Revision as of 02:53, 31 July 2008 editGlassCobra (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers29,827 edits →Pudge!: <- cmt← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:54, 13 December 2024 edit undoMyotus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,046 edits →Wednesday, January 15, 2025 Minnesota User Group Meeting and 2025 Misplaced Pages Day Celebration: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{{icon|]}}}'''Wait! Are you here because your article was ] deleted? ] before leaving a message to find out why.''' | |||
{{talkheader}} | |||
{{User:Keeper76/header}} | {{User:Keeper76/header}} | ||
---- | ---- | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
|maxarchivesize = 250K | |||
|counter = 10 | |||
|algo = old(48h) | |||
|archive = User talk:Keeper76/Archive %(counter)d | |||
}} | |||
{| style="background:none; width:40%" align="right" | |||
{| style="background:none; width:100%" align="right" | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
== Happy holidays! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: 20px; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Happy Holidays!''' | |||
|- | |- | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hope you and your family are enjoying the holiday season! Pity about the Vikings. ] <sup>]] ]]</sup> 00:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC) | |||
|{{shortcut|WP:AN/K}} | |||
'''Instructions for using the Keeper-pedia/WikiKeeper'''<br /> | |||
<small>as written by ] & ]</small> | |||
#Embrace the edit conflict, for happen it will. | |||
#Leaving a comment for Keeper doesn't mean that it will be Keeper who answers it, although he'll try. See #1. Make new friends you will. | |||
#Save the drama for your mama. Everyone (mostly) gets along here. | |||
#If American, you must be a baseball fan. Doesn't matter which team(s) as it's almost guaranteed someone will razz you on it. May apply for all sports{{vn}} | |||
#If you have edited here at least 10 times, you are a ]. Especially if you've edited here at least 10 times responding to another stalker instead of to Keeper. | |||
#Be prepared for unexpected topic changes. ''"Has anyone noticed that only on this page can you begin talking about creating a Geo list and then start talking about....lets see- we have gas prices, ancestry, pants, pant sizes, mean names, weight, metabolism, obesity, and all the rest? Wow!! I would say more, but I'm about to die of laughter."'' --] | |||
#Somewhat related, you may, at times, feel as if you are ]... | |||
#It will eat your watchlist, but that's a far more pleasant sight than drama and AfD arguments and other debates. | |||
#Feel free to add more instructions/rules here for Keeper-pedia... | |||
|} | |} | ||
__TOC__ | |||
{{-}} | |||
==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
== This project is wearing on me == | |||
] | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 01:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
Could someone take a look at ] and close it? We have an editor who hadn't even participated in the discussion and debate that is reverting our consensus-based resolution. I'm really weary of all this stuff. ] ] ] 01:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:I'm not convinced it should be closed. ''']''' '']'' 01:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
::Oh my god, I'm done. LOOK AT THE FLIPPING DISCUSSION!!! There's no real dissent there. ] ] ] 01:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Stay calm. One RfD is not a big deal. The discussion started recently. Recommend you withdraw it instead of closing it. As you nominated it in the first place, you can simply withdraw your request. Let me know if you would like for me to do it for you. ''']''' '']'' 01:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Please do. That guy has stomped into the discussion and raised the OMGDRAHMA quotient with his reversions. I'm officially withdrawing it. And redirecting the page to the article space the rest of us (save that one guy who reopened it) agreed it should go. ] ] ] 01:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Speaking of drama... ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 01:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Would someone just withdraw it already? I'm not sure how to do it, and that would end that guy's crusade to keep it open against consensus. ] ] ] 01:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::{{done}} ''']''' '']'' 01:33, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Thanks. I've removed the tag from the redirect, and the drama should be over now. Unless he reverts ''you'' now, that is... ] ] ] 01:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::When I closed it, I posted on his talk page. It should put an end to this. Sorry about the delay. I was editing something else and I didn't immediately notice your acceptance of my offer to close it. In the future, don't let something minor like an RfD get under your skin. I would suggest dumping the responsibility on someone else (feel free to try me in the future) and moving on to another area, if it bothers you that much. Happy editing! ''']''' '']'' 01:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
*This is the first time I've really experienced something like this, where I worked with a group for consensus, reached a "best interests of the project" solution, and someone went to battle with me over it. Does this happen a lot? ] ] ] 01:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:*I haven't seen it, myself. Unusual situation there. ''']''' '']'' 01:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::*Since the argument primarily centered on ]'s !vote, I think the best course of action would have been to ask his opinion on your new proposal and whether he would be amenable to the retarget. A lot of heat could have been avoided. Arguing over someone else's opinion is fruitless when you can get it straight from the horse's mouth. Regards, ''']''' '']'' 02:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::*I thought I left a note at all three of the other editors that had participated (Ned Scott came by later) to ask about it. Perhaps I missed his talkpage ] ] ] 02:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::*Ah yes, I see the note now. I would have worded it differently, considering that the whole reason closure was being resisting was ''his'' !vote, but it's water under the bridge. We can all learn from this. ''']''' '']'' 02:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
*Ugh, reopened ''again'', this time by Rossami. I'm convinced it should be closed, but I'm not going to edit war over it. ''']''' '']'' 05:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:*I commented there. Let it run out, everyone (I presume) has had a full night's sleep now, the community will get it right. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 15:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:*This is pretty ludicrous. Everyone is commenting that the new redirect is fine. What's the ] of continuing it, really? Good grief! ] ] ] 23:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::*Even Pmedema: "I would say that if there is two more editors that agrees with the new redirect, it can be closed as a WP:SNOW." We have those two editors. I think it should be closed. ''']''' '']'' 23:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::*Agreed. Would you mind finding someone uninvolved that would take a look and close it? (TPSers, you out there?) ] ] ] 00:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::*You know, it didn't used to be hard to find people here. :) ''']''' '']'' 01:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Maybe it's because there are people showing up to '''oppose''' RfAs per "too many posts at Keeper's talkpage" ... ;) ] ] ] 22:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::*Closed again. :) ''']''' '']'' 22:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::And closed correctly this time. SDJ, you made very good points there, came up with a workable solution (I believe mostly with Skomorokh), but need to realize that there are processes (and the inevitable process wonkery) that often precludes common sense, right or wrong. RfD is full of it, and full of them. Always remember that "today's newspaper is tomorrow's litterbox liner". Nothing was at the "emergency level" here. If someone "undoes" a close of yours, WRITING IN ALLCAPS rarely helps move things along. Just let them undo, apologize even if you disagree, and work within the process. If Misplaced Pages is stressing you out, perhaps you need to remember that the pay here sucks, and there is absolutely ''nothing'' here worth getting stressed about. Nothing. That was definitely one of those "walk away" situations for everyone involved. It always seems to work out how it's supposed to in the end, we're smart people. It would've worked out the same way even without you getting stressed. Cheers, ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
== Any plans? == | |||
] | |||
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 05:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
*Where are you old boy? Hope all is well. –]] 05:42, 1 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
Ohai Keeper. I was wondering if you had any plans for an editor review on me soon. But it's no rush really. By the way, it seems . :P He promised to review me because he saw the thread on your talk page from last time. Thanks, ] (''''']''''') 18:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I second the above. but i have lots of time. <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="chocolate">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="bistre">]</font></sub> 18:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I seem to recall in which Keeper said, ''"Gentlemen, I'm likely not going to have time for this this week after all, and apologies for that RyRy, because I told you to remind me. I'll be on wiki most likely, but the energy needed to do a proper ER is just not appealing to me at the moment. Don't take it the wrong way. You're both great, you're both doing good things, and you both need to stop spamming me to review you, it's offputting."'' ::Might be worth taking into account. When I get hounded to review someone (not you, RyRy, to my knowledge you've never asked me to) it often does not reflect favorably in my review because it speaks to the user's patience, an important quality in lots of things in life, including adminship. Oh and Keeper? I *hate* the ESPN announcers. Hate hate hate. "Feenway Park" really? Joe Buck, you've killed the pleasure from enough games, you don't know the name of the Stadium? <font face="Verdana"><font color="Blue">]</font></font> 02:48, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::I watched the first four innings. On the graphic of the Yankees layout at the beginning of the game, the pitcher was "Pavano". Great job as always, ESPN. ''']''' '']'' 02:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Pavano, Ponson. Hey, they both start with "P", right? ESPN is pathetic, they make Fox look good. That said, I'll take 2/3 and put the game on mute. <font face="Verdana"><font color="Blue">]</font></font> 03:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Yeah, I figure ESPN was going by the theory that all that matters is the first letter. It was particularly funny because... '''Pavano'''? You mean the guy that threw like 112 innings in four seasons for the Yankees, while chewing up huge amounts of salary? Why is that name even in the rotation? Erase the name from baseball except in the history of biggest wastes of money ever. Anyway, I don't particularly like either team, but tonight's onslaught, I expected. Ponson simply isn't any good (Pavano would've been a better choice, heh), and the Red Sox have always owned him. Now we wait and see if the Washburn deal gets done. ''']''' '']'' 03:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Well said Travellingcari. Especially the part about the ESPN announcers. And the stuff about editor reviews....] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Shockingly, Pavano is . Yeah, I'll believe it when I see it too. Ponson is hit or miss, he's done OK since Yankees got him for essentially nothing. Sox were due. They fiddled the rotation tonight, I'm hoping to see!] Thursday, I like him but I want to see someone else. <font face="Verdana"><font color="Blue">]</font></font> 00:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
