think it might pass. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]• ] • ])</sup> 00:54, 25 July 2008 (UTC) *'''Weak keep''' because of , and , all of which turned up in a Google News search Not entirely convinced but I think it might pass. ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]• ] • ])</sup> 00:54, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Strong keep'''. What screams out at me on this one is the affiliation with ], the awards, and the alumni (those of which need articles). It needs to be cleaned up, but spammers are not always a reason to delete. This seems legit, and the otters diff's above seal it for me. I recommend cleanup and additional citations for further verification be added to the article. Passes notability with flying colors. ''']'''] 14:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC) *'''Strong keep'''. What screams out at me on this one is the affiliation with ], the awards, and the alumni (those of which need articles). It needs to be cleaned up, but spammers are not always a reason to delete. This seems legit, and the otters diff's above seal it for me. I recommend cleanup and additional citations for further verification be added to the article. Passes notability with flying colors. ''']'''] 14:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

* '''rewrite or delete''' subject is fine, the article is not. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 20:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' meets the notability guidelines. ] (]) 20:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. I've done some cleanup (I still question the long section listing the credentials of the co-founders, but I've deleted my share of PRcruft, so I'm stopping); I too dislike how the article came about, but I think the notability (and sources) are there. -- <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">] </span> ] 01:30, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 15:18, 23 April 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep based on article improvements and located sources. Content issues can be solved outside of AfD. — Scientizzle 15:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Animation Mentor

Animation Mentor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A private animation school. This is almost identical to a previous version deleted as spam and created by Mrtriviamaniacman who has been identified as a for-profit spammer. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 00:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak keep because of this, this and this, all of which turned up in a Google News search Not entirely convinced but I think it might pass. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 00:54, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Strong keep. What screams out at me on this one is the affiliation with Sony Pictures Imageworks, the awards, and the alumni (those of which need articles). It needs to be cleaned up, but spammers are not always a reason to delete. This seems legit, and the otters diff's above seal it for me. I recommend cleanup and additional citations for further verification be added to the article. Passes notability with flying colors. Synergy 14:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.