| Revision as of 12:21, 14 October 2008 editPedro (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators22,741 edits →Greetings: reply to William← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:13, 2 December 2024 edit undoPedro (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators22,741 editsm archive | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | {{archive box|] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]}}{{clear}} | ||
| {{Statustop}} | |||
| = | |||
| ⚫ | {{archive box|] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]}} | ||
| == Good call == | |||
| on Archiving the discussion on the one RfA...---''']''' '']'' 22:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :But you might want to look at Caspian's latest endeavors...---''']''' '']'' 22:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sigh - that didn't end up very pretty did it? I was optimistically hoping that by archving the discussion it might calm things down - the conversation had seriously moved from being a debate about an oppose to general name calling and tongue poking. Instead it looks like CB just pushed and pushed and forced it to spill over to BN, your talk and Scribe's talk. Template vandal warnings as well....... disappointing. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 07:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==1800 PHONEHOME== | |||
| Hello Pedro...I styled my 1800 PHONEHOME entry much like the 1800 REVERSE entry. | |||
| I have been operational for a short time and have not attracted negative press. Is this what makes the 1800 REVERSE entry acceptable? | |||
| If that has nothing to do with it would you please give me some hints as to how to style the entry. | |||
| Thank you. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:55, 14 October 2008 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :They key thing is to establish ]. 1800 REVERSE seems to be notable when 1800 PHONEHOME isn't. The main problem however was that the phonehome article read more like an advert for the company than a description of why it is notable enough fo rinclusion in an encyclopedia. If you can find some independent third party ] showing why 1800 PHONEHOME is important and notable, and make sure the article is fully ] in tone then that would be fine. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 12:20, 14 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Greetings == | |||
| Hi Pedro, keeping well? As a courtesy, I am just informing you that I endeavour to operate an informal mentoring scheme not dissimilar to yours. While I rarely ''post'' on ], I always have an understanding of its status quo among the community. I'd like to think that many are familiar with my cool and collected disposition among tricky subjects (I think ] is testiment to it), and it is something I look forward to actively extending to ]. Best, <font face="Century Schoolbook">'''] (])'''</font> 11:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Good luck with it. Alas my WP time is more limited than it used to be :( but if you need any help please feel free to tap me up. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 12:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:13, 2 December 2024
=