Revision as of 09:21, 20 November 2008 editClosedmouth (talk | contribs)148,166 editsm Reverted edits by 61.7.178.11 to last version by GMMarques (HG)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:33, 27 December 2024 edit undoBunnysBot (talk | contribs)Bots9,259 editsm Fix CW Errors with GenFixes (T1)Tag: AWB | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Short description|International police organization}} | ||
{{About|an international crime policing organization}} | |||
{{for|the band|Interpol (band)}} | |||
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=March 2017}} | |||
{{Infobox Law enforcement agency | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} | |||
| agencyname = International Criminal Police Organization | |||
{{Infobox law enforcement agency | |||
| commonname = Interpol | |||
| agencyname = {{collapsible list | |||
| abbreviation = ICPO | |||
| titlestyle = text-align:center;line-height:normal;font-size:84%; | |||
| patch = | |||
| title = {{resize|1.23em|International Criminal Police Organization}} | |||
| patchcaption = | |||
| {{Infobox |subbox=yes |bodystyle=font-size:77%;font-weight:normal; | |||
| logo = Interpol logo.png | |||
| rowclass1 = mergedrow| label1 = ]: | data1 = {{lang|ar|منظمة الشرطة الجنائية الدولية|rtl=yes}} | |||
| logocaption = | |||
| rowclass2 = mergedrow| label2 = ]: | data2 = {{lang|fr|Organisation internationale de police criminelle|italic=unset}} | |||
| badge = | |||
| rowclass3 = mergedrow| label3 = ]: | data3 = {{nowrap|{{lang|es|Organización Internacional de Policía Criminal|italic=unset}}}}}}}} | |||
| badgecaption = | |||
| |
| patch = | ||
| |
| patchcaption = | ||
| |
| logo = INTERPOL Logo.svg | ||
| |
| logocaption = | ||
| |
| badge = | ||
| |
| badgecaption = | ||
| |
| flag = Flag of INTERPOL.svg | ||
| |
| flagcaption = | ||
| |
| image_size = | ||
| |
| commonname = Interpol | ||
| |
| abbreviation = ICPO-INTERPOL | ||
| |
| motto = ''Connecting police for a safer world'' | ||
| |
| formed = {{start date and age|df=y|1923|09|07}} | ||
| preceding1 = First International Criminal Police Congress (1914) | |||
| national = | |||
| preceding2 = International Police Conference (1922) | |||
| federal = | |||
| preceding3 = International Criminal Police Commission (1923) | |||
| international = 186 member states | |||
| |
| dissolved = | ||
| |
| superseding = | ||
| |
| employees = 1,050 (2019) | ||
| |
| volunteers = | ||
| |
| budget = €176 million (2023) | ||
| |
| legalpersonality = | ||
| |
| country = | ||
| |
| legaljuris = | ||
| |
| international = 196 member states | ||
| |
| divname = | ||
| |
| subdivname = | ||
| map = | |||
| governingbody = Interpol General Assembly | |||
| mapcaption = | |||
| dmap = | |||
| sizearea = | |||
| sizepopulation = | |||
| governingbody = General Assembly | |||
| governingbodyscnd = | | governingbodyscnd = | ||
| constitution1 = ICPO-INTERPOL Constitution and General Regulations<ref name="Constitution2008" /><ref name="GenReg1956">{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/content/download/23768/225283/version/11/file/02%20e%20gen%20regulations%2025%2011%2014(14y2088)(or).pdf|title=General Regulations of the International Criminal Police Organization |work=Interpol, Office of Legal Affairs|year=1956|access-date=12 March 2016|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160207104642/https://www.interpol.int/content/download/23768/225283/version/11/file/02%20e%20gen%20regulations%2025%2011%2014%2814y2088%29%28or%29.pdf|archive-date=7 February 2016}}</ref> | |||
| constitution1 = | |||
| speciality1 = <!-- up to | speciality6 = --> | |||
| restriction = | |||
| overviewtype = | | overviewtype = | ||
| overviewbody = | | overviewbody = | ||
| headquarters |
| headquarters = ], France | ||
| |
| hqlocmap = | ||
| |
| hqlocmapsize = | ||
| |
| hqlocmappoptitle = | ||
| |
| sworntype = | ||
| |
| sworn = | ||
| |
| unsworntype = | ||
| unsworn = | |||
| chief1name = {{flagicon|Singapore}} ] | |||
| multinational = 130 (2024) | |||
| chief1position = President | |||
| |
| chief1name = ] | ||
| |
| chief1position = ] | ||
| chief2name = ] | |||
| child1agency = | |||
| chief2position = ] | |||
| unittype = | |||
| chief3name = Sarka Havrankova, Garba Baba Umar, Valdecy Urquisa | |||
| unitname = | |||
| |
| chief3position = Vice Presidents | ||
| child1agency = <!-- up to | child7agency = --> | |||
| officename = | |||
| stationtype = National Central Bureau | | stationtype = National Central Bureau | ||
| stations = |
| stations = 196 | ||
| programme1 = <!-- or | program1 = --><!-- up to | programme6 = or | program6 = --> | |||
| lockuptype = | |||
| |
| activitytype = | ||
| activity1name = <!-- up to | activity6name = --> | |||
| vehicle1type = | |||
| |
| anniversary1 = <!-- up to | anniversary6 = --> | ||
| |
| award1 = <!-- up to | award6 = --> | ||
| |
| website = {{official URL}} | ||
| footnotes = {{collapsible list|title=Languages (4)|]|]|]|] }} | |||
| aircraft1type = | |||
| aircraft1 = | |||
| animal1type = | |||
| animals1 = | |||
| website = http://www.interpol.int/ | |||
| footnotes = {{collapsible list |title=languages (4) | ] |] |] |]}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location map | |||
|Earth | |||
|lat = 45.782 | |||
|long = 4.848 | |||
|marksize = 10 | |||
|caption = Location of Interpol headquarters in ], ]. | |||
|float = right | |||
|width = 272 | |||
}} | |||
The '''International Criminal Police Organization''', better known by its ] '''Interpol,''' is an organization facilitating international police cooperation. It was established as the '''International Criminal Police Commission''' in 1923 and adopted its telegraphic address as its name in 1956. It should not be confused with the ], which takes on an active uniformed role in policing war-torn countries. | |||
The '''International Criminal Police Organization – INTERPOL''' (abbreviated as '''ICPO–INTERPOL'''), commonly known as '''Interpol'''<ref name="Name and logo">{{cite web |title=Who we are {{!}} Name and logo |publisher=INTERPOL |url=https://www.interpol.int/Who-we-are/Legal-framework/Name-and-logo |access-date=2024-01-30 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231026233202/https://www.interpol.int/Who-we-are/Legal-framework/Name-and-logo |archive-date=2023-10-26 |url-status=live}}</ref> ({{IPAc-en|UK|ˈ|ɪ|n|t|ər|p|ɒ|l}} {{respell|IN|tər|pol}}, {{IPAc-en|US|-|p|oʊ|l}} {{respell|-|pohl}};<ref>{{cite book |last=Wells |first=John |author-link=John C. Wells |title=Longman Pronunciation Dictionary |publisher=] |location=] |edition=New / Paperback (9th impression) |date=2007 |orig-date=2000 |isbn=978-0-582-36467-7 |page=398 |url=https://archive.org/details/longman-pronunciation-dictionary/page/397/mode/2up?q=Interpol |access-date=2024-01-30 |url-access=limited |via=]}}</ref> stylized in allcaps), is an ] that facilitates worldwide police cooperation and crime control. It is the world's largest international police organization. It is headquartered in ], France, with seven regional bureaus worldwide, and a National Central Bureau in all 196 member states.<ref name="General Secretariat">{{Cite web |title=General Secretariat |url=https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/General-Secretariat |url-status=live |access-date=2020-03-19 |website=www.interpol.int |language=en-US |archive-date=30 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200330124511/https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/General-Secretariat }}</ref> | |||
Its membership of 186 countries provides finance of around ]59 million through annual contributions. (By comparison, ] receives $90 million annually.) The organization's headquarters are in ], ]<!--In History below: , having previously been in ], a town near ]-->. | |||
The organization today known as Interpol was founded on 7 September 1923 at the close of a five-day International Police Congress in ] as the '''International Criminal Police Commission''' ('''ICPC''');<ref>Mathieu Deflem, (Oxford University Press, 2004) p. 125</ref> it adopted many of its current duties throughout the 1930s. After coming under ] control in 1938,<ref name=":0">{{Cite news |title=7. September 1923 – Interpol wird gegründet |language=de |trans-title=September 7, 1923 – Interpol is founded |date=2013-09-07 |work=] |url=https://www1.wdr.de/stichtag/stichtag7776.html |access-date=2022-09-07 |archive-date=7 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220907091259/https://www1.wdr.de/stichtag/stichtag7776.html |url-status=live}}</ref> the agency had its headquarters in the same building as the ].<ref>{{Cite news |title=Opinion {{!}} Interpol's Nazi Affiliations Continued After War |first=Gerald |last=Posner |author-link=Gerald Posner |language=en-US |date=1990-03-06 |newspaper=] |page=A-22 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1990/03/06/opinion/l-interpol-s-nazi-affiliations-continued-after-war-137690.html |access-date=2022-09-07 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=7 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220907072739/https://www.nytimes.com/1990/03/06/opinion/l-interpol-s-nazi-affiliations-continued-after-war-137690.html |url-status=live}}</ref> It was effectively stagnant until the end of ].<ref name=":0" /> In 1956, the ICPC adopted a new constitution and the name Interpol, derived from its ] used since 1946.<ref name="Name and logo"/> | |||
Its current Secretary-General is ], formerly of the ]. Noble is the first non-European to hold the position of Secretary-General. | |||
], National Commissioner of the ], was president from 2004 but resigned on January 13, later being charged in South Africa on three counts of corruption and one of defeating the course of justice. He was replaced by ], current National Commissioner of ''Policía de Investigaciones de ]'' and former Vicepresident for the American Zone, who remained acting president until the organization meeting in October 2008<ref> </ref>, and was subsequently replaced by National Commissioner of the ], ]. | |||
Interpol provides investigative support, expertise and training to law enforcement worldwide, focusing on three major areas of ]: ], ] and ]. Its broad mandate covers virtually every kind of crime, including ], ], ] and production, ], ], as well as ].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sweet O.C. |first1=David |title=INTERPOL DVI best-practice standards—An overview |journal=Forensic Science International |date=September 2010 |volume=201 |issue=1–3 |pages=18–21 |id={{ProQuest|1034458337}} |doi=10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.031 |pmid=20303223 }}</ref> The agency also facilitates cooperation among national law enforcement institutions through criminal databases and communications networks. Contrary to popular belief, Interpol is itself not a ]. | |||
In order to maintain as politically neutral a role as possible, Interpol's ] forbids its involvement in crimes that do not overlap several member countries,<ref> </ref> or in any political, military, religious, or racial crimes.<ref> . ICPO constitution, article 3.</ref> Its work focuses primarily on public safety, ], ], ], ] production, ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. | |||
Interpol has an annual budget of €142 million ($155 million), most of which comes from annual contributions by member police forces in 181 countries. It is governed by a General Assembly composed of all member countries, which elects the executive committee and the President (currently ] of the ]) to supervise and implement Interpol's policies and administration. Day-to-day operations are carried out by the ], comprising around 1,000 personnel from over 100 countries, including both police and civilians. The Secretariat is led by the Secretary-General, currently ], the former Vice President of Interpol for the Americas.<ref name="2025-2030 sg">{{cite web |title=INTERPOL Executive Committee selects Brazil's Valdecy Urquiza as its candidate for next Secretary General |url=https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2024/INTERPOL-Executive-Committee-selects-Brazil-s-Valdecy-Urquiza-as-its-candidate-for-next-Secretary-General |website=interpol.int |date=25 June 2024}}</ref> | |||
In 2005, the Interpol General Secretariat employed a staff of 502, representing 78 member countries. Women comprised 42 percent of the staff. The received an average of 2.2 million page visits every month. Interpol's ]s that year led to the arrests of 3,500 people. | |||
Pursuant to its ], Interpol seeks to remain ] in fulfilling its mandate, and is thus barred from interventions or activities that are political, military, religious, or racial in nature and from involving itself in disputes over such matters.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/Legal-materials/Neutrality-Article-3-of-the-Constitution|title=Neutrality (Article 3 of the Constitution)|publisher=INTERPOL|access-date=31 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170331115209/https://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/Legal-materials/Neutrality-Article-3-of-the-Constitution|archive-date=31 March 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref> The agency operates in four languages: ], ], ] and ].<ref name="General Secretariat" /> | |||
== History == | == History == | ||
Until the 19th century, cooperation among police in different national and political jurisdictions was organized largely on an “ad hoc” basis, focused on a specific goal or criminal enterprise.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Gerspacher |first=Nadia |date=2008 |title=The history of international police cooperation: a 150-year evolution in trends and approaches |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17440570701862892 |journal=Global Crime |language=en |volume=9 |issue=1–2 |pages=169–184 |doi=10.1080/17440570701862892 |s2cid=154119454 |issn=1744-0572}}</ref> The earliest attempt at a formal, permanent framework for international police coordination was the ], formed in 1851 to bring together police from various German-speaking states. Its activities were centered mostly on political dissidents and criminals. A similar plan was launched by Italy in the ], which brought delegates from 21 European countries to create a formal structure for addressing the international anarchist movement. Neither the conference nor its follow up meeting in St. Petersburg in 1904 yielded results. | |||
Interpol was founded in ] in 1923 as the International Criminal Police (ICP). Following the '']'' (Austria's annexation by Nazi Germany) in 1938, the organization fell under the control of ] and the Commission's headquarters were eventually moved to ] in 1942. It is unclear, however, if and to what extent the ICPC files were used to further the goals of the Nazi regime. | |||
], France]] | |||
The early 20th century saw several more efforts to formalize international police cooperation, as growing international travel and commerce facilitated transnational criminal enterprises and fugitives of the law.<ref name="Deflem1">{{Cite journal| doi = 10.2307/3115142| jstor = 3115142| url = https://deflem.blogspot.com/2000/12/bureaucratization-and-social-control.html| title = Bureaucratization and Social Control: Historical Foundations of International Police Cooperation| journal = Law & Society Review| volume = 34| issue = 3| pages = 739–778| year = 2000| last1 = Deflem| first1 = M.| access-date = 29 April 2021| archive-date = 29 April 2021| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210429094508/https://deflem.blogspot.com/2000/12/bureaucratization-and-social-control.html| url-status = live}}</ref> The earliest was the International Criminal Police Congress hosted by ] in 1914, which brought diplomats and legal officials from two dozen countries to discuss international cooperation in investigating crimes, sharing investigative techniques, and extradition procedures.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/Who-we-are/Our-history/12-wishes-then-and-now|title=12 wishes: then and now|website=www.interpol.int|access-date=20 March 2020|archive-date=19 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200319215250/https://www.interpol.int/Who-we-are/Our-history/12-wishes-then-and-now|url-status=live}}</ref> The Monaco Congress laid out twelve principles and priorities that would eventually become foundational to Interpol, including providing direct contact between police in different nations; creating an international standard for forensics and data collection; and facilitating the efficient processing of extradition requests. The idea of an international police organization remained dormant due to the First World War. The United States attempted to lead a similar effort in 1922 through the International Police Conference in New York City, but it failed to attract international attention.<ref name="Deflem12">{{Cite journal|last1=Deflem|first1=M.|year=2000|title=Bureaucratization and Social Control: Historical Foundations of International Police Cooperation|url=https://deflem.blogspot.com/2000/12/bureaucratization-and-social-control.html|journal=Law & Society Review|volume=34|issue=3|pages=739–778|doi=10.2307/3115142|jstor=3115142|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=29 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210429094508/https://deflem.blogspot.com/2000/12/bureaucratization-and-social-control.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
A year later, in 1923, a new initiative was undertaken at another International Criminal Police Congress in ], spearheaded by ], President of the Viennese Police Department. The 22 delegates agreed to found the International Criminal Police Commission (ICPC), the direct forerunner of Interpol, which would be based in Vienna. Founding members included police officials from Austria, Germany, Belgium, Poland, China, Egypt, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland and ].<ref name="faq">{{cite web|url=https://www.fairtrials.org/documents/Interpol_-_FAQs.pdf|title=Interpol: Frequently Asked Questions|work=]|date=November 2011|access-date=31 March 2017|archive-date=25 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170325235108/https://www.fairtrials.org/documents/Interpol_-_FAQs.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> The same year, wanted person notices were first published in the ICPCs International Public Safety Journal. The United Kingdom joined in 1928.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/Member-countries/Europe/United-Kingdom|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111004152447/http://www.interpol.int/Member-countries/Europe/United-Kingdom|url-status=dead|archive-date=4 October 2011|title=Interpol Member States: The United Kingdom|publisher=Interpol|access-date=17 August 2012}}</ref> The United States did not join Interpol until 1938, although a U.S. police officer unofficially attended the 1923 congress.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/Member-countries/Americas/United-States|title=Interpol Member States: The United States|publisher=Interpol|access-date=5 January 2012|archive-date=17 December 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111217065150/http://www.interpol.int/Member-countries/Americas/United-States|url-status=dead}}</ref> By 1934, the ICPC’s membership more than doubled to 58 nations. | |||
Following the '']'' in 1938, the Vienna-based organization fell under the control of ]; on November 29, 1941, Interpol had offices at ''Am Kleinen Wannsee 16'';<ref> | |||
*{{cite web |title=Key dates |url=https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/INTERPOL-100/Key-dates |website=] |access-date=15 September 2023 |language=en}} | |||
*{{cite book | last = Roseman | first = Mark | author-link = Mark Roseman | title = The Villa, The Lake, The Meeting: Wannsee and the Final Solution | year = 2002 | publisher = Allen Lane | location = London |page=57 | isbn = 978-0-71-399570-1 }} | |||
*Published in the United States as ''The Wannsee Conference and the Final Solution: A Reconsideration''. New York: Picador, 2002. | |||
</ref> the commission’s headquarters were eventually moved to ] in 1942.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Deflem|first=Mathieu|title=The Logic of Nazification: The Case of the International Criminal Police Commission ('Interpol')|journal=International Journal of Comparative Sociology|volume=43|issue=1|year=2002|page=21|url=https://deflem.blogspot.com/2002/02/logic-of-nazification-case-of.html|doi=10.1177/002071520204300102|s2cid=145091279|access-date=31 March 2017|archive-date=25 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170325235110/http://deflem.blogspot.com/2002/02/logic-of-nazification-case-of.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Most member states withdrew their support during this period.<ref name="faq" /> From 1938 to 1945, the presidents of the ICPC included ], ], ] and ]. All were generals in the '']'' (SS); Kaltenbrunner was the highest-ranking SS officer executed following the ]. | |||
In 1946, after the end of ], the organization was revived as the International Criminal Police Organization (ICPO) by officials from Belgium, France, ], the United States and the United Kingdom. Its new headquarters were established in Paris, then from 1967 in ], a Parisian suburb. They remained there until 1989 when they were moved to their present location in ]. | |||
Until the 1980s, Interpol did not intervene in the prosecution of ] in accordance with Article 3 of its ], which prohibited intervention in "political" matters.<ref>{{Cite journal | last1 = Barnett | first1 = M. | last2 = Coleman | first2 = L. | doi = 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00380.x | title = Designing Police: INTERPOL and the Study of Change in International Organizations | journal = International Studies Quarterly | volume = 49 | issue = 4 | page = 593 | year = 2005 | doi-access = free }}</ref> | |||
On May 10, 2023, ] was launched.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2023-05-10 |title=Police search for the names of 22 women murdered |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65456183 |access-date=2023-05-10 |archive-date=10 May 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230510194524/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-65456183 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
== Constitution == | |||
The role of Interpol is defined by the general provisions of its constitution.<ref name="Constitution2008">{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/content/download/9429/69209/version/9/file/Constitution.pdf|title=Constitution of the International Criminal Police Organization |publisher=INTERPOL|year=1956|access-date=12 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160222055903/https://www.interpol.int/content/download/9429/69209/version/9/file/Constitution.pdf|archive-date=22 February 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
Article 2 states that its role is: | |||
{{blockquote| | |||
# To ensure and promote the widest possible mutual assistance between all criminal police authorities within the limits of the laws existing in the different countries and in the spirit of the ]. | |||
# To establish and develop all institutions likely to contribute effectively to the prevention and suppression of ordinary law crimes.}} | |||
Article 3 states: | |||
After the end of ] in 1945, the organization was revived, as the International Criminal Police Organization, by European ] officials from ], ], ] and the ]. Its new headquarters were established in ], a town on the outskirts of ]. They remained there until 1989, when they were moved to their present location, ]. | |||
{{blockquote|It is strictly forbidden for the Organization to undertake any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial character.}} | |||
== Methodology == | == Methodology == | ||
Contrary to the common idea due to frequent portrayals in popular media, Interpol is not a ] enforcement agency and has no agents with arresting powers. Instead, it is an international organization that functions as a network of law enforcement agencies from different countries.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Gilsinan |first=Kathy |date=2014-05-12 |title=Interpol at 100: Does the World's Police Force Work? |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/05/interpol-the-global-police-force-that-isnt/362086/ |access-date=2022-04-07 |website=The Atlantic |language=en |archive-date=16 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230416134627/https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/05/interpol-the-global-police-force-that-isnt/362086/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Lee |first=Michael |title=Interpol hopes physical border security will solve virtual borders |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/interpol-hopes-physical-border-security-will-solve-virtual-borders/ |access-date=2022-04-07 |website=ZDNet |language=en |archive-date=29 January 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230129045835/https://www.zdnet.com/article/interpol-hopes-physical-border-security-will-solve-virtual-borders/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The organization thus functions as an administrative liaison among the law enforcement agencies of the member countries, providing communications and database assistance, mostly through its central headquarters in Lyon,<ref>{{Cite book | doi = 10.1093/acref/9780195176322.001.0001| title = Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World| year = 2008| isbn = 978-0-19-517632-2| last1 = Stearns| first1 = Peter N.}}</ref> along with the assistance of smaller local bureaus in each of its member states. | |||
] | |||
Interpol's databases at the Lyon headquarters can assist law enforcement in fighting international crime.<ref name="Encyclopedia of Global Studies">{{cite book |author1=Helmut K. Anheier |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gX2pjgEACAAJ |title=Encyclopedia of Global Studies |author2=Mark Juergensmeyer |publisher=SAGE Publications |year=2012 |isbn=978-1-4129-6429-6 |pages=956–958 |author-link1=Helmut Anheier |author-link2=Mark Juergensmeyer}}</ref> While national agencies have their own extensive crime databases, the information rarely extends beyond one nation's borders. Interpol's databases can track criminals and crime trends around the world, specifically by means of authorized collections of fingerprints and face photos, lists of wanted persons, DNA samples, and travel documents. Interpol's lost and stolen travel document database alone contains more than 12 million records. Officials at the headquarters also analyze this data and release information on crime trends to the member countries. | |||
Each member country maintains a National Central Bureau (NCB) staffed by national law enforcement officers. The NCB is the designated contact point for the Interpol General Secretariat, regional bureaus and other member countries requiring assistance with overseas investigations and the location and apprehension of fugitives. This is especially important in countries which have many law-enforcement agencies: this central bureau is a unique point of contact for foreign entities, which may not understand the complexity of the law-enforcement system of the country they attempt to contact. For instance, the NCB for the ] is housed at the ] (DOJ). The NCB will then ensure the proper transmission of information to the correct agency. | |||
An encrypted Internet-based worldwide communications network allows Interpol agents and member countries to contact each other at any time. Known as I-24/7, the network offers constant access to Interpol's databases.<ref name="Encyclopedia of Global Studies" /> While the National Central Bureaus are the primary access sites to the network, some member countries have expanded it to key areas such as airports and border access points. Member countries can also access each other's criminal databases via the I-24/7 system. | |||
Interpol maintains a large database charting unsolved crimes and both convicted and alleged criminals. At any time, a member nation has access to specific sections of the database and its police forces are encouraged to check information held by Interpol whenever a major crime is committed. The rationale behind this is that ] and similar criminals have international ties, and so it is likely that crimes will extend beyond political boundaries. | |||
Interpol issues eight types of ]s, seven of which are: red, blue, green, yellow, black, orange, and purple. An eighth special notice is issued at the special request of the ].<ref>{{cite web |title=About Notices |url=https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/About-Notices |website=www.interpol.int |access-date=10 June 2023 |language=en}}</ref> {{as of|2019}}, there are currently 62,448 valid Red and 12,234 Yellow notices in circulation.<ref name="2019 Annual Report">{{cite report |title=Annual Report 2019 |url=https://www.interpol.int/en/content/download/15456/file/INTERPOL_Annual%20Report%202019_EN.pdf |publisher=INTERPOL |access-date=1 March 2021}}</ref> | |||
In 2002, following ] passed in the aftermaths of ], Interpol began maintaining a database of lost and stolen identification and travel documents, allowing member countries to be alerted to the true nature of such documents when presented. Passport fraud, for example, is often performed by altering a stolen passport; in response, several member countries have worked to make online queries into the stolen document database part of their standard operating procedure in ] departments. As of early 2006, the database contained over ten million identification items reported lost or stolen, and is expected to grow more as more countries join the list of those reporting into the database. | |||
In the event of an international disaster, terrorist attack, or assassination, Interpol can send an Incident Response Team (IRT). IRTs can offer a range of expertise and database access to assist with victim identification, suspect identification, and the dissemination of information to other nations' law enforcement agencies. In addition, at the request of local authorities, they can act as a central command and logistics operation to coordinate other law enforcement agencies involved in a case. Such teams were deployed eight times in 2013. Interpol began issuing ] in 2009 with hopes that nations would remove visa requirements for individuals travelling for Interpol business, thereby improving response times.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2009/PR093|title=INTERPOL issues its first-ever passports|date=13 October 2009|publisher=INTERPOL|location=Singapore|access-date=9 July 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150112165732/https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2009/PR093|archive-date=12 January 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> In September 2017, the organization voted to accept ] and the ] as members.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/palestinians/1.814540|title=Interpol Votes to Accept 'State of Palestine' as Member Country|last=Ravid|first=Barak|date=27 September 2017|work=Haaretz|access-date=27 September 2017|archive-date=27 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170927094706/https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/palestinians/1.814540|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
A member nation's police force can contact one or more member nations by sending a message relayed through Interpol offices. | |||
== {{Anchor|Foundation}}Finances == | |||
In some works of fiction, Interpol officers are seen conducting investigations in member countries. However, this is a highly fictionalized version of the operations of Interpol. Its main role is the passing on of information, not actual law enforcement. | |||
In 2019, Interpol's operating income was €142 million, of which 41 percent were statutory contributions by member countries, 35 percent were voluntary cash contributions and 24 percent were in-kind contributions for the use of equipment, services and buildings.<ref name="2019 Annual Report" /> With the goal of enhancing the collaboration between Interpol and the private sector to support Interpol's missions, the Interpol Foundation for a Safer World was created in 2013. Although legally independent of Interpol, the relationship between the two is close enough for Interpol's president to obtain in 2015 the departure of ] CEO from the foundation board after the ] allegations.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/interpol-foundation-shows-hsbc-boss-the-door/41289120 |title=Interpol foundation shows HSBC boss the door |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=24 February 2015 |website=swissinfo.ch |publisher=] |access-date=22 March 2018 |archive-date=23 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180323030700/https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/interpol-foundation-shows-hsbc-boss-the-door/41289120 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
From 2004 to 2010, Interpol's ] was the French ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/content/download/5431/45490/version/4/file/AGN73RES05.pdf|title=AG-2004-RES-05: Appointment of Interpol External Auditor|publisher=INTERPOL|location=Cancún|date=8 October 2004|access-date=31 March 2017|archive-date=31 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170331114957/https://www.interpol.int/content/download/5431/45490/version/4/file/AGN73RES05.pdf|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/interpol/faq-eng.htm|title=Questions and Answers: What is Canada's financial contribution to INTERPOL?|publisher=]|date=17 March 2010|access-date=31 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170325234724/https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/interpol/faq-eng.htm#contribution|archive-date=25 March 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref> In November 2010, the Court of Audit was replaced by the ] for a three-year term with an option for a further three years.<ref name="2011 Financial Statements">{{cite web |url=https://www.interpol.int/content/download/14662/102783/version/2/file/FinancialStatement2011.pdf |title=Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2011 |publisher=Interpol|date=25 May 2012 |access-date=9 July 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150320114802/https://www.interpol.int/content/download/14662/102783/version/2/file/FinancialStatement2011.pdf |archive-date=20 March 2015 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.riksrevisjonen.no/en/InternationalActivities/AudAssignOutplace/Pages/InternationalAuditAssignmentsAndOutplacement.aspx |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130701225050/http://www.riksrevisjonen.no/en/InternationalActivities/AudAssignOutplace/Pages/InternationalAuditAssignmentsAndOutplacement.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-date=1 July 2013 |title=Audit assignments and secondments |website=Riksrevisjonen – Office of the Auditor General of Norway |access-date=1 July 2013}}</ref> | |||
== Member states and sub-bureaux == | |||
Sub-bureaux shown in ''italics''. | |||
<div style="font-size:95%;"> | |||
{{columns |width=200px | |||
|col1 = | |||
{{flag|Afghanistan}}<br /> {{flag|Albania}}<br /> {{flag|Algeria}}<br /> ''{{flag|American Samoa}}''<br /> {{flag|Andorra}}<br /> {{flag|Angola}}<br /> ''{{flag|Anguilla}}''<br /> {{flag|Antigua and Barbuda}}<br /> {{flag|Argentina}}<br /> {{flag|Armenia}}<br /> {{flag|Aruba}}<br /> {{flag|Australia}}<br /> {{flag|Austria}}<br /> {{flag|Azerbaijan}}<br /> {{flag|Bahamas}}<br /> {{flag|Bahrain}}<br /> {{flag|Bangladesh}}<br /> {{flag|Barbados}}<br /> {{flag|Belarus}}<br /> {{flag|Belgium}}<br /> {{flag|Belize}}<br /> {{flag|Benin}}<br /> ''{{flag|Bermuda}}''<br /> {{flag|Bhutan}}<br /> {{flag|Bolivia}}<br /> {{flag|Bosnia and Herzegovina}}<br /> {{flag|Botswana}}<br /> {{flag|Brazil}}<br /> ''{{flag|British Virgin Islands}}''<br /> {{flag|Brunei}}<br /> {{flag|Bulgaria}}<br /> {{flag|Burkina Faso}}<br /> {{flag|Burundi}}<br /> {{flag|Cambodia}}<br /> {{flag|Cameroon}}<br /> {{flag|Canada}}<br /> {{flag|Cape Verde}}<br /> ''{{flag|Cayman Islands}}''<br /> {{flag|Central African Republic}}<br /> {{flag|Chad}}<br /> {{flag|Chile}}<br /> {{flag|China|China(ROC)}}<br /> {{flag|Colombia}}<br /> {{flag|Comoros}}<br />{{flag|Republic of the Congo}}<br /> {{flag|Democratic Republic of the Congo|name=Congo (Democratic Rep.)}}<br /> {{flag|Costa Rica}}<br /> {{flag|Côte d'Ivoire}}<br /> {{flag|Croatia}}<br /> {{flag|Cuba}} | |||
|col2 = | |||
{{flag|Cyprus}}<br /> {{flag|Czech Republic}}<br /> {{flag|Denmark}}<br /> {{flag|Djibouti}}<br /> {{flag|Dominica}}<br /> {{flag|Dominican Republic}}<br /> {{flag|East Timor}}<br /> {{flag|Ecuador}}<br /> {{flag|Egypt}}<br /> {{flag|El Salvador}}<br /> {{flag|Equatorial Guinea}}<br /> {{flag|Eritrea}}<br /> {{flag|Estonia}}<br /> {{flag|Ethiopia}}<br /> {{flag|Fiji}}<br /> {{flag|Finland}}<br /><!-- DO NOT MOVE this entry from its current location. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYR Macedonia) is alphabetized under "f" in between Finland and France. Official INTERPOL website http://www.interpol.int/Public/ICPO/Members/default.asp, see also ] --> {{flag|France}}<br /> {{flag|Gabon}}<br /> {{flag|Gambia}}<br /> {{flag|Georgia}}<br /> {{flag|Germany}}<br /> {{flag|Ghana}}<br /> ''{{flag|Gibraltar}}''<br /> {{flag|Greece}}<br /> {{flag|Grenada}}<br /> {{flag|Guatemala}}<br /> {{flag|Guinea}}<br /> {{flag|Guinea-Bissau}}<br /> {{flag|Guyana}}<br /> {{flag|Haiti}}<br /> {{flag|Honduras}}<br /> ''{{flag|Hong Kong}}''<br /> {{flag|Hungary}}<br /> {{flag|Iceland}}<br /> {{flag|India}}<br /> {{flag|Indonesia}}<br /> {{flag|Iran}}<br /> {{flag|Iraq}}<br /> {{flag|Ireland}}<br /> {{flag|Israel}}<br /> {{flag|Italy}}<br /> {{flag|Jamaica}}<br /> {{flag|Japan}}<br /> {{flag|Jordan}}<br /> {{flag|Kazakhstan}}<br /> {{flag|Kenya}}<br /> {{flag|Republic of Korea}}<br /> {{flag|Kuwait}}<br /> {{flag|Kyrgyzstan}}<br /> {{flag|Laos}} | |||
|col3 = | |||
{{flag|Latvia}}<br /> {{flag|Lebanon}}<br /> {{flag|Lesotho}}<br /> {{flag|Liberia}}<br /> {{flag|Libya}}<br /> {{flag|Liechtenstein}}<br /> {{flag|Lithuania}}<br /> {{flag|Luxembourg}}<br /> ''{{flag|Macau}}''<br /> {{flag|Republic of Macedonia|name=Macedonia}}<br /> {{flag|Madagascar}}<br /> {{flag|Malawi}}<br /> {{flag|Malaysia}}<br /> {{flag|Maldives}}<br /> {{flag|Mali}}<br /> {{flag|Malta}}<br /> {{flag|Marshall Islands}}<br /> {{flag|Mauritania}}<br /> {{flag|Mauritius}}<br /> {{flag|Mexico}}<br /> {{flag|Moldova}}<br /> {{flag|Monaco}}<br /> {{flag|Mongolia}}<br /> {{flag|Montenegro}}<br /> ''{{flag|Montserrat}}''<br /> {{flag|Morocco}}<br /> {{flag|Mozambique}}<br /> {{flag|Myanmar}}<br /> {{flag|Namibia}}<br /> {{flag|Nauru}}<br /> {{flag|Nepal}}<br /> {{flag|Netherlands}}<br /> {{flag|Netherlands Antilles}}<br /> {{flag|New Zealand}}<br /> {{flag|Nicaragua}}<br /> {{flag|Niger}}<br /> {{flag|Nigeria}}<br /> {{flag|Norway}}<br /> {{flag|Oman}}<br /> {{flag|Pakistan}}<br /> {{flag|Panama}}<br /> {{flag|Papua New Guinea}}<br /> {{flag|Paraguay}}<br /> {{flag|Peru}}<br /> {{flag|Philippines}}<br /> {{flag|Poland}}<br /> {{flag|Portugal}}<br /> ''{{flag|Puerto Rico}}''<br /> {{flag|Qatar}}<br /> {{flag|Romania}} | |||
|col4 = | |||
{{flag|Russia}}<br /> {{flag|Rwanda}}<br /> {{flag|Saint Kitts and Nevis|name=St. Kitts and Nevis}}<br /> {{flag|Saint Lucia|name=St. Lucia}}<br /> {{flag|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines|name=St. Vincent and the Grenadines}}<br /> {{flag|São Tomé and Príncipe}}<br /> {{flag|Saudi Arabia}}<br /> {{flag|San Marino}}<br /> {{flag|Senegal}}<br /> {{flag|Serbia}}<br /> {{flag|Seychelles}}<br /> {{flag|Sierra Leone}}<br /> {{flag|Singapore}}<br /> {{flag|Slovakia}}<br /> {{flag|Slovenia}}<br /> {{flag|Somalia}}<br /> {{flag|South Africa}}<br /> {{flag|Spain}}<br /> {{flag|Sri Lanka}}<br /> {{flag|Sudan}}<br /> {{flag|Suriname}}<br /> {{flag|Swaziland}}<br /> {{flag|Sweden}}<br /> {{flag|Switzerland}}<br /> {{flag|Syria}}<br /> {{flag|Tajikistan}}<br /> {{flag|Tanzania}}<br /> {{flag|Thailand}}<br /> {{flag|Togo}}<br /> {{flag|Tonga}}<br /> {{flag|Trinidad and Tobago}}<br /> {{flag|Tunisia}}<br /> {{flag|Turkey}}<br /> ''{{flag|Turks and Caicos Islands|name=Turks and Caicos}}''<br /> {{flag|Turkmenistan}}<br /> {{flag|Uganda}}<br /> {{flag|Ukraine}}<br /> {{flag|United Arab Emirates}}<br /> {{flag|United Kingdom}}<br /> {{flag|United States}}<br /> {{flag|Uruguay}}<br /> {{flag|Uzbekistan}}<br /> {{flag|Vatican City}} <br />{{flag|Venezuela}}<br /> {{flag|Vietnam}}<br /> {{flag|Yemen}}<br /> {{flag|Zambia}}<br /> {{flag|Zimbabwe}} | |||
}} | |||
</div><!--(font-size)--> | |||
== Offices == | |||
===Non-member countries=== | |||
In addition to its General Secretariat headquarters in Lyon, Interpol maintains six regional bureaus and three special representative offices:<ref>{{cite web |title=General Secretariat |url=https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/General-Secretariat |publisher=Interpol |access-date=28 November 2024 |language=en }}</ref> | |||
<div style="font-size:95%;"> | |||
{{div col|colwidth=40em}} | |||
{{flag|Samoa}}<br /> | |||
* ], Argentina | |||
{{flag|Palau}}<br /> | |||
* ], Belgium (special representative office to the ]) | |||
{{flag|Solomon Islands}} | |||
* ], Cameroon | |||
* ], Côte d'Ivoire | |||
* ], El Salvador | |||
* ], Ethiopia (special representative office to the ]) | |||
* ], Kenya | |||
* ], United States (special representative office to the ]){{efn|Interpol also maintains a liaison office to the ] in ]}} | |||
* ], Zimbabwe | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
Interpol's Command and Coordination Centres offer a 24-hour point of contact for national police forces seeking urgent information or facing a crisis. The original is in Lyon with a second in Buenos Aires added in September 2011. A third was opened in Singapore in September 2014.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.interpol.int/INTERPOL-expertise/Command-Coordination-Centre |title=Command & Coordination Centre |publisher=Interpol |access-date=9 July 2013 |archive-date=18 August 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130818094524/http://www.interpol.int/INTERPOL-expertise/Command-Coordination-Centre |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
{{flag|Kiribati}}<br /> | |||
{{flag|Federated States of Micronesia}}<br /> | |||
{{flag|Tuvalu}}<br /> | |||
{{flag|Vanuatu}} | |||
Interpol opened a Special Representative Office to the UN in New York City in 2004<ref>{{cite news |title=Order on Interpol Work Inside U.S. Irks Conservatives |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/31/world/31interpol.html |work=] |location=New York |date=30 December 2009 |access-date=24 February 2017 |archive-date=25 March 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170325234559/http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/31/world/31interpol.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and to the EU in Brussels in 2009.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2009/PR086 |title=Official opening of Interpol's office of its Special Representative to the European Union marks milestone in co-operation |publisher=Interpol |location=Brussels |date=25 September 2009 |access-date=9 July 2013 |archive-date=24 November 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161124155736/https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2009/PR086 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
{{flag|North Korea}}<br /> | |||
The organization has constructed the Interpol Global Complex for Innovation (IGCI) in Singapore to act as its ] facility, and a place of cooperation on digital crimes investigations. It was officially opened in April 2015, but had already become active beforehand. Most notably, a worldwide takedown of the SIMDA botnet infrastructure was coordinated and executed from IGCI's Cyber Fusion Centre in the weeks before the opening, as was revealed at the launch event.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/s-pore-interpol-reaffirm-excellent-partn/684180.html |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130710024419/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/s-pore-interpol-reaffirm-excellent-partn/684180.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=10 July 2013 |title=S'pore, Interpol reaffirm excellent partnership |author=<!--Staff writer(s); no by-line.--> |date=22 May 2013 |publisher=] |location=Singapore |access-date=9 July 2013}}</ref> | |||
</div> | |||
== Leadership == | |||
== Secretaries-general and presidents == | |||
'''Secretaries-general''' since organization's inception in 1923: | |||
{| style="background:transparent; font-size:95%;" | |||
|width="170px"| {{flagicon|Austria}} ] || to 1946</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|France}} ] || to 1951</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|France}} ] || to 1963</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|France}} ] || to 1978</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|France}} ] || to 1985</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|UK}} ] || to 2000</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|USA}} ] || since 2000</tr> | |||
|} | |||
=== Secretaries General === | |||
<br />'''Presidents''' since organization's inception in 1923: | |||
{{main|Secretary General of Interpol}} | |||
