Revision as of 20:49, 23 November 2008 edit86.138.118.196 (talk) →1700 - 1870← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:53, 15 October 2024 edit undoRchard2scout (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers35,777 edits Undid revision 1251271762 by 2001:EE0:52EE:89D0:8CD:3BAF:6A63:BDA4 (talk) rm non-english additionsTag: Undo | ||
(638 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Situation in which a military unit holds against overwhelming odds}} | |||
{{otheruses}} | |||
{{other uses|Last stand (disambiguation)}} | |||
{{Refimprove|date=June 2007}} | |||
{{Original research|date=September 2007}} | |||
{{POV|date=December 2007}} | |||
{{Copyedit|date=November 2007}} | |||
'''Last stand''' is a loose ] term used to describe a body of ] holding a defensive position in the face of overwhelming odds. The defensive force usually takes very heavy casualties or is completely destroyed, while also inflicting high casualties on the opponent. Except in rare exceptions, such as ] and the ], the defending force is usually annihilated. | |||
], depicts ] wielding his rifle as a club against Mexican troops in the ] in ] in 1836.]] | |||
The situation can arise in one of two ways. Sometimes, perhaps because of geography or lack of supplies or support, the troops in question cannot retreat from their position without being instantly destroyed by the enemy. At other times, the troops in question are forced to follow orders and cannot consider retreat, even though the moral choice is open to them. In both cases, surrender to the enemy is an option, but either the group as a whole or their commanding officer decides instead to "go down fighting". In some cases the soldiers may consider that ] may also result in their deaths, and that to fight to their deaths is a better choice in the circumstances. This sometimes comes from strategic or moral considerations, as the defenders conclude that their own sacrifice is essential to the wider success, or at least survival, of their campaign. | |||
], 1814. This painting is a juxtaposition of various historical and legendary elements from the ] in ] in 480 BC.]] | |||
] in July, 1539. Defense of a 4,000-man garrison in the service of ], against a 50,000-strong Ottoman assault force, resulting in a last stand. Painting by Pierre Mortier.]] | |||
] at ]'' in ] in ], painted by ]]] | |||
A '''last stand''' is a ] situation in which a body of ] holds a defensive position in the face of overwhelming and virtually insurmountable odds.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/last_stand|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180404200842/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/last_stand|url-status=dead|archive-date=April 4, 2018|title=last stand - Definition of last stand in English by Oxford Dictionaries|website=Oxford Dictionaries - English}}</ref> Troops may make a last stand due to a sense of duty; because they are defending a tactically crucial point; to buy time to enable a trapped army, person, or group of people to escape; due to fear of execution if captured; or to protect their ruler or leader. Last stands loom large in history, as the heroism and sacrifice of the defenders exert a large pull on the public's imagination. Some last stands have become a celebrated part of a fighting force's or a country's history, especially if the defenders accomplished their goals (or, in rare cases, defeated their attackers). | |||
A ] will often lead to a last stand by the defenders of the besieged ]. However, while sieges are generally characterised by a lengthy engagement, last stands are generally brief and decisive. | |||
==Tactical significance== | |||
== 480 BC - 1000 AD == | |||
A "last stand" is a last resort tactic, and is chosen because the defending force realizes or believes the benefits of fighting outweigh the benefits of retreat or surrender. This usually arises from strategic or moral considerations, such as staying and fighting to buy time for wounded soldiers or civilians to get to a safe place, leading defenders to conclude that their sacrifice is essential to the greater success of their campaign or cause, as happened at the end of the ].<ref>{{cite book |first=Charles |last=Rollin |author-link=Charles Rollin |year=1804 |title=The ancient history of the Egyptians, Carthaginians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Medes and Persians, Macedonians, and Grecians |volume=3 |edition=10 |publisher=Printed for W. J. & J. Richardson |page=}}</ref><ref name="auto">Hamm, Jean Shepherd. ''Term Paper Resource Guide to Medieval History''. Greenwood (November 25, 2009). pp. 88-90. {{ISBN|978-0313359675}}</ref> The situation can arise in several ways. One situation is that retreat by the defending force would lead to immediate defeat, usually due to the surrounding geography or shortage of supplies or support, as happened to the Royalist infantry on Wadborough Hill after the ].<ref>David Plant {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080509100109/http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/military/1645-leicester-naseby.htm |date=2008-05-09 }}, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170629235641/http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/military/1645-leicester-naseby.htm |date=2017-06-29 }} , Retrieved 2009-05-24</ref><ref>Martin Marix Evans, Graham Turner. ''Naseby 1645: The Triumph of the New Model Army'',, Osprey Publishing, 2007 {{ISBN|1-84603-078-1}}, {{ISBN|978-1-84603-078-9}}. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230817161137/https://books.google.com/books?id=gNobvgAACAAJ&dq=Wadborough+Hill++%22last+stand%22&pg=PA76 |date=2023-08-17 }}</ref> | |||
{| style="border:1px solid #A3B1BF; text-align:left; background:#f5faff" | |||
] (1566) -- ]'s charge from the fortress of ] (painting by ], 1825)]] | |||
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | |||
] in the ], ] in 1876 as depicted in a painting by ].]] | |||
| width="15%" style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Name''' | |||
] -- The last stand of Major Allan Wilson, Matabeleland, 4 December 1893.'']] | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Date''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Defending army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Attacking army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Ratio''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Details''' | |||
|-<!--1ST HEADING--> | |||
| colspan="6" style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.2em; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 0.9em; text-align:center;" | | |||
|-<!--1ST ROW 1ST COLUMN--> | |||
|] | |||
|480 BC | |||
|300 ]ns and 6,700 other ] | |||
|60,000 to 300,000 ] army (modern estimates)<ref>Thomas Kelly (]) (2003), "Persian Propaganda - A Neglected Factor in Xerxes' Invasion of Greece and Herodotus", ''Iranica Antiqua'' '''38''', p. 198, gives 60,000 to 300,000 as a common range of modern estimates.</ref><ref>Philip De Souza, ''The Greek and Persian Wars, 499-386 BC'', p. 41, gives 150,000 to 200,000 as a modern consensus.</ref> | |||
800,000 to 2,100,000 ] army (ancient sources) | |||
|1:9 to 1:43 | |||
1:114 to 1:300 | |||
|King ] and his Spartan soldiers, accompanied by a force of allied Greek city states, held back a much larger Persian force under ] for three days in one of the most memorable and eulogized last stands in ].<br>*Historical ranges vary (see ]). | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|330 BC | |||
|700<ref name=Iranica>, ].</ref> ] | |||
|10,000 to 17,000 ]<ref name=Iranica/> | |||
|1:25 | |||
|]es led the Persian resistance at the ], in a last stand against ] and killed a large number of Alexander's Macedonian troops. Despite Ariobarzanes' skillful tactics, Alexander defeated him and burned ] to the ground. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|326 BC | |||
|22,000 ] | |||
|41,000-135,000 ]ian army | |||
|1:2 to 1:6 | |||
|]' smaller ] ] army fell against ]'s large army near the ] in ], where Alexander's army suffered up to 4,300 casualties in another ]. Alexander was impressed and spared Porus' life. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|134-133 b.c.e. | |||
|~4,000 ] | |||
|60,000 ] | |||
|1:15 | |||
|The culminating and pacifying action of the long-running ] between the forces of the ] and those of the native ] population of ]. The city refused to surrender and starvation set in. Cannibalism ensued; eventually some began to commit suicide with their whole families. The remnant population finally surrendered only after setting their city on fire. Scipio took it and had its ruins levelled. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|Catiline Conspiracy | |||
|62 BC | |||
|Unknown | |||
|Unknown | |||
|Unknown | |||
|] and his army were annihilated at Pistoria (now ]). "eave to your enemies a bloody and mournful victory." | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|73 | |||
|1,000 Jews | |||
|15,000 Romans | |||
|1:15 | |||
|Jewish ] ] committed mass suicide rather than face the prospect of surrender to the Roman army at ] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|642 | |||
|100,000<ref>An Encyclopedia of Battles: Accounts of Over 1,560 Battles from 1479 B.C. to the Present By David Eggenberger, pg 305</ref>-150,000<ref>Age of Faith, Durrant</ref> | |||
|30,000 | |||
|3:1 to 5:1 | |||
|The ] fought its final battle against the Arab conquerors. The Arabs outmaneuvered and defeated the Sassanid force, effectively ending the empire. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|680 | |||
|73 | |||
|30,000+ | |||
|1:410 | |||
|]'s grandson ]- (Husayn, Son of Ali) with 71 men fought a military detachment from the forces of ], the ] ], numbering in the thousands, in ]. Husayn and all his men died. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|778 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|] and his warriors fought to the last man against the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|approximately 200 Anglo-Saxons | |||
|2,000-4,000 Vikings | |||
|1:10 to 1:20 | |||
|A handful of Anglo-Saxon warriors led by ] fought and were eventually overwhelmed by a force of 2,000 - 4,000 ]. | |||
|} | |||
Some military thinkers have cautioned against putting an opposing force into a last stand situation, recognising that trapped men will fight harder. ] wrote: ]. Similarly, they have sometimes suggested deliberately putting their own forces in such a situation, for example by burning boats or bridges that could tempt them to retreat.<ref>{{cite book|first=Tzu|last=Sun|author-link=Sun Tzu|title=The Art of War, Chapter XI 23-25|url=http://classics.mit.edu/Tzu/artwar.html|access-date=2019-05-09|archive-date=2018-03-08|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180308153259/http://classics.mit.edu/Tzu/artwar.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
== 1000 - 1700 == | |||
{| style="border:1px solid #A3B1BF; text-align:left; background:#f5faff" | |||
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | |||
| width="15%" style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Name''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Date''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Defending army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Attacking army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Ratio''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Details''' | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|1258 | |||
|50,000 ]is | |||
|150,000<ref name=Geographic/> ] | |||
|1:3 | |||
|The defending army of ] under ] made a last stand against ]'s large invading army consisting of ], ], ], ] and ]. The destruction of Baghdad brought an end to the ] and the ].<ref name=Geographic>'']'', University of Michigan, vol. 191, 1997: {{quote|"In 1253, the Persian writer ] recorded Hulagu's preparations for his Baghdad expedition. With the cavalry were a thousand expert artillerymen from China. The army swelled with troops from vassal states: Armenians, Georgians, Persians, Turks. By one estimate, the force grew to 150,000 men."}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|November 1330 | |||
|10,000 | |||
|30,000+ | |||
|1:3 | |||
|After having agreed to an armistice, Basarab's guides led the 30,000-strong Hungarian army into an ambush; the Hungarians were slaughtered by the 10,000-strong Wallachian army led by ]. When the Hungarian king ] saw his knights being killed, he gave his royal insignia to one of his captains (who was subsequently killed) and fought his way back to Hungary in disguise. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|January 1399 | |||
|Much smaller | |||
|Much larger | |||
| | |||
|The army of ] was stopped by Ilyaas Awaan, the military commander of ] Fort in northern ]. Tamerlane's experienced army vastly outnumbered Awaan's small defending force, but Awaan stopped Tamerlane for two months. It was only after the death of Awaan that Tamerlane's army was able to take the fort. Tamerlane developed great respect for Awaan and openely praised his bravery and courage. He later mentioned Awaan in his memoirs as the opponent who gave him the fiercest resistance with an extremely small force. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|June 1450 | |||
|1,500 Albanians | |||
|150,000 Ottomans | |||
|1:100 | |||
|After leaving a protective ] of 1,500 men under his trusted lieutenant ] (also known as ]), ] harassed the Ottoman camps around ] and attacked the supply caravans of ]'s army. By September, the Ottoman camp was in disarray, as morale sank and disease ran rampant. The Ottoman army acknowledged that the ] of Krujë would not fall by strength of arms, and lifted the siege and made their way to ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|May 1453 | |||
|7,000 ] and ] allies | |||
|80,000-200,000 Ottomans<ref>''Edwin Pears,'' The Destruction of the Greek Empire and the Story of the Capture of Constantinople by the Turks</ref> | |||
|1:11 to 1:21 | |||
|Constantinople was captured by the Turks under ] after a two-month siege. On ], ] the Turks stormed the city. Though the Byzantines and their Western allies held off the first two waves of the Turks, the third wave broke through. Emperor ], seeing that the battle was lost, begged his fellow soldiers to kill him: "the city is fallen but I yet live, isn't there a Christian here to take my head?" When his soldiers refused to, he stripped off his imperial insignia, and, sword in hand, fought to the death like a common foot soldier. His death signalled the death-knell of the ], bringing an end to the last remnant of the Roman Empire. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|1527 | |||
|189 Members of the Papal ] | |||
|20,000 rampaging troops of ], ] | |||
|1:106 | |||
|The city of Rome fell, after a hard fought battle, to the unruly army of Charles V, who had lost all control of his men. On ], ] the mercenaries and cuthroats of Charles' army stormed the walls of Vatican Hill and began to slaughter what was left of the defenders. After executing a number of men, the bulk of the raiders made their way to St. Peter's Basilica with the intent of looting Christianity's finest treasures. In order to buy time for ] to escape through a secret passage to the relative safety of ], the Papal Swiss Guard formed up on the steps of St. Peter's Basilica itself and fought for some time against the hordes of men attempting to enter the church. Of the 189 members of the Guard on duty that day, only 42 survived the brutal fighting. The Captain of the Guard was among the fallen. The occupation of Rome by the unruly forces of Charles V lasted for almost nine months. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|1552 | |||
|2,100 Hungarians | |||
|150,000 - 200,000 Ottomans (around 80,000 combat troops) | |||
|1:40 to 1:100 | |||
|Due to heavy losses in troops and morale, the Ottoman army ultimately retreated. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|1565 | |||
|700 Knights of Malta and 5,000 Maltese soldiers (mostly irregulars) | |||
|48,000 Ottomans (around 36,000 effective combat troops) | |||
|1:8 | |||
|Ottomans chose to besiege Maltese islands in order to later invade Italy after conquering Malta. The Knights Hospitaller made a last stand to provide time for the Christian to kingdoms prepare for the Ottoman threat. The main mistake of the Ottomans was failure to attack the biggest Maltese forts, ] and ], instead exhausting their force taking Fort St. Elmo and Birgu. After a 115-day long siege, due to heavy losses in troops and morale, the Ottoman army ultimately retreated to the sea. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|August 1566 | |||
|2,300 Croats and Hungarians | |||
|90,000 Turks | |||
|1:39 | |||
|All but seven defenders under the leadership of Croatian ban Nikola Šubić Zrinski were killed, while the Ottoman Turks suffered up to 25,000 killed.{{Fact|date=March 2007}} | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|13 Korean ] battleships | |||
|333 Japanese fleet | |||
|1:25 | |||
|During the ], Korean admiral ] held the strait from a fleet of 133 Japanese warships and at least 200 Japanese logistical support ships. Many Japanese warships were sunk or disabled during the battle and the Japanese were forced to retreat. Given the disparity in numbers, the battle is regarded as one of Admiral Yi's most remarkable victories. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|1660 | |||
|150 Marathas under ] | |||
|Bijapuri Army (15,000+) | |||
|1:100 | |||
|] defended Pavan Khind, a small pass and huge cliffs between ] and ], with 150 men against the Bijapur army for more than 14 hours, allowing ] to escape to a safer place. | |||
|} | |||
The historian ] suggests that although the majority of last stands throughout history have seen the defending force overwhelmed, on rare occasions the outnumbered defenders succeed in their desperate endeavours and live to fight another day, and he lists the ] and the ] as such engagements.<ref>Bryan Perrett. ''Last Stand!: Famous Battles Against the Odds''. p. 9</ref> | |||
== 1700 - 1870 == | |||
{| style="border:1px solid #A3B1BF; text-align:left; background:#f5faff" | |||
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | |||
| width="15%" style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Name''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Date''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Defending army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Attacking army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Ratio''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Details''' | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|5,400 Jacobites | |||
|9,000 British troops | |||
|roughly 1:2 | |||
|The last battle between the Jacobite forces commanded by Prince ] (aka "Bonnie Prince Charlie") and the forces of ] ended the Rising of the '45. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|30,000 Mysore troops | |||
|60,000 British troops | |||
|roughly 1:2 | |||
|Tipu Sultan was betrayed in this war by one of his commanders, Mir Sadiq, a traitor who was bought by the British. Tippu Sultan died defending his capital on ]. The Kingdom of Mysore became a princely state of British India. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|May 2 1808 | |||
|37 Spanish soldiers | |||
|Hundreds of French soldiers | |||
|? | |||
|Pedro Velarde y Santillán led the defence of the artillery barracks in Madrid during the spontaneous popular uprising against Napoleon. Hundreds were killed, among them Velarde and nearly all of his troops. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|23 February - ] ] | |||
|185 defenders | |||
|1800 - 2000 Mexican troops <ref>Bryan Perrett, ''Last Stand: Famous Battles Against the Odds''. London: Arms and Armour, 1993; pp. 26-37.</ref> | |||
|1:11 | |||
|The Battle of the Alamo during the ] was the first and last stand for the volunteers from Coahuila y Tejas. The garrison commander, South Carolinan attorney Willian Barret Travis, meant to delay Santa Ana's invasion on the north shore of the Rio Brazos, buying time for Sam Houston to build up his army. The garrison held out for 12 days. On the 13th day, every defender died in a surprise, pre-dawn attack. Overall casualties for the Mexicans numbered around 600 dead. Over 200 Mexicans were killed outright, and another 400 or more died of their wounds in the ensuing weeks. The battle was a Pyrrhic victory for Santa Ana, who could ill-afford to lose a third of his fighting force to such a small collection of volunteers. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|470 Voortrekkers defenders | |||
|10,000-20,000 Zulu attackers | |||
|1:21 to 1:43 | |||
|470 Boer ] successfully defended an impromptu ] of wagons against 10,000 ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|80 British Soldiers | |||
|4000+ Afghan Tribesmen | |||
| | |||
|The remains of a British and East India Company army retreating through the Khyber Pass made a desperate last stand against Afghan tribesmen who had been sniping and charging them for weeks in the thick of an Afghan winter. Having dwindled from a force of around 14,000 men, the survivors, consisting mainly of officers and men from the 44th East Essex Regiment and officers of the Bengal Artillery, formed a rough square formation on the top of a rocky snow-clad hilltop near the village of Gandamack and fought to the last. Only a handful of wounded were taken prisoner. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|] - Six Mexican cadets fought to the last man, after ] ordered them to fall back during the ]; one of the last events of the ] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|65 Legionnaires | |||
|800 Mexican cavalry and 1200 infantry | |||
|1:12 | |||
|The ]'s stand at ], ]. Capt. Jean Danjou and his company of men, with pack mules carrying supplies, were caught in the open by Mexican cavalry while attempting to locate and reinforce the French relief column from Veracruz. They formed square and fought their way under attack to the hacienda of Camerone, where they continued fighting until only three were left. The survivors surrendered to the Mexicans, on the terms that they keep their weapons and receive safe conduct to their own lines. The Mexicans honored their word. The battle established the reputation of the Legion as an elite corps.<ref>Bryan Perrett, ''Last Stand: Famous Battles Against the Odds''. London: Arms and Armour, 1993; pp. 38-47.</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|May 23-July 9 1863 | |||
|4,652-6,800 Confederate troops | |||
|30,000-40,000 Union troops | |||
|1:6 | |||
|Major General ] defended the last Confederate bastion on the ] against two major attacks by the ], commanded by Major General ] and a Union flotilla led by Admiral ]. It was the longest siege in US military history, with the highest casualty rate suffered by Union Army during the Civil War. The Union flotilla was severely damaged, making it the worst defeat suffered by Farragut during the war. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|10,000-20,000 Confederate troops | |||
|30,000-60,000 Union troops | |||
|1:3 | |||
|The division of Confederate Major General ] held the pass of ] Gap in Northwest ] to cover the retreat of the ] ] against the entire ] corps of ] of the ]. Cleburne's division took approximately the same number of casualties as their enemy, while outnumbered 3:1. Just two days before, the same division had successfully held Tunnel Hill, the north end of ], against the four divisions of Major General ]'s corps on the third day of the ]. The center of the line two miles (3 km) south, under the direct command of Gen. ], collapsed under assault by the troops of ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|6,000 mostly children | |||
|20,000+ Brazilian troops | |||
|1:3 | |||
|During the Triple Alliance War, while retreating from Asuncion, a Paraguayan army consisting mostly of children held back a Brazilian regiment, until being massacred. | |||
|} | |||
===Fear of execution=== | |||
== 1870 - 1930 == | |||
Troops may fight a last stand if they believe that they will be executed if they surrender. | |||
{| style="border:1px solid #A3B1BF; text-align:left; background:#f5faff" | |||
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | |||
| width="15%" style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Name''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Date''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Defending army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Attacking army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Ratio''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Details''' | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|208 US Cavalry under Custer | |||
|1800 Lakota, Cheyenne, and Arapahoe | |||
|roughly 1:9 | |||
|]'s famous "Last stand". The Federal cavalry officer and hero of Gettysburg refused an extra battalion of men from General Terry and left a battery of Gatling guns at the Steamboat ''Far West'' on the Yellowstone River, knowing he was facing superior odds. Four days later he stumbled upon a very large encampment, 3.5-5 miles long on the west side of the Little Bighorn. His Crow scouts rode off at that point. Custer then divided his forces in a three-way pincers move. The defenders beat back the initial attacks, forced Custer's supporting columns under Reno and Benteen into a defensive position, and pursued Custer and his men up onto a long, open ridge. The entire force with Custer died. Reno and Benteen's men, dug in over three miles (5 km) away, survived a three-day siege until relieved by General Terry. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|5000 Russian soldiers and Bulgarian ] | |||
|30,000 Turkish soldiers | |||
|1:6 | |||
|5000 Russian soldiers and Bulgarian ] led by General Darozhinsky repelled 30,000 troops commanded by ] at the Battle of Shipka Pass. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|300-400 samurai under Satsuma | |||
|300,000 troops of the Imperial Japanese Army | |||
|1:750 to 1:1000 | |||
|300 ] faced 300,000 troops of the ] at the Battle of Shiroyama. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|1,400 British soldiers | |||
|22,000 Zulu troops | |||
|1:16 | |||
|A British force of 1,400 men was overwhelmed by a 22,000 strong ] army at the Battle of Isandlwana and suffered over 1300 dead. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|139 British infantry | |||
|4,000-5,000 Zulu warriors | |||
|1:29 to 1:36 | |||
|150 British soldiers successfully defend the supply station at ] against 4,000 ] warriors. This engagement resulted in the largest number of ] ever awarded to a regiment in a single battle. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|In the last battle of the ], 100 Serrano riflemen stood against 1200 Federal troops for seven days in the Tomochic forest and finally in the town itself. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] – ] ] | |||
|34 British South Africa Police | |||
|3,000 Matabele warriors | |||
|1:88 | |||
|The Shangani Patrol was a group of white ] settlers killed in battle on the Shangani River in ]. The incident achieved a lasting, prominent place in Rhodesian colonial history as part of the mythology of white conquest. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|21 ]s | |||
|10,000 ] and ] troops | |||
|1:476 | |||
|The ] was fought between 21 Sikhs of the 4th Battalion (then 36th Sikhs) of the ] of Great British ], defending an army post, against 10,000 Afghans and Orakzai tribesmen. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|July 1, 1898 | |||
|800 Spanish | |||
|15,000 Americans, 4,000 Cubans | |||
|1:24 | |||
|The Americans suffered almost three times as many losses compared to the Spaniards. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|July 1, 1898 | |||
|500 Spanish | |||
|8,500 Americans, 1,000 Cubans | |||
|1:19 | |||
|The Spanish army held off the more heavily-armed Americans for 12 hours while waiting in vain for reinforcements. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|50 Spaniards | |||
|Between 300 and 2,000 Filipinos grossing as the siege advanced | |||
|1:6 to 1:40 | |||
|Fifty Spanish soldiers and four officers defended this site, surrounded for a whole year, not knowing that the Filipino-Spanish war was over. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
| October 1899 - May 1900 | |||
|2000 UK Combatants | |||
|8000 Boer Combatants | |||
|1:4 | |||
|The ] was the most famous British action in the Second Boer War. It took place at the town of Mafeking (now Mafikeng) in South Africa over a period of 217 days, from October 1899 to May 1900, and turned ], who went on to found the ] movement, into a national hero. The lifting of the Siege of Mafeking was a decisive victory for the British and a crushing defeat for the Boers. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|60 Filipino troops | |||
|500 American soldiers | |||
|1:8 | |||
|The stand of 60 Filipino soldiers under General ] covered the retreat of ] ] during the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] 1915 | |||
| ] | |||
|Coalition Armies | |||
| | |||
|The Gallipoli campaign took place between April and December 1915 in an effort to take the Dardanelles from the Turkish Ottoman Empire (an ally of Germany and Austria) and thus force it out of the war. Some 60,000 Australians and 18,000 New Zealanders were part of a larger British force. Some 26,000 Australians and 7,571 New Zealanders were wounded; and 7,594 Australians and 2,431 New Zealanders were killed. In numerical terms, Gallipoli was a minor campaign, but it took on considerable national and personal importance to the Australians and New Zealanders who fought there. Bouvet and Irresistible are sunk together with coalition dreams to get Istanbul. | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|35,000 ]n troops (1 Division) | |||
|at least 75,000 ] and ] troops (6 Divisions) | |||
|1:2,5-3 | |||
|The stand of the Bulgarian 9th Infantry Division on the fortified position around Doiran under General ] against superior Allied forces. The Bulgarians inflicted 59,000 casualties on the enemy while losing 494 soldiers. The Bulgarian victory saved the country from an Allied occupation. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|2 – ] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|An American battalion under Major ] held out in the Argonne Forrest. | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|]] | |||
|330 mostly ill-equipped ] irregulars | |||
|] ] | |||
| | |||
|The result is a Russian tactical victory, but a Polish strategic victory. The Polish force, although inflicting heavy losses, was almost completely annihilated. Their stand did manage to halt the Soviet advance and prevent the Bolsheviks from seizing Lwów, effectively buying time for the Polish defense of Warsaw. | |||
|} | |||
In ], at the end of the battle, the extent of the soldiers' resistance to the Lakota and Cheyenne warriors indicated they had few doubts about their prospects for survival if they surrendered. In the end, the hilltop where ]'s remaining troops made their last stand made it impossible for Custer's men to secure a defensive position. Nevertheless, the soldiers put up their most dogged defence, and died fighting. | |||
== 1930 - 1945 == | |||
{| style="border:1px solid #A3B1BF; text-align:left; background:#f5faff" | |||
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | |||
| width="15%" style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Name''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Date''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Defending army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Attacking army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Ratio''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Details''' | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|414 Chinese | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|414 Chinese soldiers defended the Sihang Warehouse against Japanese forces. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|182 Polish soldiers 25 civilians | |||
|3,500 German soldiers plus | |||
47-70 Stuka dive bombers | |||
|1:18 | |||
|The Polish garrison held out for a week against the German invaders. The exact number of German losses remains unknown or undisclosed, but are estimated to be in the range of several hundred. Polish casualties were much lower - 15 killed and 53 wounded. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|]] | |||
|57 Polish militiamen | |||
|Unknown German forces | |||
|Unknown | |||
| | |||
The Polish garrison of the post office held out against the German assault, while under heavy bombardment, from 0445 to 1800 hours, refusing a call at 1500 hours to surrender. Only six defenders were killed in action; however, after surrender, all but four of them were executed as ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|720 Polish soldiers | |||
6 artillery guns, 42 ] | |||
|42,200 German soldiers | |||
350 tanks, considerable artillery and aircraft support | |||
|1:58 | |||
|The Polish defense line held for three days, halting and hindering the German offensive in the area. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] – ] ] | |||
|11,000 Finnish soldiers | |||
|45,000-50,000 Soviet soldiers | |||
|Roughly 1:4 | |||
|The Battle of Suomussalmi was a battle in the Winter War conflict. In this one-month battle the vastly superior Soviet forces lost against the light Finnish ski troops. In this battle the ] tactic was used successfully. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|]– ], ] | |||
|14,000 British, Indian, Australian, Czech and Polish soldiers | |||
|35,000 Germans and Italian soldiers | |||
|2:5 | |||
|The longest siege in British history, it proved the ] vulnerability against ]s, entrenched ] and ] fire. A total of three attempts were made to relieve the siege. Despite the numerical and armory advantage of the ], the defenders were able to hold due to the naval superiority of the ]; not only supplies, but the ] and the ] were able to replace the ] and a brigade of ]. The siege also saw a number of ] and ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|], ]-], ] | |||
|449 Marines, 68 US Navy personnel and 1221 civilian construction workers | |||
|2500 Japanese infantry, supporting air and naval forces.<ref>Perrett, Bryan. Last Stand: Famous Battles Against the Odds. London: Arms & Armour, 1993.</ref> | |||
|1:6 | |||
|After a 16-day siege, several unsuccessful landing attempts, the loss of two destroyers and nearly 30 aircraft, and extensive damage to its landing fleet, the Japanese succeeded in getting USMC Maj. Devereux to surrender "honorably". The Japanese lost an estimated 900 dead and over 1100 wounded. 49 US Marines, 3 naval personnel, and 70 civilian workers died. Most of the American survivors either died as POWs or were murdered by the Japanese after the surrender, for bringing disgrace on his Imperial Majesty's forces. 98 Americans were kept on the island as slave labor, but were eventually machine-gunned en masse in October 1943. One survivor who escaped the massacre scratched a monument to the dead on a coral rock reading: 98 US PW 5-10-43. He was later recaptured and personally beheaded by Admiral Sakaibara. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|October 1941 - January 1942 | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|Defense of the ] 316th Rifle Division under command of General ] at ] near ] during the Battle of Moscow. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|Defence of ] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|3,500-4,000 Soviet soldiers | |||
|30,000-40,000 German soldiers | |||
|roughly 1:10 | |||
|The defenders were cut off from the outside world and ran out of food, water and ammunition, but still fought and counter-attacked to the very end. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|~200 Slovenian partisans | |||
|~2000 Wehrmacht troops with supporting artillery | |||
|1:10 | |||
|In the first confrontation between Slovenian partisans and occupying German forces, the village of Dražgoše was razed to the ground following three days of ferocious fighting in which nine partisans and more than 100 German soldiers were killed. Following the partisan retreat, Germans rounded up the locals, executed adult males and older boys on-site, and interned the rest of the population in concentration camps. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|1,400 Malay, British, Indian and Australian soldiers | |||
|13,000 Japanese troops | |||
|1:9 | |||
|Soldiers from the ], ], the British 2nd Loyals Regiment, the 44th Indian Brigade and the 22nd Australian Brigade made a futile attempt to stop the advancing Japanese towards the centre of ]. In the final hours of battle, a Malay soldier, 2nd Lieutenant ], led a 42-man platoon against thousands of invaders, leaving a sole survivor. The Japanese suffered a disproportionately high number of casualties, and tortured Adnan before executing him. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|13,000 American and Filipino soldiers | |||
|75,000 Japanese troops | |||
|1:6 | |||
|The ] fell under the advance of the ]'s ] at the Battle of Corregidor. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] – ] ] | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|]ese defence of the Papuan beachheads at the Battle of Buna-Gona. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|May – ] ] | |||
|1,260 Japanese Troops | |||
|50,000 Chinese (Nationalist) Troops | |||
|1:40 | |||
|One Japanese regiment fought five Chinese divisions in South China, near Burma. Three Japanese soldiers were ordered by Major Kanemitsu, the officer commanding, to report to headquarters after their position fell and became the only survivors. There was no air cover or supply. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] – | |||
|] 1944| | |||
|9000 paratroopers, 1st British Airborne Division | |||
|2 German Panzer divisions. | |||
|1:4+ | |||
|The 1st British Airborne Division was charged with securing and holding the bridge--the final bridgehead leading into Germany--against anticipated light opposition until Field Marshal Montgomery's heavy armoured divisions could arrive to relieve them. Allied aerial reconnaissance never identified the two understrength German Panzer divisions resting in the area and Montgomery's troops never got there. Once the Paratroopers had seized the bridge, the Germans counterattacked in force, eventually forcing the bridge, and fighting it out with Britain's crack parachutists in three brutal days of house-to-house fighting while suffering heavy casualties themselves. In the end, about 1000 were evacuated, with the rest of the survivors wounded or captured. The 1st British Airborne suffered 90% casualties. | |||
|- | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|]. | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|1,400 Japanese Troops | |||
|15,000 American Troops | |||
|1:10 | |||
|The Japanese defense of Angaur. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ]-] ] | |||
|about 12,000 US Paratroopers | |||
|Roughly 15 Divisions of Germans | |||
|2:25 | |||
|Under their impetuous commander, ] the vastly outnumbered, underequipped, and exhausted ] seized the town of ] early in the ] to defend this strategic crossroads from the German Advance. Completely surrounded by the Germans on ], the 101st could only be sustained by airdrops from ]s. When the German commander, ] asked the 101st's acting commander, ] to surrender, McAuliffe's famously terse reply was "Nuts!". Nonetheless, the unit held off a German Panzer division, until eventually relieved by ]'s ] on ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|]. | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|22,000 Japanese Troops | |||
|110,000 American Troops | |||
|1:5 | |||
|The Japanese defended Iwo Jima against a combined land, sea, and air assault by the United States. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|766,750 German Soldiers | |||
|2,500,000 Soviet soldiers | |||
|1:3 | |||
|Last stand of the ] army against ] forces in the German capital. | |||
|} | |||
During the ], by the end of 1942, the Jews trapped in the ] learned that the deportations were part of an ], as the deportees were sent to ]. Many of the remaining Jews decided to revolt.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005188 | title=Warsaw Ghetto Uprising | publisher=United States Holocaust Memorial Museum | access-date=18 May 2014 | archive-date=19 January 2012 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120119021035/http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005188 | url-status=live }}</ref> The first armed resistance in the ghetto occurred in January 1943.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/warsaw_ghetto_testimonies/resistance.asp?WT.mc_id=wiki|title=January 1943: The First Armed Resistance in the Ghetto - Holocaust Survivors Describe the Last Months in the Warsaw Ghetto – Voices from the Inferno - Yad Vashem|website=www.yadvashem.org|access-date=2017-05-13|archive-date=2019-04-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190401015208/https://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/warsaw_ghetto_testimonies/resistance.asp?WT.mc_id=wiki|url-status=live}}</ref> On 19 April 1943, Passover eve, the Nazis entered the ghetto. The remaining Jews knew that the Nazis would murder them all and they decided to resist the Nazis to the last, rather than surrender.<ref name="yadvashem.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/warsaw_ghetto_testimonies/fighters.asp?WT.mc_id=wiki|title=Fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto - Holocaust Survivors Describe the Last Months in the Warsaw Ghetto – Voices from the Inferno - Yad Vashem|website=www.yadvashem.org|access-date=2017-05-13|archive-date=2019-04-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190401030742/https://www.yadvashem.org/yv/en/exhibitions/warsaw_ghetto_testimonies/fighters.asp?WT.mc_id=wiki|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
== 1946 - Current Day == | |||
{| style="border:1px solid #A3B1BF; text-align:left; background:#f5faff" | |||
|-<!--COLUMN HEADINGS--> | |||
| width="15%" style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Name''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Date''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Defending army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Attacking army''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Ratio''' | |||
| style="background: #cee0f2; padding: 0.3em; text-align:center;"|'''Details''' | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|25 police and auxiliary police personnel | |||
|200 Communists | |||
|1:8 | |||
|A police station near ], ] was besieged by Communist guerrillas. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] – ], ] | |||
|About 30,000 U.S. and British soldiers | |||
|60,000 Chinese. | |||
|Roughly 1:2 | |||
|UN forces were surrounded by China's People's Liberation Army units. USMC ] had planned for the contingency, and ordered a fighting retreat by the US' 1st Marine Division. It cut his way out, bringing out all his dead and wounded, and leaving the remnants of 4 shattered Chinese divisions in his path. In contrast, the Army's ] failed to break out. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|750 British soldiers | |||
|Approx. 70,000 Chinese soldiers | |||
|1:94 | |||
|The last stand of the ] at Gloster Hill cost the Chinese over 10,000 dead and resulted in the 63rd Army being removed from the line. Out of 750 men of the 1st Battalion, Gloucestershire Regiment, only 160 mustered for roll-call after the battle. The Glosters won between them 2 Victoria Crosses, 1 George Cross, 3 Distinguished Service Orders and 3 Military Crosses. Out of the British 29th Brigade, over 1000 men were killed or captured by the Chinese. | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|5 Companies between 500 and 700 Greek and US troops of the ] | |||
|13-15,000 Chinese troops | |||
|1:26 | |||
|Outpost Harry was a strategic "military Hot Spot" and dearly desired by the Chinese. If the UN forces lost the outpost, the ] would have had to withdraw approximately 6 miles (10 km) to the next defensible line. Furthermore, a Chinese victory at Outpost Harry may have whet the appetite for more war and disheartened the American public to a point where it might have accepted an armistice term less favorable than was eventually was the case. The United Nations held the position and it was the last battle of the ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ] ] | |||
|10,800 French | |||
|63,000 Vietnamese | |||
|1:5 | |||
|The final battle of the ] pitted ] forces against ] forces under General ]. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] ] | |||
|123 Indian soldiers from ] of ] | |||
|Approx. 7000 Chinese soldiers | |||
|1:57 | |||
|The 13th Battalion, ] led by ] at Rezang La ('']''). Of the 123 Indian soldiers, 109 died. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|Landing Zone (LZ) X-Ray in the ] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|1000 American Soldiers | |||
|] (Peoples' Army of Vietnam, North Vietnamese Army) (4000) | |||
|1:4 | |||
|The 1st Battalion/], the 2nd Battalion/7th Cavalry, and the 1st Battalion/] at the Battle of Ia Drang. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|Australian Army (108) | |||
|North Vietnamese Army, Viet Cong (1,500-2,650) | |||
|1:15 | |||
|The Battle of Long Tần is arguably the most famous battle fought by the Australian Army during the Vietnam War. It was fought in a rubber plantation near the village of Long Tần, about 4 km north-east of Vung Tau, South Vietnam on August 18–19, 1966. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|1 Indian Company (120) | |||
|1 Pakistani Armoured Brigade (3,000) | |||
|1:20 | |||
|The Indian 'A' company of 120 odd soldiers of the 23rd Battalion, Punjab Regiment, managed to hold a 2,000-3,000 strong assault force of the 51st Infantry Brigade of the Pakistani Army, backed by the 22nd Armoured Regiment, before the Indian Air Force flew in. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
| 6,000 Marines, 350 tactical fighter-bombers, 60 B-52s, 30 reconnaissance aircraft, 40,000 tons of bombs | |||
| 20,000 North Vietnamese | |||
| roughly 1:3 | |||
| 6,000 U.S. forces, primarily Marines backed up by 350 tactical fighters and 60 B-52s, successfully defended this base against 20,000 North Vietnamese forces. Roughly 40,000 tons of bombs were dropped in around 12000 sorties. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|Last Stand of Recon Team Kansas | |||
|] ] | |||
|6 US Special Forces, 8 ] tribesmen | |||
|1500 North Vietnamese | |||
|roughly 1:107 | |||
|Recon Team Kansas lost 3 US Special Forces members and 6 Mantagnards during an ambush by NVA | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|]-], ] | |||
|6000 ], ] soldiers, and ] bombers | |||
|35000 ] and ] soldiers | |||
|roughly 1:6 | |||
|As a part of the Easter Offensive, the ] and ] (Viet Cong) sought to seize the city of An Loc for its strategic position between ] and ]<ref></ref>. Facing a combined 6 ] and ] divisions totaling 35000+ soldiers with only one division at its disposal, the ] resisted aggressively to a much larger enemy. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] ] | |||
|The ] defending the southern ] during the ]. | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|April 1975 | |||
|6,000 ARVN soldiers | |||
|40,000 North Vietnamese | |||
|1:7 | |||
|During last major battle of the ], the ], the vastly outnumbered ] stood and fought at Xuan Loc. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|39 Soviet paratroopers | |||
|well-armed force of 200-400 Mujahideen | |||
|roughly 1:5 - 1:10 | |||
|Battle for Hill 3234 was a defensive battle fought by the Soviet paratroopers in Afghanistan in 1988 against the much larger Afghan rebel force.Shortly after landing on Hill 3234, the 39-man unit came under attack by a coordinated and well-armed force of 200-400 Mujahideen. The first attack came at 15:30 on ] and was followed by 11 more attacks until just before dawn on ] when the Mujahideen withdrew leaving Hill 3234 in the hands of the Soviet paratroopers. Ironically, the exhausted and mostly wounded Soviets were nearly out of ammunition after the final attack and may not have been able to withstand a 13th assault. | |||
The Soviet forces sustained 37 casualties (out of a force of 39 men), including 9 men killed and 28 injured. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] and ], ] | |||
|2,000 ] | |||
|36,000 Mixture of various Serb forces | |||
|1:18 | |||
|Only one brigade of Croatian soldiers clashed with the ] army, then the fourth biggest army in Europe. JNA troops, consisting of mostly Serbian soldiers, completely enclosed the city. Most Croatian soldiers were killed (about 2,000) while the other side suffered enormous losses (about 10,000). Up to this date, there has been no official confirmation of the latter{{Fact|date=September 2007}}. The city was completely obliterated by 700,000 different projectiles (during only 3 months of the battle), and occupied until 1998. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] and 4, 1993 | |||
|160 ] and ] | |||
|2,000+ ] - affiliated militias | |||
|1:13 | |||
|US soldiers from the ] and the ] went into hostile territory, but two ]s were shot down and the US soldiers ended up besieged in the city with support form ]. They were contact with ] force later at night and evacuated from the city in the morning. Two Delta Force troopers, ] ] and ] ] were awarded ] for volunteering to secure the second crash site. | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|] – ], ] | |||
|85 ] | |||
|~2,000 Chechen ]{{Fact|date=October 2007}} | |||
|~1:24 | |||
|During one of the last major battles of the ], a vastly outnumbered company of Russian airborne troops stood and fought against an assault by Chechen rebels on Hill 776 near Ulus-Kert in the ]. All but one of the 85 Russians died - 400 rebels were killed.{{Fact|date=October 2007}} | |||
|- | |||
|colspan="6" style="border-top:1px solid #cee0f2;"| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|], ] | |||
|4 ] | |||
|~150 ] | |||
|~Roughly 1:38 | |||
|US Navy Seals from Seal Team 10, attempted to hold off 150 Taliban insurgents. All but one of the 4 Navy Seals died, an estimated 35 Taliban insurgents died. Additionally, 8 Navy Seals and 8 Army Nightstalkers were killed in a helicopter. | |||
|} | |||
{{Expand list|date=August 2008}} | |||
] ] (left) and ] ] (right)]] | |||
== See also == | |||
Another example of a famous last stand was during the ], where two US ] snipers, ] ] and ] ], protected the crash site of helicopter "Super 6-4" and injured pilot ], whom they feared would be executed by a crowd of deadly rioters. The two snipers killed 25 and wounded dozens more before they ran out of ammunition and were killed. Their defense, however, allowed Mike Durant to survive long enough for one of the local warlords to take him prisoner. The US was ultimately able to arrange for his release and he was returned home. For their actions, MSG Gordon and SFC Shughart were ] awarded the ]. | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
===Fear of mistreatment=== | |||
== References== | |||
People may fight to the death due to the belief that if they surrender they will be tortured or enslaved. At the ], the inhabitants refused to surrender to the Romans because they were unwilling to become slaves. ] were told by their superiors that they would be tortured if captured. | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
===Protecting leader=== | |||
] | |||
In some cases, troops will make a last stand to protect their ruler or leader or commander. | |||
In the ] in 1066, ] battled the Norman ], who invaded with 7,000 men. After most of the English were killed in the battle, "Harold and his ] bodyguard...fought on until an arrow struck the king in the eye." After Harold died, the housecarl bodyguard made a last stand and "...fought to the death around the body of their dead king."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://listverse.com/2009/08/28/10-heroic-last-stands-from-military-history/|title=10 Heroic Last Stands from Military History - Listverse|date=28 August 2009|website=listverse.com|access-date=30 December 2015|archive-date=27 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181027174351/http://listverse.com/2009/08/28/10-heroic-last-stands-from-military-history/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
When ] by the army of the Holy Roman Empire under ], over 20,000 troops stormed the city. The 189 ]s made a last stand against the massive army by forming a square around ] to give ] time to escape through ]s, and held the doors until Clement could escape. | |||
At the 1795 ], where the Persian army led by ] defeated the ], the ] – a detachment of the highlanders from the ] – loyally fought and died in order to enable the escape of King ], for which they are remembered as national heroes and were canonized by the Georgian Church. | |||
The ] involved a rearguard last stand. It took place on July 13, 1660, at a mountain pass in the vicinity of fort Vishalgad, near the city of Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India between the ] warrior ] and Siddi Masud of ]. 300 Marathas in a rearguard action, held off an attacking force of 10,000 Bijapuris, allowing their king ] to escape to a nearby fort. Ultimately the battle ended with the destruction of the rearguard Maratha forces, and a tactical victory for the Adil Shahi Sultanate, but failed to achieve its strategic objective of capturing the Maratha king Shivaji. | |||
The ] occurred in 1704 when the tenth ], ], and a small force of 40 ], was attacked by a much larger force of ] soldiers at ] for his refusal to convert to ]. The forty Sikhs fought to their death, allowing enough time for the Guru to escape the fort and live another day.<ref name=fenechmcleod218>{{cite book|author1=Louis E. Fenech|author2=W. H. McLeod|title=Historical Dictionary of Sikhism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xajcAwAAQBAJ|year=2014|publisher=Rowman & Littlefield|isbn=978-1-4422-3601-1|pages=218|access-date=2020-12-04|archive-date=2023-08-17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230817161136/https://books.google.com/books?id=xajcAwAAQBAJ|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Defending tactically crucial point=== | |||
During the ] the Greeks hoped to use the narrow pass of ] to prevent the vastly large army of the Persians from outflanking them. A Greek force of 7,000 men marched north to block the pass in the middle of 480 BC. The Persian army, ranging between about 100,000 and 150,000,<ref>{{cite book|last=Sacks|first=Kenneth|title=Understanding Emerson: "The American scholar" and his struggle for self-reliance |year=2003|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-09982-8|url=https://archive.org/details/understandingeme0000sack|url-access=registration|page=}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Cassin-Scott|first=Jack|title=The Greek and Persian Wars 500-323 B.C.|year=1977|publisher=Osprey|isbn=978-0-85045-271-6|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=geWUfjew_PEC&pg=PA11|page=11}}{{Dead link|date=August 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> arrived at the pass in late August or early September. During the ], the vastly outnumbered Greeks held off the Persians for seven days (including three of battle) before the rear-guard was annihilated in one of history's most famous last stands. During two full days of battle, the small force led by Leonidas blocked the only road by which the massive Persian army could pass. When Leonidas became aware that his force was being outflanked, he dismissed the bulk of the Greek army and remained to guard their retreat with 300 ], 700 ], 400 ], fighting to the death. Although the Greeks lost the battle, it did check the advance of the Persian army and the delay helped the Greeks prepare a successful defence and ultimately win the war.<ref>{{cite book |last=Cummins |first=Joseph |year=2011 |title=History's Greatest Wars: The Epic Conflicts that Shaped the Modern World|publisher=Fair Winds Press|isbn=978-1-59233-471-1|page=}}</ref> | |||
An ], with reversed roles, would be fought 150 years later, during the ] by ]: Persians, led by ], tried desperately to stop the ] offensive towards the capital city ], blocking the ] pass.<ref name="Robinson1929">{{cite book |last=Robinson |first=Cyril Edward |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.183571 |title=A History of Greece |publisher=Methuen & Company Limited |year=1929 |access-date=7 April 2013}}</ref> | |||
A similar action to Thermopylae occurred in April 1951 at the ] when strategic Hill 677 was held by the 700 men of the Canadian 2 PPCLI against two attacking Chinese PVA divisions, encircled and outnumbered by more than 10 to 1 in the immediate battle area, and by about 30 to 1 on the larger battlefield. The PPCLI were exhausted of ammunition and supplies, but the commander Lt. Col. ] ordered "no retreat, no surrender", and called in artillery fire on his own positions when they were overrun. The PVA divisions eventually withdrew with about 5,000 dead and a large number wounded. | |||
===Buying time=== | |||
Sometimes, rather than face annihilation at the hands of a pursuing victorious army, a rearguard will be tasked by the commander of the defeated army with hindering the advance of the victorious army. Even if the rearguard is destroyed in a last stand, its sacrifice may buy their commander time to disengage without losing the majority of his army as happened during the ] (778), ] (1899), the ] (1947) which proved to be critical to preventing the fall of Srinagar to tribal lashkars.<ref name="Slender">{{cite book |title=Slender Was the Thread: Kashmir Confrontation 1947-48 |last=Sen |first=Maj Gen L. P. |year=1969 |publisher=Orient Longman |location=New Delhi |isbn=0-86131-692-4 |pages=308 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PkDRAAAAMAAJ |access-date=16 August 2021 |archive-date=17 August 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230817161138/https://books.google.com/books?id=PkDRAAAAMAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Perceived duty=== | |||
A last stand may also be the last ] of a war where the position of the defending force is hopeless but the defending force considers it their duty not to surrender until forced to do so, as happened to the last Royalist field army of the ] at the ] in 1646.<ref>], ''et al.'', ''The dictionary of English history'', Cassell and company, 1928. "At the battle of Naseby ] commanded the infantry, and in 1646 he made a last stand at Stow-on-the-Wold against the Parliament."</ref> | |||
At the ] in 1897, the British Indian contingent consisting of 21 Sikh soldiers of the ], when faced with insurmountable opposition of 10,000 Afghans, decided to make a last stand in accordance with their traditional and religious belief that duty is above all convictions. All 21 Sikhs were killed, together with approximately 600 Afghans.<ref name="bbcn">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-16027179|publisher=bbc.co.uk|work=British Broadcasting Corporation|title=India polo match honours Sikhs' 1897 Saragarhi battle|author=Pandey, Geeta|date=5 December 2011|access-date=19 July 2012|archive-date=7 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190507113438/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-16027179|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
During the ], the Imperial Japanese Navy battleship '']'' sailed from the Japanese home islands to ], in which she would have been hopelessly outgunned. As a last ditch effort she would have beached herself on the shore, her crew joining the troops on the island and using her as a stationary gun battery. ''Yamato'' was sunk on her approach with the loss of some 3,055 crew of her complement of 3,332 after coming under attack from a large strike force of carrier borne aircraft. Given the tactical situation, one battleship accompanied by several smaller vessels with no air support against a fleet of aircraft carriers, the outcome was predictable to military leaders, and ultimately one born out of shame at being questioned by the Emperor over their lack of contribution to the ongoing defensive war effort when the Japanese Army was slowly being annihilated and while air crews were performing suicidal kamikaze missions.<ref name=cfrecord>{{Cite web | url = http://combinedfleet.com/yamato.htm | title = Combined Fleet – tabular history of ''Yamato'' | access-date = 1 April 2010 | publisher = Parshall, Jon; Bob Hackett, Sander Kingsepp, & Allyn Nevitt | year = 2009 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20101129040009/http://www.combinedfleet.com/yamato.htm | archive-date = 29 November 2010 | url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
==At the end of a siege== | |||
Before the 20th century, "]" if a besieged garrison had refused any offered terms of surrender prior to the attackers breaching the defences, so a last stand was part of the end of many sieges, such as the ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Gunderson |first=Cory Gideon |year=2004 |title=The battle of the Alamo |publisher=ABDO |isbn=1-59197-278-7 |page=}}</ref> | |||
However, since the 1907 ] it is unlawful for an attacking force to kill a garrison if they attempt to surrender, even if it is during the final assault on a fortified position. It is also forbidden to declare that "no quarter will be given".<ref>]. ''The Laws and Customs of War on Land'' October 18, 1907. {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110703002254/http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague04.asp#art23 |date=2011-07-03 }}</ref> | |||
==Historical significance== | |||
Last stands loom large in history due to the pull on popular imagination. Historian ] argues: | |||
{{blockquote|Long before Custer died at the Little Bighorn, the myth of the Last Stand already had a strong pull on human emotions, and on the way we like to remember history. The variations are endless — from the three hundred Spartans at ] to ] at the Alamo—but they all tell the story of a brave and intractable hero leading his tiny band against a numberless foe. Even though the odds are overwhelming, the hero and his followers fight on nobly to the end and are slaughtered to a man. In defeat the hero of the Last Stand achieves the greatest of victories, since he will be remembered for all time.<ref>Philbrick, Nathaniel. ''The Last Stand: Custer, Sitting Bull, and the Battle of the Little Bighorn.'' New York: Viking Books, 2010, p. xvii.</ref>}} | |||
During ], the expression to fight "with one's back to the wall" became a widely-known way to refer to making a last stand. The London ''Times'' reported on April 13, 1918, that General ] ordered British troops that "Every position must be held to the last man...With our backs to the wall...each one of us must fight on to the end".<ref>Ammer, Christine. ''The Fact on File Dictionary of Cliches''. Checkmark Books, 2001. p. 16</ref> | |||
==See also== | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==References== | |||
{{reflist}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Last Stand}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 08:53, 15 October 2024
Situation in which a military unit holds against overwhelming odds For other uses, see Last stand (disambiguation).A last stand is a military situation in which a body of troops holds a defensive position in the face of overwhelming and virtually insurmountable odds. Troops may make a last stand due to a sense of duty; because they are defending a tactically crucial point; to buy time to enable a trapped army, person, or group of people to escape; due to fear of execution if captured; or to protect their ruler or leader. Last stands loom large in history, as the heroism and sacrifice of the defenders exert a large pull on the public's imagination. Some last stands have become a celebrated part of a fighting force's or a country's history, especially if the defenders accomplished their goals (or, in rare cases, defeated their attackers).
Tactical significance
A "last stand" is a last resort tactic, and is chosen because the defending force realizes or believes the benefits of fighting outweigh the benefits of retreat or surrender. This usually arises from strategic or moral considerations, such as staying and fighting to buy time for wounded soldiers or civilians to get to a safe place, leading defenders to conclude that their sacrifice is essential to the greater success of their campaign or cause, as happened at the end of the Battle of Saragarhi. The situation can arise in several ways. One situation is that retreat by the defending force would lead to immediate defeat, usually due to the surrounding geography or shortage of supplies or support, as happened to the Royalist infantry on Wadborough Hill after the Battle of Naseby.
Some military thinkers have cautioned against putting an opposing force into a last stand situation, recognising that trapped men will fight harder. Sun Tzu wrote: "To a surrounded enemy, you must leave a way of escape". Similarly, they have sometimes suggested deliberately putting their own forces in such a situation, for example by burning boats or bridges that could tempt them to retreat.
The historian Bryan Perrett suggests that although the majority of last stands throughout history have seen the defending force overwhelmed, on rare occasions the outnumbered defenders succeed in their desperate endeavours and live to fight another day, and he lists the Battle of Agincourt and the Battle of Rorke's Drift as such engagements.
Fear of execution
Troops may fight a last stand if they believe that they will be executed if they surrender.
In Custer's last stand, at the end of the battle, the extent of the soldiers' resistance to the Lakota and Cheyenne warriors indicated they had few doubts about their prospects for survival if they surrendered. In the end, the hilltop where George Armstrong Custer's remaining troops made their last stand made it impossible for Custer's men to secure a defensive position. Nevertheless, the soldiers put up their most dogged defence, and died fighting.
During the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, by the end of 1942, the Jews trapped in the Warsaw Ghetto learned that the deportations were part of an extermination process, as the deportees were sent to death camps. Many of the remaining Jews decided to revolt. The first armed resistance in the ghetto occurred in January 1943. On 19 April 1943, Passover eve, the Nazis entered the ghetto. The remaining Jews knew that the Nazis would murder them all and they decided to resist the Nazis to the last, rather than surrender.
Another example of a famous last stand was during the First Battle of Mogadishu, where two US 1st SFOD-D snipers, MSG Gary Gordon and SFC Randy Shughart, protected the crash site of helicopter "Super 6-4" and injured pilot Mike Durant, whom they feared would be executed by a crowd of deadly rioters. The two snipers killed 25 and wounded dozens more before they ran out of ammunition and were killed. Their defense, however, allowed Mike Durant to survive long enough for one of the local warlords to take him prisoner. The US was ultimately able to arrange for his release and he was returned home. For their actions, MSG Gordon and SFC Shughart were posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor.
Fear of mistreatment
People may fight to the death due to the belief that if they surrender they will be tortured or enslaved. At the Siege of Numantia, the inhabitants refused to surrender to the Romans because they were unwilling to become slaves. Japanese soldiers in World War II were told by their superiors that they would be tortured if captured.
Protecting leader
In some cases, troops will make a last stand to protect their ruler or leader or commander. In the Battle of Hastings in 1066, King Harold II battled the Norman William the Conqueror, who invaded with 7,000 men. After most of the English were killed in the battle, "Harold and his housecarl bodyguard...fought on until an arrow struck the king in the eye." After Harold died, the housecarl bodyguard made a last stand and "...fought to the death around the body of their dead king."
When Rome was attacked in 1527 by the army of the Holy Roman Empire under Emperor Charles V, over 20,000 troops stormed the city. The 189 Swiss Guards made a last stand against the massive army by forming a square around St. Peter's Basilica to give Pope Clement VII time to escape through secret tunnels, and held the doors until Clement could escape.
At the 1795 battle of Krtsanisi, where the Persian army led by Agha Muhammad Khan defeated the Georgians, the Three Hundred Aragvians – a detachment of the highlanders from the Aragvi valley – loyally fought and died in order to enable the escape of King Heraclius II, for which they are remembered as national heroes and were canonized by the Georgian Church.
The Battle of Pavan Khind involved a rearguard last stand. It took place on July 13, 1660, at a mountain pass in the vicinity of fort Vishalgad, near the city of Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India between the Maratha warrior Baji Prabhu Deshpande and Siddi Masud of Adil Shahi dynasty. 300 Marathas in a rearguard action, held off an attacking force of 10,000 Bijapuris, allowing their king Shivaji to escape to a nearby fort. Ultimately the battle ended with the destruction of the rearguard Maratha forces, and a tactical victory for the Adil Shahi Sultanate, but failed to achieve its strategic objective of capturing the Maratha king Shivaji.
The Battle of Chamkaur occurred in 1704 when the tenth Sikh Guru, Guru Gobind Singh, and a small force of 40 Sikhs, was attacked by a much larger force of Mughal soldiers at his fort for his refusal to convert to Islam. The forty Sikhs fought to their death, allowing enough time for the Guru to escape the fort and live another day.
Defending tactically crucial point
During the second Persian invasion of Greece the Greeks hoped to use the narrow pass of Thermopylae to prevent the vastly large army of the Persians from outflanking them. A Greek force of 7,000 men marched north to block the pass in the middle of 480 BC. The Persian army, ranging between about 100,000 and 150,000, arrived at the pass in late August or early September. During the Battle of Thermopylae, the vastly outnumbered Greeks held off the Persians for seven days (including three of battle) before the rear-guard was annihilated in one of history's most famous last stands. During two full days of battle, the small force led by Leonidas blocked the only road by which the massive Persian army could pass. When Leonidas became aware that his force was being outflanked, he dismissed the bulk of the Greek army and remained to guard their retreat with 300 Spartans, 700 Thespians, 400 Thebans, fighting to the death. Although the Greeks lost the battle, it did check the advance of the Persian army and the delay helped the Greeks prepare a successful defence and ultimately win the war.
An analogous battle, with reversed roles, would be fought 150 years later, during the invasion of the Achaemenid Empire by Alexander the Great: Persians, led by Ariobarzanes of Persis, tried desperately to stop the Macedon offensive towards the capital city Persepolis, blocking the Persian Gates pass.
A similar action to Thermopylae occurred in April 1951 at the Battle of Kapyong when strategic Hill 677 was held by the 700 men of the Canadian 2 PPCLI against two attacking Chinese PVA divisions, encircled and outnumbered by more than 10 to 1 in the immediate battle area, and by about 30 to 1 on the larger battlefield. The PPCLI were exhausted of ammunition and supplies, but the commander Lt. Col. James Riley Stone ordered "no retreat, no surrender", and called in artillery fire on his own positions when they were overrun. The PVA divisions eventually withdrew with about 5,000 dead and a large number wounded.
Buying time
Sometimes, rather than face annihilation at the hands of a pursuing victorious army, a rearguard will be tasked by the commander of the defeated army with hindering the advance of the victorious army. Even if the rearguard is destroyed in a last stand, its sacrifice may buy their commander time to disengage without losing the majority of his army as happened during the Battle of Roncevaux Pass (778), Battle of Tirad Pass (1899), the Battle of Badgam (1947) which proved to be critical to preventing the fall of Srinagar to tribal lashkars.
Perceived duty
A last stand may also be the last pitched battle of a war where the position of the defending force is hopeless but the defending force considers it their duty not to surrender until forced to do so, as happened to the last Royalist field army of the First English Civil War at the Battle of Stow-on-the-Wold in 1646.
At the Battle of Saragarhi in 1897, the British Indian contingent consisting of 21 Sikh soldiers of the 36th Sikhs, when faced with insurmountable opposition of 10,000 Afghans, decided to make a last stand in accordance with their traditional and religious belief that duty is above all convictions. All 21 Sikhs were killed, together with approximately 600 Afghans.
During the Battle of Okinawa, the Imperial Japanese Navy battleship Yamato sailed from the Japanese home islands to join the fight, in which she would have been hopelessly outgunned. As a last ditch effort she would have beached herself on the shore, her crew joining the troops on the island and using her as a stationary gun battery. Yamato was sunk on her approach with the loss of some 3,055 crew of her complement of 3,332 after coming under attack from a large strike force of carrier borne aircraft. Given the tactical situation, one battleship accompanied by several smaller vessels with no air support against a fleet of aircraft carriers, the outcome was predictable to military leaders, and ultimately one born out of shame at being questioned by the Emperor over their lack of contribution to the ongoing defensive war effort when the Japanese Army was slowly being annihilated and while air crews were performing suicidal kamikaze missions.
At the end of a siege
Before the 20th century, "no quarter was given" if a besieged garrison had refused any offered terms of surrender prior to the attackers breaching the defences, so a last stand was part of the end of many sieges, such as the Battle of the Alamo.
However, since the 1907 IV Hague Convention it is unlawful for an attacking force to kill a garrison if they attempt to surrender, even if it is during the final assault on a fortified position. It is also forbidden to declare that "no quarter will be given".
Historical significance
Last stands loom large in history due to the pull on popular imagination. Historian Nathaniel Philbrick argues:
Long before Custer died at the Little Bighorn, the myth of the Last Stand already had a strong pull on human emotions, and on the way we like to remember history. The variations are endless — from the three hundred Spartans at Thermopylae to Davy Crockett at the Alamo—but they all tell the story of a brave and intractable hero leading his tiny band against a numberless foe. Even though the odds are overwhelming, the hero and his followers fight on nobly to the end and are slaughtered to a man. In defeat the hero of the Last Stand achieves the greatest of victories, since he will be remembered for all time.
During World War I, the expression to fight "with one's back to the wall" became a widely-known way to refer to making a last stand. The London Times reported on April 13, 1918, that General Douglas Haig ordered British troops that "Every position must be held to the last man...With our backs to the wall...each one of us must fight on to the end".
See also
References
- "last stand - Definition of last stand in English by Oxford Dictionaries". Oxford Dictionaries - English. Archived from the original on April 4, 2018.
- Rollin, Charles (1804). The ancient history of the Egyptians, Carthaginians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Medes and Persians, Macedonians, and Grecians. Vol. 3 (10 ed.). Printed for W. J. & J. Richardson. p. 34.
- Hamm, Jean Shepherd. Term Paper Resource Guide to Medieval History. Greenwood (November 25, 2009). pp. 88-90. ISBN 978-0313359675
- David Plant 1645: The Storming of Leicester and the Battle of Naseby Archived 2008-05-09 at the Wayback Machine, www.british-civil-wars.co.uk Archived 2017-06-29 at the Wayback Machine , Retrieved 2009-05-24
- Martin Marix Evans, Graham Turner. Naseby 1645: The Triumph of the New Model Army,, Osprey Publishing, 2007 ISBN 1-84603-078-1, ISBN 978-1-84603-078-9. p. 76 Archived 2023-08-17 at the Wayback Machine
- Sun, Tzu. The Art of War, Chapter XI 23-25. Archived from the original on 2018-03-08. Retrieved 2019-05-09.
- Bryan Perrett. Last Stand!: Famous Battles Against the Odds. p. 9
- "Warsaw Ghetto Uprising". United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Archived from the original on 19 January 2012. Retrieved 18 May 2014.
- "January 1943: The First Armed Resistance in the Ghetto - Holocaust Survivors Describe the Last Months in the Warsaw Ghetto – Voices from the Inferno - Yad Vashem". www.yadvashem.org. Archived from the original on 2019-04-01. Retrieved 2017-05-13.
- "Fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto - Holocaust Survivors Describe the Last Months in the Warsaw Ghetto – Voices from the Inferno - Yad Vashem". www.yadvashem.org. Archived from the original on 2019-04-01. Retrieved 2017-05-13.
- "10 Heroic Last Stands from Military History - Listverse". listverse.com. 28 August 2009. Archived from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
- Louis E. Fenech; W. H. McLeod (2014). Historical Dictionary of Sikhism. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 218. ISBN 978-1-4422-3601-1. Archived from the original on 2023-08-17. Retrieved 2020-12-04.
- Sacks, Kenneth (2003). Understanding Emerson: "The American scholar" and his struggle for self-reliance. Princeton University Press. p. 157. ISBN 978-0-691-09982-8.
- Cassin-Scott, Jack (1977). The Greek and Persian Wars 500-323 B.C. Osprey. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-85045-271-6.
- Cummins, Joseph (2011). History's Greatest Wars: The Epic Conflicts that Shaped the Modern World. Fair Winds Press. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-59233-471-1.
- Robinson, Cyril Edward (1929). A History of Greece. Methuen & Company Limited. Retrieved 7 April 2013.
- Sen, Maj Gen L. P. (1969). Slender Was the Thread: Kashmir Confrontation 1947-48. New Delhi: Orient Longman. p. 308. ISBN 0-86131-692-4. Archived from the original on 17 August 2023. Retrieved 16 August 2021.
- Sidney Low, et al., The dictionary of English history, Cassell and company, 1928. "At the battle of Naseby Astley commanded the infantry, and in 1646 he made a last stand at Stow-on-the-Wold against the Parliament."
- Pandey, Geeta (5 December 2011). "India polo match honours Sikhs' 1897 Saragarhi battle". British Broadcasting Corporation. bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 7 May 2019. Retrieved 19 July 2012.
- "Combined Fleet – tabular history of Yamato". Parshall, Jon; Bob Hackett, Sander Kingsepp, & Allyn Nevitt. 2009. Archived from the original on 29 November 2010. Retrieved 1 April 2010.
- Gunderson, Cory Gideon (2004). The battle of the Alamo. ABDO. p. 15. ISBN 1-59197-278-7.
- IV Hague Convention. The Laws and Customs of War on Land October 18, 1907.Article 23 Archived 2011-07-03 at the Wayback Machine
- Philbrick, Nathaniel. The Last Stand: Custer, Sitting Bull, and the Battle of the Little Bighorn. New York: Viking Books, 2010, p. xvii.
- Ammer, Christine. The Fact on File Dictionary of Cliches. Checkmark Books, 2001. p. 16