| Revision as of 03:11, 17 September 2008 editGRBerry (talk | contribs)16,708 edits →Your removal from GRBerry's RfArb Statement.: response← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,069 edits →Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (541 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Message | |||
| {{Notice|Deja Messages Ici Bitte. I will generally respond to any comments, queries, calumnies or complaints here. Whatever you do, ]}} | |||
| | bgcolor = #gray | |||
| | border-color = #black | |||
| | color = #black | |||
| | linkcolor = #orange | |||
| }} | |||
| {{TOCleft}} | |||
| -------------- | -------------- | ||
| Line 8: | Line 14: | ||
| #] | #] | ||
| #] | #] | ||
| #] |
#] | ||
| #] | |||
| #]}} | |||
| == |
== January 2023 == | ||
| Hi. I don't know whether you remember the ''']'''? I've now put the template up for deletion ''']'''? Thanks. --'']]'' 23:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] Thank you for ] to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from ] into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, ] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an ] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and ] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> ] ] 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Bach== | |||
| == ] moved to draftspace == | |||
| Hi Eusebeus -- Florestan here -- thank you for your backup on that article. I had just now, in the last ten minutes before you posted, pulled a weighty pile of books from my shelf to provide quotations from minor figures like Donald Francis Tovey, Nicolas Slonimsky, and Richard Wagner ("Bach is the most stupendous miracle in music") to back up the five theses nailed to our talk page door. I wonder if I'm wasting my time. The sky still appears to be blue, but the scholars aren't putting it in exactly those words. Maybe we need to rewrite the lead as follows: "Johann Sebastian Bach (1685 (cite) - 1750 (cite) ) was a German (cite) composer (cite) of the late Baroque era (cite). Scholars such as xxx (cite) and xxx (cite) thought his music wasn't bad (cite). He played the organ too (cite). -- OK, I'm glad I wrote that: I'm no longer irritated: I'm laughing. Cheers, ] ] 15:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your contributions to ]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''. | |||
| Thank you Florestan! Oh that was funny! Do you remember the argument that erupted when JSB went through the good article process? It was mighty similar to what you are saying above. Anyway, I have been running my fingers through ''Kinderszenen'' this morning, channeling the inner Eusebeus more than usual and so was happy to intervene again. I have posted to the Composers project page asking for wider input. ] (]) 15:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. | |||
| Please see more information at ]. | |||
| :You've got mail. -- Yes, I like the way they handle it on fr: and de: too, and yes I remember that shocking scene at GA (wasn't there someone who had never heard the term "musicology" and regarded that as a special badge of pride? And yet thought himself qualified to assess the article on matters of content? -- oy.) Been playing (badly) the slow movement of Beethoven's opus 106, which, when properly considered, makes conflicts here look miniscule and amoebic. Cheers, ] ] 22:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ] (]) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ::''(Butting in)'' I think things will ease up at some stage when we get some form of ''show/hide'' switch for inline refs. Funny, but I can completely tune them out. I had a similar argument with ] about bluelinks; he considers them in numbers problematic for reading prose, however, I have really tuned them out too. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 01:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>'''Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| :(to Antandrus) Oh now that's just fucking impressive. Inspired, I tried the same but admit I gave up at about mm 88 as simply too much. But I think you are more the musician than I am. You know that is a VERY interesting movement. If you consider the phrasing, it is SO full of nuance. For example, right at the beginning, the decrescendo at m5 effectively acts as a fermata (even though none is indicated) - but just try playing it in tempo; much the same obtains throughout the movement. Anyway, I am blessed to be in contact with two editors (yes, that means you too Casliber, dammit, don't let it go to your head!, and btw I have some good stuff about the garbage patch to add in) who are so bloody talented. This is why I remain here. Honestly: thanks. ] (]) 03:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| I confess, I have had ] ] ] on the ], although I don't think I have burnt or ruined any just yet...I do recall some talk of moving the name of GPGP to EGP via an email or somesuch. Would this still be prudent? Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 04:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *Yea, I have a lot of shit for you on this point, but I am still accumulating. Don't fear - you are still on the hook ;). ] (]) 04:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| I decided to do an article with more ''gravitas'' than the usual FA fare, and gravitas it has in buckets...all 130kb, luckily it has under 50kb of prose. It has recently had a ] by delldot and looks the better for it. I have gone goggle-eyed at it and am aware of the likelihood of oodles of glitches in the mammoth prose. I as wondering with your aptitude for succinct prose whether there were any ungainly bits that needed a good massage. PS: This is a good example of an article which needs citing to the hilt, all it needs is some antipsychiatry (or pro-psychiatry or god-knows-what-well-anyone-with-a-difference-of-opinion-to-me) person to come along and raise hell. have a look at the talk page and history of ] for a good chuckle...Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 14:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == Your removal from GRBerry's RfArb Statement. == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Please restore the links that you've removed. It is extremely bad form to remove things from other people's statements. If you need to, just put a placeholder statement that "Not all GRBerry's statements deal with TTN.. I do not wish to be mixed in with TTN". But to go out and remove the statement without even asking first, is more provocative then what you claim GRBerry has done. ] (]) 23:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| I have reversed your modification of ]'s statement. Modification of other editors' comments is an extraordinary remedy, which is not employed due to mere disagreement with their contents, or actual factual incorrectness, absent compelling ] concerns or other extreme situations. You are welcome to post your own statement describing your disagreement with ]'s listing of arbitration enforcement archives involving your actions. ] 23:53, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *It doesn't involve me and posting a link to those threads is needless and absurd. ] (]) 00:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :The primary reason I linked them all was to support my main point - that the remedy suggesting everyone come together, sing ], and go implement the new found consensus to fail. The second is to help the arbitrators understand the overall situation. Including them was not about you, but I'll expand my note to clarify. ] 03:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| == Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C == | |||
| <section begin="announcement-content" /> | |||
| :''] '' | |||
| Dear Wikimedian, | |||
| You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process. | |||
| This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. | |||
| The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ]. | |||
| Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well. | |||
| On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" /> | |||
| ] 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list&oldid=26721206 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024
| Please leave a new message. |
 Archives |
January 2023
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jean Jullien into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher)
The article Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,