Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/OSHO Dynamic Meditation: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:48, 19 January 2009 editJayen466 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,622 edits OSHO Dynamic Meditation: trademark no longer valid according to press← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:46, 4 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''redirect to ]'''. (]) ] (]) 00:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}


:{{la|OSHO Dynamic Meditation}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|OSHO Dynamic Meditation}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Line 9: Line 15:
There are on google scholar, and 0 results on . There are on google scholar, and 0 results on .


The page currently contains one inline citation. ]<font color="green">]</font>] 05:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC) The page currently contains one inline citation. ]]] 05:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ]<font color="green">]</font>] 05:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)</small> *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ]]] 05:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ]<font color="green">]</font>] 05:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)</small> *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ]]] 05:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)</small>

* <s>'''Keep'''</s> '''Redirect''' Our article on it is very poor, but there are nearly a couple of hundred matches in google books: Even discounting the primary sources, there's still a few dozen solid scholarly sources left. A few dozen matches in google scholar: Google generally: . ]] 05:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
**As for the trademark, they seem to have lost it, according to this press report just a couple of days ago: ]] 05:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' to ] (aka, Bhagwan Sree Rajneesh). Nothing about this product/brand name for meditation establishes any notability apart from the Rajneesh movement, so any mention of it belongs there and not in a separate article. ] (]) 06:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
**Given the present state of the article, I don't think I would quibble with a redirect decision. However, Süss (1996, ISBN 3532640104, p. 123), a Christian scholar, asserts the technique is done in various generic workshops, as well as some schools and universities; in a book on Counselling published by (an academic publisher); it pops up in a book on ; a book on again by Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, and going from the sublime to the ridiculous, it's also got a mention in (Penguin Books). The work presently cited in the article actually devotes five pages to a description of it. I'm only saying, if someone were to find himself at a loose end on a rainy afternoon, it would be possible to write a well-sourced article about it ... Cheers, ]] 07:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

*Heh. I'm from Oregon and remember hearing about this cult. My cousin actually joined it. Anyway, '''redirect''' to ]. As KleenupKrew said, there's nothing about this article that establishes notability outside the Rajneesh. ]<sub>]</sub> 06:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''' for now. there could be a valid detailed article--there's no shortage of sources. But at the moment, all the content is included in the main article. ''']''' (]) 00:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
* '''Keep''' Our article on it is very poor, but there are nearly a couple of hundred matches in google books: Even discounting the primary sources, there's still a few dozen solid scholarly sources left. A few dozen matches in google scholar: Google generally: . <font color="#0000FF">]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>'' 05:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
**As for the trademark, they seem to have lost it, according to this press report just a couple of days ago: <font color="#0000FF">]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>'' 05:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:46, 4 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Osho. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

OSHO Dynamic Meditation

OSHO Dynamic Meditation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Osho Dynamic Meditation, a claimed trademark of Osho Foundation International is a non-notable product name used for a meditation technique.

The exact name is used in 7 published books under the authorship of Osho himself. Google books returns another 7 books by independent authors (although one of them is listed as a contact on an Osho meditation center).

There are 2 results on google scholar, and 0 results on google news.

The page currently contains one inline citation. Spidern 05:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Heh. I'm from Oregon and remember hearing about this cult. My cousin actually joined it. Anyway, redirect to Osho. As KleenupKrew said, there's nothing about this article that establishes notability outside the Rajneesh. Graymornings(talk) 06:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Redirect for now. there could be a valid detailed article--there's no shortage of sources. But at the moment, all the content is included in the main article. DGG (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.