Misplaced Pages

Help talk:Editing: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:35, 16 January 2002 view sourceAxelBoldt (talk | contribs)Administrators44,501 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:13, 21 July 2024 view source Andrybak (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Template editors81,054 edits Trying to add 2 "reclassified" numbers on a page?: <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext"></syntaxhighlight>; mark unsigned Special:Diff/604202309 (using Unsigned helper
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
Talk about how to edit a page here!
{{Not a sandbox}}
{{pp-semi}}
{{notice|'''This is the Talk page for the ] help page.''' Talk pages allow you to discuss how to improve a page: see ]. For general help, take a look at the ] or ask a question at the ].}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{Misplaced Pages Help Project|class=NA|importance=High}}
}}
{{Copied | from=Help:Editing|to=Help:Wikitext|to_diff=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Help:Wiki_markup&oldid=329580052 |from_oldid=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Help:Editing&oldid=328539398}}
{{merged from|Misplaced Pages:How does one edit a page}}
{{Has feedback page}}
{{Screencast requested}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(90d)
| archive=Help talk:Editing/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=5
| maxarchivesize=75K
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadsleft=5
| minthreadstoarchive=2
}}


== Trying to add 2 "reclassified" numbers on a page? ==


I've been adding to USN ship pages the past few days and in the info boxes I need to add of the same descriptions. It looks like this "|Ship reclassified=". Well the shp in question had been reclassified twice in her life and i've tried adding the last one inbetween the recom and decom dates but it won't show up??? Any clues? This is the coding I have right now:


<syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext">
This is the /Talk page for the ] page. Don't know what a "talk page" is? See ].
|Ship commissioned=30 June 1943
|Ship recommissioned=
|Ship decommissioned=29 October 1946
|Ship reclassified=CAG-14 January 1952
}}
{{Infobox ship career
|Hide header=yes
|Ship recommissioned=1 November 1955
:Ship reclassified=CA-69 May 1968
|Ship decommissioned=5 May 1970
</syntaxhighlight> <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)</small>


== Editing Wars ==


Why do editors like to war over certain sections of articles and wording? ] (]) 10:21, 2 December 2021 (UTC)


:@] When two people disagree on the best way to present information they may continually change a page back to show their preferred versions. This constant changing would be very disruptive, and is termed ]. They could both be blocked for behaving like this. ] (]) 09:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
The ] page is concise and helpful, especially with the code producing the results to the left showing already. I like it. --KQ


== Editing tool use ==
I pulled some stats about which tools people use for editing. Here are the numbers from last month (December 2021). These are only edits from the English Misplaced Pages, made by non-bot accounts, in all namespaces.


This is based on ], so tools/edits that don't add a tag aren't counted. I know that this includes some people's personal AWB copies and wikEd, but I'm not sure what else might be missing. If your favorite tool isn't in this list, it's probably because it's not tagging the edits correctly. Look at ] and related tasks to see what needs to be done.
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Number of edits by editing tool, December 2021
!Tool used
!Number of edits
!Relative
|-
|] (2010 wikitext editor)
|237,695
|1,000
|-
|]
|123,990
|522
|-
|]
|117,440
|494
|-
|]
|62,674
|264
|-
|] (2017 wikitext editor)
|31,178
|131
|-
|]
|21,572
|91
|-
|] (e.g., Reply tool)
|11,244
|47
|-
|] (may be an undercount)
|7,210
|30
|-
|]
|6,747
|28
|-
|]
|2,139
|9
|-
|]
|1,410
|6
|-
|] (Page curation)
|1,213
|5
|-
|]
|721
|3
|-
|]
|423
|2
|-
|]
|402
|2
|-
|]
|358
|2
|-
|]
|194
|1
|-
|2003 wikitext editor (no revision tags)
|?
|?
|-
|] (no revision tags)
|?
|?
|}
I pulled the numbers from this table in Superset (a modification of ), and realistically, I don't expect to be able to re-generate it. I expect DiscussionTools to be used considerably more in the coming months, as it is ready to deploy default-on here. If you want to have these numbers for another wiki, annual updates for this wiki, etc., then you probably need to make a request from the Data Engineering team via their public mailing list, (]).


@], can you think of any sensible place to post this (or parts of it), if you think that would be useful? It's not exactly ] material, and I don't think it really needs to be on any help page. ] (]) 20:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Best solution yet! --StefanRybo


:@], we talked about this at ]. ] (]) 19:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
::Wonder if this could become a monthly ]? — ] <sup>]</sup> 19:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
:::@], it probably could be (it's all public information), but then someone would have to set up and maintain the report, which I understand has been a challenge in the past.
:::One difficulty: It's very tempting to add up all the numbers, and declare that ''n''% of non-bot edits are made with this or that. This approach should be pretty sound for determining that there are approximately two edits in the 2010WTE for every one edit made in the visual editor, but it is ''not'' useful for determining that 35% of all non-bot edits are made in the 2010WTE. Not all tools tag their edits, and Undo doesn't give you a choice of editing environments, so we don't know what the denominator should be. ] (]) 22:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
:Not really. --] &#x1f339; (]) 14:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


== Shift key behaving oddly (moving cursor to the left) ==


Whenever I'm editing a page, for reasons that I have been unable to discern or discover via web searches for others who have my problem, if I press either 'shift' key, the (typing) cursor will suddenly start rocketing to the right, seemingly one word at a time (for Vim or vi users, imagine rapidly pressing 'b' over and over again) when I'm in the visual editor, and will just appear at the start of the line ('0', for vi users) when in the source editor. This issue also appears to be operating system agnostic. This behavior is VERY infuriating, and I've only figured out one way to get around it, but it's finecky at best. In the source editor, if I move the mouse cursor onto a word on the line that I'm currently editing (note that this entire 'message' thing is one line), then for some reason, whatever string of characters that my mouse cursor is currently hovering over top of will appear in a box bellow and to the left of the mouse cursor. As long as that box is showing, the 'shift' key will function normally. The problem, of course, is that now, 2.5 lines of text are being covered by a useless box, and this thing 'resets' every time I move the cursor (which causes the box to disappear). How do I fix this??? ] (]) 12:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Yes, I like it a lot. If somebody would just complete the feature list (headers, for example, are missing), I think we should replace the relevant part of ] with this. --]
:{{replyto|LiftedStarfish}} this is not a help desk, it is the ] for discussing improvements to the page ]. You might be better off asking at ]. --] &#x1f339; (]) 22:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)


== Why did the source editor become so horrible? ==


It's still a measly text field, with no syntax highlights or any extra features.
Yet when I paste long wikimedia source text it takes an obscene amount of time to do so. As well as Firefox interrupting the process with a "script is slowing down the browser" message (paraphasing).
It ridiculous. It's plaintext, that's not processed in any shape or form, yet I need minutes to paste a large table for example. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:{{replyto|Dqeswn}} this is the ] for discussing improvements to the page ]. You would be better off asking at ]; but I suspect that it is something to do with ]. --] &#x1f339; (]) 19:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
::Potentially. But I didn't see any, only a lot of links to internal pages and a lot of references.
::And wouldn't it be simpler to show such warnings, when you try to save and it offers you to preview and add a comment (etc)?
::(It was this text actually: https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Dqeswn/sandbox?veaction=editsource&section=1#Deaths ) ] (]) 18:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


== This article no longer valid, editing cheatsheet is no longer ==
Please everyone add missing features here:

* headers

* ascii art integrals

* ...



----



Where is the discussion of how to create sub-pages, and how to refer to sub pages in links?

Also, what are appropriate Sub-pages?



----



How do I redirect a link to another page - for instance, how to I get all links to ] to point to ]? -- ]



To redirect an article, make the entry <nowiki>#REDIRECT ]</nowiki> --KQ

----

Why doesn't someone revamp the ] page with the "quick reference"? The latter is clearly better than the old page. Don't be shy, just do it. --]



----

I just removed the following example from the definition list section:

; Fruit : pear

: apple

The reason is that neither pear nor apple can serve as the definition of "fruit". The article already contains an example which makes the usage of definition lists clear. The additional indented "apple" has nothing to do with definition lists. --AxelBoldt

----



What is the escape code for a forward slash? (i.e. '/ ')--branko



Forward slashes aren't special, you can just type them in without escaping. Backslashes aren't special either, except at the end of a line, where the easiest way to escape them is by following them with a <nowiki>&amp;nbsp;</nowiki>.



:Forward slashes are not special And/Or dangerous -- hey, I just created a sub page. The use of the slash like that in Dutch (and hence in the Dutch Misplaced Pages) is quite common.



:Sorry, I should have mentioned that.--branko



::Oh, I see. You have to surround the whole construct with <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki> and <nowiki>&lt;/nowiki></nowiki>, as in <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki><nowiki>And/Or</nowiki><nowiki>&lt;/nowiki></nowiki> --AxelBoldt


I now only come to Misplaced Pages occasionally to make a comment on talk pages, as I've become thoroughly discontent with what wikipedia has become. But even this has been made difficult. The only editing cues I now have access to on Firefox are B,I,A,link,@. There's not even a signature shortcut anymore. When I visit the French wikipedia, there's a super long useful cheatsheet. What is happening? I had to google search how to add a signature to this comment. :( '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>''' ] (]) 01:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:13, 21 July 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Editing page.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This page is not a sandbox.
It should not be used for test editing. To experiment, please use the Misplaced Pages sandbox, your user sandbox, or the other sandboxes.
Page semi-protectedEditing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account.
This is the Talk page for the Help:Editing help page. Talk pages allow you to discuss how to improve a page: see Talk Page. For general help, take a look at the help pages or ask a question at the help desk.
This help page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMisplaced Pages Help High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of the Misplaced Pages Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Misplaced Pages HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Misplaced Pages Help ProjectHelp
HighThis page has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Help:Editing was copied or moved into Help:Wikitext with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
The contents of the Misplaced Pages:How does one edit a page page were merged into Help:Editing. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Help:Editing has an associated feedback page, Help:Editing/feedback. It should be checked regularly, and posts responded to or deleted as appropriate.
A computer and screenThis documentation could benefit from a screencast to explain the topic in an easily accessible way. See WikiProject Screencast for additional information.

Trying to add 2 "reclassified" numbers on a page?

I've been adding to USN ship pages the past few days and in the info boxes I need to add of the same descriptions. It looks like this "|Ship reclassified=". Well the shp in question had been reclassified twice in her life and i've tried adding the last one inbetween the recom and decom dates but it won't show up??? Any clues? This is the coding I have right now:

|Ship commissioned=30 June 1943
|Ship recommissioned=
|Ship decommissioned=29 October 1946
|Ship reclassified=CAG-14 January 1952
}}
{{Infobox ship career
|Hide header=yes
|Ship recommissioned=1 November 1955
:Ship reclassified=CA-69 May 1968
|Ship decommissioned=5 May 1970

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 85 GT Kid (talkcontribs) 19:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Editing Wars

Why do editors like to war over certain sections of articles and wording? Michuk (talk) 10:21, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

@Michuk When two people disagree on the best way to present information they may continually change a page back to show their preferred versions. This constant changing would be very disruptive, and is termed WP:EDITWARRING. They could both be blocked for behaving like this. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Editing tool use

I pulled some stats about which tools people use for editing. Here are the numbers from last month (December 2021). These are only edits from the English Misplaced Pages, made by non-bot accounts, in all namespaces.

This is based on Special:Tags, so tools/edits that don't add a tag aren't counted. I know that this includes some people's personal AWB copies and wikEd, but I'm not sure what else might be missing. If your favorite tool isn't in this list, it's probably because it's not tagging the edits correctly. Look at phab:T188433 and related tasks to see what needs to be done.

Number of edits by editing tool, December 2021
Tool used Number of edits Relative
WikiEditor (2010 wikitext editor) 237,695 1,000
Mobile web 123,990 522
VisualEditor 117,440 494
Twinkle 62,674 264
VisualEditor's wikitext mode (2017 wikitext editor) 31,178 131
Mobile app 21,572 91
DiscussionTools (e.g., Reply tool) 11,244 47
AWB (may be an undercount) 7,210 30
RedWarn 6,747 28
Huggle 2,139 9
ProveIt 1,410 6
PageTriage (Page curation) 1,213 5
editProtectedHelper 721 3
WikiLove 423 2
ContentTranslation 402 2
WPCleaner 358 2
MassMessage 194 1
2003 wikitext editor (no revision tags) ? ?
WikEd (no revision tags) ? ?

