| Revision as of 19:51, 25 August 2008 editElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits Formal notification of ArbCom case← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:43, 20 November 2018 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,050 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:N-HH/Archive 7) (bot | ||
| (1,000 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 75K | |maxarchivesize = 75K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 7 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(14d) | ||
| |archive = User talk: |
|archive = User talk:N-HH/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{archives|auto=yes}} | {{archives|auto=yes}} | ||
| ==Notification== | |||
| == Re: ] and defenestrations == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | |||
| == Another Daily Mail RfC == | |||
| Thanks for the heads-up, I'm already on it: . I'm still formulating the post, but it will appear soon. | |||
| There is an RfC at ]. Your input would be most helpful. --] (]) 12:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| Cheers and thanks again! <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']''' - 01.02.2008 09:05</small> | |||
| == Soapbox Sam and HenryGarden1000 == | |||
| :! <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - ''']''' - 01.02.2008 09:27</small> | |||
| Because you posted on the talk pages of both of these editors, and queried whether they were the same person, I'm sending you to an SPI I just opened about them. ] (]) 05:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Archiving == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Hi Nickhh, I wanted to offer some archiving assistance? I noticed that your talkpage is starting to get a bit long. Just FYI, anytime a page gets over about 32K or so, some browsers start having trouble with it. Your page is currently over twice that. If you'd like, I'd be happy to set up an archiving bot for you? That would automatically check your page on a regular schedule, and auto-archive any threads that had been inactive for a certain amount of time. You would still be able to access them in archive, but it would help reduce the load of the "live" page. Thanks, and let me know, --]]] 19:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : Hi, just repeating my offer? The page is currently around 100K. I could setup an archive bot for you very rapidly if you'd like. This would not delete any threads, it would simply move the inactive ones off to a subpage, which would help keep the "live" page more manageable. You could choose whatever time cutoff you like. From a quick glance, I'd recommend a one-month cutoff, but this could be easily configured if you want something different. --]]] 04:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh yeah, thanks - I kind of forgot about this for a while. I actually remembered only yesterday and had a quick look through how to do it myself, only to get confused and give up. Any help would be appreciated, one month would be about right I guess as I don't get that much traffic here. --] (]) 10:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: Done. :) I seeded it with the 2007 threads, and it'll kick in sometime in the next 24 hours to archive the rest. That'll be anything that's been inactive for at least 30 days. If things get quiet, it'll only "harvest" down to a minimum of five threads, so don't worry, it won't ever blank the entire page. :) Let me know if you have any questions, --]]] 19:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 08:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == E-mail address == | |||
| :This is literally everything that's wrong with Misplaced Pages in one example from one editor: opening a deletion page for one of the oldest and best-known wineries in Spain, with a 150-year history, while to argue *against* deleting a pointless, partisan gossip page about an ephemeral political "controversy" based ultimately on one Daily Mail report misrepresenting a one-off event five years after everyone else had long since forgotten about it. Absolute fuckwittery and pathetic and transparent political point-scoring at the same time. <small>'''] ]/]'''</small> 22:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| Tried to e-mail you but couldn't - could you possibly drop me a line using my email form so that I can talk to you off-wiki? -- ] (]) 08:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, N-HH. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| :Hi Chris - I may be being thick, but I can't see how to do that (I'm not very good with the more technical stuff here, even though I'm not an IT idiot at all). And actually I'm kind of against off-wiki conversations as a rule - I don't like it when it's clear that others have done it, so would feel a bit odd doing it myself. Plus I prefer to limit my involvement here to those times when I'm actually, well, here if you see what I mean (and I've been on site more often than I'd like recently anyway). Happy to have an open discussion of course though, if that would work--] (]) 11:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ::Here's the link - http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:EmailUser/ChrisO - you just need to go there and type whatever you want in the form before hitting the "send" button. For future reference, the "email this user" link in the toolbox on the lower left hand side of the page is what you need to look for. I generally agree about open discussions, but this concerns an administrative issue - it's not appropriate for an open discussion at this stage. -- ] (]) 20:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::Oh yes, I was looking on the main part of the page. The thing is I never registered my email here when I set up the account, and as above I'm not sure I want to and to start using it for Misplaced Pages related stuff. I'll keep an eye on things when I'm logged in here though if that helps. Cheers, Nick. --] (]) 08:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=866998273 --> | |||
| == Operation Defensive Shield == | |||
| Hi Nickhh! Please do not disrupt Misplaced Pages to ], as you did to ]. I trust that you are well familiar with the ] process, especiall the sentence ''Discuss the issue on a talk page. Never carry on a dispute on the article page itself.'' In other words, if an issue is raised on talk and you oppose it, make your claims on the talk page and not in the article itself. I hope you understand and this notice creates better cooperation between the two sides. Good day, ] <sup>(])</sup> 17:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Not sure if you're referring to the edit itself or the edit summary - the edit was fair enough, as material had been removed without consensus and I merely restored it, as any editor has the right to do. I wasn't trying to be disruptive, I was just putting back some detail which made the box more balanced. And I did of course on the talk page before making the edits (you seem to be suggesting I did not?). I do accept though that I could have phrased the second edit summary better - I was just trying to rather clumsily and pithily explain the point about balance, since in my view it read like some kind of IDF/MFA victory press release as phrased. Having said all that, as I've now also said on the talk page, I think Nudve's subsequent version is more or less the right way to go. --] (]) 17:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Elonka RfC == | |||
| Since you were involved in this dispute (and I've cited your words in connection with it), you may be interested in seeing ]. -- ] (]) 06:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==] == | |||
| As a result of the above-named Arbitration case, the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to Israel, Palestine, and related conflicts. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if given by an administrator and logged ]. | |||
| Nickhh, this edit summary was unacceptable. Please ensure that your future communications comply with ], thanks. --]]] 19:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:43, 20 November 2018
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Notification
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Another Daily Mail RfC
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail#Request for comment: Other criticisms section. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Soapbox Sam and HenryGarden1000
Because you posted on the talk pages of both of these editors, and queried whether they were the same person, I'm sending you this link to an SPI I just opened about them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 08:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- This is literally everything that's wrong with Misplaced Pages in one example from one editor: opening a deletion page for one of the oldest and best-known wineries in Spain, with a 150-year history, while diving in to argue *against* deleting a pointless, partisan gossip page about an ephemeral political "controversy" based ultimately on one Daily Mail report misrepresenting a one-off event five years after everyone else had long since forgotten about it. Absolute fuckwittery and pathetic and transparent political point-scoring at the same time. N-HH talk/edits 22:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, N-HH. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)