| Revision as of 19:08, 22 December 2008 editEl Sandifer (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,527 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:28, 7 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | ||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
| The result was '''Speedy close as keep'''. Querrelous and ] nomination. ] (]) 19:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | The result was '''Speedy close as keep'''. Querrelous and ] nomination. ] (]) 19:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bowles}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bowles}}</ul></div> | ||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :{{la|Tim Bowles}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Tim Bowles}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Same as with ], no reliable third-party sources really discuss the subject himself, only his activities on behalf of an organization. The sources are all about Scientology and related litigation, not Tim Bowles as a person. ] 16:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | Same as with ], no reliable third-party sources really discuss the subject himself, only his activities on behalf of an organization. The sources are all about Scientology and related litigation, not Tim Bowles as a person. ] 16:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''', querulous re-re-re-renomination - ] (]) 18:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep''', querulous re-re-re-renomination - ] (]) 18:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''', after one or two AfDs, I can understand the merit for re-nomination. But a fifth nomination? The consensus is clearly to keep. ]< |
*'''Speedy keep''', after one or two AfDs, I can understand the merit for re-nomination. But a fifth nomination? The consensus is clearly to keep. ]]] 18:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Not only is this the 5th nomination of the article, the article also blatantly tells the guy is notable: "He is the executive director of ], and is a Commissioner on the Board of Advisors of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, both Church of Scientology sponsored organizations." That's verifiable. -]|] 19:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Not only is this the 5th nomination of the article, the article also blatantly tells the guy is notable: "He is the executive director of ], and is a Commissioner on the Board of Advisors of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, both Church of Scientology sponsored organizations." That's verifiable. -]|] 19:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Latest revision as of 04:28, 7 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy close as keep. Querrelous and pointy nomination. Phil Sandifer (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:Tim Bowles
- Tim Bowles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Same as with Michelle Stith, no reliable third-party sources really discuss the subject himself, only his activities on behalf of an organization. The sources are all about Scientology and related litigation, not Tim Bowles as a person. *** Crotalus *** 16:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, querulous re-re-re-renomination - David Gerard (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, after one or two AfDs, I can understand the merit for re-nomination. But a fifth nomination? The consensus is clearly to keep. ←Spidern→ 18:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Not only is this the 5th nomination of the article, the article also blatantly tells the guy is notable: "He is the executive director of Youth for Human Rights International, and is a Commissioner on the Board of Advisors of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, both Church of Scientology sponsored organizations." That's verifiable. -Mgm| 19:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.