Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Teh Chou Tzou: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:29, 21 January 2009 editDavid.Mestel (talk | contribs)Rollbackers5,396 edits →Teh Chou Tzou: delete← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:47, 19 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ]|] 10:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


:{{la|Teh Chou Tzou}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Teh Chou Tzou}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
The subject does not appear to meet the ]. One of the references does not appear to mention the subject, while the other two link to ]. A and search for his name finds nothing. The ] page lists him as a notable alumni ("a professional body builder") but I was unable to find any sources that ] this. ]&nbsp;<sup><b>(])</b></sup> 22:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC) The subject does not appear to meet the ]. One of the references does not appear to mention the subject, while the other two link to ]. A and search for his name finds nothing. The ] page lists him as a notable alumni ("a professional body builder") but I was unable to find any sources that ] this. ]&nbsp;<sup><b>(])</b></sup> 22:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': Entirely unsourced ]. First source doesn't seem to mention him, and Facebook profile != source. Ever. ]<sup>(])</sup> 23:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''': Entirely unsourced ]. First source doesn't seem to mention him, and Facebook profile != source. Ever. ]<sup>(])</sup> 23:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 00:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 00:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)</small>
<hr style="width:50%;"/>
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 23:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*'''Strong delete''' - The assertion that he qualified for the finals of a competitions '''is not backed up by the source''' to which it is ref'd; in fact the source doesn't mention this guy at all. ever, and an ordinary google search provides no hits for the name whatsoever. The other references are to facebook of all places, and the guy in the profile photo doesn't look too much like a pro bodybuilder from what I can see. This looks like a ] to me, and if not that, then at the very least he doesn't seem to meet our ] (or ]) guidelines. This needs to go. – <span style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC; font-size:15px;">''']]'''</span> 00:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
*'''Utmost Delete''' Not only does it read like an advert, there again are no sources to back up the claims made.--] (]) 02:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 15:47, 19 May 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mgm| 10:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Teh Chou Tzou

Teh Chou Tzou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The subject does not appear to meet the notability criteria for athletes. One of the references does not appear to mention the subject, while the other two link to Facebook. A Google and Google News search for his name finds nothing. The Seoul International School page lists him as a notable alumni ("a professional body builder") but I was unable to find any sources that verify this. Arbitrarily0  22:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong delete - The assertion that he qualified for the finals of a competitions is not backed up by the source to which it is ref'd; in fact the source doesn't mention this guy at all. Zero Google news hits ever, and an ordinary google search provides no hits for the name whatsoever. The other references are to facebook of all places, and the guy in the profile photo doesn't look too much like a pro bodybuilder from what I can see. This looks like a hoax to me, and if not that, then at the very least he doesn't seem to meet our verifiability (or notability) guidelines. This needs to go. – Toon 00:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Utmost Delete Not only does it read like an advert, there again are no sources to back up the claims made.--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 02:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.