Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jack Merridew: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:44, 17 December 2008 editJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits read Joe R. Lansdale's work← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:34, 6 January 2023 edit undoSteel1943 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors196,777 edits Notification: listing of Bigun at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle 
Line 1: Line 1:
This user's current account is;
<div style="position: absolute; top: -1.5em; left: 20em; width: size: 150px; z-index: 1000;">
]
</div>
{{User:Jack Merridew/Prologue}}


{{softredirect|User:Br'er Rabbit}} ; )
<div style="position: relative; top: 0px; left: 0px;">
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
==MfD nomination of ]==
], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 23:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of Template:Blenheim Palace overhead1 ==
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 18:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]


The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<div style="position: absolute; left: -18px; top: -9px;">
<blockquote>This isn't even about mobile payments in Indonesia, it's about a particular vendor of credit for mobile phones and the services they offer. Said vendor fails ] due to ] in ], ] sources. Its products fail the ] and the ] on the same basis.</blockquote>
<div style="width: auto; background-color: #fafafa; margin-top: 3px; border: 1px solid #976684; padding: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0 6px;">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1px;">
This user is a sock puppet
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>


While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].
<div style="position: absolute; right: -5px; top: -9px;">
<div style="width: auto; background-color: #fafafa; margin-top: 3px; border: 1px solid #976684; padding: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0 6px;">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1px;">
''Cheers''
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>


You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color: #e8dae7; border: 1px solid #976684; vertical-align: top;"
| style="background-color: #fff4fa; border: 1px solid #976684; border-right-width: 2px; border-bottom-width: 2px; text-align: center;" | '''All users are equal,''' '''''but some users are more equal than others.'''''
|-
| style="background-color: #fff4fa; border: 1px solid #976684; border-right-width: 2px; border-bottom-width: 2px; vertical-align: top;" |


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> '''<span style="font-family: Arial">] ]</span>''' 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
<div style="border-style: solid; border-color: #7f7f7f; border-width: 1px 2px 2px 1px; padding: 6px; background-color: #f9f9f9; width: 300px; margin-top: 6px; margin-left: 6px; font-size: 10pt; text-align: left; float: right; clear: right;">
; Recommended reading;
: ],
:: by ]
: ]:<br /><small>''The Destruction of Islam’s City of Tolerance''</small>
:: by ]
::*
:: reviews;
::*
::*
::*
::*
: ]
: ]
: ]
: ]
:: by ]
: ]
:: by ]
</div>


: Did you know for how long the editor is banned, sadly? - Lovely edit notice, no? --] (]) 11:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
* ], ]
__TOC__
<div style="clear: both;"></div>
{{User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses}}
== your mission should you choose to accept it..... ==


{{User QAIbox
I thought you may be amused by ]:
| title = Awesome

| image = Cscr-featured.svg
I guess along the lines of pop culture, some editors were bemused at the obscurity of many hooks that appear on the main page. I have on my travels seen plenty of more notable stubs which could be expanded five-fold, which I thought would be interesting to expand and place on the main page. I think I will copy this archived stuff into my userspace anyway, but held a (largely aborted) competition to highlight/find some more notable material that is too stubby and too expanded. I guess this is my way of addressing systemic bias (though with carrots rather than sticks). Your own personal mission, should you choose to accept, it is to find the most notable indonesian/balinese stubs to expand 5-fold and get onto the main page. Your skill with prose and thoroughness with referencing should make this easy. It is funny to see how a selection of contributors modifies the ] of article creation, so for a while, rather than a spread of random articles, there were overrepresented birds, fungi, medieval Chinese figures, miscellaneous North American synagogues, and lots of US historical houses. ''Definitely'' needs more third world mateiral. Also, there is systemic bias in the birds wikiproject with a definite anglophone preponderance, so if you run across anything interesting from a local perspective avianwise that might make a good DYK, GA or even FA. Anyway, all this is presuming the arb works out...Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 11:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
| image_upright = 0.35

| bold = ]
== ] ==
}}

--] (]) 06:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
The above-linked ban review has been closed and a motion passed. You have been unblocked, conditional to the restrictions and mentorship arrangement set out in the motion, available in full at ]. The three mentors assigned are {{user|Casliber}}, {{user|Jayvdb}} and {{user|Moreschi}}.
== "Bigun" listed at ] ==

]
For the Arbitration Committee,<br />] (]) 10:03, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at {{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 6#Bigun}} until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 20:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

: ''Terima kasih'' (id:thank you), Daniel. Others, too, of course. Cheers, ] 10:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

:: Yes, I can see what you mean about ], ] etc and ''common'' boards (I would think it'd apply to ''threads'' rather than the whole board as such. Need to clarify that with the arb committee I think. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 04:23, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

::: Ya, me-thinks so; user talk page, too. Cheers, ] 04:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

== Hello ==

Welcome back Jack. --] (]) 15:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

: Thank you. ] 15:37, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back. In the spirit of the upcoming season, I'm hoping for peace on Earth; hopefully we'll at least have peace with you this time? Hope springs eternal, you know. :) ] (]) 16:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

:: Thirded (if that's a word?). Also, as Eleanor Roosevelt said, "Learn from the mistakes of others, life's too short to make them all yourself," i.e. I have found that editing in new areas that I did not previously edit in seems to get positive feedback, whereas old whatever you want to call them have a tendency to be well you know in the areas I used to focus on. Best, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 16:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Uh, the upcoming season here is ''the wet season…'' but I get it. BOZ, I am going to offer a view on Gavin's RfC, however I'm not going to focus on D&D nearly as much (''unencyclopaedic'', and all). I will vigorously oppose D&D's ] ], if necessary; that's always been a key reason for my involvement there.

''Nobody'', I am focused on editing in a wider range of areas; ]? I have not been 'gone', I have better than 10,000 edits while on holiday from en:wp; ]?

Cheers, ] 04:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

: Hey Jack. :) It's good that you would step in to help against "He Who Must Not Be Named Because He Loves To Hear His Name And That Makes Him Show Up"; however, I always assumed he was doing what he was doing to D&D articles more to annoy you (and to a lesser extent, Jeske and Gavin) than because he wanted the templates gone (although I'm sure he wanted that also). Regardless, I haven't seen any clear ''evidence'' (not the same as him not being there) of him getting involved in D&D articles in that same way while you were gone from here, whether or not that backs up my theory. I ''have'' seen evidence that he has been around, moving pages to nonsense titles before someone moves it back ( comes to mind, for example) so we all need to keep an eye out. The best way to handle that is, as always, revert the change if you can, then let an admin know so they can block and semi-protect. Carry on! :)
: I see you've been doing a lot of good work. Carry on with that as well! :) (But yeah, I'm sure it's not as wet here as it is on an island, but we've got plenty of slush and snow, so wet it is.) ] (]) 15:30, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

]
:: The ] ] needs to get laid. If he thinks he's annoyed me, he's way off; he's kinda fun to beat-up on ;) See my ] and compare the timing circa 2005 with ]; I was reading the rfar pages quite assiduously back in the day. I also understand the entomology of his usersname. The D&D crowd needs to quite clearly disown their patron vandal. Comments like ("Giving him ]] the Grawp treatment seems to be the only way to get anything done") amount to an endorsement of such disruptive behavior. As the meme goes, ''he's got over 9,000 cockpuppets;'' how sure are you that a few of them aren't of the ] variety?

:: I have no idea where you are; I'd speculate that it would be the northern United States, but that's just what you seem to be implying. Here's it always about 27°C (a bit over 80°F) and breezy and not very humid, even in the heavy rains. It rains about every other afternoon for an hour or so; most often late at night and early in the morning. This is the season when stuff grows at an amazing rate. Cheers, ] 05:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

::: Well, partly to annoy you, and partly just to get his kicks. ;) If he hasn't been around to bother you lately, then that can only be a good thing (unless it just means he's moved on to someone else). I do remember JA fighting any little edit he didn't agree with to one of "his" articles, so that was certainly no fun. Advocating JA/G's (heh) seriously overt bad behavior is certainly not where I'm coming from, and I've been ''trying'' (god help me) to be as cool and calm and productive as I can to hopefully inspire others to do the same. Although before JA's block he was contributing ''some'' decent work to the project, he hasn't contributed anything useful since then and I would hope the majority opinion of our project reflects that. Anyway, sounds beautiful where you're at - want to trade? :) ] (]) 16:49, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

:::: No-trade; fuck winter. I wear sandals every day; ''Summer, Day 1307.''
:::: I have a dim view of WikiProjects; all of them. When you say 'project' you mean WP:D&D, when I use the word 'project' I mean an encyclopaedia that doesn't suck. In an even broader sense, I mean all of the WMF projects. I have more edits elsewhere than here. You're a Single Project Account. Think about it. WikiProjects are a self-selecting group and often they have WP:OWNership agendas, and amount to attempts to seceed from the real project. A lot of WikiProject will morph into WikiaProjects. That's what Pixel's so afreaid of. Cheers, ] 13:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

: Jack, please do not use any variation or allusion to my old username (please see the note on the top of my talk page why). Anyway, yes, I see that you have been doing some other good stuff and I believe that is why you are back. I am hoping to help Durova bring some rock articles out of stub status and maybe even get some good article contributions as well as my usual welcoming and rescue efforts. All the best! Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 00:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

:: Done; see my userpage and the ] at the bottom. I believe in acknowledging one's history. I can see that some RL issue may be at play here, in you case. I've not missed your history of late; let me offer a bit of advice: read ] and ]. You really need to accept that your approach to AfDs and RfAs is problematic. The wiki ''does'' discriminate against ] all the time. Judging an admin candidate solely on your perception of their views on inclusion criteria is a colossal assumption of bad faith. I, for example, would not close an AfD on an article about cruft as delete, I'd let someone else do it, as my doing it would only inspire others to go disrupt DRV.
:: Want a project? Get ] up to FA status. <sub style="opacity: 0.3;">terima kasih, John</sub> Cheers, ] 05:55, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

==New Assignments==
Given your unique perspective of being (a) intelligent (b) bahasa-speaking, you may have some opinion on the balance of articles such as ]. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 14:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Also, maybe constructively reviewing articles at ] or ] maybe good. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 14:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

== My ] is too fat ==

Weird - it looked fine yesterday but has now gone too wide for some reason - can you see what is amiss? Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 00:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

: Fixed; ]. Cheers, ] 07:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

==Regarding Wikia==
I do recall reading several of your comments about Wikia at the E&C2 workshop, but I also recall several mentions of Wikia at the ] and particularly at ] before E&C2 opened. I also recall being contacted last December about the Wikia Annex, along with several other editors, including you &mdash; although it was later ] that that editor was a sockpuppet of Grawp. And yes, the Wikia Annex was mentioned in E&C2.

I'm sure your comments had some influence on me, but I've been looking into the matter more and more. You may be interested in reading ] from me on my talk page, which refers to an email by the CEO of Wikia, Inc in June as well as an article in ''The Guardian''. Basically, ] (]) and ] (]) founded Wikicities, a for-profit wiki, in late 2004. In March 2005, the Misplaced Pages Board of Trustees, which Angela was on, suggested a user create a Star Wars wiki there. Angela has edited several ] on Misplaced Pages. In March 2006, Wikicities was renamed Wikia and the official press release on March 27, 2006 mentioned Wookieepedia. Also on March 27, 2006, ] was created, and it plugged Wookieepedia. On June 16, 2006, WAF was marked a guideline, and WAF ''continues'' to plug Wookieepedia to this day &mdash; including several other Wikia sites. Thirteen days later, ] was proposed based on ]. ] was added to NOT on July 9, 2006, and PLOT encourages the deletion of articles that are just plot summaries &mdash; which includes articles about scores of fictional characters. ] mentioned Wikia from August 2007 to March 2008 &mdash; during the span of E&C1 and E&C2. I've already noted that TTN, a central figure in E&C1 and E&C2, is apparently an editor at xiaolinshowdown.wikia.com as well as gaming.wikia.com.

press release from 2007 by the ] states that Wikia, Inc. is not the commercial counterpart to Misplaced Pages or the Wikimedia Foundation. However, several Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines currently promote Wikia, and have for some time. So Wikia has leverage. I am thinking of proposing a Misplaced Pages policy on how to deal with Wikia at ]. If that ever happens, your input would be welcome. --] (]) 20:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

== Countering systemic bias #65 - bird folklore ==

One thing that might be kinda fun, I have been trying to counteract the anglosaxon bias of bird folklore (I love how various cultures have interpreted their little critters)

*So ] has the obligatory material, as do many other english birds etc. I have hunted some aboriginal material to embellish aussie birds such as ] and others, but thought it may be good if you found anything in bahasa or knew of some local folklore, I have some books on parrots of the world and some SE asian birds, so whipping up a DYK from a stub is easy-peasy, plus we get some 3rd world folklore into it - if you find something interesting....let me know the species/bird. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 12:07, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

:# my bahasa sucks; I recognize maybe one in 20 words.
:# 'burung' is bird, as in flu burung; also a nasty computer virus from ] separatists.
:# most of the birds I see here, and hear here, are chickens.
::# 'ayam' is chicken; tastes like chicken, too.
::# a very common pastime is…
<blockquote style="border-style: solid; border-color: #7f7f7f; border-width: 1px 2px 2px 1px; background-color: #f9f9f9; padding: .5em 1em;">
; Balinese men sure do love their cocks!
<p>
In the early evening they take them out, stroke and fondle them, croon to them and sometimes play “my cock’s better than your cock″ by the side of the road along with their Balinese companions. To a visitor from the west, one cock looks pretty much like another cock. After all, to most westerners, a rooster’s just a hen with a bad attitude.
</p>
<p>
Cockfighting (or at least the betting on them) is illegal in Indonesia. At least there’s a law against it someplace on some law book. Nobody seems to know where that place is or what law book. It has something to do with practicing one’s religion. If you need to throw a rooster at another rooster and good money after bad in your quest for a better relationship with god(s), you’re golden. You can do roosters. And wagering.
</p>
<p>
Roosters are kept separated from each other (so they don’t do freelance fighting when you have no money on the outcome) in cock cages. You’ll see them everywhere, often right outside your room. Cocks in cages awaken as early as cocks ranging free, and they are just as enthusiastic in announcing the dawn. When choosing a place to sleep, keep a sharp eye out for hive-shaped baskets with grown-up chickens inside.
</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">
— a tale from a website that never launched
</p>
</blockquote>

:: I can get pictures ;)
:: I also have a dove that lives just outside my bathroom window; there's a bit of roof over it and the nest is perched on the support.
:: Cheers, ] 12:41, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Aha --> ] ( they don't look balinese in the top image though) a agood place to embellish the SE asian bit (and fix some foramtting gaffes). Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 12:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

==]==
This topic is an interesting one and your addition of it to Misplaced Pages is welcome. However I notice that you have peremptorily removed the merge proposal which I suggested without allowing time for other editors to comment and with the "''silliness sorted''". As I understand it, you seem to be describing the merge proposal as ''silliness''. This seems improper in that it obscures the nature of your edit and is uncivil to boot. Please explain or retract your imputation.

Having engaged with this topic, I may well make further contributions to it, as discussed on the article's talk page. My main concerns at the moment are that we should be using English to describe this topic, rather than using the Balinese language, and that the presentation should be neutral in describing the clash between the Dutch and the Balinese. Such issues of nationalist NPOV can be tricky to resolve and so we should strive to proceed in an open and amicable way. ] (]) 12:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

:''(sigh)'' yeah, be careful Jack...keep it all positive :) Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 12:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

== reverting Moulton ==

Hi... I strongly suggest you leave to others... at least for now anyway. Your best course of action (after coming off a recent indef block) is to stay away from all drama as much as possible. Being involved with Giano is a high drama activity regardless of what "side" you are on... it's ] in there if you ask me. ++]: ]/] 16:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

:Yep, I can for recently ''(now to rummage round for linkies)''. Cheers, ] (] '''·''' ]) 19:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

* Point taken; thank you, guys. I'll go read it all without comment. I'm on the wiki's side Cheers, ] 06:27, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Speaking of ], I've read ] somewhere before; it amounts to digging a deep pit and throwing some folks in along with somewhat fewer knives. Sheesh, ] 07:44, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

==Fix code==
See request on my talk page. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 10:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:34, 6 January 2023

This user's current account is;

Soft redirect to:User:Br'er Rabbit
This page is a soft redirect. ; )

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses

User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Blood and Roses during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:41, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic

User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Body text

User:Jack Merridew/Body text, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Body text and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Body text during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch

User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Quote switch during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jack Merridew/Quotes

User:Jack Merridew/Quotes, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jack Merridew/Quotes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jack Merridew/Quotes during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:59, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Blenheim Palace overhead1

Template:Blenheim Palace overhead1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mobile payments in Indonesia

Notice

The article Mobile payments in Indonesia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't even about mobile payments in Indonesia, it's about a particular vendor of credit for mobile phones and the services they offer. Said vendor fails corporate notability guidelines due to insufficient depth of coverage in independent, reliable sources. Its products fail the product notability guidelines and the general notability guideline on the same basis.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 11:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Did you know for how long the editor is banned, sadly? - Lovely edit notice, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

"Bigun" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Bigun and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 6 § Bigun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Category: