Revision as of 21:57, 22 February 2009 editRadagast83 (talk | contribs)18,709 edits No clear consensus for merger← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 13:41, 13 December 2024 edit undoPolly Tunnel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,296 editsm markup fix |
(374 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
<!-- Make this a disambiguation page for meanings of "embargo" --> |
|
|
{{Otheruses4|the economic term|press embargoes|Embargo (journalism)}} |
|
|
{{For|delayed access after publication|Embargo (academic publishing)}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
In international ] and ], an '''embargo''' is the prohibition of commerce (division of trade) and trade with a certain country, in order to isolate it and to put its government into a difficult internal situation, given that the effects of the embargo are often able to make its economy suffer from the initiative. |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
|
{{R from subtopic}} |
|
|
{{R printworthy}} |
|
|
{{R with possibilities}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Authority control}} |
|
The embargo is usually used as a political punishment for some previous disagreed policies or acts, but its economic nature frequently raises doubts about the real interests that the prohibition serves. |
|
|
|
|
|
One of the most comprehensive attempts at an embargo happened during the ]. In an attempt to cripple the ] economically, the ]- which forbade ] from trading with the ]- was created. In practice it was not completely enforceable and was as harmful if not more so to the nations involved than to the British. |
|
|
|
|
|
The United States had imposed an embargo on Cuban Castro government on February 7,1962.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/United_States_embargo_against_Cuba</ref>Although the ] of the ] does not prohibit participation in an embargo it does prohibit participation in a secondary embargo. This occurs when one country pressures a business to stop doing business with a third country over issues with which the business is not directly involved. Not only is an American business required not to participate in a secondary embargo, but is also required to report all attempts to get a business to participate in a secondary embargo. The situation which led to these laws are attempts by ] to prevent American companies from doing business with ] and ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
While traditionally considered an act of ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.crimesofwar.org/thebook/blockade-act-war.html |title=Blockade as Act of War |accessdate=2008-10-13 |publisher=Crimes of War Project}}</ref>, in modern practise this is not necessarily so and an act of embargo is much more complex. The typical reaction is the development of an ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Notes== |
|
|
{{reflist|2}} |
|
|
|
|
|
==See also== |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] Embargo ], ] ] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|
|
] |
|