| Revision as of 05:07, 8 January 2009 editAbd (talk | contribs)14,259 edits →Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist: please make this objection moot.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:35, 10 December 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,789 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:JzG/Archive 218) (botTag: Manual revert |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
|
{{tinc}} |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{|class="messagebox" |
|
|
|
| archiveheader = {{talkarchive}} |
|
|- |
|
|
|
| algo = old(7d) |
|
| ] |
|
|
|
| archive = User talk:JzG/Archive %(counter)d |
|
| This user is a member of the ''']''', a cabal so secret that not only am I not allowed to know who the other members are, I am not even allowed to know if there ''are'' any other members, and if I ever did find out that anyone else was a member I would have to kill them immediately. |
|
|
|
| counter = 218 |
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
| minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|
| maxarchivesize = 32K |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Misplaced Pages:TPS/banner}} |
|
|
{{collapse top|Discretionary sanctions}} |
|
|
{{Ds/aware|9/11|a-a|a-i|ab|acu|aerc|ap|at|os|b|blp|cam|cc|cid|e|ecig|fg|gc|gg|ggtf|gap|gmo|ipa|lr|lw|muh-im|old|pa|pr|ps|r-i|saq|sen|sci|tm|tpm|tt|we}} |
|
|
{{collapse bottom}} |
|
|
] |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|target=User talk:JzG/Archive index|mask=User talk:JzG/Archive <#>|leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Centralized discussion|width=30%}} |
|
|
{{Archive box |
|
|
| archivelist = <!-- /archivelist --> |
|
|
| auto = yes |
|
|
| index = Special:PrefixIndex/User_talk:JzG/Archive |
|
|
| search = yes |
|
|
| collapsible = yes |
|
|
| collapsed = yes |
|
|
| root = user talk:JzG |
|
|
| bot = MiszaBot |
|
|
| age = 7 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|
|
<small>You can contact WUSIIC on #wikipedia-ultra-secret-inner-inner-cabal on Freenode. As a courtesy you are requested to kill yourself afterwards.</small> |
|
|
|} |
|
|
{{wikibreak|{{PAGENAME}}| after a few days.}} |
|
|
|
|
|
]] |
|
|
<center><div style="align: center; width: 60%; padding: 1em; border: solid 2px gold; background-color: black;"><br> |
|
|
<span style="color:white;font-weight:bold"><s>R E</s> T I R E D</font>'''</span></div><br></center> |
|
|
|
|
|
<center>'''This user is tired of silly drama on Misplaced Pages{{#if:{{{date|}}}| as of {{{date}}}|}}.'''<br> |
|
|
If you are going to ], please ] quickly and save time. Thank you so much.</center> |
|
|
|
|
|
{|align="right" width="160px" style="background-color: transparent;" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
|<div> |
|
|
{{boxboxtop|My crap}} |
|
|
<div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0; border-style: none;"> |
|
|
<div class="NavFrame" style="border-style: none; padding: 0;"> |
|
|
<div class="NavHead" style="background: #edf1f1; text-align: left; text-style: normal;"> |
|
|
Stuff and nonsense</div><div class="NavContent" style="display: none;"> |
|
|
{{SA-tutnumIV}}<br clear=both /> |
|
|
{{User wikipedia/Administrator}}<br clear=both /> |
|
|
{{User Meta-Wiki}}<br clear=both /> |
|
|
{{User mainspace edits|15,000}}<br clear=both /> |
|
|
{| cellspacing="0" style="width:238px; background:#96EAEE;" |
|
|
| style="width:45px; height:45px; background:#98B0F6; text-align:center; font-size:14pt; color:black;" | ''']''' |
|
|
| style="font-size:8pt; padding:4pt; line-height:1.25em; color:black; text-align:center;" | '''Smert' spamionem!'''<br />This user is a member of '''].''' |
|
|
|}<br clear=both /> |
|
|
{{User degree/BEng}}<br clear=both /> |
|
|
]'''.]]<br clear=both /> |
|
|
<div style="float:left; width:90px; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;border:1px solid #A9A9A9; background: #fff; text-align: center; padding:3px; font-size: smaller; line-height: 1.3; margin-right: 4px;"> |
|
|
<div style="width:100%; background:#808080">]</div> |
|
|
<div style="width: 100%;">{{#time:F Y|0 hours}}</div> |
|
|
<div style="font-size: x-large; width: 100%;"><span class="plainlinks" id="purgelink"></span></div> |
|
|
<div style="width:100%">{{#time:l|0 hours}}</div> |
|
|
<div style="background: #D3D3D3; color: #000;">'''{{#time:g|0 hours}}<span style="text-decoration:blink">:</span>{{#time:i a|0 hours}}''' ]</div> |
|
|
</div><!-- clock nicked from ] who nicked it from Ryulong. --><br clear=both /> |
|
|
{{User:Lucasbfr/Admin open to trout slapping}} |
|
|
]</sup>]] |
|
|
<!-- end of ubx float --> |
|
|
</div></div></div> |
|
|
{{boxboxbottom}} |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
|} |
|
|
I check in most evenings, and occasionally some days during the day. I am on UK time (I can see ] from my office). If you post a reply at 8pm EST and get no reply by 10pm, it's likely because I'm asleep. My wiki interests at the moment are limited. I still handle some ] tickets. |
|
|
|
|
|
{{quotation|'''Dispute resolution, Bible style''' - and actually an excellent model on Misplaced Pages as well.<br /> |
|
|
If your brother sins against you, go and show him his fault, just between the two of you. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over.<br /> |
|
|
But if he will not listen, take one or two others along, so that 'every matter may be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.'<br /> |
|
|
If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, treat him as you would a pagan or a tax collector.|Matthew 18:15}} |
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not try to provoke me to anger, it's not difficult to do, so it's not in the least bit clever, and experience indicates that some at least who deliberately make my life more miserable than it needs to be, have been banned and stayed that way. Make an effort to ] and let's see if we can't get along. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 22:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
* Please see ]. |
|
|
{{quotation|'''''the internets is populated by eggshells armed with hammers'''''}} |
|
|
---- |
|
---- |
|
|
;Smelling pistakes |
|
* Bored? Looking for something to do? Try ]. |
|
|
|
:In addition to bone-deep burn scars on my left hand I now also have ], so my typing is particularly erratic right now. I have a spellcheck plugin but it can't handle larger text blocks. You're welcome to fix spelling errors without pinging me, but please don't change British to American spelling or indeed vice-versa. |
|
* Really bored? Visit my website: http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk |
|
|
* ] - extremely interesting debate on what I feel is one of the worst problems on Misplaced Pages right now. |
|
|
---- |
|
---- |
|
|
{{wikibreak}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|
== God Jul och Gott Nytt År! == |
|
|algo = old(2d) |
|
|
|
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> |
|
|archive = User talk:JzG/Archives/%(monthname)s %(year)d |
|
|
|
] |
|
}} |
|
|
|
] |
|
---- |
|
|
|
] is wishing you ]<br />Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's ] or ]<br />], ], ], ], ],<br />or the ],<br /> this is a special time of year for (almost) everyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
<br /> |
|
== Note to self == |
|
|
|
{{clear}} |
|
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Istria&diff=192329190&oldid=189359747 |
|
|
|
|
|
== <3 == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div style="float:center; border-style:solid; border-color:green; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px; vertical-align: middle;" class="plainlinks">] |
|
|
<!--Begin message--> |
|
|
<font color="629632">]</font> <sup><font color="7733ff">]</font></sup> has given you a kitten! Kittens promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and keep up the excellent editing! Send '''kittens''' to others by adding {{tls|Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
|
|
</div> |
|
</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== ]! Are you still out there? == |
|
|
<!-- ] 09:57, 15 January 2032 (UTC) -->{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1957773473}} |
|
|
Hi ]! I was going through some old ArbCom cases and ran into one where you had added some statements. I realized that I haven't spoken to you in quite some time, and I see that you haven't made any edits since May... That sucks! I don't want to see someone like you go! If anything, I hope that you're doing well and that you're happy and that you'll someday return here. I just wanted to leave you a message and let you know that I was thinking about you... Keep in touch. :-) ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 23:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I hope it goes without saying, despite the fact that I'm saying it, that many of us feel the same way. Happy new year ]] 23:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
::We didn't cross paths very often lately, JzG, but we could really use you back. If you get the urge to return, please say "Yes!" <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:14, 15 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::October JzG sighting at ]. Does my heart good. --] (]) 20:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Lovely to hear from you! I have spent the past two-and-a-bit years working at incredibly high stress for a hospital. In that time I have retired around 80% of their legacy application and server estate, instituted architectural guidelines and piloted the process for demand review, reduced the measured risk burden by around 80%, instituted objective risk monitoring using ], and I've just proposed (and had accepted) a plan to remediate or mitigate most of the rest. I have, in short, been busy in that there real life of which you read, and that really wasn't going to fit in with having to be nice to people who sincerely believe that Ashlii Babbit was the real victim of the "legitimate political discourse" on Jan 6 2020. |
|
|
::::I have a week's leave. I have 28 days to take before year end, having managed I think three days off this year so far (including weekends). And because I have an offshore team and an onshore customer, my working day can be 8am to 3am. |
|
|
::::I thought I'd drop in :-) ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 18:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Yikes, sounds like, umm..., a lot of responsibility. There will be plenty for you to do here when you are free! ] (]) 22:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Glad you dropped by! ] (]) 02:19, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Glad to hear you're OK - and busy, by the sounds of things! Hope you enjoy your break. ]] 11:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::If Guy doesn't look at ] real soon now, where Eddy is being accused of plagiarism, I may be forced to contact him on bookfarce. That would mean giving Guy my real name. He always forgets me. - ]the ] 16:00, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::I try never to remember people's RW names unless they are "out" on Misplaced Pages. Even when they out themselves, this has led to huge problems, e.g. with a user whose identity was revealed by accident off-wiki, showing him to be the source of fact-washing his own side in Misplaced Pages disputes via a journalist. That ended badly for everyone. ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 16:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Very happy see the little JzG! ] ] ] 19:56, 27 October 2022 (UTC). |
|
|
:::::Hah! Good to see you're still around! ] 20:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::This is a few months late, but welcome back! Wishing you well. ''']] (])''' 09:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:Welcome indeed! Just came across your signature ]. It's always great to run in to another 'old-timer'. Hope you're well, ] <sup><b>(])</b></sup> 11:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
` |
|
|
|
|
== Cycling events == |
|
|
|
|
|
Argh - just realised you are a cycling fan anyway so removed this mini-rant ;-) |
|
|
|
|
|
== WP:ANI == |
|
|
|
|
|
Following your note ], can you remind him to stop things such as . -- User:Docu |
|
|
|
|
|
== Wikibreak == |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm taking a few days off, I have some things that a re filling my time and Misplaced Pages is (as always) an irresistable distraction. <b>]</b> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Again on Cold Fusion == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi JzG, sorry to bother you again, but it seems we have a little problem on it.wiki. BTW of the blacklisted site, there's an user that states there's also useful material, freely released by scientists who wrote about Cold Fusion, and asked for those documents to be whitelisted. Now the question is: have en.wiki either blacklisted the '''whole''' site or left some deeplinks to some given documents in white list (In other words: what do we lose in terms of knowledge if we blacklist that site)? Thanks again for your attention. '''] ]''' 18:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
* Some of it is not freely released, and much of it is heavily editorialised. It fails our reliable sourcing guidelines, and I would bet even money that it it is Jed Rothwell (the site owner) who is arguing for it. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 13:22, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
**Guy, that's an inappropriate comment, it's irrelevant who raised the issue. The use of a total advocacy site as a place to view released documents that were themselves from a reliable source is an appropriate use, provided the link is specific, i.e., just picks up the document and not the framing that may be placed by the site owner. (A more general pointing to a page that contains the document or a link to it ''might'' be proper, but is definitely more questionable.) The site might contain a *lot* of material that is inappropriate and unusable, but that should not prevent usage of what is appropriate. The needs of the project and of the readers should be paramount, and being able to read original articles serves both. Further, when the topic is the controversy, sometimes reference to advocacy sites is relevant, under some conditions, as a source that an attributed claim from a notable source was made. These are decisions, ultimately, to be made by consensus. --] (]) 15:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::* It's not inappropriate at all. Have you any idea how many times Jed Rothwell's promotion of his fringe views and site has had to be dealt with? <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:49, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:I do not know I if I really want to get involved with this issue, but it seems to me that enforcing "reliable sourcing guidelines" is a missuse of the SPAM blacklisting process. At a minimum it creates the impression that blacklisting is used to enforce a POV, or win edit wars. I hinted at the problem earlier on ]'s talk page: ]. I did not complain to you directly, as I did not think you were a party in this debate. Anyway, this is what I said earlier: |
|
|
::In these User {{User|JzG}} removed vital references from the article on ]. The first was the removal of the URL-line in an well formed {{tl|Citation}} template, the referred file being a PDF copy of a peer-reviewed paper in ''Physics Letters A'', available on-line at a cold fusion related repository lenr-canr.org. The second was the complete removal of the reference to the original press real, on-line at newenergytimes.com. I tried to restore the link and reference, but was prevented by the spam filter. I do not know what is happening here, but I find it very fishy. |
|
|
:-- ] (]) 13:56, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:: ''Vital'' references? I don't think so. Not when they are published on the hack website of a fringe group. Anything truly ''vital'' will be published in, and citable from, a ] rather than something like lenr-canr, which has been relentlessly spammed and promoted by the site owner to the point that he is now ''de facto'' banned. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 15:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Am I to understand from your comment, that you are personally involved in this editing dispute? -- ] (]) 15:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::I don't know if routine process for challenging spam filter inclusion has been followed yet. If the sites were added by Guy, then, of course, requesting that he reverse this would be an early step. Above, there is implied such a request. It looks like Guy denied it. Okay, next step. --] (]) 15:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Just driving by, but there are many cases where crappy sites are listed in the spam blacklist and in the XlinkxRevertBot lists just for being crappy unreliable sites, even though they are not "spammed" ''per se''. It isn't an abuse of process, it's just a poorly named list.—](]) 16:22, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Many thanks for your attention JzG, are you going to include lenr-canr.org in meta.wikimedia's spam list too? '''] ]''' 18:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::I've now formally requested JzG remove the site, which he added unilaterally, from the blacklist. That doesn't resolve the question and wouldn't be an acceptance by him that the site may be used, but it undoes his usage of administrative tools to support his own views (one must be an admin to edit the spam blacklist). Hopefully, he will do this, and then we can focus on content.... --] (]) 19:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:::I generally would propose additions at ] and let one of the regulars there add it. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:36, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::The linking to lenr-canr.org certainly fits the profile at ]. Is there any admin that would have done anything different?] (]) 21:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::: No, any admin would have done the same. Jed Rothwell was actively spamming his site as part of his ongoing campaign of disruption and POV-pushing, I did exactly what I would do (and have done) in any number of similar cases. Handling linkspam is one of my most consistent long-term activities on Misplaced Pages, and I am also a meta admin for the same reason. In the case of Fleischmann, he has on Google Scholar, it is unlikely to the point of implausibility tat any genuinely vital content would be surceable ''solely'' from a site so heavily spammed by its owner, and so heavily skewed towards advocacy of a fringe POV. On ] articles in particular we should take good care to use only reputable sources; lenr-canr is not one. One of Rothwell's links to it as the "citation" for the DoE review of cold fusion turned out to be a heavily editorialised version. As a source it is untrustworthy, but that is not the reason for the blacklisting, ''that'' is due to Rothwell's long-term spamming and disruption. Abd should note that ''all'' actions, editorial, administrative or otherwise, are ''unilateral'', that is the whole point of having an account - the actions one takes are associated with one's account, end of. The addition was listed for review on the blacklist talk page at the time, but we do not sit around waiting for vandals to vandalise a bit more while we wait for someone to wander by and express an opinion. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 22:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Your point is clear Guy, but I wonder whether you are going to add the site to wikimedia's blacklist. '''] ]''' 22:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=== JzG's multiple roles === |
|
|
From your comment above and your similar comment at ], I can see that you (]) are involved in this issue in at least three different roles: |
|
|
#You are actively involved in a content dispute that is the focus of two resent arbitration cases: You offer your expert opinion on the 2004 DoE cold fusion review, you call your content opponents "Rothwell and his friends" and accuse them of advocating a fringe POV. |
|
|
#As a "spam expert" you offer your opinion on "long-term spamming and disruption" that you claim is happening here. |
|
|
#As a mediawiki administrator one of your "most consistent long-term activities on Misplaced Pages" has been "handling linkspam". |
|
|
I do not think you should act in more than one of these roles at the same time. |
|
|
|
|
|
