Talk:Architecture of Russia: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:57, 2 November 2005 editIrpen (talk \| contribs)32,604 edits →Vote?← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 04:17, 20 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,291,484 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. The article is listed in the level 5 page: By geographic location.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(572 intermediate revisions by 64 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=B\|vital=yes\|1=
	aon the article tab
			{{WikiProject Architecture\|importance=Top}}
			{{WikiProject Russia\| importance = Top\| art = yes\| hist = yes\| tech = yes}}
			{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors}}
			}}
			{{Archive box\|auto=yes}}
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
			\|maxarchivesize = 100K
			\|counter = 2
			\|minthreadsleft = 5
			\|minthreadstoarchive = 1
			\|algo = old(90d)
			\|archive = Talk:Architecture of Russia/Archive %(counter)d
			}}

			==File:224th Flight Unit Antonov An-124 over Moscow 6 May 2010.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
	: This article is not suitable as an encyclopaedia article, as it is in violation of Misplaced Pages's ] (NPOV) policy, and is written in a very non-encyclopaedic tone. In addition if it's from a website, it might be a ]. Please do something to address these problems, or the article might be deleted as per Misplaced Pages's ]. - ] ] 18:46, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
			{\|
			\|-
			\| ]
			\| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for deletion at ] in the following category: ''Deletion requests September 2011''
			;What should I do?
			''Don't panic''; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
			* If the image is ] then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
			* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no ] then it cannot be uploaded or used.

			''This notification is provided by a Bot'' --] (]) 15:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
	==Article completely rewritten==
			\|}
			==File:Moscow, Bagration Bridge and Tower 2000.jpg Nominated for Deletion==
			{\|
			\|-
			\| ]
			\| An image used in this article, ], has been nominated for deletion at ] in the following category: ''Deletion requests May 2012''
			;What should I do?
			''Don't panic''; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
			* If the image is ] then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
			* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no ] then it cannot be uploaded or used.
			To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant ]

			''This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image'' --] (]) 13:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
	This article was completely rewritten after the article that the above comments refer to was speedy deleted after being listed for deletion. ] 12:26, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
			\|}
	:Nice work on the article. ] <sup><small><b>]</b></sup></small> 16:30, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==
	== Moving articles by cut and paste ==

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,
	], you are showing a bad example to the novice Misplaced Pages editors, particularly ]. Now he should be completely lost about the wikipedia rules and may actually never grow to respect other people's works.

			I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review ]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
	Now the discussion page is linked between ] and ], but the articles themselves and their histories are separated. ] 10:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050818065003/http://www.bartleby.com/65/ru/RussianA.html to http://www.bartleby.com/65/ru/Russiana.html
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091021030808/http://www.skypalace.org/europe/slavic/east_slavic/russia.shtml to http://www.skypalace.org/europe/slavic/east_slavic/russia.shtml

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
	], in the event you would almost single-handily wrote an article of a similar quality and some alternatively talented user would suddenly move it to a strange location, I promise not to scold you for using cut-n-paste to return the article where it belongs. ] 12:44, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}
	== POV? ==

			Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 04:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
	] posted a POV sticker on the top of the article, but forgot to explain his grievances on the talk page. Unless he would explain them shortly, I intend to remove the sticker. ] 12:25, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
	: POV is in unifiyng Kievan Rus with Muscovy and Russia architecture. ] 12:33, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
	:: So it makes ''totally disputed'' all the sections of the article including the Soviet architecture and the architecture of Russian Empire?
	:: Anyway the Ukraine and Russia share the common history and it is impossible to separate one of the other for some periods. Including the whole history of the Kievan Rus into the Russian history, without separating it onto the History of the Russian Rus and the Ukrainian Rus is a norm for all English-language text books I am aware of. Of course it does not prevent any History of Ukraine to include any references to the history of Rus including the history of Russian Rus. ] 12:57, 29
	October 2005 (UTC)

			== A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion ==
	: It's better to make separate Architecture of Rus article ] 13:28, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
			The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
	::Well, write it then. I personally has nothing against a good article on the architecture of the Kievan Rus, then both Russian Architecture and Ukrainian Architecture could just refer to the new article and have a few milestones mentioned. I would still wait for the opinion of Ghirladajo, as he is the main author and his opinion matter most ] 13:50, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
			* ]<!-- COMMONSBOT: speedy \| 2020-06-20T08:55:03.974433 \| RIAN archive 850726 XXV Congress of the CPSU.jpg -->
			You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —] (]) 08:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

			==Wiki Education assignment: Imperial Russian History==
	Guys, the only part that is disputed here is the title and whether one signle section belongs to the article, not even the neutrality of the section. There are special templates for that. ], if still unconvinsed, may add these templates to an appropriate section but there is no justification to put a disputed tag over the entire article. I repeat that the matter is not that I view his objctions as without merit but that they are obviously narrower than the general disputed tag. Also, please check the recent entries at ] for a very similar dispute. --] 14:56, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
			{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment \| course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Miami/Imperial_Russian_History_(Fall_2022) \| assignments = ] \| reviewers = ], ] \| start_date = 2022-08-23 \| end_date = 2022-12-06 }}

			<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 16:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)</span>
	:The POV to be discussed is clearly seen in the first sentence, which mentiones architecture of Kievan Rus, which is not quite well correspondes to the title.--] 20:43, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

	For that, you can use the templates that question neutrality of the title and/or the particular section. But you can leave the global POV for now. Wait for kind of responses you will get. --] 21:14, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

	:I can imagine... ;) --] 21:19, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

	Still, as a suggestion, please consider the following: ], ] and ] which are more sort of narrow. or maybe none. As an alternative, write an article about ], include there the architecture of Rus' and I promise you, no one will bark. Also, your efforts to write an article about Ch. principality are highly appreciated. You can be sure it will be listed up for a move vote, but in any case your writing is helping WP. I hope this won't be the last article you write. Feel free to retract the load of shit you unloaded at Maidan but feel free not to as well. Your language speaks about yourself as much as about the others. --] 21:33, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

	==Vote?==
	Since there is little chance to convince ] in anything, I suggest we put the appropriateness of the title up for voting. If we see a consensus emerging that the title is adequate, we will dump his tag. If not, we will discuss what the better name would be. In the meanwhile, I suggest AndriyK offers his suggestions on how to name the article. I bet his was joking with "Rus'" in the name of the article that included Soviet Realism architecture. I doubt he will take up my proposal to write a ] article and have the issue settled this way. He can still contribute to ] written by his perceived enemies of Ukraine. But maybe he has other good ideas. Objections? --] 20:46, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

	:Woud not you start voting about the value of π? Indeed, π=3 or π=4 is much more convenient that this crazy irrational number π=3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751...
	:This is not a matter of somebody's taste. This is a matter of fact. Kievan Rus is not Russia. And Russia is not Kievan Rus.--] 08:56, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

	We already heard you, AndriyK. Reread above and answer the question, if you can. You are asked to offer a name. Reread... Also, while Ghirlandajo didn't authorize me to speak on his behalf, I can asure you that if you will write a ] article and would start it from Kievan Rus' chapter and would just paste his text there, he would not object at all from what I can tell --] 23:38, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

	Would it not be sufficient to put one brief sentence in that section explaining the meaning of Rus’? If it can mention in passing Ukrainian and Belarusan heritage without distracting from the subject, that should satisfy any reasonable East Slav. ''—] ] <small>2005-11-2 02:26 Z</small>''

	:I don't know what would be sufficient for the user you have in mind but IMO such mention would definetely not hurt. OTOH, the claim that the even while this isn't added yet the article needs a global POV label is just ridiculous. Unfortunately, I am not too good in architecture. But those who are, would you please indeed add a word or two as per above? Thanks! --] 04:57, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

	== Good article ==

	In case it hasn't been clearly stated, very good work, G. ''—] ] <small>2005-11-2 02:00 Z</small>''

Latest revision as of 04:17, 20 October 2024

This

level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Top‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Russia: Technology & engineering / Visual arts / History Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Misplaced Pages. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Archives

1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

File:224th Flight Unit Antonov An-124 over Moscow 6 May 2010.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:224th Flight Unit Antonov An-124 over Moscow 6 May 2010.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Moscow, Bagration Bridge and Tower 2000.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Moscow, Bagration Bridge and Tower 2000.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests May 2012

What should I do?

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Misplaced Pages (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Moscow, Bagration Bridge and Tower 2000.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Russian architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

RIAN archive 850726 XXV Congress of the CPSU.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:55, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Imperial Russian History

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 6 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ToriTrouble (article contribs). Peer reviewers: CIN513, Norgusbjorgus.

— Assignment last updated by Soviethistorian (talk) 16:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Categories: