Misplaced Pages

Mazda RX-792P: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:34, 1 March 2009 editMulsannescorner (talk | contribs)114 edits Added appropriate reference.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:01, 1 December 2023 edit undoKku (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users115,375 editsm kku bot link power-to-weight ratio 
(42 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{More citations needed|date=February 2018}}{{Infobox automobile
⚫ The '''Mazda RX-792P''' was a ] built for the ]'s GTP category for ]. Its career was short lived, with only two cars running in ] before the project was abandoned.
| image = 1992 Mazda RX-792P (20243767080).jpg
| name = Mazda RX-792P
| manufacturer = ] (])
| designer = Lee Dykstra<br>Randy Wittine
| production = 1992
| class = ] ]
| engine = {{cvt|2.6|L|cuin|0|abbr=on}} ]
| transmission = March 5-speed ]
| powerout = {{cvt|690|hp|PS kW|0|abbr=on}} at 9,000 rpm<br>{{cvt|608|Nm|lbft|0|abbr=on}} at 4,500 rpm <ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.supercars.net/blog/1992-mazda-rx-792p/|title= RX-792P, specifications|author= Nick D|date= April 2016|publisher= supercars.net|accessdate= 2017-12-20}}</ref>
| layout = ]
| weight = {{cvt|830|kg|lb|1|abbr=on}} <ref name= "Mazda RX-792P Specifications">{{cite web|url=http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/spec/4249/Mazda-RX-792P.html|title= Mazda RX-792P Specifications|date= 2015-01-25|author= Wouter Melissen|publisher= ultimatecarpage.com|accessdate=2017-12-20}}</ref>
| wheelbase = {{cvt|2667|mm|in|1|abbr=on}} <ref name= "Mazda RX-792P Specifications"/>
| length = {{cvt|4800|mm|in|1|abbr=on}} <ref name= "Mazda RX-792P Specifications"/>
| width = {{cvt|1981|mm|in|1|abbr=on}} <ref name= "Mazda RX-792P Specifications"/>
| height = {{cvt|1016|mm|in|1|abbr=on}} <ref name= "Mazda RX-792P Specifications"/>
| body_style = 2-door ]
| predecessor =
| related = ]
}}


⚫ The '''Mazda RX-792P''' is a ] ] built for the ]'s ] category for ]. Its career was short lived, with only two cars running in 1992 before the project was abandoned.
⚫ The car's name would be a combination of Mazda's ] road car, the year the car raced, and the fact that it was a prototype.

⚫ The car's name is a combination of Mazda's ] road car, the year the car raced (19'''92''') and the fact that it was a '''P'''rototype.


==Development== ==Development==
Following many successful years running the ] in IMSA's GTO class and ] in the GTU class, Mazda chose to take on a new challenge. Although Mazda has supported the use of their ] engines in GTP prototypes in the past, Mazda wished to compete with the likes of ], ], ], and ] with a full factory effort. This would coincide with Mazda's continued running of the ] in Europe, as well as the ] at home. Following many successful years running the ] in IMSA's GTO class and ] in the GTU class, Mazda chose to take on a new challenge. Although Mazda had supported the use of their ] engines in GTP prototypes in the past, Mazda wished to compete with the likes of ], ], ] and ] with a full factory effort. This would coincide with Mazda's continued running of the ] in Europe, as well as the ] at home.


After Mazda's success in winning the ], a change in engine rules by the ] would force Mazda to abandon their ] 4-rotor in the World Sportscar Championship. However IMSA rules continued to allow the use of rotaries, which led Mazda to bring the R26B to North America, with refinements to better suit the shorter races and circuits. After Mazda's success in winning the ], a change in engine rules by the ] forced Mazda to abandon their ] 4-rotor in the World Sportscar Championship. However, IMSA rules continued to allow the use of rotaries, which led Mazda to bring the R26B to North America, with refinements to better suit the shorter races and circuits.


For a chassis, Mazda would use the expertise of Crawford Composites to construct their tub, while Fabcar would assist in the project. Due to the different style of racing, the new car would not share much from Mazda's previous effort, the ] and it's predecessors. The tub would be built from ], while the bodywork designed by Lee Dykstra would feature new sweeping lines, including a large exposed vent flowing out from the front wheel well. For a chassis, Mazda would use the expertise of ] to construct the monocoque, while Fabcar would assist in the project. Due to the different style of racing, the new car would not share much from Mazda's previous effort, the ] and its predecessors. The tub would be built from ], while the bodywork designed by Lee Dykstra and Randy Wittine would feature new sweeping lines, including a large exposed vent flowing out from the front wheel well.


A total of three RX-792Ps would be built by Crawford for Mazda before the project was cancelled. A total of three RX-792Ps were built by ] for Mazda before the project was cancelled.


==Racing history== ==Racing history==
Managed by Mazda Motorsports, the first RX-792P would be completed shortly before the 1992 season would begin. The team would consist of drivers ] and ]. Opting to skip the ], the first chassis would appear at the Grand Prix of Miami. Unfortunately, a fire caused by the hot exhaust touching the car's bodywork would force the car to be withdrawn before the race even took place. This problem continued at the ], where the car caught fire once again just prior to the race. Managed by Mazda Motorsports, the first RX-792P was completed shortly before the 1992 season began. The team consisted of drivers ] and ]. Opting to skip the ], the first chassis appeared at the Grand Prix of Miami. Unfortunately, a fire caused by the hot exhaust touching the car's bodywork would force the car to be withdrawn before the race even took place. This problem continued at the ], where the car caught fire once again just prior to the race.


By the next round at ], the second RX-792P chassis would be completed. Both cars were entered in the event, but an accident in practiced forced the second car to not run. The lone remaining RX-792P would manage to take the green flag, finishing in a distant 15th place, nearly twenty laps behind the winner. With the second chassis repaired, Mazda moved to ], where the cars would finally show their potential. After qualifying in the middle of the grid, the pair would come home in third and fourth places, only three laps behind the winning ]. At ] the RX-792Ps would finish sixth and ninth. By the next round at ], the second RX-792P chassis was completed. Both cars were entered in the event, but an accident in practice forced the second car to not run. The lone remaining RX-792P managed to take the green flag, finishing in a distant 15th place, nearly twenty laps behind the winner. With the second chassis repaired, Mazda moved to ], where the cars would finally show their potential. After qualifying in the middle of the grid, the pair would come home in third and fourth places, three laps behind the winning ]. At ] the RX-792Ps finished sixth and ninth.


Problems crept up once again as the series moved to New Orleans, with one entry managing a mere 16th. However the Mazda team would quickly rebound to take their best finish of the season, with a second place at ], even though this was actually five laps behind the winner. A follow-up seventh place at ] would unfortunately be followed by a double DNF at ]. Problems crept up once again as the series moved to New Orleans, with one entry managing a mere 16th. However, the Mazda team would quickly rebound to take their best finish of the season, with a second place at ], even though this was actually five laps behind the winner. A follow-up seventh place at ] would unfortunately be followed by a double DNF at ].


A quick rebound would see fourth and fifth places at ] before the team once again failed to finish either car at ]. This trend would continue at the final race of the season, as neither car would make it to the checkered flag. This string of bad results would leave Mazda a distant sixth in the constructor's championship, although Price Cobb would be able to finish eighth in the driver's championship. A quick rebound would see fourth and fifth places at ] before the team once again failed to finish with either car at ]. This trend would continue at the final race of the season, as neither car would make it to the checkered flag. This string of bad results would leave Mazda a distant sixth in the constructor's championship, although Price Cobb would be able to finish eighth in the driver's championship.


==Cancellation== ==Cancellation==
Following the 1992 season, sports car racing throughout the world was greatly altered. Both the ] and ] would be cancelled, leaving Mazda's expensive ] nowhere to race. At the same time, IMSA announced plans to abandon the GTP category after the 1993 season, turning instead to a new category of open-cockpit prototypes. This meant that Mazda would only have one more year to be able to use the RX-792P in North America only before they would have to construct an all new car. Following the 1992 season, sports car racing throughout the world was greatly altered. Both the ] and ] would be cancelled, leaving Mazda's expensive ] with nowhere to race. At the same time, IMSA announced plans to abandon the GTP category after the 1993 season, turning instead to a new category of open-cockpit prototypes. This meant that Mazda would only have one more year to be able to use the RX-792P in North America only before they would have to construct an all-new car.


But the RX-792P effort was full steam ahead for 1993 and the group began to look towards improvements that could be made the the chassis. On IMSA’s sliding weight vs. engine displacement scale the Mazda 4-rotor came in at 1750 lbs and many teams had cause for concern about this thinking the Mazda engine had been gifted a power-to-weight ratio advantage. While the RX-792P showed occasional turns of speed, the reality was that the engine simply was giving up far too much horsepower to its competitors thus making the perceived power to weight bias within the regulations just that; a perception and not a reality. And, any advantage that might have been was certainly offset for the need to cool the car and the corresponding drag relative to power output. The RX-792P effort was full steam ahead for 1993 and the group began to look towards improvements that could be made the chassis. On IMSA’s sliding weight vs. engine displacement scale, the Mazda 4-rotor came in at {{convert|1750|lb|abbr=on}} and many teams had cause for concern about this, thinking that the Mazda engine had been gifted a ] advantage. While the RX-792P showed occasional turns of speed, the reality was that the engine simply was giving up far too much horsepower to its competitors, thus making the perceived power-to-weight bias within the regulations just that, a perception and not a reality. Also, any advantage that might have been was certainly offset for the need to cool the car and the corresponding drag relative to power output.


With that in mind Mazda was thinking about what could be done to close that power gap. Mazdaspeed supplied the program’s 4-rotor engines and had developments on the dyno in Japan that were producing 700+ hp. “Needless to say we were excited and looking forward to the 1993 season,” says Dick St. Yves, Mazda Motorsports Manager 1988-1993. Subsequently design mockups were underway to move the oil cooler into the side pods and enlarging the front mounted radiator. A program of weight reduction was also being considered as the car never scrutineered at its 1750 lb. minimum anyway, typically coming in around 75 lbs. above it. With that in mind, Mazda was thinking about what could be done to close that power gap. Mazdaspeed supplied the program’s 4-rotor engines and had developments undergoing testing on the dynomometer in Japan that were producing in excess of 700hp. “Needless to say we were excited and looking forward to the 1993 season,” said Dick St. Yves, Mazda Motorsports Manager 1988-1993. Subsequently, design mockups were underway to move the oil cooler into the side pods and enlarging the front-mounted radiator. A program of weight reduction was also being considered as the car never scrutineered at its {{convert|1750|lb|abbr=on}}. minimum anyway, typically coming in around {{convert|75|lb|abbr=on}}. above it.


The RX-792P program was done to an astonishingly small budget according to Dick St. Yves, “I have been told that Toyota’s budget was $20,000,000 and Nissan was in the area of $35,000,000, our budget was $5,000,000.” The program started in May of 1991 to a vacant warehouse in Charlotte, North Carolina and by February of 1992 the first car was assembled into these humble beginnings. The 4-rotor was giving up tremendous power as well, in the region of 200+, to its competitors. And while the regulations seemed give the Mazda a weight advantage, it certainly wasn’t able to bring that to bear. Considering year one a development year, as with all of the one-year wonders, year two certainly would have had much more to offer. Alas St. Yves relates that his 1993 budget had actually been approved by Mazda USA in October of 1992 but for Mazda Corporation to announce a month later they were pulling out of racing, “The 4-rotor engine was the only component of the car that came from Japan. We were informed a few days later that they were discontinuing the experimental engine program, which was the 4-rotor, and that was the demise of the RX-792P program.” So with a budget, but no engines, that’s how it ended. By December of 1992 the doors were closed. The RX-792P program was done to an astonishingly small budget according to Dick St. Yves: “I have been told that Toyota’s budget was $20,000,000 and Nissan was in the area of $35,000,000, our budget was $5,000,000”. The program started in May 1991 in a vacant warehouse in Charlotte, North Carolina and by February 1992 the first car was assembled into these humble beginnings. The 4-rotor was giving up tremendous power as well, in the region of 200+, to its competitors. And while the regulations seemed give the Mazda a weight advantage, it certainly wasn’t able to bring that to bear. Considering year one a development year, as with all of the one-year wonders, year two certainly would have had much more to offer. Alas St. Yves relates that his 1993 budget had actually been approved by Mazda USA in October 1992 but for Mazda Corporation to announce a month later they were pulling out of racing: “The 4-rotor engine was the only component of the car that came from Japan. We were informed a few days later that they were discontinuing the experimental engine program, which was the 4-rotor, and that was the demise of the RX-792P program”. So team had a budget, but no engines. By December 1992 the doors were closed.


==References== ==References==
Fuller, Michael J. and J.A. Martin, Inside IMSA’s Legendary GTP Cars: The Prototype Experience. Minneapolis: Motor Books International, 2008. Pages 232-245. Fuller, Michael J. and J.A. Martin, Inside IMSA’s Legendary GTP Cars: The Prototype Experience. Minneapolis: Motor Books International, 2008. Pages 232-245.
{{reflist}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{commonscat}}
* - Mazda RX-792P * - Mazda RX-792P
* - Crawford history * - Crawford history


{{Mazda sportscar racers}} {{Mazda sportscar racers}}
{{IMSA GTP Cars}}


] ]
] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 13:01, 1 December 2023

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Mazda RX-792P" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Motor vehicle
Mazda RX-792P
Overview
ManufacturerMazda (Crawford)
Production1992
DesignerLee Dykstra
Randy Wittine
Body and chassis
ClassIMSA sports prototype
Body style2-door Coupé
LayoutRMR layout
RelatedMazda 787B
Powertrain
Engine2.6 L (159 cu in) R26B Rotary-4
Power output690 hp (700 PS; 515 kW) at 9,000 rpm
608 N⋅m (448 lb⋅ft) at 4,500 rpm
TransmissionMarch 5-speed manual
Dimensions
Wheelbase2,667 mm (105.0 in)
Length4,800 mm (189.0 in)
Width1,981 mm (78.0 in)
Height1,016 mm (40.0 in)
Curb weight830 kg (1,829.8 lb)

The Mazda RX-792P is a sports prototype racing car built for the IMSA GT Championship's GTP category for Mazda. Its career was short lived, with only two cars running in 1992 before the project was abandoned.

The car's name is a combination of Mazda's RX-7 road car, the year the car raced (1992) and the fact that it was a Prototype.

Development

Following many successful years running the RX-7 in IMSA's GTO class and MX-6 in the GTU class, Mazda chose to take on a new challenge. Although Mazda had supported the use of their rotary engines in GTP prototypes in the past, Mazda wished to compete with the likes of Porsche, Nissan, Jaguar and Toyota with a full factory effort. This would coincide with Mazda's continued running of the World Sportscar Championship in Europe, as well as the All Japan Sports Prototype Championship at home.

After Mazda's success in winning the 1991 24 Hours of Le Mans, a change in engine rules by the FIA forced Mazda to abandon their R26B 4-rotor in the World Sportscar Championship. However, IMSA rules continued to allow the use of rotaries, which led Mazda to bring the R26B to North America, with refinements to better suit the shorter races and circuits.

For a chassis, Mazda would use the expertise of Crawford Composites to construct the monocoque, while Fabcar would assist in the project. Due to the different style of racing, the new car would not share much from Mazda's previous effort, the 787B and its predecessors. The tub would be built from carbon fiber, while the bodywork designed by Lee Dykstra and Randy Wittine would feature new sweeping lines, including a large exposed vent flowing out from the front wheel well.

A total of three RX-792Ps were built by Crawford for Mazda before the project was cancelled.

Racing history

Managed by Mazda Motorsports, the first RX-792P was completed shortly before the 1992 season began. The team consisted of drivers Price Cobb and Pete Halsmer. Opting to skip the 24 Hours of Daytona, the first chassis appeared at the Grand Prix of Miami. Unfortunately, a fire caused by the hot exhaust touching the car's bodywork would force the car to be withdrawn before the race even took place. This problem continued at the 12 Hours of Sebring, where the car caught fire once again just prior to the race.

By the next round at Road Atlanta, the second RX-792P chassis was completed. Both cars were entered in the event, but an accident in practice forced the second car to not run. The lone remaining RX-792P managed to take the green flag, finishing in a distant 15th place, nearly twenty laps behind the winner. With the second chassis repaired, Mazda moved to Lime Rock Park, where the cars would finally show their potential. After qualifying in the middle of the grid, the pair would come home in third and fourth places, three laps behind the winning Toyota. At Mid-Ohio the RX-792Ps finished sixth and ninth.

Problems crept up once again as the series moved to New Orleans, with one entry managing a mere 16th. However, the Mazda team would quickly rebound to take their best finish of the season, with a second place at Watkins Glen, even though this was actually five laps behind the winner. A follow-up seventh place at Laguna Seca would unfortunately be followed by a double DNF at Portland.

A quick rebound would see fourth and fifth places at Road America before the team once again failed to finish with either car at Phoenix. This trend would continue at the final race of the season, as neither car would make it to the checkered flag. This string of bad results would leave Mazda a distant sixth in the constructor's championship, although Price Cobb would be able to finish eighth in the driver's championship.

Cancellation

Following the 1992 season, sports car racing throughout the world was greatly altered. Both the World Sportscar Championship and All Japan Sports Prototype Championship would be cancelled, leaving Mazda's expensive MXR-01 with nowhere to race. At the same time, IMSA announced plans to abandon the GTP category after the 1993 season, turning instead to a new category of open-cockpit prototypes. This meant that Mazda would only have one more year to be able to use the RX-792P in North America only before they would have to construct an all-new car.

The RX-792P effort was full steam ahead for 1993 and the group began to look towards improvements that could be made the chassis. On IMSA’s sliding weight vs. engine displacement scale, the Mazda 4-rotor came in at 1,750 lb (790 kg) and many teams had cause for concern about this, thinking that the Mazda engine had been gifted a power-to-weight ratio advantage. While the RX-792P showed occasional turns of speed, the reality was that the engine simply was giving up far too much horsepower to its competitors, thus making the perceived power-to-weight bias within the regulations just that, a perception and not a reality. Also, any advantage that might have been was certainly offset for the need to cool the car and the corresponding drag relative to power output.

With that in mind, Mazda was thinking about what could be done to close that power gap. Mazdaspeed supplied the program’s 4-rotor engines and had developments undergoing testing on the dynomometer in Japan that were producing in excess of 700hp. “Needless to say we were excited and looking forward to the 1993 season,” said Dick St. Yves, Mazda Motorsports Manager 1988-1993. Subsequently, design mockups were underway to move the oil cooler into the side pods and enlarging the front-mounted radiator. A program of weight reduction was also being considered as the car never scrutineered at its 1,750 lb (790 kg). minimum anyway, typically coming in around 75 lb (34 kg). above it.

The RX-792P program was done to an astonishingly small budget according to Dick St. Yves: “I have been told that Toyota’s budget was $20,000,000 and Nissan was in the area of $35,000,000, our budget was $5,000,000”. The program started in May 1991 in a vacant warehouse in Charlotte, North Carolina and by February 1992 the first car was assembled into these humble beginnings. The 4-rotor was giving up tremendous power as well, in the region of 200+, to its competitors. And while the regulations seemed give the Mazda a weight advantage, it certainly wasn’t able to bring that to bear. Considering year one a development year, as with all of the one-year wonders, year two certainly would have had much more to offer. Alas St. Yves relates that his 1993 budget had actually been approved by Mazda USA in October 1992 but for Mazda Corporation to announce a month later they were pulling out of racing: “The 4-rotor engine was the only component of the car that came from Japan. We were informed a few days later that they were discontinuing the experimental engine program, which was the 4-rotor, and that was the demise of the RX-792P program”. So team had a budget, but no engines. By December 1992 the doors were closed.

References

Fuller, Michael J. and J.A. Martin, Inside IMSA’s Legendary GTP Cars: The Prototype Experience. Minneapolis: Motor Books International, 2008. Pages 232-245.

  1. Nick D (April 2016). "RX-792P, specifications". supercars.net. Retrieved 2017-12-20.
  2. ^ Wouter Melissen (2015-01-25). "Mazda RX-792P Specifications". ultimatecarpage.com. Retrieved 2017-12-20.

External links

Mazda sportscar racers (1983–2021)
Group C/IMSA GTP (1983–1992):
DP/DPi (2014–2021):
IMSA Grand Touring Prototypes (1981–1993)
Categories: