| Revision as of 05:52, 7 December 2008 editDr.K. (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers110,824 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Muhammad and slavery. (TW) | Latest revision as of 14:03, 2 September 2010 edit undoSporkBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,245,011 editsm Remove deleted template per WP:TFD outcome | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == December 2008 == | == December 2008 == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Muhammad and slavery|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 05:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Muhammad and slavery|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 05:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :The merging of articles has the prerequisite of putting a merge proposal banner at the head of the article. Hence, enforcing that rule is an activity outside of 'edit warring'.] (]) 06:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::No it is not. If you read ] you will see that any 3 reversions outside of obvious vandalism qualify for 3RR. So if you reverted more than three times you would qualify because my actions were justified in the broader spirit of wp:3rr (long term edit warring, wp:spa, sockpuppetry etc, etc.). And you do seem to qualify at least for wp:spa status. This article has experienced more than its fair share of sockpuppetry, ] activity and block evasion tactics as well as long term edit warring and I don't think it needs more. However since you seem willing to discuss the matter I am willing to ] on your part and not pursue this any further. ] (]) 19:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{tmbox | |||
| | style = background: lightblue; | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | text = <big>'''Blocked as a sockpuppet'''</big><br clear="all" /> | |||
| '''''You have been ] indefinitely''''' as a ] of {{#if:DavidYork71|{{user19|DavidYork71}}|a banned or blocked user}}. Blocked or banned users are '''not allowed to edit''' Misplaced Pages; if you are '']'', all edits under this account may be reverted. | |||
| {{#if: | <p>'''Further comments:''' {{{2}}}</p>}} | |||
| Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: ].<!-- Template:Sockblock --> | |||
| }}{{#if:DavidYork71|] }} | |||
| ]__NOINDEX__ | |||
| - ] ] 02:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 2 September 2010
December 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Muhammad and slavery. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dr.K. (logos) 05:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- The merging of articles has the prerequisite of putting a merge proposal banner at the head of the article. Hence, enforcing that rule is an activity outside of 'edit warring'.CautiousWalk (talk) 06:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- No it is not. If you read WP:3RR you will see that any 3 reversions outside of obvious vandalism qualify for 3RR. So if you reverted more than three times you would qualify because my actions were justified in the broader spirit of wp:3rr (long term edit warring, wp:spa, sockpuppetry etc, etc.). And you do seem to qualify at least for wp:spa status. This article has experienced more than its fair share of sockpuppetry, WP:SPA activity and block evasion tactics as well as long term edit warring and I don't think it needs more. However since you seem willing to discuss the matter I am willing to assume good faith on your part and not pursue this any further. Dr.K. (logos) 19:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 | Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of DavidYork71 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Misplaced Pages; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Misplaced Pages:Appealing a block. |
- Peripitus (Talk) 02:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Categories: