Misplaced Pages

:Files for deletion/2005 September 3: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:04, 8 September 2005 editPsychonaut (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,685 edits →September 3: Rebuttal of Jeremy's nonsense← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:40, 11 March 2009 edit undoUncle G's major work 'bot (talk | contribs)51,901 editsm moved Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion/2005 September 3 to Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2005 September 3: IFDTOFFD: new name for sub-page 
(40 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==September 3== ==September 3==

* ] OR, NS --] 04:35, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
* ] OR, NS --] 04:35, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
* ] OR, NS --] 04:35, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
* ] OR, NS --] 04:35, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
* ] OR, NS, UE, AB ] 04:45, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
* ] OR, NS ] 04:47, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
* ] OR, NS ] 04:51, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
* ] - bad title. Appears on band vanity article ], currently on ]. &mdash;] ] 07:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] - OB by ], now OR. ] 09:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
* ] : use on Commons (I already fix article ])
* ] OR, OB by ], same content --] 11:23, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
* ] Untagged. Not showing Misplaced Pages main page. --] 12:18, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] - Untagged. Already has screenshot of Fedora Core. --] 12:23, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR --] 12:30, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, UE, AB ] 13:50, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB ] ] 13:54, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS ] 13:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*], ], ], removed by others from article ], all OR, ] 15:01, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
**Because both of the current images on the article are unsourced, and the first and third that you listed for deletion are fair use cover scans, perhaps we should first check to see if the former can actually be used before the latter are deleted as unnecessary? No opinion on your second listing. ] 06:04, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
*] Replaced this image in article ] with ] ] 15:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
** Could someone please explain what's the reason in replacing a fair use image with another one, fair use too, and ask for the deletion of the former? ] 00:06, 5 September 2005 (UTC) My vote is '''keep''', unless we're provided with a reasonable explanation. ] 14:46, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
**] is a technically better image then ], which is off color, grainy and slightly out-of-focus. The composition is not as good since it is a profile, but the image quality makes up for it (In my opinion). Which ever image is utimately chosen for use, the other should be deleted. --] ] 15:20, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
*] and ] OB by ] ] 15:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, AB ] 15:32, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR ] 15:35, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB by ] ] 15:39, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, AB ] 15:42, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS ] 15:48, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] and ] OB by ] ] 15:52, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*]: Asssociated with ], which appears to be heading for deletion on ]. ] 16:07, September 3, 2005 (UTC)

:* '''Keep''' Please don't say what you don't know to be true. '''Zap''' is quite healthy, thank you; and this nomination is very rude. This image is a redirect target, and for technical reasons alone, must not be deleted. &mdash; ]]]] 22:11, 2005 September 3 (UTC)
:*Should meet '''the same fate as ]''', whatever that may be. Probably deletion, although I think it should be kept. ~~ ''']''' (]/]) 00:47, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
:*'''Delete'''. ] proposal was thoroughly rejected by the community and considered a good-faith proposal of a plainly bad idea. So we won't need this image. ]]] 08:13, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
::*But if the proposal is kept (which I suspect it will be, by no consensus), then this image should still be around to illustrate it. '''Disk space is cheap.''' ~~ ''']''' (]/]) 21:00, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
:*'''Keep''' or '''move to Commons''' free-license images created by Wikipedians. &mdash;] ] 17:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
:*'''Delete''': A comment on ] says redirects to images do not work, thus making the intended use of this image not possible. --] 20:24, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

:*'''Delete''': as per Cesarb. ]]] (]) 21:00, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' for archival purposes. ] (]) 01:05, September 5, 2005 (UTC)

*Photos uploaded by ], all OR and tagged as fair use:
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (] and ])
**] (] and ])
**]
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (]
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
**] (])
:] 16:12, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] Replaced this no source image in article ] with promo photo ] ] 16:34, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, AB ] 16:37, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, UE ] 16:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, AB ] 17:03, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, AB ] 17:03, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] and ] OB by ] ] 17:09, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB ] ] 17:10, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB by ] ] 17:14, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB by ] ] 17:17, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
* NS Images from article ] that is a strong candidate for deletion --] 17:47, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
**]
**]
**]
**]
**]
*OR, NS image by AB ] --] 18:03, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
**]
**]
**]
**]
**]
**]
**]
*] OR ] 18:07, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB by ] --] 18:11, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB by ] --] 18:17, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, AB ] 18:20, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB by ] --] 18:24, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
* ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] -> they all are '''outdated''', OR, and OB ] 18:25, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

** '''Keep''' all these Lithuanian maps. They provide valuable information about former administrative boundaries, and should be found in articles concerning the history of the administrative areas or the former areas themselves. There is no reason to delete them. ] 18:46, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
**'''Delete''' Misplaced Pages is not a repository of images. If these images are encyclopedic, then they need to be linked to a relevent article. <small>written by Nv8200p</small>
**'''Comment''' - yes, these are maps, and even could be called "historical," however there is no need for these individual maps. One map showing all old counties is more than enough. Also they are very confusing and will lead to many misunderstandings. ] 03:22, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

* ], CV, copied from -- ] 18:57, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, UE, AB? ] 19:38, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS ] 19:48, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB by ] &mdash;] (]) 19:55, September 3, 2005 (UTC)<br>
The new image is better quality then the one I had, so it's fine by me to delete that image. ] 02:36, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS and also redundant as ] already existed. ] 20:03, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, UE, AB ] 20:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, UE, AB ] 20:05, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, UE, AB ] 20:08, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OB by ] --] 20:11, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR ] 20:15, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*Images uploaded by ]; there may be more. —] 21:31, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
**] - '''UE'''
***'''Keep'''. This image is for my user page. ] 20:53, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
**] - '''UE''' '''CV'''
**] - '''UE'''; user could just as easily have used Unicode text for this
***'''Keep'''. No, I couldn't have. ] 20:53, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
****That's odd; I can reproduce it just fine in Unicode: <span style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size:36pt; color: #ba983e; background-color: #336666;">ᛃᛖᚱᛖᛗᛃ ᚺᚨᚾᛊᛟᚾ</span> —] 10:04, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
**] - obsoleted by ]
**] - '''UE'''
**] - '''UE''', '''CV'''
**] - '''OR''', obsoleted by ]
**] - '''UE''' '''OR''' '''CV'''
**] - '''UE''' '''OR''' '''CV'''
**] - '''OR''' obsoleted by ]
***'''Keep'''. Um... Don't you mean ] is obsoleted by ]? ] 20:53, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
***No, because that would be untrue. '''Delete''', orphan. &mdash;] ] 21:42, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
**] - '''OR''', duplicate of ]
***'''Keep'''. Really? ] doesn't even exist. ] 20:56, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
****Of course ] doesn't exist. We're talking about ]. —] 10:04, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
***'''Doesn't matter''', it's on the Commons, not here. &mdash;] ] 21:42, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
**] - '''OR''', obsoleted by ]
***'''Keep'''. Yeah? And who exactly obsoleted it? You. You could have uploaded a new JPG image over the old one, but instead you decide to make a new title and thus erase my contributions from the history of Misplaced Pages. ] 21:06, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
****I think you failed to read the relevant edit summaries, Jeremy. Images comprised of text and other line art should be ]s, not ]s. —] 10:04, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
***'''Delete''' per nom. Different format images can't be obsolesced in-place. &mdash;] ] 21:42, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
**] - '''OR''', obsoleted by ]
**] - '''UE''', '''OR''', '''CV'''
**] - obsoleted by ]
***'''Keep'''. My image came first. ] should be re-uploaded under the title of "]". ] 21:06, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
****Your image is also smaller, blurrier, and has one-third the colour depth of ]. —] 10:04, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
***'''Delete''', CV. Orphans are never fair use. &mdash;] ] 21:42, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
**] - '''UE''' (we already have an image of this character), '''CV'''
***'''Keep'''. A completely different image. This is fair use, and thus, not a copyvio. ] 21:06, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
***'''Delete''', orphans are never fair use. &mdash;] ] 21:42, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
**] - '''UE''', '''OR'''
**] - '''OR''', obsoleted by ]
*] OR --] 22:26, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR --] 22:49, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
**'''Keep''' - This image is used for comparing the '']'' version of Super Mario Bros. 3 with the original NES/Famicom version.
**How would anyone know? The image is an orphan. --] ] 02:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR --] 22:52, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] -- poor quality drawing, does not (in my opinion) meet even the minimum standard for use as an article illustration. -- ] 23:09, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, OF ] 23:16, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS, UE ] 23:18, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] and ] OB by ] --] 23:43, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR --] 23:47, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
*] OR, NS --] 23:49, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:40, 11 March 2009

September 3