{| style="background:transparent;" | |||
|- valign="top" | |||
=== Presidents === | |||
|style="padding-right:30px"| | |||
{{Main|President of Interpol}} | |||
{| style="background:transparent; font-size:95%;" | |||
|width="170px"| {{flagicon|Austria}} ] || to 1932</tr> | |||
==== Paul Dickopf (1968–1972) ==== | |||
| {{flagicon|Austria}} ] || to 1934</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|Austria}} ] || to 1935</tr> | |||
Under the Nazi government of ], ] was a member of the ], ] and the ] before and during ]. | |||
| {{flagicon|Austria}} ] || to 1938</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ] || to 1940</tr> | |||
Dickopf was elected as the president of Interpol in 1968, apparently aided by the good contacts of ] to the Arab world.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Michael Sontheimer |url=http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/gesellschaft/biografie-ueber-fran-ois-genoud-ein-freischaffender-nazi-a-739359.html |title=Ein freischaffender Nazi |journal=Der Spiegel |date=2011-01-14 |accessdate=2024-04-11}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=] |title=Die braunen Wurzeln des BKA |edition=Die Zeit des Nationalsozialismus |publisher=Fischer Taschenbuchverlag |location=Frankfurt am Main |year=2003 |isbn=3-596-15782-X |pages=303}} Schenk cites an unpublished dossier of the weekly journal '']''.</ref> | |||
| {{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ] || to 1942</tr> | |||
While his former Nazi connections were known, he maintained his post until 1972.<ref>{{cite news|last=Posner|first=Gerald|title=Interpol's Nazi Affiliations Continued After War|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1990/03/06/opinion/l-interpol-s-nazi-affiliations-continued-after-war-137690.html|accessdate=12 February 2012|newspaper=The New York Times|date=6 March 1990|authorlink=Gerald Posner|quote=In 1968, Interpol elected Paul Dickopf as its president. Although it was discovered that he had been an SS officer in the war, having worked in the very villa where Interpol and the Gestapo were headquartered, he nevertheless remained president until 1972.}}</ref> | |||
| {{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ] || to 1943</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|Nazi Germany}} ] || to 1945</tr> | |||
==== Jackie Selebi (2004–2008) ==== | |||
| {{flagicon|Belgium}} ] || to 1956</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|Portugal}} ] || to 1960</tr> | |||
After being charged of corruption in January 2008, ] resigned as president of Interpol and was put on extended leave as National Police Commissioner of South Africa.<ref>{{cite news |title=S. African Chief of Police Put on Leave |author=Craig Timberg |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/12/AR2008011202405.html |newspaper=] |location=Rustenburg |date=13 January 2008 |access-date=9 July 2013 |archive-date=11 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141111084152/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/12/AR2008011202405.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| {{flagicon|UK}} ] || to 1963</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|Finland}} ] || to 1964</tr> | |||
In July 2010 Selebi was found guilty of corruption by the ] in Johannesburg for accepting bribes worth €156,000 from a drug trafficker.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2010/07/201072111013944348.html |title=Ex-S Africa police chief convicted |publisher=] |date=2 July 2010 |access-date=30 November 2010 |archive-date=2 November 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121102144130/http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2010/07/201072111013944348.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
| {{flagicon|Belgium}} ] || to 1968</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|West Germany}} ] || to 1972</tr> | |||
==== Khoo Boon Hui (2008–2012) ==== | |||
| {{flagicon|Canada}} ] || to 1976</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|Sweden}} ] || to 1980</tr> | |||
Jackie Selebi was temporarily replaced by {{Ill|Arturo Herrera Verdugo|es}}, the National Commissioner of ] and former vice president for the American Zone, who remained acting president until the appointment of Singaporean ] in October 2008.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2008/PR001|title=INTERPOL President Jackie Selebi resigns from post|date=13 January 2008|publisher=INTERPOL|location=Lyon|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170331115532/https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2008/PR001|archive-date=31 March 2017|access-date=31 March 2017}}</ref> | |||
| {{flagicon|Philippines|1981}} ] || to 1984</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|USA}} ] || to 1988</tr> | |||
==== Mireille Ballestrazzi (2012–2016) ==== | |||
| {{flagicon|France}} ] || to 1992</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|Canada}} ] || to 1994</tr> | |||
On November 8, 2012, the 81st General Assembly closed with the election of Deputy Central Director of the ], ], as the first female president of the organization.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2012/PR090 |title=France's Ballestrazzi becomes first female President of Interpol |publisher=Interpol |location=Rome |date=8 November 2012 |access-date=8 November 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140704034002/https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2012/PR090 |archive-date=4 July 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/Structure-and-governance/Mireille-Ballestrazzi|title=Interpol: Mireille Ballestrazzi|publisher=Interpol|access-date=29 November 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161130111244/https://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/Structure-and-governance/Mireille-Ballestrazzi|archive-date=30 November 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
| {{flagicon|Sweden}} ] || to 1996</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|Japan}} ] || to 2000</tr> | |||
==== Meng Hongwei (2016–2018) ==== | |||
| {{flagicon|Spain}} ] || to 2004</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|South Africa}} ] || to 2008</tr> | |||
In November 2016, ], a politician from the ], was elected president during the 85th Interpol General Assembly, and was to serve in this capacity until 2020.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/Structure-and-governance/President|title=Interpol: President|publisher=Interpol|access-date=29 November 2016|archive-date=26 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126002720/https://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/Structure-and-governance/President|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
| {{flagicon|Chile}} ] || acting president until the General Assembly in Sankt Petersburg in October 2008, and candidate for the President on that General Assembly</tr> | |||
| {{flagicon|Singapore}} ] || since Oct 2008</tr> | |||
At the end of September 2018, Meng was reported missing during a trip to China, after being “taken away” for questioning by discipline authorities.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/2167213/french-police-launch-hunt-missing-chinese-head-interpol-meng|title=Missing Interpol president Meng Hongwei 'under investigation' in China|date=5 October 2018|work=South China Morning Post|access-date=10 October 2020|archive-date=19 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181119164516/https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/2167213/french-police-launch-hunt-missing-chinese-head-interpol-meng|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-45771813|title=Interpol plea on missing president|date=6 October 2018|work=BBC News|access-date=6 October 2018|archive-date=8 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181008074329/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-45771813|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/interpol-chief-missing-france-police-meng-hongwei-where-president-lyon-latest-a8569876.html|title=French police launch investigation after Interpol chief goes missing for a week in China|work=The Independent|access-date=6 October 2018|archive-date=5 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181005201913/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/interpol-chief-missing-france-police-meng-hongwei-where-president-lyon-latest-a8569876.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Chinese police later confirmed that Meng had been arrested on charges of bribery as part of a national anti-corruption campaign.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-45777681|title=Detained Interpol chief 'took bribes'|date=8 October 2018|work=BBC News|access-date=26 November 2018|archive-date=22 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181122155553/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-45777681|url-status=live}}</ref> On October 7, 2018, INTERPOL announced that Meng had resigned his post with immediate effect and that the Presidency would be temporarily occupied by Interpol Senior Vice-president (Asia) ] of South Korea. | |||
|} | |||
==== Kim Jong Yang (2018–2021) ==== | |||
On November 21, 2018, Interpol’s General Assembly elected ] to fill the remainder of Meng’s term,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2018/N2018-139|title=N2018-139 / 2018 / News / News and media / Internet / Home – INTERPOL|website=interpol.int|access-date=26 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181121105513/https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2018/N2018-139|archive-date=21 November 2018|url-status=dead}}</ref> in a controversial election which saw accusations that the other candidate, Vice President ] of Russia, had used Interpol notices to target critics of the Russian government.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46286959|title=Russia loses Interpol presidency vote|date=21 November 2018|work=BBC News|access-date=26 November 2018|archive-date=26 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181126111706/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46286959|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Four American senators had accused Vice President ] of abusing Red Notices, likening his election to "putting a fox in charge of the henhouse".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46274261|title=Likely next Interpol chief Prokopchuk 'fox in the henhouse', US senators say|publisher=BBC|date=20 November 2018|access-date=20 November 2018|archive-date=20 November 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181120232628/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46274261|url-status=live}}</ref> A statement posted by the ] and signed by other NGOs raised concerns about his ability to use his Interpol position to silence Russia's critics.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/546163.html|title=NGO, human rights groups from different countries oppose election of Russia's representative as president of INTERPOL|agency=Interfax|date=19 November 2018|access-date=20 November 2018|archive-date=19 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919203341/https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/546163.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Russian politicians criticized the U.S. accusation as politically motivated interference.<ref>{{cite web |title=Russia Denounces "Interference" At Interpol Leadership Vote |url=https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/russia-denounces-interference-at-interpol-leadership-vote-1950522 |access-date=21 November 2018 |archive-date=19 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919203341/https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/russia-denounces-interference-at-interpol-leadership-vote-1950522 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==== Ahmed Nase Al-Raisi (2021 – ) ==== | |||
On November 25, 2021, ], inspector general of the ]’s interior ministry, was elected as president. The election was controversial due to the UAE’s human rights record, with concerns being raised by some human rights groups (e.g. ]) and some MEPs. | |||
In June 2021, 35 French Parliamentarians, Members of Parliament and Senators, including from the majority and the opposition, urged President ] to oppose the candidacy of the UAE's General ], citing the accusations of torture against him. It was the second appeal by the deputy of the Rhône, ], who had first written to Macron earlier in 2021. He questioned how a profile like Al-Raisi's, who was responsible for the torture of political opponent ] and of a British academic ], can become the president of a most respectable institution.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.marianne.net/monde/proche-orient/la-france-ne-doit-pas-accepter-un-tortionnaire-a-la-tete-dinterpol|title=France must not accept a torturer at the head of Interpol|accessdate=18 June 2021|website=Marianne|date=18 June 2021|archive-date=18 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210618051812/https://www.marianne.net/monde/proche-orient/la-france-ne-doit-pas-accepter-un-tortionnaire-a-la-tete-dinterpol|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="auto">{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/10/01/exclusiveuae-police-chief-accused-presiding-torture-british/|title=Exclusive: UAE police chief accused of presiding over torture of British academic running to be head of Interpol|accessdate=1 October 2020|website=]|date=October 2020|last1=Johnson|first1=Jamie|archive-date=1 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201001161947/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/10/01/exclusiveuae-police-chief-accused-presiding-torture-british/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
While the UAE was arranging trips for Al-Raisi to Interpol's member countries, opposition against the Emirati candidate amplified. A number of ] MPs signed a petition to express "deep concern" and reject the candidacy of Al-Raisi for the post of Interpol director.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://icfuae.org.uk/news/german-mps-sign-petition-against-uae-candidate-interpol|title=German MPs Sign Petition Against UAE candidate for Interpol|accessdate=15 November 2021|website=ICFUAE|date=15 November 2021|archive-date=15 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211115091709/http://icfuae.org.uk/news/german-mps-sign-petition-against-uae-candidate-interpol|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://emiratesleaks.com/interpol-7/?lang=en|title=Germany MPs Reject UAE Candidate For INTERPOL Head|accessdate=14 November 2021|website=Emirates Leaks|date=14 November 2021|archive-date=8 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220408160753/https://emiratesleaks.com/interpol-7/?lang=en|url-status=live}}</ref> Rodney Dixon, the British lawyer of Matthew Hedges and Ali Ahmad, submitted a complaint and urged the Swedish authorities to arrest Al-Raisi upon his arrival in ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/wOxjQ1/toppkandidat-till-interpol-anklagad-for-tortyr--anmals-i-sverige|title=Top candidate for Interpol accused of torture – reported in Sweden|accessdate=4 November 2021|website=Aftonbladet|date=4 November 2021 |archive-date=23 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211123191135/https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/wOxjQ1/toppkandidat-till-interpol-anklagad-for-tortyr--anmals-i-sverige|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://twitter.com/Mhedgesh/status/1456306723279544320|title=Matthew Hedges: Tweet on complaint filed against al-Raisi in Sweden|accessdate=4 November 2021|website=Twitter|archive-date=4 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211104184751/https://twitter.com/Mhedgesh/status/1456306723279544320|url-status=live}}</ref> The two Britons also raised a similar request to arrest al-Raisi with the Norwegian police authorities. Both Sweden and ] apply jurisdiction that allows them to open investigations of crime, irrespective of a person's nationality or the origin country of the crime.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nouvelles-du-monde.com/ils-ont-ete-arretes-et-tortures-lhomme-quils-croient-responsable-pourrait-etre-le-prochain-president-dinterpol/|title=They were arrested and tortured. The man they believe is responsible could be Interpol's next president.|accessdate=13 November 2021|website=Nouvelles du monde|date=13 November 2021|archive-date=15 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211115122107/https://www.nouvelles-du-monde.com/ils-ont-ete-arretes-et-tortures-lhomme-quils-croient-responsable-pourrait-etre-le-prochain-president-dinterpol/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In October 2021, Al-Raisi had to face further opposition, as the lawyers submitted a complaint to the French Prosecutor in Paris. The claims cited Al-Raisi's role in the unlawful detention and torture of Ali Issa Ahmad and Matthew Hedges. Filed under the principle of universal jurisdiction, the complaint gave French officials the authority to investigate and arrest foreign nationals. As Raisi is not a head of state, French authorities had all the rights to arrest and question him on entering the French territory.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/dominicdudley/2021/10/01/torture-complaint-filed-against-uae-candidate-for-interpol-chief/?sh=4a24b9b53345|title=Torture Complaint Filed Against U.A.E. Candidate For Interpol Chief|accessdate=1 October 2021|website=Forbes|archive-date=5 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211005131619/https://www.forbes.com/sites/dominicdudley/2021/10/01/torture-complaint-filed-against-uae-candidate-for-interpol-chief/?sh=4a24b9b53345|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
As the General Assembly was approaching, the opposition was rising. In November 2021, a Turkish lawyer Gulden Sonmez filed a criminal complaint against Al-Raisi's nomination in Turkey, where the vote was to take place. Sonmez said the Emirates' attempt to cover its human rights records and to launder its reputation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20211109-calls-for-turkey-to-arrest-uae-candidate-for-interpol-chief/|title=Calls for Turkey to arrest UAE candidate for Interpol chief|accessdate=9 November 2021|website=Middle East Monitor|date=9 November 2021|archive-date=2 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200102225119/https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20211109-calls-for-turkey-to-arrest-uae-candidate-for-interpol-chief/|url-status=live}}</ref> Besides, Hedges and Ahmad were also expected to file a lawsuit in Turkey against Al-Raisi, ahead of the General Assembly.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/20/uae-nominee-interpol-ahmed-naser-al-raisi-torture-claims|title='He is responsible for torture': nominee for Interpol chief accused by detained Britons|accessdate=20 November 2021|website=The Guardian|date=20 November 2021|archive-date=27 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211127163415/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/20/uae-nominee-interpol-ahmed-naser-al-raisi-torture-claims|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
== Criticism == | |||
] pleaded guilty for accepting bribes over 14.5 million yuan.<ref name=Asahi20062019>{{cite news |url=http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201906200048.html |title=Former Interpol chief admits guilt in Chinese court hearing |work=] |agency=] |date=20 June 2019 |access-date=9 March 2020 |archive-date=12 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112030012/http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201906200048.html |url-status=live }}</ref>]] | |||
=== Abusive requests for Interpol arrests === | |||
{{See also|Police misconduct|Transnational repression|Lawfare}} | |||
Despite its politically neutral stance, some have criticized the agency for its role in arrests that critics contend were politically motivated.<ref name="2019-03-22-nyt">{{cite news | title=How Strongmen Turned Interpol into Their Personal Weapon | author=Matt Apuzzo | newspaper=The New York Times | date=22 March 2019 | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/22/world/europe/interpol-most-wanted-red-notices.html | access-date=23 March 2019 | archive-date=2 January 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200102225119/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/22/world/europe/interpol-most-wanted-red-notices.html | url-status=live }}</ref> In their declaration, adopted in Oslo (2010),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.oscepa.org/meetings/annual-sessions/2010-oslo|title=2010 Oslo Annual Session|work=oscepa.org|access-date=3 September 2015|archive-date=7 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150907173924/http://www.oscepa.org/meetings/annual-sessions/2010-oslo|url-status=dead}}</ref> Monaco (2012),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.oscepa.org/publications/declarations/2012-monaco-declaration|title=Se confirma victoria europeísta en elecciones ucranianas avaladas por la OSCE|trans-title=Europeanist victory confirmed in Ukrainian elections endorsed by the OSCE|language=es|publisher=OSCE PA|date=27 October 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919203341/https://www.oscepa.org/publications/declarations/2012-monaco-declaration|archive-date=19 September 2015}}</ref> Istanbul (2013),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.oscepa.org/publications/declarations/2013-istanbul-declaration|title=Kiew hat ein neues Parlament, aber keine Aufbruchstimmung|trans-title=Kyiv has a new parliament, but no lift in mood|language=de|publisher=OSCE PA|date=27 October 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919083027/https://www.oscepa.org/publications/declarations/2013-istanbul-declaration|archive-date=19 September 2015}}</ref> and Baku (2014),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.oscepa.org/meetings/annual-sessions/2014-baku-annual-session|title=2014 Baku Annual Session|work=oscepa.org|access-date=3 September 2015|archive-date=6 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150906032208/http://www.oscepa.org/meetings/annual-sessions/2014-baku-annual-session|url-status=dead}}</ref> the ] (PACE) criticized some OSCE member States for their abuse of mechanisms of the international investigation and urged them to support the reform of Interpol in order to avoid politically motivated ]. The resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 31 January 2014 criticizes the mechanisms of operation of the Commission for the Control of Interpol's files, in particular, non-adversarial procedures and unjust decisions.<ref>{{cite web|first=José María|last=Beneyto|url=https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/X2H-Xref-ViewPDF.asp?FileID=20310&Lang=EN|title=Doc. 13370: Accountability of international organizations for human rights violations|publisher=Council of Europe|date=17 December 2013|access-date=31 March 2017|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304203812/http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/X2H-Xref-ViewPDF.asp?FileID=20310&Lang=EN|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/Votes/DB-VotesResults-EN.asp?VoteID=34872&DocID=14925&MemberID=6906|title=Vote on Resolution: Assembly's voting results: Vote of José María BENEYTO (EPP/CD)|publisher=assembly.coe.int|year=2014|access-date=31 March 2017|archive-date=25 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170325234552/http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/Votes/DB-VotesResults-EN.asp?VoteID=34872&DocID=14925&MemberID=6906|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2014, PACE adopted a decision to thoroughly analyse the problem of the abuse of Interpol and to compile a special report on this matter.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-DocDetails-EN.asp?fileid=21096&lang=EN|title=Parliamentary Assembly|work=coe.int|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=17 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200817181800/http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-DocDetails-EN.asp?FileID=21096&lang=EN|url-status=live}}</ref> In May 2015, within the framework of the preparation of the report, the PACE Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights organized a hearing in ], during which both representatives of NGOs and Interpol had the opportunity to speak.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.assembly.coe.int/Committee/JUR/2015/JUR004E.pdf |title=Synopsis of the meeting held in Yerevan, Armenia on 19–20 May 2015 |publisher=Council of Europe |date=26 May 2015 |access-date=24 February 2016 |archive-date=4 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304125226/http://www.assembly.coe.int/Committee/JUR/2015/JUR004E.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> According to ], Russia is responsible for 38% of Interpol's public Red Notices.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211021125303/https://freedomhouse.org/report/transnational-repression/russia |date=21 October 2021 }} Freedomhouse, 2021</ref> There currently are "approximately 66,370 valid Red Notices, of which some 7,669 are public."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211125022748/https://www.interpol.int/How-we-work/Notices/Red-Notices |date=25 November 2021 }} Interpol. 2021.</ref> | |||
Refugees who are included in the list of Interpol can be arrested when crossing the border.<ref name="fairtrials.org" /> In the year 2008, the office of the ] pointed to the problem of arrests of refugees on the request of INTERPOL<ref>{{cite web|title="Terrorism as a Global Phenomenon", UNHCR presentation to the Joint Seminar of the Strategic Committee on Immigration, Frontiers and Asylum (SCIFA) and Committee on Article 36 (CATS)|url=https://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home/opendocPDF.pdf?docid=478e03702|author=United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees|date=18 January 2008|publisher=UNHCR|access-date=24 February 2016|archive-date=19 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919203341/https://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home/opendocPDF.pdf?docid=478e03702|url-status=live}}</ref> in connection with politically motivated charges. | |||
In 2021, Turkey,<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-04-11 |title=Weaponizing the Police: Authoritarian Abuse of Interpol |url=https://hir.harvard.edu/weaponizing-the-police-authoritarian-abuse-of-interpol/ |access-date=2022-09-07 |website=Harvard International Review |archive-date=7 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220907061145/https://hir.harvard.edu/weaponizing-the-police-authoritarian-abuse-of-interpol/ |url-status=live }}</ref> China, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela were accused of abusing Interpol by using it to target political opponents.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/oct/17/has-interpol-become-the-long-arm-of-oppressive-regimes|title=Has Interpol become the long arm of oppressive regimes?|last=Jacobs|first=Josh|date=17 October 2021|work=The Guardian|access-date=21 October 2021|archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128231432/https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/oct/17/has-interpol-become-the-long-arm-of-oppressive-regimes|url-status=live}}</ref> China used Interpol against the ], where the government issued a Red Notice against activists and other members of the ethnic minority group living abroad.<ref name=Hill-01-08-2021>{{cite web|url=https://thehill.com/opinion/international/565482-as-china-targets-uyghurs-worldwide-democracies-must-prevent-interpol|title=As China targets Uyghurs worldwide, democracies must prevent Interpol abuse|access-date=1 August 2021|website=The Hill|date=August 2021|archive-date=2 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200102225119/https://thehill.com/opinion/international/565482-as-china-targets-uyghurs-worldwide-democracies-must-prevent-interpol|url-status=live}}</ref> Since 1997, 1,546 cases from 28 countries of detention and deportation of the Uyghurs were recorded.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://oxussociety.org/viz/transnational-repression/|title=Incidents of Transnational Repression|accessdate=28 June 2021|website=The Oxus Society for Central Asian Affairs|archive-date=2 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200102225119/https://oxussociety.org/viz/transnational-repression/|url-status=live}}</ref> In the case of Turkey, Interpol had to turn down 800 requests,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Willsher |first=Kim |date=2021-11-25 |title=Turkey accused of using Interpol summit to crack down on critics |url=https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/nov/25/turkey-accused-of-using-interpol-summit-to-crack-down-on-critics |access-date=2022-09-07 |website=] |language=en |archive-date=26 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220826161326/https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/nov/25/turkey-accused-of-using-interpol-summit-to-crack-down-on-critics |url-status=live }}</ref> including one for ] basketball player ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Meacham |first=Sam |date=2022-04-11 |title=Weaponizing the Police: Authoritarian Abuse of Interpol |url=https://hir.harvard.edu/weaponizing-the-police-authoritarian-abuse-of-interpol/ |access-date=2022-09-07 |website=] |archive-date=7 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220907061145/https://hir.harvard.edu/weaponizing-the-police-authoritarian-abuse-of-interpol/ |url-status=live }}</ref> The UAE was also accused as one of the countries attempting to buy influence in Interpol. Using the Interpol Foundation for a Safer World, the Arab nation gave donations of $54 million. The amount was estimated as equal to the statutory contributions together made by the rest 194 members.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2017/UAE-pledges-EUR-50-million-to-support-seven-key-INTERPOL-projects|title=UAE pledges EUR 50 million to support seven key INTERPOL projects|accessdate=27 March 2017|website=Interpol|archive-date=2 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200102225119/https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2017/UAE-pledges-EUR-50-million-to-support-seven-key-INTERPOL-projects|url-status=live}}</ref> It was asserted that the Emirates' growing influence over Interpol gave it the opportunity to host the General Assembly in 2018 and in 2020 (that was postponed due to the ]).<ref name=Hill-01-08-2021 /> | |||
==== World ==== | |||
Organizations such as ], ],<ref name="en.odfoundation.eu">{{cite web|url=https://en.odfoundation.eu/a/5947,the-report-the-interpol-system-is-in-need-of-reform|title=The report: The Interpol system is in need of reform|date=24 February 2015|publisher=The Open Dialog Foundation|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=30 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210430180532/https://en.odfoundation.eu/a/5947,the-report-the-interpol-system-is-in-need-of-reform/|url-status=live}}</ref> ],<ref name="fairtrials.org">{{cite web|url=https://www.fairtrials.org/publications/policy-report-interpol-and-human-rights/|title=Policy report: INTERPOL and human rights|work=FairTrials.org|date=26 November 2013|access-date=12 March 2016|archive-date=14 November 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151114235115/http://www.fairtrials.org/publications/policy-report-interpol-and-human-rights/|url-status=live}}</ref> ],<ref name="cms.hr">{{cite web|url=https://www.cms.hr/en/azil-i-integracijske-politike/slucaj-poput-ozerdem-nece-se-ponoviti-i-cms-zasluzan-za-izmjenu-interpolovih-pravila|title=Safeguarding nonrefoulement within Interpol's mechanisms|work=Safeguarding non-refoulement within Interpol's mechanisms – CMS|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=29 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210429094509/https://www.cms.hr/en/azil-i-integracijske-politike/slucaj-poput-ozerdem-nece-se-ponoviti-i-cms-zasluzan-za-izmjenu-interpolovih-pravila|url-status=live}}</ref> and ],<ref name="icij.org">{{cite web|url=https://www.icij.org/project/interpols-red-flag/interpols-red-notices-used-some-pursue-political-dissenters-opponents|title=Interpol's Red Notices used by some to pursue political dissenters, opponents|work=International Consortium of Investigative Journalists|date=16 March 2012|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=6 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706032535/https://www.icij.org/project/interpols-red-flag/interpols-red-notices-used-some-pursue-political-dissenters-opponents|url-status=live}}</ref> indicate that non-democratic states use Interpol to harass opposition politicians, journalists, human rights activists, and businessmen. The countries accused of abusing the agency include China, Russia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Iran, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Venezuela, and Tunisia.<ref name="en.odfoundation.eu" /><ref name="fairtrials.org" /><ref name="icij.org" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/04/21/interpol-is-helping-enforce-chinas-political-purges/|title=Interpol Is Helping Enforce China's Political Purges|first=Bethany|last=Allen-Ebrahimian|date=21 April 2017 |access-date=1 September 2017|archive-date=27 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170827090322/http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/04/21/interpol-is-helping-enforce-chinas-political-purges/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The ]'s report analysed 44 high-profile political cases which went through the Interpol system.<ref name="en.odfoundation.eu" /> A number of persons who have been granted refugee status in the ] (EU) and the US—including Russian businessman ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2012-321554|title=INTERPOL|work=interpol.int|access-date=3 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924052328/https://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2012-321554|archive-date=24 September 2015|url-status=dead}}</ref> Chechen Arbi Bugaev,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2005-29768|title=INTERPOL|work=interpol.int|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=24 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924052245/http://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2005-29768|url-status=dead}}</ref> Kazakh opposition politician ]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2011-55578|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924052314/http://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2011-55578|url-status=dead|archive-date=24 September 2015|title=INTERPOL|work=interpol.int}}</ref> and his associate Artur Trofimov,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2012-348085|title=INTERPOL|work=interpol.int|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=24 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924052330/http://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2012-348085|url-status=dead}}</ref> and Sri Lankan journalist Chandima Withana<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2010-23448|title=INTERPOL|work=interpol.int|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=24 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924052308/http://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2010-23448|url-status=dead}}</ref> —continue to remain on the public INTERPOL list. Some of the refugees remain on the list even after courts have refused to extradite them to a non-democratic state (for example, Pavel Zabelin,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2007-33972|title=INTERPOL|work=interpol.int|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=24 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924052258/http://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2007-33972|url-status=dead}}</ref> a witness in the case of ], and Alexandr Pavlov,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2012-296554|title=INTERPOL|work=interpol.int|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=24 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924052322/http://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2012-296554|url-status=dead}}</ref> former security chief of the Kazakh oppositionist ]). Another case is ], a politician who opposed ] and fled to ] in 2009 and was subject to a red alert on charges of corruption for two weeks. Interpol deleted the request for prosecution immediately.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna30376527|title=Venezuela: Interpol seeks arrest of Chavez foe|website=]|date=24 April 2009 |access-date=16 June 2021|archive-date=24 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210624195621/https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna30376527|url-status=live}}</ref> Interpol has also been criticized for mistaking people on yellow alerts. One case was Alondra Díaz-Nuñez, who in April 2015 was apprehended in ], Mexico being mistaken for a missing American teenager.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-32770139|title= Alondra Díaz-Nuñez case |website=] |date=12 December 2024 |access-date=12 December 2024 }}</ref> Interpol came under heavy criticism from Mexican news and media for helping out ], ], and the U.S. Embassy and Consulate in Mexico, in what was believed to be a ]. | |||
==== Eastern Europe ==== | |||
The 2013 PACE's Istanbul Declaration of the OSCE cited specific cases of such prosecution, including those of the Russian activist Petr Silaev, financier ], businessman Ilya Katsnelson, Belarusian politician ], and Ukrainian politician ].{{Citation needed|date=May 2020}} | |||
On 25 July 2014, despite Interpol's Constitution prohibiting them from undertaking any intervention or activities of a political or military nature,<ref>{{cite web|title=Neutrality (Article 3 of the Constitution)|url=https://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/Legal-materials/Neutrality-Article-3-of-the-Constitution|year=1956|work=INTERPOL.int|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150316234943/https://www.interpol.int/About-INTERPOL/Legal-materials/Neutrality-Article-3-of-the-Constitution|archive-date=16 March 2015|access-date=12 March 2016}}</ref> the Ukrainian nationalist paramilitary leader ] was placed on Interpol's international wanted list at the request of Russian authorities,<ref>{{cite news|author=Mark Rachkevych|date=25 July 2014|title=Interpol issues wanted notice for nationalist leader Yarosh at Russia's behest|work=Kyiv Post|url=https://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/interpol-issues-wanted-notice-for-nationalist-leader-yarosh-at-russias-behest-357964.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140725222826/https://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/interpol-issues-wanted-notice-for-nationalist-leader-yarosh-at-russias-behest-357964.html|archive-date=25 July 2014}}</ref> which made him the only person wanted internationally after the beginning of the ]. For a long time, Interpol refused to place former ] ] on the wanted list as a suspect by the new ] for the mass killing of protesters during ].<ref>{{cite news|date=8 December 2014|script-title=uk:Інтерпол відмовився оголосити у розшук Януковича і К°|language=uk|trans-title=Interpol has declined putting Yanukovych and Co on wanted list|agency=]|url=https://www.ukrinform.ua/ukr/news/interpol_vidmovivsya_ogolositi_u_rozshuk_yanukovicha_i_k_1999551|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150810043657/https://www.ukrinform.ua/ukr/news/interpol_vidmovivsya_ogolositi_u_rozshuk_yanukovicha_i_k_1999551|archive-date=10 August 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=17 November 2014|script-title=uk:МВС розслідує політичні мотиви Інтерполу у справах Януковича і Ко|language=uk|trans-title=Ministry of Internal Affairs is investigating Interpol's political motives regarding Yanukovych and Co|agency=]|url=https://www.ukrinform.ua/ukr/news/mvs_rozslidue__politichni_motivi_interpolu_u_spravah_yanukovicha_i_ko_1992338|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150703180837/https://www.ukrinform.ua/ukr/news/mvs_rozslidue__politichni_motivi_interpolu_u_spravah_yanukovicha_i_ko_1992338|archive-date=3 July 2015}}</ref> Yanukovych was eventually placed on the wanted list on 12 January 2015.<ref>{{cite web|title=YANUKOVYCH, VIKTOR: Wanted by the judicial authorities of Ukraine for prosecution / to serve a sentence|url=https://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2014-13031|year=2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20150112165034/http://www.interpol.int/notice/search/wanted/2014-13031|archive-date=12 January 2015|access-date=12 January 2015}}</ref> However, on 16 July 2015, after an intervention of Joseph Hage Aaronson, the British law firm hired by Yanukovych, the international arrest warrant against the former president of Ukraine was suspended pending further review.<ref>{{cite web|title=Ex-Ukrainian president Yanukovych no longer on Interpol wanted list|url=https://uatoday.tv/politics/ex-ukrainian-president-yanukovych-no-longer-on-interpol-wanted-person-list-459826.html|work=uatoday.tv|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150722110637/https://uatoday.tv/politics/ex-ukrainian-president-yanukovych-no-longer-on-interpol-wanted-person-list-459826.html|archive-date=22 July 2015}}</ref> In December 2014, the ] (SBU) liquidated{{clarify|date=October 2018}} a sabotage and reconnaissance group that was led by a former agent of the Ukrainian Bureau of INTERPOL that also has family relations in the Ukrainian counter-intelligence agencies.<ref>{{cite news|date=19 December 2014|script-title=uk:Групою бойовиків керував колишній працівник Інтерполу – СБУ|language=uk|trans-title=Group of militants was run by a former employee of Interpol – SBU|work=]|url=https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/12/19/7052604/|access-date=12 March 2016|archive-date=13 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160313115353/http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/12/19/7052604/|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2014, Russia made attempts to place Ukrainian politician ] and Ukrainian civic activist ], subject to criminal persecution in Russia following his pro-Ukrainian art performance in Moscow, on the Interpol wanted list.<ref>{{cite web|title=Russia continues to abuse the mechanisms of international criminal prosecution|url=https://en.odfoundation.eu/a/4784,russia-continues-to-abuse-the-mechanisms-of-international-criminal-prosecution|author=Andriy Osavoliyk|date=17 September 2014|publisher=The Open Dialog Foundation|access-date=12 March 2016|archive-date=14 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314053821/http://en.odfoundation.eu/a/4784,russia-continues-to-abuse-the-mechanisms-of-international-criminal-prosecution|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
On October 30, 2023, Belarusian filmmaker ] got arrested when he landed in ] as he was put on an Interpol warrant list. He is accused by the Belarusian authorities of tax evasion and issued an extradition request.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://balkaninsight.com/2024/03/01/lawyer-of-belarus-activist-trapped-in-serbia-indictment-is-pure-politics/|title=Lawyer of Belarus Activist Trapped in Serbia: Indictment is Pure Politics|work=] |date=1 March 2024}}</ref> During the ], Gnyot co-founded the Free Association of Athletes (SOS-BY), bringing together athletes opposed to the Lukashenko regime. He spent seven months in detention in Belgrade before being transferred to house arrest in June 2024. ] called on the Serbian authorities to cease the extradition process.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/06/serbia-activist-andrei-gnyot-must-not-be-extradited-to-belarus/|title=Serbia: Activist Andrei Gnyot must not be extradited to Belarus|work=] |date=27 June 2024}}</ref> | |||
==== Middle East ==== | |||
According to a report by the ] that was issued in September 2017, Turkey has weaponized Interpol mechanisms to hunt down legitimate critics and opponents in violation of Interpol's own constitution. The report lists abuse cases where not only arrest warrants but also revocation of travel documents and passports were used by Turkey as ]. The harassment campaign targeted foreign companies as well.<ref>{{cite web|title=Abuse of the Interpol System by Turkey|url=https://stockholmcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Abuse-Of-The-Interpol-System-By-Turkey_September-20-2017.pdf|author=Stockholm Center for Freedom|date=September 2017|publisher=Stockholm Center for Freedom|access-date=5 October 2017|archive-date=5 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171005202710/https://stockholmcf.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Abuse-Of-The-Interpol-System-By-Turkey_September-20-2017.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Syrian-Kurd ] was briefly detained at Turkey's request on 25 February 2018 in ], the capital of the ],<ref>{{Cite news|title=A Shameful case|language=en-US|work=Yekta Uzunoglu|url=https://yektauzunoglu.com/en/2018/03/02/a-shameful-case/|access-date=2018-07-05|archive-date=29 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210429094526/https://yektauzunoglu.com/en/2018/03/02/a-shameful-case/|url-status=live}}</ref> but was released 2 days later, drawing angry protests from Turkey.<ref>{{cite web|title=Czechs release Syrian Kurdish leader, won't extradite to Turkey|url=https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/02/detained-turkish-pyd-leader-freed-prague.html|date=27 February 2018|work=Al Monitor|access-date=17 May 2020|archive-date=5 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180705233225/https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/02/detained-turkish-pyd-leader-freed-prague.html|url-status=live}}</ref> On 17 March 2018, the Czech authorities dismissed Turkey's request as lacking merit.{{citation needed|date=July 2022}} | |||
After a senior UAE government official, ] became the President, Interpol ignored an injunction by the ] (ECHR), and cooperated with Serbian authorities to extradite a Bahraini activist. Ahmed Jaafar Mohamed Ali was extradited to Bahrain in a charter aircraft of ], a private Emirati airline headed by an Abu Dhabi royal family member. Critics raised concerns that it was just first example of how "red lines will be crossed" under the presidency of Al-Raisi. Besides, a warning was raised that after its decision, Interpol will be complicit in any abuse that Ali will face.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/jan/25/serbia-extradites-bahraini-dissident-in-cooperation-with-interpol|title=Serbia extradites Bahraini dissident in cooperation with Interpol|accessdate=25 January 2022|website=The Guardian|date=25 January 2022|archive-date=2 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200102225119/https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2022/jan/25/serbia-extradites-bahraini-dissident-in-cooperation-with-interpol|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2021 it was reported that Ahmed Naser had also allegedly tortured a number of people in the UAE before.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-59417409 |title=UAE general accused of torture elected Interpol president |work=BBC News |date=25 November 2021 |access-date=22 March 2022 |archive-date=6 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220506135039/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-59417409 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==== Appeals and requests withdrawals ==== | |||
The procedure for filing an appeal with Interpol is a long and complex one. For example, the Venezuelan journalist ] and a colleague of Kazakh activist Ablyazov, and Tatiana Paraskevich, who were granted refugee status, sought to overturn the politically motivated request for as long as one and a half years, and six months, respectively.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/humanrights/2014/03/interpol-accused-undermining-justice-201432010467639126.html|title=Interpol accused of undermining justice|author=Ida Karlsson|publisher=Al Jazeera|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=1 January 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200101192837/https://www.aljazeera.com/humanrights/2014/03/interpol-accused-undermining-justice-201432010467639126.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.amnestyusa.org/sites/default/files/uaa29513.pdf |title=UA:295/13 Index:EUR 71/008/2013 – Urgent Action: Woman faces torture if extradited |publisher=Amnesty International |date=21 October 2013 |access-date=24 February 2016 |archive-date=15 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160315073143/http://www.amnestyusa.org/sites/default/files/uaa29513.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=WQ&reference=E-2015-009196&format=XML&language=EN|title=Written question – Impact of Interpol Red Notice on Schengen Information System- E-009196/2015|publisher=Europa (web portal)|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=25 March 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170325234914/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=WQ&reference=E-2015-009196&format=XML&language=EN|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Interpol has previously recognized some requests to include persons on the wanted list as politically motivated, e.g., Indonesian activist ], Georgian politician ],<ref>{{cite web|title=Интерпол и Литва сочли преследование Таргамадзе политическим|url=https://lenta.ru/news/2013/05/13/politik/|work=lenta.ru|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=13 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210613190527/https://lenta.ru/news/2013/05/13/politik/|url-status=live}}</ref> ex-president of Georgia ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://oda.odessa.gov.ua/oda-news/pres-sluzhba-odesko-oda-pro-rshennya-nterpola/|date=31 July 2015|work=odessa.gov.ua|language=uk|script-title=uk:Прес-служба Одеської ОДА про рішення Інтерполу|trans-title=Press service of the Odesa Regional State Administration on the Interpol decision|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160316135640/https://oda.odessa.gov.ua/oda-news/pres-sluzhba-odesko-oda-pro-rshennya-nterpola/|archive-date=16 March 2016|access-date=12 March 2016}}</ref> ex-mayor of ] and ] candidate ] and ex-president of Honduras ];<ref>{{cite web|title=PR065 / 2009 / News / News and media / Internet / Home|url=https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2009/PR065|work=interpol.int|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150910050016/https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2009/PR065|archive-date=10 September 2015|access-date=3 September 2015}}</ref> these persons have subsequently been removed. However, in most cases, Interpol removes a Red Notice against refugees only after an ] state closes a criminal case or declares ] (for example, the cases of Russian activists and political refugees Petr Silaev, Denis Solopov, and Aleksey Makarov, as well as the Turkish sociologist and feminist ]).<ref>{{cite web|title=INTERPOL reinstates alert against Russian refugee|url=https://www.fairtrials.org/press/interpol-reinstates-alert-against-russian-refugee/|work=FairTrials.org|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131211232640/https://www.fairtrials.org/press/interpol-reinstates-alert-against-russian-refugee/|archive-date=2013-12-11}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Грани.Ру: Фигуранты 'химкинского дела' Солопов и Силаев амнистированы – Амнистия|url=https://grani.ru/tags/amnesty/m.230529.html|work=grani.ru|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=18 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160318151937/http://grani.ru/tags/amnesty/m.230529.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=В ФРГ арестован беженец из России Алексей Макаров. – Русская планета|url=https://rusplt.ru/society/krasnaya-ugroza-7357.html|work=rusplt.ru|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=29 April 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210429094509/https://rusplt.ru/society/krasnaya-ugroza-7357.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Turkey: Sociologist Pınar Selek acquitted for the fourth time in 16 years|url=https://www.pen-international.org/newsitems/turkey-sociologist-pinar-selek-acquitted-for-the-fourth-time-in-16-years/|work=pen-international.org|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150907042847/https://www.pen-international.org/newsitems/turkey-sociologist-pinar-selek-acquitted-for-the-fourth-time-in-16-years/|archive-date=7 September 2015|access-date=3 September 2015}}</ref> | |||
=== Diplomacy === | |||
In 2016, ] criticized Interpol for turning down its application to join the General Assembly as an observer.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/national-news/2016/11/06/483130/Taiwan-excluded.htm|title=Taiwan excluded from Interpol meet|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=7 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210307103635/http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/national/national-news/2016/11/06/483130/taiwan-excluded.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> The United States supported Taiwan's participation, and the ] passed legislation directing the Secretary of State to develop a strategy to obtain observer status for Taiwan.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/2426|title=S.2426 – A bill to direct the Secretary of State to develop a strategy to obtain observer status for Taiwan in the International Criminal Police Organization, and for other purposes.|date=18 March 2016|access-date=6 November 2016|archive-date=19 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919203341/https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/2426|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The election of Meng Hongwei, a Chinese national, as president and ], a Russian, as vice president of Interpol for Europe drew criticism in anglophone media and raised fears of Interpol accepting politically motivated requests from China and Russia.<ref>{{cite news|author=Robbie Gramer|date=10 November 2016|title=China and Russia Take the Helm of Interpol|work=Foreign Policy|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/10/china-and-russia-take-the-helm-of-interpol/|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170214222539/https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/11/10/china-and-russia-take-the-helm-of-interpol/|archive-date=14 February 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=24 September 2017|title=China to push for greater cooperation on graft, terrorism at Interpol meeting|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-interpol/china-to-push-for-greater-cooperation-on-graft-terrorism-at-interpol-meeting-idUSKCN1BZ019|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171018225914/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-interpol/china-to-push-for-greater-cooperation-on-graft-terrorism-at-interpol-meeting-idUSKCN1BZ019|archive-date=18 October 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author=Jonathan Kaiman|date=10 November 2016|title=Chinese public security official named head of Interpol, raising concerns among human rights advocates|work=Los Angeles Times|url=https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-china-interpol-20161110-story.html|access-date=23 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170726043448/https://www.latimes.com/world/asia/la-fg-china-interpol-20161110-story.html|archive-date=26 July 2017}}</ref> | |||
=== Business === | |||
In 2013, Interpol was criticized over its multimillion-dollar deals with such private sector bodies as ], ], and the pharmaceutical industry. The criticism was mainly about the lack of transparency and potential conflicts of interest, such as ].{{clarify|date=October 2018}}<ref>{{cite web|title=The smoke and mirrors of the tobacco industry's funding of Interpol|url=https://www.mediapart.fr/en/journal/international/301013/smoke-and-mirrors-tobacco-industrys-funding-interpol|author1=Mathieu Martinière|author2=Robert Schmidt|date=30 October 2013|work=Mediapart|access-date=12 March 2016|archive-date=19 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150919203341/https://www.mediapart.fr/en/journal/international/301013/smoke-and-mirrors-tobacco-industrys-funding-interpol|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Industry-INTERPOL deal signals challenges to illicit trade protocol|url=https://www.fctc.org/fca-news/illicit-trade/976-industry-interpol-deal-signals-challenges-to-illicit-trade-protocol|author=Trina Tune|work=fctc.org|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=28 June 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170628230630/http://www.fctc.org/fca-news/illicit-trade/976-industry-interpol-deal-signals-challenges-to-illicit-trade-protocol|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Interpol: Wer hilft hier wem?|url=https://www.zeit.de/2013/42/internationale-polizeiorganization-interpol-pharmaindustrie/komplettansicht|author1=Robert Schmidt|author2=Mathieu Martiniere|date=21 October 2013|work=Die Zeit}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Tabakindustrie: Interpol, die Lobby und das Geld|url=https://www.zeit.de/2013/23/interpol-tabakindustrie/komplettansicht|author1=Robert Schmidt|author2=Mathieu Martiniere|date=7 June 2013|work=Die Zeit|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=16 August 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210816064912/https://www.zeit.de/2013/23/interpol-tabakindustrie/komplettansicht|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=The transnational tobacco companies' strategy to promote Codentify, their inadequate tracking and tracing standard|url=https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2013/03/11/tobaccocontrol-2012-050796.full.pdf|author1=Luk Joossens|author2=Anna B Gilmore|date=12 March 2013|work=BMJ|access-date=24 February 2016|archive-date=2 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160302224744/http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2013/03/11/tobaccocontrol-2012-050796.full.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Interpol : le lobby du tabac se paie une vitrine|url=https://www.lyoncapitale.fr/Journal/France-monde/Actualite/Dossiers/L-immoral-financement-d-Interpol/Interpol-le-lobby-du-tabac-se-paie-une-vitrine|author1=Robert Schmidt|author2=Mathieu Martiniere|work=lyoncapitale.fr|date=12 July 2013|access-date=29 April 2021|archive-date=22 February 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180222051117/http://www.lyoncapitale.fr/Journal/France-monde/Actualite/Dossiers/L-immoral-financement-d-Interpol/Interpol-le-lobby-du-tabac-se-paie-une-vitrine|url-status=live}}</ref> After the ], the organization has severed ties with all the private-sector bodies that evoked such criticism, and has adopted a new and transparent financing framework. | |||
== Reform == | |||
From 1 to 3 July 2015, Interpol organized a session of the Working Group on the Processing of Information, which was formed specifically in order to verify the mechanisms of information processing. The Working Group heard the recommendations of civil society as regards the reform of the international investigation system and promised to take them into account, in light of possible obstruction or refusal to file crime reports nationally.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2015/N2015-094|title=Working group starts review of Interpol's information processing mechanisms|work=interpol.int|date=3 July 2015|access-date=12 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160310140605/https://www.interpol.int/News-and-media/News/2015/N2015-094|archive-date=10 March 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
The Open Dialog Foundation, a human rights organization, recommended that Interpol, in particular: create a mechanism for the protection of rights of people having international refugee status; initiate closer cooperation of the Commission for the Control of Files with human rights NGOs and experts on asylum and extradition; enforce sanctions for violations of Interpol's rules; strengthen cooperation with NGOs, the UN, OSCE, the PACE, and the European Parliament.<ref>{{cite web|author=Lyudmyla Kozlovska|url=https://en.odfoundation.eu/a/6690,odf-drafted-recommendations-on-the-reform-of-interpol|title=ODF drafted recommendations on the reform of Interpol|publisher=The Open Dialog Foundation|date=14 July 2015|access-date=12 March 2016|archive-date=13 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160313131245/http://en.odfoundation.eu/a/6690,odf-drafted-recommendations-on-the-reform-of-interpol|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
] proposed to create effective remedies for individuals who are wanted under a Red Notice on unfair charges; to penalize nations which frequently abuse the Interpol system; to ensure more transparency of Interpol's work.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.fairtrials.org/press/fair-trials-make-recommendations-to-interpol-on-red-notice-abuse/|title=Fair Trials Makes Recommendations to Interpol on Red Notice Abuse|publisher=FairTrials.org|date=28 July 2015|access-date=12 March 2016|url-status=unfit|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924001432/https://www.fairtrials.org/press/fair-trials-make-recommendations-to-interpol-on-red-notice-abuse/|archive-date=24 September 2015}}</ref> | |||
The ] also created recommendations for Interpol, in particular, to delete Red Notices and Diffusions for people who were granted refugee status according to ] issued by their countries of origin, and to establish an independent body to review Red Notices on a regular basis.<ref name="cms.hr" /> | |||
== Emblem == | |||
] | |||
The current emblem of Interpol was adopted in 1950 and includes the following elements:<ref name="Name and logo" /> | |||
* the globe indicates worldwide activity | |||
* the olive branches represent peace | |||
* the sword represents police action | |||
* the scales signify justice | |||
* the acronyms "OIPC" and "ICPO", representing the full name of the organization in both French and English, respectively. | |||
== Membership == | |||
=== Members === | |||
Interpol currently has 196 member countries:<ref>{{Cite web|title=INTERPOL member countries|url=https://www.interpol.int/Who-we-are/Member-countries|access-date=2021-07-13|website=www.interpol.int|language=en|archive-date=22 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190222170452/https://www.interpol.int/Member-countries/World|url-status=live}}</ref><!-- Please help expand this by inserting the name of entity for the specific nation which officially represents that nation to the Interpol. e.g. CBI in India is the official liaison with Interpol.--> | |||
{{collapse top|title=Interpol members}} | |||
{{div col|colwidth=24em}} | |||
{{Unbulleted list | |||
|{{flag|Afghanistan|2013}} – October 2002<ref>{{cite web |title=Afghanistan |url=https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/Member-countries/Asia-South-Pacific/AFGHANISTAN |website=Interpol |access-date=24 July 2022 |archive-date=11 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220711162514/https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are/Member-countries/Asia-South-Pacific/AFGHANISTAN |url-status=live }}</ref>|{{flagicon|Albania}} ] – November 1991|{{flagicon|Algeria}} ] – August 1963|{{flagicon|Andorra}} ] – November 1987|{{flagicon|Angola}} ] – October 1982|{{flagicon|Antigua and Barbuda}} ] – October 1986|{{flagicon|Argentina}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Armenia}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Aruba}} ] – November 1987|{{flagicon|Australia}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Austria}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Azerbaijan}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Bahamas}} ] – October 1973|{{flagicon|Bahrain}} ] – September 1972|{{flagicon|Bangladesh}} ] – October 1976|{{flagicon|Barbados}} ] – November 1981|{{flagicon|Belarus}} ] – September 1993| {{flagicon|Belgium}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Belize}} ] – November 1987|{{flagicon|Benin}} ] – September 1962|{{flagicon|Bhutan}} ] – September 2005|{{flagicon|Bolivia}} ] – August 1963|{{flagicon|Bosnia and Herzegovina}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Botswana}} ] – November 1980| {{flagicon|Brazil}} ] – October 1986|{{flagicon|Brunei}} ] – September 1984|{{flagicon|Bulgaria}} ] – November 1989|{{flagicon|Burkina Faso}} ] – September 1961|{{flagicon|Burundi}} ] – October 1970|{{flagicon|Cambodia}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Cameroon}} ] – September 1961| {{flagicon|Canada}} ] – October 1949|{{flagicon|Cape Verde}} ] – November 1989|{{flagicon|Central African Republic}} ] – June 1965|{{flagicon|Chad}} ] – September 1962|{{flagicon|Chile}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|China}} ] – September 1961| {{flagicon|Colombia}} ] – June 1956| {{flagicon|Comoros}} ] – October 1998| {{flagicon|Republic of the Congo}} ] – September 1961| {{flagicon|Democratic Republic of the Congo}} ] – August 1963|{{flagicon|Costa Rica}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Côte d'Ivoire}} ] – September 1961|{{flagicon|Croatia}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Cuba}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Curaçao}} ] – October 2011|{{flagicon|Cyprus}} ] – September 1962|{{flagicon|Czech Republic}} ] – September 1993|{{flagicon|Denmark}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Djibouti}} ] – November 1980|{{flagicon|Dominica}} ] – November 1981|{{flagicon|Dominican Republic}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|East Timor}} ] – October 2002|{{flagicon|Ecuador}} ] – September 1962|{{flagicon|Egypt}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|El Salvador}} ] – December 1959|{{flagicon|Equatorial Guinea}} ] – November 1980|{{flagicon|Eritrea}} ] – November 1999|{{flagicon|Estonia}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Eswatini}} ] – October 1975|{{flagicon|Ethiopia}} ] – September 1958|{{flagicon|Fiji}} ] – September 1971| {{flagicon|Finland}} ] – June 1956| {{flagicon|France}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Gabon}} ] – September 1961|{{flagicon|Gambia}} ] – October 1986|{{flagicon|Georgia}} ] – September 1993| {{flagicon|Germany}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Ghana}} ] – September 1958|{{flagicon|Greece}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Grenada}} ] – October 1986|{{flagicon|Guatemala}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Guinea}} ] – September 1961|{{flagicon|Guinea-Bissau}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Guyana}} ] – October 1968|{{flagicon|Haiti}} ] – June 1957|{{flagicon|Honduras}} ] – September 1974|{{flagicon|Hungary}} ] – November 1981| {{flagicon|Iceland}} ] – September 1971|{{flagicon|India}} ] – October 1949|{{flagicon|Indonesia}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Iran}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Iraq}} ] – September 1967|{{flagicon|Ireland}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Israel}} ] – October 1949|{{flagicon|Italy}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Jamaica}} ] – August 1963|{{flagicon|Japan}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Jordan}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Kazakhstan}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Kenya}} ] – October 1968|{{flagicon|Kiribati}} ] – November 2018|{{flagicon|Kuwait}} ] – June 1965|{{flagicon|Kyrgyzstan}} ] – October 1996|{{flagicon|Laos}} ] – June 1957|{{flagicon|Latvia}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Lebanon}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Lesotho}} ] – September 1971|{{flagicon|Liberia}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Libya}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Liechtenstein}} ] – October 1960|{{flagicon|Lithuania}} ] – November 1991|{{flagicon|Luxembourg}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Madagascar}} ] – September 1961|{{flagicon|Malawi}} ] – August 1966|{{flagicon|Malaysia}} ] – September 1961|{{flagicon|Maldives}} ] – September 1984|{{flagicon|Mali}} ] – October 1969|{{flagicon|Malta}} ] – September 1972|{{flagicon|Marshall Islands}} ] – September 1990|{{flagicon|Mauritania}} ] – September 1962|{{flagicon|Mauritius}} ] – October 1969|{{flagicon|Mexico}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Moldova}} ] – September 1994|{{flagicon|Micronesia}} ] – November 2021|{{flagicon|Monaco}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Mongolia}} ] – November 1991|{{flagicon|Montenegro}} ] – September 2006|{{flagicon|Morocco}} ] – June 1957|{{flagicon|Mozambique}} ] – November 1989|{{flagicon|Myanmar}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Namibia}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Nauru}} ] – September 1971|{{flagicon|Nepal}} ] – September 1967|{{flagicon|Netherlands}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|New Zealand}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Nicaragua}} ] – June 1965|{{flagicon|Niger}} ] – September 1964|{{flagicon|Nigeria}} ] – October 1960|{{flagicon|North Macedonia}} ] – September 1993|{{flagicon|Norway}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Oman}} ] – September 1972|{{flagicon|Palau}} ] – November 2023|{{flagicon|Pakistan}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Palestine}} ] – September 2017|{{flagicon|Panama}} ] – September 1958|{{flagicon|Papua New Guinea}} ] – October 1976|{{flagicon|Paraguay}} ] – September 1977|{{flagicon|Peru}} ] – September 1962|{{flagicon|Philippines}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Poland}} ] – September 1990|{{flagicon|Portugal}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Qatar}} ] – September 1974|{{flagicon|Romania}} ] – October 1973|{{flagicon|Russia}} ] – September 1990|{{flagicon|Rwanda}} ] – September 1974|{{flagicon|Saint Kitts and Nevis}} ] – November 1987|{{flagicon|Saint Lucia}} ] – October 1983|{{flagicon|Saint Vincent and the Grenadines}} ] – October 1985|{{flagicon|Samoa}} ] – October 2009|{{flagicon|São Tomé and Príncipe}} ] – November 1988|{{flagicon|Saudi Arabia}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|San Marino}} ] – September 2006|{{flagicon|Senegal}} ] – September 1961|{{flagicon|Serbia}} ] – September 1956|{{flagicon|Seychelles}} ] – September 1977|{{flagicon|Sierra Leone}} ] – September 1962|{{flagicon|Singapore}} ] – October 1968|{{flagicon|Sint Maarten}} ] – October 2011|{{flagicon|Slovakia}} ] – September 1993|{{flagicon|Slovenia}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|Solomon Islands}} ] – September 2017|{{flagicon|Somalia}} ] – October 1975|{{flagicon|South Africa}} ] – September 1993|{{flagicon|South Korea}} ] – September 1964|{{flagicon|South Sudan}} ] – October 2011| {{flagicon|Spain}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Sri Lanka}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Sudan}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Suriname}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Sweden}} ] – June 1956| {{flagicon|Switzerland}} ] – June 1956|] ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Tajikistan}} ] – October 2004|{{flagicon|Tanzania}} ] – September 1962|{{flagicon|Thailand}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Togo}} ] – October 1960|{{flagicon|Tonga}} ] – September 1979|{{flagicon|Trinidad and Tobago}} ] – September 1964|{{flagicon|Tunisia}} ] – June 1957|{{flagicon|Turkey}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Turkmenistan}} ] – September 2005|{{flagicon|Uganda}} ] – August 1966|{{flagicon|Ukraine}} ] – November 1992|{{flagicon|United Arab Emirates}} ] – October 1973|{{flagicon|United Kingdom}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|United States}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Uruguay}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Uzbekistan}} ] – September 1994|{{flagicon|Vanuatu}} ] – November 2018|{{flagicon|Vatican City}} ] – October 2008|{{flagicon|Venezuela}} ] – June 1956|{{flagicon|Vietnam}} ] – November 1991|{{flagicon|Yemen}} ] – October 1976|{{flagicon|Zambia}} ] – August 1966|{{flagicon|Zimbabwe}} ] – November 1980| | |||
}} | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
{{collapse bottom}} | |||
==== Subnational-bureaus ==== | |||
{{div col|colwidth=16em}} | |||
{{Unbulleted list| {{flag|American Samoa}} | {{flag|Anguilla}} | {{flag|Bermuda}} | {{flag|British Virgin Islands}} | {{flag|Cayman Islands}} | {{flag|Gibraltar}} | {{flag|Hong Kong}} | {{flag|Montserrat}} | {{flag|Macau}} |{{flag|Puerto Rico}} | {{flag|Turks and Caicos Islands}} | | |||
{{flag|United Nations}} for {{flag|Kosovo}}<ref>https://www.unmikonline.org/Pages/rollo.aspx] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130801091646/https://www.unmikonline.org/Pages/rollo.aspx |date=1 August 2013 }} UNMIK.org</ref><ref>{{Cite press release |url=https://unmik.unmissions.org/unmik-press-statement-4-december-2017 |title=UNMIK Press Statement, 4 December 2017|date=4 December 2017 |publisher=UNMIK|access-date=6 June 2019|archive-date=6 June 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190606041842/https://unmik.unmissions.org/unmik-press-statement-4-december-2017|url-status=live}}</ref>}} | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
====Exclusions==== | |||
Two ] and three partially-recognized states are currently not members of Interpol: {{flagicon|North Korea}} ] and {{flagicon|Tuvalu}} ], as well as {{flagicon|Kosovo}} ], {{flagicon|Taiwan}} ], and {{flagicon|Western Sahara}} ]. | |||
The Republic of China (Taiwan) joined Interpol in September 1961. After the People's Republic of China was ] in the UN, Interpol transferred its recognition from the ROC to the PRC in September 1984.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.interpol.int/content/download/12634/file/INTERPOL%20Membership.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=26 March 2023 |archive-date=28 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230428154715/https://www.interpol.int/content/download/12634/file/INTERPOL%20Membership.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
In 2023, over 60 Interpol member states voiced their support for Taiwan's bid to re-join the organization. Specifically, representatives from Taiwan's diplomatic allies ], ], ], ], ], the ], and ] spoke up for Taiwan during the assembly.<ref>{{cite news|last=Liu|first=Tzu-hsuan|title=Sixty countries support Taiwan's Interpol bid|url=https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2023/12/06/2003810218|work=Taipei Times|date=6 December 2023|access-date=6 January 2024}}</ref> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{Portal|Law}} | |||
<!-- Please keep entries in alphabetical order & add a short description ] --> | |||
{{div col|colwidth=20em|small=yes}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ], a similar EU-wide organization. | * ], a similar EU-wide organization. | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
<!---♦♦♦ Please keep the list in alphabetical order ♦♦♦---> | |||
== Explanatory notes == | |||
{{Notelist}} | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{ |
{{Reflist}} | ||
== Further reading == | |||
* {{cite encyclopedia |last=Deflem |first=Mathieu |year=2016 |title=INTERPOL |editor-last=Jennings |editor-first=Wesley G. |encyclopedia=The Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment |location=Malden, MA |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell. |url=https://deflem.blogspot.com/2016/01/interpolencyclopedia.html }} | |||
* {{cite journal |last=Deflem |first=Mathieu |year=2024 |title=The Declining Significance of Interpol: Policing International Terrorism after 9/11 |journal=International Criminal Justice Review |volume=34 |pages=5–19 |doi=10.1177/10575677221136175 |s2cid=253433589 |url=https://deflem.blogspot.com/2022/11/interpol-terrorism.html }} | |||
* {{cite news | last=Khodorkovsky | first=Mikhail | title=In Putin's era it's crazy to let a Russian lead Interpol. We must prevent it | newspaper=The Guardian | date=20 November 2018 | url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/20/putin-russian-lead-interpol | access-date=8 March 2019}} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Martiniere |first1=Mathieu |last2=Schmidt |first2=Robert |title=Interpol: L'enquête: Révélations sur une police sous influence |date=11 October 2023 |language=fr |publisher=Harper Collins |isbn=979-1033914846 }} | |||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
* {{Commons category-inline}} | |||
* | |||
* {{official website}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
{{coord|45.78219|N|4.84838|E|region:FR_type:landmark|display=title}} | |||
{{Navboxes | |||
| title = Articles and topics related to Interpol | |||
| state = collapsed | |||
| list1 = | |||
{{International law enforcement organisations}} | {{International law enforcement organisations}} | ||
{{International organizations}} | |||
{{Supranationalism/World government topics|state=autocollapse}} | |||
{{6th arrondissement of Lyon}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{Coord|45.7822|N|4.8484|E|region:FR-ARA_type:landmark|display=title}} | |||
] | |||
<!--Categories--> | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
<!--Other languages--> | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 12:33, 27 December 2024
International police organization This article is about an international crime policing organization. For other uses, see Interpol (disambiguation).Law enforcement agency
International Criminal Police Organization | |
---|---|
Common name | Interpol |
Abbreviation | ICPO-INTERPOL |
Motto | Connecting police for a safer world |
Agency overview | |
Formed | 7 September 1923; 101 years ago (1923-09-07) |
Preceding agencies |
|
Employees | 1,050 (2019) |
Annual budget | €176 million (2023) |
Jurisdictional structure | |
International agency | |
Countries | 196 member states |
Governing body | General Assembly |
Constituting instrument |
|
Operational structure | |
Headquarters | Lyon, France |
Multinational agency | |
Nationalities of personnel | 130 (2024) |
Agency executives |
|
Facilities | |
National Central Bureaus | 196 |
Website | |
interpol | |
Languages (4) |
The International Criminal Police Organization – INTERPOL (abbreviated as ICPO–INTERPOL), commonly known as Interpol (UK: /ˈɪntərpɒl/ IN-tər-pol, US: /-poʊl/ -pohl; stylized in allcaps), is an international organization that facilitates worldwide police cooperation and crime control. It is the world's largest international police organization. It is headquartered in Lyon, France, with seven regional bureaus worldwide, and a National Central Bureau in all 196 member states.
The organization today known as Interpol was founded on 7 September 1923 at the close of a five-day International Police Congress in Vienna as the International Criminal Police Commission (ICPC); it adopted many of its current duties throughout the 1930s. After coming under Nazi control in 1938, the agency had its headquarters in the same building as the Gestapo. It was effectively stagnant until the end of World War II. In 1956, the ICPC adopted a new constitution and the name Interpol, derived from its telegraphic address used since 1946.
Interpol provides investigative support, expertise and training to law enforcement worldwide, focusing on three major areas of transnational crime: terrorism, cybercrime and organized crime. Its broad mandate covers virtually every kind of crime, including crimes against humanity, child pornography, drug trafficking and production, political corruption, intellectual property infringement, as well as white-collar crime. The agency also facilitates cooperation among national law enforcement institutions through criminal databases and communications networks. Contrary to popular belief, Interpol is itself not a law enforcement agency.
Interpol has an annual budget of €142 million ($155 million), most of which comes from annual contributions by member police forces in 181 countries. It is governed by a General Assembly composed of all member countries, which elects the executive committee and the President (currently Ahmed Naser Al-Raisi of the United Arab Emirates) to supervise and implement Interpol's policies and administration. Day-to-day operations are carried out by the General Secretariat, comprising around 1,000 personnel from over 100 countries, including both police and civilians. The Secretariat is led by the Secretary-General, currently Valdecy Urquiza, the former Vice President of Interpol for the Americas.
Pursuant to its charter, Interpol seeks to remain politically neutral in fulfilling its mandate, and is thus barred from interventions or activities that are political, military, religious, or racial in nature and from involving itself in disputes over such matters. The agency operates in four languages: Arabic, English, French and Spanish.
History
Until the 19th century, cooperation among police in different national and political jurisdictions was organized largely on an “ad hoc” basis, focused on a specific goal or criminal enterprise. The earliest attempt at a formal, permanent framework for international police coordination was the Police Union of German States, formed in 1851 to bring together police from various German-speaking states. Its activities were centered mostly on political dissidents and criminals. A similar plan was launched by Italy in the 1898 Anti-Anarchist Conference of Rome, which brought delegates from 21 European countries to create a formal structure for addressing the international anarchist movement. Neither the conference nor its follow up meeting in St. Petersburg in 1904 yielded results.
The early 20th century saw several more efforts to formalize international police cooperation, as growing international travel and commerce facilitated transnational criminal enterprises and fugitives of the law. The earliest was the International Criminal Police Congress hosted by Monaco in 1914, which brought diplomats and legal officials from two dozen countries to discuss international cooperation in investigating crimes, sharing investigative techniques, and extradition procedures. The Monaco Congress laid out twelve principles and priorities that would eventually become foundational to Interpol, including providing direct contact between police in different nations; creating an international standard for forensics and data collection; and facilitating the efficient processing of extradition requests. The idea of an international police organization remained dormant due to the First World War. The United States attempted to lead a similar effort in 1922 through the International Police Conference in New York City, but it failed to attract international attention.
A year later, in 1923, a new initiative was undertaken at another International Criminal Police Congress in Vienna, spearheaded by Johannes Schober, President of the Viennese Police Department. The 22 delegates agreed to found the International Criminal Police Commission (ICPC), the direct forerunner of Interpol, which would be based in Vienna. Founding members included police officials from Austria, Germany, Belgium, Poland, China, Egypt, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan, Romania, Sweden, Switzerland and Yugoslavia. The same year, wanted person notices were first published in the ICPCs International Public Safety Journal. The United Kingdom joined in 1928. The United States did not join Interpol until 1938, although a U.S. police officer unofficially attended the 1923 congress. By 1934, the ICPC’s membership more than doubled to 58 nations.
Following the Anschluss in 1938, the Vienna-based organization fell under the control of Nazi Germany; on November 29, 1941, Interpol had offices at Am Kleinen Wannsee 16; the commission’s headquarters were eventually moved to Berlin in 1942. Most member states withdrew their support during this period. From 1938 to 1945, the presidents of the ICPC included Otto Steinhäusl, Reinhard Heydrich, Arthur Nebe and Ernst Kaltenbrunner. All were generals in the Schutzstaffel (SS); Kaltenbrunner was the highest-ranking SS officer executed following the Nuremberg trials.
In 1946, after the end of World War II, the organization was revived as the International Criminal Police Organization (ICPO) by officials from Belgium, France, Scandinavia, the United States and the United Kingdom. Its new headquarters were established in Paris, then from 1967 in Saint-Cloud, a Parisian suburb. They remained there until 1989 when they were moved to their present location in Lyon.
Until the 1980s, Interpol did not intervene in the prosecution of Nazi war criminals in accordance with Article 3 of its Charter, which prohibited intervention in "political" matters.
On May 10, 2023, Operation Identify Me was launched.
Constitution
The role of Interpol is defined by the general provisions of its constitution.
Article 2 states that its role is:
- To ensure and promote the widest possible mutual assistance between all criminal police authorities within the limits of the laws existing in the different countries and in the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
- To establish and develop all institutions likely to contribute effectively to the prevention and suppression of ordinary law crimes.
Article 3 states:
It is strictly forbidden for the Organization to undertake any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious or racial character.
Methodology
Contrary to the common idea due to frequent portrayals in popular media, Interpol is not a supranational law enforcement agency and has no agents with arresting powers. Instead, it is an international organization that functions as a network of law enforcement agencies from different countries. The organization thus functions as an administrative liaison among the law enforcement agencies of the member countries, providing communications and database assistance, mostly through its central headquarters in Lyon, along with the assistance of smaller local bureaus in each of its member states.
Interpol's databases at the Lyon headquarters can assist law enforcement in fighting international crime. While national agencies have their own extensive crime databases, the information rarely extends beyond one nation's borders. Interpol's databases can track criminals and crime trends around the world, specifically by means of authorized collections of fingerprints and face photos, lists of wanted persons, DNA samples, and travel documents. Interpol's lost and stolen travel document database alone contains more than 12 million records. Officials at the headquarters also analyze this data and release information on crime trends to the member countries.
An encrypted Internet-based worldwide communications network allows Interpol agents and member countries to contact each other at any time. Known as I-24/7, the network offers constant access to Interpol's databases. While the National Central Bureaus are the primary access sites to the network, some member countries have expanded it to key areas such as airports and border access points. Member countries can also access each other's criminal databases via the I-24/7 system.
Interpol issues eight types of Interpol notices, seven of which are: red, blue, green, yellow, black, orange, and purple. An eighth special notice is issued at the special request of the United Nations Security Council. As of 2019, there are currently 62,448 valid Red and 12,234 Yellow notices in circulation.
In the event of an international disaster, terrorist attack, or assassination, Interpol can send an Incident Response Team (IRT). IRTs can offer a range of expertise and database access to assist with victim identification, suspect identification, and the dissemination of information to other nations' law enforcement agencies. In addition, at the request of local authorities, they can act as a central command and logistics operation to coordinate other law enforcement agencies involved in a case. Such teams were deployed eight times in 2013. Interpol began issuing its own travel documents in 2009 with hopes that nations would remove visa requirements for individuals travelling for Interpol business, thereby improving response times. In September 2017, the organization voted to accept Palestine and the Solomon Islands as members.
Finances
In 2019, Interpol's operating income was €142 million, of which 41 percent were statutory contributions by member countries, 35 percent were voluntary cash contributions and 24 percent were in-kind contributions for the use of equipment, services and buildings. With the goal of enhancing the collaboration between Interpol and the private sector to support Interpol's missions, the Interpol Foundation for a Safer World was created in 2013. Although legally independent of Interpol, the relationship between the two is close enough for Interpol's president to obtain in 2015 the departure of HSBC CEO from the foundation board after the Swiss Leaks allegations.
From 2004 to 2010, Interpol's external auditors was the French Court of Audit. In November 2010, the Court of Audit was replaced by the Office of the Auditor General of Norway for a three-year term with an option for a further three years.
Offices
In addition to its General Secretariat headquarters in Lyon, Interpol maintains six regional bureaus and three special representative offices:
- Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Brussels, Belgium (special representative office to the European Union)
- Yaoundé, Cameroon
- Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire
- San Salvador, El Salvador
- Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (special representative office to the African Union)
- Nairobi, Kenya
- New York City, United States (special representative office to the United Nations)
- Harare, Zimbabwe
Interpol's Command and Coordination Centres offer a 24-hour point of contact for national police forces seeking urgent information or facing a crisis. The original is in Lyon with a second in Buenos Aires added in September 2011. A third was opened in Singapore in September 2014.
Interpol opened a Special Representative Office to the UN in New York City in 2004 and to the EU in Brussels in 2009.
