| Revision as of 18:23, 6 October 2005 editSamuelSpade (talk | contribs)32 edits Taongi← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:10, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,132,848 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (501 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == |
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | ||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| == Re: Deletion == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| You need to create the discussion page. Click on the link to ] either here or on the page, and then enter '''<nowiki>{</nowiki>{subst:afd2|pg=Aidan Coughlan|text=Whatever reason you had to delete the page should go here.}}''' and save the page. Then add '''<nowiki>{</nowiki>{Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aidan Coughlan}}''' to the same page you've edited before. Which part of this was confusing, BTW? ] 06:40, 17 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Re: Ecclesiastical state== | |||
| </div> | |||
| Dear Davidpdx, I had received your message regarding ]. I did not vote '''delete'''. Instead, I voted '''comment''' and suggest that there is a duplicate article which can be redirected. --] 21:28, 25 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| *Davidpdx, I received your message and I concur... My vote has been changed to redirect with a suggested lock.--] 13:56, 26 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| :The submitter of an AFD request doesn't decide when they close. I think they stay up for a minimum of five to seven days or so, and then whenever an admin gets around to looking at them he or she decides the consensus, acts, and closes the discussion. ] 13:37, 29 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == DOM == | |||
| Hi David, took your advice and signed up under Johnski. I've started a subject of Micronation under ] which you can take a look at and let me know what you think so far. Thank you ] 05:11, 19 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi again, David, I'm not sure what parts you want me to prove, so could we take one point at a time? You can look at the talk page of Dominion of Melchizedek and see where I posted a version that I worked from the latest version that was posted there, and compare it to Gene Poole's last version, and let me know the first point you think I should prove. Let's take it one point at a time, otherwise, I'm not sure where to start or what you think needs proving.] 00:13, 30 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hello Davidpdx, I'm disappointed that you couldn't see any of the points I made. Did you sincerely try to understand what I sincerely tried to point out to you? Perhaps you were so prejudiced when you started, it was hard to honestly look at my points or believe any of the evidence I provided. Please at least try to respond to what I wrote in reponse to your last questions. If everything I've written turned out to be true, would that change your thinking? You think that I'm trying to prove that DOM is good? No, just that the article only tells one side of the story and is inacurate, and totally ignores the other side. Is it wrong to to try to bring balance to the article?] 06:04, 4 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == re Ecclesiastical State == | |||
| Hi David. The purpose of an AfD discussion is to determine whether there is a consensus for deletion or not. Regarding the AfD of ], by my reading, there were six editors who were in favor of deleting the article and nine who were not (any recommendation other than delete is a recommendation to keep, for example a redirect is a particular kind of keep). Thus there was clearly no consensus for deletion. And, although there was a majority to keep, it was not large enough (in my view - there is no set amount) to call it a consensus. Nevertheless, a lack of consensus to delete means the article will be kept by default. However the article can still be redirected. And assuming that those editors who recommended deletion would support redirection, there does seem to be a consensus for redirection. However, such a decision is a normal editorial decision and doesn't involve AfD. If you want to redirect the page, you could propose the redirection on the talk page first, or you could be bold and simply redirect, in either case, citing the AfD discussion as justification. Does that make sense? Have I answered you questions? If anything I wrote wasn't clear, or your have other questions, I'd be happy to try and answer them. ] ] 15:14, 3 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :David I've replied on my talk page. ] ] 01:16, 4 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Taongi == | |||
| I think it is much easier to deal with this seperately because it is a much smaller issue than the entire Melchizedek story. Therefore, over here please consider that this version appears to be perfectly factual and balanced, because it has claimed as part of its sovereign territory Taongi and DOM clearly is an entity, aspiring to statehood, that has a history of licensing banks that defaud investors. This gives the counter balance in a polite way, that "The only basis for this claim seems to be related to a 'sovereign master lease' granted by the ] of Taongi Atoll." There is no dispute over whether or not the Iroijlaplap granted such a lease, only the fact as to the meaning of the lease, which should be left for readers to decide without opinions of our writers inserting stuff.SamuelSpade 22:46, 5 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Left this message for you at Taongi talk.] 18:23, 6 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:10, 19 November 2024
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)