Revision as of 00:04, 27 January 2009 editKristen Eriksen (talk | contribs)3,612 edits JS: Closing AFD discussion as keep← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:40, 5 May 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | ||
The result was '''keep'''. ] |
The result was '''keep'''. ] ] 00:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Delete''' spamvertising. ] (]) 07:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' spamvertising. ] (]) 07:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] (]) 11:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>-- ] (]) 11:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Keep''' after cleanup. Doesn't fall foul of ] because it's been described as "the world's leading skateboard company" by a leading daily newspaper, as clearly cited and linked in the article. Some phrases do fall foul of ] and ] as it stands, but I think that could be solved by a little editing. I'll start that now.--] ]/] 13:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' after cleanup. Doesn't fall foul of ] because it's been described as "the world's leading skateboard company" by a leading daily newspaper, as clearly cited and linked in the article. Some phrases do fall foul of ] and ] as it stands, but I think that could be solved by a little editing. I'll start that now.--] ]/] 13:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep'''. Significant enough company with sufficient coverage.--] (]) 18:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Significant enough company with sufficient coverage.--] (]) 18:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' The article is far from spam. It is referenced by a number of reliable sources, which I added earlier this month, that shows it notability. ] (]) 21:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' The article is far from spam. It is referenced by a number of reliable sources, which I added earlier this month, that shows it notability. ] (]) 21:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' Notable. ] (]) 23:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Notable. ] (]) 23:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 19:40, 5 May 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Nordic Goddess Kristen 00:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Element Skateboards
- Element Skateboards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
clearly an ad, runs afoul of at the very least WP:ADVERT and WP:N Aurush kazemini 06:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete spamvertising. JBsupreme (talk) 07:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep after cleanup. Doesn't fall foul of WP:N because it's been described as "the world's leading skateboard company" by a leading daily newspaper, as clearly cited and linked in the article. Some phrases do fall foul of WP:NPOV and WP:ADVERT as it stands, but I think that could be solved by a little editing. I'll start that now.--S Marshall /Cont 13:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Significant enough company with sufficient coverage.--Michig (talk) 18:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep The article is far from spam. It is referenced by a number of reliable sources, which I added earlier this month, that shows it notability. Cunard (talk) 21:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.