I pulled the numbers from this table in Superset (a modification of this query), and realistically, I don't expect to be able to re-generate it. I expect DiscussionTools to be used considerably more in the coming months, as it is ready to deploy default-on here. If you want to have these numbers for another wiki, annual updates for this wiki, etc., then you probably need to make a request from the Data Engineering team via their public mailing list, analytics@lists.wikimedia.org (subscribe, archives).

@Redrose64, can you think of any sensible place to post this (or parts of it), if you think that would be useful? It's not exactly Misplaced Pages:Wikipedians material, and I don't think it really needs to be on any help page. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

@Xaosflux, we talked about this at Misplaced Pages:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 66#Popularity of editing methods. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Wonder if this could become a monthly Misplaced Pages:Database reports? — xaosflux 19:49, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
@Xaosflux, it probably could be (it's all public information), but then someone would have to set up and maintain the report, which I understand has been a challenge in the past.
One difficulty: It's very tempting to add up all the numbers, and declare that n% of non-bot edits are made with this or that. This approach should be pretty sound for determining that there are approximately two edits in the 2010WTE for every one edit made in the visual editor, but it is not useful for determining that 35% of all non-bot edits are made in the 2010WTE. Not all tools tag their edits, and Undo doesn't give you a choice of editing environments, so we don't know what the denominator should be. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 22:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Not really. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Shift key behaving oddly (moving cursor to the left)

Whenever I'm editing a page, for reasons that I have been unable to discern or discover via web searches for others who have my problem, if I press either 'shift' key, the (typing) cursor will suddenly start rocketing to the right, seemingly one word at a time (for Vim or vi users, imagine rapidly pressing 'b' over and over again) when I'm in the visual editor, and will just appear at the start of the line ('0', for vi users) when in the source editor. This issue also appears to be operating system agnostic. This behavior is VERY infuriating, and I've only figured out one way to get around it, but it's finecky at best. In the source editor, if I move the mouse cursor onto a word on the line that I'm currently editing (note that this entire 'message' thing is one line), then for some reason, whatever string of characters that my mouse cursor is currently hovering over top of will appear in a box bellow and to the left of the mouse cursor. As long as that box is showing, the 'shift' key will function normally. The problem, of course, is that now, 2.5 lines of text are being covered by a useless box, and this thing 'resets' every time I move the cursor (which causes the box to disappear). How do I fix this??? LiftedStarfish (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@LiftedStarfish: this is not a help desk, it is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Help:Editing. You might be better off asking at WP:RD/C. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Why did the source editor become so horrible?

It's still a measly text field, with no syntax highlights or any extra features. Yet when I paste long wikimedia source text it takes an obscene amount of time to do so. As well as Firefox interrupting the process with a "script is slowing down the browser" message (paraphasing). It ridiculous. It's plaintext, that's not processed in any shape or form, yet I need minutes to paste a large table for example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dqeswn (talkcontribs) 18:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

@Dqeswn: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Help:Editing. You would be better off asking at WP:VPT; but I suspect that it is something to do with m:Community Wishlist Survey 2021/Warn when linking to disambiguation pages. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Potentially. But I didn't see any, only a lot of links to internal pages and a lot of references.
And wouldn't it be simpler to show such warnings, when you try to save and it offers you to preview and add a comment (etc)?
(It was this text actually: https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Dqeswn/sandbox?veaction=editsource&section=1#Deaths ) Dqeswn (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

This article no longer valid, editing cheatsheet is no longer

I now only come to Misplaced Pages occasionally to make a comment on talk pages, as I've become thoroughly discontent with what wikipedia has become. But even this has been made difficult. The only editing cues I now have access to on Firefox are B,I,A,link,@. There's not even a signature shortcut anymore. When I visit the French wikipedia, there's a super long useful cheatsheet. What is happening? I had to google search how to add a signature to this comment. :( ~~~~ Tallard (talk) 01:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Categories: