Revision as of 13:32, 11 September 2008 editPromethean (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,237 edits →" Reading this, you have to wonder what went wrong ": new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:44, 28 October 2024 edit undoDaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers24,822 edits Happy First Edit Day! | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{UserTalkReplyhere}} | |||
{{administrator}} | |||
⚫ | {{archive box|auto=yes}} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
<!---------------------- new messages below this line please --------------------------> | |||
|archiveheader = {{atnhead}} | |||
|maxarchivesize = 100K | |||
|counter = 16 | |||
|algo = old(4d) | |||
|archive = User talk:Moondyne/Archive %(counter)d | |||
⚫ | }} | ||
{{User:Moondyne/WA}} | |||
⚫ | {{archive box|auto=yes |
||
<!--{{wikibreak|image=Cluster_Ballooning.jpg|imagesize=200px|align=center}}--> | |||
== Ghost towns == | |||
== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
Your question is a good one - some are purely abandoned - some completely immersed (Crotty in Tassies west coast) - while some a mers ghosts of former selves - I suspect a lot depends if there is a definition at the main article at which the term becomes the category. I consider cue, mount magnet and yalgoo ghost towns of their former selves - but i suspect no one else would call them that - you are most welcome to change it out of the category/article - its just i was taking the imperative of it being referred to as one from the the king book summary which had it listed as being one. I have a copy of the golden trail book and cd - havent check it for how it refers to the old places - also realise if havent got the ''off like flies'' book in there as a ref - i think a lot of the people phtoographed and interviewed were in the old dying towns ]] 10:51, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
] Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of December 2023. | |||
''The town was first settled in the 1890s as part of a gold rush but today is a virtual ghost town.'' Finding that in the Sandstone article is somewhat disconcerting as well - maybe we need to have a vote at the Wa noticeboard whether we allow ''virtual ghost towns'' or not, or by what criteria they are extant as towns and what point they become ghost - hum ]] 02:49, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
Fine no probs - i think the use of the word at sandstone art a bit off putting - forget the vote - just careful usage then - cheers ]] 03:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 00:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
== In between one disater and another == | |||
⚫ | == Amazing == | ||
Today sorted out the pre standard gauge junctions for the old narrow gauge from childows to northam - will atempt to put in - also do you know if any of the whiz jig conversion things can cope with chains? ]] 08:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
just short of 20 years!!! ] 08:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
:*<code><nowiki>{{convert|100|chain}}</nowiki></code> → {{convert|100|chain}}; or | |||
:*<code><nowiki>{{convert|100|chain|m}}</nowiki></code> → {{convert|100|chain|m}}; or | |||
:*<code><nowiki>{{convert|100|chain|km}}</nowiki></code> → {{convert|100|chain|km}} | |||
:Suit yourself. ] 08:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
== CfD nomination at {{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members}} == | |||
Thank you dont know when i ll start but it will involve quite a few arts to co-ordinate the infos and the links ]] 08:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''{{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1#Category:WikiProject X members}}''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd mass notify--> Thank you. ]] 09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Flying Porcine visit == | |||
== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
Im getting off for the real world but mystified why this http://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_homesteads_in_Western_Australia:_L looks like it is - I'll leave you to ponder it i am indeed now away from the computer when you read this - cheers ]] 00:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thanks for following that up - hope we are all the wise from any further info on that - cheers ]] 07:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
] Established ] provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of April 2024. | |||
== GA Australia Music == | |||
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ]. | |||
Thanks for the fix - was getting a bit lost & confused. ] (]) 04:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin 2 -->— ] 00:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Microformats == | |||
:Desysop requested and actioned. ] (]) 14:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
With regards to your post on Andy's page, let me know if ] makes sense. I can elaborate on it if you want. ] ] 07:10, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
::The class names are fixed. If you have a microcode-enabled browser or browser plugin, the browser will parse it to produce a geolink. The same applies to addresses and telephone numbers, where you can get the necessary data as a ] to export to your addressbook. Browsers that are not enabled will ignore the special class. ] ] 07:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
⚫ | == |
||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
didnt see you on- it looked like a conventional warning was gonna be a waste of time with the relative speed of blanks and focus on non english abuse ]] 11:33, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Just got here. Off again shortly. ] 11:36, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:copperplate gothic;">] (])</span></span> 16:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== " Reading this, you have to wonder what went wrong " == | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
My stern defense of Bluegoblin7. He was accused of sock puppetry and several admins were calling for his head stating in-factual information, out of stress of the scenario of him being indef blocked I called one of the admins a joke. Which resulted in no less than four hostile "Final warning" messages from admins both on ANI and my talkpage somewhat WP:BITE like but never the less, Feeling provoked I ranted on thier talk pages and more specifically, likened the adminship to joining a brothel. I was consequently blocked by Arbitrator Deskana for 3 hours. (a cool down block) No one would over turn an arbitrators block, official or not but several admins saw its as nothing other than a punitive call down block. This was further confirmed when Deskana stated that the block was not for . To make it even funnier, SteveCrossin (whilst using PeterSymonds account) reviewed one of my block requests (denying it) and protected my talk page. I was acquainted with Steve. The final slap in the face was when MBisanz removed my rollback and account creator rights when my block expires saying I wasn’t trustworthy. This was fixed after allot of begging that I should not have had to done (hence the so called "Feuding" with him as if he did nothing wrong). If that wasn’t enough whilst I was blocked I was talking about what I was going to in re to: Deskana when I got unblocked since everyone was asking, At the mention of possible rfc/u I was banned from the IRC server for 24 hours for "Annoying people", funny, no one said I was annoying them but, I went to appeal the block in the op channel and I was told on entry "no" by the same op and also banned. I has to private message a op who I knew was un-biased to get me unblocked. | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Now you have some idea as to why I have become so hostile and bitter toward admins an Misplaced Pages in general. ] ] 13:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
{{ombox | |||
| name = First Edit Day | |||
| image = ] | |||
| imageright = ] | |||
| style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(60deg, MistyRose, AntiqueWhite, Ivory, Honeydew, Azure, GhostWhite); | |||
| textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| plainlinks = yes | |||
| text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi Moondyne! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 21:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | }} |
Latest revision as of 21:44, 28 October 2024
If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.
Archives |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of December 2023.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Amazing
just short of 20 years!!! JarrahTree 08:47, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of April 2024.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- Desysop requested and actioned. Moondyne (talk) 14:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Everything for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Everything is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Everything (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Chris Troutman (talk) 16:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wisden Trophy
Wisden Trophy has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Tallaal Adrey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tallaal Adrey is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tallaal Adrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.فيصل (talk) 16:29, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Moondyne! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC) |