| Revision as of 14:29, 28 November 2008 editSgeureka (talk | contribs)Administrators34,676 edits →Übersetzungsfrage: reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,069 edits →Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (490 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Message | |||
| {{Notice|Deja Messages Ici Bitte. I will generally respond to any comments, queries, calumnies or complaints here. Whatever you do, ]}} | |||
| | bgcolor = #gray | |||
| | border-color = #black | |||
| | color = #black | |||
| | linkcolor = #orange | |||
| }} | |||
| {{TOCleft}} | |||
| -------------- | -------------- | ||
| Line 8: | Line 14: | ||
| #] | #] | ||
| #] | #] | ||
| #] |
#] | ||
| #] | |||
| #]}} | |||
| == |
== January 2023 == | ||
| Hi. I don't know whether you remember the ''']'''? I've now put the template up for deletion ''']'''? Thanks. --'']]'' 23:57, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] Thank you for ] to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from ] into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, ] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an ] at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and ] to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>]</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> ] ] 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Bach== | |||
| == ] moved to draftspace == | |||
| Hi Eusebeus -- Florestan here -- thank you for your backup on that article. I had just now, in the last ten minutes before you posted, pulled a weighty pile of books from my shelf to provide quotations from minor figures like Donald Francis Tovey, Nicolas Slonimsky, and Richard Wagner ("Bach is the most stupendous miracle in music") to back up the five theses nailed to our talk page door. I wonder if I'm wasting my time. The sky still appears to be blue, but the scholars aren't putting it in exactly those words. Maybe we need to rewrite the lead as follows: "Johann Sebastian Bach (1685 (cite) - 1750 (cite) ) was a German (cite) composer (cite) of the late Baroque era (cite). Scholars such as xxx (cite) and xxx (cite) thought his music wasn't bad (cite). He played the organ too (cite). -- OK, I'm glad I wrote that: I'm no longer irritated: I'm laughing. Cheers, ] ] 15:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your contributions to ]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''. | |||
| Thank you Florestan! Oh that was funny! Do you remember the argument that erupted when JSB went through the good article process? It was mighty similar to what you are saying above. Anyway, I have been running my fingers through ''Kinderszenen'' this morning, channeling the inner Eusebeus more than usual and so was happy to intervene again. I have posted to the Composers project page asking for wider input. ] (]) 15:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. | |||
| Please see more information at ]. | |||
| :You've got mail. -- Yes, I like the way they handle it on fr: and de: too, and yes I remember that shocking scene at GA (wasn't there someone who had never heard the term "musicology" and regarded that as a special badge of pride? And yet thought himself qualified to assess the article on matters of content? -- oy.) Been playing (badly) the slow movement of Beethoven's opus 106, which, when properly considered, makes conflicts here look miniscule and amoebic. Cheers, ] ] 22:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ] (]) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ::''(Butting in)'' I think things will ease up at some stage when we get some form of ''show/hide'' switch for inline refs. Funny, but I can completely tune them out. I had a similar argument with ] about bluelinks; he considers them in numbers problematic for reading prose, however, I have really tuned them out too. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 01:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>'''Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| :(to Antandrus) Oh now that's just fucking impressive. Inspired, I tried the same but admit I gave up at about mm 88 as simply too much. But I think you are more the musician than I am. You know that is a VERY interesting movement. If you consider the phrasing, it is SO full of nuance. For example, right at the beginning, the decrescendo at m5 effectively acts as a fermata (even though none is indicated) - but just try playing it in tempo; much the same obtains throughout the movement. Anyway, I am blessed to be in contact with two editors (yes, that means you too Casliber, dammit, don't let it go to your head!, and btw I have some good stuff about the garbage patch to add in) who are so bloody talented. This is why I remain here. Honestly: thanks. ] (]) 03:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| I confess, I have had ] ] ] on the ], although I don't think I have burnt or ruined any just yet...I do recall some talk of moving the name of GPGP to EGP via an email or somesuch. Would this still be prudent? Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 04:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *Yea, I have a lot of shit for you on this point, but I am still accumulating. Don't fear - you are still on the hook ;). ] (]) 04:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| <s>I decided to do an article with more ''gravitas'' than the usual FA fare, and gravitas it has in buckets...all 130kb, luckily it has under 50kb of prose. It has recently had a ] by delldot and looks the better for it. I have gone goggle-eyed at it and am aware of the likelihood of oodles of glitches in the mammoth prose. I as wondering with your aptitude for succinct prose whether there were any ungainly bits that needed a good massage. PS: This is a good example of an article which needs citing to the hilt, all it needs is some antipsychiatry (or pro-psychiatry or god-knows-what-well-anyone-with-a-difference-of-opinion-to-me) person to come along and raise hell. have a look at the talk page and history of ] for a good chuckle...Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 14:04, 15 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| :My impression is it is not ''too'' far off (though I am square/goggle-eyed from looking at it). I wasn't high on my list of to-do items, but several editors began improving it in earnest, so I decided to take advantage of the synergy/conflux/''concursus''/whatever and tried to work it into an impromptu collaboration. Won't know whether it will have worked until after a successful FAC but I am cautiously optimistic, though dread taking such a behemoth through FAC without every attempt to clean up as much as possible. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 03:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)</s> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| ::Nevermind, so ] whose contributions and opinion I value, has pointed out some content issues we have to address before copyediting really...Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 11:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == carrots rather than sticks == | |||
| </div> | |||
| I suspect you see a fair few pages in your wiki-travels and I ''know'' you have a bit to say on the depth of coverage of cruft vs. encyclopedic material. In efforts to counteract systemic bias with sticks rather than carrots (and seeing what non-obscure stubs remain out there), i have listed a minicompetition of sorts ], so I'd be intrigued what comes up. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 02:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
| == Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <section begin="announcement-content" /> | |||
| Here's something that your touch and skill with copyediting succinctly may be able to dislodge some issues at a ]. I was asked to have a look and was impressed at the subject matter I had hitherto been completely unaware of. I can copyedit but tend to dicker around a bit, whereas you have a talent for really being able to appraise 3-4 sentences and summarising very succinctly very well. If you are too snowed never mind, but I did think that a bit of finesse copyediting could see this through. Anyway, see what you think and how you're travelling timewise. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 11:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :''] '' | |||
| Dear Wikimedian, | |||
| :Ok, I did a quick drive by on the first four paragraphs. It needs a rewrite top to bottom - luckily the raw material is quite good so the copy-editing is not too burdensome. But as with many FACs the article is a bit long, so it will be a time consuming process. I know absolutely nothing about the subject, so I regret I can only contribute whatever prose skills I may possess. ] (]) 20:37, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process. | |||
| ::Weird, eh? The things one reads about on WP...Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 20:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Indeed. I now know what Manga means for instance. Ok, you should probably comb through my copyedit and reove any infelicities I have left behind. ] (]) 21:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::If I can, weekend chores are mounting and I have just merged the obviously synonymous ] and ], and there is ''alot'' of spring cleaning to do there!! Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 21:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility. | |||
| ::::PS: I was not aware that early 20th century Indian scholars were into manga...Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 21:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ]. | |||
| == Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch == | |||
| Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well. | |||
| * Thank you for your recent participation in the ] which closed with a ] result of '''Keep'''. Unfortunately, the nominator is not content with this consensus and is now proposing that the article be merged. Please see ]. ] (]) 20:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" /> | |||
| == Funny thing is.... == | |||
| ] 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| I too can ] (I mean, you think merging two synonyms would be simple(?)), but I will try to be more collaborative in the discussion, and see, all looks promising - there is a difference between asking and demanding. | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list&oldid=26721206 --> | |||
| PS: Jack Merridew/Davenbelle was another I meant to add to editors who actually have a surprisingly lot to offer, but for ] Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 02:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| You seem to go way back. Why did you delete all my discussion stuff on the Wall Street Crash of 1929? I just learned how to make footnotes 2 days ago. I need all the help I can get. ] (]) 17:41, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry I wasn't trying to be rude (and feel free to restore them if you wish) - just that your discussion comments seemed rather stream-of-consciousness. You don't need to provide rationale for the kind of solid edits you have been making. To wit, your edits to the article were much appreciated and if you are interested I have a few thoughts about shoring up the work you put in. ] (]) 19:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, any help would be greatly appreciated. I am having the most trouble with anything associated with Smoot-Hawley. I am getting the feeling that as much as possible about Smoot-Hawley should be removed from the article but I am too ignorant to know what to do. Thanks again. ] (]) 00:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *I will reply on the article talk page jde. I will also clean up your comments if you don't mind as adding a new section for every one you have to make is unnecessary and distracting. ] (]) 15:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==] soundfile== | |||
| Hi. This sound file was approved as a 'featured sound' despite your opposition and that of ]. If you are still interested see ]. Thanks. (BTW The file is no longer on the article.) Best. --'']]'' 08:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Scrubs is back == | |||
| http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Tej68 —](]) 02:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Whoa, calm down. == | |||
| I noticed, based upon the ALL CAPS that you seem to be more than a bit grumpy about the edit tags getting removed. I honestly don't believe it is getting worked up about. Really. Have a nice day =) ] (]) 02:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==] reminder notice== | |||
| {| class="wikitable"; border="1" width = "80%" border="1" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="0" style="margin: 0.5em 1em 0.5em 0; background:#bee4ef; border: 1px #006f8f solid; border-collapse: collapse;" | |||
| !colspan="2" style="background:#aaccff;"|<center>A friendly reminder from the Adopt-a-User project =) | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |Hey there Eusebeus! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at ] whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers! | |||
| |- | |||
| |} | |||
| :*<small>Notice delivery by <font face="Verdana">]</font> 14:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == ]'' == | |||
| One of the advantages of not having many supporters at your RFA is that there are fewer people to thank at the end. Thanks for your support and your willingness to look at my complete record. I'm going to try to interpret this resounding defeat as a statement that I should choose my words more carefully in the future, and remember that every statement I make gets recorded forever, just waiting to get carefully transcribed onto my next RFA. I would go insane if I believed that it was repudiation of what I truly meant: that no editor should consciously and willfully ignore guidelines and policies, and editors that repeatedly do so should not be rewarded for or supported in doing so. | |||
| I'm sure I'll get back to full speed editing soon, because, after all, , ].—](]) 05:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *Kevin, you will make a fine admin and I am confident that at some point you will succeed. You have an integrity that we need and I will support you unconditionally should you brave the RfA waters again. ] (]) 04:29, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Protection== | |||
| Since the attacks on this page restarted after the previous protection expired, i've readded it for another week, hopefully long enough for them to get bored.--] (]) 00:37, 19 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *Tx. Hadn't realised. Wonder what that is all about? Muh. ] (]) 13:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==RfA thanks== | |||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 5px solid #CCCCCC; background-color: #E6E6FA;" | |||
| |align="left"|] | |||
| |align="center"|Hi Eusebeus, and thanks for supporting my ]. It was nice to see all the kind comments I got from my supporters and I hope that I will be more useful to the community now that I have the tools again.--] (]) 15:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Belated reply (sigh) == | |||
| Here I was going to argue about how importatn it was to do high traffic articles such as .....but then I noted has been viewed almost as much, and even the subpages , ah well, such is life. I do this to relax, and merge debates were/are not what I needed, though my decision to pursue ] has been less than therapeutic and an exercise in humility really. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 02:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Salut Eusebeus, Si le thème t'intéresse toujours, voici quelques informations supplémentaires http://www.larousse.fr/ref/musdico/Jean-Baptiste-Morin_169223.htm. Un bonjour musical de -- ] (]) 18:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| OK, I might have pushed it with this remark as far as WP policies go. Still, I'm merely continuing an old posting that started over a month ago (my first sentence links to the archive). The issue with Alastairward is that he adheres to WP policies on the expense of the entire South Park fan community that reads WP. I'm talking about common sense here - any thoughts? ] (]) 21:23, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *I would solicit feedback from both the Television and Southpark projects. I personally am in agreement with Alastair, and would urge you to accept that our policies exist for a reason. But above all, remain civil, don't take things personally and ask for wider input. ] (]) 23:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Question from a new user == | |||
| Hello, you seem to be truly helpful, I'm new and had an assist on my client: Manuelita Brown, sculptor. I find it not true to my contrib. and somewhat askew on facts/biased with no basis, also they left out all the good refs, please help to correct it to my true written piece. thx] (]) 01:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *Could you be more specific in your question? I am not sure I understand what you are asking. ] (]) 05:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] FAC restarted == | |||
| Note to all !voters on the original ] FAC: The FAC for that article has been '''restarted''' at ]. ] (]) 02:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Übersetzungsfrage == | |||
| sg, here is the passage. | |||
| <blockquote>Indem diese Vollkommenheit jedoch im Unterschied zur Einheit des Organismus stets erst verwirklicht werden muss, vermittelt eine derartige Sicht nicht mehr wie im 12. Jahrhundert den Eindruck einer statischen Ordnung; vielmehr liegt ihr die Vorstellung eines dynamischen Prozesses zugrunde, welcher aus der Spannung zwischen der jeweils konkreten Existenz des Staates und einem also vollkommen betrachteten Idealzustand hervorgeht. Folglich erstreckt sich auch die Tätigkeit des Herrschers nicht mehr allein darauf, die verschiedenartigen Funktionen der im Staat vereinigten Berufsgruppen und Stände miteinander zu koordinieren.</blockquote> | |||
| I am a bit bewildered by the opening sentence, but I translate it as follows: | |||
| ''Insofar as this perfection, in contrast with unity of the organism, must first be achieved, such a vision no longer mediates, as in the 12th century, the impression of a static order.'' | |||
| Anyway, if you can help me out (and even if not - no worries), vielen Dank! ] (]) 00:09, 28 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :That's horrible German! Without reading your translation first, I'd translate it as ''Because this perfection always has to be realized first, contrary to the unity of the organism, such a perception/view does not convey/impart the impression of static order as was once usual in the 12th century.'' Now, comparing my translation to yours, I still don't know what it means. Mix your translation with mine, and you may be getting to the truth. – ] <sup>]•]</sup> 00:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks sg! Yours is an improvement over mine. Can you give a stab at the rest of the passage? (This is needless to say academic German.) I won't influence you by posting my own translation. ] (]) 13:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::''it(**) is rather based on the conception/belief of a dynamic process that emerges from the tension between the respective concrete existance of the state and a therefore completely examined(***) perfection. Thus, the duty of a ruler/sovereign is also broadened beyond coordinating the diverse functions of occupational groups and classes that the state unifies.'' | |||
| :::* (**) ''it'' == the perfection, but could also be the view, depending on the preceding sentences | |||
| :::* (***) Please check if your source says "und einem als'''o''' vollkommen betrachteten Idealzustand" or "und einem als vollkommen betrachteten Idealzustand". The second version is redundantly redundant but changes the meaning to ''and an as perfect regarded aspired state/condition''. – ] <sup>]•]</sup> 14:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:18, 2 May 2024
| Please leave a new message. |
 Archives |
January 2023
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jean Jullien into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Misplaced Pages's content, here or elsewhere, Misplaced Pages's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Misplaced Pages, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from ]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Misplaced Pages:Copying within Misplaced Pages. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher)
The article Christian Friedrich Michaelis (philosopher) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced with unclear claim to notability.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,