*Ditto. I miss AN:K ] 02:55, 12 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
== Attention stalkers (especially admins) == | |||
:"Old Boy?" Oy, looks like I was gone a bit too long this time, lulz. I can't haz adminz. I remember back in the dusty days of 08-09 when it was fiercely debated (citation needed) whether admin rights could be stripped. I was adamantly opposed to indefinite admin rights and thought they should retire with inactivity. Glad to see that is what's happening! In brighter news, the Twins are above .500, all is well in the world. Thanks for stopping by Xeno and TC. :-) ] | ] 00:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
When you speedily delete a page that has NOT been tagged, what templates do you use to notify the creator of the page? I'd like to alert them that I just deleted their work ] but I haven't found the right templates for it. <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] {{!}} ]</span></small> 15:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Always good to see your name pop up on my watchlist, even if it's just to say that you still don't want to hang out with us anymore. --] (]) 01:39, 2 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
:If I delete something without a tag or prior warning, I try my best to notify the user with real words instead of a template (and I don't think there is one anyway, nothing I've been able to find). Ironically, when someone tags something for speedy, they notify the author, but it's usually deleted before they see there talkpage anyway, we have loads of CSD clearing admins right now, ''rarely'' a backlog of more than 10-20 articles and images. So I wouldn't worry too much about the template, just a note to the author, with an offer to help them if they feel it was an incorrect deletion for whatever reason. For deletions that I do as a result of someone else's tag, I have also linked authors to my ] that explains why, and how to get it back. Feel free to create your own subpage if you want, just be sure to give ] much deserved credit. The very first line of my userpage/usertalk is a link that says "Did I delete your page? Click here!" As a result, I get very few repetitive inquiries from "newbie authors" because of that well-worded (not my words) subpage. Hope this all helps! ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::I'm afraid I'm just that kind of guy, Floq. Although, in my current state of nostalgia digging through my talkpage archives from the past year, I found the nuke/don't nuke discussion for ]. Some kind words were said there and I had a good chuckle. I can't believe I started gnoming about in this place coming up on 10 years ago. Good times! Be well - ] | ] 01:44, 2 May 2017 (UTC). | |||
::::You too. --] (]) 02:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
::::::Surely there are some twins articles that need some fluffing/protecting/zhuzhing/admin stuff is easy for any one with common sense....but srsly hope all is well... ] (] '''·''' ]) 02:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
:::::::"Dusty" days or ] days? ;) <3 <span style="font-family: MV Boli;">]]</span> 06:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
So glad to see you pop up in my watchlist, and glad I had my monthly ish check in to see this. Twinkies above .500 and Vikes have a QB. Crazy season in St. Olaf! Hope you're well. AN:K and the current state of the White House. Oof ] 03:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
== AN/I said this wasn't important enough.... == | |||
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
{{resolved|without keepervention - nice work TPS ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
...but I'm still disturbed by it so I'm bringing it to AN/K. | |||
There's this user ]. His user page is just the weirdest frickin' thing. It's not horrible or anything, but I don't think it's got any WP value at all..and his whole edit history--as well as the edit history of his logged-out IP ]--consists of one of two things: either a)edits to this weird-ass user page, or b)addition of deliberate and subtle errors to articles about TV shows/networks. I found a single legit edit, under another IP ]--the ] edits. But that's it, and most of the rest of what he spends his time on here is this "God's People/Pets" thing. He doesn't seem to answer questions on his talkpage, either. | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Keeper76. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
I know I'm being weird, here, but...seriously. Something about this smells really odd to me. Thanks!!] 16:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
:This freaks me out. <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="chocolate">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="bistre">]</font></sub> 16:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
::This is odd, 70% of the logged in users' edits are to userspace. If he keeps on editing without replying to messages on his talkpage, block as having no use to Misplaced Pages whatsoever...? Unless someone can find some incredibly impressive article contributions <tt>;)</tt> <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">]</span></b></small> 18:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
::::On the contrary--all but one of the other edits I've found among this user and IP's (probably him logged out) have been vandalism. ] 20:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=813406902 --> | |||
:::Yeah, this is just... odd. I agree that this wasn't really a matter for AN/I as he doesn't seem to have done anything blatantly ''wrong'', it's just extremely ''weird''. ~ <font color="#228b22">]</font> <sup>] | ]</sup> 18:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
*] seems to apply here. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 19:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
*This seems kind of ... well ... creepy to me. Is this user communicative at ''all'' about what the hell he's trying to accomplish with that userpage? ] ] ] 19:15, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::possibly MfD is the place to discuss it. ''']''' (]) 22:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
*eh, with all the personal information (birth dates) disclosed, it should be speedied under some applicable criteria and oversighted. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 22:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Sent this page to MfD ] (]) 22:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Thankfully deleted by Nichalp. He did say that it doesn't qualify for oversight because there's no personally identifiable information present. ''']''' '']'' 09:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::That I don't get at ''all''. If those are real people, there were names and DoBs. ] ] ] 13:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== |
== It's been a good ride == | ||
Maybe not a wild one. It's been 10 years since you gave encouragement to me when I first started editing. I've never forgotten your kindness and good advice. Take care. --] (]) 01:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
{{resolved}} | |||
:Hey Rexx - thanks for stopping by once again! 10 years, really?? Gosh. I thought I was an old guy back then, what does that make me now? ] | ] 04:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
Hi there is an IP address probably from India which is wreaking havoc with some of the Bollywood articles. See . He persistently keeps adding POV to an article or glorifying an actor or film further than they or it actually is. It is a major nuisance for the editors on here who work on Indian cinema articles to have to keep reverting him day in day out just to maintain some sense of article neutrality. Could you please warn him and try to make him aware of wikipedias neutrality and why his edits which are intent on putting POV or glorifying the subject of the article unnecesarily may be construed as agains tpolicy and therfore vandalism. Its doing my nut it keeoing track of him. User:Shshshsh (Shahid) raise my awarenss of it initially and other editors such as totalfilmi99 have to keep reverting him e.g . Should he be blocked do you think? ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 09:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I'll take a look today Blofeld. Sorry for the slow response (Why aren't the TPS-ers taking the hard ones? Hmmm..., ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Didn't go fast enough, oops! Tan blocked after AN post by Baldy. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 17:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Vikings in the playoffs == | |||
== Table of reliable sources for the names of the bits of the United Kingdom == | |||
I'd say I'd root for them for your sake, but I'm committed to the Jags' bandwagon. What a weird season. ] 03:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Hi there, a while back, you did excellent work in carrying out some informal mediation on ] about how to name the various bits of the United Kingdon. Part of your solution relied on a table of reliable sources that had been constructed on my initiative and placed in ]. Since then, there has been numerous changes made to the table and its place, so that now its present version lies in ]. There is now a suggestion that it be removed entirely! Since your solution to the Wales problem relied on the presence of the table, I wonder if you could consider the issue of removal of the table? You can see the discussion on ]. Thanks. ] ] 14:04, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
: |
:I'm almost ready to talk about that game. Almost. Go Twins! ] | ] 04:37, 17 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
::Minnesota Miracle! Alas I was rooting for them in the following game because #Beagles. Hope you're well. ] 15:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
:::Everything about ] was horrible and terrible and horrible. At about 1:30 left, a non-football-literate friend of mine asked why the Vikings were using their timeouts at that particular juncture. I then proceeded to explain roughly how the game would go on to end. :-( ] <sup>]] ]]</sup> 00:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
:::: Why did I think you were a Pats/Sox fan, Ed? The terrible, horrible, no good, very bad games were the two that followed. ] 02:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
== |
==Hi== | ||
You around? —<span style="font-size: 104%; letter-spacing:1.5pt;"><span class="monospaced" style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran]</span></span> 00:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
:No ] | ] 04:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
::Nine years since I became an admin, Keeper. Nine! ]<sup>]</sup> 00:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
:::I just hope I dont have to put {{tl|not around}} on your talkpage :)<br />—<span style="font-size: 104%; letter-spacing:1.5pt;"><span class="monospaced" style="font-family: monospace, monospace;">usernamekiran]</span></span> 14:04, 2 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
:::: :) ] | ] 02:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Happy football season == | |||
:Remember ? My quote? You called it quote of the day. Will you add it to your funnies. <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="chocolate">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="bistre">]</font></sub> 19:13, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Keeper, you there? <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="chocolate">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="bistre">]</font></sub> 14:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::imo, that joke needs too much context to be included on a funny page like that. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 14:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::no, just put ''Shapiroa10, talking about a children's TV show''. <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="chocolate">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="bistre">]</font></sub> 14:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Hey Shap, I add things to my funnies page when the mood strikes me. You'll notice that virtually everything added there by me are added within hours (if not minutes) of when they actually occur. You're quote was funny, in an ironic way, and truly made me LOL when I read it, enough so to actually respond to it telling you it was funny. But I didn't add it to the funnies page, didn't occur to me. I think probably Xeno is right, too much context. Not to worry though, it's still in my archives where you found it. Cheers, ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Eh, shoulda known it wasn't funny. <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="chocolate">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="bistre">]</font></sub> 14:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Oh stop. I'm trying to read some article talk pages to solve content disputes and the orange message bar keeps popping up for this. ''This'' thread isn't funny, the other one was. Please let it go, Sam. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Let's go Giants! Hope you're well, friend ] 23:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
== RFA thankspam == | |||
:Hey {{u|Star Mississippi}}, good game yesterday, eh? ;-) ] <sup>]] ]]</sup> 15:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
::This team is insane. You have a crap pass D, and we run. Luckily I like Brees, but I have no idea how he didn't light up Giants' D ] 01:54, 6 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
Thanks for your effective co-nom in ]. I must say, while I was pretty sure you would support me, I was not expecting such a, um, vehement support. I humbly thank you, and I hope that it is possible for me to live up to such a tremendous statement. | |||
:::Are you done with Eli yet? Saquon looks high potential. OBJ looks like a diva. I'll take my Diggs/Thielen/Cousins trio any day over the mess in NY. Good to hear from you as always Star! ] | ] 01:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
]]] 20:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Well earned! As you had approximately 3.5 times the amount of support that I did in my RfA, I fully expect you to be 3.5 times more efficient, more prolific, and more smarter than me. The last one shouldn't be too hard :-) ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Football.... == | ||
If you surface in the next fortnight or so and feel like some light reading, have a look at ] as gridiron is not my area of expertise by any means.....] (] '''·''' ]) 21:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
Hi yes I've been trying to get hold of people for numerous reasons but many people seme to be away. Yes he has just been blocked. Hope you had a good break. I also needed your help with moving some pages for the centrla american countries but thats also been sorted now. Sometimes I could really use the tools!! ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 17:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I can help on the football side if someone can walk me through FAC or link a tutorial ] 01:53, 6 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
:Hey, I've offered to nominate. I'm no longer doing nominations, but I would gladly support your bid if you ever decide to go for it. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 17:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::A good way to start is to start reading and think, "is there anything about this that could be made better?" Essentially, an article should fulfil the ]. Have a look at ] though. There are not many American football articles that are Featured, so some more interest would be fantastic! ] (] '''·''' ]) 08:41, 6 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
Oh actually there was something else. See ]. There are many articles which are unnecessily ending in (town) or city. COuld you move them back to the plain names without the ending. The provincial name ends in Province anyway so naming something ... town is incorrect. E.g ] should be moved back to ] which is in ], Could you help? Evidence of this is buri or puri Chantha'''buri''' means town so that article at present is town town.]</span> <sup>]</sup> 17:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Wait, wait, wait. You want me, a diehard, pain-loving, heartbroken lifelong Vikings fan - to help you get a PACKERS article to FA status? Dream on, Cas :-) (and seriously, good work. I glanced at it, it looks very well written) ] | ] 01:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
:::::This should be like FB...and I can reply with an XD emoticon...oh wait....] | |||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
:I've done three: ], ], and ]. Click on those, see if they're going the right way now, I'll continue with your greenlight that they are now in the proper places. Has anyone warned the user that is improperly moving these? ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 18:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Keeper76. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
Yes thats perfect thanks. I don't know who moved them but the suffix was unnecessary. ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 18:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Great, I'll keep going, obvious need for cleanup here...] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 18:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
Many thanks. Yes I have no idea why he thought it was necessary. Hat notes can disinguish the difference anyway. I've somehow managed to notch up around 1000 edits adding templates I created and categories to all the municipalities in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras. Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama are next. When I've finished and done Mexico we should have every municipalitiy in central america undercontrol and order and in the position to expand some of these stubs which have been lying around since 2004. I;m leanring spanish so it is also a learning process. Yesterday I started ] and expanded ] by translating from spanish wikipedia! Central America is a grey area of wikipedia and there are some facinating places with rich histories and cultures]</span> <sup>]</sup> 18:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
:It certainly is, and there are some active editors like ] who may feel able to help. --] (]) 19:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=866998196 --> | |||
== Is it baseball season yet? == | |||
If you or Fritz or anybody wants to lend to Bald One a hand if you see ] I need to fill out the templates with the municipalities. Basically it is a cut and paste job from the respective department article and paste it into the template e.g like ]. I;m nearing the end of Honduras in terms of adding templates but Nicarague will be next. ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 19:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
It's the doldrums for this northerner. The ] found a spectacular way to grasp defeat from the claws of victory and missed the playoffs. In better sports, pitchers don't report for over a month. What to do. ] | ] 04:42, 12 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
:I have my hands full in other areas. Heck, there must be at least 2,457,231 editors I've not yet got around to being uncivil with. Just not enough hours in the day. :-( --] (]) 19:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:snowshoe? At least Ed will be happy - rooting for his boys and grateful to them for drop kicking the Beagles. Is your basketball team any good? Last I followed them,] was drafted. Hope you're well ] 04:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
::{{ping|Star Mississippi|Keeper76}} . ] <sup>]] ]]</sup> 02:37, 24 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
:::Ooh maybe I'll learn to ping now. Are you suing? <g> That was crazy ] 03:54, 24 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::{{ping|Star Mississippi}} The pings are so fancy, right? Much better than having to leave {{tl|talkback}} everywhere. No lawsuit from me, but next season could be rough. Literally the last chance, because there's no way they'll be able to meet Michael Thomas' asking price. (But they don't have a first round pick. Or third. Or fourth. Sigh.) ] <sup>]] ]]</sup> 06:11, 24 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::::{{ping|The ed17}} let's see if I did that right. Last year with Brees too, right or do you think he goes another year? Michael Thomas is fun to watch as is Kamara. Plus as a Giants' fan I'm duty-bound to love Ingram. Keep, hope you're thawed from this week's awful weather. ] 03:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
:::::::{{ping|StarM}} You did! It has to be the last year for Brees. After this, the salary cap will start catching up with them. Like, there's no way they can keep Thomas after his rookie deal is up, they're not exactly going to get a lot of low-cost drafted players this year, and there will be $10.5 million in dead money for Brees alone. ] <sup>]] ]]</sup> 04:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
::::::::{{ping|The ed17}} ooph, I feel you. Giants going to need rookie QB to come in Barkley year 3 to afford him, the QB and maybe OBJ. Although the cap has gone up, salaries have gone berserk. ] 19:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago == | |||
