| Revision as of 17:25, 4 October 2005 editJonah Ayers (talk | contribs)325 edits →Wiki..etc...← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:20, 4 October 2021 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB | ||
| (69 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| All other news found in archive. Thanks, and goodnight. | |||
| ==Welcome and Preview== | |||
| ⚫ | ==Wiki-Stalker== | ||
| * Welcome | |||
| ⚫ | * My Wiki-Stalker is | ||
| * Warning preview | |||
| ⚫ | So, Willmcw followed me around. now I keep a very low profile so he wont revert to his ] of me. I leave this page up for him to see, so he knows he hasn't destroyed my ability to work within the rightful structures of ] and be a non fascisitic editor. If You see a post on here by Willmcw, then you know it is written out of spite and is an attempt to debase anything I've written.02:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| I have removed all postings here to the archive in the spirit of positivity. let's see how long the truce shall last. Credit goes to ] for working with me] 20:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there! Thanks for coming. I'm glad you wantto tell me something. But, please, if I have asked you not to post on my talk page due to your past posts and vandalism, please desist. Everybody else, HI THERE!!!!!! | |||
| ] | |||
| ==Trouble Makers & Vandals== | |||
| * ] ''Wiki-stalker'' | |||
| * ] ''Vandal & Sock Puppet & Vandal'' | |||
| * ] ''Sock Puppet of Sojambi Pinola & Vandal'' | |||
| * ] ''Vandalized my talk page'' | |||
| * ] ''Vandal of talk page'' | |||
| If you post any personal information about a user you will be instantly blocked indefinitely from editing this site. ]]\] 22:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Background of trouble== | |||
| * Overview | |||
| For the past few months I've been involved in some interesting edits of a single page. Why? Because the subject of the page has had his minions come in and write their own opinion of said page, and revert back to that opinion anytime an alternate telling was written. They've made their way to my pages, and have stalked me. Willmcw is an administrator involved in this behavior. He has stalked me and banned others who he said were my ']' leading to a few good editors to have been unable to use the site, and making others so dissastisfied that they left working here altogether. My view of ] is that if you work as a bully, in the case of], and his pal ], then you can express your own opinion in a very ] fashion, i.e. ] sensibility. They like to come to my user page and write things that aren't in the least bit helpful or friendly, and therefore become very antagonistic and anti Wiki in style. I await them. Please leave only positve feedback, all others will be immediately be archived and then erased, as I can only archive so much. | |||
| ==Other News== | |||
| * Recent News | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| In other news, I've been working in the community to help ], and ] in particular help locate the thousands of Jewish ]s from New Orleans, and the ] Region. It's been an uphill battle. Most of the time I've found that oddly enough, it's the more devout and extreme of our religion that have donated space and money to these southern brethren. It's like the diamond district came alive with ]. As my friends know, I wasn't born in ], but moved there shortly after I was born. I grew up there, and attended a catholic school, where I was one of one jewish students. There were a few other religions, but I was the sole Jewish student. Others had gone before me, though in truth, very few. It was an extraordinary experience, but a mostly postive one. I went to ] undergrad, and ] graduate, and landed a job in New York. I would go more into the details of my jobs, but Sojambi Pinola and Willmcw and their friends have proven to be a troubling lot, and have already posted the email address of an unknown ally of mine. Therefore I keep it short. I work in New York. I live in Brooklyn, and I worship there too. | |||
| ==Wiki..etc...== | |||
| * Misplaced Pages problems | |||
| * Revert Wars | |||
| * Antagonism | |||
| Misplaced Pages is an incredible idea. I believe there can be a good amount of growth here, but there seem to be too many negative editors out to inflict their viewpoint and their viewpoint only. I can't say that I'm completely innocent of this, as I learned the ropes of Wiki I learned how other people would manipulate the system. I went and made friends with a few like minded administrators, because it was clear the information about the subject I was writing about was being deleted on an almost hourly basis. Having friends in high places seems to be a key part of the Wiki experience, sadly. So I stopped to have the page frozen until such time as a consensus could be made. That time has never come about. I've actually found that more of my time has been spent defending myself to false allegations lodged by Willmcw and Sojambi Pinola than actual edits of pages other than the original article I worked on. I've stayed far out of their reach on the other points of interests I've worked on, since a rash of ones I did were reverted and reditted by Willmcw and a friend of his hopeseekrxmule- founder of ] battler of ], of who it is said writes a very interesting diary on his offsite journal dealing with weird behavior. Weird, and sad. | |||
| ==Disputed article== | |||
| ⚫ | ==Wiki-Stalker== | ||
| Jonah, you've been reported on ] regarding one or more articles you've created, which are perceived (rightly or wrongly) to have been created for the purposes of harassment. Could I ask you please to consider dropping this issue, regardless of how it started? I'm prepared to discuss this with you by e-mail if you'd like, so please e-mail me using the link on my user page if you'd like to try that. In the meantime, I'd like to delete the recent article that's causing the problem, because I think it's fairly clear the person is non-notable, and the reason for creating it does seem to be related to the dispute between you. Please e-mail me and we can discuss this in detail if you'd like to. Cheers, ] ] 22:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | * My Wiki-Stalker | ||
| ⚫ | So, Willmcw followed me around. now I keep a very low profile so he wont revert to his ] of me. I leave this page up for him to see, so he knows he hasn't destroyed my ability to work within the rightful structures of ] and be a non fascisitic editor. If You see a post on here by Willmcw, then you know it is written out of spite and is an attempt to debase anything I've written.02:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Thanks for your note. You mention the case with Rangerdude; if you saw that, please don't make the same mistakes, because look what ended up happening. In his case, the whole thing seems to have started as a misunderstanding, and maybe there's a similar misunderstanding here, but once these things escalate, they take on a life of their own, and everyone loses. The subject really isn't notable enough, and if he is, someone else will create it. It looks very bad to suddenly create an article on someone you're involved in an on-going dispute with. Would you mind e-mailing me (or posting here if you prefer) with some details? I'd like to try to stop this escalating any further if I can. ] ] 22:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::(edit conflict) Thanks, Jonah. I honestly have no knowledge of the Biff Rose page. I've been asked a couple of times to look at it, but I haven't done it (or at least don't recall doing it), and this was a long time ago. Whatever the dispute is, it's time that it stopped, and I'd like to help with that. I was hoping you could tell me what it is you're trying to achieve that you feel is being thwarted, and we could start from there. ] ] 22:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| Hi, I haven't been following the discussions on ], but I notice you have been making several edits in the last few hours. Please be aware of the 3 Revert Rule. If you revert an article more than three times in a 24 hour period, you can be blocked for 24 hours. Just want to make sure you're aware of the rule. ]|] 05:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ==Personal details== | ||
| Jonah, I would like to try to help sort out the dispute between you and the other editor, but I have to tell you that, if you insert any more personal details about this or any other user into any of the namespaces, including the main namespace, you're likely to be blocked without further warning, perhaps indefinitely. I hope it won't come to that, and that you'll e-mail me and let me know whether I can help to sort things out. ] ] 09:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi again, as you've continued posting personal details, this account has been blocked indefinitely. I'm very willing to unblock if we can come to an agreement that you will stop harassing this user (or doing anything to make him feel he's being harassed). You're welcome to contact me by e-mail if you would like to discuss it. ] ] 01:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::For any admins needing to know the background, see ]. ] ] 01:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==E-mail== | |||
| Jonah, you keep posting with sock puppets to my talk page saying I haven't responded to your e-mail. But I haven't received an e-mail from you. If you genuinely want to discuss the issue, by all means get in touch using the link on my user page. Cheers, ] ] 09:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Non-free use disputed for Image:BbiffRose.jpg== | |||
| ==Remember the Trouble Makers & Vandals== | |||
| * ] ''Wiki-stalker'' | |||
| * ] ''Vandal & Sock Puppet & Vandal'' | |||
| * ] ''Sock Puppet of Sojambi Pinola & Vandal'' | |||
| * ] ''Vandalized my talk page'' | |||
| * ] ''Vandal of talk page'' | |||
| {| align="center" style="background-color: white; border:8px solid red; padding:5px; text-align: center; font-size: larger;" | |||
| |] | |||
| |This file may be '''deleted'''. | |||
| |} | |||
| Thanks for uploading ''']'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at ] and then go to ] and clarify why you think the image qualifies. | |||
| If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:No fair -->] 02:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 10:20, 4 October 2021
All other news found in archive. Thanks, and goodnight.
Wiki-Stalker
- My Wiki-Stalker is
So, Willmcw followed me around. now I keep a very low profile so he wont revert to his wiki-stalking of me. I leave this page up for him to see, so he knows he hasn't destroyed my ability to work within the rightful structures of wikipedia and be a non fascisitic editor. If You see a post on here by Willmcw, then you know it is written out of spite and is an attempt to debase anything I've written.02:35, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
I have removed all postings here to the archive in the spirit of positivity. let's see how long the truce shall last. Credit goes to Derex for working with meJonah Ayers 20:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
If you post any personal information about a user you will be instantly blocked indefinitely from editing this site. FearÉIREANN
\ 22:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Disputed article
Jonah, you've been reported on WP:AN/I regarding one or more articles you've created, which are perceived (rightly or wrongly) to have been created for the purposes of harassment. Could I ask you please to consider dropping this issue, regardless of how it started? I'm prepared to discuss this with you by e-mail if you'd like, so please e-mail me using the link on my user page if you'd like to try that. In the meantime, I'd like to delete the recent article that's causing the problem, because I think it's fairly clear the person is non-notable, and the reason for creating it does seem to be related to the dispute between you. Please e-mail me and we can discuss this in detail if you'd like to. Cheers, SlimVirgin 22:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. You mention the case with Rangerdude; if you saw that, please don't make the same mistakes, because look what ended up happening. In his case, the whole thing seems to have started as a misunderstanding, and maybe there's a similar misunderstanding here, but once these things escalate, they take on a life of their own, and everyone loses. The subject really isn't notable enough, and if he is, someone else will create it. It looks very bad to suddenly create an article on someone you're involved in an on-going dispute with. Would you mind e-mailing me (or posting here if you prefer) with some details? I'd like to try to stop this escalating any further if I can. SlimVirgin 22:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Thanks, Jonah. I honestly have no knowledge of the Biff Rose page. I've been asked a couple of times to look at it, but I haven't done it (or at least don't recall doing it), and this was a long time ago. Whatever the dispute is, it's time that it stopped, and I'd like to help with that. I was hoping you could tell me what it is you're trying to achieve that you feel is being thwarted, and we could start from there. SlimVirgin 22:36, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
3RR
Hi, I haven't been following the discussions on Biff Rose, but I notice you have been making several edits in the last few hours. Please be aware of the 3 Revert Rule. If you revert an article more than three times in a 24 hour period, you can be blocked for 24 hours. Just want to make sure you're aware of the rule. User:Zoe| 05:28, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Personal details
Jonah, I would like to try to help sort out the dispute between you and the other editor, but I have to tell you that, if you insert any more personal details about this or any other user into any of the namespaces, including the main namespace, you're likely to be blocked without further warning, perhaps indefinitely. I hope it won't come to that, and that you'll e-mail me and let me know whether I can help to sort things out. SlimVirgin 09:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hi again, as you've continued posting personal details, this account has been blocked indefinitely. I'm very willing to unblock if we can come to an agreement that you will stop harassing this user (or doing anything to make him feel he's being harassed). You're welcome to contact me by e-mail if you would like to discuss it. SlimVirgin 01:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- For any admins needing to know the background, see here. SlimVirgin 01:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Jonah, you keep posting with sock puppets to my talk page saying I haven't responded to your e-mail. But I haven't received an e-mail from you. If you genuinely want to discuss the issue, by all means get in touch using the link on my user page. Cheers, SlimVirgin 09:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:BbiffRose.jpg
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:BbiffRose.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:42, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