As to the dispute itself: What I see happening here is an attempt by a group of Wikipedians to enforce a scientific point-of-view on ] and ] subjects. This is against Misplaced Pages's fundamental principle of ]. You call lenr-canr.org, or more precisely the peer-reviewed publications stored there, as "untrustworthy". I undertand this to mean that they are untrustworthy because they present a scientific point of view that differs from mainstream science. On Misplaced Pages POV does not equal unreliability. After all, we have plenty of articles on fiction, even religion! -- ] (]) 00:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== On DickLyon == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello JzG. You have been a little involved in editing the articles related to Blanchard's theory Bailey's book, etc. You likely have read what goes on between myself and DickLyon. Could you help me to resolve my apparently personal dispute with DickLyon? I know we disagree over the merger proposal. This is not about that. This is about the fact that I provide reasons for why I write what I write and he just insults me. I have never insulted him in any way. |
|
|
|
|
|
Now I am no angel. The user Jokestress and I have mixed it up in the past. Last time out she took the fact that I was the guest of a border in the home of Dierdre Mc Closkey (You should have an idea of who that is from reading on the subject if nothing else). She wrote that I broke into her house. I threatened legal action. Yeah I sould not have done that. I believe an admin or bureaucrat totally deleted that text because I have tried to find it. I also mixed it up with the user ] she took it as an insult that I refered to him as a male. But "Alice" said on her talk page] "I am a Transgendered person. More specifically, a male who cross-dresses as a female." The last user I called female by assuming from their name and user page was MariontheLibrarian who is known now as user James cantor. I plead no contest to not being a wiki saint. |
|
|
|
|
|
However Dick's insults feel different. Because he basically has decided he is not going to write anything and will just complain in a way that is at least impolite if not outright insulting. He may be refarining from editing the actual article due to COI. But if that's the case then how can his COI not invalidate his comments on talk pages? That's not what I am going for though. |
|
|
|
|
|
Basically what I want is to avert this mess going to a higher level of conflict resolution. Please help. --] (]) 23:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Happy First Edit Day! == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 1px solid #CC9999; background-color: Yellow;" |
|
|
|align="center"|] |
|
|
|align="left" width="100%"|Happy First Edit Day, <b> {{PAGENAME}}, </b> from the ]! '''Have a great day!''' |
|
|
|
|
|
|} ] (]) 13:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Please remove lenr-canr.org from the spam blacklist == |
|
|
|
|
|
JzG, please remove lenr-canr.org, added by you December 18, 2008, to the local spam blacklist. This is a library of papers and the decision to link to an individual paper, as citations, which you have made impossible by the blacklisting, is one which should be made individually, citation by citation. On the face of it, lenr-canr, as a library of papers, would be a source which we should allow as an external link; however, this is a separate matter. Your use of your administrative tools, in this case, may have been improper, you are clearly involved. |
|
|
|
|
|
It's much simpler if you remove the site than if we go through more complex processes involving other editors. Thanks. --] (]) 19:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
* No. It ios not a reliable source, it is polemical and worthless to Misplaced Pages, and it has been prolifically spammed by its owner. An absolutely open and shut case of ]. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 22:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::The response doesn't seem to match what I see, nor does it address the issues I've raised. Instead of what may be useless argument, you seem very convinced of your position, I gather that you are refusing to remove the listing, and consider your use of administrative tools to be appropriate, even though you may be involved. |
|
|
|
|
|
:This was an attempt to resolve a dispute by direct communication between parties. One more question, though: would you consent to the removal of the listing by another administrator, should one make that decision? I'm looking, Guy, for the simplest and least disruptive means of resolving this. --] (]) 23:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:: No, because the only rationale you have given refers to ''one'' link on ''one'' article (which might or might not justify whitelisting of that ''one'' link); the site has been spammed by its owner, and abused in sundry other ways. We use the blacklist to control link abuse, we use the whitelist to enable carefully selected links from sites whihc have been abused, where consensus is that such links are of significant value. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 09:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::: And '''consensus''' to ''add'' that site to the blacklist was achieved.... exactly when and where? It seems like a unilateral decision on your own part, without discussion. ] (]) 13:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::: I haven't seen a good objection to its presence on the blacklist yet. Are you denying that it's an unreliable site hosted by a fringe-theory advocate? Or are you saying that using unreliable sites hosted by fringe-theory advocates as references is a good thing?—](]) 14:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::One should, I suppose, apply ideological litmus tests to the webmasters of any site before allowing it to be linked? But my objection here is less to the specifics of that site or its owner than to the concept that adding things to the blacklist can be done unilaterally without discussion by one admin, while removing them or making exceptions to them requires consensus. That's a tilted playing field, and opens up the possibility of systemic bias. ] (]) 14:33, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Take it to RSN. If you can get people to agree it's a reliable source, JzG won't have a leg to stand on. Adding things to the spam blocklist is one of those powers that a Mediawiki admin has, and he used it. Overturning an admin action '''always''' requires a consensus that the action was improper. This isn't particularly different. It is also a case where his action was so clearly correct that you don't really stand a chance of getting it overturned, but that isn't a fault in the process, that's because of the nature of the site and the disruptive behaviour of the site owner.—](]) 14:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::: If it was the New York Times and it was spammed by the webmaster we would still likely blacklist it. I don't think we really need any more forum shopping on this, we're only one step away from Dan resurrecting his BADSITES crusade as it is. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 17:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
(unindent) Forum shopping? JzG, I've been trying to resolve this with the minimum possible fuss. I came to you first, once I realized the problem. You have been, I'd say, intransigent. Where would you suggest I go next, if I'm not satisfied? Is it forum shopping if I come to you, then to the specific place where the error I allege involves? Where would the next step in ] take us? You are the experienced admin, I the relative newbie. In the absence of better advice, I'd say, an administrative noticeboard might be next. The issue I have raised isn't exactly whether or not lenr-canr.org should be blacklisted, it is whether or not you, with what is obviously a very strong POV regarding it, should have been the one to, on your own, blacklist it, which involves a use of your tools. There is ''also'' an issue about lenr-canr, was it "spammed" or wasn't it, but that is actually a ''separate'' issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
I will, however, respond on one point. lenr-canr.org cannot be used as a source itself, probably. It isn't a peer-reviewed publication, it isn't a reliable source, and that has nothing to do with it being fringe. It's a private web site that archives material on a topic; you allege that this archive is biased, perhaps it is, or perhaps it isn't. (It's an archive of documents relating to cold fusion, which is a serious research topic and which remains so; however, it will, by its nature, contain many controversial documents.) However, much of the material archived ''is'' material that was independently published, material that is RS, due to its original publication or nature. It's the original publications that are RS. For anyone who wants to reference, here, one of these articles, it is conveniently available at lenr-canr.org, which facilitates reader verification. It ''may or may not'' be available elsewhere, often not, in my experience. The source in the article where I know the context was actually a paper by Fleischmann, ''not'' lenr-canr.org, which merely hosts a copy of the paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
JzG, you are making content decisions, unilaterally, and enforcing them by the use of your tools. That's contrary to policy. Please fix it, please make this objection moot. I look here to see if you have responded, but otherwise I'm done here.--] (]) 05:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==AfD nomination of Blanchard, Bailey, and Lawrence theory controversy== |
|
|
]An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 17:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this deletion nomination. I recommend avoiding engaging WhatamIdoing in debate as much as possible, as it will usually devolve into what a bad person I am within a few posts. That editor gets extremely worked up about this topic and can barely control herself, seeking to extort some sort of apology or otherwise punish me for some off-wiki trolling six years ago (which apparently worked better than I could have ever imagined at the time). While she's always good for a smile, she can be a bit of a time sink. Same with Hfarmer. Happy 2009! ] (]) 00:33, 8 January 2009 (UTC) |
|
.jpg)
