Misplaced Pages

Talk:Gertrude Stein: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:42, 16 September 2005 edit203.221.81.154 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:58, 20 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,234,450 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 13 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: US and Canada.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
(281 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
==Smelly==
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=B|vital=yes|living=no|listas=Stein, Gertrude|1=
The following edit, ], appears to be vandalism. ] 20:48, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-priority=high|a&e-work-group=yes}}
{{WikiProject Poetry|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Theatre|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Opera}}
{{WikiProject Women's History|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Women writers|importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Pittsburgh|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies|person=yes}}
{{WikiProject France|importance=high|tf=Paris}}
{{WikiProject Women in Music|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Jewish Women|importance=high}}
{{ArtAndFeminism article|2016}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| archiveheader = {{tan}}
| maxarchivesize = 100K
| counter = 2
| minthreadsleft = 3
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| algo = old(30d)
| archive = Talk:Gertrude Stein/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Archive box|auto=yes}}


== Questioning the neutrality of the Critical reception section ==
:Sure looks like it to me.. She had a husband??? Not in any other bios of her I've read. She was deported by Teddy Roosevelt?? Again, not in other bios. Besides, she was a native-born citizen; how could she be deported? Will look further, but think it should be reverted..


By my count, in the "Critical reception" section there are nine negative reviews of Stein's works, one positive, and one neutral. It has been this way for nearly 10 years now. I don't know how to go about finding sources that might reflect the reality better (she is still widely studied in academia which would be unlikely if 90% of the world detested her as much as indicated in that section). Should this section be trimmed until a more neutral editor can provide less negative sources? ] (]) 20:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
:Very strange case, though. Doesn't look like most vandalism. ] 04:30, 2005 May 4 (UTC)


:Critical reception is meant to be critical, is it not? If you believe the article needs more neutrality, perhaps suggesting a generalized "reception" section would be more appropriate. Personally, I don't have a problem with the level of criticism presented in the article (and I believe treating it as a statistic is heavy-handed and 'agendistic'), but I do think it's rather bloated. Any famous person, especially someone radical like Stein, has plenty of people who are unhappy with them. Additionally, being studied is not a good indicator of virtue. ] (]) 14:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
::Just noted the discrepancy of dates: 1903 - family moved back to Germany; later she moved to US and became politically active; 1903 - she was deported to Germany by Teddy Roosevelt, because of political activism. It gets reverted.. ] 04:42, 2005 May 4 (UTC)


::Academic criticism is not the same thing as piling on someone. I get that the words are the same, but in context they have different meanings. Academia criticism is meant to explain a work while sometimes discussing the positive and negative aspects of the work. Being critical in the sense you are using is only meant to express disdain for a work. The former is what we want in Misplaced Pages (and any encyclopedia), the latter doesn't belong here at all.
:::I would't worry about the dates; the changes were simple vandalism. Her father Daniel was a clothier, not a mill worker. She lived in the US not Germany, she was born in 1874, not 1847, she left the US of her own volition, she didn't marry any man, she wasn't a Nazi, and she didn't keep her rat feces in mason jars. Etc. - ] 04:50, 4 May 2005 (UTC)


:::"Personally, I don't have a problem with the level of criticism presented in the article"
== stein date of death ==
::: Ok, but does the section match Misplaced Pages guidelines and policies? It seems pretty heavily biased.


:::"I believe treating it as a statistic is heavy-handed and 'agendistic'"
The article for July 27 lists Stein as being one of the people that died on that date. The article on Stein lists her date of death as July 29.
:::Almost all of the negative criticism was inserted by a single editor who clearly had an agenda. All I'm trying to do is fix that initial wrong.


:::"Any famous person, especially someone radical like Stein, has plenty of people who are unhappy with them"
== stein date of death ==
:::I have no problem with listing negative responses to Stein, that is fair and what Misplaced Pages is all about.


:::"being studied is not a good indicator of virtue"
The article for July 27 lists Stein as being one of the people that died on that date. The article on Stein lists her date of death as July 29.
:::I never said anything about virtue or quality. What I did say is that given how much she is studied, there must be plenty of people (including critics) who like her work and certainly more than the 10% that the previous editor implied by how they edited the section. If it really is only 10% then we need a source for this to explain the current disparity in that section. Otherwise, we should take our lead from other articles where both sides are generally presented in a fair manner with at least an appearance of equal treatment. As it stands now, that section is heavily biased. That is not how Misplaced Pages operates.

:::"I do think it's rather bloated"
:::That is another good argument for trimming the section down. ] (]) 17:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok, I trimmed the section down. It still has negative view but is better balanced/more neutral. ] (]) 22:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

== legacy ==

There is a reference to the "Gertrude Stein Democratic Club" at ]. ] (]) 11:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

== Photo of alleged "childhood home of Gertrude Stein" ==

There is no known evidence in land records, utility records, etc. that the building pictured is the building where Gertrude Stein was born. Professional title examiners have searched County land records, as have persons in the business of validating such historical data. No known documents have been produced that validate that Gertrude Stein was born in the building in the photo.
The plaque on the wall of the building is an artifact, attached approximately 70 years or more after Stein's birth date, at a time when the neighborhood was attempting renovation, having been virtually abandoned by its original owners.
If someone can document the validity of the claim that Stein was born in the building in the photo, the evidence should be produced. ] (]) 17:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
*Stop vandalizing the article '''It's referenced'''...] (]) 17:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

