| Revision as of 05:09, 19 January 2009 editKleenupKrew (talk | contribs)1,323 edits →Rule the Rail!: delete← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 08:13, 4 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''. –] ] ] 01:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} | |||
| :{{la|Rule the Rail!}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Rule the Rail!}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 17: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Cool, but not notable. ] (]) 08:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - Cool, but not notable. ] (]) 08:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Apparent advertising. If the company that released it is still at redlink at this point, the game probably isn't notable either. ] (]) 05:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Apparent advertising. If the company that released it is still at redlink at this point, the game probably isn't notable either. ] (]) 05:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 08:13, 4 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton 01:19, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Rule the Rail!
- Rule the Rail! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Unreferenced, insufficient notability —Snigbrook 22:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notability at all. Suspected spam.--Darius (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Rail transportation is currently making a comeback in the US.Critical Chris (talk) 00:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment — Bull****!!!! We Americans are proud of our huge mechanical beasts in which we populate to the brim our highways and biways and turnpikes with! We especially cherish the best invention God has given us — the sport utility vehicle and its 14 MPG goodness! Why, other countries are just jealous that we drive six blocks as compared to the out-of-date bussing or biking to and from work every day! God bless the automobile! Note: that was all humongous sarcasm and intended as sarcastic humor. Besides, with 12 inches of snow down, 3 inches of ice, and temps of -20° F (-45° F wind chill), no car or bus is going anywhere BWA HA HA HA!!!!! MuZemike 01:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete — I could not find any reliable secondary sources establishing notability, as shown by a Google search I have done here or by a Yahoo! search here. MuZemike 01:32, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - Cool, but not notable. SharkD (talk) 08:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Apparent advertising. If the company that released it is still at redlink at this point, the game probably isn't notable either. KleenupKrew (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.