Thats great if you could lend a hand. Check my editing history over last two days its a monster!! I;ve just finished adding the templates to Honduras. If the Nicaraguan ones are waiting, after setting up the municipal categories by department it should be ready to plough through tomorrow. COsta Rica is going to be a biggy as we need templates not only for the provinces but for the individual cantons and is it quite developed on here. There are for example 10-16 cantons in a province on average, then each canton often has 20 districts/municipalities!! Soon enough all the central american places will have finoboxes and basic referenced data soon enough. ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 20:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{User QAIbox | |||
Perfecto amigo gracias. Eventually the tenplates will probably be fleshed out with articles on other topics related to them such as landmarks/history.people etc.But municipalities is all at present. ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 20:21, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| title = Awesome | |||
| image = Cscr-featured.svg | |||
| image_upright = 0.35 | |||
| bold = ] | |||
}} | |||
--] (]) 09:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC) | |||
... and ]! --] (]) 08:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
::I think they're done, I see you did the last few (started at the bottom). Phew! This is way way more article work than I'm used to. Refreshing :-) ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 20:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== May the 4th be with you == | |||
Cheers. I've just nabbed ] from spanish wikipedia. Once translated this is EXACTLY the sort of content I keep talking about that should be on here in detail for all these places rather than one line uncategorized sub stubs. ]</span> <sup>]</sup> 21:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Oh wow! That makes me wish I knew Spanish! (Beyond grade 9 mandatory). I can say Hola and Mucho Gusto. And Lo Siento. Other than that, I'm-o confused-o. Do you want me to add the province templates (the ones with municipalities) to the province articles? I noticed they weren't on there for the majority of them, probably because they (at the present) contain exactly the same amount of (non) material as the articles themselves. I can add them if you wish though, ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 21:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
and Yankees/Twinkies on our TVs. Hope you're well, Keep! ] 15:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC) | |||
== I keep missing the yellow bar... == | |||
:5 months (to the day!) later, and here we meet again! Hope you get to go to the stadium, I'm hoping to go for Game 3. Go Twins! ] | ] 23:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
::hah, clearly didn't look before I commented. Merging my note below into this section. I didn't make it, but hope to for ALCS if they make it. Too funny that we had a two sport rivalry weekend ] 21:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
=== it's officially the post season === | |||
wouldn't be without Yankees/Twinkes. Hope you're well ] 01:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
That is so bad, it's good. Thanks! That was awesome! ]]] 19:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Glad you liked that bit o' cheese. Made that up all by me-self, I did I did. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 20:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== A note of appreciation == | |||
oh memories. 12 years ago. How is that even possible?!?! ] 17:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
You'll never know how much you helped me at the worst moment of my life. You wrote on my talk page, and told me to say it out loud, '''''"I'm gonna be OK"'''''. I did that, and have been doing it daily ever since. You have made a profound difference in my life, and I did not want it to go unnoted. ] (]) 19:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Love ya, babe. Keep on keepin, and hit me up if you need anything at all of course. Wish I had email, but I don't, but if its something that you want dozens of editors to read (my talkpage is heavily watchlisted), please use my talkpage for absolutely anything at all! Be well Wiki-friend, ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 21:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Postseason baseball == | |||
== I need a GA mentor, or a volunteer PR'er == | |||
but is it really if the Yankees aren't playing the Twinkies? Hope you're well in this 2020 upside down land ] 22:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{resolved|this issue has been ] ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 00:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
Dear Keeper and associated TPS, would someone be willing to help me get an article to GA status? I promise to do all the work myself, but what I really need is a mentor who understands the process and expectations, who can give me detailed feedback iteratively as I integrate suggestions. I've got a couple of articles in mind (] and ]), but am willing to work on another article that reasonably interests me. i.e., I'm willing to work on an article of the mentor's choice in exchange for the associated education and training. Thanks! ] (]) 20:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:This is gonna hafta be a TPS request. I am so ridiculously "unqualified" to mentor anyone through the GA process, having never been through it myself. My first thoughts are Giggy and Malleus Fatuorum, maybe Sandy Georgia, Moni3. Not sure who can take on the workload, but I've seen these 4 be extremely helpful with GA/FA n00bs (heck, I might hit one of them up myself if I ever decide to actually write something :-) ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 21:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ]: May 14–16 == | |||
:(edit conflict)I reccomend ], who would probably bite your hand off if you offered to help him with some GA or PR work. '''''<font color="green">]</font><font color="blue">]</font>''''' 21:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
] | |||
The ] is holding online working days in May. As a member of ], editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months. | |||
We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities. | |||
::Giggy would be a good choice, he knows what he's doing. I've currently got my hands full ]. --] (]) 21:11, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
'''More information, and registration details, at <big>]</big>.'''--] 02:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
== This should answer all your questions == | |||
== Deletion review for ] == | |||
Hi - could take care of all of your questions. --] (]) 23:50, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{resolved|discussion closed}} | |||
:Bye. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 00:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote --> ] (]) 03:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
== Is it me... == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div> A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', an article that that you have contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
...or is Tangobot tallying RfA opposes slightly differently of late? <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] {{!}} ]</span></small> 00:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Tangobot won't tally the first oppose until there's a reply to or or another oppose. he's silly like that. I shall . –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 00:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::OK, I'm going to assume you're right...because you usually are. So that leads to the question: how do you ''know'' this stuff? (Do you have a life?) <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] {{!}} ]</span></small> 00:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::I can't help it if I'm brilliant ............ =] actually, to be honest, some user up for RFA figured it out, and I noticed them replying with placeholder comments to ensure tango properly tallied their RFA. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 03:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::But you're still not asserting that you have a life, I notice... ;-) <small><span style="padding:2px;border:1px solid #000000">] {{!}} ]</span></small> 03:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Guilty as charged =) I'm off for now. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 03:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 02:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
== A question about WikiProjects and BLP == | |||
== Take good care of Sanchez and Ursheia == | |||
Hi, Keeper. I'm hoping the admins that hobnob on your page an are learned in the ways of ] are able to give input to a situation. ] on the talk page for ] spawned a disagreement over the placement of ]' template on the article's talk page. Though Crist has been rumored to be gay (something I think is a political ploy), the template has been removed due to BLP concerns. Does merely the placement of a wikiproject template on a talk page have any bearing on information in the article? I posed the question at ], and I'm surprised it has gone unanswered. --] (]) 00:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Despite my prolifickness in jabber, I'm all about the sources. Are there any reliable, secondar sources that say that Mr. Crist is in fact gay, I can't imagine what appropriateness there would be for adding said person to the LGBT template. Do you have any sources? If so, I'll battle with you, if not, I can't do much... ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 00:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Needs to be a damn good source, too, I imagine. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 00:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Totally uninformed off the cuff remark (I know little to nothing about the BLP policy): the placement of the template doesn't necessarily mean the person is LGBT - the fact that he's a politician who is outspoken in support of laws that restrict LGBT from marriage, etc. would seem to put him under their purvey. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 00:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::(several e/c's)I was going to add, I'm not personally prejudiced one way or the other. Simply that I need to see reliable sources, not just speculation or accusation. If he is purported to be such, so be it, I'll add it myself. If not, I'll revert his page continually, with no hard feelings against those editors that feel the addition is necessary although illfounded. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 00:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::And to Xeno, the template in question, at least historically if I may be so bold, is for those that have either belonged, or explicitly supported, such a categorization as LGBT in person or in support of such. I need a reliable source to say that Crist specifically is such before I defend such an assertion. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 00:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
*yea, don't mind me, like i said, just shout outs from the peanut gallery here. my suggestions seems to have already been shot down, cf. ''Hurmata (talk) 18:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)''. As for the rest...]. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 00:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Crist has never admitted to being gay, and there are no 3rd party resources verifying that he is. As I said, I doubt that he is, and I think these are simply politically motivated rumors. However, that is not the only reason to tag an article's talk page. We have tagged Jesse Helms, Fred Phelps, and Jodie Foster. None of these people have admitted to being gay, but all have information in their article that is within the project's interest. My question, more to the point, is: does a talk page template violate BLP? The template itself does not say the subject is gay, just that the article falls within the scope of the project and accuracy of information in the article is a goal of WP:LGBT. --] (]) 00:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::I replied at Talk:Crist a bit more, but I still say without reservation that the "LGBT" tag carries more connotation to it than it should. Without verification, I strongly believe that the only articles that should carry the LGBT wikiproject tag are those that are either directly (or very closely indirectly) affected (or involved in) by the LGBT community. I don't believe, without reliable sources anyway, that Crist is a suitable candidate for the LBGT Wiiproject tag at this point. That, of course, could change tomorrow, depending on the reliable, independent sources that arise... ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 01:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I'm not an admin, but I'm going to go ahead and throw my two cents in. From what I can see, the LGBT tag isn't purely for people who identify as LGBT. ] has one, ] has one, ], ], and ] all have them. So there's plenty of precedent for having the template up on the talk page of people who aren't LGBT. I think if an office ticket was submitted by the Crist camp then it would be the right thing to remove it, but until then community acceptance seems to be on the side of letting the project tag go up wherever it wants to. A change to letting these articles be tagged would be something that should be sorted out at either the project page or a general discussion area (village pump, RfC, etc). ] (]) 01:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I need to disagree here, at least in respect to Crist. Unless a BLP explicitly supports, or is a part of, the LGBT community, I don't see what purpose, other than disparagement, the LGBT community would have for this particular BLP. Sources, sources, sources, people. Wikipedians, listen! Again, let me '''''adamanetly state''''', I'm explicitly '''''not''''' against adding this tag were appropriate, nor am I against said community. I merely feel that it needs to be applied sparingly and where necessitated. Crist, at this point, is not necessitated, only because it is at "rumor" stage, without any substantial sources to back up the claims. Please don't misconstrue this as being (personally) any way bigoted or close minded. It's a BLP, and I will defend '''''any''''' BLP, for the sake of the integrity of Misplaced Pages, regardless of my personal views or convictions. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 01:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::I think I may be a bit slow to respond because for some reason, this is getting my dander up. I don't like responding when I'm irked. So I'm going to reply when I feel all, you know, whatev. I want to make sure, however, the following is understood: 1) adding the tag does not state or imply that the subject is gay. True, some people may make that snap assumption, but the project cannot control what people infer despite cited fact in the article. 2) The comment "other than disparagement" is disconcerting. I can only speak for myself as a member of WP:LGBT in saying that only cited fact is what I'm interested in as a member of the project. I dislike that sexual orientation is used as political fodder, similarly to the Karl Rove-brainchild of calling voters in South Carolina and asking them if it would change their votes to learn that John Edwards had a mixed race child out of wedlock. He did not, but it's South Carolina, and just putting that idea in voters' heads had an adverse impact. Soon, a candidate may be accused of being gay and it will have absolutely no impact at all, because people simply won't care. Now, however, because Crist has been listed as a possible VP for John McCain, these rumors have emerged. If they are unfounded, I would like to make sure that the article reflects that. Ideally, all members of the project should have this goal in mind. Lastly, 3) I'm still having difficulty understanding how a template on the talk page violates BLP, which involves information on the article page. These two things are clearly separate in my mind. Is it that LGBT carries with it such an aura of... accusation? or guilt? that it's presence affects the contents of the article? If that is the case, is that the issue that WP:LGBT must overcome? --] (]) 01:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::<small>edit conflict x3</small>I do see where you're coming from, and I agree that BLP is one of if not the most important wiki rules, but I don't think the template implies that Crist is gay or an acceptance of gay rumors. If you look at the wide variety of people who have the tags, and the wording of the template itself, to me it doesn't say "we think Crist is gay" or any variant thereof. In my opinion projects should be given wide leeway in determining what's of interest to them, so long as the language of the template allows it. And don't stress! I don't what you're saying is at all anti-gay, just pro "do no harm." :) ] (]) 01:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:As Gov. Crist has not identified himself as gay, and as the allegations that he is gay are rooted solely from his political opponents (I looked this up), then it is inappropriate to have the WikiProject LGBT template on his Talk Page. Barbra Streisand and Paris Hilton have gone out of their way to market their recordings and appearances to the gay media, so having an LGBT template on their pages is not problematic (how come no one mentioned Liza?). But Gov. Crist has specifically denied being gay, so having the LGBT template makes no sense. After all, this is not Rumor-pedia. ] (]) 03:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
they'll be missed in pinstripes. Hope you and yours are well in these continued crazy times. Play ball! <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">] ]</span> 01:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
<--To Moni, I need to rephrase something. When I said "other than disparagment", I did not mean Misplaced Pages disparaging a BLP by adding a tag. I meant the BLP's political opponents attempting to disparage him in the eyes of his (presumably conservative) support base/voters. I wholeheartedly agree that such an "accusation" should not be "disparaging", but it is, unfortunately, disparaging to a large percentage of the American population. Because its a BLP, and ''only'' because it's a BLP, should we be extra careful and "do no harm". I'll go look at the article and sources, and I'm going to crosspost this on your talk to be sure you see it. My apologies if anything I'm typing is being misread, I sincerely am ''not'' trying to sound offensive, but my keyboard is having difficulty expressing my tone and finding the right way to say what I'm trying to say. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:A year to the day later! I found my password (and don't have a recovery email, so it was actually serendipitous...). Sanchez and Urshela both one-and-done, on to greener pastures. The Twins Way (tm). Never much cared for Gary. Gio was fun to watch. Hope you're well, TC! :-) ] | ] 23:38, 17 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for the response, Keeper. I understand. I think. Actually I'm not sure what's being said anymore. What seems like a very black and white situation: a template on a talk page having nothing at all to do with content in the article, is being construed in ways I never conceived. It's quite creative, actually, and had I no investment in it I might find it pretty entertaining. --] (]) 14:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::It only "seems" like a black and white issue, but it's really more of a greyish yellow-brown issue. Like the color of baby-vomit, really. One day, the world will pull its borg-like head out its ass and realize that it really isn't an issue at all, of any color. My sincere apologies to you Moni if I've caused any offense to you personally, or if you feel that I'm only feeding the negativity of the conservative viewpoints. I think, in the end, that the LGBT tag can be appropriate if that particular multi-viewpoint WikiProject feels that the article is worth including, for whatever reason. There need to be third party reliable sources (yes, even for the talkpage tagging for a BLP) that show how Crist is involved (even in a negative way) with the LGBT community. Forgetting the political mucky-muck for a sec - as a legislator/governor, has he done anything policy-wise that is of specific interest to WP:LGBT to include his article under its wing? I can see a justification for adding it, in similar fashion to adding it to Dubya/Dobson/other high profile conservative politicians/faces. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Ok. This is a fight that this project has had many times, and no doubt will have numerous times in the future. Right now, ] is open to interpretation, and WP:LGBT's goals and missions, according to these discussions on Charlie Crist, are being interpreted to mean that we are trying to impose an agenda of gay sexual orientation on the article and on Crist. This is not the case. We are trying to make sure accurate information is being presented in the article. What is very bothersome is that editors not involved in WP:LGBT are allowed to interpret what our intentions and goals are, and remove the tag accordingly. Moreover, we may be the only WikiProject whose appearance on a talk page carries with it POV, just by being there. I've stared at this paragraph for what seems 30 minutes. I don't know what to write anymore... I'm nonplussed. --] (]) 15:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::You realize, I sincerely hope, that I'm on your side of this particular issue. This keyboard is doing me injustice, I can't format my sentences properly. I'll try a ridiculously unrelated and inappropriate analogy. I wouldn't tag ] with ], even though most of the captial St. Paul is Irish and was built by the Irish. Why does this one particular article need the tag? What's the motivatioin behind it? There is nothing stopping you and every other editor from making sure that the article on a US governor is accurate, NPOV, sourced. Whether the talkpage is tagged or not. The fact that the LGBT wikiproject "carries with it POV", to use your words, is unfortunate, and wrong. I'll gladly (]) help clear that. I have no malice towards the WikiProject, I don't presume to know what the group's "intentions and goals" are, and if anything that I've stated otherwise was interpretted that way, let me know so I can strike it. I have no idea what the groups goals and intentions are, other than to work collaboratively to build a better encyclopedia like every other WikiProject. Also, I don't know what nonplussed means. And I'm not sure anymore what I think about any of this, but I highly highly respect you and the work you do here (for free) on Misplaced Pages and I'm going to stop responding for somewhere between 8 and 20 hours so that I can have a clear head. I don't want anyone to be angry at anything I post in regards to this subject or subject matter. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 15:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::I understand you're not against the project, I do. I wouldn't remove WP:Ireland from any project they think is under their scope. Using analogies, imagine if I removed WP:Military History templates because I think they can only come from a place of warmongering and hyperviolence. That their actions in the article will only lead to a bias. It would be stunning, would it not? Would that not get them upset? Why should I determine what articles are within their scope? Loopholes and problems like these call for clarity in policy. I despise the bickering and accusation that goes on on the ANI page about who's more offended that who, but this seems to me as if folks are neglecting to Assume Good Faith of an entire WikiProject. Why on earth would we tag an article if not to ensure it should have accurate information in it? | |||
:::::::A period of thought is probably called for. I would like to be able to proceed with something productive. If that means WP:LGBT should write out and have consensus from its project members about what falls under their scope for many editors to read, then I'll be happy to start that process. If BLP should be clarified, I don't know how to do that. If policy elsewhere should be clearer about AGF from a WikiProject, I don't know where to go for that or what to do. --] (]) 15:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Just to let you know == | ||
You have been added to Missing Wikipedians. ] (]) 13:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
:I miss me too. ] | ] 23:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
== "Mainstream (terminology)" listed at ] == | |||
Thank-you for your support of me at my ], which was successful. I have appreciated everyone's comments and encouragement there. ] <sup>]</sup> 03:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 07:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Hey there == | ||
I saw that you were removed from Missing Wikipedians. Glad to see you're still around, even if only for a little while! I hope life has been treating you well :) ] 02:59, 18 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
If you want to do something useful, ] would love a copyedit. Every FAC I promise myself I'll get through without asking someone to copyedit my weak prose, and FAC I realise I should have made this promise before starting. —''']''' 03:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:The key word in this post, is "if". That's a big "if". Not feeling overly useful ATM. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::OK then | |||
::Enjoy a half-arsed | |||
::] | |||
::(Anytime you feel up to it, I'll have an article ready - just say the word!) —''']''' 14:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
:AN/K is back, baby! - ] (]) 13:13, 18 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
As per your comments in closing the AFD on this, I have expanded the article with references. It's fair enough expecting the article to be expanded beyond one sentence, but it would be nice to see the serial deletionists occasionally encouraged to make a more constructive contribution to the project, rather than editors such as myself who go through AFD's and spend a few minutes trying to determine notability before commenting on them. Cheers.--] (]) 09:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I agree. I said "or any other editors", but you have to realize that asking a deletionist to expand an article is an exercize in futility, similar to attempting to nail jelly to the wall. Unless of course, that deletionist wrote the article in the first place and someone else AFD'ed it. Then, watch out, world, the allcaps are-a comin'. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Hi folks! I found my password so I could log in again. Don't know if I've found the passion for editing articles anymore, (who am I kidding? It was always all about the talkpages for me, I'm just glad I did my RFA before anyone really noticed how lame my contributions were lol). And I definitely haven't had the time from RL craziness. Hope you are both well, thanks for keeping ol' Keeper watchlisted. Keep those spammers away! I'll try to pop in now and then. And also, sweet JEEbus that RFA was like 15 years ago. Impossible. If I was old then, what am I now??? ] | ] 00:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
== RfB Thank You spam == | |||
:::] alerted me you were back. <big> HOW DARE YOU </big> abandon me? <span style="font-family: MV Boli;">]]</span> 15:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
<div style="float: left; border:solid green 1px; margin: 1px;"> | |||
{| cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" style=" background: #FFE4B5;" | |||
|style=" background: #FFE4B5; text-align: center;" rowspan="2" | ''']''' | |||
|'''Thank you for participating in my RfB!''' I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at ], which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please ]. Again, Thanks! <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|}</div> | |||
Hi friend. Wanted to be sure you saw this. What a huge loss and along with you, one of the first Misplaced Pages editors I knew. <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">] ]</span> 01:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Small Review Request == | |||
:Ugh, that's really tough news! I remember David being a calming and kind presence in whatever spaces he made an appearance. One of the good ones. ] | ] 00:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
::Absolutely. Such a presence in the best sense of the word. <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">] ]</span> 21:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
== Twinkies! == | |||
So, I've been working a lot on this ] article of late, and it's approved for DYK and should probably make its way to the front page in the not too distant future. I'm having some issues with the , and I've just reached the point where I've read so much about it and rewritten it so much that I can't even tell if it makes sense any more. Is there any chance Keeper or a TPS would be willing to read that section over and let me know what it looks like from the perspective of a new reader? Just basic things: does it flow logically? Does it explain what happened? Is there anything unclear or that you feel needs more information? Comments and edits on the rest of the article would obviously be welcome as well, but it's only the payments section that I'm truly freaking out over. ] (]) 12:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I'm reading this, have an idea, I'll be on your talkpage shortly! (The anticipation is killing you softly, init...] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Wow, first postseason series win since 2002. You're clearly good luck! | |||
== Haiku decline == | |||
No Love, The Stinkees. <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-weight:bold;">] ]</span> 18:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Wiki Uff Da! Editing the Misplaced Pages for Absolute Beginners == | |||
] –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 14:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Hilarity in the simplest form. <b><font color="Indigo">]</font> | <font color="MidnightBlue" size="1"><sup>]</sup></font></b> 14:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
{|style="background:#00000; border:1px solid #6881b9; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;" | |||
:Creative and clear | |||
|- | |||
:The best block decline, ever | |||
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|Wiki UFF DA! - Editing the Misplaced Pages for Absolute Beginners | |||
:Xeno rocks my world | |||
|- | |||
:] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| style="padding-left: .6em;" |] | |||
::=) –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 14:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::''Oh, you know, if it isn't just the most basic workshop ever needed, "Misplaced Pages Editing for Absolute Beginners" for those who haven't had the pleasure of diving into that simple process quite yet. Bless their hearts, they're just starting out, so we thought, why not put something together? Because, you know, it's not like it's rocket science or anything, but hey, we're always happy to lend a hand where we can. And just a little bit of Minnesota Nice to help along the way. 'Uff da!' you say? Well editing the Misplaced Pages is not hard at all!'' | |||
:::How long, oh how long | |||
:::Did it take you to write such | |||
:::a bad haiku, Keeps? —''']''' 14:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Join us at one of our three FREE workshops in Minnesota, where you can learn how to edit Misplaced Pages and add Minnesota's local history in a relaxed and supportive setting. Work alongside others and discover how easy editing Misplaced Pages can be. The workshops aim to enhance the ability of communities in Greater and rural Minnesota to edit Misplaced Pages and comprehend it's editing culture and guidelines, as well as to expand Misplaced Pages's coverage of Minnesota's history. | |||
::::If I remember | |||
::::Correctly, it took no time | |||
::::At all. Um. At all. | |||
::::(damn. I lose) ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 14:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
'''Already good at editing the Misplaced Pages? You're welcome to come and work on local history Minnesota Misplaced Pages articles alongside others.<br /> ]''' | |||
:::::A new thread on Keeper's talk brings a rush, | |||
:::::Edit conflicts galore in the crush, | |||
:::::They like blocking in verse, | |||
:::::Or AFD's with a theme (so much worse!), | |||
:::::Either way, AN/K, is enough to make MySpacers blush! | |||
::::::Limerick anyone? <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 15:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:There once was a fellow named Keep | |||
:Whose talk page was followed by sheep | |||
:It's no big surprise | |||
:When edit conflicts arise | |||
:And the rent is surprisingly cheap. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 15:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
'''''' to be included for lunch. | |||
]?. Nah, I prefer ]. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 15:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
'''Event 1 @ Morris, MN''' | |||
The user "Keeper76" | |||
* '''Date & time:''' Wednesday, October 23, 2024, 11 am to 4 pm ] | |||
* '''Location:''' West Central Minnesota Historical Center, McGinnis Room, Briggs Library, University of Minnesota-Morris, ] | |||
'''Event 2 @ Chisholm, MN''' | |||
He had a big bag of tricks | |||
* '''Date & time:''' Thursday, November 14, 2024, 11 am to 4 pm ] | |||
He was very popular | |||
* '''Location:''' MN Discovery Center, 1005 Discovery Drive, ] | |||
'''Event 3 @ Mankato, MN''' | |||
he had lots of stalk-u-lars (portmanteau of stalking and regulars) | |||
* '''Date & time:''' Wednesday, November 20, 2024, 11 am to 4 pm ] | |||
At his talk, you can get your kicks! | |||
* '''Location:''' Room 2057, 601 Maywood Ave, Memorial Library, Minnesota State University, ] | |||
Facilitator: ] | Joe Hoover | |||
These workshops are put on by the ] as part of their commitment to the Minnesota local history community and are led by . | |||
I'm awful. <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="chocolate">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="bistre">]</font></sub> 15:22, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
*] just threw up another nonsense unblock request if anyone wants to join the fun... or, if you're not that fun, just PP-usertalk the page =) –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 15:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::] (]) 21:05, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I'm afraid I took the business approach to this, and if he uses the template once more I'll protect the page. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 15:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::No problem. I was kinda leaning towards that being a better idea. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 15:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Some people appear | |||
:To have way too much time on | |||
:Their hands this fine day :-D ] (]) 15:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Eco: did you like mine? <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="chocolate">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="bistre">]</font></sub> 15:53, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Sam, did you know there were elephants in the Apocrypha? ] (]) 16:40, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== November 2024 Minnesota User Group Meeting == | |||
== No worries == | |||
{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #7fbaff; border: 2px solid #00FFFF; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );" | |||
Misplaced Pages's worth taking the trouble to make it better. We all do it. ] ('''<span style="background-color: white; color: blue">Go</span> <span style="background-color: blue; color: white">Colts!</span>''') 14:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <span style="font-size: 110%;">In the area? You're invited to the <big>''']'''</big></span> | |||
] | |||
== Just testing something == | |||
<div style="float:right; width: 75px; height: 60px;"></div> | |||
<hr style="border-bottom: 1px solid rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 );" /> | |||
for my dashboard. Wish I had a sockpuppet for this: | |||
{{center| <small>''The organizer of this soiree is Joe Hoover aka ] feel free to drop him a message. | |||
|}} | |||
{{tnull|adminhelp}} | |||
<hr> | |||
Okay its been a while since the Misplaced Pages Minnesota User Group has meet. Since the last time we meet there has been social upheaval, plague, etc... - no small thing to be sure. There has been some ] the Minnesota Meetup page on getting together but little action. So here it is. Come and be seen. Talk about the future of the Minnesota User Group and see what nefarious plans we can hatch. | |||
] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 17:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
<hr> | |||
'''Date''': {{{date|Sunday, '''November 3''', 2024}}}<br /> | |||
:Looks like it works. I can help out, if you need it - but you do show up in ], if that's what you're checking. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 17:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
'''Time''': {{{time|1 to 3:30 pm}}} (reminder - Daylight Saving Time ends)<br /> | |||
'''Place''': {{{place|'}}}<br>6031 Pillsbury Ave, Minneapolis, MN<br> | |||
::No, I'm just checking if my ] updates the "immediate request" box correctly and turns bright colors. The kind of help that this admin needs is not available on Misplaced Pages anyway...:-) ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 17:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
<hr> | |||
{{center | |||
:::Aha! Gotcha. I tried to get ] to highlight items requiring immediate attention, but ended up making a mess of it - so gave up. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 18:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <small>''Look forward to seeing folks!''</small> | |||
*Nice try trying to get a leg up on my dashboard, keep. Anyways, it should work now, . –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 18:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
|} | |||
**Pwned. Bitch. Too many edit conflicts here, I'll go play somewhere else :-) ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 18:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::] (]) 02:14, 22 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
***Follow the breadcrumbs from here: ] –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 18:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== All pages needing factual verification == | |||
That "verify" tag at the top of your page is making your talkpage show up in ]. Any way to fix that? ] <small>and his otters</small> • <sup>(]• ] • ])</sup> 18:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I like it. I'm definitely in need of factual verification. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 18:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::True though that may be... only thing I could suggest would be to subst the template and delete the category from the result - but it'd make that part of your talk page trickier to edit. Or you could just make it point to ]... ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 18:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Must...avoid...clicking...redlink.... ]]] 18:08, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::I really really want that category to stay on my talkpage, is that a huge problem? I don't want to be a dick about it, I just find it hilarious tis all, and very true. Read any day's worth of threads and you'll understand...] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 18:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::I'd really only see it as a problem if that category were ever not in a never-ending backlog. –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> 18:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::If my page ends up being the very last in the cat, I'll find a source to verify whatever needs to be verified, or remove the vn tag me-self. Until then, happy editing! ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 18:26, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Eh? == | |||
Can you explain to me what "Drive-by tagging" is and yet and ) is overlooked? I did make a courteous note on the talk page, and my views are supported by ]. I was about to make a second comment on ] and we edit-conflicted - I'm very surprised by the content of your message. <small>--<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;">] | ] </span></small> 21:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Matt Lewis' commentary is far ''far'' from ideal, and I apologize if you feel I was ignoring his tone. I personally agree that the lead has much to be desired, per LEAD (for example, all the freeking sourcing - I can't imagine how this would fare at GA let along FA). But for whatever reason, perceived or real, another editor feels/perceives that your tagging was done with less than stellar motives, and is doing a poor job of saying it. His edit summary sucked, his post on Talk:Wales was filled with accusation. He should apologize. I reverted you again because I simply honestly fail to see how "undoing" his revert of your edit and readding the template (disclosure, I ''detest'' all templates, they are distracting to our readers), when he is clearly upset by it, will somehow help alleviate the problem with the article and its lead. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 21:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Okie dokie - like I say, I was about to pass comment with a further, more detailed response about why I thought that tag was more than appropriate in this instance (pointing to WP:LEAD) but got edit conflicted with this. I felt (past tense) aggrieved that, objectively, I've done the right thing (IMO), and that you happen "detest all templates" has now given fuel to an out-of-control incivility-fire. Oh well, ''C'est la vie''; no hard feelings on my part. I'm sure some good will come out of it. <small>--<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;">] | ] </span></small> 21:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Good (I think?) I don't think anything is an "out-of-control incivility-fire", but perhaps there is more context somewhere that I'm not seeing. I have only ever worked on the Wales article, I have no vested interest in the content (or knowledge for that matter), and was asked by Ddstretch to comment as uninvolved, regarding the lead sentence. There's an archive of that craziness on Talk:Wales. The article has remained in my watchlist is all. I'm sure some good will come out of it, I found a refreshingly dedicated group of editors (with vastly different POVs mind you) that came together and found a solution that has "stuck" for a couple of weeks, no small feat considering the edit warring and near-protection of the article that was eminent. I think what happened is that the tagging ''felt'' "drive-by", too soon after so much effort went into the "lead". I strongly agree with you that there are multiple issues in the lead. The tag, while added completely in good faith, was simply not helping address the issues, it was merely shining a blinding light in the eyes of those working on fixing it. Good will come from the discussion on the talkpage, I have no doubt. Moving right along! ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 21:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== July 2008 == | |||
] Please don't stop introducing jokes into Misplaced Pages{{#if:User talk:Tanthalas39|, such as those you created at ]}}. Misplaced Pages is a ], and contributions of this type are considered ]! Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being a ] for humor! ] {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- User:Clubjuggle/uw-joke --> --] ]/] 20:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:heh. guilty. And, is that really a template? I need to find that one, I can think of several admins pages that I can add it to...] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 20:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::It's in my user space at ]. I have no objection to moving it to WP-space if you think that will fly! --] ]/] 20:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::]. It will make for quite the hilarious MFD down the road if anyone else actually notices it. I recommend ]. heh. ] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 20:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::See ]. :) --] ]/] 21:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Purrrrfect. And MBisanz, shame on you for actually bluelinking my ridiculously long WP: template idea. But hilarious nonetheless. May they never go ]....] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 21:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::Just when you think I'm not watching. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 21:12, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Heh, I always knew you were watching. I don't swear as much as I used to because I know you (and Jesus) are watching....] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 21:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::::::"Part of the uw-humour user warning template series" :) '''''<font color="green">]</font><font color="blue">]</font>''''' 21:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== I need someone to talk to... oh :) == | |||
Hey there Keeper. I just came here because I almost never get any new messages anymore. Besides Balloonman a few days ago and the 4 DYK templates on my short talk page... Heh... I just wanted to let you know I got a new user page design (Yay!). So if you come across someone with my old user page design (i.e ]), it's not me. ;) I also started adopting again... You can look at the program ]... hopefully it won't break down like the last time from what I've learned. I'll basically adopt only one editor, possibly two if someone desperately needs it. Would like your opinions since I have nobody to talk to. :P -- ] (''''']''''') 22:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Pudge! == | |||
== Wednesday, January 15, 2025 Minnesota User Group Meeting and 2025 Misplaced Pages Day Celebration == | |||
] a Yankee?? WTF were they (Yankees and Tigers!) thinking! . I'm not happy. ]! <small>/OT comments </small><font face="Verdana"><font color="Blue">]</font></font> 22:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Hehe, soon you'll see ] with the ]. :P -- ] ] (''''']''''') 22:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:(e/c response to TCari) It only proves to me that ''your'' team is more willing to ''buy'' a team rather than build one. Glad to see Mr. Golden-glove out of the AL central, for what it's worth...] {{IPA|ǀ}} ] 22:21, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::bite me :-p, they gave away nothing. Farnsworth was an inherited commodity (from whom, I don't remember) so it's even. To Ryry, nope probably the Dodgers when his contract ends, but I'll believe that when I see it. Don't think Torre will last that long. We didn't need a third catcher. To quote a friend, it fills the need for a Rodriquez we know used steroids :o <font face="Verdana"><font color="Blue">]</font></font> 22:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::Like the Nady trade, this was a rip off. Farnsworthless is terrible. It's basically just a salary dump, but couldn't they dump his salary on another team? Pudge is still one of the best catchers around. ''']''' '']'' 22:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::::Was going to ping you but I figured you'd see it here. Once again, Keeperpedia is about to become baseballpedia. I don't get how Cashman does it, but he does. This was less one-sided than Nady, I think. Did Detroit need someone in the pen? I haven't dug around too much. Headed offline for a bit, back later. <font face="Verdana"><font color="Blue">]</font></font> 22:37, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::::Just got back from Yanks-O's. Cheered teh loudest in teh stadium when a Giambi homer went foul. | |||
:::::Some game for Abreu, huh? | |||
:::::And i heard about pudge. No comment. <font color="amaranth">]</font>''''' <sup><font color="chocolate">]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="bistre">]</font></sub> 01:59, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Cari, Farnsworth played for the Cubs first, I remember going to Wrigley a few times and seeing him. He's not the best reliever, sure, but pitching is still the Yankees' biggest weakness right now. Posada is out, but Molina has been playing good defense and hitting somewhat well too. It doesn't make sense for the Yanks to trade a decent pitcher for yet another old catcher who's retiring in a couple years. ]''']''' 02:53, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Would someone take a look at this for me? == | |||
{{Minnesota meetup/2025-01-15}} | |||
There's a user that's flinging baseless accusations of personal attacks, incivility, and on and on at first Blechnic, and now me. S/he's drug Fritzpoll, Eusebus, and a couple of others into it. Would someone take a look and warn her about accusing others of policy violations that they didn't commit? ] is the link. ] ] ] 02:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
::] (]) 23:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 23:54, 13 December 2024
userpage | talk | dashboard | rfa | contribs | subpages | freqtemps | afd/o | archive |
Happy holidays!
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityFollowing a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityFollowing a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux 00:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC) Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityFollowing a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux 05:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
So glad to see you pop up in my watchlist, and glad I had my monthly ish check in to see this. Twinkies above .500 and Vikes have a QB. Crazy season in St. Olaf! Hope you're well. AN:K and the current state of the White House. Oof StarM 03:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Keeper76. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) It's been a good rideMaybe not a wild one. It's been 10 years since you gave encouragement to me when I first started editing. I've never forgotten your kindness and good advice. Take care. --RexxS (talk) 01:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Vikings in the playoffsI'd say I'd root for them for your sake, but I'm committed to the Jags' bandwagon. What a weird season. StarM 03:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
HiYou around? —usernamekiran(talk) 00:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Happy football seasonLet's go Giants! Hope you're well, friend StarM 23:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Football....If you surface in the next fortnight or so and feel like some light reading, have a look at Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Packers sweep/archive1 as gridiron is not my area of expertise by any means.....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Keeper76. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Is it baseball season yet?It's the doldrums for this northerner. The local football team found a spectacular way to grasp defeat from the claws of victory and missed the playoffs. In better sports, pitchers don't report for over a month. What to do. Keeper | 76 04:42, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC) ... and again today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC) May the 4th be with youand Yankees/Twinkies on our TVs. Hope you're well, Keep! StarM 15:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
it's officially the post seasonwouldn't be without Yankees/Twinkes. Hope you're well StarM 01:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC) Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Crystal balloh memories. 12 years ago. How is that even possible?!?! StarM 17:19, 1 April 2020 (UTC) Postseason baseballbut is it really if the Yankees aren't playing the Twinkies? Hope you're well in this 2020 upside down land StarM 22:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC) Queering Misplaced Pages 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months. We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities. More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:49, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Deletion review for Kiana MadeiraResolved – discussion closedAn editor has asked for a deletion review of Kiana Madeira. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Dinnydee (talk) 03:56, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Nomination of Charles William Ledbetter for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles William Ledbetter, an article that that you have contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Charles William Ledbetter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Patapsco913 (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC) Take good care of Sanchez and Ursheiathey'll be missed in pinstripes. Hope you and yours are well in these continued crazy times. Play ball! Star Mississippi 01:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Just to let you knowYou have been added to Missing Wikipedians. IMiss2010 (talk) 13:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
"Mainstream (terminology)" listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mainstream (terminology) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream (terminology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC) Hey thereI saw that you were removed from Missing Wikipedians. Glad to see you're still around, even if only for a little while! I hope life has been treating you well :) Acalamari 02:59, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
User_talk:DGG#Passing_of_David_GoodmanHi friend. Wanted to be sure you saw this. What a huge loss and along with you, one of the first Misplaced Pages editors I knew. Star Mississippi 01:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
|
Twinkies!
Wow, first postseason series win since 2002. You're clearly good luck! No Love, The Stinkees. Star Mississippi 18:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Uff Da! Editing the Misplaced Pages for Absolute Beginners
Wiki UFF DA! - Editing the Misplaced Pages for Absolute Beginners | |
---|---|
Join us at one of our three FREE workshops in Minnesota, where you can learn how to edit Misplaced Pages and add Minnesota's local history in a relaxed and supportive setting. Work alongside others and discover how easy editing Misplaced Pages can be. The workshops aim to enhance the ability of communities in Greater and rural Minnesota to edit Misplaced Pages and comprehend it's editing culture and guidelines, as well as to expand Misplaced Pages's coverage of Minnesota's history. Already good at editing the Misplaced Pages? You're welcome to come and work on local history Minnesota Misplaced Pages articles alongside others. Registration is required to be included for lunch. Event 1 @ Morris, MN
Event 2 @ Chisholm, MN
Event 3 @ Mankato, MN
Facilitator: Myotus | Joe Hoover These workshops are put on by the Minnesota Historical Society as part of their commitment to the Minnesota local history community and are led by Local History Services. |
November 2024 Minnesota User Group Meeting
In the area? You're invited to the November 2024 Minnesota User Group Meeting
The organizer of this soiree is Joe Hoover aka Myotus feel free to drop him a message. Okay its been a while since the Misplaced Pages Minnesota User Group has meet. Since the last time we meet there has been social upheaval, plague, etc... - no small thing to be sure. There has been some sad lonely discussions on the Minnesota Meetup page on getting together but little action. So here it is. Come and be seen. Talk about the future of the Minnesota User Group and see what nefarious plans we can hatch. Date: Sunday, November 3, 2024 Look forward to seeing folks! |
Wednesday, January 15, 2025 Minnesota User Group Meeting and 2025 Misplaced Pages Day Celebration
In the area? You're invited to the 2025 Minnesota User Group Misplaced Pages Day Celebration
The organizer of this feed is Joe Hoover aka Myotus feel free to drop him a message. Wednesday, January 15, 2025 is Misplaced Pages Day and the Minnesota User Group is meeting to celebrate the day with a Tater Tot Hotdish Dinner!
To ensure that a helping of Tater Tot Hotdish is waiting for you at the meeting please RVSP on the event page. Transit
|