:: The edits aren't vandalism. Please assume good faith. ] (]) 17:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
::What is meant by "it's referenced'? ] (]) 11:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

*Check this out: ]...] (]) 16:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
*:Thanks for that.
*:The linked material explains "reference" but not the application to "it's".
*:Specifically, how is the photo of a building alleged to be where GS was born "referenced" to verify that claim? ] (]) 17:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
**The photo that you deleted was referenced by this link: ...] (]) 17:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
**:Thank you for the courtesy in supplying link to the Allegheny City Society.
**:Was that link embedded in the deleted caption under the photo, or in footnotes, or elsewhere? ] (]) 23:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
*Yes, it was linked as a reference to the photo. That's why I returned the photo to the article...] (]) 00:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
*:Thanks another time.
*:Do you mind showing me where in the text of the Misplaced Pages article the link was embedded? ] (]) 00:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
*Ok, I'm gonna put the photo back and the reference is at the end of the caption...] (]) 02:22, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
::Click on the number 10 at the caption end; that goes to the link...] (]) 02:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
:::I see. ] (]) 06:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:58, 20 October 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gertrude Stein article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconPoetry High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTheatre Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Misplaced Pages.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconOpera
WikiProject iconThis article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Misplaced Pages articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera
WikiProject iconWomen's History High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen writers Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPennsylvania Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPittsburgh Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies: Person
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.
WikiProject iconFrance: Paris High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Paris task force.
WikiProject iconWomen in Music High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJewish Women High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconArt+Feminism
WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved at an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon in 2016.Art+FeminismWikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminismTemplate:ArtAndFeminism articleArt+Feminism


Archives

1, 2


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Questioning the neutrality of the Critical reception section

By my count, in the "Critical reception" section there are nine negative reviews of Stein's works, one positive, and one neutral. It has been this way for nearly 10 years now. I don't know how to go about finding sources that might reflect the reality better (she is still widely studied in academia which would be unlikely if 90% of the world detested her as much as indicated in that section). Should this section be trimmed until a more neutral editor can provide less negative sources? SQGibbon (talk) 20:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Critical reception is meant to be critical, is it not? If you believe the article needs more neutrality, perhaps suggesting a generalized "reception" section would be more appropriate. Personally, I don't have a problem with the level of criticism presented in the article (and I believe treating it as a statistic is heavy-handed and 'agendistic'), but I do think it's rather bloated. Any famous person, especially someone radical like Stein, has plenty of people who are unhappy with them. Additionally, being studied is not a good indicator of virtue. 50.247.181.41 (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Academic criticism is not the same thing as piling on someone. I get that the words are the same, but in context they have different meanings. Academia criticism is meant to explain a work while sometimes discussing the positive and negative aspects of the work. Being critical in the sense you are using is only meant to express disdain for a work. The former is what we want in Misplaced Pages (and any encyclopedia), the latter doesn't belong here at all.
"Personally, I don't have a problem with the level of criticism presented in the article"
Ok, but does the section match Misplaced Pages guidelines and policies? It seems pretty heavily biased.
"I believe treating it as a statistic is heavy-handed and 'agendistic'"
Almost all of the negative criticism was inserted by a single editor who clearly had an agenda. All I'm trying to do is fix that initial wrong.
"Any famous person, especially someone radical like Stein, has plenty of people who are unhappy with them"
I have no problem with listing negative responses to Stein, that is fair and what Misplaced Pages is all about.
"being studied is not a good indicator of virtue"
I never said anything about virtue or quality. What I did say is that given how much she is studied, there must be plenty of people (including critics) who like her work and certainly more than the 10% that the previous editor implied by how they edited the section. If it really is only 10% then we need a source for this to explain the current disparity in that section. Otherwise, we should take our lead from other articles where both sides are generally presented in a fair manner with at least an appearance of equal treatment. As it stands now, that section is heavily biased. That is not how Misplaced Pages operates.
"I do think it's rather bloated"
That is another good argument for trimming the section down. SQGibbon (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok, I trimmed the section down. It still has negative view but is better balanced/more neutral. SQGibbon (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

legacy

There is a reference to the "Gertrude Stein Democratic Club" at Muriel Bowser. Spicemix (talk) 11:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Photo of alleged "childhood home of Gertrude Stein"

There is no known evidence in land records, utility records, etc. that the building pictured is the building where Gertrude Stein was born. Professional title examiners have searched County land records, as have persons in the business of validating such historical data. No known documents have been produced that validate that Gertrude Stein was born in the building in the photo. The plaque on the wall of the building is an artifact, attached approximately 70 years or more after Stein's birth date, at a time when the neighborhood was attempting renovation, having been virtually abandoned by its original owners. If someone can document the validity of the claim that Stein was born in the building in the photo, the evidence should be produced. Sapienttwo (talk) 17:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

The edits aren't vandalism. Please assume good faith. PhilKnight (talk) 17:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
What is meant by "it's referenced'? Sapienttwo (talk) 11:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Click on the number 10 at the caption end; that goes to the link...Modernist (talk) 02:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
I see. Sapienttwo (talk) 06:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Categories: