| Revision as of 23:55, 8 September 2008 editDurova (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,685 edits suggestion← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:11, 17 February 2023 edit undoCycloneYoris (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers83,270 edits Notification: listing of Rvvv at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (174 intermediate revisions by 58 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| {{/Template}} | |||
| A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 02:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Re: ] == | ||
| (in reply to a message you left me years ago) I think it's now too out of my interest areas, not because of what it is, but because of implications of the words defining it. Did the article improve?--] (]|]) 07:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for catching that extra vandalism that I missed. ] <small>]</small> 08:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Chhh listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Chhh'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 23:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The file ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ==who's the psych source?== | |||
| <blockquote>Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use</blockquote> | |||
| I understand they've all said similar things, right? Sheldrake, Radin, Jahn? If these three I think the ref would have enough weight, then. It's a highly central point to the whole debate so I was surprised it wasn't already in the lede. --<font style="bold">]</font><font color="black" style="bold">]</font> 08:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| actually, there must have been enough literature for a section exploring the stubborn and dogmatic response of mainstream science to these experiments. There is a critique/response of Sheldrake's work in a book I read the intro of on Amazon recently, and this proves that this discussion has currency. It's also a key factor that parapsychologists raise/use to explain why these things aren't yet accepted as true. I think it would be remiss of editors to omit all this highly relevant discussion.--<font style="bold">]</font><font color="black" style="bold">]</font> 08:13, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ==CfD for Category:Remote viewers and Category:Telepaths== | |||
| Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == "ESPPP" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| == Don't refactor someone else's talk page comment == | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| See ]. --] (]) 05:01, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 17#Rvvv}} until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small>]</small> <sup>]</sup> 10:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Removal of personal attacks is common practice, and allows the attacker to leave it be and no harm done. Removal of well-poisoning, I would think, is an especially good idea. ——''']'''</span> ] Ψ ]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 05:15, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :It is not a good idea to refactor someone elses comments at the best of times; it is especially inappropriate when those comments are directed at you (except on your own user talk page). <span style="font-variant:small-caps">] <sup>'''(])'''</sup></span> 07:58, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes. Now, what about the attack? Your emphasis on this issue is simply inappropriate when you do not deal with the main issue. Shoemaker should be warned that I will be asking ArbCom for a amendment to his case if he ever does something like this again. ——''']'''</span> ] Ψ ]<span style="color:#ffffff;">——</span> 08:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Apparently you aren't getting it Martinphi, so I will be clear here: | |||
| :::*Do not, under any circumstances remove any one else's comments (except on your own talk page) unless they are causing serious harm to your real life, non-Misplaced Pages identity. Do not interpret this with any latitude. | |||
| :::*Furthermore, you are asked to stop referring to or communicating to Shoemaker for at least 24 hours from this message. | |||
| :::*Furthermore, you are asked to pledge that you will wait for an acknowledgment of consensus before editing any policy page for the next week. | |||
| :::*You will acknowledge this message, and do so on the appropriate ] topic | |||
| :::If you do not do these things, I will remove my objection to you getting brand new topic bans, and instead endorse them.--] (]) 16:01, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, I noticed what looks like an edit war breaking out at that page. Strongly suggest backing away from the ''edit'' button (I'm leaving this message for both of you). Best wishes, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 23:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:11, 17 February 2023
File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aaevp-audacity_noise_levels.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hampton11235 (talk) 02:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Re: Astral projection
(in reply to a message you left me years ago) I think it's now too out of my interest areas, not because of what it is, but because of implications of the words defining it. Did the article improve?--dchmelik (t|c) 07:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Chhh listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chhh. Since you had some involvement with the Chhh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of File:Socratic barnstar.jpg
The file File:Socratic barnstar.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
"ESPPP" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ESPPP. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#ESPPP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
"Rvvv" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Rvvv has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 17 § Rvvv until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris 10:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)