Misplaced Pages

User talk:Knotslanding: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:10, 25 December 2008 editOnly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users32,384 edits →3RR warning: reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:40, 15 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(54 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
# ] # ]
# ] # ]
# ]
}} }}
== Your edit to ] ==


== Protected ==
Your edit to the ] article removed a {{tl|fact}} tag without adding the requested ]. Please do not remove maintenance tags from articles without actually resolving the issue at hand. --] (]) 15:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


I have protected your talk page as you are clearly abusing the unblock process by merely copying and pasting the same rationale despite being shown where you have violated 3RR. Also, ] is very clear that the reverts do not have to be to the same content. --]] 06:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
⚫ :: I removed the tag since the information was changed. ] (]) 21:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


:::: Whatever. You know damn well I did not violate the 3RR rule. but whatever either way had NO BUSINESS even sticking their nose in the monorail article. But yet they kept on harassing me until they convinced other s that I was a danger and got me blocked. This it to either way and the other so called moderators that came in harassed me on the 24th of Dec. DO NOT TALK TO ME, DO NOT LEAVE MESSAGES IN MY TALK PAGE. I WILL NOT READ THEM AND I WILL DELETE THEM. If you have something to say. go tell it to your little group of friends. ] (]) 22:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
== 3RR warning ==


== Blocked ==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Walt Disney World Monorail System|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 21:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


Knotslanding, you have been warned by several administrators that your behaviour is not acceptable (cf. , and ). Despite this ''clear'' warnings, you started edit warring immediately after your block on the same article again (). In addition to that, your are clearly violating ]: , . This behaviour (edit warring and incivility) can not be tolerated. Thus, I am going to block you for 3 days. If you continue behaving like this in the future, this ''will'' result in an indefinite block. — <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span>&nbsp;] 22:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
⚫ ::: I am not in an edit war and have not changed an edit more then 3 times. So you can drop your 3RR warning.] (]) 22:12, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
⚫ ::::WHOA. Wait a min. Who are you? someone that has NOTHING to do with this article. Don't come in here throwing out warnings to me when you have NO IDEA whats going on. ] (]) 22:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


:Oh Bull. This is crap and I am going to file a report on you as well for this. I have done NOTHING wrong and you know it. What the heck are you either ways little pimp when they go around harassing people, you step in and block the person for fighting back? I will be making phone calls about this. You both are abuse of power. ] (]) 22:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
:, , . Three reverts so far. Further reverts and edit warring will result in a block, ] (]) 22:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


::But not all at the some time. I mean heck by your views everyone is in violation of 3RR if they make more then 3 edits EVER. Again I say, Don't come in here throwing out warnings to me when you have NO IDEA whats going on.] (]) 22:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC) :: In 3 days I WILL come back and RE FIX the incorrect information in the article. ] (]) 22:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
:::You might want to read ] so you know what's going on here. A revert is undoing someone else's edit. You were reverting other editors when you made those edits. You were undoing their work (i.e., NormalVisual's namings, Kralizec!'s taggings) which is a revert. ] (]) 22:25, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


:::Sorry, but that is not the case. As has been stated before ''HeadMouse'', your ] are not welcome here. --] (]) 23:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
::::: I know what the 3RR rule is and I am '''''not''''' in violation of it. So again, '''Don't come in here throwing out warnings to me when you have NO IDEA whats going on.''' And I will say this if '''I''' am getting the 3RR warning then NormalVisual should too as they changed the article and I went in and fixed it back, then they changed it back 2-3 times again. so if anyone is in violation it's them. ] (]) 02:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
::::::NormalVisual has only edited the article twice. Only one of these seems to be a revert, so no warning is warranted. You, on the other hand, have reverted three times, as laid out in the diffs above, ] (]) 03:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


⚫ ::::You keep talking but fail to listen.'''Don't come in here throwing out warnings to me when you have NO IDEA whats going on.'''] (]) 04:04, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
:::::And you keep failing to listen too. You made three reverts. A further revert would earn a block. I read your edit summaries, I read the diffs, and I read the uncivil comments and rants on the talk page of the article. I have more than "no idea" about what's going on here, ] (]) 04:07, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


::::: Must be nice to think you know everything. But I hate to break it to you. I am not "head mouse". It seems to me that ANYONE that comes into the article and puts in valid information and tried to keep it there is assumed to be "head mouse" without any positive proof or evidence. Other then the fact that both persons have fought to keep the article correct, you have nothing linking me to them. Wait, I know whats going to happen now. your going to claim that you have done a trace on the computes and that we both use that same computer. Well again I hate to break it to you, but i have been on 3 different computers that past week. So that excuse won't work. You are wrong and you know it. What are you going to do to the next poor person that comes in trying to fix the article. you going to ban them too and say they are head mouse? You really need to grow up and get over yourself. ] (]) 23:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
::::::The 3 edits you posted are NOT a 3RR violation. 2 of them are similar but not the same, one is a totally different edit therefore breaking the chain of 3 undo's in a row. You really need to go back and read the 3RR rules again.] (]) 04:09, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

:::::::The reverts do not have to be of the same content. They can be reverts of different content each time within the same article. ] (]) 04:10, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
== Good bye ==
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''{{{reason}}}'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:y|] (]) 23:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->



⚫ EXCUSE ME???? Sock puppet???? I don't think so. REMOVE THIS NOW!! ] (]) 23:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


{{unblock reviewed|I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET OF ANYONE. THIS BLOCK NEEDS TO BE REMOVED.|decline=Uh, no. And the legal threat below is noteworthy. <small>] &#x007C; ] &#x007C; ]</small> 23:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)}}

⚫ I will be making phone calls about this Monday morning. ] (]) 23:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
:Is that a legal threat as well? --]] 23:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


⚫ Did I say I was calling an lawyer??? Jesus Christ you people try to start trouble don't you. I will be calling Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 23:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


{{unblock reviewed|1=I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET. THIS ACCUSATION IS IN VALID WITH NO PROOF. THIS BLOCK IN UNJUST AS WELL.|decline=You just happen to have the same incivility and SPA attitude on the same article as HeadMouse. Plus, your incivility and continued edit warring and above notice that you would not stop edit warring are enough in and of themselves to block you indefinitely. — ]] 23:25, 26 December 2008 (UTC)}}


⚫ :::: So because there is more then one person in the world that wants to see this article with correct information, then they MUST all be the same person. Until you have proof that I am a sock puppet then this block in unjust. ] (]) 23:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


{{unblock reviewed|1=There has been no proof or evidence shown that I am a sock puppet. Until such proof or evidence is provide, this block in unjust.|decline=Even without that, you all but say you have every intention to continue edit warring. Sorry, we don't need this here. Talk page protected.— ]] 01:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)}}

Latest revision as of 21:40, 15 February 2023

Archiving icon
Archives
  1. /Archive 1
  2. /Archive 2
  3. /Archive 3

Protected

I have protected your talk page as you are clearly abusing the unblock process by merely copying and pasting the same rationale despite being shown where you have violated 3RR. Also, WP:3RR is very clear that the reverts do not have to be to the same content. --Smashville 06:32, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Whatever. You know damn well I did not violate the 3RR rule. but whatever either way had NO BUSINESS even sticking their nose in the monorail article. But yet they kept on harassing me until they convinced other s that I was a danger and got me blocked. This it to either way and the other so called moderators that came in harassed me on the 24th of Dec. DO NOT TALK TO ME, DO NOT LEAVE MESSAGES IN MY TALK PAGE. I WILL NOT READ THEM AND I WILL DELETE THEM. If you have something to say. go tell it to your little group of friends. Knotslanding (talk) 22:00, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

Knotslanding, you have been warned by several administrators that your behaviour is not acceptable (cf. , and ). Despite this clear warnings, you started edit warring immediately after your block on the same article again (). In addition to that, your are clearly violating WP:CIVIL: , . This behaviour (edit warring and incivility) can not be tolerated. Thus, I am going to block you for 3 days. If you continue behaving like this in the future, this will result in an indefinite block. — Aitias // discussion 22:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh Bull. This is crap and I am going to file a report on you as well for this. I have done NOTHING wrong and you know it. What the heck are you either ways little pimp when they go around harassing people, you step in and block the person for fighting back? I will be making phone calls about this. You both are abuse of power. Knotslanding (talk) 22:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
In 3 days I WILL come back and RE FIX the incorrect information in the article. Knotslanding (talk) 22:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, but that is not the case. As has been stated before HeadMouse, your sockpuppets are not welcome here. --Kralizec! (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Must be nice to think you know everything. But I hate to break it to you. I am not "head mouse". It seems to me that ANYONE that comes into the article and puts in valid information and tried to keep it there is assumed to be "head mouse" without any positive proof or evidence. Other then the fact that both persons have fought to keep the article correct, you have nothing linking me to them. Wait, I know whats going to happen now. your going to claim that you have done a trace on the computes and that we both use that same computer. Well again I hate to break it to you, but i have been on 3 different computers that past week. So that excuse won't work. You are wrong and you know it. What are you going to do to the next poor person that comes in trying to fix the article. you going to ban them too and say they are head mouse? You really need to grow up and get over yourself. Knotslanding (talk) 23:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Good bye

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kralizec! (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


EXCUSE ME???? Sock puppet???? I don't think so. REMOVE THIS NOW!! Knotslanding (talk) 23:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knotslanding (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET OF ANYONE. THIS BLOCK NEEDS TO BE REMOVED.

Decline reason:

Uh, no. And the legal threat below is noteworthy. seicer | talk | contribs 23:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will be making phone calls about this Monday morning. Knotslanding (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Is that a legal threat as well? --Smashville 23:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Did I say I was calling an lawyer??? Jesus Christ you people try to start trouble don't you. I will be calling Misplaced Pages. Knotslanding (talk) 23:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knotslanding (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM NOT A SOCK PUPPET. THIS ACCUSATION IS IN VALID WITH NO PROOF. THIS BLOCK IN UNJUST AS WELL.

Decline reason:

You just happen to have the same incivility and SPA attitude on the same article as HeadMouse. Plus, your incivility and continued edit warring and above notice that you would not stop edit warring are enough in and of themselves to block you indefinitely. — Smashville 23:25, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


So because there is more then one person in the world that wants to see this article with correct information, then they MUST all be the same person. Until you have proof that I am a sock puppet then this block in unjust. Knotslanding (talk) 23:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Knotslanding (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There has been no proof or evidence shown that I am a sock puppet. Until such proof or evidence is provide, this block in unjust.

Decline reason:

Even without that, you all but say you have every intention to continue edit warring. Sorry, we don't need this here. Talk page protected.— Blueboy96 01:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.