| Revision as of 14:15, 5 October 2008 editJohn Nevard (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,092 edits i've read your assertation that i have made an 'own admission' that this is not my main account. this is my main account.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:34, 31 July 2021 edit undoHighInBC (talk | contribs)Administrators41,786 edits →Speedy deletion nomination of Atlanta Business Journal | ||
| (313 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| == Tibetan articles == | |||
| | algo = old(15d) | |||
| I saw that you recently had a run-in with my friend Littlebutterfly. I am glad that his racist and propagandist edits are getting more scrutiny from other editors; however I should warn you that he is extremely persistent and tangling with him led to my first and so far only 3RR block. If you have a problem with his changes, and you've reverted him twice, let me or one of the other editors know. ] (]) 15:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| | maxarchivesize = 200K | |||
| | counter = 1 | |||
| | archive = User talk:John Nevard/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| | minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| }} | |||
| {{archive box|search=yes|auto=long}} | |||
| == |
== Thanks == | ||
| <span style="text-decoration:blink">Thank you for your participation in the Dispute Resolution forum— ]</span> | |||
| What is your take on the ] and ] links that {{user|Wogglelump}} added to the ] section? I think that these links are inappropriate in this article and will hurt its quality-improvement status in the future, and I left a comment to that effect on this user's talk page. ] (]) 06:17, 15 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :FYI - The ] link itself is just a link to that same ] link. ] (]) 07:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == john nevard - who is he? == | |||
| == Scientology text == | |||
| Musings: thing is that grips my shit lately is that someone discovers some trivial thing or other and says they 'created' it. This is wrong - there's only one creator and all comes through (him - but dont get hung up about it Im not a belever in womens rights they're left aint too bad mind). Us human beings dont create anything do we? We make a damned mess of most things. No we grow stuff use our time up growing them or building them, we use our hands to paint or to carve or to shape stuff. We dont like assemble the atom and arrange it as a piece of wood or stone or a flower. We select the best stock, time again, to create an animal to produce speed or power or wool or skin or meat or bone. Anything that we make - music, for example has been made before and will be made again. so theres little point really. Anything that we make will eventually end up as dust.<small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> | |||
| Hi John. It looks like you're the author of the passage on Kaja Ballo's suicide on the Scientology page. Thanks for the contribution which i found very well written (except for a minor error which i corrected). Actually, I liked your text so well that I will put it on wikinews. I hope that it's okay with you. If not, don't hesitate to undo it. I will try to give you credit for it (don't know how wikinews works yet). | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| Regards, | |||
| Pharaohmø (just haven't logged in :) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 00:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, John Nevard. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| :No worries. I didn't author the original text concerned, just checked out the source and copyedited and linked some stuff. ] (]) 01:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=866998196 --> | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the ] or ] desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see ] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Atlanta+Business+Journal|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-nocontent-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 19:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
| *re: - No problem. ] (]) 16:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed |1=Blocking a /16 seems rather excessive. |decline = I am unable to see which block you are experiencing. For an admin to review your autoblock you will need to post the information about which /16 block is affecting you. <small>] <small><sup>Need help? ''']'''</sup></small></small> 01:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Re: Hmmm == | |||
| No I've never seen such a suggestion; if you look at the old wikipedia bio up on the internet archive.org (e.g. type <nowiki>"http://en.wikipedia.org/Daniel_Brandt"</nowiki> in , and pick, say, the August 2006 version), it contains sources on him going as far back as his college days, although their pretty marginal sometimes, so your ponderance seems doubtful. Besides, why would someone with the middle name "Leslie" change their ''last'' name? -- ]<sup>]</sup> 22:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Re. ] == | |||
| Are you sure that reference doesn't substantiate the claim it's attached to? ] (]) 12:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Hmm. My bad, I was on a different train of thought. ] (]) 13:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Mayo clinic ref== | |||
| My pleasure.-] (]) 02:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/pdf%2F8204%2F8204sa.pdf. | |||
| :Also, this is repeated 2x in the article after the Tor edits: "Correlational data | |||
| Substantiated cases of child sexual abuse in the US declined dramatically in number between 1992 and (at least) 1998.. A substantial decline also appears to have occurred in Australia. The United Kingdom Children's charity NCH have stated that demand for child pornography on the Internet has led to an increase in sex abuse cases, however the Office for National Statistics's 2007 report on Child Protection Registers shows a decrease of approximately 27% in the number of sexually abused children between 2003 and 2007." | |||
| (The second time it's repeated it includes the Finkelhor study.) I think East meant to protect the page, though--I'm not sure why that didn't show up/will let him know.-] (]) 02:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::That article in particular has gone through so many changes lately I dunno how anyone keeps track of it. :-) -] (]) 02:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Barnstar== | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The''' '''''Porn Star''''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | In regonition of your fine work watching over the CP article- ] (]) 00:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Your report at ] about ] == | |||
| Hello John. You complained about Patrick Byrne's editing at ]. I see that he's been working on a possible revision of the ] article in his user space, but it has no edits since April 6. He's also not edited the main article since May 4. Is there any further action you would like us to take? If not, the report may be closed. ] (]) 16:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==JzG RFAR merged with Cla68-FM-SV case== | |||
| Per the ] the RFAR on ] is now merged with this case and he is a named party. Also see my case disposition notes there. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 21:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == deserves an article == | |||
| ...thought you might like to know, he's now got one. ] (]) 21:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ''Jacobson v. United States'' == | |||
| I reverted your edit to that article not only because, as I said in the edit summary, I don't see how that's directly relevant, but also because of what Gabriel Chin, the Arizona law professor whose paper on the case I relied on heavily when researching and writing the article, says in his footnote that I cited as such (I didn't read the actual Stanley article since it's not online anywhere): | |||
| {{quote|The Stanley article is a well-researched and scholarly argument for the idea that the problem of child pornography had been greatly exaggerated, and that the commercial market had long since dried up. Unfortunately, the credibility of that article has been profoundly impeached by an undisclosed conflict of interest: Mr. Stanley was himself deeply involved with sexual images of children, and actual children, giving rise to numerous scrapes with the law, including some convictions. See Stanley v United States, 932 F Supp 418 (SDNY 1996); Robert Stacy McCain, Porn Lawyer Arrested in Brazil, Charged with Child Exploitation, Wash Times, July 24, 2002.}} | |||
| Other people relied on it at the time. I did add some of this to the article on Stanley. Since that section of the article is relevant to a particular time period in U.S. government prosecution of child pornography, I considered that cite to be clean, as indeed Chin notes it was "well-researched and scholarly". And anyone verifying the source would find the same footnote. Certainly the rise of the Internet changed greatly the circumstances surrounding the creation of child porn, and I doubt that statement is operative anymore. I ''did'', after considering your edit and the talk page section, reword "producer" to "marketer" regarding the US government and childporn.<p>If you think we should have something in the article regarding Stanley's subsequent history suggesting a conflict of interest (as Chin seems to have decided his paper should), I am amenable to putting it in the footnote. ] (]) 16:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Shareaza == | |||
| Ah. Thanks for noting that John. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 10:19, 27 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Byrne == | |||
| Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I haven't been doing much lately on Misplaced Pages and hadn't noticed it either, or if I noticed it I didn't read it too closely. I've responded on Talk:Patrick Byrne. I am still not firmly decided on the issue but my feeling is that since he does not seem to disagree with a full discussion of the investigation, as you want, then so be it. I don't want to be holier than the Pope.--] (]) 01:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Peter Yarrow. == | |||
| Please read then perhaps explain why you think your link should be in the article. ] (]) 05:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == re your comment to ] == | |||
| I would draw your attention to the fact that the above editor has not contributed to Misplaced Pages since 29 June - when they last edited Usana (perhaps they were upset at only getting half a barnstar?). Cheers ] (]) 20:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == My RfA == | |||
| {|style="background-color: #E6E6FA; padding: 3px; border: 1px solid #888;" | |||
| |] | |||
| |style="background-color: #def; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #888;"|Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an ''']''' I will endeavor to maintain the trust you have placed in me. I am honored by your trust and your support. Thank you, ''']''' (]) 02:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Palin== | |||
| Must we have two infoboxes for Palin? I see her name in big bold letters twice instead of once in the infobox(es).] (]) 05:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Semi-protected your userpage == | |||
| John, I have semi-protected your userpage as you are being hit by recurrent AOL IPs vandalising it. It's indefinite for now, another admin or I would be happy to fine-tune it or lift the semi-protection at any point on your request. ] (]) 06:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Removals == | |||
| What's up with removals like this one: ? The edit summary struck me as rather snarky. Notifying editors (even banned ones) of things that might affect them is helpful. ++]: ]/] 19:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :User pages aren't for throwing hissy fits. ] (]) 09:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::That didn't answer the question. I'll be more direct. Your removals were unwarranted. Do not do that again. ++]: ]/] 14:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Well shit. I might just have to stalk a respected admin all over Wikimedia or something. That seems to work. ] (]) 14:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::That makes no sense, can you explain what you actually mean, in a civil and collegial manner, please? ++]: ]/] 14:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: | |||
Latest revision as of 01:34, 31 July 2021
 Archives | |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Thanks
Thank you for your participation in the Dispute Resolution forum— User:Keithbob
john nevard - who is he?
Musings: thing is that grips my shit lately is that someone discovers some trivial thing or other and says they 'created' it. This is wrong - there's only one creator and all comes through (him - but dont get hung up about it Im not a belever in womens rights they're left aint too bad mind). Us human beings dont create anything do we? We make a damned mess of most things. No we grow stuff use our time up growing them or building them, we use our hands to paint or to carve or to shape stuff. We dont like assemble the atom and arrange it as a piece of wood or stone or a flower. We select the best stock, time again, to create an animal to produce speed or power or wool or skin or meat or bone. Anything that we make - music, for example has been made before and will be made again. so theres little point really. Anything that we make will eventually end up as dust.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.26.29 (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, John Nevard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Atlanta Business Journal
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Atlanta Business Journal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JohnThorne (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
John Nevard (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Blocking a /16 seems rather excessive.
Decline reason:
I am unable to see which block you are experiencing. For an admin to review your autoblock you will need to post the information about which /16 block is affecting you. HighInBC 01:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.