| Revision as of 11:10, 27 February 2009 editFram (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors247,060 edits →Poisoning the well: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:16, 25 December 2023 edit undoZinnober9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,978 editsm Fixed Lint errors on this page (table tag errors) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
{{User:Ikip/L}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== FNORD == |
|
<div class="plainlinks" style="font-size: 120%; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; border: 1px solid #6688AA; background: #E9ECFF; text-align: center"> |
|
|
''''''</div> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="border-spacing:2px; margin:0px" width="100%" |
|
{{User talk:Ikip/r}} |
|
|
{|align=right width=300px |
|
|
|] |
|
| ⚫ |
|- |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
{| class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FCF2D9; background-color:#FFF; color:#FFF;font-size: 90%" |
|
{{WP:ARS/Tagged}} |
|
|
⚫ |
| |
|
|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="background-color:#E2E7FF" |
|
|
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#F4F7FA; border:1px solid red; text-align:left; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.4em; padding-bottom: 0.4em; padding-right: 0.4em;">] Hello, Ikip.<br>You have been invited to ] the ], a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. <br>For more information, please visit the ], where you can ] and help improve Misplaced Pages articles considered by others as based upon notable topics. {{{1|] (]) 11:32, 26 July 2012 (UTC)}}} |
|
|
{{-}}</div> |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
|
|} |
|
__TOC__ |
|
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
<!--Template:Article Rescue Squadron invite--> |
|
== User:C3: Colorectal Cancer Coalition == |
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of hassling me, why don't you go take a look at what happened to ]. OK they created a promotional article and I tagged it for deletion but they also said they were willing to adjust the article. I thought perhaps I could help because there do seem to be some reliable sources about it, but when I get back I find that they've been indefinitely blocked for "spam", which seems pretty fricken' brutal if you ask me. ] (]) 21:05, 26 February 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Covert US Regime Change Action == |
|
|
|
|
|
You changed the title of this article without consulting anyone. The title before your changed it covered all such actions by the US, and did not focus on the CIA. Since there are secret operations, sometimes it's difficult to point to any particular US agency. Also, the article should not focus on the CIA as an institution but on the actual operations and their effects on the ground. |
|
|
|
|
|
Please revert. In future, please propose all such major changes on the article talk page before making change. Thanks.--] (]) 00:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Poisoning the well == |
|
|
|
|
|
This refers to an old comment you made, but which I just now saw? Could you please refrain from commenting on people's supposed motives and stick to the value of their actual comments? You are suggesting that people's opinions can be dismissed becaues they have initiated a lot of AfD's, and/or haven't created enough articles (an argument you wisely did not use in my case, since I created a lot more articles than you did, and none are "articles" which should never have been created in the first place and are now cross-namespace redirects like ] and ].) |
|
|
|
|
|
You claim in that diff that "a policy which encourages editors to work together before deleting would hinder what editors who delete other editors hard work are trying to doing here": thanks for the blatant mischaracterization. I have worked together with many, many editors, and have achieved great results in doing so. I have also tried to upheld Misplaced Pages's policies in all cases, both when I deleted articles or nominated them for deletion, but also when I denied speedies, restored pages, or suggested to keep articles in AfD debates. Many of the AfD's I started were not "other editor's hard work" but blatant hoaxes, copyright violations, and so on. Other's were about someone's hard work, which was just not suited for WIkipedia. We are not a free webhost, even though we have nearly unlimited space: we are an encyclopedia, and not everything is suited for inclusion. To decide what is and isn't suited, we have discussions, and I abide by the consensus if it follows our core policies (I have , if I recall correctly, ''never'' started a DRV when an AfD by me did not end in a delete, and I have also tried to incorporate the decision from one AfD in my next nominations). |
|
|
|
|
|
I really hope that you will start discussing things in a more friendly and less personalized manner. ] (]) 11:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
|