The organization has constructed the Interpol Global Complex for Innovation (IGCI) in Singapore to act as its research and development facility, and a place of cooperation on digital crimes investigations. It was officially opened in April 2015, but had already become active beforehand. Most notably, a worldwide takedown of the SIMDA botnet infrastructure was coordinated and executed from IGCI's Cyber Fusion Centre in the weeks before the opening, as was revealed at the launch event.
Leadership
Secretaries General
Main article: Secretary General of InterpolPresidents
Main article: President of InterpolPaul Dickopf (1968–1972)
Under the Nazi government of Adolf Hitler, Paul Dickopf was a member of the National Socialist German Students' League, Sturmabteilung and the Schutzstaffel before and during World War II.
Dickopf was elected as the president of Interpol in 1968, apparently aided by the good contacts of François Genoud to the Arab world. While his former Nazi connections were known, he maintained his post until 1972.
Jackie Selebi (2004–2008)
After being charged of corruption in January 2008, Jackie Selebi resigned as president of Interpol and was put on extended leave as National Police Commissioner of South Africa.
In July 2010 Selebi was found guilty of corruption by the South African High Court in Johannesburg for accepting bribes worth €156,000 from a drug trafficker.
Khoo Boon Hui (2008–2012)
Jackie Selebi was temporarily replaced by Arturo Herrera Verdugo [es], the National Commissioner of Investigations Police of Chile and former vice president for the American Zone, who remained acting president until the appointment of Singaporean Khoo Boon Hui in October 2008.
Mireille Ballestrazzi (2012–2016)
On November 8, 2012, the 81st General Assembly closed with the election of Deputy Central Director of the French Judicial Police, Mireille Ballestrazzi, as the first female president of the organization.
Meng Hongwei (2016–2018)
In November 2016, Meng Hongwei, a politician from the People’s Republic of China, was elected president during the 85th Interpol General Assembly, and was to serve in this capacity until 2020.
At the end of September 2018, Meng was reported missing during a trip to China, after being “taken away” for questioning by discipline authorities. Chinese police later confirmed that Meng had been arrested on charges of bribery as part of a national anti-corruption campaign. On October 7, 2018, INTERPOL announced that Meng had resigned his post with immediate effect and that the Presidency would be temporarily occupied by Interpol Senior Vice-president (Asia) Kim Jong Yang of South Korea.
Kim Jong Yang (2018–2021)
On November 21, 2018, Interpol’s General Assembly elected Kim Jong Yang to fill the remainder of Meng’s term, in a controversial election which saw accusations that the other candidate, Vice President Alexander Prokopchuk of Russia, had used Interpol notices to target critics of the Russian government.
Four American senators had accused Vice President Alexander Prokopchuk of abusing Red Notices, likening his election to "putting a fox in charge of the henhouse". A statement posted by the Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights Union and signed by other NGOs raised concerns about his ability to use his Interpol position to silence Russia's critics. Russian politicians criticized the U.S. accusation as politically motivated interference.
Ahmed Nase Al-Raisi (2021 – )
On November 25, 2021, Ahmed Naser Al-Raisi, inspector general of the United Arab Emirates’s interior ministry, was elected as president. The election was controversial due to the UAE’s human rights record, with concerns being raised by some human rights groups (e.g. Human Rights Watch) and some MEPs.
In June 2021, 35 French Parliamentarians, Members of Parliament and Senators, including from the majority and the opposition, urged President Emmanuel Macron to oppose the candidacy of the UAE's General Ahmed Nasser Al-Raisi, citing the accusations of torture against him. It was the second appeal by the deputy of the Rhône, Hubert Julien-Laferrière, who had first written to Macron earlier in 2021. He questioned how a profile like Al-Raisi's, who was responsible for the torture of political opponent Ahmed Mansoor and of a British academic Matthew Hedges, can become the president of a most respectable institution.
While the UAE was arranging trips for Al-Raisi to Interpol's member countries, opposition against the Emirati candidate amplified. A number of German MPs signed a petition to express "deep concern" and reject the candidacy of Al-Raisi for the post of Interpol director. Rodney Dixon, the British lawyer of Matthew Hedges and Ali Ahmad, submitted a complaint and urged the Swedish authorities to arrest Al-Raisi upon his arrival in Sweden. The two Britons also raised a similar request to arrest al-Raisi with the Norwegian police authorities. Both Sweden and Norway apply jurisdiction that allows them to open investigations of crime, irrespective of a person's nationality or the origin country of the crime.
In October 2021, Al-Raisi had to face further opposition, as the lawyers submitted a complaint to the French Prosecutor in Paris. The claims cited Al-Raisi's role in the unlawful detention and torture of Ali Issa Ahmad and Matthew Hedges. Filed under the principle of universal jurisdiction, the complaint gave French officials the authority to investigate and arrest foreign nationals. As Raisi is not a head of state, French authorities had all the rights to arrest and question him on entering the French territory.
As the General Assembly was approaching, the opposition was rising. In November 2021, a Turkish lawyer Gulden Sonmez filed a criminal complaint against Al-Raisi's nomination in Turkey, where the vote was to take place. Sonmez said the Emirates' attempt to cover its human rights records and to launder its reputation. Besides, Hedges and Ahmad were also expected to file a lawsuit in Turkey against Al-Raisi, ahead of the General Assembly.
Criticism
Abusive requests for Interpol arrests
See also: Police misconduct, Transnational repression, and LawfareDespite its politically neutral stance, some have criticized the agency for its role in arrests that critics contend were politically motivated. In their declaration, adopted in Oslo (2010), Monaco (2012), Istanbul (2013), and Baku (2014), the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) criticized some OSCE member States for their abuse of mechanisms of the international investigation and urged them to support the reform of Interpol in order to avoid politically motivated prosecution. The resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 31 January 2014 criticizes the mechanisms of operation of the Commission for the Control of Interpol's files, in particular, non-adversarial procedures and unjust decisions. In 2014, PACE adopted a decision to thoroughly analyse the problem of the abuse of Interpol and to compile a special report on this matter. In May 2015, within the framework of the preparation of the report, the PACE Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights organized a hearing in Yerevan, during which both representatives of NGOs and Interpol had the opportunity to speak. According to Freedom House, Russia is responsible for 38% of Interpol's public Red Notices. There currently are "approximately 66,370 valid Red Notices, of which some 7,669 are public."
Refugees who are included in the list of Interpol can be arrested when crossing the border. In the year 2008, the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees pointed to the problem of arrests of refugees on the request of INTERPOL in connection with politically motivated charges.
In 2021, Turkey, China, the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Russia, and Venezuela were accused of abusing Interpol by using it to target political opponents. China used Interpol against the Uyghurs, where the government issued a Red Notice against activists and other members of the ethnic minority group living abroad. Since 1997, 1,546 cases from 28 countries of detention and deportation of the Uyghurs were recorded. In the case of Turkey, Interpol had to turn down 800 requests, including one for NBA basketball player Enes Kanter Freedom. The UAE was also accused as one of the countries attempting to buy influence in Interpol. Using the Interpol Foundation for a Safer World, the Arab nation gave donations of $54 million. The amount was estimated as equal to the statutory contributions together made by the rest 194 members. It was asserted that the Emirates' growing influence over Interpol gave it the opportunity to host the General Assembly in 2018 and in 2020 (that was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic).
World
Organizations such as Detained in Dubai, Open Dialog Foundation, Fair Trials International, Centre for Peace Studies, and International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, indicate that non-democratic states use Interpol to harass opposition politicians, journalists, human rights activists, and businessmen. The countries accused of abusing the agency include China, Russia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Iran, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Venezuela, and Tunisia.
The Open Dialog Foundation's report analysed 44 high-profile political cases which went through the Interpol system. A number of persons who have been granted refugee status in the European Union (EU) and the US—including Russian businessman Andrey Borodin, Chechen Arbi Bugaev, Kazakh opposition politician Mukhtar Ablyazov and his associate Artur Trofimov, and Sri Lankan journalist Chandima Withana —continue to remain on the public INTERPOL list. Some of the refugees remain on the list even after courts have refused to extradite them to a non-democratic state (for example, Pavel Zabelin, a witness in the case of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and Alexandr Pavlov, former security chief of the Kazakh oppositionist Ablyazov). Another case is Manuel Rosales, a politician who opposed Hugo Chavez and fled to Peru in 2009 and was subject to a red alert on charges of corruption for two weeks. Interpol deleted the request for prosecution immediately. Interpol has also been criticized for mistaking people on yellow alerts. One case was Alondra Díaz-Nuñez, who in April 2015 was apprehended in Guanajuato City, Mexico being mistaken for a missing American teenager. Interpol came under heavy criticism from Mexican news and media for helping out Policia Federal Ministerial, Mexican Federal Police, and the U.S. Embassy and Consulate in Mexico, in what was believed to be a kidnapping.
Eastern Europe
The 2013 PACE's Istanbul Declaration of the OSCE cited specific cases of such prosecution, including those of the Russian activist Petr Silaev, financier William Browder, businessman Ilya Katsnelson, Belarusian politician Ales Michalevic, and Ukrainian politician Bohdan Danylyshyn.
On 25 July 2014, despite Interpol's Constitution prohibiting them from undertaking any intervention or activities of a political or military nature, the Ukrainian nationalist paramilitary leader Dmytro Yarosh was placed on Interpol's international wanted list at the request of Russian authorities, which made him the only person wanted internationally after the beginning of the 2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine. For a long time, Interpol refused to place former President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych on the wanted list as a suspect by the new Ukrainian government for the mass killing of protesters during Euromaidan. Yanukovych was eventually placed on the wanted list on 12 January 2015. However, on 16 July 2015, after an intervention of Joseph Hage Aaronson, the British law firm hired by Yanukovych, the international arrest warrant against the former president of Ukraine was suspended pending further review. In December 2014, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) liquidated a sabotage and reconnaissance group that was led by a former agent of the Ukrainian Bureau of INTERPOL that also has family relations in the Ukrainian counter-intelligence agencies. In 2014, Russia made attempts to place Ukrainian politician Ihor Kolomoyskyi and Ukrainian civic activist Pavel Ushevets, subject to criminal persecution in Russia following his pro-Ukrainian art performance in Moscow, on the Interpol wanted list.
On October 30, 2023, Belarusian filmmaker Andrey Gnyot got arrested when he landed in Belgrade as he was put on an Interpol warrant list. He is accused by the Belarusian authorities of tax evasion and issued an extradition request. During the 2020–2021 Belarusian protests, Gnyot co-founded the Free Association of Athletes (SOS-BY), bringing together athletes opposed to the Lukashenko regime. He spent seven months in detention in Belgrade before being transferred to house arrest in June 2024. Amnesty International called on the Serbian authorities to cease the extradition process.
Middle East
According to a report by the Stockholm Center for Freedom that was issued in September 2017, Turkey has weaponized Interpol mechanisms to hunt down legitimate critics and opponents in violation of Interpol's own constitution. The report lists abuse cases where not only arrest warrants but also revocation of travel documents and passports were used by Turkey as persecution tools against critics and opponents. The harassment campaign targeted foreign companies as well. Syrian-Kurd Salih Muslim was briefly detained at Turkey's request on 25 February 2018 in Prague, the capital of the Czech Republic, but was released 2 days later, drawing angry protests from Turkey. On 17 March 2018, the Czech authorities dismissed Turkey's request as lacking merit.
After a senior UAE government official, Ahmed Naser Al-Raisi became the President, Interpol ignored an injunction by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), and cooperated with Serbian authorities to extradite a Bahraini activist. Ahmed Jaafar Mohamed Ali was extradited to Bahrain in a charter aircraft of Royal Jet, a private Emirati airline headed by an Abu Dhabi royal family member. Critics raised concerns that it was just first example of how "red lines will be crossed" under the presidency of Al-Raisi. Besides, a warning was raised that after its decision, Interpol will be complicit in any abuse that Ali will face. In 2021 it was reported that Ahmed Naser had also allegedly tortured a number of people in the UAE before.
Appeals and requests withdrawals
The procedure for filing an appeal with Interpol is a long and complex one. For example, the Venezuelan journalist Patricia Poleo and a colleague of Kazakh activist Ablyazov, and Tatiana Paraskevich, who were granted refugee status, sought to overturn the politically motivated request for as long as one and a half years, and six months, respectively.
Interpol has previously recognized some requests to include persons on the wanted list as politically motivated, e.g., Indonesian activist Benny Wenda, Georgian politician Givi Targamadze, ex-president of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili, ex-mayor of Maracaibo and 2006 Venezuelan presidential election candidate Manuel Rosales and ex-president of Honduras Manuel Zelaya Rosales; these persons have subsequently been removed. However, in most cases, Interpol removes a Red Notice against refugees only after an authoritarian state closes a criminal case or declares amnesty (for example, the cases of Russian activists and political refugees Petr Silaev, Denis Solopov, and Aleksey Makarov, as well as the Turkish sociologist and feminist Pinar Selek).
Diplomacy
In 2016, Taiwan criticized Interpol for turning down its application to join the General Assembly as an observer. The United States supported Taiwan's participation, and the US Congress passed legislation directing the Secretary of State to develop a strategy to obtain observer status for Taiwan.
The election of Meng Hongwei, a Chinese national, as president and Alexander Prokopchuk, a Russian, as vice president of Interpol for Europe drew criticism in anglophone media and raised fears of Interpol accepting politically motivated requests from China and Russia.
Business
In 2013, Interpol was criticized over its multimillion-dollar deals with such private sector bodies as FIFA, Philip Morris, and the pharmaceutical industry. The criticism was mainly about the lack of transparency and potential conflicts of interest, such as Codentify. After the 2015 FIFA scandal, the organization has severed ties with all the private-sector bodies that evoked such criticism, and has adopted a new and transparent financing framework.
Reform
From 1 to 3 July 2015, Interpol organized a session of the Working Group on the Processing of Information, which was formed specifically in order to verify the mechanisms of information processing. The Working Group heard the recommendations of civil society as regards the reform of the international investigation system and promised to take them into account, in light of possible obstruction or refusal to file crime reports nationally.
The Open Dialog Foundation, a human rights organization, recommended that Interpol, in particular: create a mechanism for the protection of rights of people having international refugee status; initiate closer cooperation of the Commission for the Control of Files with human rights NGOs and experts on asylum and extradition; enforce sanctions for violations of Interpol's rules; strengthen cooperation with NGOs, the UN, OSCE, the PACE, and the European Parliament.
Fair Trials International proposed to create effective remedies for individuals who are wanted under a Red Notice on unfair charges; to penalize nations which frequently abuse the Interpol system; to ensure more transparency of Interpol's work.
The Centre for Peace Studies also created recommendations for Interpol, in particular, to delete Red Notices and Diffusions for people who were granted refugee status according to 1951 Refugee Convention issued by their countries of origin, and to establish an independent body to review Red Notices on a regular basis.
Emblem
The current emblem of Interpol was adopted in 1950 and includes the following elements:
- the globe indicates worldwide activity
- the olive branches represent peace
- the sword represents police action
- the scales signify justice
- the acronyms "OIPC" and "ICPO", representing the full name of the organization in both French and English, respectively.
Membership
Members
Interpol currently has 196 member countries:
Interpol members |
---|
|
Subnational-bureaus
- American Samoa
- Anguilla
- Bermuda
- British Virgin Islands
- Cayman Islands
- Gibraltar
- Hong Kong
- Montserrat
- Macau
- Puerto Rico
- Turks and Caicos Islands
- United Nations for Kosovo
Exclusions
Two member states of the United Nations and three partially-recognized states are currently not members of Interpol: North Korea and Tuvalu, as well as Kosovo, Taiwan, and Western Sahara.
The Republic of China (Taiwan) joined Interpol in September 1961. After the People's Republic of China was seated as "China" in the UN, Interpol transferred its recognition from the ROC to the PRC in September 1984.
In 2023, over 60 Interpol member states voiced their support for Taiwan's bid to re-join the organization. Specifically, representatives from Taiwan's diplomatic allies Eswatini, Palau, Paraguay, Belize, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, the Marshall Islands, and Saint Kitts and Nevis spoke up for Taiwan during the assembly.
See also
- Cybercrime
- Europol, a similar EU-wide organization.
- Intelligence assessment
- International Criminal Court
- Interpol notice
- Interpol Terrorism Watch List
- Interpol Travel Document
- InterPortPolice
- Operation Identify Me
- UN Police
Explanatory notes
- Interpol also maintains a liaison office to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime in Vienna
References
- ^ "Constitution of the International Criminal Police Organization" (PDF). INTERPOL. 1956. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 February 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- "General Regulations of the International Criminal Police Organization" (PDF). Interpol, Office of Legal Affairs. 1956. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- ^ "Who we are | Name and logo". INTERPOL. Archived from the original on 26 October 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2024.
- Wells, John (2007) . Longman Pronunciation Dictionary (New / Paperback (9th impression) ed.). Harlow: Pearson Longman. p. 398. ISBN 978-0-582-36467-7. Retrieved 30 January 2024 – via Internet Archive Book Reader.
- ^ "General Secretariat". www.interpol.int. Archived from the original on 30 March 2020. Retrieved 19 March 2020.
- Mathieu Deflem, Policing World Society: Historical Foundations of International Police Cooperation (Oxford University Press, 2004) p. 125
- ^ "7. September 1923 – Interpol wird gegründet" [September 7, 1923 – Interpol is founded]. Westdeutscher Rundfunk (in German). 7 September 2013. Archived from the original on 7 September 2022. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
- Posner, Gerald (6 March 1990). "Opinion | Interpol's Nazi Affiliations Continued After War". The New York Times. p. A-22. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 7 September 2022. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
- Sweet O.C., David (September 2010). "INTERPOL DVI best-practice standards—An overview". Forensic Science International. 201 (1–3): 18–21. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.031. PMID 20303223. ProQuest 1034458337.
- "INTERPOL Executive Committee selects Brazil's Valdecy Urquiza as its candidate for next Secretary General". interpol.int. 25 June 2024.
- "Neutrality (Article 3 of the Constitution)". INTERPOL. Archived from the original on 31 March 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- Gerspacher, Nadia (2008). "The history of international police cooperation: a 150-year evolution in trends and approaches". Global Crime. 9 (1–2): 169–184. doi:10.1080/17440570701862892. ISSN 1744-0572. S2CID 154119454.
- Deflem, M. (2000). "Bureaucratization and Social Control: Historical Foundations of International Police Cooperation". Law & Society Review. 34 (3): 739–778. doi:10.2307/3115142. JSTOR 3115142. Archived from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "12 wishes: then and now". www.interpol.int. Archived from the original on 19 March 2020. Retrieved 20 March 2020.
- Deflem, M. (2000). "Bureaucratization and Social Control: Historical Foundations of International Police Cooperation". Law & Society Review. 34 (3): 739–778. doi:10.2307/3115142. JSTOR 3115142. Archived from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Interpol: Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). Fair Trials International. November 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 March 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- "Interpol Member States: The United Kingdom". Interpol. Archived from the original on 4 October 2011. Retrieved 17 August 2012.
- "Interpol Member States: The United States". Interpol. Archived from the original on 17 December 2011. Retrieved 5 January 2012.
-
- "Key dates". interpol.int. Retrieved 15 September 2023.
- Roseman, Mark (2002). The Villa, The Lake, The Meeting: Wannsee and the Final Solution. London: Allen Lane. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-71-399570-1.
- Published in the United States as The Wannsee Conference and the Final Solution: A Reconsideration. New York: Picador, 2002.
- Deflem, Mathieu (2002). "The Logic of Nazification: The Case of the International Criminal Police Commission ('Interpol')". International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 43 (1): 21. doi:10.1177/002071520204300102. S2CID 145091279. Archived from the original on 25 March 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- Barnett, M.; Coleman, L. (2005). "Designing Police: INTERPOL and the Study of Change in International Organizations". International Studies Quarterly. 49 (4): 593. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00380.x.
- "Police search for the names of 22 women murdered". BBC News. 10 May 2023. Archived from the original on 10 May 2023. Retrieved 10 May 2023.
- Gilsinan, Kathy (12 May 2014). "Interpol at 100: Does the World's Police Force Work?". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 16 April 2023. Retrieved 7 April 2022.
- Lee, Michael. "Interpol hopes physical border security will solve virtual borders". ZDNet. Archived from the original on 29 January 2023. Retrieved 7 April 2022.
- Stearns, Peter N. (2008). Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern World. doi:10.1093/acref/9780195176322.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-517632-2.
- ^ Helmut K. Anheier; Mark Juergensmeyer (2012). Encyclopedia of Global Studies. SAGE Publications. pp. 956–958. ISBN 978-1-4129-6429-6.
- "About Notices". www.interpol.int. Retrieved 10 June 2023.
- ^ Annual Report 2019 (PDF) (Report). INTERPOL. Retrieved 1 March 2021.
- "INTERPOL issues its first-ever passports". Singapore: INTERPOL. 13 October 2009. Archived from the original on 12 January 2015. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
- Ravid, Barak (27 September 2017). "Interpol Votes to Accept 'State of Palestine' as Member Country". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 27 September 2017. Retrieved 27 September 2017.
- "Interpol foundation shows HSBC boss the door". swissinfo.ch. Swissinfo. 24 February 2015. Archived from the original on 23 March 2018. Retrieved 22 March 2018.
- "AG-2004-RES-05: Appointment of Interpol External Auditor" (PDF). Cancún: INTERPOL. 8 October 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 March 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- "Questions and Answers: What is Canada's financial contribution to INTERPOL?". Royal Canadian Mounted Police. 17 March 2010. Archived from the original on 25 March 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- "Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2011" (PDF). Interpol. 25 May 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2015. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
- "Audit assignments and secondments". Riksrevisjonen – Office of the Auditor General of Norway. Archived from the original on 1 July 2013. Retrieved 1 July 2013.
- "General Secretariat". Interpol. Retrieved 28 November 2024.
- "Command & Coordination Centre". Interpol. Archived from the original on 18 August 2013. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
- "Order on Interpol Work Inside U.S. Irks Conservatives". The New York Times. New York. 30 December 2009. Archived from the original on 25 March 2017. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
- "Official opening of Interpol's office of its Special Representative to the European Union marks milestone in co-operation". Brussels: Interpol. 25 September 2009. Archived from the original on 24 November 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
- "S'pore, Interpol reaffirm excellent partnership". Singapore: Channel NewsAsia. 22 May 2013. Archived from the original on 10 July 2013. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
- Michael Sontheimer (14 January 2011). "Ein freischaffender Nazi". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 11 April 2024.
- Dieter Schenk (2003). Die braunen Wurzeln des BKA (Die Zeit des Nationalsozialismus ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuchverlag. p. 303. ISBN 3-596-15782-X. Schenk cites an unpublished dossier of the weekly journal Der Spiegel.
- Posner, Gerald (6 March 1990). "Interpol's Nazi Affiliations Continued After War". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 February 2012.
In 1968, Interpol elected Paul Dickopf as its president. Although it was discovered that he had been an SS officer in the war, having worked in the very villa where Interpol and the Gestapo were headquartered, he nevertheless remained president until 1972.
- Craig Timberg (13 January 2008). "S. African Chief of Police Put on Leave". The Washington Post. Rustenburg. Archived from the original on 11 November 2014. Retrieved 9 July 2013.
- "Ex-S Africa police chief convicted". Al Jazeera. 2 July 2010. Archived from the original on 2 November 2012. Retrieved 30 November 2010.
- "INTERPOL President Jackie Selebi resigns from post". Lyon: INTERPOL. 13 January 2008. Archived from the original on 31 March 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- "France's Ballestrazzi becomes first female President of Interpol". Rome: Interpol. 8 November 2012. Archived from the original on 4 July 2014. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
- "Interpol: Mireille Ballestrazzi". Interpol. Archived from the original on 30 November 2016. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
- "Interpol: President". Interpol. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 29 November 2016.
- "Missing Interpol president Meng Hongwei 'under investigation' in China". South China Morning Post. 5 October 2018. Archived from the original on 19 November 2018. Retrieved 10 October 2020.
- "Interpol plea on missing president". BBC News. 6 October 2018. Archived from the original on 8 October 2018. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
- "French police launch investigation after Interpol chief goes missing for a week in China". The Independent. Archived from the original on 5 October 2018. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
- "Detained Interpol chief 'took bribes'". BBC News. 8 October 2018. Archived from the original on 22 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
- "N2018-139 / 2018 / News / News and media / Internet / Home – INTERPOL". interpol.int. Archived from the original on 21 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
- "Russia loses Interpol presidency vote". BBC News. 21 November 2018. Archived from the original on 26 November 2018. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
- "Likely next Interpol chief Prokopchuk 'fox in the henhouse', US senators say". BBC. 20 November 2018. Archived from the original on 20 November 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- "NGO, human rights groups from different countries oppose election of Russia's representative as president of INTERPOL". Interfax. 19 November 2018. Archived from the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- "Russia Denounces "Interference" At Interpol Leadership Vote". Archived from the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 21 November 2018.
- "France must not accept a torturer at the head of Interpol". Marianne. 18 June 2021. Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 18 June 2021.
- Johnson, Jamie (October 2020). "Exclusive: UAE police chief accused of presiding over torture of British academic running to be head of Interpol". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 1 October 2020. Retrieved 1 October 2020.
- "German MPs Sign Petition Against UAE candidate for Interpol". ICFUAE. 15 November 2021. Archived from the original on 15 November 2021. Retrieved 15 November 2021.
- "Germany MPs Reject UAE Candidate For INTERPOL Head". Emirates Leaks. 14 November 2021. Archived from the original on 8 April 2022. Retrieved 14 November 2021.
- "Top candidate for Interpol accused of torture – reported in Sweden". Aftonbladet. 4 November 2021. Archived from the original on 23 November 2021. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
- "Matthew Hedges: Tweet on complaint filed against al-Raisi in Sweden". Twitter. Archived from the original on 4 November 2021. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
- "They were arrested and tortured. The man they believe is responsible could be Interpol's next president". Nouvelles du monde. 13 November 2021. Archived from the original on 15 November 2021. Retrieved 13 November 2021.
- "Torture Complaint Filed Against U.A.E. Candidate For Interpol Chief". Forbes. Archived from the original on 5 October 2021. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
- "Calls for Turkey to arrest UAE candidate for Interpol chief". Middle East Monitor. 9 November 2021. Archived from the original on 2 January 2020. Retrieved 9 November 2021.
- "'He is responsible for torture': nominee for Interpol chief accused by detained Britons". The Guardian. 20 November 2021. Archived from the original on 27 November 2021. Retrieved 20 November 2021.
- "Former Interpol chief admits guilt in Chinese court hearing". The Asahi Shimbun. Reuters. 20 June 2019. Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 9 March 2020.
- Matt Apuzzo (22 March 2019). "How Strongmen Turned Interpol into Their Personal Weapon". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2 January 2020. Retrieved 23 March 2019.
- "2010 Oslo Annual Session". oscepa.org. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
- "Se confirma victoria europeísta en elecciones ucranianas avaladas por la OSCE" [Europeanist victory confirmed in Ukrainian elections endorsed by the OSCE] (in Spanish). OSCE PA. 27 October 2014. Archived from the original on 19 September 2015.
- "Kiew hat ein neues Parlament, aber keine Aufbruchstimmung" [Kyiv has a new parliament, but no lift in mood] (in German). OSCE PA. 27 October 2014. Archived from the original on 19 September 2015.
- "2014 Baku Annual Session". oscepa.org. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
- Beneyto, José María (17 December 2013). "Doc. 13370: Accountability of international organizations for human rights violations". Council of Europe. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- "Vote on Resolution: Assembly's voting results: Vote of José María BENEYTO (EPP/CD)". assembly.coe.int. 2014. Archived from the original on 25 March 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
- "Parliamentary Assembly". coe.int. Archived from the original on 17 August 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "Synopsis of the meeting held in Yerevan, Armenia on 19–20 May 2015" (PDF). Council of Europe. 26 May 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 24 February 2016.
- Russia: Transnational Repression Case Study Archived 21 October 2021 at the Wayback Machine Freedomhouse, 2021
- About Red Notices Archived 25 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine Interpol. 2021.
- ^ "Policy report: INTERPOL and human rights". FairTrials.org. 26 November 2013. Archived from the original on 14 November 2015. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (18 January 2008). ""Terrorism as a Global Phenomenon", UNHCR presentation to the Joint Seminar of the Strategic Committee on Immigration, Frontiers and Asylum (SCIFA) and Committee on Article 36 (CATS)" (PDF). UNHCR. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 24 February 2016.
- "Weaponizing the Police: Authoritarian Abuse of Interpol". Harvard International Review. 11 April 2022. Archived from the original on 7 September 2022. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
- Jacobs, Josh (17 October 2021). "Has Interpol become the long arm of oppressive regimes?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
- ^ "As China targets Uyghurs worldwide, democracies must prevent Interpol abuse". The Hill. August 2021. Archived from the original on 2 January 2020. Retrieved 1 August 2021.
- "Incidents of Transnational Repression". The Oxus Society for Central Asian Affairs. Archived from the original on 2 January 2020. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
- Willsher, Kim (25 November 2021). "Turkey accused of using Interpol summit to crack down on critics". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 August 2022. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
- Meacham, Sam (11 April 2022). "Weaponizing the Police: Authoritarian Abuse of Interpol". Harvard International Review. Archived from the original on 7 September 2022. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
- "UAE pledges EUR 50 million to support seven key INTERPOL projects". Interpol. Archived from the original on 2 January 2020. Retrieved 27 March 2017.
- ^ "The report: The Interpol system is in need of reform". The Open Dialog Foundation. 24 February 2015. Archived from the original on 30 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Safeguarding nonrefoulement within Interpol's mechanisms". Safeguarding non-refoulement within Interpol's mechanisms – CMS. Archived from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- ^ "Interpol's Red Notices used by some to pursue political dissenters, opponents". International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. 16 March 2012. Archived from the original on 6 July 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Allen-Ebrahimian, Bethany (21 April 2017). "Interpol Is Helping Enforce China's Political Purges". Archived from the original on 27 August 2017. Retrieved 1 September 2017.
- "INTERPOL". interpol.int. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
- "INTERPOL". interpol.int. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "INTERPOL". interpol.int. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015.
- "INTERPOL". interpol.int. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "INTERPOL". interpol.int. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "INTERPOL". interpol.int. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "INTERPOL". interpol.int. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "Venezuela: Interpol seeks arrest of Chavez foe". NBC News. 24 April 2009. Archived from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 16 June 2021.
- "Alondra Díaz-Nuñez case". BBC News. 12 December 2024. Retrieved 12 December 2024.
- "Neutrality (Article 3 of the Constitution)". INTERPOL.int. 1956. Archived from the original on 16 March 2015. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- Mark Rachkevych (25 July 2014). "Interpol issues wanted notice for nationalist leader Yarosh at Russia's behest". Kyiv Post. Archived from the original on 25 July 2014.
- Інтерпол відмовився оголосити у розшук Януковича і К° [Interpol has declined putting Yanukovych and Co on wanted list] (in Ukrainian). Ukrinform. 8 December 2014. Archived from the original on 10 August 2015.
- МВС розслідує політичні мотиви Інтерполу у справах Януковича і Ко [Ministry of Internal Affairs is investigating Interpol's political motives regarding Yanukovych and Co] (in Ukrainian). Ukrinform. 17 November 2014. Archived from the original on 3 July 2015.
- "YANUKOVYCH, VIKTOR: Wanted by the judicial authorities of Ukraine for prosecution / to serve a sentence". 2014. Archived from the original on 12 January 2015. Retrieved 12 January 2015.
- "Ex-Ukrainian president Yanukovych no longer on Interpol wanted list". uatoday.tv. Archived from the original on 22 July 2015.
- Групою бойовиків керував колишній працівник Інтерполу – СБУ [Group of militants was run by a former employee of Interpol – SBU]. Ukrayinska Pravda (in Ukrainian). 19 December 2014. Archived from the original on 13 March 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- Andriy Osavoliyk (17 September 2014). "Russia continues to abuse the mechanisms of international criminal prosecution". The Open Dialog Foundation. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- "Lawyer of Belarus Activist Trapped in Serbia: Indictment is Pure Politics". Balkan Insight. 1 March 2024.
- "Serbia: Activist Andrei Gnyot must not be extradited to Belarus". Amnesty International. 27 June 2024.
- Stockholm Center for Freedom (September 2017). "Abuse of the Interpol System by Turkey" (PDF). Stockholm Center for Freedom. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 October 2017. Retrieved 5 October 2017.
- "A Shameful case". Yekta Uzunoglu. Archived from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 5 July 2018.
- "Czechs release Syrian Kurdish leader, won't extradite to Turkey". Al Monitor. 27 February 2018. Archived from the original on 5 July 2018. Retrieved 17 May 2020.
- "Serbia extradites Bahraini dissident in cooperation with Interpol". The Guardian. 25 January 2022. Archived from the original on 2 January 2020. Retrieved 25 January 2022.
- "UAE general accused of torture elected Interpol president". BBC News. 25 November 2021. Archived from the original on 6 May 2022. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
- Ida Karlsson. "Interpol accused of undermining justice". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 1 January 2020. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "UA:295/13 Index:EUR 71/008/2013 – Urgent Action: Woman faces torture if extradited" (PDF). Amnesty International. 21 October 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 March 2016. Retrieved 24 February 2016.
- "Written question – Impact of Interpol Red Notice on Schengen Information System- E-009196/2015". Europa (web portal). Archived from the original on 25 March 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "Интерпол и Литва сочли преследование Таргамадзе политическим". lenta.ru. Archived from the original on 13 June 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Прес-служба Одеської ОДА про рішення Інтерполу [Press service of the Odesa Regional State Administration on the Interpol decision]. odessa.gov.ua (in Ukrainian). 31 July 2015. Archived from the original on 16 March 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- "PR065 / 2009 / News / News and media / Internet / Home". interpol.int. Archived from the original on 10 September 2015. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
- "INTERPOL reinstates alert against Russian refugee". FairTrials.org. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013.
- "Грани.Ру: Фигуранты 'химкинского дела' Солопов и Силаев амнистированы – Амнистия". grani.ru. Archived from the original on 18 March 2016. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "В ФРГ арестован беженец из России Алексей Макаров. – Русская планета". rusplt.ru. Archived from the original on 29 April 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "Turkey: Sociologist Pınar Selek acquitted for the fourth time in 16 years". pen-international.org. Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
- "Taiwan excluded from Interpol meet". Archived from the original on 7 March 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "S.2426 – A bill to direct the Secretary of State to develop a strategy to obtain observer status for Taiwan in the International Criminal Police Organization, and for other purposes". 18 March 2016. Archived from the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
- Robbie Gramer (10 November 2016). "China and Russia Take the Helm of Interpol". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 14 February 2017. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- "China to push for greater cooperation on graft, terrorism at Interpol meeting". Reuters. 24 September 2017. Archived from the original on 18 October 2017. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- Jonathan Kaiman (10 November 2016). "Chinese public security official named head of Interpol, raising concerns among human rights advocates". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 26 July 2017. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
- Mathieu Martinière; Robert Schmidt (30 October 2013). "The smoke and mirrors of the tobacco industry's funding of Interpol". Mediapart. Archived from the original on 19 September 2015. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- Trina Tune. "Industry-INTERPOL deal signals challenges to illicit trade protocol". fctc.org. Archived from the original on 28 June 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Robert Schmidt; Mathieu Martiniere (21 October 2013). "Interpol: Wer hilft hier wem?". Die Zeit.
- Robert Schmidt; Mathieu Martiniere (7 June 2013). "Tabakindustrie: Interpol, die Lobby und das Geld". Die Zeit. Archived from the original on 16 August 2021. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- Luk Joossens; Anna B Gilmore (12 March 2013). "The transnational tobacco companies' strategy to promote Codentify, their inadequate tracking and tracing standard" (PDF). BMJ. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 March 2016. Retrieved 24 February 2016.
- Robert Schmidt; Mathieu Martiniere (12 July 2013). "Interpol : le lobby du tabac se paie une vitrine". lyoncapitale.fr. Archived from the original on 22 February 2018. Retrieved 29 April 2021.
- "Working group starts review of Interpol's information processing mechanisms". interpol.int. 3 July 2015. Archived from the original on 10 March 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- Lyudmyla Kozlovska (14 July 2015). "ODF drafted recommendations on the reform of Interpol". The Open Dialog Foundation. Archived from the original on 13 March 2016. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- "Fair Trials Makes Recommendations to Interpol on Red Notice Abuse". FairTrials.org. 28 July 2015. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
- "INTERPOL member countries". www.interpol.int. Archived from the original on 22 February 2019. Retrieved 13 July 2021.
- "Afghanistan". Interpol. Archived from the original on 11 July 2022. Retrieved 24 July 2022.
- https://www.unmikonline.org/Pages/rollo.aspx] Archived 1 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine UNMIK.org
- "UNMIK Press Statement, 4 December 2017" (Press release). UNMIK. 4 December 2017. Archived from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
- "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 April 2023. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - Liu, Tzu-hsuan (6 December 2023). "Sixty countries support Taiwan's Interpol bid". Taipei Times. Retrieved 6 January 2024.
Further reading
- Deflem, Mathieu (2016). "INTERPOL". In Jennings, Wesley G. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Crime and Punishment. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Deflem, Mathieu (2024). "The Declining Significance of Interpol: Policing International Terrorism after 9/11". International Criminal Justice Review. 34: 5–19. doi:10.1177/10575677221136175. S2CID 253433589.
- Khodorkovsky, Mikhail (20 November 2018). "In Putin's era it's crazy to let a Russian lead Interpol. We must prevent it". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 March 2019.
- Martiniere, Mathieu; Schmidt, Robert (11 October 2023). Interpol: L'enquête: Révélations sur une police sous influence (in French). Harper Collins. ISBN 979-1033914846.
External links
- Media related to Interpol at Wikimedia Commons
- Official website
- INTERPOL Foundation for a Safer World
Articles and topics related to Interpol | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
45°46′56″N 4°50′54″E / 45.7822°N 4.8484°E / 45.7822; 4.8484
Categories: