Misplaced Pages

Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:09, 18 August 2008 editEastlaw (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers79,915 edits footnoted reference← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:15, 25 August 2024 edit undoInternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Pending changes reviewers5,381,790 edits Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5 
(52 intermediate revisions by 46 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes Act''' ({{USStatute|109|228|120|387|2006|05|29}}) is an ] that prohibits protests within 300 feet (100 m) of the entrance of a cemetery under control of the ] (a division of the ]) from 60 minutes before to 60 minutes after a funeral. Penalties for violating the act are up to $100,000 in fines and up to one year imprisonment. The '''Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act''' ({{USStatute|109|228|120|387|2006|05|29}}) is an ] that prohibits protests within 300 feet (90 m) of the entrance of any cemetery under control of the ] (a division of the ]) from 60 minutes before to 60 minutes after a ]. Penalties for violating the act are up to $100,000 in fines and up to one year imprisonment.


The Act was sponsored by ], a Republican ] from Michigan. It was introduced in large part to combat the campaign by ] from the ], of ]. Phelps and his supporters regularly demonstrate at the funerals of American servicemembers who lost their lives in the ]. While protest is normally protected by the ], ] and ] are not.<ref>See e.g. '']'', 315 U.S. 568 (1942)</ref> The bill was introduced in large part to combat the campaign by ] from the ], of ]. Phelps and his supporters regularly demonstrated at the funerals of American service members who were killed in the ], grounded on the belief that the deaths are divine retribution for social tolerance of ]. This form of protest is protected by the ].<ref>See e.g. '']'' (2010)</ref>


⚫ The Act was approved by the House via roll call vote with an overwhelming majority of 408 to 3. ] (R-]), ] (D-]) and ] (D-]) voted against the Act, opposing it on ] and ] grounds. Twenty-one members of the House of Representatives did not vote. Barney Frank said of the vote, "I think it’s very likely to be found unconstitutional. It’s true that when you defend civil liberties you are typically defending people who do obnoxious things… You play into their hand when you let them provoke you into overdoing it. I don’t want these thugs to claim America is hypocritical."<ref>{{cite news |work=] |url=https://www.questia.com/read/1G1-145577702 |title=House OKs ban on funeral protests; Leaders hope to have measure to president by Memorial Day |date=May 10, 2006 |first=Christina |last=Bellantoni |accessdate=April 13, 2010}}</ref> The Senate passed the bill unanimously. It was promptly signed into law by President ] on May 29, 2006.<ref></ref>
"Families deserve the time to bury their American heroes with dignity and in peace," Rogers said. "It saddens me that such a law is necessary, but it is crucial that America put its arms around these grieving families and say ‘we support you and thank you for the sacrifice your loved one has made for our nation’ and that we will do what it takes to protect your right to mourn in quiet peace and with dignity."{{fact|date=August 2007}}


⚫ The ] (ACLU) opposed the legislation, saying that the Act was unconstitutional and that it would not stand up in court. They said of a similar ban in ], "The ACLU lawsuit recognizes that Kentucky has an interest in showing respect and compassion for the deceased and for their families, but argues that sections of these laws go too far in prohibiting peaceful protests."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hubpolitics.com/2006/05/11/rep-frank-votes-against-%e2%80%9crespect-for-america%e2%80%99s-fallen-heroes-act/ |title=Rep. Frank Votes Against 'Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act' |first=Aaron |last=Margolis |date=May 11, 2006 |work=Hub Politics |accessdate=April 13, 2010 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090105161932/http://hubpolitics.com/2006/05/11/rep-frank-votes-against-%e2%80%9crespect-for-america%e2%80%99s-fallen-heroes-act/ |archivedate=January 5, 2009 }}</ref>
⚫ The Act was approved by the House via roll call vote with an overwhelming majority of 408 to 3. ] (R-TX), ] (D-OR) and ] (D-MA) voted against the Act, opposing it on ] and ] grounds. Twenty-one members of the House of Representatives did not vote. Frank said of the vote, "I think it’s very likely to be found unconstitutional. It’s true that when you defend civil liberties you are typically defending people who do obnoxious things... You play into their hand when you let them provoke you into overdoing it. I don’t want these thugs to claim America is hypocritical.”<ref>''Washington Times'', , ], ]. Retrieved ], ].</ref>


The American Civil Liberties Union prevailed in a 2007 lawsuit challenging a similar state law in Missouri.<ref></ref>
⚫ The ] opposed the legislation, saying that the Act was unconstitutional and that it would not stand up in court. They said of a similar ban in ], "The ACLU lawsuit recognizes that Kentucky has an interest in showing respect and compassion for the deceased and for their families, but argues that sections of these laws go too far in prohibiting peaceful protests."<ref>HubPolitics.com, , ], ]. Retrieved ], ].</ref>

The Senate passed the bill unanimously. It was promptly signed into law by President ] on May 29, 2006.<ref></ref>


==References== ==References==
{{reflist}} {{Reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
* , via U.S. ] * , via U.S. ]
* * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081112092830/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR05037:@@@L&summ2=m& |date=2008-11-12 }}
* * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160116052351/http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN04042:@@@L&summ2=m& |date=2016-01-16 }}
* *
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714183344/http://www.usfallenwarriors.com/ |date=2014-07-14 }}


] ]
]
] ]
] ]
]

{{US-fed-statute-stub}}

Latest revision as of 01:15, 25 August 2024

The Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act (Pub. L. 109–228 (text) (PDF), 120 Stat. 387, enacted May 29, 2006) is an Act of Congress that prohibits protests within 300 feet (90 m) of the entrance of any cemetery under control of the National Cemetery Administration (a division of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs) from 60 minutes before to 60 minutes after a funeral. Penalties for violating the act are up to $100,000 in fines and up to one year imprisonment.

The bill was introduced in large part to combat the campaign by Fred Phelps from the Westboro Baptist Church, of Topeka, Kansas. Phelps and his supporters regularly demonstrated at the funerals of American service members who were killed in the war in Iraq, grounded on the belief that the deaths are divine retribution for social tolerance of homosexuality. This form of protest is protected by the First Amendment.

The Act was approved by the House via roll call vote with an overwhelming majority of 408 to 3. Ron Paul (R-TX), David Wu (D-OR) and Barney Frank (D-MA) voted against the Act, opposing it on civil liberties and constitutional grounds. Twenty-one members of the House of Representatives did not vote. Barney Frank said of the vote, "I think it’s very likely to be found unconstitutional. It’s true that when you defend civil liberties you are typically defending people who do obnoxious things… You play into their hand when you let them provoke you into overdoing it. I don’t want these thugs to claim America is hypocritical." The Senate passed the bill unanimously. It was promptly signed into law by President George W. Bush on May 29, 2006.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) opposed the legislation, saying that the Act was unconstitutional and that it would not stand up in court. They said of a similar ban in Kentucky, "The ACLU lawsuit recognizes that Kentucky has an interest in showing respect and compassion for the deceased and for their families, but argues that sections of these laws go too far in prohibiting peaceful protests."

The American Civil Liberties Union prevailed in a 2007 lawsuit challenging a similar state law in Missouri.

References

  1. See e.g. Snyder v. Phelps (2010)
  2. Bellantoni, Christina (May 10, 2006). "House OKs ban on funeral protests; Leaders hope to have measure to president by Memorial Day". The Washington Times. Retrieved April 13, 2010.
  3. H.R. 5037 [109th]: Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act (GovTrack.us)
  4. Margolis, Aaron (May 11, 2006). "Rep. Frank Votes Against 'Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act'". Hub Politics. Archived from the original on January 5, 2009. Retrieved April 13, 2010.
  5. American Civil Libert?ies Union : ACLU of Eastern Missouri Applauds Decision In Free Speech Case

External links

Categories: