Revision as of 21:56, 5 August 2008 view sourceDavid.Mestel (talk | contribs)Rollbackers5,396 edits writing | Latest revision as of 00:57, 6 January 2024 view source JPxG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators118,955 editsm Protected "Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2008-08-09/Arbitration report": old newspaper articles don't need to be continually updated, the only real edits expected here are from bots/scripts, and vandalism is extremely hard to monitor ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost-article-header-v2|{{{1|The Report on Lengthy Litigation}}}|By ]}} | |||
<noinclude>]</noinclude> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
<h2 style="margin-right:60px;">The Report on Lengthy Litigation</h2> | |||
:<small>By ] and ], ], ]</small> | |||
The ] did not open or close any cases this week, leaving three currently open. | The ] did not open or close any cases this week, leaving three currently open. | ||
Line 9: | Line 5: | ||
===An apology=== | ===An apology=== | ||
I must apologise to readers for taking my eye somewhat off the ball, and failing to notice until ] kindly brought it to my attention the desysopping of ], in a , on |
I must apologise to readers for taking my eye somewhat off the ball, and failing to notice until ] kindly brought it to my attention the desysopping of ], in a , on 18 July, pending his contacting the committee. This was on the basis of his failure to communicate regarding a large number of he had taken. | ||
===Evidence phase=== | ===Evidence phase=== | ||
Line 24: | Line 20: | ||
* ''']''': A case involving disputes between ], ], ], ], and others. The case, which has seen little-to-no public input from arbitrators, is currently subject to a motion to dismiss, with the support of one arbitrator, and the opposition of one. | * ''']''': A case involving disputes between ], ], ], ], and others. The case, which has seen little-to-no public input from arbitrators, is currently subject to a motion to dismiss, with the support of one arbitrator, and the opposition of one. | ||
<noinclude> | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Footer|{{BASEPAGENAME}}|2008-07-28|2008-08-11|{{SUBPAGENAME}}}} | |||
</noinclude> | |||
] | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost-article-end-v2}} | |||
<noinclude>{{Misplaced Pages:Signpost/Template:Signpost-article-comments-end|||}}</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 00:57, 6 January 2024
Arbitration reportThe Report on Lengthy Litigation
Contribute — Share this By David MestelThe Arbitration Committee did not open or close any cases this week, leaving three currently open.
An apology
I must apologise to readers for taking my eye somewhat off the ball, and failing to notice until TML kindly brought it to my attention the desysopping of Can't sleep, clown will eat me, in a summary motion, on 18 July, pending his contacting the committee. This was on the basis of his failure to communicate regarding a large number of administrative actions he had taken.
Evidence phase
- SlimVirgin-Lar: A case brought by Thatcher, asking the committee to review the use of checkuser by Lar, in the light of comments by SlimVirgin (here, inter alia), alleging that he misused the tool. Evidence is to be submitted privately to the committee by e-mail.
Voting phase
- Geogre-William M. Connolley: A case involving wheel warring between Geogre and William M. Connolley. William M. Connolley inappropriately extended a block on Giano II, while Geogre inappropriately reversed the block, and reversed page protection on Giano's talk page. The case is currently in the voting phase; proposed remedies include:
- Four different versions of a remedy modifying or removing remedy 2.2 in IRC. All versions are supported by four to five arbitrators, and opposed by three to four arbitrators.
- Currently passing is a remedy prohibiting Geogre and Connolley from taking any administrative action with respect to Giano II. There is also injunction in effect prohibiting blocks or unblocks of Giano without the consent of a committee member.
Motion to close
- C68-FM-SV: A case involving disputes between Cla68, FeloniousMonk, SlimVirgin, JzG, and others. The case, which has seen little-to-no public input from arbitrators, is currently subject to a motion to dismiss, with the support of one arbitrator, and the opposition of one.
| ||
Also this week: | ||
| ||
(← Previous Arbitration report) | Signpost archives | (Next Arbitration report→) |
|
Discuss this story
To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.No comments yet. Yours could be the first!+ Add a commentWant the latest Signpost delivered to your talk page each month? Home About Archives Newsroom Subscribe Suggestions Category: