Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/STFIL: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:20, 4 November 2008 editDavid Eppstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators225,847 editsm cat← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:47, 9 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ''']''' (]) 00:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}


:{{la|STFIL}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|STFIL}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Non-notable neologism. &mdash; ] (] | ]) 02:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Non-notable neologism. &mdash; ] (] | ]) 02:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
* '''Delete''':Item appears to be a ]. Likely everyone will forget about it after the election, and there's been no reliable coverage of this item. ] ] 02:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC) * '''Delete''':Item appears to be a ]. Likely everyone will forget about it after the election, and there's been no reliable coverage of this item. ] ] 02:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per ]. I have one response for this: ]? <font color="#063">]</font> (<font color="#063">]</font>) 04:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per ]. I have one response for this: ]? ] (]) 04:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - no evidence of widespread usage. - ] (]) 09:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - neoblogism invented all of four days ago. ] (]) 13:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 02:47, 9 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

STFIL

STFIL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable neologism. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.