| Revision as of 16:29, 18 February 2009 editDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 edits →NPA: clarify WP:NPA and WP:CIV comment policies← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:11, 7 February 2022 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,342 editsm Signing comment by SpiralSource - "requested reassessment for article "holographic will"" | ||
| (416 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{SA-novice}} | |||
| ==Welcome to Misplaced Pages== | |||
| {{#ifeq: {{lc:{{BASEPAGENAME}}}} | {{uc:{{BASEPAGENAME}}}} | |||
| | '''Welcome''' | |||
| Hello, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:|, such as the one you made in ]|}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see: | |||
| ==Indef block== | |||
| * ] | |||
| You have been blocked indefinitely per the consensus forming here Best. ] (] · ] · ]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| == Talk page access blocked == | |||
| You are welcome to continue editing articles without ], but you may wish to '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several ]. If you edit without a username, your ] ({{BASEPAGENAME}}) is used to identify you instead. | |||
| Due to block evasion at {{IP|75.7.198.193}} and continuing a pattern of personal attacks. Please use ] if you want to appeal your block. ] / ] / ] / ] 03:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:{{#if:|{{{1}}}}}|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> before the question on this page. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:welcome-anon --> | |||
| | '''Welcome!''' | |||
| There are actually two routes for appealing your block. Personal attacks and block evasions won't get you very far. Your first place would be the ]. Should they decline your request, you can use BASC as per Dennis Brown's comments above. Regards, ] (] - ]) 16:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:|, especially what you did for ]|}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:{{#if:|{{{1}}}}}|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> | |||
| }}—]] 21:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Clarification motion == | ||
| A case (]) in which you were involved has been modified by {{oldid2|631252824|Motion|motion}} which changed the wording of the ] to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --]] 20:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Fladrif, please be careful about accusations of vandalism. See ]. ] (]) 15:59, 27 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Warnborough ie logo.gif== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked== | |||
| You have been blocked per ] on the ] page. ] <small>]</small> 16:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Article assessment: "Holographic Will" == | |||
| ::You can't be serious.] (]) 17:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, I hope you are well. I would like you to please consider re-assessing this article: ]. It is currently listed as start class, although, in my opinion, it is very well put together. I am not involved in the Law community here, so I would like your perspective on this. As far as I can surmise, it's a thoroughly detailed article, breaking down the law for a significant number of countries, with more than adequate sourcing, and provides an excellent lead. To my lay impression, this strikes me as a B class article, but at the very least, it's definitely more than a start at this point. Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| {{tlx|unblock|I'm sorry and it will never happen again I thought simply asked the question about who ] was, given the user's self-identification as a representative of the school. But, I see that could be interpreted as crossing the line. Sorry. It won't happen again. I think that I have otherwise been a highly responsible contributor who's added a lot of valuable content and documentation on a variety of topics. }} ] (]) 17:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :This is being discussed with the blocking admin. Standby. - ] ] 18:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | ] | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): | |||
| <br><br>Per discussion with the blocking admin and your assurances that you will not speculate or comment on the likely identities of other Misplaced Pages editors. Doing so will result in an immediate indef block. | |||
| ''Request handled by:'' - ] ] 19:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> | |||
| |} | |||
| :::Thank you so much. ] (]) 19:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Warnborough == | |||
| I just wanted to thank you again for the recent rewriting and reorganization. It really improved it. I feel pleased every time I look at it. I actually feel like the article is close to being done. There are about 4 small things that I may eventually suggest be changed, but overall it really seems to be shaping up. ] (]) 18:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Thank you for the kind words, and for your own input and perspective on the article. ] (]) 19:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Malnak == | |||
| Thanks for correcting Adams. I mostly agree with you, but the context in which he mentions it would necessitate looking at the other decision to see why he's contrasting it in order to understand his point there. And thanks for correcting my point about the footnote. Don't know how I made the mistake. I think you're pretty weak on characterizing a point as "uncontested" that the document itself contradicts. And it was wrong to delete the attribution to Markovsky. I think we've both reached the ] limit. If you revert again you could be blocked. Gotta run. ] (]) 22:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==NPA== | |||
| It is a blatant ] on another editor. You will restrict your comments to the editorial content of the article and make no further comments about other contributors per ] and ] or you '''will''' be ] ] <small>]</small> 16:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:11, 7 February 2022
Indef block
You have been blocked indefinitely per the consensus forming here Best. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 14:24, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk page access blocked
Due to block evasion at 75.7.198.193 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and continuing a pattern of personal attacks. Please use WP:BASC if you want to appeal your block. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 03:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
There are actually two routes for appealing your block. Personal attacks and block evasions won't get you very far. Your first place would be the unblock ticket request system. Should they decline your request, you can use BASC as per Dennis Brown's comments above. Regards, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Clarification motion
A case (Transcendental Meditation movement) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 20:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Warnborough ie logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Warnborough ie logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Article assessment: "Holographic Will"
Hello, I hope you are well. I would like you to please consider re-assessing this article: . It is currently listed as start class, although, in my opinion, it is very well put together. I am not involved in the Law community here, so I would like your perspective on this. As far as I can surmise, it's a thoroughly detailed article, breaking down the law for a significant number of countries, with more than adequate sourcing, and provides an excellent lead. To my lay impression, this strikes me as a B class article, but at the very least, it's definitely more than a start at this point. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpiralSource (talk • contribs) 09:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)