Misplaced Pages

:Requests for permissions/Rollback: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:00, 15 December 2008 view sourceSoxBot X (talk | contribs)1,675 edits Removing SimonKSK, done.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:40, 29 December 2024 view source MusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,000 edits Bot clerking: archiving (1 approved) (1 open request remaining) 
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request rollback rights}}
===Rollback <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small>===
{{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog}}<!-- do not remove, managed by bot --></noinclude>


===<span id="rperm-rollback"></span>Rollback===
<!--
{{WP:PERM/Subpage|shortcut=R|subpage=Rollback|notice=<noinclude>
Requesters, COPY (do not cut) the following line, paste it at the top of the list and fill in the information:
Please review ''']''' before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have:
# At least {{Misplaced Pages:Rollback/Mainspace count}} ] edits.
# At least a month of experience patrolling ].
# No recent history of ].
# A track record of consistently ] editors when reverting their edits.
The ] is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.
</noinclude>}}
<!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.-->


⚫ ====]====
{{subst:rfp|Username|Reason for requesting rollback}} ~~~~
*{{rfplinks|1=NXcrypto}}
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)


:Hi {{u|NXcrypto}}, please undo ] and respond to {{u|Worldbruce}}'s concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but {{u|Worldbruce}} was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of ] indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and ] from the conflict. ] (]) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
-->
::Reverted and replied on both venues, talk page and article talk page. Thanks. ] <small><small>]</small></small> 00:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC)


====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Cmrc23}}
Hello! I've been patrolling Recent Changes for a few months now. Rollback will help my work, especially when I'm out and about and can only access the app. ] 15:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)


:I want to note that I am currently recieving CVU training ] and am willing to apply again later if it is felt that I am not yet ready for this permission. I would also greatly appreciate any guidence (especially on that page). ] 13:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:: {{ping|Zippybonzo}} Do you think Cmrc23 is ready for this? ] ] 16:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
:::I feel that they can understand the difference between bad faith and good faith edits and also those that are damaging and not damaging, however I'm a little concerned about their choices of how to warn a user in some cases. I'd suggest a trial for a month and I'll work with them on when to use warnings and which warnings to use when (bit of a tongue twister), and the use of semi automated tools for anti-vandalism. Assuming they make good progress on that front I'd be happy endorsing a permanent grant of rollback. ] &#124; ] &#124; ] (they/them) 17:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
:::: Okay then. Granted temporarily for a month ({{done}} for bot). ] ] 18:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)


====]==== ====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Randomdude121}}
*{{Usercheck-short|TheIntersect}} (])
Hi! Though I started out doing grammar fixes, over the past 2 weeks, I've been using ] and ] to revert any vandalism seen on ]. It's understandable if you'd like to impose the hard and fast rule of 1-month experience, but I've made almost 300 edits related to vandalism. I always leave a message for the editor and undo my revert in cases where I question my decision in hindsight and would rather have another pair of eyes look at the edit(s).
:I have been reverting vandalism using Undo and Twinkle however they are considerably slower compared with rollback. ] (]) 22:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


Having the rollback permission would make ] reverting faster for me and would also allow me to try out other anti-vandalism tools like ]. Could I have the right please? ] (]) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
⚫ ====]====

*{{Usercheck-short|ruby.red.roses}} (])
:While I have been using Twinkle to revert vandalism the best I can, rollback is still required to have Huggle, an application that would greatly aid me in my attempts to stop vandalism by allowing me to work at much greater speeds. ] (]) 00:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC) :Hi {{u|Randomdude121}}, I'll grant this without expiry, but with an expectation of you please, please going slowly with Huggle for the first weeks and asking rather than guessing when something is unclear. My talk page will always be open to questions even if you think they may seem silly. ] (]) 21:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
:{{done}} ] (]) 21:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

====]====
*{{rfplinks|1=Fishy-Finns}}
Hi, I would like rollback so I can more efficiently fight obvious vandalism and I will use it responsibly and will always assume good faith. I have over 200 edits, but a few days under a month of reverting experience on recent changes, but please let that slide because it includes around 50 good quality reverts with pretty consistent and accurate warnings on talk pages. I only revert very obvious vandalism currently, and that's what I will do if granted with rollback, so I doubt I would suddenly decide to abuse my power if granted. Thanks for the consideration ] (]) 18:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
: {{not done}} I probably would let a few days under a month slide if you were actively recent changes patrolling for all of that month minus few days, but all I see is a short stint of RC patrol in early December and another short stint a few days ago, which isn't really enough experience for this. Feel free to reapply with more activity. ] ] 16:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:40, 29 December 2024

Place to request rollback rights
Requests for permissions
Common
Uncommon
Logs
Special
This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old.

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please review Misplaced Pages:Rollback before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have:
  1. At least 200 mainspace edits.
  2. At least a month of experience patrolling Special:RecentChanges.
  3. No recent history of edit warring.
  4. A track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits.
The counter-vandalism training program is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism.

User:NXcrypto

I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi NXcrypto, please undo Special:Diff/1265567139 and respond to Worldbruce's concern. It doesn't look like the worst kind of edit warring I've ever seen, but Worldbruce was concerned about it without being involved in the reverting, so you should probably take a moment to address their concerns instead of throwing them away. The edit summary of Special:Diff/1265564114 indicates that their primary concern is you not (yet?) using the article's talk page. If that's true, perhaps change it or announce that you are not longer interested and disengage from the conflict. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Reverted and replied on both venues, talk page and article talk page. Thanks. Nxcrypto Message 00:18, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Cmrc23

Hello! I've been patrolling Recent Changes for a few months now. Rollback will help my work, especially when I'm out and about and can only access the app. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

I want to note that I am currently recieving CVU training on this page and am willing to apply again later if it is felt that I am not yet ready for this permission. I would also greatly appreciate any guidence (especially on that page). Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 13:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
@Zippybonzo: Do you think Cmrc23 is ready for this? * Pppery * it has begun... 16:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
I feel that they can understand the difference between bad faith and good faith edits and also those that are damaging and not damaging, however I'm a little concerned about their choices of how to warn a user in some cases. I'd suggest a trial for a month and I'll work with them on when to use warnings and which warnings to use when (bit of a tongue twister), and the use of semi automated tools for anti-vandalism. Assuming they make good progress on that front I'd be happy endorsing a permanent grant of rollback. Zippybonzo | talk | contribs (they/them) 17:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Okay then. Granted temporarily for a month ( Done for bot). * Pppery * it has begun... 18:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Randomdude121

Hi! Though I started out doing grammar fixes, over the past 2 weeks, I've been using Twinkle and RedWarn to revert any vandalism seen on Special:RecentChanges. It's understandable if you'd like to impose the hard and fast rule of 1-month experience, but I've made almost 300 edits related to vandalism. I always leave a message for the editor and undo my revert in cases where I question my decision in hindsight and would rather have another pair of eyes look at the edit(s).

Having the rollback permission would make RedWarn reverting faster for me and would also allow me to try out other anti-vandalism tools like Huggle. Could I have the right please? randomdude121 (leave a message!) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi Randomdude121, I'll grant this without expiry, but with an expectation of you please, please going slowly with Huggle for the first weeks and asking rather than guessing when something is unclear. My talk page will always be open to questions even if you think they may seem silly. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Fishy-Finns

Hi, I would like rollback so I can more efficiently fight obvious vandalism and I will use it responsibly and will always assume good faith. I have over 200 edits, but a few days under a month of reverting experience on recent changes, but please let that slide because it includes around 50 good quality reverts with pretty consistent and accurate warnings on talk pages. I only revert very obvious vandalism currently, and that's what I will do if granted with rollback, so I doubt I would suddenly decide to abuse my power if granted. Thanks for the consideration Fishy-Finns (talk) 18:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I probably would let a few days under a month slide if you were actively recent changes patrolling for all of that month minus few days, but all I see is a short stint of RC patrol in early December and another short stint a few days ago, which isn't really enough experience for this. Feel free to reapply with more activity. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Category: