Revision as of 10:53, 24 November 2008 editRoadcreature (talk | contribs)4,347 edits wl, diagnosis itself is controversial, not fully understood rather than unknown← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:29, 25 November 2024 edit undoThrakkx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users38,445 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source | ||
(652 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|none}} {{cs1 config|name-list-style=vanc|display-authors=6}} | |||
{{Expand|date=April 2008}} | |||
<!-- This short description is INTENTIONALLY "none" - please see WP:SDNONE before you consider changing it! --> | |||
{{Cleanup-reason | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2020}} | |||
|date=April 2008 | |||
] | |||
|reason=Duplicated text from main article needs a makeover and structural proofreading may be needed as well.}} | |||
] (ME/CFS) is an illness with a history of controversy. Although it is classified as an ] by a majority of researchers, it was historically assumed to be psychosocial, an opinion still held among many physicians.<ref name="Thoma_2023">{{cite journal | vauthors = Thoma M, Froehlich L, Hattesohl DB, Quante S, Jason LA, Scheibenbogen C | title = Why the Psychosomatic View on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is Inconsistent with Current Evidence and Harmful to Patients | journal = Medicina | volume = 60 | issue = 1 | pages = 83 | date = December 2023 | pmid = 38256344 | pmc = 10819994 | doi = 10.3390/medicina60010083 | doi-access = free }}</ref> The ] remains unclear, there exist many competing diagnostic criteria, and some proposed ] are controversial.<ref name="pmid11446147">{{cite journal | vauthors = Hooge J | title = Chronic fatigue syndrome: cause, controversy and care | journal = British Journal of Nursing | volume = 1 | issue = 9 | pages = 440–1, 443, 445–6 | year = 1992 | pmid = 1446147 | doi = 10.12968/bjon.1992.1.9.440 }}</ref> There is a lack of education and accurate information about the condition among a significant number of medical practitioners, which has led to substantiated accusations of patient neglect and harm.<ref name="Thoma_2023" /><ref name="Baxter_2021" /> | |||
==Neglect and lack of awareness == | |||
''']''' (CFS) is an illness with a long history of controversies. For years, many professionals within the medical community did not recognize CFS as a real condition, nor was there agreement on its prevalence.<ref name="pmid1794092">{{cite journal |author=Wallace PG |title=Post-viral fatigue syndrome. Epidemiology: a critical review |journal=] |volume=47 |issue=4 |pages=942–51 |year=1991 |pmid=1794092 |doi= |url=http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=1794092 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid9231495">{{cite journal |author=Mounstephen A, Sharpe M |title=Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health |journal=] |volume=47 |issue=4 |pages=217–27 |year=1997 |pmid=9231495 |doi= |url=http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=9231495 |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid15534161">{{cite journal |author=Solomon L, Reeves WC |title=Factors influencing the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome |journal=] |volume=164 |issue=20 |pages=2241–5 |year=2004 |pmid=15534161 |doi=10.1001/archinte.164.20.2241 |url=}}</ref> There has been much disagreement over proposed cause(s), diagnosis, and treatment of the illness.<ref name="pmid1446147">{{cite journal |author=Hooge J |title=Chronic fatigue syndrome: cause, controversy and care |journal=] |volume=1 |issue=9 |pages=440–1, 443, 445–6 |year=1992 |pmid=1446147 |doi= |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid8856816">{{cite journal |author=Sharpe M |title=Chronic fatigue syndrome |journal=] |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=549–73 |year=1996 |pmid=8856816 |doi= |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid8474729">{{cite journal |author=Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch JC |title=General practitioners acceptance of the validity of chronic fatigue syndrome as a diagnosis |journal=] |volume=106 |issue=953 |pages=122–4 |year=1993 |pmid=8474729 |doi= |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid11051301">{{cite journal |author=Greenlee JE, Rose JW |title=Controversies in neurological infectious diseases |journal=] |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=375–86 |year=2000 |pmid=11051301 |doi= |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid17535450">{{cite journal |author=Horton-Salway M |title=The ME Bandwagon and other labels: constructing the genuine case in talk about a controversial illness |journal=] |volume=46 |issue=Pt 4 |pages=895–914 |year=2007 |pmid=17535450 |doi=10.1348/014466607X173456 |url=}}</ref>. | |||
ME/CFS suffers from a lack of awareness among clinical professionals. Despite being a relatively common and disabling disease, a large proportion of professionals are either unaware or dismissive of it. This often leads to patient neglect, which happens in clinical, government, bureaucratic, and research settings.<ref name="Thoma_2023" /><ref name="Pheby_2020" /><ref name="Monbiot_2024" /> | |||
===Lack of awareness in clinical settings=== | |||
The diagnosis itself is controversial. Competing ways to describe the condition(s) have been used over the years in different parts of the world (see ]). Chronic fatigue syndrome has been decried by some groups as trivializing the devastating nature of the illness. The ] is still not fully understood, and a major divide still exists over funding for research and treatment of ] versus ] and psychosocial aspects of the illness. The division is especially great between ME patient groups and psychological and psychosocial treatment advocates in the ].<ref name="pmid11037362">{{cite journal |author=Couper J |title=Chronic fatigue syndrome and Australian psychiatry: lessons from the UK experience |journal=] |volume=34 |issue=5 |pages=762–9 |year=2000 |pmid=11037362 |doi= |url=http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/openurl?genre=article&sid=nlm:pubmed&issn=0004-8674&date=2000&volume=34&issue=5&spage=762}}</ref> | |||
Despite ample evidence that ME/CFS is an organic disease, many clinicians do not recognise it as genuine or underestimate its seriousness.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Jason LA, Richman JA, Friedberg F, Wagner L, Taylor R, Jordan KM | title = Politics, science, and the emergence of a new disease. The case of chronic fatigue syndrome | journal = The American Psychologist | volume = 52 | issue = 9 | pages = 973–983 | date = September 1997 | pmid = 9301342 | doi = 10.1037/0003-066X.52.9.973 }}</ref><ref name="Thoma_2023" /><ref name="Pheby_2020">{{cite journal | vauthors = Pheby DF, Araja D, Berkis U, Brenna E, Cullinan J, de Korwin JD, Gitto L, Hughes DA, Hunter RM, Trepel D, Wang-Steverding X | title = A Literature Review of GP Knowledge and Understanding of ME/CFS: A Report from the Socioeconomic Working Group of the European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE) | journal = Medicina | volume = 57 | issue = 1 | pages = 7 | date = December 2020 | pmid = 33374291 | pmc = 7823627 | doi = 10.3390/medicina57010007 | doi-access = free }}</ref> A 2020 literature review found that “a third to a half of all ]s did not accept ME/CFS as a genuine clinical entity and, even when they did, they lacked confidence in diagnosing or managing it.”<ref name="Pheby_2020" /> | |||
A substantial proportion of medical schools do not teach about ME/CFS, and the large majority do not provide clinical exposure to ME/CFS patients.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Muirhead N, Muirhead J, Lavery G, Marsh B | title = Medical School Education on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis | journal = Medicina | volume = 57 | issue = 6 | pages = 542 | date = May 2021 | pmid = 34071264 | pmc = 8230290 | doi = 10.3390/medicina57060542 | doi-access = free }}</ref> In 2021, the UK ] found that “medical students reported that there is little or no formal training on ME/CFS in the medical curriculum and that their knowledge often comes from media”.<ref>{{cite web | work = National Institute for Care and Excellence | title = Myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy) / chronic fatigue syndrome: diagnosis and management Information, education and support for health and social care professionals | quote = NICE guideline NG206, Evidence reviews underpinning recommendations and research, recommendations in the NICE guideline | date = October 2021 | url = https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng206/evidence/b-information-education-and-support-for-health-and-social-care-professionals-pdf-9265183023 }}</ref> | |||
==The name== | |||
Some patient groups say the name chronic fatigue syndrome is unsatisfactory, and they want it changed because they feel it trivializes the illness.<ref name="Jason">{{cite journal|author=Jason LA, Taylor RR| year=2001|title= Measuring Attributions About Chronic Fatigue Syndrome|journal=J Chronic Fatigue Syndr| volume=8|issue=3/4 |pages=31–40 |url=http://www.cfids-cab.org/cfs-inform/Welcome/jason.taylor01.txt |format=TXT|doi= 10.1300/J092v08n03_04}}</ref> | |||
According to a survey of medical trainees at a school in the ], a condition described as chronic fatigue syndrome may be considered less serious than a condition described as myalgic encephalopathy.<ref name="pmid11928774">{{cite journal |author=Jason LA, Taylor RR, Plioplys S, Stepanek Z, Shlaes J |title=Evaluating attributions for an illness based upon the name: chronic fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalopathy and Florence Nightingale disease |journal=Am J Community Psychol |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=133–48 |year=2002 |pmid=11928774 |doi=}}</ref> | |||
Training influences attitudes towards ME/CFS. One study conducted a relatively brief seminar presenting factual information on the illness to a cohort of fourth year medical students. The authors concluded the information provided was associated with a more favorable attitude toward ME/CFS.<ref name="pmid18608944">{{cite journal |vauthors=Friedberg F, Sohl SJ, Halperin PJ| s2cid = 23465440 | title = Teaching medical students about medically unexplained illnesses: A preliminary study | journal=Med Teach | volume = 30 | issue = 6| pages = 618–21 |date=May 2008 | pmid = 18608944 | doi = 10.1080/01421590801946970 }}</ref> | |||
==The cause(s), diagnosis, and treatment== | |||
Contrasting viewpoints among CFS experts have become apparent. In a letter to the Lancet in 1993, psychiatrists David and ] contested the WHO classification of CFS under diseases of the nervous system, arguing that it was a form of ] to be classified as a psychiatric condition.<ref>{{cite journal |author=David A, Wessely S |title=Chronic fatigue, ME, and ICD-10 |journal=Lancet |volume=342 |issue=8881 |pages=1247–8 |year=1993 |pmid=7901572 |doi=}}</ref> Dutch researchers authored a 1998 study that developed and tested a model where behavioral, cognitive, and affective factors played a role in perpetuating fatigue, and concluded that this was the correct model for CFS.<ref>Vercoulen JHMM, Swanink CMA, Galama JMD, Fennis JFM, Jongen PHJ, Hommes OR, Van der Meer JWM, Bleijenberg G. (1998), "The persistence of fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis: Development of a model. Journal of Psychosomatic Research", 45, 507 – 517</ref> After an attempted replication of the Dutch model with a 2005 population-based study, United States researchers stated the model adequately represented chronic fatigue secondary to psychiatric conditions, but not CFS. They reported finding important differences between CFS and psychiatrically explained chronic fatigue which could affect the development of therapy and explanatory models.<ref>Song, S, Jason, LA (2005), "A population based study of CFS experienced in differing patient groups. An effort to replicate Vercoulen et al.'s model of CFS", Journal of Mental Health, 14, 3, 277-289</ref> | |||
===Neglect of patients=== | |||
For years, many professionals within the medical community did not recognize CFS as a real condition, nor was there agreement on its prevalence.<ref name= "pmid1794092">{{cite journal | last = Wallace | first = PG. | title = Post-viral fatigue syndrome. Epidemiology: a critical review | journal = Br Med Bull. | volume = 47 | issue = 4 | pages = 942–951 | year = 1991 | month = October | pmid = 1794092}}</ref><ref name= "pmid9231495">{{cite journal | last = Mounstephen | first = A, | coauthors = Sharpe M. | title = Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health | journal = Occup Med (Lond). May;47(4):. | volume = 47 | issue = 4 | pages = 217–227 | year = 1997 | month = May | pmid = 1794092 | doi = 10.1093/occmed/47.4.217}}</ref> There has been much disagreement over proposed cause(s), diagnosis, and treatment of the illness.<ref name= "pmid11446147">{{cite journal |author=Hooge J |title=Chronic fatigue syndrome: cause, controversy and care |journal=Br J Nurs |volume=1 |issue=9 |pages=440–1, 443, 445–6 |year=1992 |pmid=1446147 |doi=}}</ref><ref name= "pmid8856816">{{cite journal |author=Sharpe M |title=Chronic fatigue syndrome |journal=Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. |volume=19 |issue=3 |pages=549–73 |year=1996 |pmid=8856816 |doi=}}</ref><ref name= "pmid8474729">{{cite journal |author=Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch JC |title=General practitioners acceptance of the validity of chronic fatigue syndrome as a diagnosis |journal=N. Z. Med. J. |volume=106 |issue=953 |pages=122–4 |year=1993 |pmid=8474729 |doi=}}</ref><ref name= "pmid11051301">{{cite journal |author=Greenlee JE, Rose JW |title=Controversies in neurological infectious diseases |journal=Semin Neurol |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=375–86 |year=2000 |pmid=11051301 |doi=}}</ref><ref name= "pmid17535450">{{cite journal |author=Horton-Salway M |title=The ME Bandwagon and other labels: constructing the genuine case in talk about a controversial illness |journal=Br J Soc Psychol |volume=46 |issue=Pt 4 |pages=895–914 |year=2007 |pmid=17535450 |doi=10.1348/014466607X173456}}</ref> It may be necessary to embrace medical uncertainty, and also to accept patient experience in order to facilitate diagnosis, treatment, and recovery process.<ref name="pmid14572929">{{cite journal |author=Zavestoski S, Brown P, McCormick S, Mayer B, D'Ottavi M, Lucove JC |title=Patient activism and the struggle for diagnosis: Gulf War illnesses and other medically unexplained physical symptoms in the US |journal=Soc Sci Med |volume=58 |issue=1 |pages=161–75 |year=2004 |pmid=14572929 |doi=}}</ref> It is suggested that a context of contested causation may have serious negative effects on healthcare for individuals. Contested causation may erode patient-provider trust, test the provider's self-assurance and capacity to share power with the patient, and raise problematic issues of reparation, compensation and blame.<ref name="pmid12194900">{{cite journal |author=Engel CC, Adkins JA, Cowan DN |title=Caring for medically unexplained physical symptoms after toxic environmental exposures: effects of contested causation |journal=Environ. Health Perspect.|volume=110 Suppl 4 |issue= |pages=641–7 |year=2002 |pmid=12194900 |doi=}}</ref> | |||
]]] | |||
Governments, medical institutions, and the medical community have been criticised for neglecting people with ME/CFS.<ref name="Thoma_2023" /><ref name="www.nice.org.uk_2021" /><ref name="Tschopp_2023">{{cite journal | vauthors = Tschopp R, König RS, Rejmer P, Paris DH | title = Health system support among patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland | journal = Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences | volume = 18 | issue = 4 | pages = 876–885 | date = August 2023 | pmid = 36852237 | pmc = 9957780 | doi = 10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.12.019 | url = https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.12.019 | access-date = 15 April 2024 | url-status = live | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240415113153/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658361222002396?via%3Dihub | archive-date = 15 April 2024 }}</ref><ref name="Chowdhury_2023">{{Cite web | vauthors = Chowdhury S |date=2023-05-23 |title=Freedom of Information Findings Report |url=https://www.actionforme.org.uk/uploads/images/2023/05/Action_for_M.E._-_FOI_report.pdf |access-date=2024-04-15 |website=Action for ME |archive-date=14 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231214030247/https://www.actionforme.org.uk/uploads/images/2023/05/Action_for_M.E._-_FOI_report.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> ], a journalist for the Guardian, called the neglect and its consequences “the greatest medical scandal of the 21st century”.<ref name="Monbiot_2024">{{Cite news | vauthors = Monbiot G |date=2024-03-12 |title='You don't want to get better': the outdated treatment of ME/CFS patients is a national scandal |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/12/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-me-treatments-social-services |access-date=2024-04-15 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=4 April 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240404000359/https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/12/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-me-treatments-social-services |url-status=live }}</ref> Individuals with the condition describe the struggle for healthcare and legitimacy due to what is described as bureaucratic denial of the condition because of its lack of a known etiology. Institutions maintain the exclusion of patient support by rhetorical arguments of the open-endedness of science to delay new findings of fact.<ref name="pmid9231495">{{cite journal | vauthors = Mounstephen A, Sharpe M | title = Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health | journal = Occupational Medicine | volume = 47 | issue = 4 | pages = 217–227 | date = May 1997 | pmid = 9231495 | doi = 10.1093/occmed/47.4.217 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="pmid16085344">{{cite journal | vauthors = Dumit J | title = Illnesses you have to fight to get: facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses | journal = Social Science & Medicine | volume = 62 | issue = 3 | pages = 577–590 | date = February 2006 | pmid = 16085344 | doi = 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.018 }}</ref> | |||
A 2006 investigation by a group from the ] found there was not enough support in the UK for CFS patients in terms of access to government benefits and health care.<ref name="pmid16935965">{{cite journal | vauthors = Gibson I | title = A new look at chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis | journal = Journal of Clinical Pathology | volume = 60 | issue = 2 | pages = 120–1 | date = February 2007 | pmid = 16935965 | pmc = 1860614 | doi = 10.1136/jcp.2006.042432 }}</ref> | |||
In Norway a study to explore obstructions for quality care from experiences by patients suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome, concluded that current medical skepticism and ignorance regarding CFS shapes the context of medical care and the illness experiences of CFS patients, who may feel they neither get a proper assessment nor management. CFS patients' reports about patronizing attitudes and ignorance among doctors call for development of evidence based strategies and empowerment of patients, acknowledging the patients' understanding of symptoms and the complex nature of the disease. | |||
<ref name="pmid18486415">{{cite journal |author=Gilje AM, Söderlund A, Malterud K |title=Obstructions for quality care experienced by patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)-A case study |journal=Patient Educ Couns |volume= |issue= |pages= |year=2008 |month=May |pmid=18486415 |doi=10.1016/j.pec.2008.04.001 |url=}}</ref> | |||
==Mass hysteria accusations== | |||
This 2008 study examined how medical student attitudes toward CFS, (a more strongly stigmatized illness) was influenced by an interactive seminar focusing on two medically unexplained illnesses, CFS and fibromyalgia. Before the seminar assessment revealed a neutral to slightly favorable attitude toward CFS. At the end of the seminar, significantly more favorable attitudes were found, in general (P < 0.01) and for more CFS research funding (P < 0.001) flexible hours for people with CFS (P < 0.01) and viewing CFS as not primarily a psychological disorder (P < 0.01). It was shown that a relatively brief exposure to factual information on specific medically unexplained illnesses was associated with more favorable attitudes toward CFS among fourth year medical students. <ref name="pmid18608944">{{cite journal |author=Friedberg F, Sohl SJ, Halperin PJ |title=Teaching medical students about medically unexplained illnesses: A preliminary study |journal=Med Teach |volume= |issue= |pages=1–4 |year=2008 |month=May |pmid=18608944 |doi=10.1080/01421590801946970 |url=}}</ref> | |||
Epidemic cases of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) were called ] by psychiatrists McEvedy and Beard in 1970,<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = McEvedy CP, Beard AW | title = Concept of benign myalgic encephalomyelitis | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 1 | issue = 5687 | pages = 11–5 | date = January 1970 | pmid = 5411596 | pmc = 1700895 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.1.5687.11 }}</ref> provoking criticism in letters to the editor of the '']'' by attending physicians, researchers, and nurses who fell ill.<ref name= PMID5370039>{{cite journal | vauthors = Scott BD | title = Epidemic malaise | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 1 | issue = 5689 | pages = 170 | date = January 1970 | pmid = 5370039 | pmc = 1699088 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.1.111.170 }}</ref><ref name=Compston>{{cite journal | vauthors = Compston ND, Dimsdale HE, Ramsay AM, Richardson AT |title=Epidemic Malaise |journal=British Medical Journal|volume=1 |issue=5692 |pages=362–363 |date=February 1970 |pmc= 1699022|doi= 10.1136/bmj.1.5692.362-a}}</ref><ref name=Acheson>{{cite journal | vauthors = Acheson ED|title=Epidemic Malaise |journal=British Medical Journal|volume=1 |issue=5692 |pages=363–4 |date=February 1970 |pmid= <!--none-->|pmc= 1698971|doi= 10.1136/bmj.1.5692.363-b}}</ref><ref name= PMID5435167>{{cite journal | vauthors = Gosling PH | title = Epidemic malaise | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 1 | issue = 5694 | pages = 499–500 | date = February 1970 | pmid = 5435167 | pmc = 1699452 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.1.5694.499-b }}</ref><ref name= PMID5435168>{{cite journal | vauthors = Purke GJ | title = Epidemic malaise | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 1 | issue = 5694 | pages = 500 | date = February 1970 | pmid = 5435168 | pmc = 1699458 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.1.5694.500 }}</ref><ref name= PMID5435169>{{cite journal | vauthors = Hopkins EJ | title = Epidemic malaise | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 1 | issue = 5694 | pages = 500–1 | date = February 1970 | pmid = 5435169 | pmc = 1699426 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.1.5694.500-a }}</ref><ref name= PMID5435170>{{cite journal | vauthors = Galpine JF | title = Epidemic malaise | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 1 | issue = 5694 | pages = 501 | date = February 1970 | pmid = 5435170 | pmc = 1699416 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.1.5694.501 }}</ref><ref name= PMID5420612>{{cite journal | vauthors = Poskanzer DC | title = Epidemic malaise | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 2 | issue = 5706 | pages = 420–1 | date = May 1970 | pmid = 5420612 | pmc = 1700311 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.2.5706.420-b }}</ref><ref name= PMID4316803>{{cite journal | vauthors = Parish JG | title = Epidemic malaise | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 3 | issue = 5713 | pages = 47–8 | date = July 1970 | pmid = 4316803 | pmc = 1700986 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.3.5713.47-c }}</ref>{{Excessive citations inline|date=March 2024}} | |||
===ICD Classification=== | |||
The psychiatrists were criticized for not investigating the patients they described,<ref name="hooper_pathol_06">{{cite journal | vauthors = Hooper M | title = Myalgic encephalomyelitis: a review with emphasis on key findings in biomedical research | journal = Journal of Clinical Pathology | volume = 60 | issue = 5 | pages = 466–71 | date = May 2007 | pmid = 16935967 | pmc = 1994528 | doi = 10.1136/jcp.2006.042408 }}</ref> and their conclusions have been refuted.<ref name="pmid 10583715">{{cite journal | vauthors = Evengård B, Schacterle RS, Komaroff AL | title = Chronic fatigue syndrome: new insights and old ignorance | journal = Journal of Internal Medicine | volume = 246 | issue = 5 | pages = 455–69 | date = November 1999 | pmid = 10583715 | doi = 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00513.x | url = http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119095441/PDFSTART | doi-access = | s2cid = 34123925 }}{{dead link|date=February 2019|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref><ref name="pmid 3128374">{{cite journal | vauthors = David AS, Wessely S, Pelosi AJ | title = Postviral fatigue syndrome: time for a new approach | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 296 | issue = 6623 | pages = 696–9 | date = March 1988 | pmid = 3128374 | pmc = 2545306 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.296.6623.696 }}</ref><ref name="pmid2294610">{{cite journal | vauthors = Stricklin A, Sewell M, Austad C | title = Objective measurement of personality variables in epidemic neuromyasthenia patients | journal = South African Medical Journal = Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Geneeskunde | volume = 77 | issue = 1 | pages = 31–4 | date = January 1990 | pmid = 2294610 }}</ref> In 1978 a symposium held at the ] (RSM) concluded that ''epidemic myalgic encephalomyelitis'' was a distinct disease entity.<ref name="pmid647324">{{cite journal | author = No authors listed | title = Epidemic myalgic encephalomyelitis | journal = British Medical Journal | volume = 1 | issue = 6125 | pages = 1436–7 | date = June 1978 | pmid = 647324 | pmc = 1604957 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.1.2791.1436-a }}</ref> | |||
In 2001, King's College, London, a Collaborating Center of the WHO, published a "Guide to Mental Health in Primary Care" in which ME/CFS was also classified as a mental illness in ICD-10, under the code F48.0. The guide was also published on the website of the Collaborating Center, King's College. In response to activist protests to the Collaborating Center and the WHO's headquarters, the web page was revised and a correction to the guide promised. Andre L'Hours, Technical Officer at the WHO headquarters in Geneva, stated that it was "unacceptable" to classify one disorder in two places in the ICD-10. | |||
However, the idea that CFS may be culturally mediated persisted in some quarters. In her 1997 book ''Hystories: Hysterical Epidemics and Modern Culture,'' literary critic and feminist ] argues that chronic fatigue syndrome is a "hysterical narrative", a modern manifestation of ], a self-perpetuating "cultural symptom of anxiety and stress" historically assigned to women.<ref name="showalter">{{cite book | vauthors = Showalter E | title = Hystories: hysterical epidemics and modern media | publisher=Columbia University Press | location = New York | year = 1997 | pages = | isbn = 978-0-231-10459-3 }}</ref> | |||
The ] brought the matter to the attention of the House of Lords on January 22nd, 2004, citing the position of the WHO<ref>Saraceno B, 16th October 2001 (letter), World Health Organisation</ref> of how the illness is classified (G93.3), and that WHO intended no change. Subsequently, Lord Warner wrote<ref>Warner N, 11 February 2004 (letter) Department of Health, Whitehall, London </ref> stating The London WHO Collaborating Center had ceded to WHO authority and would ensure future editions of the Guide were corrected. In response to an activist, Professor Anthony Sheehan, Professor of Care Services at the Department on Health, on behalf of Sir Liam Donaldson, then Medical Chief Officer, replied "The WHO; the WHO Collaborating Centre; and the Department of Health have now agreed a position on the classification of CFS/ME. It has been agreed that the second edition of the WHO Guide to Mental Health and neurology in primary care will have only one ICD-10 code for CFS. This is G93.3. I can only say that the Department of Health has no plans to seek a reclassification of CFS within ICD-10." | |||
==Research |
== Research related == | ||
===Lack of funding=== | |||
The etiology is still not known, and a major divide still exists over funding for research and treatment of ] verses ] and ] aspects of the illness. The division is especially great between ME patient groups and psychological and psychosocial treatment advocates in Great Britain.<ref name= "pmid17535450"/> | |||
Governments and health organisations have been criticised for their lack of funding into ME/CFS research. ME/CFS is one of the most underfunded diseases compared to disease burden.<ref name="Mirin_2020">{{cite journal | vauthors = Mirin AA, Dimmock ME, Jason LA | title = Research update: The relation between ME/CFS disease burden and research funding in the USA | journal = Work | volume = 66 | issue = 2 | pages = 277–282 | date = 2020-07-20 | pmid = 32568148 | doi = 10.3233/WOR-203173 | veditors = Mooney A }}</ref><ref name="Mirin_2022" /> The funds are only approximately 3-7% of what comparable diseases are allocated.<ref name="Mirin_2020" /><ref name="Mirin_2022">{{Cite journal | vauthors = Mirin AA, Dimmock ME, Jason LA |date=2022-04-03 |title=Updated ME/CFS prevalence estimates reflecting post-COVID increases and associated economic costs and funding implications |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21641846.2022.2062169 |journal=Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior |language=en |volume=10 |issue=2 |pages=83–93 |doi=10.1080/21641846.2022.2062169 |issn=2164-1846}}</ref> Meanwhile the economic impact of ME/CFS is estimated at 149-362 billion USD in the United States alone.<ref name="Mirin_2022" /> | |||
===XMRV retrovirus=== | |||
== Transmissibility hypothesis == | |||
{{Main|Judy Mikovits#XMRV and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome}} | |||
] | |||
In a 1998 paper, Garth and Nancy Nicolson assert that some US veterans with Gulf War Syndrome are really suffering from CFS/ME or ] and that these conditions are contagious. This hypothesis is not accepted by other researchers. The Nicolsons claim the government lacks effective treatment programs for veterans, allowing the illness to spread to non-veterans.<ref name= "pmid9633269">{{cite journal |author=Nicolson GL, Nicolson NL |title=Gulf War illnesses: complex medical, scientific and political paradox |journal=Med Confl Surviv |volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=156–65 |year=1998 |pmid=9633269 |doi=}}</ref> | |||
In 2009, the journal ''Science''<ref name="Lombardi VC 585–9">{{cite journal | vauthors = Lombardi VC, Ruscetti FW, Das Gupta J, Pfost MA, Hagen KS, Peterson DL, Ruscetti SK, Bagni RK, Petrow-Sadowski C, Gold B, Dean M, Silverman RH, Mikovits JA | title = Detection of an infectious retrovirus, XMRV, in blood cells of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome | journal = Science | volume = 326 | issue = 5952 | pages = 585–9 | date = October 2009 | pmid = 19815723 | pmc = 3073172 | doi = 10.1126/science.1179052 | bibcode = 2009Sci...326..585L }}{{Retracted|doi=10.1126/science.334.6063.1636-a|pmid=22194552|http://retractionwatch.com/2011/09/22/why-did-science-partially-retract-the-xmrv-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-paper/ ''Retraction Watch''|http://retractionwatch.com/2011/12/22/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-xmrv-paper-retracted-by-science-completely-this-time/ ''Retraction Watch''|http://retractionwatch.com/2014/03/11/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-researcher-mikovits-who-championed-link-to-xmrv-to-publish-book/ ''Retraction Watch''|http://retractionwatch.com/2011/05/31/science-asks-authors-to-retact-xmrv-chronic-fatigue-paper-when-they-refuse-issue-expression-of-concern/ ''Retraction Watch''|intentional=yes}}</ref> published a study that identified the ] in blood samples of a population of people with CFS. After the ''Science'' publication, media attention generated interest in the XMRV virus worldwide. | |||
Many countries reacted quickly to protect the blood supply from the XMRV retrovirus by banning persons with CFS from donating blood. The ] funded a 1.3 million dollar study to try to validate the findings, and some people with the illness started taking antiviral drugs in hopes of symptomatic improvement.<ref name="Nature 2011">{{cite journal |vauthors=Callaway E |date=March 2011 |title=Virology: Fighting for a cause |journal=Nature |volume=471 |issue=7338 |pages=282–5 |bibcode=2011Natur.471..282C |doi=10.1038/471282a |pmid=21412308 |s2cid=1416235 |doi-access=free}}</ref> Organizations adopting these or similar measures included the ],<ref>{{cite news |date=7 April 2010 |title=No blood from chronic fatigue donors: agency |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/no-blood-from-chronic-fatigue-donors-agency-1.874955 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100411035136/http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2010/04/07/blood-donations-chronic-fatigue-virus.html |archive-date=11 April 2010 |access-date=25 June 2010 |publisher=]}}</ref> the ],<ref>{{cite web |date=21 April 2010 |title=Chronic Fatigue Set To Disqualify Blood Donors |url=http://www.voxy.co.nz/national/chronic-fatigue-set-disqualify-blood-donors/5/45805 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100424172954/http://www.voxy.co.nz/national/chronic-fatigue-set-disqualify-blood-donors/5/45805 |archive-date=24 April 2010 |access-date=25 June 2010 |publisher=Voxy.co.nz |vauthors=Atkinson K}}</ref> the ]<ref>{{cite web |title=Blood Service updates CFS donor policy |url=http://www.donateblood.com.au/media-centre/latest-national-news/blood-service-updates-cfs-donor-policy |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131014065501/http://www.donateblood.com.au/media-centre/latest-national-news/blood-service-updates-cfs-donor-policy |archive-date=14 October 2013 |access-date=7 July 2013 |publisher=]}}</ref> and the ].<ref>{{cite web |date=18 June 2010 |title=Recommendation on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Blood Donation |url=http://www.aabb.org/pressroom/Pages/cfsrecommendation.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100625094629/http://www.aabb.org/pressroom/Pages/cfsrecommendation.aspx |archive-date=25 June 2010 |access-date=25 June 2010 |publisher=]}}</ref> In November 2010, the UK National Blood Service permanently deferred ME/CFS patients from donating blood to prevent potential harm to the donor.<ref>{{cite web |author=NHS Blood and Transplant |date=5 November 2010 |title=ME/CFS sufferers permanently deferred from giving blood |url=http://www.nhsbt.nhs.uk/news-and-media/news-archive/news_2010_10_07.asp |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151128165120/http://www.nhsbt.nhs.uk/news-and-media/news-archive/news_2010_10_07.asp |archive-date=28 November 2015 |access-date=9 October 2011}}</ref> | |||
== Support for patients == | |||
Sufferers describe the struggle for healthcare and legitimacy due to what they consider to be bureaucratic denial of the condition because of its lack of a known etiology. Institutions maintain the exclusion of patient support by rhetorical arguments of the open-endedness of science to delay new findings of fact. Patient groups respond to the systematic nature of these exclusions by developing counter-arguments. This has resulted in an expensive and prolonged conflict for all involved.<ref name= "pmid16085344">{{cite journal | last = Dumit | first = J. | title = Illnesses you have to fight to get: facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses.| journal = Soc Sci Med. | volume = Feb;62 | issue = 3 | pages = 577–90 | date = 2005-08-08 | pmid = 16085344}}</ref><ref name= "pmid9231495"/> | |||
Many studies failed to reproduce this finding,<ref name="PLoSOne">{{cite journal | vauthors = Erlwein O, Kaye S, McClure MO, Weber J, Wills G, Collier D, Wessely S, Cleare A | title = Failure to detect the novel retrovirus XMRV in chronic fatigue syndrome | journal = PLOS ONE | volume = 5 | issue = 1 | pages = e8519 | date = January 2010 | pmid = 20066031 | pmc = 2795199 | doi = 10.1371/journal.pone.0008519 | veditors = Nixon DF | bibcode = 2010PLoSO...5.8519E | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Groom HC, Boucherit VC, Makinson K, Randal E, Baptista S, Hagan S, Gow JW, Mattes FM, Breuer J, Kerr JR, Stoye JP, Bishop KN | title = Absence of xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus in UK patients with chronic fatigue syndrome | journal = Retrovirology | volume = 7 | issue = 1 | pages = 10 | date = February 2010 | pmid = 20156349 | pmc = 2839973 | doi = 10.1186/1742-4690-7-10 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="van_Kuppeveld">{{cite journal | vauthors = van Kuppeveld FJ, de Jong AS, Lanke KH, Verhaegh GW, Melchers WJ, Swanink CM, Bleijenberg G, Netea MG, Galama JM, van der Meer JW | title = Prevalence of xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in the Netherlands: retrospective analysis of samples from an established cohort | journal = BMJ | volume = 340 | pages = c1018 | date = February 2010 | pmid = 20185493 | pmc = 2829122 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.c1018 }}</ref> and recriminations of misconduct from the various stakeholders grew angry and bitter.<ref name="Nature 2011"/> | |||
In 1998 it became known almost 13 million dollars for CFS research had been redirected or improperly accounted for by the United States CDC. The agency stated the need to respond to other public health emergencies. The director of a U.S. national patient advocacy group charged the CDC had a bias against studying the disease.<ref name= "pmid10932206">{{cite journal | last = Dove | first = A. | title = GAO reports on CFS funding controversy| journal = Nat Med. | volume = 6 | issue = 8 | pages = 846 | year = 2000 | month = August |url = http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v6/n8/full/nm0800_846a.html | pmid = 10932206 | accessdate = 2008-04-02 | doi = 10.1038/78579 }}</ref> | |||
In 2011, the editor of ''Science'' formally retracted its XMRV paper<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Alberts B | title = Retraction | journal = Science | volume = 334 | issue = 6063 | pages = 1636 | date = December 2011 | pmid = 22194552 | doi = 10.1126/science.334.6063.1636-a | bibcode = 2011Sci...334.1636A | doi-access = free }}</ref> while the ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' similarly retracted a 2010 paper which had appeared to support the finding of a connection between XMRV and CFS.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Lo SC, Pripuzova N, Li B, Komaroff AL, Hung GC, Wang R, Alter HJ | title = Retraction for Lo et al., Detection of MLV-related virus gene sequences in blood of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy blood donors | journal = Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | volume = 109 | issue = 1 | pages = 346 | date = January 2012 | pmid = 22203980 | pmc = 3252929 | doi = 10.1073/pnas.1119641109 | bibcode = 2012PNAS..109..346. | doi-access = free }}</ref> Studies eventually concluded that neither people nor the blood supply had been infected with the XMRV virus, and the origin of the virus was likely a lab contaminant in the supplies used by the ] (PCR) process of the studies that found virus in blood.<ref name="Johnson Cohn 2015 p. ">{{cite journal | vauthors = Johnson AD, Cohn CS | title = Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Virus (XMRV) and the Safety of the Blood Supply | journal = Clinical Microbiology Reviews | volume = 29 | issue = 4 | pages = 749–57 | date = October 2016 | pmid = 27358491 | doi = 10.1128/CMR.00086-15 | pmc = 5010753 }}</ref> | |||
The insurance industry - and claims departments, in particular - are increasingly having to deal with a rapidly growing phenomenon of "controversial illnesses" which affects not only life business, but also health, worker's compensation and motor third-party liability. When assessing compensation and settling claims, due to a claimed lack of recognition of the conditions by medical associations, insurers often consider that the illness may have been "imaginary" or aggravated. <ref name="pmid18405228">{{cite journal |author=Regenauer A |title= |language=German |journal=Versicherungsmedizin |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=3–7 |year=2008 |month=March |pmid=18405228 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | |||
===PACE trial=== | |||
==Diagnostic controversies== | |||
{{Refimprove|date=October 2008}} | |||
Historically, many doctors were unfamiliar with CFS, and some refused to diagnose it. Others allegedly minimized the seriousness of CFS.<ref>{{cite journal | author = Jason LA, Richman JA, Friedberg F, Wagner L, Taylor R, Jordan KM | title = Politics, science, and the emergence of a new disease. The case of chronic fatigue syndrome. | journal = Am Psychol | volume = 52 | issue = 9 | pages = 973–83 | year = 1997 | pmid = 9301342 | doi = 10.1037/0003-066X.52.9.973}}</ref> The diagnosis has gained wider acceptance. In the UK, the 2002 ]'s report stated that all doctors should consider CFS as a serious chronic illness and treat patients accordingly.<ref name=CMOrept2002>CFS/ME Working Group. ''A report of the CFS/ME working group: report to the chief medical officer of an independent working group.'' London: Department of Health, 2002. .</ref> Similar statements have been made in the United States.<ref name="CDC-awareness">] ]. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</ref><ref name="CDCToolkit">Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006), " CFS Toolkit: Fact Sheets for Healthcare Professionals"</ref> A 2005 study in the UK surveyed 811 general practitioners' attitudes and knowledge of CFS. 72% accepted CFS as a recognizable clinical entity, but 48% did not feel confident diagnosing it, and 41% did not feel confident in treatment.<ref name= "pmid15805128">{{cite journal |author=Bowen J, Pheby D, Charlett A, McNulty C |title=Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: a survey of GPs' attitudes and knowledge |journal=] |volume=22 |issue=4 |pages=389–93 |year=2005 |pmid=15805128 |doi=10.1093/fampra/cmi019 |url=}}</ref> In November 2007, the CFS Advisory Commitee (Part of the US Department of Health), stated responses from 1,500 US primary care providers showed, | |||
90 percent believed CFS can impair quality of life, 20 percent strongly or somewhat agreed that CFS is only in the patient’s head, and 30 percent said enough information is available to diagnose CFS.<ref name= "CFSAC_Nov2007">{{cite conference | |||
| first = Chair Oleske James M. | title = Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Advisory Committee (CFSAC) meeting | publisher = U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | date = November 28-29, 2007 | location = Room 800, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Washington, D.C. 20201 | url = http://www.hhs.gov/advcomcfs/cfsac071128min.html | doi = | id = | accessdate = 2008-04-18}}</ref> In New Zealand in 1993, a survey of general practitioners found a 90% acceptance rate of chronic fatigue syndrome as a clinically valid diagnosis.<ref name="pmid8474729">{{cite journal |author=Denz-Penhey H, Murdoch JC |title=General practitioners acceptance of the validity of chronic fatigue syndrome as a diagnosis |journal=] |volume=106 |issue=953 |pages=122–4 |year=1993 |pmid=8474729 |doi= |url=}}</ref> | |||
{{main|PACE trial}} | |||
There remains considerable skepticism amongst some medical professionals about the existence of CFS as a "real" — i.e. medical as opposed to behavioral — condition.{{Fact|date=September 2008}} Many people are inclined to believe that a condition with few or no specific biomedical markers may be psychological in origin.{{Fact|date=September 2008}} This had led to a frustration in many patients, who feel that their disability is not psychological, but biological, and point to the epidemic history and biomedical research trends.{{Fact|date=September 2008}} Alternatively, some doctors and patients believe that the illnesses are real, but conceptualising them under a CFS banner amounts to misdiagnosis, largely due to the near-absolute exclusion of physical and laboratory signs required by the popular CFS criteria and the excuse to give up looking for treatable abnormalities.{{Fact|date=September 2008}} | |||
] | |||
PACE was a large trial investigating the efficacy and safety of three treatments adjunctive to specialist medical care (SMC): ] (CBT), ] (GET), and ] (APT). The results were published in February 2011 and concluded that CBT and GET were each "moderately" effective compared to SMC alone, while APT was not found to be effective when added to SMC.<ref name="White_2011">{{cite journal | vauthors = White PD, Goldsmith KA, Johnson AL, Potts L, Walwyn R, DeCesare JC, Baber HL, Burgess M, Clark LV, Cox DL, Bavinton J, Angus BJ, Murphy G, Murphy M, O'Dowd H, Wilks D, McCrone P, Chalder T, Sharpe M | title = Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial | journal = Lancet | volume = 377 | issue = 9768 | pages = 823–36 | date = March 2011 | pmid = 21334061 | pmc = 3065633 | doi = 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60096-2 }}</ref> | |||
The trial generated considerable criticism. ] critiqued the definitions of secondary outcomes, questioned ], and expressed concern over generalisability of the results. Patient groups and the IACFS/ME (an organization of researchers and health care professionals interested in CFS)<ref name="IACFSME24Feb2011">{{cite web | title = IACFS/ME Statement on the PACE Trial: The Issue of Illness 'Reversal' | date = 24 February 2011 | work = The International Association for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ME (IACFS/ME) |url= http://www.iacfsme.org/PACETrial/tabid/450/Default.aspx |access-date=2011-08-03 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718151623/http://www.iacfsme.org/PACETrial/tabid/450/Default.aspx |archive-date=18 July 2011 }}</ref> criticized the trial for over-simplified and exaggerated conclusions, for using a flawed psychosocial illness model that ignores biological evidence, for testing a non-representative version of pacing, and because the results seriously conflict with their member surveys which show that pacing is effective and CBT or GET can cause deterioration in many patients who use the treatments.<ref name="AfME-surprise">{{cite web | title = PACE: 'surprising and disappointing' | date = 18 February 2011 | work = Action for ME | url = http://www.afme.org.uk/news.asp?newsid=1047 | access-date = 3 August 2011 | archive-date = 25 February 2011 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110225030859/http://www.afme.org.uk/news.asp?newsid=1047 | url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web | title = ME Association press statement about the results of the PACE study | vauthors = Britton T | work = ME Association | date = 18 February 2011 | url = http://www.meassociation.org.uk/?p=4607 | access-date = 3 August 2011 | archive-date = 27 July 2011 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110727195627/http://www.meassociation.org.uk/?p=4607 | url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Falling off the PACE| vauthors = McCleary K |access-date= 26 July 2011|website=The CAA (CFIDS) Association of America|url=http://www.cfids.org/pdf/lancet-analysis.pdf|url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110625051513/http://cfids.org/pdf/lancet-analysis.pdf |archive-date=25 June 2011}}</ref> | |||
According to Malcolm Hooper, a researcher who thinks the term "myalgic encephalomyelitis" (ME) should be used in place of CFS, research into ME in the UK has been mostly hijacked by a "lobby of psychologists and psychiatrists" who he claims holds significant power within the medical fraternity, with a resultant "gross abuse/neglect of patients."<ref name="hooper_pathol_06">{{cite journal | author = Hooper M | title = Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME): a review with emphasis on key findings in biomedical research. | journal = J Clin Pathol | year = 2006 | doi = 10.1136/jcp.2006.042408 | volume = 60 | pages = 466}}</ref> The UK and the ] have particularly seen disagreements between biomedical researchers and their adherents, and psychiatrists (particularly proponents of ], or CBT) and supporters of the theory that CFS is at least partly psychological in origin, pointing to numerous high-quality studies concluding that CFS can be effectively managed by ] and ].<ref>{{cite journal | author = Van Houdenhove B | title = What is the aim of cognitive behaviour therapy in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome? | journal = Journal of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics | volume = 75 | issue = 6 | pages = 396–7 | year = 2006 | pmid = 17053343 | doi = 10.1159/000095448}}</ref> | |||
One researcher submitted a 442-page letter to the Medical Research Council outlining his criticisms of the trial, and a shorter 43-page complaint to the ''Lancet''. The MRC and the ''Lancet'' rejected the submissions. A ''Lancet'' editorial responded to the adverse criticism by suggesting that some critics could be part of "an active campaign to discredit the research."<ref name="PMID 21592553">{{cite journal | author= (Editorial) | s2cid = 32809857 | title = Patients' power and PACE | journal=Lancet | volume = 377 | issue = 9780 | pages = 1808 |date=May 2011 | pmid = 21592553 | doi = 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60696-X }}</ref><ref name="hawkes">{{cite journal | vauthors = Hawkes N | s2cid = 27301336 | title = Dangers of research into chronic fatigue syndrome | journal = BMJ | volume = 342 | pages = d3780 | date = June 2011 | pmid = 21697226 | doi = 10.1136/bmj.d3780 }}</ref> In 2011, ''Lancet'' Editor Richard Horton defended the trial, calling the critics "a fairly small, but highly organized, very vocal and very damaging group of individuals who have, I would say, actually hijacked this agenda and distorted the debate so that it actually harms the overwhelming majority of patients."<ref name="HortoninterviewApr2011">{{Cite web|title=Comparison of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome - the PACE trial|url=https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/healthreport/comparison-of-treatments-for-chronic-fatigue/2993296|date=2011-04-15|website=ABC Radio National|language=en-AU|access-date=2020-05-24|archive-date=12 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191212031323/https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/healthreport/comparison-of-treatments-for-chronic-fatigue/2993296|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Rehmeyer2015">{{cite web | vauthors = Rehmeyer J |title=The Debate Over Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is Suddenly Shifting |url=https://slate.com/technology/2015/11/chronic-fatigue-pace-trial-is-flawed-should-be-reanalyzed.html |website=Slate Magazine |language=en |date=13 November 2015 |access-date=24 May 2020 |archive-date=15 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190815121158/https://slate.com/technology/2015/11/chronic-fatigue-pace-trial-is-flawed-should-be-reanalyzed.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
More recent criticisms of the trial have come from the scientific community. For example, biostatistician Bruce Levin of Columbia University described the study as "the height of clinical trial amateurism", and ] of Stanford University wrote, "I'm shocked that the ''Lancet'' published it... The PACE study has so many flaws and there are so many questions you'd want to ask about it that I don't understand how it got through any kind of peer review".<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.virology.ws/2015/11/13/an-open-letter-to-dr-richard-horton-and-the-lancet/|title=An open letter to Dr. Richard Horton and The Lancet|website=www.virology.ws|date=13 November 2015|access-date=2016-05-02|archive-date=20 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160420063956/http://www.virology.ws/2015/11/13/an-open-letter-to-dr-richard-horton-and-the-lancet/|url-status=live}}</ref> In an analysis of the study's design, the mathematician Professor ] wrote that "There were problems with the study on almost all levels... the flaws in this design were enough to doom its results from the start."<ref>{{cite web | vauthors = Goldin R | title = PACE: The research that sparked a patient rebellion and challenged medicine | work = Sense About Statistics | date = 21 March 2016 | url = http://www.stats.org/pace-research-sparked-patient-rebellion-challenged-medicine/ | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20161221180703/http://www.stats.org/pace-research-sparked-patient-rebellion-challenged-medicine/ | archive-date = 21 December 2016 }}</ref> Professor Jonathan Edwards of University College London (UCL) has written that the PACE trial "is an unblinded trial with subjective outcome measures. That makes it a non-starter in the eyes of any physician or clinical pharmacologist familiar with problems of systematic bias in trial execution."<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Edwards J | title = PACE team response shows a disregard for the principles of science | journal = Journal of Health Psychology | volume = 22 | issue = 9 | pages = 1155–1158 | date = August 2017 | pmid = 28805520 | doi = 10.1177/1359105317700886 | doi-access = free }}</ref> | |||
The full research data for the PACE trial was requested by both patients acting as citizen scientists, and by other researchers but was initially denied until a 2016 tribunal ordered the data be released.<ref name="Blease_2018" /> Several researchers published a re-analysis of the PACE trial data, but drawing the conclusion that the CBT and GET treatments were ''not'' effective and possibly not safe.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Vink M | s2cid = 206713549 | title = PACE trial authors continue to ignore their own null effect | journal = Journal of Health Psychology | volume = 22 | issue = 9 | pages = 1134–1140 | date = August 2017 | pmid = 28805519 | doi = 10.1177/1359105317703785 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="Vink_2018">{{cite journal | vauthors = Vink M, Vink-Niese A | title = Graded exercise therapy for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome is not effective and unsafe. Re-analysis of a Cochrane review | journal = Health Psychology Open | volume = 5 | issue = 2 | pages = 2055102918805187 | date = 2018-10-08 | pmid = 30305916 | pmc = 6176540 | doi = 10.1177/2055102918805187 }}</ref><ref name="Twisk_2009">{{cite journal |vauthors=Twisk FN, Maes M |date=2009 |title=A review on cognitive behavorial therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) in myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) / chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): CBT/GET is not only ineffective and not evidence-based, but also potentially harmful for many patients with ME/CFS |journal=Neuro Endocrinology Letters |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=284–99 |pmid=19855350}}</ref><ref name="Wilshire_2018">{{cite journal | vauthors = Wilshire CE, Kindlon T, Courtney R, Matthees A, Tuller D, Geraghty K, Levin B | title = Rethinking the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome-a reanalysis and evaluation of findings from a recent major trial of graded exercise and CBT | journal = BMC Psychology | volume = 6 | issue = 1 | pages = 6 | date = March 2018 | pmid = 29562932 | pmc = 5863477 | doi = 10.1186/s40359-018-0218-3 | doi-access = free }}</ref> The full PACE trial outcome data showed that the treatments did not result in patients being able to return to work or study,<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Vink M, Vink-Niese F | title = Work Rehabilitation and Medical Retirement for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients. A Review and Appraisal of Diagnostic Strategies | journal = Diagnostics | volume = 9 | issue = 4 | pages = 124 | date = September 2019 | pmid = 31547009 | doi = 10.3390/diagnostics9040124 | pmc = 6963831 | doi-access = free }}</ref> and that they were not able to walk significantly further after treatment.<ref name="Wilshire_2018" /> This new information was one of several factors that lead to the UK deciding to complete a full review and update to its diagnostic and treatment guidelines for ME/CFS.<ref name="Blease_2018" /> The 2021 guidelines no longer include GET or CBT as treatments.<ref name="Vink_2022">{{cite journal | vauthors = Vink M, Vink-Niese A | title = The Updated NICE Guidance Exposed the Serious Flaws in CBT and Graded Exercise Therapy Trials for ME/CFS | journal = Healthcare | volume = 10 | issue = 5 | pages = 898 | date = May 2022 | pmid = 35628033 | pmc = 9141828 | doi = 10.3390/healthcare10050898 | doi-access = free }}</ref> | |||
===Research funding diversions at the CDC=== | |||
In 1998, William Reaves, a director at the ] (CDC), alleged deceptive Congressional testimony was given by officials at the agency concerning CFS research activities conducted by the organization; specifically, funds for programs intended for CFS research were diverted to other projects and not reported. He also stated he was retaliated against by his superior, Brian Mahy, after he reported the irregularities.<ref name="pmid109322062">{{cite journal |vauthors=Dove A |date=August 2000 |title=GAO reports on CFS funding controversy |journal=Nature Medicine |volume=6 |issue=8 |pages=846 |doi=10.1038/78579 |pmid=10932206 |s2cid=1431198 |doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="AP NEWS 19992">{{cite news | vauthors = Mays P |date=1999-07-06 |title=CDC Diverts Chronic Fatigue Funds |url=https://apnews.com/4e784fbacb42ff5f4901e39169d66fba |access-date=2020-06-25 |website=AP NEWS |archive-date=25 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200625213206/https://apnews.com/4e784fbacb42ff5f4901e39169d66fba |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
A ] (GAO) investigation disclosed almost 13 million dollars for CFS research had been redirected or improperly accounted for by the CDC. The agency stated the funds were redistributed in order to respond to other public health emergencies. The director of a U.S. national patient advocacy group charged the CDC had a bias against studying the disease.<ref name="pmid109322062" /> | |||
In response, the CDC pledged reforms to accounting practices to reduce misuse of funds earmarked for specific diseases. Additionally, the money diverted from CFS research was to be restored over a period of three years.<ref name="pmid109322062" />{{Update inline|date=October 2022}} | |||
===Harassment of researchers=== | |||
Researchers have complained of receiving harassment and abuse from activists when working on ME/CFS. While the abuse is primarily directed at researchers looking into psychological aspects of ME/CFS, it has also affected scientists investigating biological mechanisms, such as Myra McClure, who received a "staggeringly shocking" torrent of abuse from patients who believed she had a vested interest in not finding the virus. McClure says that she will not be pursuing any more research into ME/CFS.<ref name="torrent_abuse">{{cite news |last1=Fielden |first1=Tom |title='Torrent of abuse' hindering ME research |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-14326514 |work=BBC News |date=29 July 2011}}</ref> | |||
In 2012, several UK researchers involved in the PACE trial, who adopted the controversial psychosocial perspective, reported to the press that they had been verbally abused by patients, and one reported receiving death threats.<ref name="hawkes"/> A tribunal judge investigated the claims of harassment in relation to the PACE trial. They ruled that the claims of harassment had been "wildly exaggerated by the trial authors and their expert witnesses".<ref name="Blease_2018">{{cite journal | vauthors = Blease C, Geraghty KJ | s2cid = 49677273 | title = Are ME/CFS Patient Organizations "Militant"? : Patient Protest in a Medical Controversy | journal = Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | volume = 15 | issue = 3 | pages = 393–401 | date = September 2018 | pmid = 29971693 | doi = 10.1007/s11673-018-9866-5 }}</ref> Blease and Geragty found "no compelling evidence" the vast majority of ME/CFS patients or their advocacy organizations had adopted "militant political policies or behaviours", and reported ME/CFS activists used public discourse and scientific publications analogous to 1980s "AIDS" activists. They concluded the medical establishment's negative perceptions of persons with ME/CFS, and indifference to patient's opinions conceptualized the ME/CFS community's discontent.<ref name="Blease_2018" /> | |||
==Harms to patients== | |||
=== Harmful treatments === | |||
Reports of medical harm to patients resulting from the use of ] (CBT) as a primary treatment and the use of graded exercise therapy (GET) have arisen.<ref name="Kindlon_2010">{{cite journal | vauthors = Kindlon T, Goudsmit EM | title = Graded exercise for chronic fatigue syndrome: too soon to dismiss reports of adverse reactions | journal = Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine | volume = 42 | issue = 2 | pages = 184; author reply 184–6 | date = February 2010 | pmid = 20140417 | doi = 10.2340/16501977-0493 | url = https://www.researchgate.net/publication/41414922 | access-date = 2020-07-17 | doi-access = free }}</ref><ref name="Vink_2018" /><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Geraghty KJ, Blease C | s2cid = 31832147 | title = Cognitive behavioural therapy in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: A narrative review on efficacy and informed consent | journal = Journal of Health Psychology | volume = 23 | issue = 1 | pages = 127–138 | date = January 2018 | pmid = 27634687 | doi = 10.1177/1359105316667798 | url = https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/cognitive-behavioural-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-a-narrative-review-on-efficacy-and-informed-consent(987590d0-a62d-473e-8d46-b74b9247e81c).html | access-date = 25 August 2021 | archive-date = 27 August 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20210827121750/https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/cognitive-behavioural-therapy-in-the-treatment-of-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-a-narrative-review-on-efficacy-and-informed-consent(987590d0-a62d-473e-8d46-b74b9247e81c).html | url-status = live }}</ref> A controversial clinical trial of the ] in children,<ref name="Coyne_2017">{{Cite web| vauthors = Coyne JC |date=2017-09-27|title=Parents should have been warned about unprofessional providers in Esther Crawley's SMILE trial|url=https://www.coyneoftherealm.com/2017/09/27/parents-should-have-been-warned-about-unprofessional-providers-in-esther-crawleys-smile-trial/|access-date=2020-07-18|website=Coyne of the Realm|language=en-US|archive-date=18 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200718043520/https://www.coyneoftherealm.com/2017/09/27/parents-should-have-been-warned-about-unprofessional-providers-in-esther-crawleys-smile-trial/|url-status=live}}</ref> led to it being specifically forbidden in the NICE guidelines.<ref name="www.nice.org.uk_2021" /><ref name="Coyne_2017" /> A number of publications by Esther Crawley promoting GET have been corrected due to inaccurate ethics statements.<ref name="Tuller_2019">{{Cite web | vauthors = Tuller D |date=2019-12-13 |title=BMJ should retract flawed paper on chronic fatigue syndrome |url=https://www.statnews.com/2019/12/13/bmj-should-retract-flawed-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-research-paper/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201028122107/https://www.statnews.com/2019/12/13/bmj-should-retract-flawed-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-research-paper/ |archive-date=28 October 2020 |access-date=2020-07-18 |website=STAT |language=en-US |quote=Unfortunately for BMJ, in addition to the mess over the Lightning Process study, Crawley was also directed earlier this year to correct the ethics statements in eleven other published papers – five of them in BMJ journals.}}</ref> | |||
=== Deaths and suicide === | |||
Studies show medical neglect, trivialisation, and psychologization have contributed to increased risk of suicide in patients suffering from ME/CFS.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = König RS, Paris DH, Sollberger M, Tschopp R | title = Identifying the mental health burden in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) patients in Switzerland: A pilot study | journal = Heliyon | volume = 10 | issue = 5 | pages = e27031 | date = March 2024 | pmid = 38434357 | pmc = 10907781 | doi = 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27031 | doi-access = free | bibcode = 2024Heliy..1027031K }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Chu L, Elliott M, Stein E, Jason LA | title = Identifying and Managing Suicidality in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome | journal = Healthcare | volume = 9 | issue = 6 | pages = 629 | date = May 2021 | pmid = 34070367 | pmc = 8227525 | doi = 10.3390/healthcare9060629 | doi-access = free }}</ref> In some severe cases, neglect by clinicians has led to complications of the disease which ultimately led to the death of the patient.<ref name="Sandeman_2022">{{Cite news | vauthors = Sandeman G |date=2022-09-22 |title=Chronic fatigue syndrome patient told: 'You're making it up' |newspaper=] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-patient-coroner-inquest-5z8vsxbjq |access-date=2024-04-14 |language=en |issn=0140-0460 |archive-date=9 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231209050716/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-patient-coroner-inquest-5z8vsxbjq |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2013-06-23 |title=Emily didn't 'only' have ME |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/10137694/Emily-didnt-only-have-ME.html |access-date=2024-04-14 |website=The Telegraph |language=en |archive-date=8 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231208171625/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/10137694/Emily-didnt-only-have-ME.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Irish Independent_2010" /> Some patients with severe and very severe ME/CFS are unable to swallow or ],<ref name="www.nice.org.uk_2021">{{Cite web |date=2021-10-29 |title=Overview {{!}} Myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy)/chronic fatigue syndrome: diagnosis and management {{!}} Guidance {{!}} NICE |url=https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng206 |access-date=2024-04-14 |website=www.nice.org.uk |archive-date=4 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221204125815/https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng206 |url-status=live }}</ref> when this is neglected or misdiagnosed as a psychological condition (such as ]), malnutrition can follow, with a risk of death.<ref name="Baxter_2021">{{cite journal | vauthors = Baxter H, Speight N, Weir W | title = Life-Threatening Malnutrition in Very Severe ME/CFS | journal = Healthcare | volume = 9 | issue = 4 | pages = 459 | date = April 2021 | pmid = 33919671 | pmc = 8070213 | doi = 10.3390/healthcare9040459 | doi-access = free }}</ref> Proper care for patients with severe feeding problems stipulates ] for short term cases and using ] for long term cases.<ref name="Baxter_2021" /> | |||
A notable case is that of Maeve Boothby O’Neill, a 27-year-old woman who died from very severe ME/CFS in 2021. As her condition gradually worsened, she became too unwell to properly feed and hydrate herself. At first the NHS doctors gave her feeding aids, but insisted upon feeding her much more than her body could handle which exacerbated her condition through ]. The only feasible option left was total parenteral nutrition, but due to the doctor's belief that her condition was largely psychological, they refused this route. A month later, she died of malnutrition.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-12-19 |title=Daughter's death 'could have been avoided' |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-devon-67748453 |access-date=2024-04-14 |website=BBC News |language=en-GB |archive-date=21 March 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240321005037/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-devon-67748453 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web | vauthors = Tuller D |date=2023-01-27 |title=When the doctor doesn't listen |url=https://www.codastory.com/waronscience/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-long-covid-unexplained-symptoms/ |access-date=2024-04-14 |website=Coda Story |language=en-US |archive-date=28 December 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231228125259/https://www.codastory.com/waronscience/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-long-covid-unexplained-symptoms/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Sandeman_2022" /> An inquest into Maeve Boothby O’Neill’s death was opened by the Exeter and Devon Coroners, and is currently ongoing. Dr. Anthony Hemsley, the director of the ], has testified that the ] has no policy and no facilities for treating severe (housebound) or very severe (bedbound) patients anywhere in the United Kingdom.<ref>{{Cite news | vauthors = Humphries W |date=2024-04-14 |title=Hospitals have no services for most severe ME cases, coroner told |newspaper=] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hospitals-have-no-services-for-most-severe-me-cases-coroner-told-j3q7v7k9p |access-date=2024-04-14 |language=en |issn=0140-0460 |archive-date=30 January 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240130091411/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hospitals-have-no-services-for-most-severe-me-cases-coroner-told-j3q7v7k9p |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Misdiagnosis, under-diagnosis, and delays in diagnosis=== | |||
Because of a lack of awareness and education about ME/CFS in the medical community delays in diagnosis and misdiagnosis are common.<ref name="www.nice.org.uk_2021" /><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Bateman L, Bested AC, Bonilla HF, Chheda BV, Chu L, Curtin JM, Dempsey TT, Dimmock ME, Dowell TG, Felsenstein D, Kaufman DL, Klimas NG, Komaroff AL, Lapp CW, Levine SM, Montoya JG, Natelson BH, Peterson DL, Podell RN, Rey IR, Ruhoy IS, Vera-Nunez MA, Yellman BP | title = Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Essentials of Diagnosis and Management | journal = Mayo Clinic Proceedings | volume = 96 | issue = 11 | pages = 2861–2878 | date = November 2021 | pmid = 34454716 | doi = 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.07.004 | doi-access = free }}</ref> A large proportion of ME/CFS patients are undiagnosed; its true prevalence is therefore unknown.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Araja D, Berkis U, Lunga A, Murovska M | title = Shadow Burden of Undiagnosed Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) on Society: Retrospective and Prospective-In Light of COVID-19 | journal = Journal of Clinical Medicine | volume = 10 | issue = 14 | pages = 3017 | date = July 2021 | pmid = 34300183 | pmc = 8303374 | doi = 10.3390/jcm10143017 | doi-access = free }}</ref> ME/CFS patients can be misdiagnosed with a wide variety of conditions, common ones include psychosomatic disease, depression, burnout, and neuresthenia.<ref name="Tschopp_2023" /> It is common for diagnosis to take over 5 years post disease onset, and visits to a large number of medical professionals.<ref name="Institute of Medicine._2015">{{cite report | author1 = Committee on the Diagnostic Criteria for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome | author2 = Board on the Health of Select Populations | author3 = Institute of Medicine. | title = Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness. | location = Washington (DC) | publisher = National Academies Press (US) | date = February 2015 | pmid = 25695122 | url = https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK274235/ }}</ref><ref name="Tschopp_2023" /><ref>Arild Angelsen and Trude Schei. 2024. EMEA survey of ME/CFS patients in Europe: Same disease, different approaches and experiences.</ref> | |||
=== Involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation === | |||
There have been reported cases of forced psychiatric hospitalisation of ME/CFS patients.<ref name="Irish Independent_2010">{{Cite web |date=2010-03-08 |title=Real life: The long goodbye |url=https://www.independent.ie/life/health-wellbeing/real-life-the-long-goodbye/26638944.html |access-date=2024-04-15 |website=Irish Independent |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Karina Hansen is Finally Home (sort of...) |url=https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/10/26/1587112/-Karina-Hansen-is-Finally-Home-sort-of |access-date=2024-04-15 |website=Daily Kos |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-04-12 |title=Family push for daughter's removal from hospital |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lancashire-68791397 |access-date=2024-04-15 |website=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref> In these cases clinicians wrongly assumed ME/CFS was of psychological origin, or misdiagnosed a mental illness. | |||
A notable case is that of ]. Mirza was forcibly removed from her home and ] for two weeks by her doctors, who had come to believe her condition was ], an action which her mother and sister said severely worsened her condition, through ]. Her health deteriorated after being released from the psychiatric unit, and two years later she died.<ref name="Irish Independent_2010" /><ref>{{Cite news |title=I never imagined my sister would die |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/i-never-imagined-my-sister-would-die-1.450619 |access-date=2024-04-15 |newspaper=The Irish Times |language=en}}</ref> An inquest into her death revealed it to be due to ] due to dehydration as a result of chronic fatigue syndrome.<ref>{{Cite web | vauthors = Hooper R |title=First official UK death from chronic fatigue syndrome |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9342-first-official-uk-death-from-chronic-fatigue-syndrome/ |access-date=2024-04-15 |website=New Scientist |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
==Naming== | |||
There has been much historical debate over whether to use the term ''Myalgic Encephalomyelitis'' or ''Chronic Fatigue Syndrome'' to describe the disease, therefore, the compromise ''Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome'' is often used. | |||
The term ''chronic fatigue syndrome'' is criticised for focusing on a single symptom, while its use has lead many to confuse ME/CFS with general ]. The term “fatigue” trivialises the illness and discourages research into potential treatments.<ref name="cfsyuppie">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/ref/health/healthguide/esn-chronicfatigue-ess.html|title=Chronic Fatigue Syndrome No Longer Seen as 'Yuppie Flu'|vauthors=Tuller D|date=17 July 2007|work=The New York Times|access-date=15 June 2009|archive-date=17 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150317132227/http://www.nytimes.com/ref/health/healthguide/esn-chronicfatigue-ess.html|url-status=live}}</ref> According to a survey of medical trainees at a school in the United States, a condition described as "chronic fatigue syndrome" is considered less serious than a condition described as "myalgic encephalopathy".<ref name="pmid11928774">{{cite journal |vauthors=Jason LA, Taylor RR, Plioplys S, Stepanek Z, Shlaes J| s2cid = 27350772 | title = Evaluating attributions for an illness based upon the name: chronic fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalopathy and Florence Nightingale disease | journal=Am J Community Psychol | volume = 30 | issue = 1 | pages = 133–48 | year = 2002 | pmid = 11928774 | doi = 10.1023/A:1014328319297}}</ref><ref name="Tuller_2015">{{Cite web | vauthors = Tuller D |date=2015-02-10 |title=Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Gets a New Name |url=https://archive.nytimes.com/well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/02/10/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-gets-a-new-name/ |access-date=2024-04-25 |website=Well |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The term ''myalgic encephalomyelitis'' has also been criticised, as the symptom ] (muscle pain) is not experienced by everyone with the disease. Additionally, before ME/CFS was considered a biological condition, the name ME was seen as reinforcing the illness as it “legitimised” patient’s symptoms.<ref name="Tuller_2015" /> | |||
In 2015 the National Academy of Medicine recommended changing the name to Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (SEID) in their report "Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness"'. However, this new name was not widely adopted.<ref name="Institute of Medicine._2015" /> | |||
==Disability compensation== | |||
Despite being a disabling condition that leaves around 75% of patients unable to work, people with ME/CFS are often dismissed when applying for disability compensation.<ref name="Institute of Medicine._2015" /><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Podell R, Dimmock ME, Comerford BB | title = Documenting disability in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) | journal = Work | volume = 66 | issue = 2 | pages = 339–352 | date = 2020-07-20 | pmid = 32568153 | doi = 10.3233/WOR-203178 | veditors = Mooney A }}</ref> | |||
=== UK psychosocial controversy === | |||
Despite being classified as a biological illness by national health bodies, the Department for Work and Pensions classifies ME/CFS as a psychosocial illness, which means sufferers are entitled to lower benefits. A 2006 report by the UK Parliamentary Group on Scientific Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis stated that: "CFS/ME is defined as a psychosocial illness by the ] (DWP) and medical insurance companies. Therefore, claimants are not entitled to the higher level of benefit payments. We recognise that if CFS/ME remains as one illness and/or both remain defined as psychosocial then it would be in the financial interest of both the DWP and the medical insurance companies." The Group called for investigation of what they called, "numerous cases where advisors to the DWP have also had consultancy roles in medical insurance companies. Particularly the Company ]. Given the vested interest private medical insurance companies have in ensuring CFS/ME remain classified as a psychosocial illness there is blatant conflict of interest here." | |||
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions responded that "Entitlement to Disability Living Allowance depends on the effects that severe physical or mental disability has on a person's need for personal care and/or their ability to walk, and not on particular disabilities or diagnoses. The benefit is available to people with myalgic encephalomyelitis (which can have a physical basis or a psychological basis, or can be due to a combination of factors) on exactly the same terms as other severely disabled people, and they can qualify for it provided that they meet the usual entitlement conditions."<ref>{{cite web | publisher = United Kingdom Parliamentary Group on Scientific Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis | title = Inquiry into the status of CFS/ME and research into causes and treatment | date = 1 November 2006 | url = http://erythos.com/gibsonenquiry/Report.html | access-date = 25 June 2010 | archive-date = 24 June 2010 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100624004640/http://erythos.com/gibsonenquiry/Report.html | url-status = live }}</ref> This runs contrary to current scientific evidence which shows ME/CFS is "unambiguously biological". <ref>{{cite web | publisher = Science Alert | title = Landmark Study Confirms Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is 'Unambiguously Biological' | date = 24 March 2024 | url = https://www.sciencealert.com/landmark-study-confirms-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-is-unambiguously-biological | access-date = 13 April 2024 | archive-date = 4 April 2024 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20240404013825/https://www.sciencealert.com/landmark-study-confirms-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-is-unambiguously-biological | url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist |
{{reflist}} | ||
==Further reading== | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
* {{cite book | title = Osler's Web: Inside the Labyrinth of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Epidemic | publisher=Crown Publishers, New York | year = 1996 | isbn = 978-0-517-70353-3 | vauthors = Johnson H }} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
{{chronic fatigue syndrome}} | {{chronic fatigue syndrome}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 22:29, 25 November 2024
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is an illness with a history of controversy. Although it is classified as an organic disease by a majority of researchers, it was historically assumed to be psychosocial, an opinion still held among many physicians. The pathophysiology of ME/CFS remains unclear, there exist many competing diagnostic criteria, and some proposed treatments are controversial. There is a lack of education and accurate information about the condition among a significant number of medical practitioners, which has led to substantiated accusations of patient neglect and harm.
Neglect and lack of awareness
ME/CFS suffers from a lack of awareness among clinical professionals. Despite being a relatively common and disabling disease, a large proportion of professionals are either unaware or dismissive of it. This often leads to patient neglect, which happens in clinical, government, bureaucratic, and research settings.
Lack of awareness in clinical settings
Despite ample evidence that ME/CFS is an organic disease, many clinicians do not recognise it as genuine or underestimate its seriousness. A 2020 literature review found that “a third to a half of all GPs did not accept ME/CFS as a genuine clinical entity and, even when they did, they lacked confidence in diagnosing or managing it.”
A substantial proportion of medical schools do not teach about ME/CFS, and the large majority do not provide clinical exposure to ME/CFS patients. In 2021, the UK NICE found that “medical students reported that there is little or no formal training on ME/CFS in the medical curriculum and that their knowledge often comes from media”.
Training influences attitudes towards ME/CFS. One study conducted a relatively brief seminar presenting factual information on the illness to a cohort of fourth year medical students. The authors concluded the information provided was associated with a more favorable attitude toward ME/CFS.
Neglect of patients
Governments, medical institutions, and the medical community have been criticised for neglecting people with ME/CFS. George Monbiot, a journalist for the Guardian, called the neglect and its consequences “the greatest medical scandal of the 21st century”. Individuals with the condition describe the struggle for healthcare and legitimacy due to what is described as bureaucratic denial of the condition because of its lack of a known etiology. Institutions maintain the exclusion of patient support by rhetorical arguments of the open-endedness of science to delay new findings of fact.
A 2006 investigation by a group from the Parliament of the United Kingdom found there was not enough support in the UK for CFS patients in terms of access to government benefits and health care.
Mass hysteria accusations
Epidemic cases of myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) were called mass hysteria by psychiatrists McEvedy and Beard in 1970, provoking criticism in letters to the editor of the British Medical Journal by attending physicians, researchers, and nurses who fell ill.
The psychiatrists were criticized for not investigating the patients they described, and their conclusions have been refuted. In 1978 a symposium held at the Royal Society of Medicine (RSM) concluded that epidemic myalgic encephalomyelitis was a distinct disease entity.
However, the idea that CFS may be culturally mediated persisted in some quarters. In her 1997 book Hystories: Hysterical Epidemics and Modern Culture, literary critic and feminist Elaine Showalter argues that chronic fatigue syndrome is a "hysterical narrative", a modern manifestation of hysteria, a self-perpetuating "cultural symptom of anxiety and stress" historically assigned to women.
Research related
Lack of funding
Governments and health organisations have been criticised for their lack of funding into ME/CFS research. ME/CFS is one of the most underfunded diseases compared to disease burden. The funds are only approximately 3-7% of what comparable diseases are allocated. Meanwhile the economic impact of ME/CFS is estimated at 149-362 billion USD in the United States alone.
XMRV retrovirus
Main article: Judy Mikovits § XMRV and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndromeIn 2009, the journal Science published a study that identified the XMRV retrovirus in blood samples of a population of people with CFS. After the Science publication, media attention generated interest in the XMRV virus worldwide.
Many countries reacted quickly to protect the blood supply from the XMRV retrovirus by banning persons with CFS from donating blood. The United States funded a 1.3 million dollar study to try to validate the findings, and some people with the illness started taking antiviral drugs in hopes of symptomatic improvement. Organizations adopting these or similar measures included the Canadian Blood Services, the New Zealand Blood Service, the Australian Red Cross Blood Service and the American Association of Blood Banks. In November 2010, the UK National Blood Service permanently deferred ME/CFS patients from donating blood to prevent potential harm to the donor.
Many studies failed to reproduce this finding, and recriminations of misconduct from the various stakeholders grew angry and bitter.
In 2011, the editor of Science formally retracted its XMRV paper while the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences similarly retracted a 2010 paper which had appeared to support the finding of a connection between XMRV and CFS. Studies eventually concluded that neither people nor the blood supply had been infected with the XMRV virus, and the origin of the virus was likely a lab contaminant in the supplies used by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process of the studies that found virus in blood.
PACE trial
Main article: PACE trialPACE was a large trial investigating the efficacy and safety of three treatments adjunctive to specialist medical care (SMC): cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), graded exercise therapy (GET), and adaptive pacing therapy (APT). The results were published in February 2011 and concluded that CBT and GET were each "moderately" effective compared to SMC alone, while APT was not found to be effective when added to SMC.
The trial generated considerable criticism. Letters to the editor critiqued the definitions of secondary outcomes, questioned post-hoc protocol changes, and expressed concern over generalisability of the results. Patient groups and the IACFS/ME (an organization of researchers and health care professionals interested in CFS) criticized the trial for over-simplified and exaggerated conclusions, for using a flawed psychosocial illness model that ignores biological evidence, for testing a non-representative version of pacing, and because the results seriously conflict with their member surveys which show that pacing is effective and CBT or GET can cause deterioration in many patients who use the treatments.
One researcher submitted a 442-page letter to the Medical Research Council outlining his criticisms of the trial, and a shorter 43-page complaint to the Lancet. The MRC and the Lancet rejected the submissions. A Lancet editorial responded to the adverse criticism by suggesting that some critics could be part of "an active campaign to discredit the research." In 2011, Lancet Editor Richard Horton defended the trial, calling the critics "a fairly small, but highly organized, very vocal and very damaging group of individuals who have, I would say, actually hijacked this agenda and distorted the debate so that it actually harms the overwhelming majority of patients."
More recent criticisms of the trial have come from the scientific community. For example, biostatistician Bruce Levin of Columbia University described the study as "the height of clinical trial amateurism", and Ronald Davis of Stanford University wrote, "I'm shocked that the Lancet published it... The PACE study has so many flaws and there are so many questions you'd want to ask about it that I don't understand how it got through any kind of peer review". In an analysis of the study's design, the mathematician Professor Rebecca Goldin wrote that "There were problems with the study on almost all levels... the flaws in this design were enough to doom its results from the start." Professor Jonathan Edwards of University College London (UCL) has written that the PACE trial "is an unblinded trial with subjective outcome measures. That makes it a non-starter in the eyes of any physician or clinical pharmacologist familiar with problems of systematic bias in trial execution."
The full research data for the PACE trial was requested by both patients acting as citizen scientists, and by other researchers but was initially denied until a 2016 tribunal ordered the data be released. Several researchers published a re-analysis of the PACE trial data, but drawing the conclusion that the CBT and GET treatments were not effective and possibly not safe. The full PACE trial outcome data showed that the treatments did not result in patients being able to return to work or study, and that they were not able to walk significantly further after treatment. This new information was one of several factors that lead to the UK deciding to complete a full review and update to its diagnostic and treatment guidelines for ME/CFS. The 2021 guidelines no longer include GET or CBT as treatments.
Research funding diversions at the CDC
In 1998, William Reaves, a director at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), alleged deceptive Congressional testimony was given by officials at the agency concerning CFS research activities conducted by the organization; specifically, funds for programs intended for CFS research were diverted to other projects and not reported. He also stated he was retaliated against by his superior, Brian Mahy, after he reported the irregularities.
A Government Accounting Office (GAO) investigation disclosed almost 13 million dollars for CFS research had been redirected or improperly accounted for by the CDC. The agency stated the funds were redistributed in order to respond to other public health emergencies. The director of a U.S. national patient advocacy group charged the CDC had a bias against studying the disease.
In response, the CDC pledged reforms to accounting practices to reduce misuse of funds earmarked for specific diseases. Additionally, the money diverted from CFS research was to be restored over a period of three years.
Harassment of researchers
Researchers have complained of receiving harassment and abuse from activists when working on ME/CFS. While the abuse is primarily directed at researchers looking into psychological aspects of ME/CFS, it has also affected scientists investigating biological mechanisms, such as Myra McClure, who received a "staggeringly shocking" torrent of abuse from patients who believed she had a vested interest in not finding the virus. McClure says that she will not be pursuing any more research into ME/CFS.
In 2012, several UK researchers involved in the PACE trial, who adopted the controversial psychosocial perspective, reported to the press that they had been verbally abused by patients, and one reported receiving death threats. A tribunal judge investigated the claims of harassment in relation to the PACE trial. They ruled that the claims of harassment had been "wildly exaggerated by the trial authors and their expert witnesses". Blease and Geragty found "no compelling evidence" the vast majority of ME/CFS patients or their advocacy organizations had adopted "militant political policies or behaviours", and reported ME/CFS activists used public discourse and scientific publications analogous to 1980s "AIDS" activists. They concluded the medical establishment's negative perceptions of persons with ME/CFS, and indifference to patient's opinions conceptualized the ME/CFS community's discontent.
Harms to patients
Harmful treatments
Reports of medical harm to patients resulting from the use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as a primary treatment and the use of graded exercise therapy (GET) have arisen. A controversial clinical trial of the Lightning Process in children, led to it being specifically forbidden in the NICE guidelines. A number of publications by Esther Crawley promoting GET have been corrected due to inaccurate ethics statements.
Deaths and suicide
Studies show medical neglect, trivialisation, and psychologization have contributed to increased risk of suicide in patients suffering from ME/CFS. In some severe cases, neglect by clinicians has led to complications of the disease which ultimately led to the death of the patient. Some patients with severe and very severe ME/CFS are unable to swallow or properly digest, when this is neglected or misdiagnosed as a psychological condition (such as anorexia nervosa), malnutrition can follow, with a risk of death. Proper care for patients with severe feeding problems stipulates total parenteral nutrition for short term cases and using feeding tubes for long term cases.
A notable case is that of Maeve Boothby O’Neill, a 27-year-old woman who died from very severe ME/CFS in 2021. As her condition gradually worsened, she became too unwell to properly feed and hydrate herself. At first the NHS doctors gave her feeding aids, but insisted upon feeding her much more than her body could handle which exacerbated her condition through post-exertional malaise. The only feasible option left was total parenteral nutrition, but due to the doctor's belief that her condition was largely psychological, they refused this route. A month later, she died of malnutrition. An inquest into Maeve Boothby O’Neill’s death was opened by the Exeter and Devon Coroners, and is currently ongoing. Dr. Anthony Hemsley, the director of the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, has testified that the NHS has no policy and no facilities for treating severe (housebound) or very severe (bedbound) patients anywhere in the United Kingdom.
Misdiagnosis, under-diagnosis, and delays in diagnosis
Because of a lack of awareness and education about ME/CFS in the medical community delays in diagnosis and misdiagnosis are common. A large proportion of ME/CFS patients are undiagnosed; its true prevalence is therefore unknown. ME/CFS patients can be misdiagnosed with a wide variety of conditions, common ones include psychosomatic disease, depression, burnout, and neuresthenia. It is common for diagnosis to take over 5 years post disease onset, and visits to a large number of medical professionals.
Involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation
There have been reported cases of forced psychiatric hospitalisation of ME/CFS patients. In these cases clinicians wrongly assumed ME/CFS was of psychological origin, or misdiagnosed a mental illness.
A notable case is that of Sophia Mirza. Mirza was forcibly removed from her home and sectioned for two weeks by her doctors, who had come to believe her condition was psychosomatic, an action which her mother and sister said severely worsened her condition, through post exertional malaise. Her health deteriorated after being released from the psychiatric unit, and two years later she died. An inquest into her death revealed it to be due to renal failure due to dehydration as a result of chronic fatigue syndrome.
Naming
There has been much historical debate over whether to use the term Myalgic Encephalomyelitis or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome to describe the disease, therefore, the compromise Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome is often used.
The term chronic fatigue syndrome is criticised for focusing on a single symptom, while its use has lead many to confuse ME/CFS with general chronic fatigue. The term “fatigue” trivialises the illness and discourages research into potential treatments. According to a survey of medical trainees at a school in the United States, a condition described as "chronic fatigue syndrome" is considered less serious than a condition described as "myalgic encephalopathy".
The term myalgic encephalomyelitis has also been criticised, as the symptom myalgia (muscle pain) is not experienced by everyone with the disease. Additionally, before ME/CFS was considered a biological condition, the name ME was seen as reinforcing the illness as it “legitimised” patient’s symptoms.
In 2015 the National Academy of Medicine recommended changing the name to Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease (SEID) in their report "Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness"'. However, this new name was not widely adopted.
Disability compensation
Despite being a disabling condition that leaves around 75% of patients unable to work, people with ME/CFS are often dismissed when applying for disability compensation.
UK psychosocial controversy
Despite being classified as a biological illness by national health bodies, the Department for Work and Pensions classifies ME/CFS as a psychosocial illness, which means sufferers are entitled to lower benefits. A 2006 report by the UK Parliamentary Group on Scientific Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis stated that: "CFS/ME is defined as a psychosocial illness by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and medical insurance companies. Therefore, claimants are not entitled to the higher level of benefit payments. We recognise that if CFS/ME remains as one illness and/or both remain defined as psychosocial then it would be in the financial interest of both the DWP and the medical insurance companies." The Group called for investigation of what they called, "numerous cases where advisors to the DWP have also had consultancy roles in medical insurance companies. Particularly the Company UNUMProvident. Given the vested interest private medical insurance companies have in ensuring CFS/ME remain classified as a psychosocial illness there is blatant conflict of interest here."
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions responded that "Entitlement to Disability Living Allowance depends on the effects that severe physical or mental disability has on a person's need for personal care and/or their ability to walk, and not on particular disabilities or diagnoses. The benefit is available to people with myalgic encephalomyelitis (which can have a physical basis or a psychological basis, or can be due to a combination of factors) on exactly the same terms as other severely disabled people, and they can qualify for it provided that they meet the usual entitlement conditions." This runs contrary to current scientific evidence which shows ME/CFS is "unambiguously biological".
References
- ^ Thoma M, Froehlich L, Hattesohl DB, Quante S, Jason LA, Scheibenbogen C (December 2023). "Why the Psychosomatic View on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is Inconsistent with Current Evidence and Harmful to Patients". Medicina. 60 (1): 83. doi:10.3390/medicina60010083. PMC 10819994. PMID 38256344.
- Hooge J (1992). "Chronic fatigue syndrome: cause, controversy and care". British Journal of Nursing. 1 (9): 440–1, 443, 445–6. doi:10.12968/bjon.1992.1.9.440. PMID 1446147.
- ^ Baxter H, Speight N, Weir W (April 2021). "Life-Threatening Malnutrition in Very Severe ME/CFS". Healthcare. 9 (4): 459. doi:10.3390/healthcare9040459. PMC 8070213. PMID 33919671.
- ^ Pheby DF, Araja D, Berkis U, Brenna E, Cullinan J, de Korwin JD, et al. (December 2020). "A Literature Review of GP Knowledge and Understanding of ME/CFS: A Report from the Socioeconomic Working Group of the European Network on ME/CFS (EUROMENE)". Medicina. 57 (1): 7. doi:10.3390/medicina57010007. PMC 7823627. PMID 33374291.
- ^ Monbiot G (12 March 2024). "'You don't want to get better': the outdated treatment of ME/CFS patients is a national scandal". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 4 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
- Jason LA, Richman JA, Friedberg F, Wagner L, Taylor R, Jordan KM (September 1997). "Politics, science, and the emergence of a new disease. The case of chronic fatigue syndrome". The American Psychologist. 52 (9): 973–983. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.9.973. PMID 9301342.
- Muirhead N, Muirhead J, Lavery G, Marsh B (May 2021). "Medical School Education on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis". Medicina. 57 (6): 542. doi:10.3390/medicina57060542. PMC 8230290. PMID 34071264.
- "Myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy) / chronic fatigue syndrome: diagnosis and management [B] Information, education and support for health and social care professionals". National Institute for Care and Excellence. October 2021.
NICE guideline NG206, Evidence reviews underpinning recommendations and research, recommendations in the NICE guideline
- Friedberg F, Sohl SJ, Halperin PJ (May 2008). "Teaching medical students about medically unexplained illnesses: A preliminary study". Med Teach. 30 (6): 618–21. doi:10.1080/01421590801946970. PMID 18608944. S2CID 23465440.
- ^ "Overview | Myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy)/chronic fatigue syndrome: diagnosis and management | Guidance | NICE". www.nice.org.uk. 29 October 2021. Archived from the original on 4 December 2022. Retrieved 14 April 2024.
- ^ Tschopp R, König RS, Rejmer P, Paris DH (August 2023). "Health system support among patients with ME/CFS in Switzerland". Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 18 (4): 876–885. doi:10.1016/j.jtumed.2022.12.019. PMC 9957780. PMID 36852237. Archived from the original on 15 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
- Chowdhury S (23 May 2023). "Freedom of Information Findings Report" (PDF). Action for ME. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
- Mounstephen A, Sharpe M (May 1997). "Chronic fatigue syndrome and occupational health". Occupational Medicine. 47 (4): 217–227. doi:10.1093/occmed/47.4.217. PMID 9231495.
- Dumit J (February 2006). "Illnesses you have to fight to get: facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses". Social Science & Medicine. 62 (3): 577–590. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.018. PMID 16085344.
- Gibson I (February 2007). "A new look at chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis". Journal of Clinical Pathology. 60 (2): 120–1. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.042432. PMC 1860614. PMID 16935965.
- McEvedy CP, Beard AW (January 1970). "Concept of benign myalgic encephalomyelitis". British Medical Journal. 1 (5687): 11–5. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5687.11. PMC 1700895. PMID 5411596.
- Scott BD (January 1970). "Epidemic malaise". British Medical Journal. 1 (5689): 170. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.111.170. PMC 1699088. PMID 5370039.
- Compston ND, Dimsdale HE, Ramsay AM, Richardson AT (February 1970). "Epidemic Malaise". British Medical Journal. 1 (5692): 362–363. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5692.362-a. PMC 1699022.
- Acheson ED (February 1970). "Epidemic Malaise". British Medical Journal. 1 (5692): 363–4. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5692.363-b. PMC 1698971.
- Gosling PH (February 1970). "Epidemic malaise". British Medical Journal. 1 (5694): 499–500. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5694.499-b. PMC 1699452. PMID 5435167.
- Purke GJ (February 1970). "Epidemic malaise". British Medical Journal. 1 (5694): 500. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5694.500. PMC 1699458. PMID 5435168.
- Hopkins EJ (February 1970). "Epidemic malaise". British Medical Journal. 1 (5694): 500–1. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5694.500-a. PMC 1699426. PMID 5435169.
- Galpine JF (February 1970). "Epidemic malaise". British Medical Journal. 1 (5694): 501. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5694.501. PMC 1699416. PMID 5435170.
- Poskanzer DC (May 1970). "Epidemic malaise". British Medical Journal. 2 (5706): 420–1. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5706.420-b. PMC 1700311. PMID 5420612.
- Parish JG (July 1970). "Epidemic malaise". British Medical Journal. 3 (5713): 47–8. doi:10.1136/bmj.3.5713.47-c. PMC 1700986. PMID 4316803.
- Hooper M (May 2007). "Myalgic encephalomyelitis: a review with emphasis on key findings in biomedical research". Journal of Clinical Pathology. 60 (5): 466–71. doi:10.1136/jcp.2006.042408. PMC 1994528. PMID 16935967.
- Evengård B, Schacterle RS, Komaroff AL (November 1999). "Chronic fatigue syndrome: new insights and old ignorance". Journal of Internal Medicine. 246 (5): 455–69. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00513.x. PMID 10583715. S2CID 34123925.
- David AS, Wessely S, Pelosi AJ (March 1988). "Postviral fatigue syndrome: time for a new approach". British Medical Journal. 296 (6623): 696–9. doi:10.1136/bmj.296.6623.696. PMC 2545306. PMID 3128374.
- Stricklin A, Sewell M, Austad C (January 1990). "Objective measurement of personality variables in epidemic neuromyasthenia patients". South African Medical Journal = Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Geneeskunde. 77 (1): 31–4. PMID 2294610.
- No authors listed (June 1978). "Epidemic myalgic encephalomyelitis". British Medical Journal. 1 (6125): 1436–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.2791.1436-a. PMC 1604957. PMID 647324.
- Showalter E (1997). Hystories: hysterical epidemics and modern media. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 132. ISBN 978-0-231-10459-3.
- ^ Mirin AA, Dimmock ME, Jason LA (20 July 2020). Mooney A (ed.). "Research update: The relation between ME/CFS disease burden and research funding in the USA". Work. 66 (2): 277–282. doi:10.3233/WOR-203173. PMID 32568148.
- ^ Mirin AA, Dimmock ME, Jason LA (3 April 2022). "Updated ME/CFS prevalence estimates reflecting post-COVID increases and associated economic costs and funding implications". Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior. 10 (2): 83–93. doi:10.1080/21641846.2022.2062169. ISSN 2164-1846.
- Lombardi VC, Ruscetti FW, Das Gupta J, Pfost MA, Hagen KS, Peterson DL, et al. (October 2009). "Detection of an infectious retrovirus, XMRV, in blood cells of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome". Science. 326 (5952): 585–9. Bibcode:2009Sci...326..585L. doi:10.1126/science.1179052. PMC 3073172. PMID 19815723. (Retracted, see doi:10.1126/science.334.6063.1636-a, PMID 22194552, Retraction Watch)
- ^ Callaway E (March 2011). "Virology: Fighting for a cause". Nature. 471 (7338): 282–5. Bibcode:2011Natur.471..282C. doi:10.1038/471282a. PMID 21412308. S2CID 1416235.
- "No blood from chronic fatigue donors: agency". CBC. 7 April 2010. Archived from the original on 11 April 2010. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
- Atkinson K (21 April 2010). "Chronic Fatigue Set To Disqualify Blood Donors". Voxy.co.nz. Archived from the original on 24 April 2010. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
- "Blood Service updates CFS donor policy". Australian Red Cross Blood Service. Archived from the original on 14 October 2013. Retrieved 7 July 2013.
- "Recommendation on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Blood Donation". American Association of Blood Banks. 18 June 2010. Archived from the original on 25 June 2010. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
- NHS Blood and Transplant (5 November 2010). "ME/CFS sufferers permanently deferred from giving blood". Archived from the original on 28 November 2015. Retrieved 9 October 2011.
- Erlwein O, Kaye S, McClure MO, Weber J, Wills G, Collier D, et al. (January 2010). Nixon DF (ed.). "Failure to detect the novel retrovirus XMRV in chronic fatigue syndrome". PLOS ONE. 5 (1): e8519. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...5.8519E. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008519. PMC 2795199. PMID 20066031.
- Groom HC, Boucherit VC, Makinson K, Randal E, Baptista S, Hagan S, et al. (February 2010). "Absence of xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus in UK patients with chronic fatigue syndrome". Retrovirology. 7 (1): 10. doi:10.1186/1742-4690-7-10. PMC 2839973. PMID 20156349.
- van Kuppeveld FJ, de Jong AS, Lanke KH, Verhaegh GW, Melchers WJ, Swanink CM, et al. (February 2010). "Prevalence of xenotropic murine leukaemia virus-related virus in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in the Netherlands: retrospective analysis of samples from an established cohort". BMJ. 340: c1018. doi:10.1136/bmj.c1018. PMC 2829122. PMID 20185493.
- Alberts B (December 2011). "Retraction". Science. 334 (6063): 1636. Bibcode:2011Sci...334.1636A. doi:10.1126/science.334.6063.1636-a. PMID 22194552.
- Lo SC, Pripuzova N, Li B, Komaroff AL, Hung GC, Wang R, et al. (January 2012). "Retraction for Lo et al., Detection of MLV-related virus gene sequences in blood of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and healthy blood donors". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109 (1): 346. Bibcode:2012PNAS..109..346.. doi:10.1073/pnas.1119641109. PMC 3252929. PMID 22203980.
- Johnson AD, Cohn CS (October 2016). "Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Virus (XMRV) and the Safety of the Blood Supply". Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 29 (4): 749–57. doi:10.1128/CMR.00086-15. PMC 5010753. PMID 27358491.
- White PD, Goldsmith KA, Johnson AL, Potts L, Walwyn R, DeCesare JC, et al. (March 2011). "Comparison of adaptive pacing therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, graded exercise therapy, and specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome (PACE): a randomised trial". Lancet. 377 (9768): 823–36. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60096-2. PMC 3065633. PMID 21334061.
- "IACFS/ME Statement on the PACE Trial: The Issue of Illness 'Reversal'". The International Association for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ME (IACFS/ME). 24 February 2011. Archived from the original on 18 July 2011. Retrieved 3 August 2011.
- "PACE: 'surprising and disappointing'". Action for ME. 18 February 2011. Archived from the original on 25 February 2011. Retrieved 3 August 2011.
- Britton T (18 February 2011). "ME Association press statement about the results of the PACE study". ME Association. Archived from the original on 27 July 2011. Retrieved 3 August 2011.
- McCleary K. "Falling off the PACE" (PDF). The CAA (CFIDS) Association of America. Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 June 2011. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
- (Editorial) (May 2011). "Patients' power and PACE". Lancet. 377 (9780): 1808. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60696-X. PMID 21592553. S2CID 32809857.
- ^ Hawkes N (June 2011). "Dangers of research into chronic fatigue syndrome". BMJ. 342: d3780. doi:10.1136/bmj.d3780. PMID 21697226. S2CID 27301336.
- "Comparison of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome - the PACE trial". ABC Radio National. 15 April 2011. Archived from the original on 12 December 2019. Retrieved 24 May 2020.
- Rehmeyer J (13 November 2015). "The Debate Over Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is Suddenly Shifting". Slate Magazine. Archived from the original on 15 August 2019. Retrieved 24 May 2020.
- "An open letter to Dr. Richard Horton and The Lancet". www.virology.ws. 13 November 2015. Archived from the original on 20 April 2016. Retrieved 2 May 2016.
- Goldin R (21 March 2016). "PACE: The research that sparked a patient rebellion and challenged medicine". Sense About Statistics. Archived from the original on 21 December 2016.
- Edwards J (August 2017). "PACE team response shows a disregard for the principles of science". Journal of Health Psychology. 22 (9): 1155–1158. doi:10.1177/1359105317700886. PMID 28805520.
- ^ Blease C, Geraghty KJ (September 2018). "Are ME/CFS Patient Organizations "Militant"? : Patient Protest in a Medical Controversy". Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. 15 (3): 393–401. doi:10.1007/s11673-018-9866-5. PMID 29971693. S2CID 49677273.
- Vink M (August 2017). "PACE trial authors continue to ignore their own null effect". Journal of Health Psychology. 22 (9): 1134–1140. doi:10.1177/1359105317703785. PMID 28805519. S2CID 206713549.
- ^ Vink M, Vink-Niese A (8 October 2018). "Graded exercise therapy for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome is not effective and unsafe. Re-analysis of a Cochrane review". Health Psychology Open. 5 (2): 2055102918805187. doi:10.1177/2055102918805187. PMC 6176540. PMID 30305916.
- Twisk FN, Maes M (2009). "A review on cognitive behavorial therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) in myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) / chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): CBT/GET is not only ineffective and not evidence-based, but also potentially harmful for many patients with ME/CFS". Neuro Endocrinology Letters. 30 (3): 284–99. PMID 19855350.
- ^ Wilshire CE, Kindlon T, Courtney R, Matthees A, Tuller D, Geraghty K, et al. (March 2018). "Rethinking the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome-a reanalysis and evaluation of findings from a recent major trial of graded exercise and CBT". BMC Psychology. 6 (1): 6. doi:10.1186/s40359-018-0218-3. PMC 5863477. PMID 29562932.
- Vink M, Vink-Niese F (September 2019). "Work Rehabilitation and Medical Retirement for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients. A Review and Appraisal of Diagnostic Strategies". Diagnostics. 9 (4): 124. doi:10.3390/diagnostics9040124. PMC 6963831. PMID 31547009.
- Vink M, Vink-Niese A (May 2022). "The Updated NICE Guidance Exposed the Serious Flaws in CBT and Graded Exercise Therapy Trials for ME/CFS". Healthcare. 10 (5): 898. doi:10.3390/healthcare10050898. PMC 9141828. PMID 35628033.
- ^ Dove A (August 2000). "GAO reports on CFS funding controversy". Nature Medicine. 6 (8): 846. doi:10.1038/78579. PMID 10932206. S2CID 1431198.
- Mays P (6 July 1999). "CDC Diverts Chronic Fatigue Funds". AP NEWS. Archived from the original on 25 June 2020. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
- Fielden T (29 July 2011). "'Torrent of abuse' hindering ME research". BBC News.
- Kindlon T, Goudsmit EM (February 2010). "Graded exercise for chronic fatigue syndrome: too soon to dismiss reports of adverse reactions". Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 42 (2): 184, author reply 184–6. doi:10.2340/16501977-0493. PMID 20140417. Retrieved 17 July 2020.
- Geraghty KJ, Blease C (January 2018). "Cognitive behavioural therapy in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome: A narrative review on efficacy and informed consent". Journal of Health Psychology. 23 (1): 127–138. doi:10.1177/1359105316667798. PMID 27634687. S2CID 31832147. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 25 August 2021.
- ^ Coyne JC (27 September 2017). "Parents should have been warned about unprofessional providers in Esther Crawley's SMILE trial". Coyne of the Realm. Archived from the original on 18 July 2020. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
- Tuller D (13 December 2019). "BMJ should retract flawed paper on chronic fatigue syndrome". STAT. Archived from the original on 28 October 2020. Retrieved 18 July 2020.
Unfortunately for BMJ, in addition to the mess over the Lightning Process study, Crawley was also directed earlier this year to correct the ethics statements in eleven other published papers – five of them in BMJ journals.
- König RS, Paris DH, Sollberger M, Tschopp R (March 2024). "Identifying the mental health burden in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) patients in Switzerland: A pilot study". Heliyon. 10 (5): e27031. Bibcode:2024Heliy..1027031K. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27031. PMC 10907781. PMID 38434357.
- Chu L, Elliott M, Stein E, Jason LA (May 2021). "Identifying and Managing Suicidality in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome". Healthcare. 9 (6): 629. doi:10.3390/healthcare9060629. PMC 8227525. PMID 34070367.
- ^ Sandeman G (22 September 2022). "Chronic fatigue syndrome patient told: 'You're making it up'". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Archived from the original on 9 December 2023. Retrieved 14 April 2024.
- "Emily didn't 'only' have ME". The Telegraph. 23 June 2013. Archived from the original on 8 December 2023. Retrieved 14 April 2024.
- ^ "Real life: The long goodbye". Irish Independent. 8 March 2010. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
- "Daughter's death 'could have been avoided'". BBC News. 19 December 2023. Archived from the original on 21 March 2024. Retrieved 14 April 2024.
- Tuller D (27 January 2023). "When the doctor doesn't listen". Coda Story. Archived from the original on 28 December 2023. Retrieved 14 April 2024.
- Humphries W (14 April 2024). "Hospitals have no services for most severe ME cases, coroner told". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Archived from the original on 30 January 2024. Retrieved 14 April 2024.
- Bateman L, Bested AC, Bonilla HF, Chheda BV, Chu L, Curtin JM, et al. (November 2021). "Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Essentials of Diagnosis and Management". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 96 (11): 2861–2878. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.07.004. PMID 34454716.
- Araja D, Berkis U, Lunga A, Murovska M (July 2021). "Shadow Burden of Undiagnosed Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) on Society: Retrospective and Prospective-In Light of COVID-19". Journal of Clinical Medicine. 10 (14): 3017. doi:10.3390/jcm10143017. PMC 8303374. PMID 34300183.
- ^ Committee on the Diagnostic Criteria for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Board on the Health of Select Populations, Institute of Medicine. (February 2015). Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness (Report). Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). PMID 25695122.
- Arild Angelsen and Trude Schei. 2024. EMEA survey of ME/CFS patients in Europe: Same disease, different approaches and experiences.
- "Karina Hansen is Finally Home (sort of...)". Daily Kos. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
- "Family push for daughter's removal from hospital". BBC News. 12 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
- "I never imagined my sister would die". The Irish Times. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
- Hooper R. "First official UK death from chronic fatigue syndrome". New Scientist. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
- Tuller D (17 July 2007). "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome No Longer Seen as 'Yuppie Flu'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 March 2015. Retrieved 15 June 2009.
- Jason LA, Taylor RR, Plioplys S, Stepanek Z, Shlaes J (2002). "Evaluating attributions for an illness based upon the name: chronic fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalopathy and Florence Nightingale disease". Am J Community Psychol. 30 (1): 133–48. doi:10.1023/A:1014328319297. PMID 11928774. S2CID 27350772.
- ^ Tuller D (10 February 2015). "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Gets a New Name". Well. Retrieved 25 April 2024.
- Podell R, Dimmock ME, Comerford BB (20 July 2020). Mooney A (ed.). "Documenting disability in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)". Work. 66 (2): 339–352. doi:10.3233/WOR-203178. PMID 32568153.
- "Inquiry into the status of CFS/ME and research into causes and treatment". United Kingdom Parliamentary Group on Scientific Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. 1 November 2006. Archived from the original on 24 June 2010. Retrieved 25 June 2010.
- "Landmark Study Confirms Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Is 'Unambiguously Biological'". Science Alert. 24 March 2024. Archived from the original on 4 April 2024. Retrieved 13 April 2024.
Further reading
- Johnson H (1996). Osler's Web: Inside the Labyrinth of the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Epidemic. Crown Publishers, New York. ISBN 978-0-517-70353-3.
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome | |
---|---|
Medical issues | |
Research | |
Society and history | |
Organizations |