| Revision as of 00:52, 22 January 2009 editKristen Eriksen (talk | contribs)3,612 edits JS: Closing AFD discussion as keep← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:53, 19 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | ||
| The result was '''keep'''. ] |
The result was '''keep'''. ] ] 00:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :'''Keep''' - Thanks to ] for digging up sources. -- ] (]) 11:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | :'''Keep''' - Thanks to ] for digging up sources. -- ] (]) 11:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''': no reliable independent 3rd party sources. ] (]) 01:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''': no reliable independent 3rd party sources. ] (]) 01:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] | ] 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Keep''' an actual, released film with plenty of ghits including several martial arts magazines (many of which are available in print at bookstores) , , , . ] (]) 03:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' an actual, released film with plenty of ghits including several martial arts magazines (many of which are available in print at bookstores) , , , . ] (]) 03:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Extreme keep''' as I have rescued the article since it was nominated, and it now shows proper notability. The sources provided are from those in the field qualified to make their statements. You won't read about this film in the ], just as you won't read about ] in the Mixed Martial Arts Weekly. Reliability of sources must be considered in context to what is being sourced. Its now a keeper. ''']''' '']'' 04:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Extreme keep''' as I have rescued the article since it was nominated, and it now shows proper notability. The sources provided are from those in the field qualified to make their statements. You won't read about this film in the ], just as you won't read about ] in the Mixed Martial Arts Weekly. Reliability of sources must be considered in context to what is being sourced. Its now a keeper. ''']''' '']'' 04:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:53, 19 May 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Nordic Goddess Kristen 00:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Renzo Gracie Legacy
- Renzo Gracie Legacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not meet WP:FILM - only claim to notability is that the subject of the documentary is notable. Admittedly self-distributed and released with "little or no marketing" on a web site. No third-party sources. Graymornings(talk) 21:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete- no sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 23:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep - Thanks to User:MichaelQSchmidt for digging up sources. -- Whpq (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete: no reliable independent 3rd party sources. JamesBurns (talk) 01:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep an actual, released film with plenty of ghits including several martial arts magazines (many of which are available in print at bookstores) , , , . JJL (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Extreme keep as I have rescued the article since it was nominated, and it now shows proper notability. The sources provided are from those in the field qualified to make their statements. You won't read about this film in the Washington Post, just as you won't read about Barrack Obama in the Mixed Martial Arts Weekly. Reliability of sources must be considered in context to what is being sourced. Its now a keeper. Schmidt, 04:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.